Albuquerque, NM, United States
Albuquerque, NM, United States

The University of New Mexico is a public research university located in Albuquerque, New Mexico, in the United States. It is the state's flagship research institution, the largest post-secondary institution in the state in total enrollment across all campuses, as of 2012, and one of the state's largest employers.Founded in 1889, UNM offers bachelor's, master's, doctoral, and professional degree programs in a wide variety of fields. Its Albuquerque campus currently encompasses over 600 acres , and there are branch campuses in Gallup, Los Alamos, Rio Rancho, Taos, and Los Lunas. UNM is categorized as an RU/VH Research University in the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, with three Nobel laureates affiliated or associated. Wikipedia.


Time filter

Source Type

PubMed | University of Washington and University of New Mexico
Type: Review | Journal: The Annals of pharmacotherapy | Year: 2016

To systematically review and assess the quality of the novel drugs economic evaluation literature in print during the drugs early commercial availability following US regulatory approval.MEDLINE and the United Kingdom National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched from 1946 through December 2011 for economic evaluations of the 50 novel drugs approved by the FDA in 2008 and 2009.The inclusion criteria were English-language, peer-reviewed, original economic evaluations (cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, cost-minimization, and cost-benefit analyses). We extracted and analyzed data from 36 articles considering 19 of the 50 drugs. Two reviewers assessed each publications quality using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument and summarized study quality on a 100-point scale.Study quality had a mean of 70.0 16.2 QHES points. The only study characteristics associated with QHES score (with P < 0.05) were having used modeling or advanced statistics, 75.1 versus 61.9 without; using quality-adjusted life years as an outcome, 75.9 versus 64.7 without; and cost-utility versus cost-minimization analysis, 75.9 versus 58.7. Studies most often satisfied quality aspects about stating study design choices and least often satisfied aspects about justifying design choices.The reviewed literature considered a minority of the 2008-2009 novel drugs and had mixed study quality. Cost-effectiveness stakeholders might benefit from efforts to improve the quality and quantity of literature examining novel drugs. Editors and reviewers may support quality improvement by stringently imposing economic evaluation guidelines about justifying study design choices.

Loading University of New Mexico collaborators
Loading University of New Mexico collaborators