News Article | April 17, 2017
Drs. Emma Renaudo and Edward Esposito of Advanced Rehabilitation of Jersey City (ARJC) recently became certified in Cox Technic therapy, a clinically proven disc decompression technique to manage disc bulges and herniations. According to the Cox Technic website, the therapy is an “evidence-based spinal manipulation with a rich history of clinical and biomechanical research efforts performed in laboratories [...] with practitioner excitement and desire to show what is possible with non-surgical, chiropractic spine care for many spine conditions.” Drs. Renaudo and Esposito attended a Cox Technic course in Fort Wayne, IN to become certified. They say they're bringing that knowledge back to Jersey City to offer better, more comprehensive care for their patients. According to Cox Technic, the benefits of the therapy include reducing pain in the lower back, legs, neck and arms, as well as reducing pain caused by disc herniation, a slipped or ruptured disc, facet syndrome, stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and other conditions. ARJC employs a wide variety of medical specialists in order to care for their patients. A team of chiropractors, physical therapists and on-staff neurologist and pain management specialist provide relief to patients from Jersey City and surrounding areas, including Bayonne and Hoboken. The practice offers a number of services, including chiropractic, pain management, massage and physical therapy and accident rehabilitation. A comprehensive clinic, the practitioners also offer nutrition, diet, exercise and supplementation consultations to support patient health. Dr. Esposito graduated in 1996 from Life Chiropractic in Atlanta, GA, and went on to study the Pettibon System in his post-graduate years. In addition to working for ARJC, Esposito has worked as the team chiropractor for the Newark Bears, a medical examiner for the Department of Transportation, and a physician for city employees. Dr. Renaudo graduated from the University of Bridgeport, CT in 2012, and has been working with the team at ARJC for almost five years. She specializes in sports injuries, pain management and rehabilitation--care skills that will be further strengthened by her Cox Therapy knowledge. “Becoming a certified Cox therapist has greatly expanded my capacity to care for my patients. Providing the most up-to-date, effective treatment is a cornerstone of effective health care.” said Dr. Esposito. Visit http://www.jerseycitypainmanagement.com/ or call (201) 795-1665 to learn more.
News Article | April 24, 2017
Aircraft Line Maintenance -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021Pune , India - April 24, 2017 /MarketersMedia/ — Aircraft Line Maintenance Industry Description Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Aircraft Line Maintenance -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database This report studies sales (consumption) of Aircraft Line Maintenance in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering STS Aviation Group Lufthansa Technik AG L-3 Communications MAS Delta TechOps Monarch Aircraft Engineering SIA Engineering SR Technics British Airways Engineering Hong Kong Aircraft Engineering TAP Maintenance & Engineering Turkish Technic Nayak Tsukish Technic Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/770197-global-aircraft-line-maintenance-sales-market-report-2016 Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Aircraft Line Maintenance in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like United States China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Aircraft Line Maintenance in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Leave a Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/770197-global-aircraft-line-maintenance-sales-market-report-2016 Table of Contents Global Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales Market Report 2016 1 Aircraft Line Maintenance Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Aircraft Line Maintenance 1.2 Classification of Aircraft Line Maintenance 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Aircraft Line Maintenance 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Aircraft Line Maintenance Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Aircraft Line Maintenance (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Aircraft Line Maintenance Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) ... 7 Global Aircraft Line Maintenance Manufacturers Analysis 7.1 STS Aviation Group 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.1.2 Aircraft Line Maintenance Product Type, Application and Specification 184.108.40.206 Type I 220.127.116.11 Type II 7.1.3 STS Aviation Group Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Lufthansa Technik AG 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.2.2 111 Product Type, Application and Specification 18.104.22.168 Type I 22.214.171.124 Type II 7.2.3 Lufthansa Technik AG Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 L-3 Communications MAS 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.3.2 135 Product Type, Application and Specification 126.96.36.199 Type I 188.8.131.52 Type II 7.3.3 L-3 Communications MAS Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Delta TechOps 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.4.2 Nov Product Type, Application and Specification 184.108.40.206 Type I 220.127.116.11 Type II 7.4.3 Delta TechOps Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Monarch Aircraft Engineering 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 18.104.22.168 Type I 22.214.171.124 Type II 7.5.3 Monarch Aircraft Engineering Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 SIA Engineering 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification 126.96.36.199 Type I 188.8.131.52 Type II 7.6.3 SIA Engineering Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 SR Technics 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.7.2 Aerospace & Defense Product Type, Application and Specification 184.108.40.206 Type I 220.127.116.11 Type II 7.7.3 SR Technics Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 British Airways Engineering 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 18.104.22.168 Type I 22.214.171.124 Type II 7.8.3 British Airways Engineering Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Hong Kong Aircraft Engineering 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 126.96.36.199 Type I 188.8.131.52 Type II 7.9.3 Hong Kong Aircraft Engineering Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 TAP Maintenance & Engineering 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 184.108.40.206 Type I 220.127.116.11 Type II 7.10.3 TAP Maintenance & Engineering Aircraft Line Maintenance Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 Turkish Technic 7.12 Nayak 7.13 Tsukish Technic Buy now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=770197 Continued... Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.Com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (US) Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (UK) Contact Info:Name: NORAH TRENTEmail: firstname.lastname@example.orgOrganization: WISE GUY RESEARCH CONSULTANTS PVT LTDAddress: Office No. 528, Amanora Chambers Magarpatta Road, Hadapsar Pune - 411028Phone: +91 841 198 5042Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/aircraft-line-maintenance-market-2017-global-analysis-opportunities-and-forecast-to-2022/189438For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/770197-global-aircraft-line-maintenance-sales-market-report-2016Source: MarketersMediaRelease ID: 189438
News Article | May 2, 2017
Advanced Rehabilitation of Jersey City recently announced that they will be offering Cox Technic therapy services after two of their on-staff doctors became certified in the technique. Cox Technic therapy is an “evidence-based spinal manipulation with a rich history of clinical and biomechanical research efforts performed in laboratories [...] with practitioner excitement and desire to show what is possible with non-surgical, chiropractic spine care for many spine conditions.” The therapy is useful in treating and managing a number of different conditions, especially neck pain, as it reduces pressure on the vertebrae. Treatment typically involves spinal flexion-distraction and decompression, in addition to a number of protocols, including: “electrical stimulation, physiological therapeutics, including heat and ice therapy, massage therapy, trigger point therapy, exercise, nutrition, neck or back braces, back school instruction, pain management, X-rays, MRI / imaging, and ergonomic training.” Neck pain can be caused by any number of factors, including physical and environmental. Stress on the vertebrae from trauma and poor posture can lead to a lifetime of neck pain if left untreated. Non-surgical interventions like Cox Therapy are recommended as a first line of defense in treating neck pain. “Treating neck pain is a process that involves both the patient and the health care provider. At ARJC, we work towards creating an individualized care program that works for each patient and responds to their particular needs and life circumstances. Sometimes treatment is as simple as identifying environmental causes of pain, like a poorly-designed workspace or long commute. With just a few short treatments, many of our patients find relief.” said a staff member. In addition to Cox Therapy, ARJC offers a wide variety of services to address neck pain. The clinic staff includes a number of medical specialists who care care for patients. In addition to an on-staff neurologist and pain management specialist, a team of chiropractors and physical therapists are available. In addition to chiropractic, pain management, massage and physical therapy and accident rehabilitation services, the clinic also offers nutrition, diet, exercise and supplementation consultations to support overall patient health. Neck pain sufferers from Jersey City, Hoboken, Bayonne and surrounding areas are encouraged to contact ARJC for a consultation to learn more about what treatment options are available to them. Visit http://www.jerseycitypainmanagement.com/ or call (201) 795-1665 to learn more.
News Article | May 3, 2017
NEW YORK, United States — As well as being one of Superdrug’s biggest sellers and attracting hordes of fawning reviews from beauty vloggers, Makeup Revolution has received a thumbs up from Khloe Kardashian, who praised one of the brand’s $6 highlighters last year. You might not see Superdrug’s products endorsed by Vogue, but it’s the influencers who have far more, well, influence these days. Once you’ve received the Kardashian kiss of approval, it’s pretty much a given that your brand is going to fly. Just look at makeup brand Ben Nye’s Banana Powder: once endorsed by Kim Kardashian, it became an overnight success. One of Makeup Revolution’s most recent launches is a Banana Powder dupe. The packaging looks almost identical to Ben Nye’s product, which costs $25 for a 3 oz. container. Makeup Revolution’s dupe costs $8. Adam Minto, founder of Makeup Revolution (also known as MUR) and its parent company TAM Beauty, has said that he aims to make “quality makeup accessible to everyone.” “Makeup should not be elitist,” Minto noted at a MUR press event in March 2016. “[It] shouldn’t be based on your ability or your willingness to pay more.” Given that some designer foundations can set you back over $100, Minto has a point. The main point of contention with MUR though is that it gravitates towards packaging its products in a similar manner to bigger, longer-established, higher-priced brands. Most recently, two of MUR’s freshest launches have caused a particular fuss. Kat Von D publicly dubbed the brand “lazy f*cks” in an Instagram post, as she compared the appearance of her $48 “Shade & Light” eye contour palette with MUR’s $15 “Ultra” eye contour palette. “I don’t remember the tails being this heavy when I first got this coat,” she added. Prior to Von D’s public outrage, Beauty by the Bunny blogger Angela Collinson published “Why I Won’t Be Duped — Have (sic) Makeup Revolution Gone Too Far?” in which she criticised TAM Beauty for its “blatant copying of other brands,” accusing the company of “flood[ing] the budget beauty market with their [sic] low quality copies, regardless of how good the product may or may not be.” In Collinson’s direct firing line were MUR’s "Renaissance" lipsticks. With their luxurious-looking rose gold hue and ribbed casing, they do, as the blogger claims, look a lot like Charlotte Tilbury’s now-iconic lipsticks. The greatest blow is served in the fact that MUR’s lipsticks cost $6.50, in comparison to Tilbury’s $34. “[Tilbury’s] lipsticks are such high quality and there is no way that the cheap dupes can even come close … Mr. Minto knows that,” Collinson wrote, adding that Minto’s practices are “dishonest and wrong and I really hope that Charlotte Tilbury takes action against him.” I reached out to Minto for comment and, while telling me apologetically that he wasn't keen to comment on the situation with Charlotte Tilbury or Kat Von D, he said of his brand: “Revolution is the recognised leader in fast beauty. We bring new trends and formulation, fast, to the consumer who seeks amazing quality at an affordable and accessible price point.” When I asked makeup fans for their opinions on MUR’s "duping" of pricier brands, the responses were mixed. Many, like Emma, 19, can attest to the products’ quality, and aren’t fussed about copycat packaging: “I like MUR simply because I’m poor,” she said. “They have great colour dupes and the quality is amazing considering the price.” Others said that they aren’t keen on MUR’s more “obvious” packaging dupes, but admit that their low price trumps all. “I get the moral issues with duping, but I also get that my pocketbook and my children mean I need to look for alternatives to high-end palettes,” said Anya, 26.“The only way I came close to [Too Faced’s] Chocolate Bar collections was through [MUR’s] I Heart Chocolate range.” Others were less kind. “It’s like stealing; they’re profiting off someone else’s ideas,” said Shana, 23. One person I spoke to questioned the legality of duping: “Brands like Sleek and NYX have cheap, good-quality products that aren’t dupes,” said 24-year-old Charlie. “It’s MUR’s packaging that’s the problem; some of it’s a blatant rip-off [of other brands']. Why haven’t they been sued yet?” And it’s not just consumers who are concerned about MUR’s duping strategy. John Noble, director of the British Brands Group, has been campaigning against copycat packaging — or what the BBG dubs “parasitic packaging” — since 1994, so has plenty to say on the matter. “A product should stand on its own merit, not masquerade as something else,” he explained to me. “Dupe brands copy the signals we associate with a familiar brand. This tricks the consumer because all of the expectations we have of product performance, we transfer into the [dupe] product.” But how far can brands like MUR go with their copycat practices until they land in legal hot water? Noble concedes that it’s a grey area, as savvy brands “can easily find loopholes within the regulations for IP and trademark rights — they know what they have to avoid so they’re not infringing anything.” Digging deeper into intellectual property law, the vagaries, even to the legally untrained eye, quickly become apparent, so I spoke to specialist IP lawyers Birgit Clark and Sabrina Tozzi, from Baker Mckenzie, who explained that trade mark registrations are reserved for distinctive “signs” that designate “trade origin.” “In the absence of convincing evidence of ‘acquired distinctiveness’ of these signs in the consumer’s eyes, it's very difficult to obtain trade mark protection for colours or shapes,” said Clark. “The legal rationale is that consumers are not in the habit of making assumptions about the trade origin of goods based on their colour or their colour of packaging, unless the colour is combined with a graphic or word element.” Because of this, it’s difficult for Charlotte Tilbury — or any other brand — to register a trademark for a particular lipstick bullet design or shade. “There may be other types of intellectual property right at play,” Tozzi added, “but the cost and time involved in trying to enforce those rights, when the infringement is not clear-cut, may mean high-end brands are reluctant to take action against lookalikes.” The copying of higher-priced brands is widespread — you’ll see it on the shelves in discount supermarket Aldi as frequently as you will on drugstore beauty stands. And then, of course, there’s fashion’s drawn-out, unclear relationship with copyright. The irrepressible rise of fast fashion means that companies like Zara have become notorious for producing cheap designer knockoffs. Julie Zerbo, the brains behind The Fashion Law, has made a name for herself by calling out high-street brands for ripping off runway looks. So, in this sense, what Minto is doing with TAM Beauty is nothing new. MUR is far from alone in mimicking other brands. A quick Google search unmasks other offenders — budget brands W7 and Technic appear particularly fond of duping Benefit Cosmetics’s packaging, for example — and even popular drugstore brands have been accused of stealing ideas from the luxury beauty sector in the past, with a notable example being Maybelline’s Fit Me Concealer, which is packaged similarly to NARS’s Radiant Creamy Concealer. Cosmetics are a booming business, and brands without huge advertising budgets can find success through social media and influencer marketing. We’re all wising up to the fact that you don’t need to break the bank to look good. 10 years ago, the words “budget beauty” would cause any self-respecting make-up lover's heckles to rise, conjuring up mental images of gloopy lip-glosses, clumpy mascaras, and base products in limited, unrealistic shades. While the latter hasn’t improved — most drugstore brands still offer a paltry range of foundation shades, biased towards Caucasian skins — much else, quality-wise, has. Brand snobbery, however, still exists. If MUR’s products weren’t as cheap, would they come under fire so frequently? In his TED talk “The Origins of Pleasure,” psychologist Paul Bloom touches upon the fact that we take the origin of products so seriously because we are “snobs … so focused on status. If you want to show off how rich you are, how powerful you are, it’s always better to own an original than a forgery.” Arguably, the same principles can be applied to the way we react to beauty brands, especially as for many of us purchasing designer cosmetics is the closest we’ll come to being luxury-brand consumers. Which would you be keener to put on Instagram: a photo of your new Charlotte Tilbury lipstick, or your new MUR one? As someone whose makeup-related posts on Instagram feature luxury brands almost exclusively, I know which option I’d pick. Grace Howard is a final-year English & Linguistics student and freelance journalist specialising in the fashion and beauty business. The views expressed in Op-Ed pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Business of Fashion.
News Article | May 24, 2017
Slamming 2,700 plastic blocks into a wall at 46 kilometers an hour is oddly beautiful. The ADAC, the German equivalent of AAA, sent a $300 Lego Porsche 911 GT3 RS set down its test track in Landsberg to see what would happen and that wasn't without its surprises. It turns out, the Lego chassis had no problems with the high-speed crash, and the point of failure was the connectors between the pieces. The ADAC conducted the test in partnership with Computer Technic magazine, which wrote about the Lego Porsche in December 2016. The publication, being run by people with a strict editorial standard, aims to "test all of the products they report" and what resulted was the Youtube gold above.
News Article | May 24, 2017
Car fans and plastic-brick fans alike welcomed the introduction of the stunning Lego Technic Porsche 911 GT3 RS kit last year. Now you can watch with a mix of awe, horror and wonderment as all 2,704 pieces of that pristine model ram into a wall for a toy-sized crash test. The crash test video, released on Tuesday, comes from German automobile club ADAC. It kicks off with an unboxing and a time-lapse of the build, which is no easy feat. Lego suggests the kit is best for builders age 16 and over. The ADAC's test track is a miniature version of a real crash-test setup. Luxuriate in the slow-motion footage of doom as the Porsche hurtles towards a wall and then splits into its individual Lego components. See the dance of destruction from every possible angle. The ADAC notes that the pieces themselves held up well, but the connection points where the bricks click together were the weak spots. Let's just say that Lego cars aren't designed with crumple zones.
Schetty R.,Technic Inc.
Electrical Contacts, Proceedings of the Annual Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts | Year: 2015
Tin whiskers are thin, crystalline, conductive filaments that can emanate from electrodeposited tin coatings, which pose electrical reliability concerns. Several driving forces for tin whisker growth related to deposit stress have been identified and accelerated test methods have been developed to simulate these. Preferred crystal orientation (texture) and grain size of electrodeposited matte tin have been found to be correlated with whisker growth propensity. This paper examines tin whisker growth properties of electroplated matte tin deposits with specific crystal orientations <220> and <321> and grain sizes (5-8 μm diameter vs. 1-4μm diameter), using tin whisker tests designed to simulate stress formation due to ambient storage (30°C/60%) RH, 4000 hrs), high temperature and humidity storage (55°C/85% RH, 4000 hrs), thermal coefficient of expansion mismatch (TC +85°C/-55°C, 1500 cycles), externally applied forces (2000g load size/1 mm diameter, 48 hrs), and corrosion (85°C/85% RH, 1000 hrs). In addition, these whisker results are compared to a tin deposit with <112> and <101> crystal orientations. The data and observations of the experiments are discussed in this paper. © 2014 IEEE.
Technic Inc. | Date: 2014-12-18
A process for creating a predictive data set predicting the amount of target constituents are in an electrolyte solution at varying temperatures is provided. The process includes (a) obtaining a sample set in which each sample comprises an electrolyte solution of known composition; (b) obtaining an electroanalytical response for each sample in the sample set to produce a electroanalytical response data set at a pre-determined, chosen target temperature; (c) obtaining a plurality of training sets, each training set being measured at a different pre-selected temperature in a range of low to high temperatures that comprises the sample set and corresponds to the electroanalytical response data set; (d) analyzing each of the training sets individually using decomposition and multivariate regression methods to produce a plurality of regression data sets, each at different temperature; and (e) validating the plurality of training data sets to produce a predictive data set for predictive calibration models, each at different temperatures in the pre-selected range of low to high temperatures.
Technic Inc. | Date: 2015-07-10
A process for quantifying, by means of soft modeling, the characteristics of an electroplating solution is provided. The process includes (a) obtaining a sample set, wherein each sample comprises a plating solution of proper performance, (b) obtaining an electrochemical response (in form of a tensor) for each of the sample to produce a multi-way electrochemical response data set, (c) obtaining a training set that comprises the sample set and corresponding the multi-way electrochemical response data set, (d) analyzing the training set by soft modeling using multi-way decomposition method coupled with outlier-detection analysis methods to produce a outlier-detection parameters data set, and (e) validating said training data set by soft modeling to produce the multi-way predictive data set for a predictive model.
Technic Inc. | Date: 2015-03-02
personal care products, namely, skin creams, skin lotions, skin moisturizers, shower gels, skin exfoliant and make-up remover.