Charlotte, NC, United States
Charlotte, NC, United States

Time filter

Source Type

In this report, the global Full Ice Protection Systems market is valued at USD XX million in 2016 and is expected to reach USD XX million by the end of 2022, growing at a CAGR of XX% between 2016 and 2022. Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), market share and growth rate of Full Ice Protection Systems in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com Global Full Ice Protection Systems market competition by top manufacturers, with production, price, revenue (value) and market share for each manufacturer; the top players including UTC Aerospace Systems Zodiac Aerotechnics Cavice Protection Honeywell Curtiss-Wright B/E Aerospace ITT Corporation Kilfrost Cox & Company Meggitt Ultra Electronics On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into De-Icing Systems Anti-Icing Systems On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate of Full Ice Protection Systems for each application, including Civil Military Global Full Ice Protection Systems Market Research Report 2017 1 Full Ice Protection Systems Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Full Ice Protection Systems 1.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Segment by Type (Product Category) 1.2.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Production and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (Product Category) (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Production Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 De-Icing Systems 1.2.4 Anti-Icing Systems 1.3 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Segment by Application 1.3.1 Full Ice Protection Systems Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Civil 1.3.3 Military 1.4 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Market by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Market Size (Value) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Full Ice Protection Systems (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Revenue Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.1.1 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.1.2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Production and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.2 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.3 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Average Price by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.4 Manufacturers Full Ice Protection Systems Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type 2.5 Full Ice Protection Systems Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Full Ice Protection Systems Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers 2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 7 Global Full Ice Protection Systems Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 UTC Aerospace Systems 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Product A 7.1.2.2 Product B 7.1.3 UTC Aerospace Systems Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Zodiac Aerotechnics 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Product A 7.2.2.2 Product B 7.2.3 Zodiac Aerotechnics Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Cavice Protection 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Product A 7.3.2.2 Product B 7.3.3 Cavice Protection Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Honeywell 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Product A 7.4.2.2 Product B 7.4.3 Honeywell Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Curtiss-Wright 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Product A 7.5.2.2 Product B 7.5.3 Curtiss-Wright Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 B/E Aerospace 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Product A 7.6.2.2 Product B 7.6.3 B/E Aerospace Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 ITT Corporation 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Product A 7.7.2.2 Product B 7.7.3 ITT Corporation Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 Kilfrost 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Product A 7.8.2.2 Product B 7.8.3 Kilfrost Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Cox & Company 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Full Ice Protection Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Product A 7.9.2.2 Product B 7.9.3 Cox & Company Full Ice Protection Systems Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com ABOUT US: Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports features an exhaustive list of market research reports from hundreds of publishers worldwide. We boast a database spanning virtually every market category and an even more comprehensive collection of rmaket research reports under these categories and sub-categories. For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com


NEW YORK, May 12, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) announces that on May 12, 2017, it filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of its client FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG (“FT Lux”) against United Technologies Corporation (“United Technologies” or the “Company”) (NYSE:UTX), and certain of its senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”).  The action, which is captioned FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG v. United Technologies Corporation, No. 17-cv-3570 (S.D.N.Y.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies between April 21, 2015 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”). United Technologies is a manufacturer and servicer of high-technology products, including aircraft components, elevators, escalators, air-conditioning units, and military-missile systems.  The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants violated provisions of the Exchange Act by issuing and reaffirming unfounded and inflated earnings guidance, primarily based on the planning assumptions in two of the Company’s key business units: UTC Aerospace Systems (“UTAS”) and Otis Elevator Co. (“Otis”).  Defendants’ Class Period representations were materially false and misleading because Defendants failed to disclose or indicate that United Technologies’ earnings forecast relied on planning assumptions for the UTAS and Otis units that were not fully scrutinized and were far too aggressive. On July 21, 2015, the Company cut its 2015 earnings guidance on the basis of weak performance by the UTAS and Otis units.  In reaction to these revelations, UTX stock lost hundreds of millions of dollars in market capitalization, with the Company’s stock price falling from a Class Period high of $119.14 per share on May 14, 2015, to close at $102.71 per share on July 21, 2015. If you purchased or acquired the publicly traded securities of United Technologies during the Class Period, you are a member of the “Class” and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff.  Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York no later than July 11, 2017.  The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class.  You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action.  If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member.  You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action. If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Francis P. McConville, Esq. of Labaton Sucharow, at (800) 321-0476, or via email at fmcconville@labaton.com. You can view a copy of the complaint online at http://www.labaton.com/en/cases/Frankfurt-Trust-Investment-Luxemburg-AG-v-United-Technologies-Corporation.cfm. FT-Lux is represented by Labaton Sucharow, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $2 trillion.  Labaton Sucharow’s litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than 60 full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants.  Labaton Sucharow has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications.  Offices are located in New York, NY and Wilmington, DE.  More information about Labaton Sucharow is available at www.labaton.com.


Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis of Top Key Player Forecast To 2022” To Its Research Database Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings market competition by top manufacturers, with production, price, revenue (value) and market share for each manufacturer; the top players including Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1273088-global-aircraft-drive-shaft-and-couplings-market-research-report-2017 Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), market share and growth rate of Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Universal Joints Oldham Coupling Flexible Shafts Others On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate of Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings for each application, including OEM Aftermarket If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want. Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Market Research Report 2017 1 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings 1.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Segment by Type (Product Category) 1.2.1 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Production and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (Product Category) (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Production Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 Universal Joints 1.2.4 Oldham Coupling 1.2.5 Flexible Shafts 1.2.6 Others 1.3 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Segment by Application 1.3.1 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 OEM 1.3.3 Aftermarket 1.4 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Market by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.1 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Market Size (Value) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Revenue Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 7 Global Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Kaman 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Product A 7.1.2.2 Product B 7.1.3 Kaman Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 GKN Aerospace 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Product A 7.2.2.2 Product B 7.2.3 GKN Aerospace Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 UTC Aerospace Systems 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Product A 7.3.2.2 Product B 7.3.3 UTC Aerospace Systems Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Pankl Racing Systems (Pankl) 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Product A 7.4.2.2 Product B 7.4.3 Pankl Racing Systems (Pankl) Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Northstar Aerospace 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Product A 7.5.2.2 Product B 7.5.3 Northstar Aerospace Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 SDP/SI-Stock Drive Products / Sterling Instrument 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Product A 7.6.2.2 Product B 7.6.3 SDP/SI-Stock Drive Products / Sterling Instrument Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Altra Industrial Motion 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Product A 7.7.2.2 Product B 7.7.3 Altra Industrial Motion Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 Regal Beloit Americas, Inc. 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Product A 7.8.2.2 Product B 7.8.3 Regal Beloit Americas, Inc. Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Product A 7.9.2.2 Product B 7.9.3 General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 Lawrie Technology, Inc. 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Product Category, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Product A 7.10.2.2 Product B 7.10.3 Lawrie Technology, Inc. Aircraft Drive Shaft And Couplings Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 HUBER+SUHNER 7.12 SS White Aerospace 7.13 Umbra Cuscinetti S.p.A. For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1273088-global-aircraft-drive-shaft-and-couplings-market-research-report-2017


News Article | May 10, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Air Data Systems -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis of Top Key Player Forecast To 2022” To Its Research Database According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Air Data Systems market is accounted for $548.7 million in 2015 and is expected to reach $850.9 million by 2022 growing at a CAGR of 6.4% from 2015 to 2022. Factors such as demand for large military UAVs, demand for narrow body aircraft, technological advancement in Air Data computers are driving the market growth. However, long life cycle of aircraft flight control system and high cost associated with new technology are impeding the market growth. Introduction of advanced ads in fighter aircraft, growth in international tourism and emergence of aircraft manufacturers in Asia-Pacific and Latin America are providing diverse opportunities for the market to proliferate. The UAV segment is projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. The electronic unit segment is the highest growing market because of wider use in avionics systems. North America is projected to lead the Air Data Systems market due to growing military programs for fighter jets. Some of the key players in global Air Data Systems market are Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Aeroprobe Corporation, Astronautics Corporation of America, Ametek Inc., Meggitt PLC ,Rockwell Collins, Inc., Shadin Avionics, Honeywell International Inc. ,Thommen Aircraft Equipment, United Technologies Corporation, Ikusi S.A, Resa Airport Data Systems, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Thales Avionics, Sagem Défense Sécurité (Sagem),Optical Air Data Systems, LLC,UTC Aerospace Systems, GE Aviation, Rolls-Royce and CFM International. Regions Covered: • North America o US o Canada o Mexico • Europe o Germany o France o Italy o UK o Spain o Rest of Europe • Asia Pacific o Japan o China o India o Australia o New Zealand o Rest of Asia Pacific • Rest of the World o Middle East o Brazil o Argentina o South Africa o Egypt What our report offers: - Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments - Market share analysis of the top industry players - Strategic recommendations for the new entrants - Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets - Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations) - Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations - Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends - Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments - Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/959906-air-data-systems-global-market-outlook-2016-2022


News Article | May 6, 2017
Site: news.yahoo.com

SHANGHAI (Reuters) - China's home-grown C919 passenger jet completed its long-delayed maiden flight on Friday, a major first step for Beijing as it looks to raise its profile in the global aviation market and boost high-tech manufacturing at home. Under overcast skies, the white, green and blue aircraft, with "C919" emblazoned on its tail, touched down at Shanghai's international airport after an 80-minute flight to cheers from thousands of dignitaries, aviation workers and enthusiasts. The jet is a symbol of China's ambitions to muscle into a global jet market estimated to be worth $2 trillion over the next two decades, as well as of Beijing's broader "Made in China 2025" plan to spur home-made products, from medicines to robots. "Seeing the C919 take off into the sky made me quite emotional. This is a moment we have waited to see for a very long time," Wang Mingfeng, 42, who witnessed the maiden flight at the Shanghai airport, told Reuters. "I believe that in the not too distant future, we will be neck-and-neck with Boeing and Airbus." At the moment, though, Boeing and Airbus remain far ahead in terms of sales, technical know-how and order books. And the C919, whose test flight was pushed back at least twice since 2014 due to production issues, may need years of tests to get certified in China, as well as in the United States and Europe. On Friday, the C919 flew north over the Yangtze River delta, carried out maneuvers and then returned south along the coast before landing, according to aircraft tracker Flightradar24. State media said the plane flew at around 3,000 meters and at speeds of 290-300 kilometers (180-186 miles) per hour. The crew of five pilots and engineers, all wearing orange jump suits and aviators, were applauded as they disembarked. The plane, which can carry 158-168 passengers, had no passenger seats installed for the maiden flight. A letter from China's ministerial cabinet, read out after the plane landed, said the successful flight marked a "major breakthrough" and milestone for China's passenger jet industry. The industry ministry said in a statement the flight went smoothly and that all the systems functioned properly. The C919, made by state-owned Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (COMAC) [CMAFC.UL], relies on overseas technology from firms including General Electric , France's Safran , Honeywell International Inc and United Technologies Corp subsidiary UTC Aerospace Systems. China Eastern Airlines <600115.SS> is the launch customer for the plane, which COMAC says has 570 orders from 23 customers. Conceived in 2008, China wants the C919 to eventually take market share from Boeing and Airbus in the lucrative narrow-body market which accounts for more than 50 percent of the aircraft in service worldwide. For a TIMELINE on the C919, click "Every year we spend billions on buying planes," a COMAC promotional video showed President Xi Jinping saying during a site visit. He added China should become more self-reliant. However, the jet likely faces a lengthy journey from first flight to commercial usage. China's first home-made jet, the regional ARJ-21, received its type certification in December 2014, six years after its first flight and more than 12 years after it was conceived. It made its maiden passenger flight in June last year. Then there is also the daunting task of selling the jet in a global market dominated by Boeing and Airbus. "Aviation is a complex market and you need experience over a long time. Boeing has 100 years, Airbus has over 40 years," said Sinolink Securities analyst Si Jingzhe, adding COMAC still lagged far behind in terms of supply chain know-how. China is aware the path won't be easy. On a media visit on Thursday to COMAC's C919 assembly plant less than 10 kilometers from the airport, large red banners could be seen in giant hangars calling for long-term "hardship", "dedication" and "struggle" to meet the firm's goals. China is pushing for recognition globally of its certification by European and U.S. regulators as without their certification, it would only be able to sell the jet to a handful of countries that accept its certification standards. But Beijing is already looking beyond the C919, with plans to develop a wide-body long-haul jet with Russia. In November COMAC and its partner United Aircraft Corp said they have started the hunt to find suppliers.


Wiseguyreports.com adds “Aerospace Lavatory Systems -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis of Top Key Player Forecast To 2022” to its research database. Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems market competition by top manufacturers/players, with Aerospace Lavatory Systems sales volume, Price (USD/Unit), revenue (Million USD) and market share for each manufacturer/player; the top players including Geographically, this report split global into several key Regions, with sales (K Units), revenue (Million USD), market share and growth rate of Aerospace Lavatory Systems for these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering On the basis of product, this report displays the sales volume (K Units), revenue (Million USD), product price (USD/Unit), market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Reusable Lavatory System Recirculating Lavatory System Vacuum Toilet Lavatory System Other On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, market share and growth rate of Aerospace Lavatory Systems for each application, including Civil Aircraft Military Aircraft Commercial Aircraft Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales Market Report 2017 1 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Aerospace Lavatory Systems 1.2 Classification of Aerospace Lavatory Systems by Product Category 1.2.1 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Market Size (Sales) Comparison by Type (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Market Size (Sales) Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 Reusable Lavatory System 1.2.4 Recirculating Lavatory System 1.2.5 Vacuum Toilet Lavatory System 1.2.6 Other 1.3 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Market by Application/End Users 1.3.1 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales (Volume) and Market Share Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Civil Aircraft 1.3.3 Military Aircraft 1.3.4 Commercial Aircraft 1.4 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Market by Region 1.4.1 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Market Size (Value) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 United States Aerospace Lavatory Systems Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Aerospace Lavatory Systems Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 Europe Aerospace Lavatory Systems Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Aerospace Lavatory Systems Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Aerospace Lavatory Systems Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 India Aerospace Lavatory Systems Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Aerospace Lavatory Systems (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales and Growth Rate (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Revenue and Growth Rate (2012-2022) 9 Global Aerospace Lavatory Systems Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data 9.1 B/E Aerospace 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Product A 9.1.2.2 Product B 9.1.3 B/E Aerospace Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Zodiac Aerospace 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Product A 9.2.2.2 Product B 9.2.3 Zodiac Aerospace Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 Knight Aerospace 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Product A 9.3.2.2 Product B 9.3.3 Knight Aerospace Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 Boeing 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Product A 9.4.2.2 Product B 9.4.3 Boeing Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Franke Aquarotter 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Product A 9.5.2.2 Product B 9.5.3 Franke Aquarotter Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Siemens Aerospace 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 Product A 9.6.2.2 Product B 9.6.3 Siemens Aerospace Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 UTC Aerospace Systems 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 Product A 9.7.2.2 Product B 9.7.3 UTC Aerospace Systems Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Diehl Comfort Modules 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 Product A 9.8.2.2 Product B 9.8.3 Diehl Comfort Modules Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 Jamco Corporation 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.9.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.9.2.1 Product A 9.9.2.2 Product B 9.9.3 Jamco Corporation Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Gulfstream 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.10.2 Aerospace Lavatory Systems Product Category, Application and Specification 9.10.2.1 Product A 9.10.2.2 Product B 9.10.3 Gulfstream Aerospace Lavatory Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.11 Yokohama Rubber For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1079980-global-aerospace-lavatory-systems-sales-market-report-2017


"At UTC Aerospace Systems, we have a broad and deep portfolio of systems-level solutions that enables airframers to build aircraft customized to their customers' unique specifications," said Dave Gitlin, President, UTC Aerospace Systems.  "We are thrilled to see COMAC's tremendous progress, and we congratulate them on the first flight of the C919. We are proud to be onboard." UTC Aerospace Systems' technology can be found throughout the C919. Key systems include: electric power, emergency power, cockpit and thrust controllers, interior and exterior lighting, emergency passenger door actuation, fire protection, and ice detection and prevention. "Our systems expertise, deep industry knowledge and in-country investment have helped us build a strong working relationship with COMAC," added Gitlin. "And we look forward to celebrating many more milestones with COMAC in the future." UTC Aerospace Systems is one of the world's largest suppliers of technologically advanced aerospace and defense products. UTC Aerospace Systems designs, manufactures and services integrated systems and components for the aerospace and defense industries, supporting a global customer base with significant worldwide manufacturing and customer service facilities. For more information about the company, visit our website at www.utcaerospacesystems.com or follow us on Twitter: @utcaerosystems United Technologies Corp., based in Farmington, Connecticut, provides high-technology systems and services to the building and aerospace industries. By combining a passion for science with precision engineering, the company is creating smart, sustainable solutions the world needs. For more information about the company, visit our website at www.utc.com or follow us on Twitter: @UTC To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/from-passenger-safety-and-comfort-to-operational-efficiencies-comac-c919-takes-off-with-utc-aerospace-systems-onboard-300452241.html


News Article | April 26, 2017
Site: www.prnewswire.com

"Our continued execution against our strategic priorities and our investments in innovation are enabling us to meet our financial commitments. We remain fully confident in our 2017 expectations and our 2020 targets. Our portfolio of industry leading franchises is well positioned to create significant and sustainable long-term shareholder value." First quarter GAAP EPS of $1.73 was up 32 cents (23 percent) versus the prior year and included 25 cents of favorable non-recurring significant items net of restructuring. Adjusted EPS of $1.48 was up 1 percent. Sales of $13.8 billion were up 3 percent, driven by 3 points of organic growth and 1 point of net acquisition growth, partially offset by 1 point of adverse foreign exchange. Net income for the quarter was $1.4 billion, up 18 percent versus the prior year. Cash flow from operations for the quarter was $1.0 billion (72 percent of net income attributable to common shareholders) and capital expenditures were $325 million. Free cash flow of $668 million in the quarter was 48 percent of net income attributable to common shareowners. In the quarter, Otis new equipment orders increased 4 percent versus the prior year at constant currency and grew 11 percent excluding China.  Equipment orders at UTC Climate, Controls & Security increased by 7 percent.  Commercial aftermarket sales were up 7 percent at Pratt & Whitney and were up 12 percent at UTC Aerospace Systems. UTC reiterated its 2017 outlook and continues to anticipate: *Note: When we provide expectations for adjusted EPS, organic sales and free cash flow on a forward-looking basis, a reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP expectations and the corresponding GAAP measures generally is not available without unreasonable effort.  See "Use and Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for additional information. United Technologies Corp., based in Farmington, Connecticut, provides high technology products and services to the building and aerospace industries. By combining a passion for science with precision engineering, the company is creating smart, sustainable solutions the world needs. Additional information, including a webcast, is available at www.utc.com or http://edge.media-server.com/m/p/twupxeuw, or to listen to the earnings call by phone, dial (877) 280-7280 between 7:40 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. ET. To learn more about UTC, visit the website or follow the company on Twitter: @UTC Use and Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures United Technologies Corporation reports its financial results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"). We supplement the reporting of our financial information determined under GAAP with certain non-GAAP financial information.  The non-GAAP information presented provides investors with additional useful information, but should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for the related GAAP measures.  Moreover, other companies may define non-GAAP measures differently, which limits the usefulness of these measures for comparisons with such other companies.  We encourage investors to review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure. Adjusted net sales, organic sales, adjusted operating profit, adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share ("EPS") are non-GAAP financial measures.  Adjusted net sales represents consolidated net sales from continuing operations (a GAAP measure), excluding significant items of a non-recurring and/or nonoperational nature (hereinafter referred to as "other significant items").  Organic sales represents consolidated net sales (a GAAP measure), excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, acquisitions and divestitures completed in the preceding twelve months and other significant items.  Adjusted operating profit represents income from continuing operations (a GAAP measure), excluding restructuring costs and other significant items. Adjusted net income represents net income from continuing operations (a GAAP measure), excluding restructuring costs and other significant items. Adjusted diluted EPS represents diluted earnings per share from continuing operations (a GAAP measure), excluding restructuring costs and other significant items.  For the business segments, when applicable, adjustments of net sales, operating profit and margins similarly reflect continuing operations, excluding restructuring and other significant items.  Management believes that the non-GAAP measures just mentioned are useful in providing period-to-period comparisons of the results of the Company's ongoing operational performance. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents cash flow from operations (a GAAP measure) less capital expenditures.  Management believes free cash flow is a useful measure of liquidity and an additional basis for assessing UTC's ability to fund its activities, including the financing of acquisitions, debt service, repurchases of UTC's common stock and distribution of earnings to shareholders. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the corresponding amounts prepared in accordance with GAAP appears in the tables in this Appendix.  The tables provide additional information as to the items and amounts that have been excluded from the adjusted measures. When we provide our expectation for adjusted EPS, organic sales and free cash flow on a forward-looking basis, a reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP expectations and the corresponding GAAP measures (expected diluted EPS from continuing operations, sales and expected cash flow from operations) generally is not available without unreasonable effort due to potentially high variability, complexity and low visibility as to the items that would be excluded from the GAAP measure in the relevant future period, such as unusual gains and losses, the ultimate outcome of pending litigation, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, the impact and timing of potential acquisitions and divestitures, and other structural changes or their probable significance.  The variability of the excluded items may have a significant, and potentially unpredictable, impact on our future GAAP results. Cautionary Statement This press release contains statements which, to the extent they are not statements of historical or present fact, constitute "forward-looking statements" under the securities laws. From time to time, oral or written forward-looking statements may also be included in other information released to the public. These forward-looking statements are intended to provide management's current expectations or plans for our future operating and financial performance, based on assumptions currently believed to be valid. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "believe," "expect," "expectations," "plans," "strategy," "prospects," "estimate," "project," "target," "anticipate," "will," "should," "see," "guidance," "confident" and other words of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. Forward-looking statements may include, among other things, statements relating to future sales, earnings, cash flow, results of operations, uses of cash, share repurchases and other measures of financial performance or potential future plans, strategies or transactions. All forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) future levels of indebtedness and capital spending and research and development spending; (4) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (5) the timing and scope of future repurchases of our common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash; (6) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (7) company and customer- directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (8) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture activity, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into our existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (9) new business opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; and (16) the effect of changes in tax, environmental, regulatory (including among other things import/export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate.    For additional information identifying factors that may cause actual results to vary materially from those stated in forward-looking statements, see our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with or furnished to the SEC from time to time. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we assume no obligation to update or revise such statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. As described on the following pages, consolidated results for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 include restructuring costs and significant non-recurring and non-operational items. See discussion above, "Use and Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures," regarding consideration of such costs and items when evaluating the underlying financial performance. See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. As described on the following pages, consolidated results for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 include restructuring costs and significant non-recurring and non-operational items. See discussion above, "Use and Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures," regarding consideration of such costs and items when evaluating the underlying financial performance. See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation. As previously disclosed in our 2016 Form 10-K, in 2016 we early adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash.  Amounts previously reported for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 have been restated as required upon adoption of these ASUs. These restatements had an immaterial impact to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of March 31, 2016 and for the quarter then ended. Debt to total capitalization equals total debt divided by total debt plus equity.  Net debt to net capitalization equals total debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total debt plus equity less cash and cash equivalents. To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/utc-reports-first-quarter-2017-results-300445827.html


News Article | April 17, 2017
Site: www.spie.org

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) will revolutionize the ways in which we conduct business, perform research, enforce the law, manage natural resources, educate students, and execute many other tasks. While advances in computing technology enhance cloud storage and maximize data exploitation, the UAV imaging sensor remains the key component driving system performance and market growth. This book, Getting Started with UAV Imaging Systems: A Radiometric Guide, is an effort to examine UAV imaging systems in light of their platform and applications contexts. The following excerpt from Chapter 5 focuses on platforms as prelude to examining how mission requirements are met using commercial cameras in different regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. The larger platforms' imaging sensors are well-defined; rather than developing new sensors for each mission, sensor suites for theater and tactical U. S. DoD platforms are specified long in advance. Table 5.2 lists mission and payload types on some larger platforms. Several carry both video and still cameras and include laser instrumentation for covert target illumination.1 While different UAV systems have been designed for different missions and/or altitudes/durations, there is some competition for instruments within the DoD. For example, sensors from the manned U2 reconnaissance platform have been integrated into Global Hawk with the goal of long-term cost savings.3 Small UAV platforms and their imaging sensors serve both military and commercial markets. Increasingly, the term "sUAS" appears to distinguish this type of platform/sensor and associated ground-control hardware from its heavier cousins.4 The Raven, for example, is noteworthy in this category. "SWaP-C," where "C" stands for cost, expresses the importance of minimizing the size, weight, power and cost constraints while meeting mission requirements. Manufacturers advertise their sensors as "low SWaP" or even "smallest SWaP."5 Table 5.3 lists some of the factors that contribute to the design of low SWaP-C systems. The extreme example of "small" is a swarm configuration, whereby numerous small platforms carrying miniature cameras are connected via a communications network.9 More specifically, the term refers to the ability of a collection of small UAVs to achieve a specific objective. The technologies necessary for a successful swarm mission include those in Table 5.3; artificial intelligence (AI) also contributes.10 Miniaturized hardware and enhanced networking capability are key to this strategy's success, which furthers the disruptive effects of UAV imaging. Very small drones that fit in the palm of one's hand are already commercially available.11 The choice of a UAV platform for a smaller sensor is not typically performed according to one, uniform set of criteria. Often, the platform integrator will choose a sensor that best suits a customer's application (one reason it behooves sensor manufacturers to work closely with platform developers.) Contributing factors in platform selection include cost and deployment strategy. For example, situations that involve limited space for maneuvering (such as dense forests) benefit from a rotary aircraft for vertical takeoff and landing.12 Table 5.4 lists some of the factors that influence platform selection. Many other factors are relevant for specific applications, including the ability of the platform to fit a specific carrying case or transport backpack. Integrating UAV sensors to their platforms is an art in its infancy and will develop as the industry matures. 1. Traditionally, military cameras operating in the visible portion of spectrum are called "EO." Therefore, one often sees the term "EO/IR" sensors to refer to visible and infrared cameras, respectively. 2. Catapulted from a rail launcher, see p. 43 in Gertler1. 3. Malenic, Marina, "Northrop Grumman to test U2 Sensors on Global Hawk," Internet Archive (IHS Jane's Defence Weekly), https://web.archive.org/web/20150502152529/http://www.janes.com/article/51076/northrop-grumman-to-test-u-2-sensors-on-global-hawk, Retrieved 4/5/2017. 4. The distinction between sUAS and sUAV may confuse some readers. The first acronym includes the supporting hardware and/or software used for control. 5. Sensors Unlimited-UTC Aerospace Systems, "SWIR Camera for UAVs," Photonics Online, http://www.photonicsonline.com/doc/swir-camera-for-uavs-0001 Retrieved 5/23/15. 6. Sofradir-EC, "Uncooled infrared detectors achieve new performance levels and cost targets," Sofradir-EC White Papers, http://www.sofradir-ec.com/wp-uncooled-detectors-achieve.asp Retrieved 5/23/15. 7. "Lensless Smart Sensor Technology is SWaP-C Friendly," The Rambus Blog, http://www.rambusblog.com/2015/01/26/lensless-smart-sensor-technology-is-swap-c-friendly/ Retrieved 5/23/15. 8. J. Child, "Small UAV payloads wrestle with SWaP Challenges," COTS Journal, October, 2008, http://archive.cotsjournalonline.com/articles/view/100869 Retrieved 5/23/15. 9. See p. 15 in Gertler1. 10. This author's opinion. 11. H. Timmons, "A swarm of incredibly cheap camera drones is buzzing your way," Quartz, 1/14/15, http://qz.com/326264/a-swarm-of-incredibly-cheap-camera-drones-is-buzzing-your-way/ Retrieved 10/6/15. 12. C. VanVeen, Headwall Photonics, communication to author 5/29/15. -Barbara G. Grant, SPIE Senior Member and UC-Irvine Division of Continuing Education Distinguished Instructor, received a MS in Optical Sciences from the University of Arizona in 1989, where she did her graduate research work in the Remote Sensing Group, concentrating on the radiometric calibration of imagers including those on the Landsat Thematic Mapper, SPOT HRV, and the NOAA AVHRR. She worked at Lockheed-Martin and for NASA-Goddard contractors addressing radiometric calibration in the visible, near-infrared, and thermal infrared, and overseeing the integration and test of the GOES-8 and -9 imager and sounder, for which she received two NASA awards. Her previous books for SPIE Press include The Art of Radiometry, which she completed for the late Dr. Jim Palmer, and Field Guide to Radiometry. In 2016, she formed Grant Drone Solutions, LLC, to take the concepts behind the current book into practical application within the emerging UAV marketplace.


News Article | May 6, 2017
Site: news.yahoo.com

Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May and West Midlands Mayor Andy Street (unseen) tour the UTC Aerospace Systems factory during a campaign visit on May 6, 2017 in Wolverhampton. REUTERS/Jack Taylor/Pool LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minster Theresa May's Conservative Party is still a strong 16 points ahead of the main opposition Labour Party ahead of a national election on June 8, according to a poll by Opinium on Saturday. The Conservatives polled 46 percent in an online survey of 2,005 adults, down one point from the last Opinium survey on April 25, while Labour were unchanged on 30 percent. The survey, carried out before this week's big Conservative victory in local elections, put the Liberal democrats on 9 percent and the anti-EU UKIP on 7 percent. Adam Drummond, Head of Political Polling at Opinium, said the strains of the campaign spotlight have had some impact on the public perception of May, with those who voted to remain in the EU in last year's referendum in particular feeling less convinced by her message than at the start of the campaign. But he added: "The Conservatives can afford to lose some Remain voters because, as the local elections showed, they are absorbing most of the UKIP vote and are on course for the type of victory last seen by (Labour's) Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher when they were at their peaks."

Loading UTC Aerospace Systems collaborators
Loading UTC Aerospace Systems collaborators