Hall B.,University of Sydney |
Hall B.,Midwifery and Womens Health Nursing Research Unit |
Iwasenko J.,Virology Research |
Iwasenko J.,University of New South Wales |
And 7 more authors.
BMC Research Notes | Year: 2013
Background: The level of lactate in amniotic fluid may provide useful clinical information when assessing progress of a woman's labour and if so, a rapid, reliable method to assess amniotic fluid lactate is required in order to be clinically relevant. However, measuring lactate levels in amniotic fluid, using portable, handheld lactate meters may be less accurate than reference laboratory instruments designed to measure lactate levels in aqueous solutions. Prior to conducting a large study, we assessed recruitment, consent and sampling procedures, and the accuracy of a handheld lactate meter to measure lactate in amniotic fluid. We compared amniotic fluid lactate results obtained using the hand held Lactate Pro (Arkray) to results obtained using reference laboratory methods ABX Pentra 400 (Horiba). Results: We recruited 35 nulliparous women during their antenatal hospital visits and tested amniotic fluid samples collected from 20 labouring women. The handheld Lactate Pro meter was found accurate from 9-20 mmol/L with a Passing & Bablok regression of y = 0.18 + 0.97x (95% CI 0.76-1.45). Amniotic fluid lactate results remained reliable in the presence of potential contaminants commonly encountered during labour; obstetric lubricant, blood and meconium. Conclusion: The measurement of amniotic fluid lactate using the Lactate Pro meter was reliable compared to reference laboratory methods for measuring lactate levels in amniotic fluid. The pilot study enabled the refinement of information, recruitment, consenting and sampling procedures prior to commencing a large cohort study. © 2013 Hall et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Source
Hall B.,University of Sydney |
Hall B.,Midwifery and Womens Health Research Unit |
Hall B.,Virology Research |
Hall B.,South Eastern Area Laboratory Services |
And 7 more authors.
BMC Research Notes | Year: 2014
Background: The level of lactate in amniotic fluid may provide useful clinical information when assessing whether a woman in labour is experiencing labour dystocia. If so, a rapid, reliable method to assess the concentration of amniotic fluid lactate at the bedside will be required in order to be clinically relevant. To assess efficacy, we compared the hand held StatStripXPreass lactate meter (Nova Biomedical) to the reference laboratory analyser ABX Pentra 400 (Horiba) in a controlled environment. Baseline biological lactate concentration was measured in triplicate and samples of a known quantity of thawed amniotic fluid spiked with lactate substrate (62 mmol/L) from the LDH12 kit (Roche, SUI) to yield a predetermined lactate concentration above baseline then measured in triplicate. Deming Regression was used to determine the linear agreement and a Bland Altman plot used to determine the paired agreement across the range of values. Findings: The mean difference with Bland-Altman plot between hand held meter and lab instrument was-1.0 mmol/L (SD 3.0 mmol/L) with 95% CI limits of agreement between-6.9 mmol/L to 4.9 mmol/L.The Deming regression co-efficient or slope of agreement was 0.91 (SD of 0.21). Conclusion: The measurement of amniotic fluid lactate using the StatStripXPress hand held meter was reliable compared to reference laboratory methods for measuring lactate levels in amniotic fluid. © 2014 Hall et al. Source
Nair S.,University of New South Wales |
Leung K.-C.,Virology Research |
Leung K.-C.,University of Sydney |
Rawlinson W.D.,University of New South Wales |
And 4 more authors.
Journal of Medical Virology | Year: 2010
Despite evidence supporting an association between enterovirus (EV) infection and type 1 diabetes, the etiological mechanism(s) for EV-induced beta cell destruction is(are) not well understood. In this study, the effects of Coxsackievirus B (CVB) 1-6 on cell lysis and cytokine/chemokine expression in the insulinoma-1 (INS-1) beta cell line were investigated. Cytolysis was assessed using tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50). Quantitative RT-PCR was used to measure viral RNA and mRNA of cytokines interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 (CXCL10), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5) in infected INS-1 cells. CVB2, 4, 5, and 6 lysed and replicated in INS-1 cells; TCID50 was lowest for CVB5 and highest for CVB6. IFN-γ, CXCL10, and CCL5 mRNA levels all increased significantly following infection with CVB2, 4, 5, and 6 (P<0.05). CCL2 mRNA increased with CVB2, 5, and 6 (P<0.05), IFN-α mRNA increased with CVB5 infection (P<0.05), while TNF-α mRNA and IFN-β mRNA (P<0.001) increased with CVB2 infection. Dose-dependent effects of infection on cytokine mRNA levels were observed for all (P<0.01) except IFN-γ. Following inoculation of INS-1 cells with CVB1 and 3, viral RNA was not detected and cytokine/chemokine mRNA levels were unchanged. In conclusion, CVB2, 4, 5, and 6 induce dose-dependent cytokine and chemokine mRNA production from INS-1 cells suggesting that pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine secretion by beta cells is a potential mechanism for EV-induced beta cell damage in type 1 diabetes. J. Med. Virol. 82:1950-1957, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Source