Sulzer Chemtech


Sulzer Chemtech

Time filter
Source Type

News Article | November 23, 2016

The report "Mist Eliminator Market by Type (Wire MESH, VANE, Fiber Bed), Material (Metal, Polypropylene, FRP), Application (Distillation Tower, Evaporator, Knockout Drum, Scrubber), End User, and Region - Global Forecast to 2026", published by MarketsandMarkets, the global market is projected to reach USD 1,152.4 Million by 2026, at a CAGR of 5.3% from 2016 to 2026. (Logo: ) Browse 90 market data Tables and 38 Figures spread through 133 Pages and in-depth TOC on "Mist Eliminator Market" Early buyers will receive 10% customization on this report. Several countries, including the U.K., the U.S., Germany, and India, among others, have started rewarding companies that have diligently followed emission norms throughout the year with tax exemption and other type of incentives. Considering the growing concerns regarding environmental protection, emission standards are expected to become more rigid over time, which is expected to drive the market for mist eliminator in the coming years. Desalination was the fastest-growing end user segment of the global mist eliminator market Based on end user, the mist eliminator market has been segmented into oil & gas, desalination, power generation, chemical, and others. The oil & gas segment accounted for the largest share of the mist eliminator market in 2015, however, the desalination segment is projected to be the fastest-growing segment from 2016 to 2021. Desalination of saline water is becoming essential to provide sustainable sources of fresh water for a wide range of industrial and residential applications. Wire mesh was the largest segment of the mist eliminator market Based on type, the Mist Eliminator Market has been segmented into the wire mesh, vane, fiber bed, and others. Wire mesh mist eliminators are the most common type of mist eliminators and are projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period.  Low cost of wire mesh and efficient removal of entrained liquid droplets from vapor or gas streams. The Asia-Pacific region was the largest market for the mist eliminator in 2015 Asia-Pacific was the largest market for mist eliminator in 2015, owing to the increase in demand for the mist eliminators in this region. The market growth in the Asia-Pacific region is driven by the stringent air emission standards to be followed by coal-based thermal power plants in China and India. The key players operational in the mist eliminator market include Sulzer Chemtech (Winterthur, Switzerland), FMC Technologies Inc. (Texas, U.S.), Munter AB (Stockholm, Sweden), Koch-Glitsch (Kansas, U.S.), Sullair LLC (New York, U.S.), Kimre Inc. (Miami, Florida), Air Quality Engineering, Inc. (Minneapolis, U.S.), MECS Inc. (Missouri, U.S.), AMACS (Texas, U.S.), and Hillard Corporation (New York, U.S.) among others. Browse Related Reports: Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems Market by Type (Wet FGD, Dry & Semi-Dry FGD), Application (Power Generation, Chemical, Iron & Steel, Cement Manufacturing, Others), Region (North America, Europe, APAC, Middle East & Africa, Latin America) - Global Forecast to 2021 MarketsandMarkets is the largest market research firm worldwide in terms of annually published premium market research reports. Serving 1700 global fortune enterprises with more than 1200 premium studies in a year, M&M is catering to a multitude of clients across 8 different industrial verticals. We specialize in consulting assignments and business research across high growth markets, cutting edge technologies and newer applications. Our 850 fulltime analyst and SMEs at MarketsandMarkets are tracking global high growth markets following the "Growth Engagement Model - GEM". The GEM aims at proactive collaboration with the clients to identify new opportunities, identify most important customers, write "Attack, avoid and defend" strategies, identify sources of incremental revenues for both the company and its competitors. M&M's flagship competitive intelligence and market research platform, "RT" connects over 200,000 markets and entire value chains for deeper understanding of the unmet insights along with market sizing and forecasts of niche markets. The new included chapters on Methodology and Benchmarking presented with high quality analytical infographics in our reports gives complete visibility of how the numbers have been arrived and defend the accuracy of the numbers. We at MarketsandMarkets are inspired to help our clients grow by providing apt business insight with our huge market intelligence repository. Visit MarketsandMarkets Blog @ Connect with us on LinkedIn @

Ervik A.,Norwegian University of Science and Technology | Ervik A.,Sintef | Bjorklund E.,Sulzer Chemtech
European Journal of Mechanics, B/Fluids | Year: 2017

The exact solution for a small falling drop is a classical result by Hadamard and Rybczynski. But experiments show that small drops fall slower than predicted, giving closer agreement with Stokes’ result for a falling hard sphere. Increasing the drop size, a transition between these two extremes is found. This is due to surfactants present in the system, and previous work has led to the stagnant-cap model. We present here an alternative approach which we call the continuous-interface model. In contrast to the stagnant-cap model, we do not consider a surfactant advection–diffusionequation at the interface. Taking instead the normal and tangential interfacial stresses into account, we solve the Stokes equation analytically for the falling drop with varying interfacial tension. Some of the solutions thus obtained, e.g. the hovering drop, violate conservation of energy unless energy is provided directly to the interface. Considering the energy budget of the drop, we show that the terminal velocity is bounded by the Stokes and the Hadamard–Rybczynski results. The continuous-interface model is then obtained from the force balance for surfactants at the interface. The resulting expressions gives the transition between the two extremes, and also predicts that the critical radius, below which drops fall like hard spheres, is proportional to the interfacial surfactant concentration. By analysing experimental results from the literature, we confirm this prediction, thus providing strong arguments for the validity of the proposed model. © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS

Pilling M.,Sulzer Chemtech | Roza M.,Sulzer Chemtech | Wong S.M.,Sulzer Chemtech
Petroleum Technology Quarterly | Year: 2010

For a vacuum tower to operate effectively, the flash zone and the wash section must work together to provide the best possible feed quality. To properly design a vacuum column, engineers need to predict how much entrainment and associated contaminants will travel from the flash zone to the slop wax and HVGO draws. The flash zone serves to transition the high-velocity, two-phase feed from the transfer line into the vacuum column in a manner that separates the liquid and routes it to the bottom of the column, while delivering the vapor uniformly to the upper sections of the column. A discussion covers the optimization of flash zone and wash section design; de-entrainment vs. vapour distribution; an example, showing the performance of an industrial column with a less-than-optimum wash section design; entrainment from the flash zone; and number of stripping stages in the bottom of the column.

Yang Q.,Sulzer Chemtech | Mosca G.,Sulzer AG | Roza M.,Sulzer AG
Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering | Year: 2010

Though they look very different, UOP SimulFlow™, Koch-Glitsch Ultra-Frac™, Jaeger CoFlo™ and Shell ConSep™ trays fall into the same category of trays using inertial separation technology. However, flooding mechanisms and the trends of entrainment and efficiency are different due to their different working principles. This paper provides a detailed analysis of these trays using available information from literature and U.S. Patents. Efforts are also made to interpret the observations reported. In terms of tray efficiency, it is found that SimulFlow, UltraFrac and CoFlo trays are typical point efficiency devices due to a completely mixed liquid pool on the tray deck, while ConSep trays can take advantage of liquid concentration gradient on the tray deck, which makes this tray attractive among all ultra high capacity trays. © 2010 Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China (CIESC) and Chemical Industry Press (CIP).

Majumder K.,Royal Dutch Shell | Mosca G.,Sulzer Chemtech | Mahon K.,Refining NZ
Petroleum Technology Quarterly | Year: 2013

The main fractionator of the crude distillation unit (CDU-1) in the Whangarei refinery of The New Zealand Refining Co (NZRC) was retrofitted with high-capacity internals to increase the unit throughput. Shell Global Solutions International carried out the feasibility study for the expansion of CDU-1. Several options were studied to debottleneck the main fractionators. On the basis of a comparison of the revamp options, NZRC decided to proceed with the ConSep tray alternative due to this option?s lowest capex and most favorable economics. The performance of Shell ConSep trays in the HGO pumparound section of the CDU-1 main fractionators is discussed.

Pilling M.,Sulzer Chemtech | Summers D.R.,Sulzer Chemtech
Chemical Engineering Progress | Year: 2012

The optimization of distillation equipment and processes using smart design to improve both the profitability and the greenness of an operation is presented. Smart column design is a function of understanding the process requirements and then using good process design. Green designs are smart, cost-effective solutions. The three stages of the distillation column design are described, i.e., construction materials, and resources; process design and configuration, and internal design optimization.

Mosca G.,Sulzer Chemtech | Tacchini E.,Sulzer Chemtech
10AIChE - 2010 AIChE Spring Meeting and 6th Global Congress on Process Safety | Year: 2010

The Propylene-Propane (PP) Splitter is the most critical tower among the distillation columns of an ethylene plant. This is even more true in many Russian steam crackers where the PP-Splitters were equipped with "non conventional fractionation trays", providing with poor performances. Thus, the recovery of Propylene was much lower than commonly achieved in modern Plants. A discussion covers a case study illustrating the revamp of the PP-Splitter with the most updated mass transfer technology allowed for a significant boosting of the Propylene recovery; and the revamp approach, including process simulation, selection of the most appropriate fractionation trays, job implementation at site, and the achieved results. This is an abstract of a paper presented at the 2010 Spring National Meeting (San Antonio, TX, 3/21-25/2010).

Agency: GTR | Branch: EPSRC | Program: | Phase: Research Grant | Award Amount: 2.46M | Year: 2012

The Gas-FACTS programme will provide important underpinning research for UK CCS development and deployment on natural gas power plants, particularly for gas turbine modifications and advanced post combustion capture technologies that are the principal candidates for deployment in a possible tens-of-£billions expansion of the CCS sector between 2020 and 2030, and then operation until 2050 or beyond, in order to meet UK CO2 (carbon dioxide) emission targets. Gas CCS R&D is an emerging field and many of the concepts and underlying scientific principles are still being invented. But on-going UK infrastructure investments and energy policy decisions are being made which would benefit from better information on relevant gas CCS technologies, making independent, fundamental studies by academic researchers a high priority. In addition, the results of this project will provide an essential basis for further work to extract the maximum research benefits from the UK CCS demonstration programme and help to develop more advanced gas CCS technologies for a second tranche of CCS deployment. The programme will also develop rigorous assessment methods and a framework to maximise pathways to impact that could support other RCUK research activities on gas CCS. Globally, there is already interest in gas CCS in Norway, California and the Middle East, and this is likely to become more widespread if cheaper gas leads to more widespread use. This work will be undertaken through work packages with the following aims: WP1: To quantify the scope of gas turbine modifications to improve the technical, environmental and economic performance of integrated CO2 capture on CCGT plants. Small gas turbines will be modified to run with steam or recycled flue gas replacing some of the normal air feed to increase back-end CO2 concentrations (which will help make the CO2 easier to capture). WP2: To quantify through modelling and experimental testing the scope for improving post-combustion capure system performance on CCGT plants through a combination of advanced liquid solvents, including novel amine mixtures, and improved transient performance. Solvents that are used to take up CO2 and then release it in a pure form that can be stored underground will be modified so that the amount of energy required to do this is reduced. The equipment the solvents are used in will also be designed to turn on and off quickly to allow CCS power plants to compensate for fluctuations in output from wind turbines. WP3: In close collaboration with an external Experts Group to undertake integration and whole systems performance assessments. This will include a Gas-FACTS Impact Handbook combining impact tables with state-of-the-art surveys to ensure that pathways to impact pursued by Gas-FACTS researchers are co-ordinated with other significant activities, including excellent science and stakeholder plans, to maximise their effectiveness. Gas-FACTS results will be implemented in the freely-available IECM package for access by any potential users. WP4: Impact delivery and expert interaction activities will be based on establishing an Experts Group including representatives of the UK CCS academic community, global academic community, UK policymakers, UK Regulators, NGOs, power utilities, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises). WP4 will also run a programme of engagement activities to impact, including project meetings, specialist meetings on topical issues and results, web-based dissemination and document publication (reports, responses to Parliamentary inquiries, journal papers, articles etc.)

This report studies Demister in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Sulzer Chemtech FMC Technologies Inc. Sullair, LLC Munters AB Koch-Glitsch Kimre, Inc. Air Quality Engineering, Inc. MECS, Inc. AMACS Hillard Corporation View Full Report With Complete TOC, List Of Figure and Table: Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Demister in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Demister in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Demister Market Research Report 2016 1 Demister Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Demister 1.2 Demister Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Demister by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Type I 1.2.3 Type II 1.2.4 Type III 1.3 Demister Segment by Application 1.3.1 Demister Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Application 1 1.3.3 Application 2 1.3.4 Application 3 1.4 Demister Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Demister (2011-2021) 7 Global Demister Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Sulzer Chemtech 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.1.3 Sulzer Chemtech Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 FMC Technologies Inc. 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.2.3 FMC Technologies Inc. Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Sullair, LLC 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.3.3 Sullair, LLC Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Munters AB 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.4.3 Munters AB Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Koch-Glitsch 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.5.3 Koch-Glitsch Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Kimre, Inc. 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.6.3 Kimre, Inc. Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Air Quality Engineering, Inc. 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.7.3 Air Quality Engineering, Inc. Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 MECS, Inc. 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.8.3 MECS, Inc. Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 AMACS 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.9.3 AMACS Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 Hillard Corporation 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Demister Product Type, Application and Specification Type I Type II 7.10.3 Hillard Corporation Demister Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview Global QYResearch ( ) is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.

Pilling M.W.,Sulzer Chemtech | Hirsch S.,Sulzer Chemtech
AIChE 2013 - 2013 AIChE Spring Meeting and 9th Global Congress on Process Safety, Conference Proceedings | Year: 2013

A discussion on Sulzer Chemtech's new umbrella floating valve, which improves the performances of the fractionation trays, covers the characteristics of this new feature; fields of application; and benefits in terms of column throughput, fractionation stages, and pressure drop. This is an abstract of a paper presented at the 2013 AIChE Spring Meeting & 9th Global Congress on Process Safety (San Antonio, TX 4/28-5/2/2013).

Loading Sulzer Chemtech collaborators
Loading Sulzer Chemtech collaborators