Ono S.,University of Tokyo |
Fujishiro M.,University of Tokyo |
Kanzaki H.,Japan National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute |
Uedo N.,Japan National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute |
And 21 more authors.
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia) | Year: 2011
Background and Aims: Although there are guidelines for the management of antithrombotic agents during the periendoscopic period, gaps between various guidelines create a confusing situation in daily clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to examine the current management of antithrombotic agents during the periendoscopic period in Japan. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study in 12 high-volume endoscopy centers in Japan. A total of 970 outpatients receiving antithrombotic agents underwent endoscopies (705 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and 265 colonoscopies) with or without invasive procedures. Main outcome measures are adverse events in these patients. Results: Need for cessation of antithrombotics before endoscopy was mostly determined by non-gastroenterologists (51%) who are unfamiliar with the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) guideline, although cessation periods after endoscopy for most patients were determined by endoscopists (78%). Consequently, most patients underwent endoscopy without cessation (25%) or after a cessation period of 6-7days (33%), indicating low permeation of the JGES guideline in Japan. Among 970 patients, two patients experienced major complications that may be related to thromboembolic events or gastrointestinal bleeding (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0-0.7%). One of these patients died due to sudden onset ventricular tachycardia. Invasive procedures, including 40 biopsies and two mucosal resections, were performed in 42 patients without cessation of antithrombotics, and no patients experienced major complications (95% CI: 0-8.4%). Conclusions: This study revealed a conflicting clinical environment due to absence of a unified guideline in Japan. Further accumulation of data is mandatory to establish a unified guideline based upon solid evidence. © 2011 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. Source
Abe S.,Tonan Hospital |
Tsuji Y.,Tonan Hospital |
Tsushima T.,Tonan Hospital |
Kogawa T.,Tonan Hospital |
And 8 more authors.
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology | Year: 2010
Objective: Although combination chemotherapy with 3 weeks of S-1 and cisplatin is effective for advanced gastric cancer, the toxicities of S-1 which mostly occur during the third week of administration are a major problem. To achieve fewer adverse effects with S-1 and higher dose intensity of cisplatin, we performed combination chemotherapy with 2 weeks of S-1 and cisplatin as first line. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the efficacy and feasibility of this regimen. Methods: S-1 (40-60 mg depending on patient's body surface area) was given orally twice daily for 2 consecutive weeks, and 70 mg/m2 cisplatin was given intravenously on day 8, followed by a 2-week rest period. Results: Forty-eight patients received a total of 184 courses of chemotherapy. Overall response rate was 40.6% and median survival time was 411 days. Dose intensities were 257.6 mg/m2/week for S-1 and 16.4 mg/m2/week for cisplatin. The incidences of grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were leucopenia (19%), neutropenia (29%) and anaemia (17%), and those of grade 3 non-haematological toxicities were anorexia (31%) and nausea (21%). The rate of treatment discontinuation owing to toxicity was 10%. Conclusions: This regimen may be effective as an alternative therapy to 3 weeks of S-1 and cisplatin to reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. © The Author (2010). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Source