Time filter

Source Type

Chakraborty S.,The WB National University of Juridical Sciences
61st International Astronautical Congress 2010, IAC 2010 | Year: 2010

Space offers the potential for practically limitless wealth - some already being exploited, some we may only harness in the distant future, and undoubtedly some we cannot begin to guess. Realizing the potential to shape the course of human destiny, it's pertinent to incentivise entrepreneurial investment in space, by creating significant monetary prizes for the accomplishment of space missions and/or technology developments and by assuring property rights for those who seek to develop space resources and infrastructure. The current legal regime restrains the commercialization and development of outer space, and subsequently, its infinite economic and humanitarian rewards. Uncertainty in the legal consequences of space ventures make the vast potential rewards somewhat unattainable. The Outer Space Treaty (OST) of 1967 and its progeny established a basis for the allocation of property rights in outer space, subsumed under the concept of the 'common heritage of mankind', which is antithetical to the economic development of space resources; and is in contradiction to Article I of OST. Critics argue that the 'non-appropriation' clause in Article II of OST is a result of the socialist ideals that were prevalent at the time but is outdated and at odds with today's free market economy. It's also debatable whether Article II of OST and Article 11(2) of the Moon Treaty (MT), does include 'individual non-appropriation'. A regulatory system must be enacted that provides private enterprise with long-term predictability and minimizes regulatory interference. The purpose of this paper is to address: what is necessary to create a stable, yet equitable, legal regime that would incentivise private investment in space. The challenge is to build a regime that encourages the beneficial aspects of property rights, while formulating rules that discourage conflict and predation. How about the efficacy of market instruments - such as licensing, and quotas? Accordingly, Part II provides a brief introduction to space resources and their emerging commercial relevance. Part III discusses the Outer Space Treaty, resolving if it espouses a system of property rights. This section concludes delving on the need for a law of property, which follows as a natural corollary. Finally, Part IV analyses ideas and and proposals for an international legal regime to govern the use of outer space resources, providing some suggested changes in international space law - such as providing for a centralized development authority, on lines of the United Nations or the World Trade Organization. Copyright ©2010 by Mr. Subhayu Chakraborty. Published by the IAF, All rights reserved. Source

Jauhar A.,The WB National University of Juridical Sciences
Computer Law and Security Review | Year: 2011

The Copyright Act 1957 presents the face of modern copyright protection afforded to different intellectual works and is a key statement of intellectual property rights (IPR) in the Indian legislation governing this domain, as well as being compliant to the TRIPS Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. This Act has been acceptably referred to on many occasions on global platforms, on account of its being one of the most elaborate and well-structured pieces of legislation in the field of intellectual property law. However, this well encompassing, highly creditable and widely acknowledged legislation seems to fall down in its practical implementation rendering its theoretical purpose partly futile. The situation so stands, that India continues to project major piracy rates with little regression in the trend despite the fact that this law is still very much in force. The reasons which deny effective copyright protection in India, for works of miscellaneous categories, have much to do with the lack of an equally strong enforcement mechanism. This paper provides an insight into the inadequacies of the Indian legal and administrative systems which have ultimately diminished the effectiveness of the copyright regime contrary to that envisioned by the law. © 2011 Ameen Jauhar. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Source

Biswas T.K.,The WB National University of Juridical Sciences
Computer Law and Security Review | Year: 2011

Data and information constitute a valuable resource both for the companies in general and individuals in specific. The traditional paper based transaction has been replaced by electronic transaction and now a day's most of the valuable data and information's are stored in electronic medium. Therefore data and information security have become a matter of great concern for every agencies acting on faith of e-transaction. In India there remains an added significance owing to the fact that a growing number of companies seek more centralized and less expensive methods of processing information, they're turning to offshore outsourcing to fulfill many of their business and human resources processes. Data theft is not in itself a new concept, but has become an increasingly important issue in the digital age. The new mode of communication, its malleability, transmissibility, networking capacity, affect our lives in many and sometimes surprising ways, it requires that we find new legal solutions for new social questions. © 2011 Tushar K. Biswas. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Source

Nawn N.,TERI University | Nawn N.,The WB National University of Juridical Sciences
Journal of Agrarian Change | Year: 2016

In the literature on sustainability of agriculture, both labourers and workers are conspicuously absent. Here, the sustainability of agriculture has been defined in terms of whether the farm household in question is able to yield an energy surplus when its members and the animals in its possession are obtaining an adequate 'energy income' or Calorie intake. To evaluate the sustainability of 590 farming households in the state of West Bengal, India, during 2004-5, four progressively stricter definitions of sustainability have been proposed, defined and applied. The method of energy balance analysis was followed. A negative surplus was found to be near-universal across size-groups in terms of the net area sown (NAS), the gross cultivated area (GCA) and agro-climatic zones. The threshold output for a non-negative surplus during the cultivating period was 700,000 megajoules (MJ); in terms of the GCA for a positive 'full and final' annual surplus, it was 3 hectares, and in NAS terms it was 2.5 hectares; against NAS per household size, it was 0.6 hectares, for ensuring a positive surplus beyond the annual sustainability. No evidence could be found in favour of household size as an explanation for the negative surplus. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Source

Banerjee D.,The WB National University of Juridical Sciences
Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology | Year: 2010

One of the latest technologies to create a controversy is Google Earth, Google's Satellite Imaging technology. It is a useful educational, entertainment and navigational tool, but countries like Australia, China, India, etc have expressed concern about privacy and surveillance issues especially in the context of increased terrorism and state secrets being exposed to the general populace. Developed countries like the USA, UK and other European countries have not until now shown any interest in stringent action against Google as the current level of technology does not cause great concern as to what it does and where that technology is going. The option open to aggrieved nations are either to approach the US Government to ask its regulators to crack down or approach the United Nations on the basis of the Principles Relating to Remote Sensing adopted in 1986, which states that space imagery "shall not be conducted in such a manner detrimental to the legitimate rights and interests of the sensed [satellite scanned] state". A number of legal issues could arise regarding at what point geospatial information becomes personal information. In this light, this paper would analyze how far a technology of the calibre of Google Earth can affect the lives and liberties of an ordinary citizen. Though cases like Alan Boring v. Google, Smith v. Abandoned Ship, Kiryat Yam v. Google have been filed, they have not been very definitive in the arena. So the author will look at the principles of Tort law like Trespass (Hinman v. Pacific Air Transport), Nuisance (Brandes v. Mitterling), Strict Products Liability for inaccuracies in the program (Brocklesby v. United States) and Intellectual Property Rights (Skyline Software Systems, Inc. v. Keyhole, Inc.) to analyze probable issues and suggest plausible solutions to this conundrum within the existing international legal framework. In doing so, the doctrinal method shall be used and the author will study the various case laws, documents and state reactions to formulate the answers to the issues raised in this paper. Source

Discover hidden collaborations