Wadsworth, TX, United States
Wadsworth, TX, United States

Time filter

Source Type

This report studies sales (consumption) of Global Nuclear Power market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering EDF Exelon Nuclear Rosenergoatom Duke Energy Entergy Corporation Tokyo Electric Power Co. FirstEnergy Kepco NextEra Energy Resources, LLC. Tennessee Valley Authority RWE Dominion Resources Southern Company Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd?NPCIL? Ontario Power Generation Pacific Gas & Electric Company STP Nuclear Operating Company Tohoku Electric Power Xcel Energy ENGIE Detroit Edison Company Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Kansai Electric Power Chubu Electric Power Chugoku Electric Power Con Edison Luminant Generation Company, LLC Ameren Corporate Portland General Electric ... Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Nuclear Power in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like USA China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Pressurised water reactor (PWR) Boiling water reactor (BWR) Pressurised heavy water reactor (PHWR) Gas-cooled reactor (AGR & Magnox) Light water graphite reactor (RBMK & EGP) Fast neutron reactor (FBR) Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Nuclear Power in each application, can be divided into Electricity Supply Others Application 3 Table of Contents Global Nuclear Power Sales Market Report 2016 1 Nuclear Power Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Nuclear Power 1.2 Classification of Nuclear Power 1.2.1 Pressurised water reactor (PWR) 1.2.2 Boiling water reactor (BWR) 1.2.3 Pressurised heavy water reactor (PHWR) 1.2.4 Gas-cooled reactor (AGR & Magnox) 1.2.5 Light water graphite reactor (RBMK & EGP) 1.2.6 Fast neutron reactor (FBR) 7 Global Nuclear Power Manufacturers Analysis 9.1 EDF 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Nuclear Power Product Type, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Type I 9.1.2.2 Type II 9.1.3 EDF Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Exelon Nuclear 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 125 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Type I 9.2.2.2 Type II 9.2.3 Exelon Nuclear Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 Rosenergoatom 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 148 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Type I 9.3.2.2 Type II 9.3.3 Rosenergoatom Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 Duke Energy 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Oct Product Type, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Type I 9.4.2.2 Type II 9.4.3 Duke Energy Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Entergy Corporation 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Type I 9.5.2.2 Type II 9.5.3 Entergy Corporation Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Tokyo Electric Power Co. 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 Type I 9.6.2.2 Type II 9.6.3 Tokyo Electric Power Co. Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 FirstEnergy 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Energy Product Type, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 Type I 9.7.2.2 Type II 9.7.3 FirstEnergy Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Kepco 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 Type I 9.8.2.2 Type II 9.8.3 Kepco Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 NextEra Energy Resources, LLC. 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.9.2.1 Type I 9.9.2.2 Type II 9.9.3 NextEra Energy Resources, LLC. Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Tennessee Valley Authority 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.10.2.1 Type I 9.10.2.2 Type II 9.10.3 Tennessee Valley Authority Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.11 RWE 9.12 Dominion Resources 9.13 Southern Company 9.14 Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd?NPCIL? 9.15 Ontario Power Generation 9.16 Pacific Gas & Electric Company 9.17 STP Nuclear Operating Company 9.18 Tohoku Electric Power 9.19 Xcel Energy 9.20 ENGIE 9.21 Detroit Edison Company 9.22 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 9.23 Kansai Electric Power 9.24 Chubu Electric Power 9.25 Chugoku Electric Power 9.26 Con Edison 9.27 Luminant Generation Company, LLC 9.28 Ameren Corporate 9.29 Portland General Electric ... Global QYResearch (http://globalqyresearch.com/ ) is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.


Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Nuclear Power -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database This report studies sales (consumption) of Nuclear Power in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering EDF Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Nuclear Power in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like USA China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Pressurised water reactor (PWR) Boiling water reactor (BWR) Pressurised heavy water reactor (PHWR) Gas-cooled reactor (AGR & Magnox) Light water graphite reactor (RBMK & EGP) Fast neutron reactor (FBR) Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Nuclear Power in each application, can be divided into Electricity Supply Others Application 3 Global Nuclear Power Sales Market Report 2016 1 Nuclear Power Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Nuclear Power 1.2 Classification of Nuclear Power 1.2.1 Pressurised water reactor (PWR) 1.2.2 Boiling water reactor (BWR) 1.2.3 Pressurised heavy water reactor (PHWR) 1.2.4 Gas-cooled reactor (AGR & Magnox) 1.2.5 Light water graphite reactor (RBMK & EGP) 1.2.6 Fast neutron reactor (FBR) 1.3 Application of Nuclear Power 1.3.1 Electricity Supply 1.3.2 Others 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Nuclear Power Market by Regions 1.4.1 USA Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Nuclear Power (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Nuclear Power Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Nuclear Power Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 7 Global Nuclear Power Manufacturers Analysis 9.1 EDF 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Nuclear Power Product Type, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Type I 9.1.2.2 Type II 9.1.3 EDF Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Exelon Nuclear 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 125 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Type I 9.2.2.2 Type II 9.2.3 Exelon Nuclear Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 Rosenergoatom 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 148 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Type I 9.3.2.2 Type II 9.3.3 Rosenergoatom Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 Duke Energy 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Oct Product Type, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Type I 9.4.2.2 Type II 9.4.3 Duke Energy Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Entergy Corporation 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Type I 9.5.2.2 Type II 9.5.3 Entergy Corporation Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Tokyo Electric Power Co. 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 Type I 9.6.2.2 Type II 9.6.3 Tokyo Electric Power Co. Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 FirstEnergy 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Energy Product Type, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 Type I 9.7.2.2 Type II 9.7.3 FirstEnergy Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Kepco 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 Type I 9.8.2.2 Type II 9.8.3 Kepco Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 NextEra Energy Resources, LLC. 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.9.2.1 Type I 9.9.2.2 Type II 9.9.3 NextEra Energy Resources, LLC. Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Tennessee Valley Authority 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.10.2.1 Type I 9.10.2.2 Type II 9.10.3 Tennessee Valley Authority Nuclear Power Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.11 RWE 9.12 Dominion Resources 9.13 Southern Company 9.14 Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd?NPCIL? 9.15 Ontario Power Generation 9.16 Pacific Gas & Electric Company 9.17 STP Nuclear Operating Company 9.18 Tohoku Electric Power 9.19 Xcel Energy 9.20 ENGIE 9.21 Detroit Edison Company 9.22 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 9.23 Kansai Electric Power 9.24 Chubu Electric Power 9.25 Chugoku Electric Power 9.26 Con Edison 9.27 Luminant Generation Company, LLC 9.28 Ameren Corporate 9.29 Portland General Electric ...


Rodgers S.,STP Nuclear Operating Company | Betancourt C.,STP Nuclear Operating Company | Kee E.,STP Nuclear Operating Company | Yilmaz F.,STP Nuclear Operating Company | Nelson P.,Texas A&M University
International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Proceedings, ICONE | Year: 2010

The solution to a Markov chain modeling electric power supply to critical equipment in a typical 4-loop pressurized water reactor following a Loss of offsite power event is compared with a convolution method. The standard "convolution integral" approach is described, and an alternative methodology based on a Markov model is illustrated. Copyright © 2010 by ASME.


Zheng G.,Harbin Engineering University | Nelson P.,Texas A&M University | Moiseytseva V.,Texas A&M University | Kee E.,STP Nuclear Operating Company | Yilmaz F.,STP Nuclear Operating Company
International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Proceedings, ICONE | Year: 2014

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is mandated to ensure "adequate protection" to the public health and safety, regardless of cost. It also has steadfastly declined to specify precisely what constitutes "adequate protection," except that it does not mean "zero risk." Rather it judges on a case-bycase basis whether the "adequate protection" standard has been met. NRC also seems to reserve the right to require an even higher level of protection, when that can be achieved in a manner that it judges to meet similarly imprecisely specified criteria such as "practicality" and "reasonableness." In Regulatory Guide 1.174 NRC comes close to a concrete specification of "adequate protection," albeit one that depends upon the historical licensing basis for a specific plant. And the technical portion of this paper begins with a description of how the approach of Regulatory Guide 1.174 can be viewed from the perspective of Risk-Informed Safety Margin Characterization. Meanwhile, in this research, in order to better understand the role of regulation, a microeconomic model of a price-taking nuclear power plant is constructed, particularly of the cost (C) of achieving any specified level of core damage frequency (CDF). Solution of this model reveals an economic optimum, at a point that balances plant value against risk of losing the plant via an accident involving core damage. For CDFs slightly smaller than this economic optimum there is scope for a regulatory mandate of even smaller CDF, should that be deemed either necessary to attain "adequate protection," or reasonably attainable in order to achieve greater than adequate protection of the public health and safety. It is argued that regulatory bodies must have scope for discretionary decisions, because the information necessary to formulate a reasonable approximation to the cost curve C (fortunately) does not exist. Copyright © 2014 by ASME.


Fleming K.N.,KNF Consulting Services LLC | Lydell B.O.Y.,Scandpower Risk Management | Grantom C.R.,STP Nuclear Operating Company
International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Proceedings, ICONE | Year: 2012

This paper summarizes the analysis of loss of coolant accident (LOCA) frequencies in support of a risk-informed (Ri) evaluation of Generic Safety issue (GSi) 191 for the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STPEGS) Units 1 and 2. The STP Ri-GSi 191 Closure Study investigates the size and location of loss of coolant accidents (LOCAs) more finely than in traditional PRAs in order to assess the risk of debris formation during the LOCAs that could interfere with the operation of the emergency core cooling systems (ECCSs) or inhibit coolant flow through the core during the recirculation phase after a LOCA. The size and location of the break could influence the amount and chemistry of debris formation and the timing and need for actions to initiate or terminate containment sprays and recirculation cooling. This application requires the capability to estimate LOCA frequencies as a function of break size at each location within the Class 1 pressure boundary with due regard to the proper characterization and quantification of uncertainties. Copyright © 2012 by ASME.


Liming J.K.,ABSG Consulting | Grantom C.R.,STP Nuclear Operating Company
International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis 2013, PSA 2013 | Year: 2013

This paper summarizes recent lessons learned regarding risk-informed surveillance frequency control program (RI-SFCP) implementation at commercial nuclear power stations. Since 2008, the authors of this paper have played significant roles in implementing industry initiative 5b RI-SFCPs for 20 nuclear power generating units operated by eight nuclear power utility companies. These programs include development, review, and implementation of surveillance test risk-informed documented evaluation (STRIDE) packages designed to support extension of conventional surveillance requirement test intervals, in accordance with "Risk-Informed Technical Specifications Initiative 5b, Risk-Informed Method for Control of Surveillance Frequencies, Industry Guideline" (NEI 04-10, Revision 1). The scope of work associated with STRIDE development and implementation, which the authors have supported, includes probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) case studies, deterministic assessment (DA), and, where required, instrument drift evaluation (IDE). The STRIDE implementation efforts have also included support of independent decision-making panel (IDP) meetings at the implementing power stations. The purpose of this paper is to provide a presentation of lessons learned during the considerable STRIDE development and implementation experience of the authors, which includes support for the development and implementation of over 80 plant STRIDEs. The major focus of the paper is lessons learned associated with STRIDE PRA case study development and implementation, but also includes insights about associated STRIDE DA and IDE development and implementation. The scope of the discussion in this paper includes treatment of conventional deterministic safety criteria as well as probabilistic risk criteria. The paper addresses both qualitative and quantitative aspects relating to STRIDE implementation.


Liming J.K.,ABSG Consulting | Johnson D.H.,ABSG Consulting | Grantom C.R.,STP Nuclear Operating Company
International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis 2011, PSA 2011 | Year: 2011

This paper summarizes a refreshed perspective on a proposed integrated risk-informed performance-based regulatory framework via the application of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). This perspective is refreshed, in that it is based on the considerable industry experience gained during the last decade in the implementation of important risk-informed applications (e.g., risk-managed technical specifications (RMTS), risk-informed surveillance frequency control programs (RI-SFCPs), risk-informed in-service testing programs (RI-IST), risk-informed in-service inspection (RI-ISI) programs, risk-informed graded quality assurance (RI-GQA) programs, etc.) and in the area of PSA standards development and implementation. The focus of this paper is to provide an integrated framework of proposed practical safety management metrics that can be effectively and efficiently applied in the regulation of commercial nuclear power plant design, construction, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning. The scope of the discussion in this paper includes treatment of conventional deterministic safety criteria as well as probabilistic risk criteria. The paper addresses both qualitative and quantitative aspects relating to this proposed regulatory framework.


Liming J.K.,ABSG Consulting | Mikschl T.J.,ABSG Consulting | Rodgers S.S.,STP Nuclear Operating Company
International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis 2011, PSA 2011 | Year: 2011

This paper summarizes the results of an evaluation of human action dependency for the STP Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STPEGS) Units 1 and 2 low power and shutdown (LPSD) probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). Specifically, this paper focuses on the potential impact of refinements to current industry PRA human reliability analysis (HRA) methods (e.g., the EPRI HRA Calculator® methods) for human action dependency evaluation. These potential refinements were conceptualized during the performance of the STPNOC LPSD PRA HRA. The scope of this evaluation included a thorough post-processing evaluation of over 37,000 PRA event sequences (or cut sets) for combinations of human failure events (HFEs) that could result in potential HEP interdependence, and thus, could significantly impact the results of the PRA and any associated risk-informed applications. The paper presents a discussion of the importance of human action dependency analysis (HADA) in PRA or probabilistic safety assessment (PSA), and presents an overview of current methods typically applied. The paper also presents general results from the STPNOC LPSD PRA HRA HADA, and it provides selected examples of how potential HADA refinements could impact the rigor and accuracy of HADA results, and thus, overall PRA or PSA results.


Fleming K.N.,KNF Consulting Services LLC | Lydell B.O.Y.,Scandpower Risk Management Inc. | Rick Grantom C.,STP Nuclear Operating Company
11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012 | Year: 2012

This paper summarizes the analysis of loss of coolant accident (LOCA) frequencies in support of a risk-informed (RI) evaluation of Generic Safety Issue (GSI) 191 for the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STPEGS) Units 1 and 2. The STP RI-GSI 191 Closure study investigates the size and location of loss of coolant accidents (LOCAs) more finely than in traditional PRAs in order to assess the risk of debris formation during the LOCAs that could interfere with the operation of the emergency core cooling systems (ECCSs) during the recirculation phase after a breach in the reactor coolant system pressure boundary. The specific capabilities that have been demonstrated include the capability to estimate LOCA frequencies as a function of break size at each of 760 locations and the capability to utilize information from NUREG-1829 to characterize epistemic uncertainty associated with LOCA frequencies. A method that incorporates via Bayes' uncertainty analysis the service data on pipe failures and component exposures was used to incorporate a quantification of epistemic uncertainties associated with estimating the input parameters in the model equations, including both parametric and modeling sources of uncertainty. The analysis demonstrates the capability to quantify the impacts of information on degradation mechanism susceptibility at each location, based on insights from service data and results of RI-ISI evaluation.


Kocher J.A.,Conco Services Corporation | Frazee R.,STP Nuclear Operating Company | Wolf M.,2800 Louis Lumiere
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Power Division (Publication) POWER | Year: 2014

Eddy Current Testing (ECT) of condenser tubes is essential to maintaining good plant reliability and availability. Early identification of defects can allow for adequate remedial action and prevent forced outages caused by condenser tube leaks. The well-known catastrophic failure in the nuclear industry in Japan has not only raised concern in Japan over aging nuclear power plants, but has also raised concern over safe operations in the United States and around the world. Ongoing reliability and instability issues due to reported leaks in condensers have also been the topic for nuclear watchdogs. This focus on the nuclear plant condenser has brought to light the various levels of sophistication and capability in ECT. In ECT, the type of defect present in a condenser tube is determined by the characteristics it presents under test. The tubes must be adequately cleaned prior to testing and some awareness or evidence of the type of defect to be uncovered should be available to the testing team. In cases where defects are discovered that are inconsistent with prior awareness further exploratory testing is common. Exploratory testing can proceed to test areas of suspected defects in the tubing, and it may result in a complete redefinition of the test procedure, inclusive of instruments, probe types and other key ECT criteria. A comprehensive knowledge of testing options and their practical application is necessary to redefine a test that will yield meaningful results and achieve the intended objective; to identify the type and extent of defect and take remedial action therefore preventing failure. This paper addresses such a case at the South Texas Project (STP) Nuclear Power Plant where peculiar defects were undeterminable under standard ECT procedures. The defects continued to negatively impact reliability and stability at the plant until a new ECT process and test procedure were developed, demonstrated and deployed. The result achieved was accurate defect detectability and improved nuclear plant reliability. Copyright © 2014 by ASME.

Loading STP Nuclear Operating Company collaborators
Loading STP Nuclear Operating Company collaborators