Entity

Time filter

Source Type

Nottingham, United Kingdom

Daniels S.E.,Premier Research | Goulder M.A.,Worldwide Clinical Trials | Aspley S.,Reckitt Benckiser | Reader S.,Clearcut Clinical Consulting
Pain | Year: 2011

Combination analgesia is often recommended for the relief of severe pain. This was a double-blind, 5-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised, single-dose study designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a novel single-tablet combination of ibuprofen and paracetamol with that of an ibuprofen/codeine combination, and a paracetamol/codeine combination, using the dental impaction pain model. Subjects with at least 3 impacted third molars and experiencing moderate to severe postoperative pain were randomised to receive: 1 or 2 tablets of a single-tablet combination of ibuprofen 200 mg/paracetamol 500 mg; 2 tablets of ibuprofen 200 mg/codeine 12.8 mg; 2 tablets of paracetamol 500 mg/codeine 15 mg; or placebo. Results for the primary endpoint, the sum of the mean scores of pain relief combined with pain intensity differences over 12 hours, demonstrated that 1 and 2 tablets of the single-tablet combination of ibuprofen/paracetamol were statistically significantly more efficacious than 2 tablets of placebo (P < 0.0001) and paracetamol/codeine (P ≤ 0.0001); furthermore, 2 tablets offered significantly superior pain relief to ibuprofen/codeine (P = 0.0001), and 1 tablet was found noninferior to this combination. Adverse events were uncommon during this study and treatment emergent adverse events were statistically significantly less frequent in the groups taking the ibuprofen/paracetamol combination compared with codeine combinations. In conclusion, 1 or 2 tablets of a single-tablet combination of ibuprofen 200 mg/paracetamol 500 mg provided highly effective analgesia that was comparable with, or superior to, other combination analgesics currently indicated for strong pain. A single-tablet combination of ibuprofen 200 mg/paracetamol 500 mg provides highly effective analgesia, comparable or superior to other combination analgesics indicated for strong pain. © 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Source


Markus H.S.,St Georges, University of London | McCollum C.,University of Manchester | Imray C.,Coventry University | Goulder M.A.,Worldwide Clinical Trials | And 2 more authors.
Stroke | Year: 2011

Background and Purpose-Inhibition of von Willebrand factor offers a novel approach to prevention of stroke and myocardial ischemia but has not yet been demonstrated to show efficacy on clinically relevant end points. ARC1779 is an aptamer that inhibits the prothrombotic function of von Willebrand factor by binding to the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor and thereby blocking its interaction with glycoprotein. Phase 1 studies suggest it inhibits platelet aggregation with less increase in bleeding than conventional antiplatelet agents. The effect of ARC 1779 on cerebral emboli immediately after carotid endarterectomy was investigated in a randomized clinical trial. Methods-Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were randomized double-blind to ARC1779 or placebo administered intravenously. Transcranial Doppler recording, to detect cerebral embolic signals, was performed in the first 3 hours postoperatively. The primary end point was time to first embolic signals. Results-Thirty-six patients were recruited, 18 in each arm. The Kaplan-Meier median time to first embolic signals was 83.6 minutes for ARC1779 compared with 5.5 minutes for placebo. Using Cox proportional hazards embolic signals occurred statistically significantly later on ARC1779 (P=0.007). Reduced embolic signals counts were correlated with inhibition of von Willebrand factor activity (P=0.03). Increased perioperative bleeding and anemia were seen with ARC1779. Conclusions-von Willebrand factor inhibition reduces thromboembolism in humans. It may play a role in treatment of stroke and myocardial ischemia. The extent to which bleeding complications occur in nonoperated patients needs to be assessed in further studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00742612. © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc. Source


Wade A.G.,CPS Research | Morris C.,Reckitt Benckiser | Shephard A.,Reckitt Benckiser | Crawford G.M.,CPS Research | Goulder M.A.,Worldwide Clinical Trials
BMC Family Practice | Year: 2011

Background: Clinically proven over-the-counter (OTC) treatment options are becoming increasingly important in the self-management of acute sore throat. The aim of this study was to determine the analgesic and sensorial benefits of two different amylmetacresol/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol (AMC/DCBA) throat lozenge formulation variants, AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge, compared with an unflavoured, non-medicated placebo lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infections. Methods. In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study, 225 adult patients with acute sore throat were randomly assigned to receive either one AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge (n = 77), one AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge (n = 74) or one unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge (matched for size, shape and demulcency; n = 74). After baseline assessments, patients received their assigned lozenge and completed four rating assessments at 11 timepoints from 1 to 120 minutes post dose. Analgesic properties were assessed by comparing severity of throat soreness and sore throat relief ratings. Difficulty in swallowing, throat numbness, functional, sensorial and emotional benefits were also assessed. Results: Both the AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge induced significant analgesic, functional, sensorial and emotional effects compared with the unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge. Sore throat relief, improvements in throat soreness and difficulty in swallowing, and throat numbness were observed as early as 1-5 minutes, and lasted up to 2 hours post dose. Sensorial benefits of warming and cooling associated with the AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge, respectively, were experienced soon after first dose, and in the case of the latter, it lasted long after the lozenge had dissolved. Emotional benefits of feeling better, happier, less distracted and less frustrated were reported in those taking either of the AMC/DCBA throat lozenge variants, with no differences in adverse events compared with the unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge. Conclusions: AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenges are well-tolerated and effective OTC treatment options, offering functional, sensorial and emotional benefits to patients with acute sore throat, over and above that of the rapid efficacy effects provided. Trial registration. ISRCTN: ISRCTN00003567. © 2011 Wade et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Source


Riordan H.J.,Medical and Scientific Affairs | Antonini P.,Medical and Scientific Affairs | Murphy M.F.,Worldwide Clinical Trials
American Health and Drug Benefits | Year: 2011

Background: Metabolic syndrome is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with schizophrenia, with a prevalence rate double that of nonpsychiatric populations. Given the amount of evidence suggesting a link between atypical antipsychotic medications and metabolic syndrome, several agencies have recommended regular clinical monitoring of weight, symptoms of hyperglycemia, and glucose in chronically medicated patients with schizophrenia. Objectives: To summarize the current literature on atypical antipsychotic-induced metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia, outline some of the molecular mechanisms behind this syndrome, identify demographic and disease-related risk factors, and describe cost-effective methods for surveillance. Discussion: The differential prevalence of metabolic syndrome associated with various atypical antipsychotic medications has been evidenced across numerous studies, with higher effects seen for certain antipsychotic medications on weight gain, waist circumference, fasting triglyceride level, and glucose levels. Given the association of these symptoms, all atypical antipsychotic medications currently include a warning about the risk of hyperglycemia and diabetes, as well as suggestions for regular monitoring. Despite this, very little data are available to support adherence to these monitoring recommendations. Lack of awareness and resources, diffusion of responsibility, policy implementation, and organizational structure have all been implicated. Conclusion: The treatment of schizophrenia involves a balance in terms of risks and benefits. Failing to treat because of risk for complications from metabolic syndrome may place the patient at a higher risk for more serious health outcomes. Supporting programs aimed at increasing monitoring of simple laboratory and clinical measures associated with metabolic syndrome may decrease important risk factors, improve patients' quality of life, and reduce healthcare costs. Source


Unger S.E.,Worldwide Clinical Trials
Bioanalysis | Year: 2011

This year, the Applied Pharmaceutical Analysis meeting changed its venue to the Grand Tremont Hotel in Baltimore, MD, USA. Proximity to Washington presented the opportunity to have four speakers from the US FDA. The purpose of the 4-day conference is to provide a forum in which pharmaceutical and CRO scientists can discuss and develop best practices for scientific challenges in bioanalysis and drug metabolism. This years theme was Bioanalytical and Biotransformation Challenges in Meeting Global Regulatory Expectations & New Technologies for Drug Discovery Challenges. Applied Pharmaceutical Analysis continued its tradition of highlighting new technologies and its impact on drug discovery, drug metabolism and small molecule-regulated bioanalysis. This year, the meeting included an integrated focus on metabolism in drug discovery and development. Middle and large molecule (biotherapeutics) drug development, immunoassay, immunogenicity and biomarkers were also integrated into the forum. Applied Pharmaceutical Analysis offered an enhanced diversity of topics this year while continuing to share experiences of discovering and developing new medicines. © 2011 Future Science Ltd. Source

Discover hidden collaborations