Charlotte, NC, United States
Charlotte, NC, United States
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

LOS ANGELES, May 23, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Lundin Law PC, a shareholder rights firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against United Technologies Corporation (“United Technologies” or the “Company”) (NYSE:UTX) concerning possible violations of federal securities laws between April 21, 2015 and July 20, 2015 inclusive (the “Class Period”). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares during the Class Period should contact the firm prior to the July 11, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline. To participate in this class action lawsuit, click here. You can also call Brian Lundin, Esq., of Lundin Law PC, at 888-713-1033, or e-mail him at brian@lundinlawpc.com. No class has been certified in the above action yet. Until a class is certified, you are not considered represented by an attorney. You may also choose to do nothing and be an absent class member. According to the Complaint, during the Class Period, United Technologies issued and reaffirmed unfounded and inflated earnings guidance, primarily based on the planning assumptions in two of the Company’s key business units: UTC Aerospace Systems (“UTAS”) and Otis Elevator Co. (“Otis”). United Technologies failed to disclose or indicate that its earnings forecast relied on planning assumptions for the UTAS and Otis units that were not fully scrutinized and were too aggressive. On July 21, 2015, the Company cut its 2015 earnings guidance, based on the weak performance of the UTAS and Otis units. When this news was announced, the Company’s stock price dropped materially, which caused investors harm. Lundin Law PC was established by Brian Lundin, a securities litigator based in Los Angeles dedicated to upholding shareholders’ rights. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethics rules.


NEW YORK, May 12, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) announces that on May 12, 2017, it filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of its client FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG (“FT Lux”) against United Technologies Corporation (“United Technologies” or the “Company”) (NYSE:UTX), and certain of its senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”).  The action, which is captioned FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG v. United Technologies Corporation, No. 17-cv-3570 (S.D.N.Y.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies between April 21, 2015 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”). United Technologies is a manufacturer and servicer of high-technology products, including aircraft components, elevators, escalators, air-conditioning units, and military-missile systems.  The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants violated provisions of the Exchange Act by issuing and reaffirming unfounded and inflated earnings guidance, primarily based on the planning assumptions in two of the Company’s key business units: UTC Aerospace Systems (“UTAS”) and Otis Elevator Co. (“Otis”).  Defendants’ Class Period representations were materially false and misleading because Defendants failed to disclose or indicate that United Technologies’ earnings forecast relied on planning assumptions for the UTAS and Otis units that were not fully scrutinized and were far too aggressive. On July 21, 2015, the Company cut its 2015 earnings guidance on the basis of weak performance by the UTAS and Otis units.  In reaction to these revelations, UTX stock lost hundreds of millions of dollars in market capitalization, with the Company’s stock price falling from a Class Period high of $119.14 per share on May 14, 2015, to close at $102.71 per share on July 21, 2015. If you purchased or acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies during the Class Period, you are a member of the “Class” and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff.  Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York no later than July 11, 2017.  The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class.  You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action.  If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member.  You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action. If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Francis P. McConville, Esq. of Labaton Sucharow, at (800) 321-0476, or via email at fmcconville@labaton.com. You can view a copy of the complaint online at http://www.labaton.com/en/cases/Frankfurt-Trust-Investment-Luxemburg-AG-v-United-Technologies-Corporation.cfm. FT-Lux is represented by Labaton Sucharow, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $2 trillion.  Labaton Sucharow’s litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than 60 full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants.  Labaton Sucharow has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications.  Offices are located in New York, NY and Wilmington, DE.  More information about Labaton Sucharow is available at www.labaton.com.


In this report, the global Full Ice Protection Systems market is valued at USD XX million in 2016 and is expected to reach USD XX million by the end of 2022, growing at a CAGR of XX% between 2016 and 2022. Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), market share and growth rate of Full Ice Protection Systems in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com Global Full Ice Protection Systems market competition by top manufacturers, with production, price, revenue (value) and market share for each manufacturer; the top players including UTC Aerospace Systems Zodiac Aerotechnics Cavice Protection Honeywell Curtiss-Wright B/E Aerospace ITT Corporation Kilfrost Cox & Company Meggitt Ultra Electronics On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into De-Icing Systems Anti-Icing Systems On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate of Full Ice Protection Systems for each application, including Civil Military Global Full Ice Protection Systems Market Research Report 2017 1 Full Ice Protection Systems Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Full Ice Protection Systems 1.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Segment by Type (Product Category) 1.2.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Production and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (Product Category) (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Production Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 De-Icing Systems 1.2.4 Anti-Icing Systems 1.3 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Segment by Application 1.3.1 Full Ice Protection Systems Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Civil 1.3.3 Military 1.4 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Market by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Market Size (Value) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Full Ice Protection Systems (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Revenue Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.1.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.1.2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Production and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.3 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Average Price by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.4 Manufacturers Full Ice Protection Systems Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type 2.5 Full Ice Protection Systems Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Full Ice Protection Systems Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers 2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 7 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 UTC Aerospace Systems 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Product A 7.1.2.2 Product B 7.1.3 UTC Aerospace Systems Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Zodiac Aerotechnics 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Product A 7.2.2.2 Product B 7.2.3 Zodiac Aerotechnics Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Cavice Protection 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Product A 7.3.2.2 Product B 7.3.3 Cavice Protection Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Honeywell 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Product A 7.4.2.2 Product B 7.4.3 Honeywell Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Curtiss-Wright 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Product A 7.5.2.2 Product B 7.5.3 Curtiss-Wright Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 B/E Aerospace 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Product A 7.6.2.2 Product B 7.6.3 B/E Aerospace Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 ITT Corporation 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Product A 7.7.2.2 Product B 7.7.3 ITT Corporation Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 Kilfrost 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Product A 7.8.2.2 Product B 7.8.3 Kilfrost Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Cox & Company 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Product A 7.9.2.2 Product B 7.9.3 Cox & Company Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com ABOUT US: Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports features an exhaustive list of market research reports from hundreds of publishers worldwide. We boast a database spanning virtually every market category and an even more comprehensive collection of rmaket research reports under these categories and sub-categories. For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com


NEW YORK, May 12, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) announces that on May 12, 2017, it filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of its client FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG (“FT Lux”) against United Technologies Corporation (“United Technologies” or the “Company”) (NYSE:UTX), and certain of its senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”).  The action, which is captioned FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG v. United Technologies Corporation, No. 17-cv-3570 (S.D.N.Y.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies between April 21, 2015 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”). United Technologies is a manufacturer and servicer of high-technology products, including aircraft components, elevators, escalators, air-conditioning units, and military-missile systems.  The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants violated provisions of the Exchange Act by issuing and reaffirming unfounded and inflated earnings guidance, primarily based on the planning assumptions in two of the Company’s key business units: UTC Aerospace Systems (“UTAS”) and Otis Elevator Co. (“Otis”).  Defendants’ Class Period representations were materially false and misleading because Defendants failed to disclose or indicate that United Technologies’ earnings forecast relied on planning assumptions for the UTAS and Otis units that were not fully scrutinized and were far too aggressive. On July 21, 2015, the Company cut its 2015 earnings guidance on the basis of weak performance by the UTAS and Otis units.  In reaction to these revelations, UTX stock lost hundreds of millions of dollars in market capitalization, with the Company’s stock price falling from a Class Period high of $119.14 per share on May 14, 2015, to close at $102.71 per share on July 21, 2015. If you purchased or acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies during the Class Period, you are a member of the “Class” and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff.  Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York no later than July 11, 2017.  The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class.  You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action.  If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member.  You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action. If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Francis P. McConville, Esq. of Labaton Sucharow, at (800) 321-0476, or via email at fmcconville@labaton.com. You can view a copy of the complaint online at http://www.labaton.com/en/cases/Frankfurt-Trust-Investment-Luxemburg-AG-v-United-Technologies-Corporation.cfm. FT-Lux is represented by Labaton Sucharow, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $2 trillion.  Labaton Sucharow’s litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than 60 full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants.  Labaton Sucharow has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications.  Offices are located in New York, NY and Wilmington, DE.  More information about Labaton Sucharow is available at www.labaton.com.


Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis of Top Key Player Forecast To 2022” To Its Research Database Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings market competition by top manufacturers, with production, price, revenue (value) and market share for each manufacturer; the top players including Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1273088-global-aircraft-drive-shaft-and-couplings-market-research-report-2017 Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), market share and growth rate of Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Universal Joints Oldham Coupling Flexible Shafts Others On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate of Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings for each application, including OEM Aftermarket If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want. Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Market Research Report 2017 1 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings 1.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Segment by Type (Product Category) 1.2.1 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Production and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (Product Category) (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Production Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 Universal Joints 1.2.4 Oldham Coupling 1.2.5 Flexible Shafts 1.2.6 Others 1.3 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Segment by Application 1.3.1 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 OEM 1.3.3 Aftermarket 1.4 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Market by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.1 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Market Size (Value) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Revenue Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 7 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Kaman 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Product A 7.1.2.2 Product B 7.1.3 Kaman Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 GKN Aerospace 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Product A 7.2.2.2 Product B 7.2.3 GKN Aerospace Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 UTC Aerospace Systems 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Product A 7.3.2.2 Product B 7.3.3 UTC Aerospace Systems Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Pankl Racing Systems (Pankl) 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Product A 7.4.2.2 Product B 7.4.3 Pankl Racing Systems (Pankl) Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Northstar Aerospace 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Product A 7.5.2.2 Product B 7.5.3 Northstar Aerospace Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 SDP/SI-Stock Drive Products / Sterling Instrument 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Product A 7.6.2.2 Product B 7.6.3 SDP/SI-Stock Drive Products / Sterling Instrument Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Altra Industrial Motion 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Product A 7.7.2.2 Product B 7.7.3 Altra Industrial Motion Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 Regal Beloit Americas, Inc. 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Product A 7.8.2.2 Product B 7.8.3 Regal Beloit Americas, Inc. Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Product A 7.9.2.2 Product B 7.9.3 General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 Lawrie Technology, Inc. 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Product A 7.10.2.2 Product B 7.10.3 Lawrie Technology, Inc. Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 HUBER+SUHNER 7.12 SS White Aerospace 7.13 Umbra Cuscinetti S.p.A. For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1273088-global-aircraft-drive-shaft-and-couplings-market-research-report-2017


NEW YORK, May 12, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) announces that on May 12, 2017, it filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of its client FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG (“FT Lux”) against United Technologies Corporation (“United Technologies” or the “Company”) (NYSE:UTX), and certain of its senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”).  The action, which is captioned FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG v. United Technologies Corporation, No. 17-cv-3570 (S.D.N.Y.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies between April 21, 2015 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”). United Technologies is a manufacturer and servicer of high-technology products, including aircraft components, elevators, escalators, air-conditioning units, and military-missile systems.  The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants violated provisions of the Exchange Act by issuing and reaffirming unfounded and inflated earnings guidance, primarily based on the planning assumptions in two of the Company’s key business units: UTC Aerospace Systems (“UTAS”) and Otis Elevator Co. (“Otis”).  Defendants’ Class Period representations were materially false and misleading because Defendants failed to disclose or indicate that United Technologies’ earnings forecast relied on planning assumptions for the UTAS and Otis units that were not fully scrutinized and were far too aggressive. On July 21, 2015, the Company cut its 2015 earnings guidance on the basis of weak performance by the UTAS and Otis units.  In reaction to these revelations, UTX stock lost hundreds of millions of dollars in market capitalization, with the Company’s stock price falling from a Class Period high of $119.14 per share on May 14, 2015, to close at $102.71 per share on July 21, 2015. If you purchased or acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies during the Class Period, you are a member of the “Class” and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff.  Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York no later than July 11, 2017.  The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class.  You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action.  If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member.  You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action. If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Francis P. McConville, Esq. of Labaton Sucharow, at (800) 321-0476, or via email at fmcconville@labaton.com. You can view a copy of the complaint online at http://www.labaton.com/en/cases/Frankfurt-Trust-Investment-Luxemburg-AG-v-United-Technologies-Corporation.cfm. FT-Lux is represented by Labaton Sucharow, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $2 trillion.  Labaton Sucharow’s litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than 60 full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants.  Labaton Sucharow has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications.  Offices are located in New York, NY and Wilmington, DE.  More information about Labaton Sucharow is available at www.labaton.com.


News Article | May 8, 2017
Site: www.prnewswire.com

·         The aerostructures market is projected to grow from USD 52.17 billion in 2016 to USD 75.97 billion by 2022, at a CAGR of 6.47% during the forecast period. ·         The growth of this market is mainly attributed to the rise in aircraft deliveries in the commercial and general aviation sectors. ·         "The empennage segment is projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period" ·         North America is expected to lead the aerostructures market from 2016 to 2022. Countries considered for market analysis in the North American region include the U.S. and Canada. "Increase in outsourcing of aerostructure manufacturing to tier 1 and tier 2 suppliers is one of the key factors expected to drive the growth of the market" The aerostructures market is projected to grow from USD 52.17 billion in 2016 to USD 75.97 billion by 2022, at a CAGR of 6.47% during the forecast period. The growth of this market is mainly attributed to the rise in aircraft deliveries in the commercial and general aviation sectors. In addition, outsourcing of aerostructure manufacturing by major OEMs to tier 1 and tier 2 suppliers is further anticipated to drive the growth of the aerostructures market. However, recyclability issues associated with composite materials are restraining the growth of the market. "The empennage segment is projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period" Based on component, the aerostructures market has been segmented into fuselage, empennage, flight control surfaces, wings, nose, and nacelle and pylon, among others. The empennage segment is projected to grow at the highest CAGR from 2016 to 2022. This growth is mainly attributed to the increasing usage of composite materials in the manufacture of empennage. "The composites segment led the aerostructures market in 2016" Based on material, the composites segment led the aerostructures market in 2016. Increasing adoption of composite aerostructures by the commercial and general aviation sectors is expected to drive the growth of the composites segment. "North America is expected to lead the aerostructures market during the forecast period" North America is expected to lead the aerostructures market from 2016 to 2022. Countries considered for market analysis in the North American region include the U.S. and Canada. The general and commercial aviation sectors in North America have witnessed considerable growth over the past few years, owing to increase in aircraft deliveries. In addition, the presence of leading manufacturers of aerostructures such as UTC Aerospace Systems (U.S.), Triumph Group, Inc. (U.S.), and AAR Corp. (U.S.) in this region is expected to drive the growth of the aerostructures market in North America. Break-up of profile of primary participants in the aerostructures market: • By Company Type - Tier 1 – 35%, Tier 2 – 45%, and Tier 3 – 20% • By Designation – C Level – 35%, Director Level – 25%, and Others – 40% • By Region – North America - 45%, Europe – 20%, Asia-Pacific – 30%, and RoW – 5% Major companies operating in the aerostructures market include UTC Aerospace Systems (U.S.), Leonardo S.p.A. (Italy), Triumph Group, Inc. (U.S.), RUAG Holding AG (Switzerland), Saab AB (Sweden), Cyient Limited (India), and AAR Corp. (U.S.), among others. Research Coverage: This research report categorizes the aerostructures market based on component (fuselage, empennage, flight control surfaces, wings, nose, and nacelle and pylon, among others), material (composites, alloys, and metals), end-use (OEMs and aftermarket), and platform (rotary wing aircraft and fixed wing aircraft). These segments and subsegments have been analyzed across major regions, namely, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest of the World (RoW). Reasons to buy this report: From an insight perspective, this research report focuses on various levels of analyses — industry analysis (industry trends), company profiles, emerging and high-growth segments of the market, high-growth regions, and market drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges. The report provides insights on the following pointers: • Market Penetration: Comprehensive information on aerostructures offered by top players in the aerostructures market • Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on upcoming technologies, research & development activities, and major contracts in the aerostructures market • Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets – the report analyzes the aerostructures market across various regions • Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the aerostructures market • Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, products, and manufacturing capabilities of leading players in the aerostructures market Read the full report: http://www.reportlinker.com/p04877073/Aerostructures-Market-by-Component-Fuselage-Empennage-Flight-Control-Surfaces-Wings-Nose-Nacelle-Pylon-Material-Composite-Alloys-Metals-End-Use-OEM-Aftermarket-Platform-Fixed-Rotary-Wing-and-Region-Global-Forecast-to.html About Reportlinker ReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place. http://www.reportlinker.com __________________________ Contact Clare: clare@reportlinker.com US: (339)-368-6001 Intl: +1 339-368-6001 To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-aero-structures-market-is-projected-to-grow-to-usd-7597-billion-by-2022-300453294.html


NEW YORK, May 12, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) announces that on May 12, 2017, it filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of its client FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG (“FT Lux”) against United Technologies Corporation (“United Technologies” or the “Company”) (NYSE:UTX), and certain of its senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”).  The action, which is captioned FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG v. United Technologies Corporation, No. 17-cv-3570 (S.D.N.Y.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies between April 21, 2015 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”). United Technologies is a manufacturer and servicer of high-technology products, including aircraft components, elevators, escalators, air-conditioning units, and military-missile systems.  The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants violated provisions of the Exchange Act by issuing and reaffirming unfounded and inflated earnings guidance, primarily based on the planning assumptions in two of the Company’s key business units: UTC Aerospace Systems (“UTAS”) and Otis Elevator Co. (“Otis”).  Defendants’ Class Period representations were materially false and misleading because Defendants failed to disclose or indicate that United Technologies’ earnings forecast relied on planning assumptions for the UTAS and Otis units that were not fully scrutinized and were far too aggressive. On July 21, 2015, the Company cut its 2015 earnings guidance on the basis of weak performance by the UTAS and Otis units.  In reaction to these revelations, UTX stock lost hundreds of millions of dollars in market capitalization, with the Company’s stock price falling from a Class Period high of $119.14 per share on May 14, 2015, to close at $102.71 per share on July 21, 2015. If you purchased or acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies during the Class Period, you are a member of the “Class” and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff.  Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York no later than July 11, 2017.  The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class.  You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action.  If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member.  You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action. If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Francis P. McConville, Esq. of Labaton Sucharow, at (800) 321-0476, or via email at fmcconville@labaton.com. You can view a copy of the complaint online at http://www.labaton.com/en/cases/Frankfurt-Trust-Investment-Luxemburg-AG-v-United-Technologies-Corporation.cfm. FT-Lux is represented by Labaton Sucharow, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $2 trillion.  Labaton Sucharow’s litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than 60 full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants.  Labaton Sucharow has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications.  Offices are located in New York, NY and Wilmington, DE.  More information about Labaton Sucharow is available at www.labaton.com.


NEW YORK, May 12, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) announces that on May 12, 2017, it filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of its client FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG (“FT Lux”) against United Technologies Corporation (“United Technologies” or the “Company”) (NYSE:UTX), and certain of its senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”).  The action, which is captioned FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG v. United Technologies Corporation, No. 17-cv-3570 (S.D.N.Y.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies between April 21, 2015 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”). United Technologies is a manufacturer and servicer of high-technology products, including aircraft components, elevators, escalators, air-conditioning units, and military-missile systems.  The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants violated provisions of the Exchange Act by issuing and reaffirming unfounded and inflated earnings guidance, primarily based on the planning assumptions in two of the Company’s key business units: UTC Aerospace Systems (“UTAS”) and Otis Elevator Co. (“Otis”).  Defendants’ Class Period representations were materially false and misleading because Defendants failed to disclose or indicate that United Technologies’ earnings forecast relied on planning assumptions for the UTAS and Otis units that were not fully scrutinized and were far too aggressive. On July 21, 2015, the Company cut its 2015 earnings guidance on the basis of weak performance by the UTAS and Otis units.  In reaction to these revelations, UTX stock lost hundreds of millions of dollars in market capitalization, with the Company’s stock price falling from a Class Period high of $119.14 per share on May 14, 2015, to close at $102.71 per share on July 21, 2015. If you purchased or acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies during the Class Period, you are a member of the “Class” and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff.  Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York no later than July 11, 2017.  The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class.  You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action.  If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member.  You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action. If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Francis P. McConville, Esq. of Labaton Sucharow, at (800) 321-0476, or via email at fmcconville@labaton.com. You can view a copy of the complaint online at http://www.labaton.com/en/cases/Frankfurt-Trust-Investment-Luxemburg-AG-v-United-Technologies-Corporation.cfm. FT-Lux is represented by Labaton Sucharow, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $2 trillion.  Labaton Sucharow’s litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than 60 full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants.  Labaton Sucharow has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications.  Offices are located in New York, NY and Wilmington, DE.  More information about Labaton Sucharow is available at www.labaton.com.


News Article | May 10, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Air Data Systems -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis of Top Key Player Forecast To 2022” To Its Research Database According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Air Data Systems market is accounted for $548.7 million in 2015 and is expected to reach $850.9 million by 2022 growing at a CAGR of 6.4% from 2015 to 2022. Factors such as demand for large military UAVs, demand for narrow body aircraft, technological advancement in Air Data computers are driving the market growth. However, long life cycle of aircraft flight control system and high cost associated with new technology are impeding the market growth. Introduction of advanced ads in fighter aircraft, growth in international tourism and emergence of aircraft manufacturers in Asia-Pacific and Latin America are providing diverse opportunities for the market to proliferate. The UAV segment is projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. The electronic unit segment is the highest growing market because of wider use in avionics systems. North America is projected to lead the Air Data Systems market due to growing military programs for fighter jets. Some of the key players in global Air Data Systems market are Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Aeroprobe Corporation, Astronautics Corporation of America, Ametek Inc., Meggitt PLC ,Rockwell Collins, Inc., Shadin Avionics, Honeywell International Inc. ,Thommen Aircraft Equipment, United Technologies Corporation, Ikusi S.A, Resa Airport Data Systems, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Thales Avionics, Sagem Défense Sécurité (Sagem),Optical Air Data Systems, LLC,UTC Aerospace Systems, GE Aviation, Rolls-Royce and CFM International. Regions Covered: • North America o US o Canada o Mexico • Europe o Germany o France o Italy o UK o Spain o Rest of Europe • Asia Pacific o Japan o China o India o Australia o New Zealand o Rest of Asia Pacific • Rest of the World o Middle East o Brazil o Argentina o South Africa o Egypt What our report offers: - Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments - Market share analysis of the top industry players - Strategic recommendations for the new entrants - Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets - Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations) - Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations - Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends - Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments - Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/959906-air-data-systems-global-market-outlook-2016-2022

Loading UTC Aerospace Systems collaborators
Loading UTC Aerospace Systems collaborators