SunGard is an American multinational company based in Wayne, Pennsylvania, which provides software and services to education, financial services, and public sector organizations. It was formed in 1983, as a spin-off of the computer services division of Sun Oil Company. The name of the company originally was an acronym which stood for Sun Guaranteed Access to Recovered Data, a reference to the disaster recovery business it helped pioneer. SunGard is ranked at 480th in the U.S. Fortune 500 list in the year 2012.In August 2005 the company was acquired by seven private equity firms and de-listed from the NYSE.SunGard was one of the title sponsors of the Tinkoff-Saxo pro cycling team until the end of 2011. Wikipedia.
News Article | April 18, 2017
Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Student Information System -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database This report studies sales (consumption) of Student Information System in Global market, especially in USA, China, Europe, Japan, Korea and Taiwan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Eduware Ellucian Jenzabar Skyward SunGard Campus Management Focus School Software Foradian Technologies Illuminate Education Unit4 Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Student Information System in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like USA China Europe Japan Korea Taiwan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Student Information System in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Student Information System Sales Market Report 2016 1 Student Information System Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Student Information System 1.2 Classification of Student Information System 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Student Information System 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Student Information System Market by Regions 1.4.1 USA Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Korea Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 Taiwan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Student Information System (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Student Information System Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Student Information System Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 9 Global Student Information System Manufacturers Analysis 9.1 Eduware 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Student Information System Product Type, Application and Specification 220.127.116.11 Type I 18.104.22.168 Type II 9.1.3 Eduware Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Ellucian 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 123 Product Type, Application and Specification 22.214.171.124 Type I 126.96.36.199 Type II 9.2.3 Ellucian Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 Jenzabar 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 146 Product Type, Application and Specification 188.8.131.52 Type I 184.108.40.206 Type II 9.3.3 Jenzabar Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 Skyward 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Sept Product Type, Application and Specification 220.127.116.11 Type I 18.104.22.168 Type II 9.4.3 Skyward Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 SunGard 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 22.214.171.124 Type I 126.96.36.199 Type II 9.5.3 SunGard Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Campus Management 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification 188.8.131.52 Type I 184.108.40.206 Type II 9.6.3 Campus Management Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 Focus School Software 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Electronics Product Type, Application and Specification 220.127.116.11 Type I 18.104.22.168 Type II 9.7.3 Focus School Software Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Foradian Technologies 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 22.214.171.124 Type I 126.96.36.199 Type II 9.8.3 Foradian Technologies Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 Illuminate Education 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 188.8.131.52 Type I 184.108.40.206 Type II 9.9.3 Illuminate Education Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Unit4 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 220.127.116.11 Type I 18.104.22.168 Type II 9.10.3 Unit4 Student Information System Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/655407-global-student-information-system-sales-market-report-2016
News Article | April 19, 2017
eOriginal, Inc., the digital transaction expert, is pleased to announce that Brian Madocks has been named chief executive officer of the Baltimore-based software company. eOriginal is experiencing hyper-growth and recently completed a funding cycle led by LLR Partners to support market demand, expand its product offerings, accelerate hiring and invest in customer services. Madocks joins the team with more than 25 years’ experience in business technology and application software solutions. Over his career, he has served as CEO of Revitas, Inc., Vitalyst, Inc. and SunGard Higher Education, as well as senior vice president and general manager of SAP America. Each of these companies grew significantly under Madocks’ leadership and resulted in successful outcomes for customers, partners, employees and shareholders. Madocks will report to eOriginal’s board of directors. “Market readiness, the investment from LLR and the support of our customers and partners are pulling us forward. Brian’s knowledge and experience in leading companies through rapid expansions will enable eOriginal to reach its full potential,” stated Stephen Bisbee, co-founder of eOriginal. “This change in leadership will fuel eOriginal’s growth and accelerate our ability to provide excellent products and services to our customers.” Bisbee will continue with eOriginal in the role of president. “eOriginal is uniquely positioned as the leading provider in the rapidly expanding digital transaction management marketplace,” said Madocks. “The company has a well-earned reputation as the industry thought leader and the most trusted provider of digital asset management solutions to financial services. I am excited to join eOriginal and look forward to working with Steve and the team to expand our offerings, capabilities and investment in our people, products, customers and partners.” “We are pleased to welcome Brian to eOriginal as we continue to scale the enterprise to meet the demands of being the leading digital financial services platform,” said Gary Wood, PhD, executive chairman of eOriginal. “Brian’s presence enables Steve Bisbee, a true thought leader in digital transaction management, to focus on the company’s efforts in new vertical markets, product evolution, digital mortgage, expansion of intellectual property and enables him to work with customers to accelerate their move to fully digital processes.” Through its eAsset® Management platform, eOriginal provides the maintenance, control and use of critical documents that have an intrinsic value, such as loan and lease agreements. It maintains and protects these assets in a fully digital environment throughout their entire lifecycle, including post-signature execution that ultimately results in verification, collateralization, securitization or pledging in the secondary markets. By maintaining the authenticity of original documents, the identity of the signatories and the integrity of the content, eOriginal enables customers to realize the true benefits of completed digital transaction management and the resulting business-process improvements. As a result, lenders can respond quickly to auditors and regulators with a new level of transparency, in real time and across various document types over the entire chain of custody. About eOriginal, Inc. Founded in 1996, eOriginal is the trusted expert in digital transaction management solutions, specializing in the post-execution management of financial asset documentation. eOriginal SmartSign® and eAsset® Management Services enable an end-to-end solution for fully electronic transactions that must be managed with the highest levels of security and compliance throughout their lifecycle. By treating every transaction as having assets that must be verifiably secure, legally compliant and enforceable, eOriginal provides its customers and partners with eCertainty®. For more information, please visit http://www.eoriginal.com. eOriginal®, eAsset®, eOriginal SmartSign® and eCertainty® are trademarks of eOriginal, Inc. and are registered in the United States or in other jurisdictions.
News Article | April 27, 2017
Global Disaster Recovery as a Service market is expected to grow from $ 1.15 billion in 2015 to reach $ 14.21 billion by 2022 with a CAGR of 43.18%. Rising implementation of virtualization technologies, increasing preference for commoditized IT services to run businesses is key movement in disaster recovery as a service market. Rising investments in unruly cloud technologies, conventional use of big data applications and the requirement for Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) disaster recovery, legislation of rigorous disaster recovery policy are some of the major factors favouring the market growth. However, sufficient site departure between primary and backup site and compatibility anxiety of certain applications in the cloud environment are most important challenges towards the development of the global disaster recovery as a service market. Professional services are likely to have the leading market share in Disaster Recovery as a Service market as these services facilitate enterprises to prefer the best probable resolution and services depending upon the business desires and also distribute cost-effective and backup support for technical queries to avoid any downtime. North America is expected to hold the largest market share of Disaster Recovery as a Service Market due to large investments in cloud-based solutions, early adoption of new and emerging technologies, and high penetration of internet. The key players in the Disaster Recovery as a Service market are identified as Windstream Communications, SunGard Data Systems, Verizon Communication, Inc., Geminare, Inc., IBM Corp., Databarracks Ltd., Amazon.com, Inc., QuorumLabs, Inc., Columbus Business Solutions, NTT Communications, EMC Corp., HP Co., Rackscale s.r.o., NetApp, Inc., VMWare, Inc., and Cisco Systems, Inc. End Users Covered: • Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI) • Retail and Ecommerce • Government • IT and Telecom • Media and Entertainment • Manufacturing and Logistics • Education • Healthcare and Life Sciences Regions Covered: • North America o US o Canada o Mexico • Europe o Germany o France o Italy o UK o Spain o Rest of Europe • Asia Pacific o Japan o China o India o Australia o New Zealand o Rest of Asia Pacific • Rest of the World o Middle East o Brazil o Argentina o South Africa o Egypt What our report offers: - Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments - Market share analysis of the top industry players - Strategic recommendations for the new entrants - Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets - Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations) - Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations - Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends - Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments - Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/826987-disaster-recovery-as-a-service-global-market-outlook-2016-2022
SunGard | Date: 2015-08-03
Systems and methods for real-time routing and retail order now adaptation to enhance execution performance can be configured to receive an order from a customer including a product identifier, order characteristics, and pricing information; identify a set of appropriate market venues based on the product identifier and/or order characteristics; determine expected behavior of the market venues based on historical data for executed orders and real-time order statistics; select, based upon expected behavior, a first market venue; and route the order, in real-time, to the first market venue for fulfillment.
SunGard | Date: 2015-09-17
Systems, devices, and methods for linking orders to develop a consolidated audit trail (CAT) are configured to receive event data for one or more orders based on one or more order characteristics; determine linkages between the one or more orders based on parent relationships of the one or more orders; verify the linkages between the one or more orders based on the event data; and determine order lifecycles based on the linkages between the one or more orders.
SunGard | Date: 2013-09-30
A system for tracing operations during application execution and executing the traced operations on a second processing unit. The tracing involves identifying attempts to execute software that performs particular functions that would benefit from execution on a particular piece of non-compatible hardware and, rather than executing the code, recording the requests and the data inputs to each of the requests. At a point during execution of the software system such as, for example, when either a memory threshold has been exceeded for recording the requested code and inputs, or results are needed for the requested code, the corresponding code executable on the non-compatible hardware is identified and executed. Thereafter, the results from the execution on the non-compatible hardware are received and processing continues.
SunGard | Date: 2012-11-15
A system for securities lending data management aggregates securities lending transaction data across a plurality of firms. The data comprises records including parameters for securities lending transactions entered into by individual firms. The system queries the data in order to identify instances wherein for a record of a transaction engaged by one firm, there is no corresponding record for another firm indicating a counterparty. The system compares instances of such orphan records in order to identify instances wherein the parameters for an orphan record corresponds to the parameters of another orphan record with the exception of perhaps one or two parameter values. The system outputs a listing of such instances and receives input confirming or invalidating that the identified orphan records correspond to the same transaction.
SunGard | Date: 2014-06-13
An authentication and payment system for paying a supplier via a network may include a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having program logic stored thereon having a code for an authentication and payment application executable by a processor of a computing device. The code may be programmed to perform a step of receiving a first set of specific data elements from a payer regarding an authorized purchase by the payer from the supplier. The code may be further programmed to receive a second set of specific data elements from the supplier. If the first set of specific data elements matches at least a portion of second set of specific data elements, the code may be programmed to generate and send a single-use number to the supplier. The single-use number may be usable as a credit card number for only one purchase.
SunGard | Date: 2012-11-08
In an embodiment, a method for operating a virtual data center includes interconnecting a hierarchy of networking devices comprising physical networking devices and virtual networking devices. Customer- facing access to resources in the virtual data center is provided via an overlay network using a suitable protocol that supports compatible addressing between service provider physical locations.
SunGard | Date: 2012-10-18
A system aggregates data that may be used during the course of a scheduled meeting and allows for the customization of the data for presentation during the scheduled meeting. The system communicates the customized data to meeting participants for discussion and review. The system also accepts inputs during the meeting that define additional meeting information such as bookmarked pages and views that were reviewed during the meeting. The inputs may further define notes reflecting discussions held during the meeting. The system stores information reflecting the bookmarks and notes that were made during the meeting. After the meeting has concluded, the data that was presented during the meeting as well as the bookmarks and notes that were presented during the meeting may be reviewed and selected for inclusion in an electronic document. The document may then be electronically communicated to the participants in the meeting for reference at a later time.