Belar O.,Endocrinology Research Group |
Belar O.,University of the Basque Country |
De La Hoz C.,University of the Basque Country |
Perez-Nanclares G.,Endocrinology Research Group |
And 42 more authors.
Clinical Endocrinology | Year: 2012
Context: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder mostly owing to a genetic defect in MEN1 gene. Not all patients with MEN1 phenotype present a defect in this gene. Thus, other genes like CDKN and AIP have been showed to be involved in MEN1-like patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a genetic screening in our cohort or patients with suspected MEN1 syndrome by direct sequencing analysis of MEN1, CDKN1B and AIP, and dosage analysis of MEN1 and AIP. Results: A total of 79 different sporadic and familial cases with the MEN1 phenotype have been studied, in which 34 of them (48%) present a mutation in MEN1 gene. In two patients without a detectable mutation in MEN1 gene, we have identified a novel missense mutation (c.163G>A/p.Ala55Thr) in CDKN1B gene and a novel frameshift mutation (c.825-845delCGCGGCCGTGTGGAATGCC CA/p. His275GlnfsX49) in AIP gene, respectively. Conclusions: Our data support that MEN1 gene is the main target for genetic analysis in clinical MEN1 syndrome. We confirm that in those patients without MEN1 gene mutation, other genes such as CDKN1B/p27Kip, or AIP in those including pituitary tumours should also be tested. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Source
Safety and efficacy of colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia as part of a macro-project funded by the Seventh Framework Program of the European Commission studying off-patent antibiotics: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Rosso-Fernandez C.,University of Seville |
Garnacho-Montero J.,Institute of Biomedicine of Seville IBIS Hospital Virgen del Rocio |
Antonelli M.,Catholic University of the Sacred Heart |
Dimopoulos G.,National and Kapodistrian University of Athens |
And 34 more authors.
Trials | Year: 2015
Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common and severe hospital-adquired infections, and multidrugresistant gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) constitute the main etiology in many countries. Inappropriate empiric antimicrobial treatment is associated with increased mortality. In this context, the empirical treatment of choice for VAP is unknown. Colistin, is now the antimicrobial with greatest in vitro activity against MDR-GNB. Methods/Design: The MagicBullet clinical trial is an investigator-driven clinical study, funded by the Seventh Framework Program of the European Commission. This is designed as a phase IV, randomized, controlled, open label, non-inferiority and international trial to assess the safety and efficacy of colistin versus meropenem in late onset VAP. The study is conducted in a total of 32 centers in three European countries (Spain, Italy and Greece) with specific high incidences of infections caused by MDR-GNB. Patients older than 18 years who develop VAP with both clinical and radiological signs, and are on mechanical ventilation for more than 96 hours, or less than 96 hours but with previous antibiotic treatment plus one week of hospitalization, are candidates for inclusion in the study. Discussion: Currently, there is no study being undertaken which analyzes empiric treatment of (VAP) with a suspicion of multi-resistance. Colistin, an off-patent antibiotic commercialized for more than 60 years, could widen the antibiotic alternatives for a high-mortality illness aggravated by antibiotic resistance. © Rosso-Fernández et al.; licensee BioMed Central. Source
Ferra C.,Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona |
Sanz J.,Hospital La Fe Valencia |
de la Camara R.,Hospital de la Princesa Madrid |
Sanz G.,Hospital La Fe Valencia |
And 18 more authors.
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | Year: 2010
Adults with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR-ALL) have a poor outcome with standard chemotherapy and usually undergo unrelated stem cell transplantation (SCT) if a matched sibling donor is not available. We analyzed the outcome of adult patients with unrelated SCT for HR-ALL and studied the possible effect of the hematopoietic stem cell source of the transplant. A total of 149 adult patients (median age, 29 years, range, 15-59 years) with HR-ALL underwent unrelated SCT in 13 Spanish institutions between 2000 and 2007. Patients in first complete remission (CR1) at transplantation had at least one adverse prognostic factor (advanced age, adverse cytogenetics, hyperleukocytosis, or slow response to induction therapy). ALL was in CR1 in 81 patients (54%), in second CR (CR2) in 37 patients (25%), in third CR (CR3) in 11 patients (7%), and with overt disease in 20 patients (13%). The hematopoietic source was unrelated cord blood (UCB) in 62 patients and an unrelated donor (UD) in 87 patients. The patients undergoing UCB-SCT and UD-SCT were comparable in terms of the main clinical and biological features of ALL, except for a higher frequency of patients with more overt disease in the UCB-SCT group. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years between the 2 groups. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was significantly lower in the UCB-SCT group (P = .021). The probability of relapse at 1 year was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-27%) for the UD-SCT group and 27% (95% CI, 14%-40%) for the UCB-SCT group (P = .088), respectively. Only disease status at transplantation (CR1, 41% [95% CI, 18%-64%] vs CR2, 51% [95% CI, 17%-85%] vs advanced disease, 66% [95% CI, 46%-86%]; P = .001) and the absence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (74% [95% CI, 46%-100%] vs 33% [95% CI, 17%-49%]; P = .034) were significant factors for relapse. All unrelated transplantation modalities were associated with high treatment-related mortality for adult HR-ALL patients without a sibling donor. UCB-SCT and UD-SCT were found to be equivalent options. Disease status at transplantation and chronic GVHD were the main factors influencing relapse in both transplantation modalities. © 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Source