Boise, ID, United States
Boise, ID, United States

Time filter

Source Type

News Article | May 5, 2017
Site: www.marketwired.com

BOISE, ID--(Marketwired - May 05, 2017) - US Ecology, Inc. ( : ECOL) ("the Company") today announced that management is scheduled to present at several upcoming investor conferences and events in May and June 2017. May Conferences On Monday, May 8, 2017, management will be attending the Waste 360 Expo Summit at the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center in New Orleans, LA. US Ecology's presentation is scheduled for 10:10 a.m. Central Time (11:10 a.m. Eastern Time). On Wednesday, May 10, 2017, management will be presenting at the Wells Fargo Industrial and Construction Conference held at the Lotte New York Palace Hotel in New York City. US Ecology's presentation is scheduled for 10:40 a.m. Eastern Time. On Thursday, May 18, 2017, management will be at the Houlihan Lokey 12th Annual Global Industrials Conference held at the Hilton Midtown New York. June Conferences On Thursday, June 1, 2017, management is scheduled to present at the 2017 KeyBanc Capital Markets Industrial, Automotive & Transportation Conference at the InterContinental Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts. On Thursday, June 15, 2017, management is scheduled to present at the Stifel 2017 Industrials Conference held at the Lotte New York Palace Hotel in New York City. Final schedules and links to available webcasts and presentations will be available on the investor relations section of the company's website at http://investors.usecology.com/events-and-presentations.aspx. About US Ecology, Inc. US Ecology, Inc. is a leading North American provider of environmental services to commercial and government entities. The Company addresses the complex waste management needs of its customers, offering treatment, disposal and recycling of hazardous, non-hazardous and radioactive waste, as well as a wide range of complementary field and industrial services. US Ecology's focus on safety, environmental compliance, and best-in-class customer service enables us to effectively meet the needs of our customers and to build long-lasting relationships. Headquartered in Boise, Idaho, with operations in the United States, Canada and Mexico, the Company has been protecting the environment since 1952. For more information, visit www.usecology.com.


News Article | July 7, 2017
Site: www.marketwired.com

BOISE, ID--(Marketwired - July 03, 2017) - US Ecology, Inc. (the "Company") ( : ECOL) today declared that stockholders of record on July 21, 2017 will receive a quarterly cash dividend of $0.18 per common share, payable on July 28, 2017. The Company currently has 21.7 million shares outstanding and estimates that approximately $3.9 million in cash will be paid out for the declared quarterly dividend. The Company has paid quarterly dividends continuously since 2005. The Company's current annual dividend yield approximates 1.5%. About US Ecology, Inc. US Ecology, Inc. is a leading North American provider of environmental services to commercial and government entities. The Company addresses the complex waste management needs of its customers, offering treatment, disposal and recycling of hazardous, non-hazardous and radioactive waste, as well as a wide range of complementary field and industrial services. US Ecology's focus on safety, environmental compliance, and best-in-class customer service enables us to effectively meet the needs of our customers and to build long-lasting relationships. Headquartered in Boise, Idaho, with operations in the United States, Canada and Mexico, the Company has been protecting the environment since 1952. For more information visit www.usecology.com.


News Article | December 6, 2016
Site: www.prnewswire.co.uk

Revenue Forecasts ($bn) by Waste Type (Low-Level, Intermediate, High-Level), Nuclear Reactor Type (Boiling Water, Gas Cooler, Pressurized Water, Pressurized Heavy Water, Other Nuclear Reactors) and Geography (Canada, Mexico, U.S., France, Russia, U.K, Germany, China, Japan, Argentina, South Africa) The latest report from business intelligence provider visiongain offers fresh analysis of the global nuclear waste management market. Visiongain assesses that this market will generate revenues of $1.90bn in 2017. How this report will benefit you Discover how you can explore the future business opportunities emerging in this sector. Visiongain's new study tells you and tells you now. In this brand new report you find 134 in-depth tables, charts and graphs PLUS an EXCLUSIVE interview - all unavailable elsewhere. The 189 page report provides clear detailed insight into the global nuclear waste management market. Discover the key drivers and challenges affecting the market. By ordering and reading our brand new report today you stay better informed and ready to act. Report Scope The report delivers considerable added value by revealing: • An exclusive interview with key opinion leader Areva SA giving insights into the industry • Evaluation of the nuclear waste management market and how it is evolving • 134 tables, charts and graphs analysing and revealing the growth prospects for the nuclear waste management market • Global nuclear waste management market forecasts and analysis from 2017-2027. • Analysis of what is driving and restraining nuclear waste management market dynamics • Nuclear waste management submarket by waste type forecasts from 2017-2027? The 3 waste type submarkets are provided at global and national level for: - Low-Level, - Intermediate, - High-Level waste To see a report overview please email Sara Peerun on sara.peerun@visiongainglobal.com • 5 nuclear reactor type submarket forecasts from 2017-2027 by technology type are provided at global and national level for: - Boiling Water - Gas Cooler - Pressurized Water - Pressurized Heavy Water - Other Nuclear Reactors. • 11 leading national nuclear waste management forecasts from 2017-2027 segmented by each of the 4 submarkets with drivers and restraints analysed for each national market - Canada, - Mexico - U.S. - France - Russia - U.K - Germany - China - Japan - Argentina - South Africa - Rest of Europe - Rest of Asia Pacific - Others • Profiles of the leading nuclear waste management companies and analysis of their prospects over the forecast period - Areva SA - Augean PLC - Veolia Environmental Services - Waste Control Specialists, LLC - Swedish Nuclear Energy Fuel and Waste Management - BHI Energy - Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. - Bechtel Corporation - US Ecology, Inc. • Consideration of M&A activity will evolve as alliances form during the period between 2017 and 2027? • PESTEL analysis of the major political, economic, social and technological aspects impacting and influencing regional nuclear waste management markets and submarkets • Conclusions and recommendations which will aid decision-making Who should read this report? • Anyone within the nuclear waste management value chain. • Nuclear waste companies • Nuclear decommissioning specialists • Nuclear reactor contractors • Utility companies • District councils, • Business development managers • Marketing managers • Technologists • Suppliers • Investors • Banks • Government agencies • Contractors Visiongain's study is intended for anyone requiring commercial analyses for the nuclear waste management market and leading companies. You find data, trends and predictions. Buy our report today Nuclear Waste Management Market Report 2017-2027: Revenue Forecasts ($bn) by Waste Type (Low-Level, Intermediate, High-Level), Nuclear Reactor Type (Boiling Water, Gas Cooler, Pressurized Water, Pressurized Heavy Water, Other Nuclear Reactors) and Geography (Canada, Mexico, U.S. , France, Russia, U.K, Germany, China, Japan, Argentina, South Africa). Avoid missing out by staying informed - get our report now. To request a report overview of this report please emails Sara Peerun at sara.peerun@visiongainglobal.com or call Tel: +44 (0) 20 7336 6100 To see a report overview please email Sara Peerun on sara.peerun@visiongainglobal.com


News Article | November 11, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Solid Waste Treatment -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database This report studies Solid Waste Treatment in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Solid Waste Treatment in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Solid Waste Treatment in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Solid Waste Treatment Market Research Report 2016 1 Solid Waste Treatment Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Solid Waste Treatment 1.2 Solid Waste Treatment Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Solid Waste Treatment by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Type I 1.2.3 Type II 1.2.4 Type III 1.3 Solid Waste Treatment Segment by Application 1.3.1 Solid Waste Treatment Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Application 1 1.3.3 Application 2 1.3.4 Application 3 1.4 Solid Waste Treatment Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Solid Waste Treatment (2011-2021) 7 Global Solid Waste Treatment Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Arbiogaz 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Type I 7.1.2.2 Type II 7.1.3 Arbiogaz Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 China Everbright International Ltd 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Type I 7.2.2.2 Type II 7.2.3 China Everbright International Ltd Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Progressive Waste Solutions 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Type I 7.3.2.2 Type II 7.3.3 Progressive Waste Solutions Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Remondis 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Type I 7.4.2.2 Type II 7.4.3 Remondis Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Republic Services 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Type I 7.5.2.2 Type II 7.5.3 Republic Services Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Suez Environnement 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Type I 7.6.2.2 Type II 7.6.3 Suez Environnement Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 US Ecology 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Type I 7.7.2.2 Type II 7.7.3 US Ecology Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 Veolia Environmental Services 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Type I 7.8.2.2 Type II 7.8.3 Veolia Environmental Services Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Waste Connections 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Type I 7.9.2.2 Type II 7.9.3 Waste Connections Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 Waste Management 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Solid Waste Treatment Product Type, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Type I 7.10.2.2 Type II 7.10.3 Waste Management Solid Waste Treatment Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview


Brooks J.R.,US Ecology | Mitchell A.K.,Natural Resources Canada
New Phytologist | Year: 2011

Carbon sequestration has focused renewed interest in understanding how forest management affects forest carbon gain over timescales of decades, and yet details of the physiological mechanisms over decades are often lacking for understanding long-term growth responses to management. Here, we examined tree-ring growth patterns and stable isotopes of cellulose (δ 13C cell and δ 18O cell) in a thinning and fertilization controlled experiment where growth increased substantially in response to treatments to elucidate physiological data and to test the dual isotope approach for uses in other locations. δ 13C cell and δ 18O cell results indicated that fertilization caused an increase in intrinsic water-use efficiency through increases in photosynthesis (A) for the first 3yr. The combination treatment caused a much larger increase in A and water-use efficiency. Only the thinning treatments showed consistent significant increases in δ 18O cell above controls. Changes in canopy microclimate are the likely drivers for δ 18O cell increases with decreases in relative humidity and increases in leaf temperature associated with thinning being the most probable causes. Tree-ring isotopic records, particularly δ 13C cell, remain a viable way to reconstruct long-term physiological mechanisms affecting tree carbon gain in response to management and climate fluctuations. No claim to original US government works. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust.


Hoffman J.C.,US Ecology | Sutton T.T.,Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers | Year: 2010

Stable isotope analysis of fish tissue can aid studies of deep-sea food webs because sampling difficulties severely limit sample sizes of fish for traditional diet studies. The carbon stable isotope ratio (δ13C) is widely used in food web studies, but it must be corrected to remove variability associated with varying lipid content in the tissue. A lipid correction has not been determined for any deep-sea fish. These fishes are ideal for studying lipid correction because lipid content varies widely among species. Our objective was to evaluate an application of a mass balance δ13C correction to a taxonomically diverse group of deep-sea fishes by determining the effect of lipid extraction on the stable isotope ratios, examining the quality of the model parameters derived for the mass balance correction, and comparing the correction to published results. We measured the lipid extraction effect on the nitrogen stable isotope ratio (δ15N) and δ13C of muscle tissue from 30 North Atlantic species. Lipid extraction significantly increased tissue δ15N (+0.66%o) and δ13C values, but the treatment effect on δ13C was dependent on C:N, a proxy for lipid content. We compared the lipid-extracted δ13C to the δ13C predicted by the mass balance correction using model variables estimated from either all individuals (pooled) or species-by-species or using published values from other species. The correction using the species-by-species approach performed best; however, all three approaches produced corrected values that were generally within 0.5%o of the measured lipid-free δ13C and that had a small over-all bias (<0.5%o). We conclude that a generalized mass balance correction works well for correcting δ13C in deep-sea fishes, is similar to that developed for other fishes, and recommend caution when applying a generalized correction to fish with high lipid content (C:N >8). © 2010.


News Article | February 16, 2017
Site: www.marketwired.com

2016 Net Income of $34.3 Million; 2016 Adjusted EBITDA of $112.8 Million; 2017 Adjusted EBITDA forecast of $120-$130 Million BOISE, ID--(Marketwired - February 16, 2017) - US Ecology, Inc. ( : ECOL) ("the Company") today reported total revenue of $117.2 million and net income of $7.7 million, or $0.35 per diluted share for the quarter-ended December 31, 2016. "We saw another quarter of sluggishness in the industrial sector, including lower spending and continued project deferment, which resulted in Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA for 2016 at the low end of our guidance range," commented Jeff Feeler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "Winter weather conditions, which affected shipping and production schedules, combined with lower December industrial waste volumes contributed to a 4% decline in Base Business in our Environmental Services segment in the fourth quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 2015. Our Environmental Services segment Event Business was down 17% during the quarter as compared to the same quarter last year due to prior year project completions that were not fully replaced and continued project delays. Our Field and Industrial Services segment also delivered lower than anticipated results on the softer market conditions as we closed out the year. The recent uptick in the industrial sector seen so far in the first quarter, however, while not yet resulting in improved volumes, bodes well for our 2017 business outlook given the tendency of the hazardous waste industry to lag industrial cycles." Total revenue for the fourth quarter of 2016 of $117.2 million was down from $138.3 million in the same quarter last year. Revenue for the fourth quarter of 2015 included $8.1 million of revenue for Allstate Power Vac ("Allstate"), which was divested on November 1, 2015. Revenue for the Environmental Services ("ES") segment was $85.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2016, down from $92.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2015. This decline consisted of a 4% decrease in treatment and disposal ("T&D") revenue and a 24% decrease in transportation revenue compared to the fourth quarter of 2015. Revenue for the Field and Industrial Services ("FIS") segment was $31.5 million for the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to $45.5 million in the same period of 2015. After taking into account the divested Allstate business, which contributed $8.1 million of revenue in the fourth quarter of 2015, our remaining FIS revenue was down 16% from the same quarter in the prior year reflecting the expiration of a contract that was not renewed and softer overall market conditions. Gross profit for the fourth quarter of 2016 was $36.1 million, down from $44.2 million in the same quarter last year. Gross profit for the ES segment was $32.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2016, down from $36.3 million in the same quarter of 2015. T&D gross margin for the ES segment was 41% for the fourth quarter of 2016, compared to 44% for the fourth quarter of 2015. Gross profit for the FIS segment in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $4.0 million. This compares to gross profit of $7.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2015, which included $1.6 million from the divested Allstate business, representing therefore a year-over-year decline of 36% in the remaining FIS business. The decline was due to the reduced revenue as well as year-end accrual and reserve adjustments in the fourth quarter of 2016. Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expense for the fourth quarter of 2016 was $19.9 million compared with $22.0 million in the same quarter last year, which included $1.0 million related to the divested Allstate business. Excluding the decline related to the Allstate divestiture, SG&A expense decreased due to lower incentive compensation costs, lower consulting and professional services and lower bad debt expense in the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to the fourth quarter of 2015. Operating income for the fourth quarter of 2016 was $16.2 million compared to $22.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2015. Allstate had operating income of $538,000 in the fourth quarter of 2015. Net interest expense for the fourth quarter of 2016 was $4.2 million, down from $7.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2015. The decrease was due to lower debt levels and a $2.4 million charge for deferred financing costs recorded in the fourth quarter last year. The Company's consolidated effective income tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2016 was 35.5%, down from 45.5% for the fourth quarter of 2015. The decrease was due to a decline in our U.S. effective tax rate, primarily driven by a non-recurring capital loss in the fourth quarter of 2015 as a result of the sale of Allstate, as well as changes in our apportionments between the various states in which we operate. Also contributing to the decrease in our effective tax rate is a higher proportion of earnings from our Canadian operations in the fourth quarter of 2016, which are taxed at a lower corporate tax rate. Net income for the fourth quarter of 2016 was $7.7 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, consistent with the fourth quarter of 2015. Adjusted earnings per share, which excludes loss on sale of divested businesses, the divested Allstate business, foreign currency translation gains and losses and business development expenses, was $0.36 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of both 2016 and 2015. Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2016 was $27.3 million, down 17% from $33.0 million in the same period last year. Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the divested Allstate business and business development expenses, was $27.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to $32.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2015. Reconciliations of earnings per diluted share to adjusted earnings per diluted share and net income to adjusted EBITDA and Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA are attached as Exhibit A to this release. Total revenue for 2016 was $477.7 million compared to $563.1 million in 2015. 2015 included $59.1 million of revenue for the divested Allstate business. ES segment revenue was $337.8 million for 2016, down from $359.0 million in 2015 on a 30% decline in Event Business, partially offset by a 2% increase in Base Business. This decline consisted of a 5% decrease in T&D revenue and a 9% reduction in transportation revenue compared to 2015. Revenue for the FIS segment was $139.9 million in 2016 compared to $204.0 million in 2015. After taking into account the divested Allstate business, FIS revenue was down approximately 3% in 2016 compared to 2015. Gross profit for 2016 was $147.6 million, down from $171.4 million in the same period last year. Gross profit for the ES segment was $126.8 million in 2016, down from $137.6 million in 2015. T&D gross margin for the ES segment was 42% for 2016 compared to 43% for 2015. Gross profit for the FIS segment in 2016 was $20.8 million. This compares to $33.8 million in 2015, which included $12.4 million from the divested Allstate business, and reflects a year-over-year gross profit decline of approximately 3% in the remaining FIS business. SG&A expense for 2016 was $77.6 million compared with $93.1 million in the same period last year, which included $10.9 million related to the divested Allstate business. Excluding the decline related to the Allstate divestiture, SG&A expense decreased due to lower business development costs, incentive compensation and consulting and professional services in 2016 compared to 2015. 2016 operating income was $70.0 million, down 2% from $71.6 million in 2015. Allstate had an operating loss of $4.9 million in 2015. Net interest expense for 2016 was $17.2 million, down from $23.3 million in 2015. The decrease was due to lower debt levels in 2016 compared with 2015 and a reduction in non-cash amortization of deferred financing fees. The Company's consolidated effective income tax rate for 2016 was 38.1%, down from 39.3% when excluding the non-deductible goodwill impairment charge in 2015. This decrease primarily reflects a lower U.S. effective tax rate for 2016 driven by changes in our apportionment between the various states in which we operate. Net income was $34.3 million, or $1.57 per diluted share, in 2016 compared to $25.6 million, or $1.18 per diluted share, in 2015. Adjusted earnings per share, which excludes the gain/loss on sale of divested businesses, goodwill impairment charges, the divested Allstate business, foreign currency translation gains and losses and business development expenses, was $1.53 for 2016 compared to $1.57 per diluted share for 2015. Adjusted EBITDA was $112.8 million in 2016, down 10% from $125.5 million in 2015. Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the divested Allstate business and business development expenses, was $113.4 million in 2016 compared to $122.6 million in 2015. Reconciliations of earnings per diluted share to adjusted earnings per diluted share and net income to adjusted EBITDA and Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA are attached as Exhibit A to this release. "The positive trends emerging in the industrial economy and the improving outlook for many of our customers, gives us increasing confidence that US Ecology will return to growth in 2017," commented Feeler. "Supporting this optimism is the growing pipeline of Event Business opportunities that will supplement those projects deferred in 2016 that are now slated for 2017. Despite this improving outlook, we remain cautious at the rate of growth we can expect in 2017. Growth in our Environmental Services segment Base Business is projected to improve from 2016 levels, growing between 3-5% in 2017. We also expect that our Environmental Services segment Event Business will return to growth in 2017 as we receive volume from multi-year projects currently under contract, the growing pipeline of new opportunities and the commencement of projects deferred from last year. Our Field and Industrial Services segment is expected to be up slightly in 2017 despite cycling some larger completed contracts and a field services contract that was not renewed in the fourth quarter of 2016." Based on current business conditions, management is projecting 2017 earnings per diluted share between $1.69 and $1.93 and adjusted EBITDA of $120 to $130 million. This guidance reflects adjusted EBITDA growth of up to 15%, compared to 2016 Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA of $113.4 million and growth of up to 26% from adjusted earnings per share of $1.53 in 2016. 2017 revenue is anticipated to range from $495 million to $533 million, compared to $478 million in 2016. Breaking down our revenue guidance by segment, we expect our 2017 ES segment revenue to range between $357 and $389 million and our FIS segment revenue to range between $138 and $144 million. The following table reconciles our adjusted EBITDA guidance range to our projected net income. Projections exclude any foreign currency translation gains or losses, business development expenses or other unusual transactions. 2017 capital spending is estimated to range from $34 to $37 million, including 2016 carryover amounts. This is in line with the $35.7 million spent in 2016. Capital expenditures for 2017 will focus on constructing additional disposal space, ongoing infrastructure improvements and equipment replacement at our operating facilities and information system upgrades. On January 3, 2017, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share for stockholders of record on January 20, 2017. The $3.9 million dividend was paid on January 27, 2017. US Ecology, Inc. will hold an investor conference call on Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Daylight Time (8:00 a.m. Mountain Standard Daylight Time) to discuss these results and its current financial position and business outlook. Questions will be invited after management's presentation. Interested parties can access the conference call by dialing 877-512-4138 or 412-317-5478. The conference call will also be broadcast live on our website at www.usecology.com. An audio replay will be available through February 24, 2017 by calling 877-344-7529 or 412-317-0088 and using the passcode 10100324. The replay will also be accessible on our website at www.usecology.com. About US Ecology, Inc. US Ecology, Inc. is a leading North American provider of environmental services to commercial and government entities. The Company addresses the complex waste management needs of its customers, offering treatment, disposal and recycling of hazardous, non-hazardous and radioactive waste, as well as a wide range of complementary field and industrial services. US Ecology's focus on safety, environmental compliance, and best-in-class customer service enables us to effectively meet the needs of our customers and to build long-lasting relationships. Headquartered in Boise, Idaho, with operations in the United States, Canada and Mexico, the Company has been protecting the environment since 1952. For more information, visit www.usecology.com. Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of performance. These statements are based on management's beliefs and assumptions, which in turn are based on currently available information. Important assumptions include, among others, those regarding demand for Company services, expansion of service offerings geographically or through new or expanded service lines, the timing and cost of planned capital expenditures, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. These assumptions could prove inaccurate. Forward-looking statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Such factors include the replacement of non-recurring event clean-up projects, a loss of a major customer, our ability to permit and contract for timely construction of new or expanded disposal cells, our ability to renew our operating permits or lease agreements with regulatory bodies, loss of key personnel, compliance with and changes to applicable laws, rules, or regulations, access to insurance, surety bonds and other financial assurances, a deterioration in our labor relations or labor disputes, our ability to perform under required contracts, failure to realize anticipated benefits and operational performance from acquired operations, adverse economic or market conditions, government funding or competitive pressures, incidents or adverse weather conditions that could limit or suspend specific operations, access to cost effective transportation services, fluctuations in foreign currency markets, lawsuits, our willingness or ability to repurchase shares or pay dividends, implementation of new technologies, limitations on our available cash flow as a result of our indebtedness and our ability to effectively execute our acquisition strategy and integrate future acquisitions. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), we are under no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results or performance. Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in the "Risk Factors" sections of our annual and quarterly reports could harm our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition. US Ecology reports adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share results, which are non-GAAP financial measures, as a complement to results provided in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) and believes that such information provides analysts, stockholders, and other users information to better understand the Company's operating performance. Because adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share are not measurements determined in accordance with GAAP and are thus susceptible to varying calculations they may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Items excluded from adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to, or substitute for, net income, cash flows generated by operations, investing or financing activities, or other financial statement data presented in the consolidated financial statements as indicators of financial performance or liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or a substitute for analyzing our results as reported under GAAP. Some of the limitations are: The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as net income before interest expense, interest income, income tax expense, depreciation, amortization, stock based compensation, accretion of closure and post-closure liabilities, foreign currency gain/loss, non-cash impairment charges and other income/expense, which are not considered part of usual business operations. The Company defines Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA as adjusted EBITDA (see definition above) less the adjusted EBITDA related to the divested Allstate business, plus business development expenses incurred during the period. We believe Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA is helpful in understanding our business and how it relates to our 2017 guidance which includes neither the divested Allstate business nor business development expenses. The following reconciliation itemizes the differences between reported net income and adjusted EBITDA and Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA for the three months and year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: The Company defines adjusted earnings per diluted share as net income adjusted for the after-tax impact of the gains and losses on sale of divested businesses, non-cash foreign currency translation gains or losses, the after-tax impact of business development costs, the after-tax impact of the divested Allstate business, and non-cash impairment charges, divided by the number of diluted shares used in the earnings per share calculation. Impairment charges excluded from the earnings per diluted share calculation are related to the Company's decision to explore strategic alternatives for our industrial services business. The foreign currency translation gains or losses excluded from the earnings per diluted share calculation are related to intercompany loans between our Canadian subsidiaries and the U.S. parent which have been established as part of our tax and treasury management strategy. These intercompany loans are payable in Canadian dollars ("CAD") requiring us to revalue the outstanding loan balance through our consolidated income statement based on the CAD/United States currency movements from period to period. Business development costs relate to expenses incurred to evaluate businesses for potential acquisition or costs related to closing and integrating successfully acquired businesses. We believe excluding gains and losses on sale of divested businesses, non-cash foreign currency translation gains or losses, the after-tax impact of business development costs, the after-tax impact of the divested Allstate business, and non-cash impairment charges provides meaningful information to investors regarding the operational and financial performance of the Company. The following reconciliation itemizes the differences between reported net income and earnings per diluted share to adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share for the three months and year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:


News Article | October 28, 2016
Site: www.marketwired.com

Lowers 2016 Outlook on Project Deferrals and Continued Softness in Event Business US Ecology, Inc. ( : ECOL) ("the Company") today reported total revenue of $124.8 million and net income of $10.1 million, or $0.46 per diluted share for the quarter-ended September 30, 2016. "Continued sluggishness in the macro industrial environment resulted in our third quarter not materializing as expected," commented Jeff Feeler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "Recurring Base Business delivered solid 4% growth for our Environmental Services segment during the quarter and was in-line with expectations. However, we continued to experience challenging market dynamics in our Event Business resulting from a combination of project delays and fewer remedial cleanup opportunities. Our Field and Industrial Services business unit saw solid growth on a year-over-year basis but also delivered lower than anticipated results on softer business activity levels." Total revenue for the third quarter of 2016 of $124.8 million was down from $148.4 million in the same quarter last year. Revenue for the third quarter of 2015 included $20.1 million of revenue for Allstate Power Vac ("Allstate"), which was divested on November 1, 2015. Revenue for the Environmental Services ("ES")1 segment was $87.8 million for the third quarter of 2016, down from $91.9 million in the third quarter of 2015. This decline consisted of a 4% decrease in treatment and disposal ("T&D") revenue and a 9% decrease in transportation revenue compared to the third quarter of 2015. Revenue for the Field and Industrial Services ("FIS")2 segment was $37.0 million for the third quarter of 2016 compared to $56.5 million in the same period of 2015. After taking into account the divested Allstate business, which contributed $20.1 million of revenue in the third quarter of 2015, our remaining FIS revenue was relatively consistent with the same quarter in the prior year. Gross profit for the third quarter of 2016 was $39.4 million, down from $45.9 million in the same quarter last year. Gross profit for the ES segment was $33.6 million in the third quarter of 2016, down from $35.6 million in the same quarter of 2015. T&D gross margin for the ES segment was 43% for the third quarter of 2016, compared to 44% for the third quarter of 2015. Gross profit for the FIS segment in the third quarter of 2016 was $5.7 million. This compares to $10.4 million in the third quarter of 2015, which included $4.9 million from the divested Allstate business, representing therefore a year-over-year improvement of over 4% in the remaining FIS business. Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expense for the third quarter of 2016 was $18.4 million compared with $23.5 million in the same quarter last year, which included $3.2 million related to the divested Allstate business. Excluding the SG&A related to the Allstate divestiture, SG&A decreased primarily due to lower labor and incentive compensation costs as well as insurance recoveries in the third quarter of 2016 compared to the third quarter of 2015. Operating income for the third quarter of 2016 was $20.9 million compared to $22.4 million in the third quarter of 2015. Allstate had operating income of $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2015. Excluding Allstate, operating income improved marginally over the third quarter of 2015. Net interest expense for the third quarter of 2016 was $4.3 million, down from $5.1 million in the third quarter of 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower debt levels in the third quarter of 2016 compared with the same period of 2015. The Company's consolidated effective income tax rate for the third quarter of 2016 was 38.3%, down from 40.9% for the third quarter of 2015. This decrease primarily reflects a higher proportion of earnings from our Canadian operations which are taxed at a lower corporate tax rate. The decrease was partially offset by a higher U.S. effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2016, driven by a higher overall effective state tax rate resulting from changes in our apportionment between the various states in which we operate. Net income for the third quarter of 2016 of $10.1 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, compared to $9.9 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2015. Adjusted earnings per share, which excludes loss on sale of divested businesses, the divested Allstate business, foreign currency translation gains and losses and business development expenses, was $0.47 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2016 compared to $0.45 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2015. Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2016 was $31.7 million, down 6% from $33.8 million in the same period last year. Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the divested Allstate business and business development expenses, was $31.7 million in the third quarter of 2016 compared to $31.6 million in the third quarter of 2015. Reconciliations of earnings per diluted share to adjusted earnings per diluted share and net income to adjusted EBITDA and Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA are attached as Exhibit A to this release. Total revenue for the first nine months of 2016 was $360.5 million compared to $424.8 million in the first nine months of 2015. Revenue for the first nine months of 2015 included $51.0 million of revenue for Allstate. Revenue for the ES segment was $252.1 million for the first nine months of 2016, down from $266.3 million in the same period of 2015. This decline consisted of a 6% decrease in T&D revenue and a 4% reduction in transportation revenue compared to the first nine months of 2015. Revenue for the FIS segment was $108.4 million for the first nine months of 2016 compared to $158.5 million in the same period of 2015. After taking into account the divested Allstate business, FIS revenue was relatively consistent over the prior year period. Gross profit for the first nine months of 2016 was $111.5 million, down from $127.3 million in the same period last year. Gross profit for the ES segment was $94.7 million in the first nine months of 2016, down from $101.3 million in the first nine months of 2015. T&D gross margin for the ES segment was 42% for the first nine months of 2016 compared to 43% for the first nine months of 2015. Gross profit for the FIS segment in the first nine months of 2016 was $16.8 million. This compares to $25.9 million in the first nine months of 2015, which included $10.8 million from the divested Allstate business, representing therefore a year-over-year improvement of approximately 11% in gross profit in the remaining FIS business. SG&A expense for the first nine months of 2016 was $57.7 million compared with $71.1 million in the same period last year, which included $9.9 million related to the divested Allstate business. Excluding the decline related to the Allstate divestiture, SG&A expense decreased primarily due to lower business development costs, incentive compensation and consulting and professional services in the first nine months of 2016 compared to the first nine months of 2015. Operating income for the first nine months of 2016 was $53.8 million, up 9% from $49.5 million in the first nine months of 2015. Allstate had an operating loss of $5.5 million in the first nine months of 2015 which included a $6.4 million goodwill impairment charge. Net interest expense for the first nine months of 2016 was $13.0 million, down from $16.1 million in the first nine months of 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower debt levels in the first nine months of 2016 compared with the same period in 2015. The Company's consolidated effective income tax rate for the first nine months of 2016 was 38.8%, up from 37.6% when excluding the non-deductible goodwill impairment charge for the first nine months of 2015. This increase primarily reflects a lower proportion of earnings from our Canadian operations which are taxed at a lower corporate tax rate. The increase is also partially attributable to a higher U.S. effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2016 driven by a higher overall effective state tax rate resulting from changes in our apportionment between the various states in which we operate. Net income for the first nine months of 2016 was $26.6 million, or $1.22 per diluted share, compared to $17.9 million, or $0.82 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2015. Adjusted earnings per share, which excludes the gain on sale of divested businesses, goodwill impairment charges, the divested Allstate business, foreign currency translation gains and losses and business development expenses, was $1.16 in the first nine months of 2016 compared to $1.21 per diluted share for the first nine months of 2015. Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months of 2016 was $85.5 million, down 7% from $92.4 million in the same period last year. Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the divested Allstate business and business development expenses, was $86.0 million in the first nine months of 2016 compared to $90.0 million in the first nine months of 2015. Reconciliations of earnings per diluted share to adjusted earnings per diluted share and net income to adjusted EBITDA and Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA are attached as Exhibit A to this release. "The market environment for the first nine months has remained challenging, and we don't expect to see any improvement over the balance of the year," commented Feeler. "Despite generating single digit growth in our Base Business, project deferrals continue to push volume to future periods. Additionally, as we exit the summer construction season, it is unlikely we will see improvement in our Event Business, with customers more likely to wait until 2017 to start new projects. Our Field and Industrial services business is expected to slow in the fourth quarter as a result of lower industrial spending and the expiration of a contract that was not renewed. It is this combination of factors that has us lowering our expectations for our 2016 financial results. We now expect diluted earnings per share to range between $1.54 to $1.65 per share and Adjusted EBITDA to range from $113 to $118 million for 2016. This is down from our previously issued guidance of $1.80 to $1.95 per diluted share and Adjusted EBITDA between $126 million to $132 million." Our 2016 outlook does not take into account business development costs, results of divested businesses or foreign currency translation gains or losses. Feeler concluded, "While there may continue to be short-term headwinds in the industrial sector, we continue to be strategically focused on growing our base business and adding strategic, high quality assets that expand or complement our disposal network allowing us to diversify our business while lessening our dependence on a single remedial project. We have strengthened our balance sheet and paid down debt with our strong cash flows, while our Board authorized a $25 million share repurchase program in order to further enhance our value creation strategy. We remain confident in our ability to deliver value to our stockholders over the long term." The following table reconciles our adjusted EBITDA guidance range to our projected net income. On October 3, 2016, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share for stockholders of record on October 21, 2016. The $3.9 million dividend will be paid on October 28, 2016. US Ecology, Inc. will hold an investor conference call on Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (8:00 a.m. Mountain Daylight Time) to discuss these results and its current financial position and business outlook. Questions will be invited after management's presentation. Interested parties can access the conference call by dialing 877-512-4138 or 412-317-5478. The conference call will also be broadcast live on our website at www.usecology.com. An audio replay will be available through November 4, 2016 by calling 877-344-7529 or 412-317-0088 and by using the passcode 10094182. The replay will also be accessible on our website at www.usecology.com. About US Ecology, Inc. US Ecology, Inc. is a leading North American provider of environmental services to commercial and government entities. The Company addresses the complex waste management needs of its customers, offering treatment, disposal and recycling of hazardous, non-hazardous and radioactive waste, as well as a wide range of complementary field and industrial services. US Ecology's focus on safety, environmental compliance, and best-in-class customer service enables us to effectively meet the needs of our customers and to build long-lasting relationships. Headquartered in Boise, Idaho, with operations in the United States, Canada and Mexico, the Company has been protecting the environment since 1952. For more information, visit www.usecology.com. Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of performance. These statements are based on management's beliefs and assumptions, which in turn are based on currently available information. Important assumptions include, among others, those regarding demand for Company services, expansion of service offerings geographically or through new or expanded service lines, the timing and cost of planned capital expenditures, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. These assumptions could prove inaccurate. Forward-looking statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Such factors include the replacement of non-recurring event clean-up projects, a loss of a major customer, our ability to permit and contract for timely construction of new or expanded disposal cells, our ability to renew our operating permits or lease agreements with regulatory bodies, loss of key personnel, compliance with and changes to applicable laws, rules, or regulations, access to insurance, surety bonds and other financial assurances, a deterioration in our labor relations or labor disputes, our ability to perform under required contracts, failure to realize anticipated benefits and operational performance from acquired operations, adverse economic or market conditions, government funding or competitive pressures, incidents or adverse weather conditions that could limit or suspend specific operations, access to cost effective transportation services, fluctuations in foreign currency markets, lawsuits, our willingness or ability to repurchase shares or pay dividends, implementation of new technologies, limitations on our available cash flow as a result of our indebtedness and our ability to effectively execute our acquisition strategy and integrate future acquisitions. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), we are under no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results or performance. Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in the "Risk Factors" sections of our annual and quarterly reports could harm our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition. 1 Environmental Services ("ES") - This segment provides diversified waste services including transportation, recycling, treatment and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous materials at Company-owned landfill, wastewater and other treatment facilities. 2 Field & Industrial Services ("FIS") - This segment provides waste packaging, collection and total waste management solutions at customer sites and through our 10-day transfer facilities. Services include on-site management, waste characterization, transportation and disposal of non-hazardous and hazardous waste. This segment also provides specialty services such as high-pressure cleaning, tank cleaning, decontamination, remediation, spill cleanup, emergency response and other services to commercial and industrial facilities and government entities. US Ecology reports adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share results, which are non-GAAP financial measures, as a complement to results provided in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) and believes that such information provides analysts, stockholders, and other users information to better understand the Company's operating performance. Because adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share are not measurements determined in accordance with GAAP and are thus susceptible to varying calculations they may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Items excluded from adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to, or substitute for, net income, cash flows generated by operations, investing or financing activities, or other financial statement data presented in the consolidated financial statements as indicators of financial performance or liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA, Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per diluted share have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or a substitute for analyzing our results as reported under GAAP. Some of the limitations are: The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as net income before interest expense, interest income, income tax expense, depreciation, amortization, stock based compensation, accretion of closure and post-closure liabilities, foreign currency gain/loss, non-cash impairment charges and other income/expense, which are not considered part of usual business operations. The Company defines Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA as adjusted EBITDA (see definition above) less the adjusted EBITDA related to the divested Allstate business, plus business development expenses incurred during the period. We believe Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA is helpful in understanding our business and how it relates to our 2016 guidance which includes neither the divested Allstate business nor business development expenses. The following reconciliation itemizes the differences between reported net income and adjusted EBITDA and Pro Forma adjusted EBITDA for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015: The Company defines adjusted earnings per diluted share as net income adjusted for the after-tax impact of the gain on sale of divested businesses, non-cash foreign currency translation gains or losses, the after-tax impact of business development costs, and the after-tax impact of the divested Allstate business, divided by the number of diluted shares used in the earnings per share calculation. Impairment charges excluded from the earnings per diluted share calculation are related to the Company's decision to explore strategic alternatives for our industrial services business. The foreign currency translation gains or losses excluded from the earnings per diluted share calculation are related to intercompany loans between our Canadian subsidiaries and the U.S. parent which have been established as part of our tax and treasury management strategy. These intercompany loans are payable in Canadian dollars ("CAD") requiring us to revalue the outstanding loan balance through our consolidated income statement based on the CAD/United States currency movements from period to period. Business development costs relate to expenses incurred to evaluate businesses for potential acquisition or costs related to closing and integrating successfully acquired businesses. We believe excluding these non-cash foreign currency movements for intercompany financial instruments and business development costs provides meaningful information to investors regarding the operational and financial performance of the Company. The following reconciliation itemizes the differences between reported net income and earnings per diluted share to adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015: (1) Impairment charges were not deductible for income tax purposes


— This report studies the global Emergency Spill Response market, analyzes and researches the Emergency Spill Response development status and forecast in United States, EU, Japan, China, India and Southeast Asia. This report focuses on the top players in global market, like Oil Spill Response Marine Well Containment Polyeco Vikoma International Desmi A/S Veolia Environnement Clean Harbors US Ecology Adler and Allan Markleen A/S Elastec For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com Market segment by Type, Emergency Spill Response can be split into Oil Chemical and Hazardous Materials Market segment by Application, Emergency Spill Response can be split into Transportation Chemical Government Industrial Facilities Other Global Emergency Spill Response Market Size, Status and Forecast 2022 1 Industry Overview of Emergency Spill Response 1.1 Emergency Spill Response Market Overview 1.1.1 Emergency Spill Response Product Scope 1.1.2 Market Status and Outlook 1.2 Global Emergency Spill Response Market Size and Analysis by Regions 1.2.1 United States 1.2.2 EU 1.2.3 Japan 1.2.4 China 1.2.5 India 1.2.6 Southeast Asia 1.3 Emergency Spill Response Market by Type 1.3.1 Oil 1.3.2 Chemical and Hazardous Materials 1.4 Emergency Spill Response Market by End Users/Application 1.4.1 Transportation 1.4.2 Chemical 1.4.3 Government 1.4.4 Industrial Facilities 1.4.5 Other 2 Global Emergency Spill Response Competition Analysis by Players 2.1 Emergency Spill Response Market Size (Value) by Players (2015-2016) 2.2 Competitive Status and Trend 2.2.1 Market Concentration Rate 2.2.2 Product/Service Differences 2.2.3 New Entrants 2.2.4 The Technology Trends in Future 3 Company (Top Players) Profiles 3.1 Oil Spill Response 3.1.1 Company Profile 3.1.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.1.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.1.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.1.5 Recent Developments 3.2 Marine Well Containment 3.2.1 Company Profile 3.2.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.2.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.2.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.2.5 Recent Developments 3.3 Polyeco 3.3.1 Company Profile 3.3.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.3.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.3.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.3.5 Recent Developments 3.4 Vikoma International 3.4.1 Company Profile 3.4.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.4.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.4.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.4.5 Recent Developments 3.5 Desmi A/S 3.5.1 Company Profile 3.5.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.5.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.5.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.5.5 Recent Developments 3.6 Veolia Environnement 3.6.1 Company Profile 3.6.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.6.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.6.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.6.5 Recent Developments 3.7 Clean Harbors 3.7.1 Company Profile 3.7.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.7.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.7.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.7.5 Recent Developments 3.8 US Ecology 3.8.1 Company Profile 3.8.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.8.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.8.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.8.5 Recent Developments 3.9 Adler and Allan 3.9.1 Company Profile 3.9.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.9.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.9.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.9.5 Recent Developments 3.10 Markleen A/S 3.10.1 Company Profile 3.10.2 Main Business/Business Overview 3.10.3 Products, Services and Solutions 3.10.4 Emergency Spill Response Revenue (Value) (2012-2017) 3.10.5 Recent Developments 3.11 Elastec For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com ABOUT US: Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports features an exhaustive list of market research reports from hundreds of publishers worldwide. We boast a database spanning virtually every market category and an even more comprehensive collection of rmaket research reports under these categories and sub-categories. For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com


BOISE, ID--(Marketwired - February 09, 2017) - US Ecology, Inc. (the "Company") ( : ECOL) today announced that it will release financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 on Thursday, February 16, 2017, after the close of the market. Management will conduct an investor conference call on Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time (8:00 a.m. Mountain Time) to discuss these results. Questions will be invited after management's presentation. Interested parties can access the conference call by dialing 877-512-4138 or 412-317-5478. The conference call will also be broadcast live on the Company's website at www.usecology.com. An audio replay of the teleconference will be made available through February 24, 2017 by calling 877-344-7529 or 412-317-0088 and using the passcode 10100324. The replay will also be accessible on the Company's website at www.usecology.com. About US Ecology, Inc. US Ecology, Inc. is a leading North American provider of environmental services to commercial and government entities. The Company addresses the complex waste management needs of its customers, offering treatment, disposal and recycling of hazardous, non-hazardous and radioactive waste, as well as a wide range of complementary field and industrial services. US Ecology's focus on safety, environmental compliance, and best-in-class customer service enables us to effectively meet the needs of our customers and to build long-lasting relationships. Headquartered in Boise, Idaho, with operations in the United States, Canada and Mexico, the Company has been protecting the environment since 1952. For more information visit www.usecology.com.

Loading US Ecology collaborators
Loading US Ecology collaborators