Spieth P.M.,University Hospital Dresden |
Zhang H.,University of Toronto
Current Opinion in Critical Care | Year: 2014
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite recent advances in the management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by using protective ventilator strategies, the mortality rate of ARDS remains high. The complexity of the pathogenesis and the heterogeneity of coexisting diseases in patients with ARDS require critical care physicians and researchers to search for multiple therapeutic approaches in order to further improve patient outcome. This review article therefore focuses on the recent studies in the field of pharmacological intervention in ARDS. RECENT FINDINGS: A number of approaches for pharmacological intervention have been evaluated in patients with ARDS, but most of them failed to reduce mortality or improve outcomes despite some promising observations seen in preclinical studies. Prior methods such as nitric oxide inhalation, neuromuscular blocking agents and corticosteroids may still have a place in the treatment, while novel therapeutic approaches including the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins and stem cells are currently under investigation. SUMMARY: Overall, there is no proven pharmacological therapy in ARDS, but some pharmacological interventions were associated with beneficial effects in certain subgroups of patients depending on the cause, underlying diseases, the concurrent supportive therapies and timing. Further clinical trials are warranted to assess multiple outcome measurement of the promising pharmacological interventions in selected patients with ARDS. © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Liepe K.,GH Kassel |
Kotzerke J.,University Hospital Dresden
Methods | Year: 2011
Internal radiotherapy is effective in the treatment of metastatic bone pain and can improve quality of life. A number of controlled studies using various agents have shown a mean response rate in pain relief of 70-80% of treated patients. Some investigators prefer radionuclides which emit low beta particles for the treatment of bone pain, because the assumption of lower bone marrow toxicity of this agents. However, neither dosimetric data for radiation absorbed dose to the bone marrow nor clinical blood count depression have shown any significant differences between these agents. Other researchers suggest enhanced antitumoral effects using high-energy beta emitters and propose aggressive first-line treatment in the early disease stage instead of using these radiopharmaceuticals only in end-stage patients suffering intractable bone pain. Another approach consists of including other treatment modalities such as autologous stem cell rescue or in combination with chemo or bisphosphonate therapy to a radionuclide treatment scheme. Future research should focus more on the curative effects of combination with radiosensitizer, for example, chemotherapy, or repeated treatments with bone seeking agents. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.
Rachner T.D.,University Hospital Dresden |
Platzbecker U.,TU Dresden |
Felsenberg D.,Charite - Medical University of Berlin |
Hofbauer L.C.,TU Dresden
Mayo Clinic Proceedings | Year: 2013
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a common and potentially severe complication of antiresorptive therapy for bone metastases. However, its occurrence in patients treated for osteoporosis is rare. Although poor oral hygiene and invasive dental procedures have been identified as potential triggers, little is known about the role of other systemic risk factors. We describe a patient who developed ONJ after her first treatment with denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of NF-kB ligand. This patient had several comorbidities that prompted us to assess the German ONJ registry for the incidence of comorbidities in patients with ONJ. In summary, almost half of the patients (35 of 86 [41%]) had 1 or more risk factors thought to increase the risk of ONJ. In conclusion, comorbidities or comedications may increase the susceptibility of developing ONJ during osteoporosis therapy. © 2013 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.
Lenders J.W.M.,Radboud University Nijmegen |
Duh Q.-Y.,University of California at San Francisco |
Eisenhofer G.,University Hospital Dresden |
Gimenez-Roqueplo A.-P.,Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris |
And 6 more authors.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | Year: 2014
Objective: The aim was to formulate clinical practice guidelines for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). Participants: The Task Force included a chair selected by the Endocrine Society Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee (CGS), seven experts in the field, and a methodologist. The authors received no corporate funding or remuneration. Evidence: This evidence-based guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. The Task Force reviewed primary evidence and commissioned two additional systematic reviews. Consensus Process: One group meeting, several conference calls, and e-mail communications enabled consensus. Committees and members of the Endocrine Society, European Society of Endocrinology, and Americal Association for Clinical Chemistry reviewed drafts of the guidelines. Conclusions: The Task Force recommends that initial biochemical testing for PPGLs should include measurements of plasma free or urinary fractionated metanephrines. Consideration should be given to preanalytical factors leading to false-positive or false-negative results. All positive results require follow-up. Computed tomography is suggested for initial imaging, but magnetic resonance is a better option in patients with metastatic disease or when radiation exposure must be limited. 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy is a useful imaging modality for metastatic PPGLs. We recommend consideration of genetic testing in all patients, with testing by accredited laboratories. Patients with paraganglioma should be tested for SDHx mutations, and those with metastatic disease for SDHB mutations. All patients with functional PPGLs should undergo preoperative blockade to prevent perioperative complications. Preparation should include a high-sodium diet and fluid intake to prevent postoperative hypotension. We recommend minimally invasive adrenalectomy for most pheochromocytomas with open resection for most paragangliomas. Partial adrenalectomy is an option for selected patients. Lifelong follow-up is suggested to detect recurrent or metastatic disease. Wesuggest personalized management with evaluation and treatment by multidisciplin aryteams with appropriate expertise to ensure favorable outcomes. © 2014 by the Endocrine Society.
Schmitt J.,University Hospital Dresden |
Schmitt J.,TU Dresden |
Langan S.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine |
Deckert S.,University Hospital Dresden |
And 4 more authors.
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | Year: 2013
Background: Clinical signs are a core outcome domain for atopic dermatitis (AD) trials. The current lack of standardization of outcome measures in AD trials hampers evidence-based communication. Objective: We sought to provide evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of clinical signs in AD trials and to inform the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Atopic Dermatitis Initiative. Methods: We conducted a systematic review on measurement properties of outcome measurements for clinical signs of AD. We systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase (until October 1, 2012) for validation studies on instruments measuring the clinical signs of AD. Grading of the truth, discrimination, and feasibility of scales; methodological study quality; and recommendations were based on predefined criteria. Results: Sixteen eligible instruments were identified, of which 2 were best validated. The Eczema Area and Severity Index has adequate validity, responsiveness, internal consistency, intraobserver reliability, and intermediate interobserver reliability but unclear interpretability and feasibility. The Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis Index (SCORAD) has adequate validity, responsiveness, interobserver reliability, and interpretability and unclear intraobserver reliability. Only the objective SCORAD (ie, the clinical signs domain of the SCORAD) is internally consistent. The Six Area, Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis Index severity score and Three Item Severity Score fulfill some quality criteria, but the performance in other required measurement properties is unclear. The Patient-oriented Eczema Measure is reliable and responsive but has inadequate content validity to assess clinical signs of AD. The remaining 11 scales have either (almost) not been validated or performed inadequately. Conclusions: The Eczema Area and Severity Index and SCORAD are the best instruments to assess the clinical signs of AD. The other 14 instruments identified are (currently) not recommended because of unclear or inadequate measurement properties. © 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.