News Article | May 29, 2017
The inaugural edition of INBA-LLM India Fairs was a highly successful two city event series being produced by Indian National Bar Association (INBA). -- The inaugural edition ofwas a highly successful two city event series being produced by Indian National Bar Association (INBA). These were held on 03of May, 2017 at Hotel Shangri-La Eros, New Delhi and on 05of May, 2017 at Hotel Shangri-La, Bangalore.These landmark two city fairs were aimed at providing the perfect platform for aspiring Indian law students on one hand, and globally reputed law schools and universities from USA, Europe, New Zealand and Australia to meet and explore mutually and academically beneficial avenues of learning and growth.The following law schools were represented at these fairs: :· Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law USA· The University of Western Australia Australia· UC Hastings College of The Law USA· American University Washington College of Law USA· Birmingham Law School United Kingdom· University Of California School of Law USA· UC Davis School of Law USA· The University of New South Wales Australia· Auckland Law School New Zealand· Queen Mary University of London United Kingdom· Australian National University Australia· The Graduate Institute Switzerland· University Of Southampton United Kingdom· Manchester Metropolitan Law School United Kingdom· University Of Maine School Of Law USAA concurrent seminar was also organized giving participating overseas schools an opportunity to present and demonstrate their sterling LLM syllabi and streams, details of scholarships and grants, campus amenities, and details of their illustrious faculty and acclaimed programs to a house full of law students and legal professionals.Speaking on the sidelines of the fair, Kaviraj Singh, Secretary General, Indian National Bar Association (INBA) said "This is a platform for Indian law students and law universities across the globe to come together on the same platform. The fair has been of great help to the students in India as it is being held in cooperation with leading foreign universities"Dr. B. Bala Bhaskar, Joint Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, Govt. of India and Mr. Anup Kumar Varshney, Joint Secretary & Legislative Counsel, Ministry of Law & Justice, Govt. of India were among the leading personalities who visited the fair in New Delhi and spent quality time with the participants. In the Bangalore edition, the Keynote Address was delivered by Mr.Senior Advocate, High Court of Karnataka and Additional Advocate General, Government of Karnataka. These two events also witnessed panel discussions on the most contemporary topics relating to global education.The event was attended in huge numbers by students from various law disciplines from across the northern and southern regions of the country. At times, they were also accompanied by their senior faculty members – thus paving way for healthy deliberations.State Bank of India – India's largest PSU Bank also contributed to the success of this event by disseminating valuable information about various student loan options to visitors.The last presentation was given by Ms. Samudra Kugel, Chief Officer, South Asia Law Initiatives, Center for International Education from University of California Davis tells the students about the US Law and how Indian Law study is different from US Law.Mr. S. Devishankar in his closing remarks thanked all the International Law Schools, Indian Law Colleges, students, Panelists and partners for being a part of this Fair and for their valuable support to making this event successful.The Fair ended with overseas law schools participants expressing their satisfaction with the quality turnout and the various networking opportunities. Good feedback from all the participants and appreciated to organizing this LLM Fair and also express their willingness to be a part of the Fair in near future. A huge applause was given to the Law Interns who worked round the Clock to make this event a Success.
Simoni V.,University of Lisbon |
Simoni V.,The Graduate Institute
Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change | Year: 2014
Building on tourism scholarship on existential authenticity, touristic intimacy, and the limitations of the tourist role, the article provides an empirically grounded analysis of how the value of intimacy was expressed and negotiated in the course of encounters between foreign tourists and members of the visited population in Cuba. Tourism-related identifications in this Caribbean country are shaped by local notions of tourism hustling and pose a challenge to the development of mutually gratifying relationships between tourists and Cubans. The exploration of Cubans' concerns and informal ways of approaching tourists, and of the ways in which friendships, partying, and sexual engagements between them were enacted, highlights the efforts of the protagonists of these encounters to achieve relationships that could help them move beyond negative identifications and lead to the recognition of their individuality and shared humanity as persons. Intimacy appears as a fundamental regime of value informing these processes. The reflections that the article develops on the concrete manifestations of intimacy in touristic encounters and the kind of alliances it prompted open the way for further research on the role played by international tourism in the diffusion and actualization of this regime of value. © 2014 © 2014 Taylor & Francis.
Mullan K.,North Carolina State University |
Kontoleon A.,University of Cambridge |
Swanson T.,The Graduate Institute |
Zhang S.,Beihang University
Land Use Policy | Year: 2011
Competing uses of land mean that regulations aimed at environmental conservation often conflict with the land-use rights of rural households. Several reports suggest that this has occurred with the introduction of the Natural Forest Protection Programme (NFPP) in China, one of the world's largest logging ban programmes. This paper investigates whether households should be compensated for infringements on property rights, drawing on institutional economics literature on regulation. We distinguish between cases where regulation solves local collective action problems and increases the welfare of those affected, and those where regulation involves a redistribution of rights from one group to another. We apply this to the NFPP by estimating the net welfare impacts, using household level stated preference data with econometric techniques that explicitly account for zero and negative values of the dependent variable. We find that the ban on logging does not affect the net welfare of the affected forest communities. This indicates that the losses resulting from the restrictions on property rights are offset by the benefits from restrictions on other local households. We also find evidence that a partial reduction in logging would be welfare increasing, indicating that the NFPP is to some extent addressing local collective action problems in forest areas. Broader implications for the question of compensating for infringement of property rights as the result of regulatory interventions in contexts of institutional imperfections are also drawn. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
Baldwin R.E.,The Graduate Institute |
Baldwin R.E.,Center for Economic Policy Research |
Evenett S.J.,University of St. Gallen |
Evenett S.J.,Center for Economic Policy Research
Journal of Regional Science | Year: 2015
The factors responsible for the spatial reorganization of contemporary manufacturing are presented here and the predictive power of long-standing notions of comparative advantage revisited. While a growing number of commercial tasks and technologies are in principle mobile internationally, giving rise to the perception of evermore footloose manufacturing firms and greater job insecurity, there is much in the modern organization of manufacturing that is both viscid and involves location-specific competitive advantages. This calls for a more nuanced assessment of the impact of an open world trading system on the spatial division of labor and on living standards. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Djajic S.,The Graduate Institute |
Michael M.S.,University of Cyprus
Journal of International Trade and Economic Development | Year: 2013
This article examines the interaction between migration policies of the host and source countries in the context of a model of guest-worker migration. For the host, the objective is to provide low-cost labor for its employers while avoiding illegal immigration. It optimizes over these objectives by setting the time limit of a guest-worker permit. The source country seeks remittance flows and return migration by offering fiscal benefits to returnees. Within this framework, we solve for the Nash equilibrium values of the migration policy instruments and compare them, to the extent possible, with the ones that emerge in a cooperative setting. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
Eichengreen B.,University of California at Berkeley |
Panizza U.,The Graduate Institute
Economic Policy | Year: 2016
IMF forecasts and the EU's Fiscal Compact foresee Europe's heavily indebted countries running primary budget surpluses of as much as 5 percent of GDP for as long as 10 years in order to maintain debt sustainability and bring their debt/GDP ratios down to the Compact's 60 percent target. We show that primary surpluses this large and persistent are rare. In an extensive sample of high- and middle-income countries there are just three (non-overlapping) episodes where countries ran primary surpluses of at least 5 per cent of GDP for 10 years. Analyzing a less restrictive definition of persistent surplus episodes (primary surpluses averaging at least 3 percent of GDP for five years), we find that surplus episodes are more likely when growth is strong, when the current account of the balance of payments is in surplus (savings rates are high), when the debt-to-GDP ratio is high (heightening the urgency of fiscal adjustment), and when the governing party controls all houses of parliament or congress (its bargaining position is strong). Left wing governments, strikingly, are more likely to run large, persistent primary surpluses. In advanced countries, proportional representation electoral systems that give rise to encompassing coalitions are associated with surplus episodes. The point estimates do not provide much encouragement for the view that high-debt European countries will be able to run a primary budget surplus as large and persistent as officially projected. © 2016 CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po.
Zanchetta B.,The Graduate Institute
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism | Year: 2016
Operation Condor was a transnational network of organized state-sponsored terrorism that targeted Communist “subversion.” It was operational in the second half of the 1970s. The key member countries were Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Brazil (Peru and Equador joined the network later on, with a more marginal role). Based on declassified documents from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Geneva and on U.S. documents of various origin, this article will assess the development of the Condor network and the U.S. reaction to such manifest acts of state-sponsored terrorism. © 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Biersteker T.,The Graduate Institute
Globalizations | Year: 2014
Abstract: Drawing on the synthetic, open-ended dialectical approach developed in the Dialectics of World Orders Project, this article explores three global doctrinal debates (fusing ideas and policy practices) in three different periods that have shaped global security in the twentieth century. The article focuses first on a detailed examination of the system of great power balancing that opened the twentieth century, with special attention to its internal logic, inner workings (rules and practices), its internal contradictions, and how they generated a demand for greater institutionalization and the establishment of a system of collective security. The breakdown of collective security under the League is considered, and its re-emergence within the UN system (in a transformed state), and its subsequent marginalization by superpower Cold War power balancing in the post WWII period is described next. Again, the internal logic, inner workings (rules and practices), and internal contradictions of the security system of Cold War bipolarity are described, as well as how its collapse generated space for a more effective collective security system in the post-Cold War period. The current contestation over norms of intervention, the redefinition of sovereignty, power transitions, responses to transnational threats, and emergent elements of the contemporary security order are also identified. The article concludes with some reflections on insights gained from looking at global security debates through dialectical lenses. © 2014, © 2014 Taylor & Francis.
White N.,The Graduate Institute
British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies | Year: 2015
This article addresses the role of natural resources in the protracted conflict between Morocco and Western Sahara. Drawing from literatures of political ecology and political science, the article argues that natural resources have been deeply implicated in the conflict over time, with resource-related developments lending legitimacy to each party in different ways. The complex political economy of resource exploitation and the associated geopolitical enjeux have led to the de facto recognition of Morocco’s occupation, and the symbolic aspects of natural resources have lent the Sahrawi cause legitimacy and an important node around which allies can be mobilised. That sovereignty is contested has facilitated a discourse in a different, more powerful way than when it is not in question, particularly in the Sahrawi’s capacity to invoke international law to support their case. Drawing on the cases of South Sudan and Indonesia, the article ends with a brief discussion of the potential of the region’s high-value resources for peace-making activities. © 2014, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies.