Entity

Time filter

Source Type

Almere Stad, Netherlands

Yasuda E.,Yakult Central Institute for Microbiological Research | Sako T.,Yakult Europe | Tateno H.,Japan National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology | Hirabayashi J.,Japan National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
Methods in Molecular Biology | Year: 2014

Since 2005, lectin microarray technology has emerged as a simple and powerful technique for comprehensive glycan analysis. By using evanescent-field fluorescence detection technique, it has been applied for analysis of not only glycoproteins and glycolipids secreted by eukaryotic cells but also glycoconjugates on the cell surface of live eukaryotic cells. Bacterial cells are known to be decorated with polysaccharides, teichoic acids, and proteins in the peptide glycans of their cell wall and lipoteichoic acids in their phospholipid bilayer. Specific glycan structures are characteristic of many highly pathogenic bacteria, while polysaccharides moiety of lactic acid bacteria are known to play a role as probiotics to modulate the host immune response. However, the method of analysis and knowledge of glycosylation structure of bacteria are limited. Here, we describe the development of a simple and sensitive method based on lectin microarray technology for direct analysis of intact bacterial cell surface glycomes. The method involves labeling bacterial cells with SYTOX Orange before incubation with the lectin microarray. After washing, bound cells are directly detected using an evanescent-field fluorescence scanner in a liquid phase. The entire procedure takes 3 h from putting labeled bacteria on the microarray to profiling its lectin binding affinity. Using this method, we compared the cell surface glycomes from 16 different strains of L. casei/paracasei. The lectin binding profile of most strains was found to be unique. Our technique provides a novel strategy for rapid profiling of bacteria and enables us to differentiate numerous bacterial strains with relevance to the biological functions of surface glycosylation. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York. Source


Calder P.C.,University of Southampton | Ahluwalia N.,University of Paris 13 | Albers R.,Unilever | Bosco N.,Nestle | And 13 more authors.
British Journal of Nutrition | Year: 2013

To monitor inflammation in a meaningful way, the markers used must be valid: they must reflect the inflammatory process under study and they must be predictive of future health status. In 2009, the Nutrition and Immunity Task Force of the International Life Sciences Institute, European Branch, organized an expert group to attempt to identify robust and predictive markers, or patterns or clusters of markers, which can be used to assess inflammation in human nutrition studies in the general population. Inflammation is a normal process and there are a number of cells and mediators involved. These markers are involved in, or are produced as a result of, the inflammatory process irrespective of its trigger and its location and are common to all inflammatory situations. Currently, there is no consensus as to which markers of inflammation best represent low-grade inflammation or differentiate between acute and chronic inflammation or between the various phases of inflammatory responses. There are a number of modifying factors that affect the concentration of an inflammatory marker at a given time, including age, diet and body fatness, among others. Measuring the concentration of inflammatory markers in the bloodstream under basal conditions is probably less informative compared with data related to the concentration change in response to a challenge. A number of inflammatory challenges have been described. However, many of these challenges are poorly standardised. Patterns and clusters may be important as robust biomarkers of inflammation. Therefore, it is likely that a combination of multiple inflammatory markers and integrated readouts based upon kinetic analysis following defined challenges will be the most informative biomarker of inflammation. Copyright © ILSI Europe 2013. Source


Albers R.,Unilever | Bourdet-Sicard R.,Danone Research | Braun D.,Institute Merieux | Calder P.C.,University of Southampton | And 11 more authors.
British Journal of Nutrition | Year: 2013

Optimal functioning of the immune system is crucial to human health, and nutrition is one of the major exogenous factors modulating different aspects of immune function. Currently, no single marker is available to predict the effect of a dietary intervention on different aspects of immune function. To provide further guidance on the assessment and interpretation of the modulation of immune functions due to nutrition in the general population, International Life Sciences Institute Europe commissioned a group of experts from academia, government and the food industry to prepare a guidance document. A draft of this paper was refined at a workshop involving additional experts. First, the expert group defined criteria to evaluate the usefulness of immune function markers. Over seventy-five markers were scored within the context of three distinct immune system functions: defence against pathogens; avoidance or mitigation of allergy; control of low-grade (metabolic) inflammation. The most useful markers were subsequently classified depending on whether they by themselves signify clinical relevance and/or involvement of immune function. Next, five theoretical scenarios were drafted describing potential changes in the values of markers compared with a relevant reference range. Finally, all elements were combined, providing a framework to aid the design and interpretation of studies assessing the effects of nutrition on immune function. This stepwise approach offers a clear rationale for selecting markers for future trials and provides a framework for the interpretation of outcomes. A similar stepwise approach may also be useful to rationalise the selection and interpretation of markers for other physiological processes critical to the maintenance of health and well-being. © [2013] ILSI Europe. Source


Rijkers G.T.,University Utrecht | Bengmark S.,University College London | Enck P.,University of Tubingen | Haller D.,TU Munich | And 14 more authors.
Journal of Nutrition | Year: 2010

Probiotic bacteria are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. There is a growing interest in probiotics within the scientific community, with consumers, and in the food industry. The interactions between the gut and intestinal microbiota and between resident and transient microbiota define a new arena in physiology, an understanding of which would shed light on the "cross-talk" between humans and microbes. The different beneficial effects of specific probiotic strains may be translated into different health claims. However, there is a need for comprehensive and harmonized guidelines on the assessment of the characteristics and efficacy of probiotics and of foods containing them. An international expert group of ILSI has evaluated the published evidence of the functionality of different probiotics in 4 areas of (human) application: 1) metabolism, 2) chronic intestinal inflammatory and functional disorders, 3) infections, and 4) allergy. Based on the existing evidence, concrete examples of demonstration of benefits and gaps are listed, and guidelines and recommendations are defined that should help design the next generation of probiotic studies. © 2010 American Society for Nutrition. Source

Discover hidden collaborations