Time filter

Source Type

Heguy J.M.,University of California Cooperative Extension | Meyer D.,University of California at Davis | Silva-del-Rio N.,Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center | Silva-del-Rio N.,University of California at Davis
Journal of Dairy Science | Year: 2016

The aim of the present study was to gather baseline information on corn silage-management practices to develop an outreach curriculum for dairy producers and growers. In spring 2013, dairy producers in the San Joaquin Valley (California) were surveyed on their silage-management practices. Response rate was 14.5% (n = 160) and herd size averaged 1,512 milking cows. Harvest date was set solely by the dairy producer (53.4%) or with the assistance of the crop manager, custom chopper, or nutritionist (23.3%). On some dairies (23.3%), the dairy producer delegated the harvest date decision. Most dairies (75.0%) estimated crop dry matter before harvest, and the preferred method was milk line evaluation. Dairy producers were mostly unfamiliar with harvest rate but the number [1 (35.9%), 2 (50.3%), or 3 to 5 (13.8%)] and size [6-row (17.7%), 8-row (67.3%), or 10-row (15.0%)] of choppers working simultaneously was reported. Most dairies used a single packing tractor (68.8%) and weighed every load of fresh chopped corn delivered to the silage pit (62%). During harvest, dry matter (66.9%), particle length (80.4%), and kernel processing (92.5%) were monitored. Most dairies completed filling their largest silage structure in less than 3 d (48.5%) or in 4 to 7 d (30.9%). Silage covering was completed no later than 72. h after structure completion in all dairies, and was often completed within 24. h (68.8%). Packed forage was covered as filled in 19.6% of dairies. Temporary covers were used on some dairies (51.0%), with filling durations of 1 to 60 d. When temporary covers were not used, structures were filled in no more than 15 d. After structure closure, silage feedout started in 1 to 3. wk (44.4%), 4 to 5. wk (31.4%), or 8 or more wk (24.2%). Future considerations included increasing the silage storage area (55.9%), increasing the number of packing tractors (37.0%), planting brown mid-rib varieties (34.4%), buying a defacer to remove silage (33.1%), and creating drive-over piles (32.6%). Survey results will serve to develop and disseminate targeted information on silage management practices at harvest, packing, covering, and feedout on California's San Joaquin Valley dairies. © 2016 American Dairy Science Association.

Garcia-Munoz A.,CEU Cardenal Herrera University | Vidal G.,University of California Davis | Singh N.,Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University | Silva-del-Rio N.,Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center
Preventive Veterinary Medicine | Year: 2016

Lameness is a critical issue on dairies with an impact on production and animal welfare. Early lameness detection followed by effective treatments could improve prognosis and cure rate of lame cows. Current methods for lameness detection are based on locomotion score (LS) that requires observation of cows walking, preferably at the exit of the milking parlor. This is a time-consuming task that is difficult to implement on large dairies. Therefore, a common methodology for lameness detection is based on milkers' and cow pushers' observations of cows walking to the milking parlor or standing at the milking stall (MPP). Observation of postural abnormalities predictive of lameness while cows are locked at stanchions (S) can be used as an alternative detection method. The objective of this research was to study the association between postural and gait abnormalities observed with S and MPP methodologies and lameness using LS ≥ 3 as the reference method, as well as to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of those methods as a diagnostic test for lameness. A secondary objective was to describe the type of hoof lesions observed with postural and gait abnormalities detected with LS, MPP, and S methodologies. A cross-sectional study design was performed on 2274 cows from one farm in California (US). Arched back, cow-hocked, wide-stance, and favored-limb postures as well as uneven gait were observed. Both lameness detection methodologies, S and MPP, indicated that arched back and favored-limb were postural abnormalities associated with lameness. However, the epidemiological test characteristics for each of the postures evaluated as a diagnostic test for lameness indicated that both detection methods, S and MPP, had good specificity (> 0.91) but poor sensitivity (0.04-0.39). A convenience sample of 104 cows, selected based on LS > 3, favored-limb, presence of two or more abnormal postures, and gait anomalies with either S or MPP methods, received a hoof examination. Lesions were observed on cows selected by LS (17/24), MPP (21/30), and S (33/60) criteria, suggesting a lack of concordance between lameness detection methodologies and visible hoof lesions. Nevertheless, due to the lack of acceptance of LS as the lameness detection method on large commercial dairies in California, it is imperative that future research evaluates modifications of S and MPP lameness detection techniques, considering hoof lesion as reference method. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.

Blanc C.D.,Pacific Rim Dairy | Van der List M.,Boehringer Ingelheim | Aly S.S.,Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center | Aly S.S.,University of California at Davis | And 4 more authors.
Journal of Dairy Science | Year: 2014

Total serum Ca dynamics and urine pH levels were evaluated after prophylactic treatment of subclinical hypocalcemia after parturition in 33 multiparous Jersey × Holstein crossbreed cows. Cows were blocked according to their calcemic status at the time of treatment [normocalcemic (8.0-9.9mg/dL; n=15) or hypocalcemic (5.0-7.9mg/dL; n=18)] and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: control [no Ca supplementation (n=11)]; intravenous Ca [Ca-IV (n=11), 500mL of 23% calcium gluconate (10.7g of Ca and 17.5g of boric acid as a solubilizing agent; Durvet, Blue Springs, MO)]; or oral Ca [Ca-Oral (n=11), 1 oral bolus (Bovikalc bolus, Boehringer Ingelheim, St. Joseph, MO) containing CaCl2 and CaSO4 (43g of Ca) 2 times 12h apart]. Total serum Ca levels were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, and 48h, and urine pH was evaluated at 0, 1, 12, 24, 36, and 48h after treatment initiation. Total serum Ca levels were higher for Ca-IV than for control and Ca-Oral cows at 1, 2, and 4h after treatment initiation, but lower than Ca-Oral cows at 20, 24, and 36h and lower than control cows at 36 and 48h. At 1h after treatment initiation, when serum Ca levels for Ca-IV cows peaked (11.4mg/dL), a greater proportion of Ca-IV (n=8) cows had total serum Ca levels >10mg/dL than control (n=0) and Ca-Oral (n=1) cows. At 24h after treatment initiation, when Ca-IV cows reached the total serum Ca nadir (6.4mg/dL), a greater proportion of Ca-IV (n=10) cows had serum Ca levels <8mg/dL than control (n=5) and Ca-Oral (n=2) cows. Treatment, time, and treatment × time interaction were significant for urine pH. Mean urine pH was lower for Ca-Oral cows (6.69) than for control (7.52) and Ca-IV (7.19) cows. Urine pH levels at 1h after treatment were lower for Ca-IV cows compared with both control and Ca-Oral cows, a finding likely associated with the iatrogenic administration of boric acid added as a solubilizing agent of the intravenous Ca solution used. At 12, 24, and 36h, urine pH levels were lower for Ca-Oral cows compared with both control and Ca-IV cows. This was expected because the oral Ca supplementation used (Bovikalc) is designed as an acidifying agent. Wide fluctuations in blood Ca were observed after prophylactic intravenous Ca supplementation. The implications for milk production and animal health, if any, of these transient changes in total serum Ca have yet to be evaluated. © 2014 American Dairy Science Association.

Arruda A.G.,University of Minnesota | Godden S.,University of Minnesota | Rapnicki P.,University of Minnesota | Gorden P.,Iowa State University | And 7 more authors.
Journal of Dairy Science | Year: 2013

The objective of this randomized noninferiority clinical trial was to compare the effect of treatment with 3 different dry cow therapy formulations at dry-off on cow-level health and production parameters in the first 100. d in milk (DIM) in the subsequent lactation, including 305-d mature-equivalent (305ME) milk production, linear score (LS), risk for the cow experiencing a clinical mastitis event, risk for culling or death, and risk for pregnancy by 100 DIM. A total of 1,091 cows from 6 commercial dairy herds in 4 states (California, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) were randomly assigned at dry-off to receive treatment with 1 of 3 commercial products: Quartermaster (QT; Zoetis Animal Health, Madison, NJ), Spectramast DC (SP; Zoetis Animal Health) or ToMorrow Dry Cow (TM; Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St Joseph, MO). All clinical mastitis, pregnancy, culling, and death events occurring in the first 100 DIM were recorded by farm staff using an on-farm electronic record-keeping system. Dairy Herd Improvement Association test-day records of milk production and milk component testing were retrieved electronically. Mixed linear regression analysis was used to describe the effect of treatment on 305ME milk production and LS recorded on the last Dairy Herd Improvement Association test day before 100 DIM. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to describe the effect of treatment on risk for experiencing a case of clinical mastitis, risk for leaving the herd, and risk for pregnancy between calving and 100 DIM. Results showed no effect of treatment on adjusted mean 305ME milk production (QT = 11,759. kg, SP = 11,574. kg, and TM = 11,761. kg) or adjusted mean LS (QT = 1.8, SP = 1.9, and TM = 1.6) on the last test day before 100 DIM. Similarly, no effect of treatment was observed on risk for a clinical mastitis event (QT = 14.8%, SP = 12.7%, and TM = 15.0%), risk for leaving the herd (QT = 7.5%, SP = 9.2%, and TM = 10.3%), or risk for pregnancy (QT = 31.5%, SP = 26.1%, and TM = 26.9%) between calving and 100 DIM. © 2013 American Dairy Science Association.

Discover hidden collaborations