Entity

Time filter

Source Type


Neill A.,Park University | Cronin J.J.,National Childrens Research Center | Brannigan D.,Royal Hobart Hospital | O'Sullivan R.,Paediatric Emergency Research Unit PERU | Cadogan M.,Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital
Emergency Medicine Journal | Year: 2014

Objective: To report on the presence and use of social media by speakers and attendees at the International Conference on Emergency Medicine (ICEM) 2012, and describe the increasing use of online technologies such as Twitter and podcasts in publicising conferences and sharing research findings, and for clinical teaching. Methods: Speakers were identified through the organising committee and a database constructed using the internet to determine the presence and activity of speakers on social media platforms. We also examined the use of Twitter by attendees and non-attendees using an online archiving system. Researchers tracked and reviewed every tweet produced with the hashtag #ICEM2012. Tweets were then reviewed and classified by three separate authors into different categories. Results: Of the 212 speakers at ICEM 2012, 41.5% had a LinkedIn account and 15.6% were on Twitter. Less than 1% were active on Google+ and less than 10% had an active website or blog. There were over 4500 tweets about ICEM 2012. Over 400 people produced tweets about the conference, yet only 34% were physically present at the conference. Of the original tweets produced, 74.4% were directly related to the clinical and research material of the conference. Conclusions: ICEM 2012 was the most tweeted emergency medicine conference on record. Tweeting by participants was common; a large number of original tweets regarding clinical material at the conference were produced. There was also a large virtual participation in the conference as multiple people not attending the conference discussed the material on Twitter. Source


Howe W.,Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital | Davis E.,Institute of Child Health Research UWA | Valentine J.,Princess Margaret Hospital
Developmental Neurorehabilitation | Year: 2010

Objective: To investigate if intravenous pamidronate improves bone density in a cohort of patients with chronic neurological conditions and low bone density, in whom fractures and bone pain are impacting on care. Methods: Fourteen participants (M:F = 7:7, average age 12.4 years) were enrolled in a prospective uncontrolled study in which pamidronate was infused every 68 weeks over a 2 year period, the average dose received was 12.5 mg kg-1. Results: Bone mineral density z-score improved at all sites measured over the 2 years; whole body -4.84 to -3.14 (p = 0.01), lumbar spine -2.92 to -1.1 (p = 0.02) and femoral neck -4.6 to -3.58 (p = 0.04). Of the eight patients with pain at baseline, seven reported decreased pain after 12 months of pamidronate. Of the 11 patients who answered the general wellbeing part of the questionnaire, eight patients reported an improvement in general wellbeing and three reported no change. There was a downward trend in the average annualized fracture rate from 0.42 to 0.14 fractures per year (p = 0.09). Conclusion: Pamidronate improves bone density and reduces pain in children and adolescents with chronic neurological conditions. © 2010 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved. Source


Ananda S.,Royal Melbourne Hospital | Nowak A.K.,Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital | Nowak A.K.,University of Western Australia | Dowling A.,St. Vincents Hospital | And 4 more authors.
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | Year: 2011

Concurrent and post-radiotherapy temozolomide (T) significantly improves survival in patient with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. We aimed to assess the activity of the combination of T and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in this population. A combination of T (days 1-5, 200 mg/m 2 orally) and PLD (day 1, 40 mg/m 2 intravenous) was given every 4 weeks for six cycles following chemo-radiotherapy as a post-operative treatment. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (6PFS). Of the 40 patients who enrolled (53 years median age, 73% male), the 6PFS was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-72%). The median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.6-8.0 months) and overall survival (OS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.7-15.8 months). Thirty-four patients had measurable disease: one had a complete response (3%), 28 had stable disease (82%), and five had progressive disease (15%). Treatment was well tolerated: hematological toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia (8%). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity included nausea and vomiting (8%) and palmar-plantar toxicity (5%). We concluded that combination T and PLD is well tolerated but does not add significant clinical benefit regarding 6PFS and OS. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Source


Byron Y.,University of Tasmania | West H.,University of Tasmania | Wood B.,Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital | Murray L.,University of Tasmania | Cooling N.,University of Tasmania
Global Health Promotion | Year: 2015

Introduction: This commentary describes a student-led project that distributed long-lasting insecticide-treated nets in Masaka, Uganda. The role of student-led initiatives in global health promotion projects is also discussed. Methods: A survey of 213 net recipients was conducted after a 12-month period to evaluate malaria prevention knowledge, and net use and maintenance. Results: Only 4.7% of recipients could not recall any malaria prevention methods. Seventy percent of pregnant women and 86.5% of children under five slept under a net the previous night. Only two households (0.9%) no longer possessed a net, and nets were not used in 2.3% of houses. Household observation revealed 17.4% of nets had at least one problem that would compromise effectiveness. Conclusions: Student-led projects can play an important role in effectively preventing malaria. However coordination with existing programs, targeting hard-to-access groups, and training of students overcomes some common limitations of such student-led initiatives. © 2014, © The Author(s) 2014. Source


Ngune I.,Edith Cowan University | Jiwa M.,University of Notre Dame | McManus A.,Curtin University Australia | Parsons R.,Curtin University Australia | And 2 more authors.
Journal of Medical Internet Research | Year: 2015

Background: Patients who have been treated for colorectal cancer in Australia can consult their general practitioner (GP) for advice about symptoms or side effects at any time following their treatment. However, there is no evidence that such patients are consistently advised by GPs, and patients experience substantial unmet need for reassurance and advice. Objective: To explore the patient management options selected by GPs to treat a set of patients describing their symptoms following treatment for colorectal cancer. Methods: This was an Internet-based survey. Participants (GPs) viewed 6 video vignettes of actors representing patients who had been treated for colorectal cancer. The actor-patients presented problems that resulted from their treatment. Participants indicated their diagnosis and stated if they would prescribe, refer, or order tests, based on that diagnosis. These responses were then rated against the management decisions for those vignettes as recommended by a team of colorectal cancer experts. Results: In total, 52 GPs consented to take part in the study, and 40 (77%) completed the study. Most GPs made a diagnosis of colorectal cancer treatment side effects/symptoms of recurrence that was consistent with the experts' opinions. However, correct diagnosis was dependent on the type of case viewed. Compared with radiation proctitis, GPs were more likely to recognize peripheral neuropathy (odds ratio, OR, 4.43, 95% CI 1.41-13.96, P=.011) and erectile dysfunction (OR 9.70, 95% CI 2.48-38.03, P=.001), but less likely to identify chemotherapy-induced fatigue (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.44). GPs who had more hours of direct patient care (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.84, P=.02), were experienced (OR 9.78, 95% CI 1.18-8.84, P=.02), and consulted more patients per week (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.16-5.30, P=.02) suggested a management plan that was consistent with the expert opinion. Conclusions: In this pilot study, years of experience and direct patient contact hours had a significant and positive impact on the management of patients. This study also showed promising results indicating that management of the common side effects of colorectal cancer treatment can be delegated to general practice. Such an intervention could support the application of shared models of care. However, a larger study, including the management of side effects in real patients, needs to be conducted before this can be safely recommended. Source

Discover hidden collaborations