Beijing, China
Beijing, China

China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation , or Sinopec Limited , is a Chinese oil and gas company based in Beijing, China. It is listed in Hong Kong and also trades in Shanghai and New York. Sinopec is the world's fifth biggest company by revenue and its second biggest chemical producer.Sinopec Limited's parent, Sinopec Group, is one of the major State Owned petroleum energy and chemicals companies in China, headquartered in Chaoyang District, Beijing. Sinopec's business includes oil and gas exploration, refining, and marketing; production and sales of petrochemicals, chemical fibers, chemical fertilizers, and other chemical products; storage and pipeline transportation of crude oil and natural gas; import, export and import/export agency business of crude oil, natural gas, refined oil products, petrochemicals, and other chemicals. In 2011 it ranked as the 5th largest company in sales in Forbes Global 2000. In 2009, it was ranked 9th by Fortune Global 500 becoming the first Chinese corporation to make the top ten and in 2010 it was ranked 7th. In 2007, it ranked first in the Top 500 Enterprises of China ranking. Wikipedia.


Time filter

Source Type

The present invention discloses a catalyst component for propene polymerization, comprising titanium, magnesium, halogen, and internal electron donor A, wherein said internal electron donor A is selected from the compounds as shown in Formula I, in Formula I, R is selected from hydrogen, hydroxyl, and substituted or unsubstituted C_(1)-C_(30 )hydrocarbyl, preferably from hydrogen, hydroxyl, and substituted or unsubstituted C_(1)-C_(20 )alkyl, C_(6)-C_(30 )aryl, C_(6)-C_(30 )heteroaryl, C_(7)-C_(30 )alkylaryl and C_(7)-C_(30 )arylalkyl; R_(1 )and R_(2 )may be identical to or different from each other, and are selected from hydrogen and substituted or unsubstituted C_(1)-C_(30 )hydrocarbyl, preferably from hydrogen and substituted or unsubstituted C_(1)-C_(20 )alkyl, C_(6)-C_(30 )aryl, C_(7)-C_(30 )alkylaryl and C_(7)-C_(30 )arylalkyl. According to the present invention, by using the compound as shown in Formula I as internal electron donor compound for propene polymerization, the catalyst has a higher activity, and a slow rate of delay of activity. The obtained polymer has not only a wider molecular weight distribution, but also a high melt index and isotacticity.


Patent
Sinopec and China Petroteum & Chemical Corporation | Date: 2015-04-24

The present invention provides a catalyst component for olefin polymerization, obtained by a reaction of magnesium, titanium, halogen and an internal electron donor, the internal electron donor comprising an imine compound as shown in Formula Z. The present invention also provides a preparation method of the catalyst component, and a catalyst for olefin polymerization containing the same. When the catalyst of the present invention is used for olefin polymerization reaction, the catalyst has a high activity, and a slow rate of activity decay, and the obtained polymer has a high isotacticity index, and a wide molecular weight distribution.


The present invention relates to a hydrocracking catalyst, a process for preparing the same and use thereof The present catalyst comprises a cracking component and a hydrogenation component, wherein the cracking component comprises from 0 to 20 wt. % of a molecular sieve and from 20 wt. % to 60 wt. % of an amorphous silica-alumina, the hydrogenation component comprises at least one hydrogenation metal in a total amount of from 34 wt. % to 75 wt. % calculated by the mass of oxides, each amount is based on the total weight of the catalyst. The present catalyst is prepared by directly mixing an acidic component powder material with an impregnating solution, impregnating, filtering, drying, molding, and drying and calcining.


The present invention provides a preparation method of a catalyst component for olefin polymerization, comprising firstly dissolving an anhydrous magnesium halide into a mixed solvent which comprises an oxygen-containing organic titanium compound, an organic epoxy compound, a hydroxy-containing compound, and an inert solvent, and does not comprise a phosphate compound, so as to form a magnesium halide solution; then mixing the magnesium halide solution with a halogen-containing compound to precipitate a solid, so as to obtain the catalyst component, wherein the halogen-containing compound comprises at least one selected from a group consisting of halogen and titanium-containing compounds, halogenated organic hydrocarbon compounds, acyl halide compounds, halogen and phosphorus-containing compounds, halogen and boron-containing compounds, halogenated organic aluminium compounds, and halogen and silicon-containing compounds. The catalyst component prepared by the present invention has better particle morphology, and a good hydrogen response, and thus is favourable to use of the catalyst in a slurry or gas polymerization process device.


A magnesium halide solution is disclosed. The magnesium halide solution comprises a magnesium halide, an oxygen-containing organic titanium compound, a hydroxyl-containing compound, and an organic solvent. The magnesium halide solution further comprises an organic heterocyclic compound. The organic solvent is a hydrocarbon and/or a halogenated hydrocarbon. The organic heterocyclic compound is at least one selected from a group consisting of a sulphur-containing organic heterocyclic compound, a nitrogen-containing organic heterocyclic compound, and an organic epoxy compound. The magnesium halide solution has a good stability, and can be used for preparing a catalyst for olefin polymerization and copolymerization reactions. The raw material of the magnesium halide solution is cheap and easy to be obtained. The preparing method is easy to be performed and is environment-friendly.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2017-03-01

The present invention provides a catalyst component for olefin polymerization, obtained by a reaction of magnesium, titanium, halogen and an internal electron donor, the internal electron donor comprising an imine compound as shown in Formula Z. The present invention also provides a preparation method of the catalyst component, and a catalyst for olefin polymerization containing the same. When the catalyst of the present invention is used for olefin polymerization reaction, the catalyst has a high activity, and a slow rate of activity decay, and the obtained polymer has a high isotacticity index, and a wide molecular weight distribution.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2017-03-08

The present invention provides a preparation method of a catalyst component for olefin polymerization, comprising firstly dissolving an anhydrous magnesium halide into a mixed solvent which comprises an oxygen-containing organic titanium compound, an organic epoxy compound, a hydroxy-containing compound, and an inert solvent, and does not comprise a phosphate compound, so as to form a magnesium halide solution; then mixing the magnesium halide solution with a halogen-containing compound to precipitate a solid, so as to obtain the catalyst component, wherein the halogen-containing compound comprises at least one selected from a group consisting of halogen and titanium-containing compounds, halogenated organic hydrocarbon compounds, acyl halide compounds, halogen and phosphorus-containing compounds, halogen and boron-containing compounds, halogenated organic aluminium compounds, and halogen and silicon-containing compounds. The catalyst component prepared by the present invention has better particle morphology, and a good hydrogen response, and thus is favourable to use of the catalyst in a slurry or gas polymerization process device.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2017-03-01

The present invention discloses a catalyst component for propene polymerization, comprising titanium, magnesium, halogen, and internal electron donor A, wherein said internal electron donor A is selected from the compouns as shown in Formula I,_(1)-C_(30) hydrocarbyl, preferably from hydrogen, hydroxyl, and substituted or unsubstituted C_(1)-C_(20) alkyl, C_(6)-C_(30) aryl, C_(6)-C_(30) heteroaryl, C_(7)-C_(30) alkylaryl and C_(7)-C_(30) arylalkyl; R_(1) and R_(2) may be identical to or different from each other, and are selected from hydrogen and substituted or unsubstituted C_(1)-C_(30) hydrocarbyl, preferably from hydrogen and substituted or unsubstituted C_(1)-C_(20) alkyl, C_(6)-C_(30) aryl, C_(7)-C_(30) alkylaryl and C_(7)-C_(30) arylalkyl. According to the present invention, by using the compound as shown in Formula I as internal electron donor compound for propene polymerization, the catalyst has a higher activity, and a slow rate of delay of activity. The obtained polymer has not only a wider molecular weight distribution, but also a high melt index and isotacticity.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2017-03-08

A magnesium halide solution is disclosed. The magnesium halide solution comprises a magnesium halide, an oxygen-containing organic titanium compound, a hydroxyl-containing compound, and an organic solvent. The magnesium halide solution further comprises an organic heterocyclic compound. The organic solvent is a hydrocarbon and/or a halogenated hydrocarbon. The organic heterocyclic compound is at least one selected from a group consisting of a sulphur-containing organic heterocyclic compound, a nitrogen-containing organic heterocyclic compound, and an organic epoxy compound. The magnesium halide solution has a good stability, and can be used for preparing a catalyst for olefin polymerization and copolymerization reactions. The raw material of the magnesium halide solution is cheap and easy to be obtained. The preparing method is easy to be performed and is environment-friendly.


Patent
Sinopec | Date: 2017-01-11

Disclosed is a composite catalyst, comprising carbon in a continuous phase and Raney alloy particles in a dispersed phase. The Raney alloy particles are dispersed evenly or unevenly in the carbon in a continuous phase, and the carbon in a continuous phase is obtained by carbonizing at least one carbonizable organic substance. The catalyst has good particle strength, high catalytic activity, and good selectivity.


Ma A.-L.,Sinopec
Natural Gas Geoscience | Year: 2016

Diamondoids occur in all kinds of fuel fossils. Due to peculiar cage molecular structures, diamondoids have been widely used in the maturity assessment of high mature to over-mature oils and source rocks since the 1990s. New advancements in maturity, oil-cracking, oil mixing, oil biodegradation, organic facies, TSR, gas washing, migration, and oil spill identification using diamondoids during 21st century were discussed. The origin and possible forming mechanisms of diamondoids were summarized. Due to the unclearness of the origin of diamondoid, the results of the maturity and oil cracking among researchers have great differences. It is suggested that research of the evolution of diamondoid in different type oils and source rocks be beneficial to their application in organic geochemistry, especially for the depth limits for the deep reservoirs. © 2016, Science Press. All right reserved.


Gao J.,Wuhan University | He S.,Wuhan University | Zhao J.-X.,University of Queensland | Yi J.,Sinopec
Marine and Petroleum Geology | Year: 2017

The Wufeng-Longmaxi organic-rich shales host the largest shale gas fields of China. This study examines sealed fractures within core samples of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales in the Jiaoshiba shale gas field in order to understand the development of overpressures (in terms of magnitude, timing and burial) in Wufeng-Longmaxi shales and thus the causes of present-day overpressure in these Paleozoic shale formations as well as in all gas shales. Quartz and calcite fracture cements from the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale intervals in four wells at depth intervals between 2253.89 m and 3046.60 m were investigated, and the fluid composition, temperature, and pressure during natural fracture cementation determined using an integrated approach consisting of petrography, Raman spectroscopy and microthermometry. Many crystals in fracture cements were found to contain methane inclusions only, and aqueous two-phase inclusions were consistently observed alongside methane inclusions in all cement samples, indicating that fluid inclusions trapped during fracture cementation are saturated with a methane hydrocarbon fluid. Homogenization temperatures of methane-saturated aqueous inclusions provide trends in trapping temperatures that Th values concentrate in the range of 198.5 °C–229.9 °C, 196.2 °C-221.7 °C for quartz and calcite, respectively. Pore-fluid pressures of 91.8–139.4 MPa for methane inclusions, calculated using the Raman shift of C-H symmetric stretching (v1) band of methane and equations of state for supercritical methane, indicate fluid inclusions trapped at near-lithostatic pressures. High trapping temperature and overpressure conditions in fluid inclusions represent a state of temperature and overpressure of Wufeng-Longmaxi shales at maximum burial and the early stage of the Yanshanian uplift, which can provide a key evidence for understanding the formation and evolution of overpressure. Our results demonstrate that the main cause of present-day overpressure in shale gas deposits is actually the preservation of moderate-high overpressure developed as a result of gas generation at maximum burial depths. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd


Lan K.,Sinopec | Liu X.,Sinopec
Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Diqiu Kexue Ban)/Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition) | Year: 2017

The vibration of drillstring is a common problem while drilling. Serious vibration is one of the most important reasons leading to bit and drillstring failure, which can reduce drilling efficiency and increase cost. So how to identify and suppress drilling vibration is a vital task and many researches have been done about this. Through the review of theoretical study and latest progress of drillstring dynamics, summarization of laboratory test research, the latest development of vibration monitoring device and suppression tool are introduced in this paper. Main solution of the problem should include drillstring dynamics software on the basis of theoretical study and laboratory test, vibration monitoring device and proper vibration suppression tool. Meanwhile, the research of vibration suppression integrated technology is proposed. © 2017, Science Press. All right reserved.


Feng D.,China University of Geosciences | Feng D.,Sinopec
Arabian Journal of Geosciences | Year: 2017

Transtensional basins containing petroleum reserves are common in eastern China. To better understand the evolution of the oil reservoirs, we investigated the generation mechanism of the Huimin sag transtensional structure, eastern China. We analyzed three-dimensional seismic surveys and drill-core data and concluded that most faults in the Huimin sag are planar or listric with negative flower-structured vertical profiles. The main faults are ENE- and E-striking: the Linshang fault belt to the north and the Xiakou fault belt to the south. Seismic profiles indicate three sets of basement faults in the Huimin sag, striking NNE, ENE, and NNW. The NNW-striking basement faults originated in the middle Triassic; the ENE and NNE faults formed during the late Jurassic. During the Paleogene, the Huimin sag was subjected to N–S extensional forces that reactivated the ENE faults, leading to dextral strike-slip displacement in the Linshang and Xiakou faults, which were oblique to the extensional direction. This generated the conjugate brushed-shaped Linshang and Xiakou fault system, producing a typical oblique extensional basin with characteristic transtensional structure. To reconstruct the evolution of the transtensional structure in Huimin sag, we used Lagrangian analysis software to model the main faults in the western Huimin sag. The simulation verified the re-activation of the NE-, ENE-, and NNW-striking faults under the N–S extension. The NNW fault faded, while the other two strengthened, producing brush-shaped fault systems and E–W- and ENE-striking normal faults. The simulation results show good agreement with the field-data analysis. © 2017, Saudi Society for Geosciences.


Horizontal wells put into production in 2014 of Daniudi Gasfield show stable well productivity up to now, the law of productivity decline of these wells are apparently different from both wells in past years and wells in similar gas reservoirs. Causal analysis was carried out to study the stable production of horizontal wells put into production in 2014 of Daniudi Gasfield. Causes of the stable production were classified into geological reasons, engineering reasons and management reasons. Geological reasons include water production, length of sandstone in horizontal well and hydrocarbon-generating intensity. Engineering reasons refer mainly to design and construction of fracture and management reasons include the change of thought in drainage and proportion of production. Results show that water production is critical to the well production in tight gas reservoir, the lower the water production is, the easier the stable gas production will achieve. Bigger length of sandstone in horizontal well, higher hydrocarbon-generating intensity, bigger scale of fracturing and higher flow-back rate would also be advantageous to stable gas production. For high water saturation tight gas reservoir, top priority should be given to drainage. It is important to clear the development idea that "drainage and gas production are equally important and should be carried out simultaneously". Reduce the proportion of production under efficient drainage can reduce the pressure drop rate of formation and is in favor of stable gas production. It is also proposed that for tight gas reservoir, scientific management is the key to efficient development, "ow gas production + high water production≠productivity decline". Long-term stable production can also be achieved in high water saturation tight gas reservoir through deepened understanding of geological conditions, improvement of drilling/fracturing technology and optimization of development ideas. © 2017, Science Press. All right reserved.


Liu L.,China University of Petroleum - Beijing | Qiao J.,China University of Petroleum - Beijing | Shen B.,Sinopec | Lu X.,China University of Petroleum - Beijing | Yang Y.,China University of Petroleum - Beijing
Acta Geochimica | Year: 2017

Extant research on Paleozoic mudstone is well developed in the Tarim Basin, while the research on Carboniferous mudstone is relatively weak. Through systematic study of lithology, geochemical characteristics, reservoir characteristics and gas–bearing properties of Carboniferous mudstone in the Tarim Basin, this study aims to provide a geological basis for the Paleozoic shale gas exploration and development, favorable zone optimization, and resource potential evaluation in the Tarim Basin. The results show that the sedimentary environments of organic-rich mudstone in the study area were mainly basin facies and slope facies. Lithology is dominated by black carbonaceous mudstone, followed by calcareous mudstone, siliceous mudstone, and siliceous rocks. Mudstone is mainly developed in the Kalashayi Formation, which is located in the Bachu and Markit slope belt, with the cumulative thickness of 30–200 m. The organic carbon content is commonly more than 0.4%, and the organic matter types are type II and type III. Thermal evolution degree is widely distributed from a low mature to over mature stage, and different tectonic units have a greater difference. The contents of quartz plus feldspar are between 12% and 82.5%, with an average of 45.8%. The content distribution of clay mineral is from 12% to 57%, with an average of 38.2%. Carbonate minerals (mainly siderite) content is below 50%. The brittle mineral content of the mudstone is approximately 65%, with a strong compressibility, and the mudstone has the material basis of forming crack and natural fracture. Microscopic pores in micro–nanometer level are well developed in the mudstone, including micro bedding joint, microcrack, interbedded pores of clay mineral, nanoscale intragranular or edge pores in the massive organic matter, bioclastic micropores, and mineral dissolution pores, etc. According to the standards provided by the Ministry of Land and Resources in China, the Kalashayi Formation in Bamai Area is a favorable area for shale gas development. © 2017 Science Press, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg


Lai F.,China University of Geosciences | Li Z.,China University of Geosciences | Hu X.,Sinopec
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering | Year: 2017

Carbon dioxide (CO2) flooding is an effective method of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) that has become one of the most important EOR processes. One of the key factors in the design of a CO2 injection project is the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), whereas local sweeping efficiency during gas injection is dependent on the MMP. There are many empirical correlation analyses for the MMP calculation. However, these analyses focus on the molecular weight of the C5+ or C7+ fraction, and do not emphasize the effects of various components on MMP. Our study aims to develop an improved CO2-oil MMP correlation analysis that includes parameters such as reservoir temperature and various oil mole fractions. Here, correlation analysis was performed to define the influence of various components on the MMP using various data from 45 oilfields which have experimental CO2-oil MMP and oil compositions readily available. Thirty of the data sets were used to develop an improved correlation, and the other 15 data sets were used to verify the correlation. It was found that the mole fraction of C3 and C6 were the main factors that affected MMP. There was a good quadratic polynomial relationship between the mole fraction of C3 and MMP, and the relationship also existed between the mole fraction of C6 and MMP. The results do not include the molecular weight of the C5+ or C7+ fraction like other common correlations. Nine popular correlations were then used to also predict the MMP, and the comparison showed that the improved CO2-oil MMP correlation defined here was a better estimate. The correlation was then used in Dongshisi and Fuyu oilfields to assess EOR potential, the results also indicated that MMP increased over the course of the CO2 flooding process. This increase shows that it would be more difficult to achieve a mixed phase between crude oil and CO2, therefore the oil recovery would be difficult to further improve towards the end of injection. © 2017 Sinopec Geophysical Research Institute.


Li D.-R.,Sinopec
Shenyang Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shenyang University of Technology | Year: 2017

In order to solve the problem that the eccentricity of tubular permanent magnet linear synchronous motor (TPMLSM) leads to huge unilateral magnetic force and thus the friction between the stator and mover reaches as high as several thousands N, the model for TPMLSM was established, and the structure characteristics of TPMLSM and the cause of unilateral magnetic force in the TPMLSM were analyzed. In addition, the air gap magnetic field under the eccentric condition of TPMLSM was analyzed with the magnetic circuit method. With the Maxwell tensor theorem, the relationship between the structure parameters, eccentric parameters and unilateral magnetic force of TPMLSM under no-load condition was deduced, and the unilateral magnetic force was calculated with the deduced results. The results show that the proposed analytical method has a certain correctness and accuracy. © 2017, Editorial Department of Journal of Shenyang University of Technology. All right reserved.


Wang L.,Sinopec | Cao H.-H.,Sinopec
Natural Gas Geoscience | Year: 2016

Organic pores structures and their possible evolution mechanisms were analyzed by Ar-ion milling/scanning electron microscope after thermal simulation experiment. Several kinds of organic pores including girdle pores, circular pores and spongy pores appeared during the thermal simulation process. This result shows that there are several different mechanisms in organic pores evolution. Girdle pore is a typical pore structure in particular period of hydrocarbons generation, and the girdle structure is organic matter-mineral complex where the hydrocarbons generate. It is also the first time to observe the organic matter-mineral complex. © 2016, Science Press. All right reserved.


Wei X.-F.,Sinopec | Guo T.-L.,Sinopec | Liu R.-B.,Sinopec
Natural Gas Geoscience | Year: 2016

Taking natural gas from marine strata of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in Jiaoshiba block of Fuling Shale Gasfield as a research object and based on the analyses of gradients of shale gas and carbon isotope, it is found that the natural gas from Jiaoshiba area belongs to high quality hydrocarbon gas. The contents of methane is 97.22%-98.41%, with little amount of ethane and propane, average wetness of 0.74%, little amount of non-hydrocarbons such as CO2, N2 and H2, and no H2S. Carbon isotopes of methane, ethane and propane characterized by complete isotopic reversal, i.e., δ13C1>δ13C2>δ13C3. The natural gas from Wufeng-Longmaxi Formtions comes from source rocks of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, belonging to typical shale gas. According to the statistical determination criterion, natural gas in the Jiaoshiba area is derived from the sapropelic source rocks, which is a result of high temperature pyrolysis. It is a mixing product of primary kerogen pyrolysis and secondary pyrolysis of crude oil, with obvious features of secondary pyrolysis of oil. The reason for complete carbon isotopic reversal is the mixing of the two above gases. Moreover, it has some relationships with loss function of shale gas after Late Yanshan. © 2016, Science Press. All right reserved.


Niu J.,Sinopec
Xiandai Huagong/Modern Chemical Industry | Year: 2017

The acetaldehyde distillation process is unstable during operation in vinyl acetate plant, resulting in unqualified distillated acetaldehyde, blocking of trays by polymers, etc., which seriously affects the safety of production equipment. To solve these problems, the optimization and modification of acetaldehyde distillation process are carried out. Feeding and picking positions are adjusted by process analysis to control pH of the feed and key tray temperature. After the modification, the acetaldehyde distillation tower is stable. The distilled acetaldehyde meets the quality requirements. The rate of qualified product is improved and the stability of the equipment is improved. © 2017, China National Chemical Information Center. All right reserved.


Wang Z.,Sinopec
Xiandai Huagong/Modern Chemical Industry | Year: 2017

Based on the comprehensive searching for nitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR) patent documents on the CNIPR system and Thomson innovation world patent searching-platform,the general trends of the development of NBR patents,technology source and target market are introduced.The innovation subjects,their competition and cooperation are analyzed.The results show that Germany is the main technology source in the field of NBR.Lanxess of Germany and Riueng Company of Japan are the two main innovators.Their global patent strategies cover many aspects such as patent layout,cooperation application,patent assignment and licensing.The patent competition is fierce.China is the fourth largest market in the world.In recent years,the momentum of development is rapid,but the innovative power is scattered.The scale of research and development is small and the key technology is mainly dependent on the introduction of foreign technology.The layout of overseas patents is basically zero.In the end,formulation of the patent development strategies from the industry level is proposed to to improve the core competitiveness of Chinese enterprises. © 2017, China National Chemical Information Center. All right reserved.


Xu Y.,Sinopec | He M.,Sinopec
Shiyou Xuebao, Shiyou Jiagong/Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section) | Year: 2017

Based on the changes of carbon and hydrogen elements, the processes of heavy oil upgrading can be simply clarified to two routes of decarbonization and hydrogenation. Effective utilization indices of carbon and hydrogen can be introduced to evaluate the utilization degree of carbon and hydrogen in different schemes of upgrading of heavy oil by the detailed information of carbon and hydrogen distribution in feedstock and products. With atmospheric residue (AR) of Middle-East as the feedstock, the upgrading scheme of hydro-treated unit and FCC integration is better for maximizing production of gasoline, while for maximizing production of diesel the upgrading scheme of delay-coke unit and hydro-cracking unit integration is better. Generally, CO2 emission of the existing hydrogenation is around 20% higher than that of decarbonization scheme. Only the integration of deep hydro-treated unit and fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) is the best scheme to increase the effective utilization indices of carbon and hydrogen of petroleum sources, with the decrease of CO2 emission. © 2017, Editorial Office of Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section). All right reserved.


News Article | April 27, 2017
Site: www.ogj.com

Gaoqiao Petrochemical Co. Ltd., a Shanghai-based, wholly owned subsidiary of China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. (Sinopec), has agreed to acquire BP PLC’s 50% stake in SECCO Petrochemical Co. Ltd. (SECCO) for $1.68 billion.


News Article | May 5, 2017
Site: www.prweb.com

Derrick Services (UK) Ltd, DSL, has been awarded a multimillion pound contract by Centrica for Engineering, fabrication and offshore installation services on two of their production platforms which forms part of the Morecambe Bay production complex off of the coast of Lancashire and Cumbria. DSL will be supported throughout the project by Genesis Engineering in London. The contract has been won in the face of stiff competition from the traditional “tier one” offshore contractors and represents another significant step forward for DSL as their market share in asset integrity and decommissioning services continues to expand. The project workscope will involve the simplification of systems on board these two platforms to increase efficiency and production. In addition, there will be some topsides decommissioning as well as decommissioning of some of the existing systems, so as to enable Centrica to achieve a higher level of automation and increased production efficiency. The project is expected to last for around nine months and will involve the mobilisation of 50 offshore construction personnel at the height of the offshore element of the project. Mark Chandler, Operations Director of DSL stated; “this contract is the perfect platform from which to further build on the excellent work that everyone at DSL has put into establishing the reputation and track record that we now have in the Asset Integrity, decommissioning and Offshore Construction market in recent years for other Operators such as Repsol Sinopec, Apache, Conoco Phillips and Perenco in both the North and Southern sectors of the North Sea”. Mike Smith, Managing Director of DSL added; “We are delighted that the combined solution that DSL and Genesis has offered Centrica for this project has been selected in preference to the more traditional options. I believe that our combined diversity and flexibility is an attractive option to Operators looking for a more economically viable option, whilst sustaining their values with regard to safety and all aspects of project integrity and we are already in discussions about similar projects, both next year and beyond with other Operators”. DSL is an Offshore Construction Contractor providing Operators with both flexible and dynamic approach to achieving cost savings in the asset integrity and decommissioning market, offshore construction activities and associated support services such as Engineering, Project Management and Design with offices in Aberdeen, Great Yarmouth and Dubai, with regional offices elsewhere. DSL became part of the Joulon Group earlier this year in a move to help facilitate the growth potential of DSL.


News Article | May 4, 2017
Site: www.mining-journal.com

Munsun Capital Group (HK:1194) shot up 156.8% to lead Australian and Hong Kong-listed market risers, the exception in a week of strong gains for gold and cobalt juniors. Munsun soared on news its Shenzhen LP Fund had an interest in Sinopec Marketing Co, and planned to realise its interest after Sinopec’s listing, Bloomberg reported. Munsun operates five gold mines in China and last year diversified into the financial services industry. It intends to improve its mining operations, according to its annual report released last week, saying it expected “heightened political and geopolitical risks, currency depreciation and rising inflation expectations would support gold demand”. Its report outlined a 4% drop in gold production and an increased loss after tax of HK$419 million compared with HK$138 million last year, due to various transactions and equity-settled payment expenses. Great Western Exploration (AU:GTE) led the Australian bunch with a gain of 42.9% for the week, boosted by the possibility of market-favourite metal cobalt being in the vicinity of its Yerrida holdings. Its shares shot up yesterday as Riva Resources (AU:RIR) announced a potential significant cobalt discovery at its nearby Tabac project in Western Australia. Great Western said today it had received many enquiries about the company’s landholdings in the Yerrida basin following Riva’s announcement, adding that it had been focused on three different styles of mineralisation in its holdings. “However it will monitor Riva development with interest and should cobalt be confirmed in assays, then the company will progress potential similar targets within its own large landholding located within close proximity of the Tabac project,” Great Western said. A recent cobalt-nickel acquisition in Western Australia helped send Capital Mining (AU:CMY) up 33.3% for the week. The company is also planning a maiden drilling program at its lithium project in Ireland, has expanded its WA lithium portfolio and is looking to invest in a Canadian medicinal cannabis company. Meanwhile Global Geoscience (AU:GSC) was up 26.7% on news it had exercised its option to acquire 100% of the Rhyolite Ridge project in Nevada, US, and that testwork confirmed the potential for a low-cost, acid-leach process to produce Rhyolite’s lithium carbonate and boric acid.


BEIJING, May 5, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Recon Technology, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RCON), ("Recon" or the "Company"), a leading independent oilfield services provider operating primarily in China, today announced the Company's subsidiary, Nanjing Recon Technology Co. Ltd. ("Nanjing Recon") has obtained a Construction Entry Permit Certificate (the "Certificate") from Jianghan Oilfield Construction Engineering Company ("JOCEC"), a subsidiary of China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (NYSE: SNP) ("Sinopec").  Nanjing Recon is reexamined by Sinopec on annual basis, and the Certificate was renewed and is valid through March 31, 2018. The Certificate provides Recon the ability to participate in bidding for automation system projects for JOCEC within the validity period. Mr. Shenping Yin, Chairman and CEO of Recon stated, "We are pleased to receive the renewed Entry Permit Certificate, as it is a necessary step for Recon to bid for projects from Jianghan Oilfield. Recon first received this Certificate for Automation Systems last year, and believe that our service offering to Sinopec's other oilfields will only continue to expand." Founded in 2000 and headquartered in Beijing, China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation ("Sinopec") is one of the largest integrated energy and chemical companies in China. Its principal operations include the exploration and production, pipeline transportation and sale of petroleum and natural gas; the sale, storage and transportation of petroleum products, petrochemical products, coal chemical products, synthetic fiber, fertilizer and other chemical petroleum, natural gas, petroleum products, petrochemical and chemical products, and other commodities and technologies; and research, development and application of technologies and information. Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Construction Engineering Company ("JOCEC") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sinopec and a full-service oilfield construction and service company primarily serving the production facilities managed by Sinopec. Recon Technology, Ltd. is China's first listed non-state owned oil and gas field service company on NASDAQ. Recon supplies China's largest oil exploration companies, Sinopec (NYSE:SNP) and CNPC, with advanced automated technologies, efficient gathering and transportation equipment and reservoir stimulation measure for increasing petroleum extraction levels, reducing impurities and lowering production costs. Through the years, RCON has taken leading positions on several segmented markets of the oil and gas filed service industry. RCON also has developed stable long-term cooperation relationship with its major clients, and its products and service are also well accepted by clients. For additional information please visit: www.recon.cn . This news release contains forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical facts. These statements are subject to uncertainties and risks including, but not limited to, product and service demand and acceptance, changes in technology, economic conditions, the impact of competition and pricing, government regulation, and other risks contained in reports filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All such forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, and whether made by or on behalf of the company, are expressly qualified by the cautionary statements and any other cautionary statements which may accompany the forward-looking statements. In addition, the company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.


— Under the umbrella of laws, regulations, and normative acts currently in effect, countries of the developing world are tied to oil production, however, same laws alternatively stimulate a plethora of extremely attractive and competitive investment ideas, as Konstantinos Kazinakis, President and COO of Toronto-based United Bunkers Investors Corporation advises on the future of the oil industry. Overseeing 21 years of investment transactions with value approaching $1.5 billion USD, Kazinakis has shared his insights on commodity trading and the future of developing economies as seen from their potential for oil production. While optimists believe in the strong correlation between high-yield bonds and crude futures and petrol, suggesting that low interest should boost emerging countries, Kazinakis is convinced that short interest on the liquid oil shares is not always an indicator of economic performance and warns investors to be mindful of the consequences of price drops that might be quite detrimental for the bonds industry. Governments are also responding to the steady drop in oil prices especially as OPEC has refused to freeze crude production, which has been offered as a solution to stabilize the global market. Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest exporter of oil along with other member countries within the cartel acknowledge the price volatility that stroke the energy industry, but have remained reluctant to restrain the production. On the bright side, the excess in petroleum and other liquid fuels supply has been reduced by a slowdown that occurred in the non-OPEC countries, particularly in Canada and Nigeria – a solution that appeared very timely since it helped to slightly stimulate energy prices. Konstantinos Kazinakis forecasts a steady growth for consumer countries across Europe, Asia, and South America. The dipping commodity prices serve as a great stimulus for oil and gas importing nations in the European continent, and are certainly a good opportunity for newly industrialized markets, such as Japan, China, and India to boost their fiscal resilience against capital outflows. In the current context of very complex energy paradigm, the biggest winners are companies based in the rapidly growing economies of Asian and Latin American countries. Brazilian oil and gas operator Braskem S.A., for instance, saw a remarkable growth in revenues by 100% in 2013 and 2014. China’s Sinopec, the largest oil refiner and producer of oil and gas in the country, has immense advantages for further solidifying its positions in view of the global energy developments of the past years, mainly due to its colossal deposits of fuel and energy resources, unprecedented government support, and unlimited domestic demand. While uncertainties remain, the current geopolitical and economic outlook is more optimistic than it was two years ago, offering new avenues for growth and forecasting notably improved outcomes, particularly to developing countries in the BRICS geopolitical alliance led by Russia, Iran, Brazil, China, and some parts of Africa. Konstantinos Kazinakis is the President and COO of the Toronto-based United Bunkers Investors Corporation. Renowned investor with over 20 years of experience in managing trade financing domestically and internationally, he has in-depth knowledge in debt restructuring and equity investments. To date, Kazinakis’ portfolio includes transactions of over $1.5 billion and successful repositioning of $1 billion of non-performance loans. Building from his interest in oil and gas sector and shipping industry, he provides innovative solutions for commodity trading, offering comprehensive financial and logistic support to the energy companies, oil cargo and bunkering traders, refineries, and producers. United Bunkers Investors Corporation is supported by Financial Technology trade financing platform for a high technology solution to the global trade finance market, which is worth more than $ 4 Trillion US dollars a year, the gap is currently around $1.4 Trillion for the innovation in making trade financing more efficient and to protect against all risk. Konstantinos Kazinakis of United Bunkers Investors Corporation Evaluates the Benefits of Global Trade Financing: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/konstantinos-kazinakis-united-bunkers-investors-034900501.html Konstantinos Kazinakis - United Bunkers Investors Corporation - Assesses New Technology's Impact on the Global Marketplace: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/konstantinos-kazinakis-united-bunkers-investors-094500151.html For more information, please visit http://konstantinoskazinakisnews.com


News Article | April 26, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

— In this report, the global Industrial Oil market is valued at USD XX million in 2016 and is expected to reach USD XX million by the end of 2022, growing at a CAGR of XX% between 2016 and 2022. Geographically, this report split global into several key Regions, with sales (K MT), revenue (Million USD), market share and growth rate of Industrial Oil for these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering United States China Europe Japan Southeast Asia India Global Industrial Oil market competition by top manufacturers/players, with Industrial Oil sales volume, Price (USD/MT), revenue (Million USD) and market share for each manufacturer/player; the top players including Royal Dutch ExxonMobil Castrol Total Copton Sinopec FUCHS VC Lubrita BP Morris Lubricants Chevron Lukoil Cnpc Nippon Oil Valvoline On the basis of product, this report displays the sales volume (K MT), revenue (Million USD), product price (USD/MT), market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Industrial Gear Oil Hydraulic Oil Turbine Oil Heat Transfer Oil Others On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, market share and growth rate of Industrial Oil for each application, including Electric Power Industry Machine Tooling System Refrigeration Industry Iron and Steel Industry Others Global Industrial Oil Sales Market Report 2017 1 Industrial Oil Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Industrial Oil 1.2 Classification of Industrial Oil by Product Category 1.2.1 Global Industrial Oil Market Size (Sales) Comparison by Type (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Industrial Oil Market Size (Sales) Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 Industrial Gear Oil 1.2.4 Hydraulic Oil 1.2.5 Turbine Oil 1.2.6 Heat Transfer Oil 1.2.7 Others 1.3 Global Industrial Oil Market by Application/End Users 1.3.1 Global Industrial Oil Sales (Volume) and Market Share Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Electric Power Industry 1.3.3 Machine Tooling System 1.3.4 Refrigeration Industry 1.3.5 Iron and Steel Industry 1.3.6 Others 1.4 Global Industrial Oil Market by Region 1.4.1 Global Industrial Oil Market Size (Value) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 United States Industrial Oil Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Industrial Oil Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 Europe Industrial Oil Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Industrial Oil Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Industrial Oil Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 India Industrial Oil Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Industrial Oil (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Industrial Oil Sales and Growth Rate (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Industrial Oil Revenue and Growth Rate (2012-2022) … 9 Global Industrial Oil Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data 9.1 Royal Dutch 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Industrial Oil Product Category, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Product A 9.1.2.2 Product B 9.1.3 Royal Dutch Industrial Oil Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 ExxonMobil 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 Industrial Oil Product Category, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Product A 9.2.2.2 Product B 9.2.3 ExxonMobil Industrial Oil Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 Castrol 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 Industrial Oil Product Category, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Product A 9.3.2.2 Product B 9.3.3 Castrol Industrial Oil Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 Total 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Industrial Oil Product Category, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Product A 9.4.2.2 Product B 9.4.3 Total Industrial Oil Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Copton 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Industrial Oil Product Category, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Product A 9.5.2.2 Product B 9.5.3 Copton Industrial Oil Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012- …Continued For more information, please visit http://www.wiseguyreports.com


Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2022” To Its Research Database Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) market competition by top manufacturers/players, with Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) sales volume, price, revenue (Million USD) and market share for each manufacturer/player; the top players including Geographically, this report split global into several key Regions, with sales (volume), revenue (value), market share and growth rate of Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) for these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering On the basis of product, this report displays the sales volume, revenue, product price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Semi-Synthetic Automatic Transmission Fluid Full-Synthetic Automatic Transmission Fluid On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, market share and growth rate of Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) for each application, including Passenger Car Light Commercial Vehicle Heavy Commercial Vehicle Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales Market Report 2017 1 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) 1.2 Classification of Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) by Product Category 1.2.1 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Market Size (Sales) Comparison by Type (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Market Size (Sales) Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 Semi-Synthetic Automatic Transmission Fluid 1.2.4 Full-Synthetic Automatic Transmission Fluid 1.3 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Market by Application/End Users 1.3.1 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales (Volume) and Market Share Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Passenger Car 1.3.3 Light Commercial Vehicle 1.3.4 Heavy Commercial Vehicle 1.4 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Market by Region 1.4.1 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Market Size (Value) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 United States Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 Europe Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 India Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales and Growth Rate (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Revenue and Growth Rate (2012-2022) 9 Global Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data 9.1 ExxonMobil 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Product A 9.1.2.2 Product B 9.1.3 ExxonMobil Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Castrol 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Product A 9.2.2.2 Product B 9.2.3 Castrol Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 AMSOIL 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Product A 9.3.2.2 Product B 9.3.3 AMSOIL Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 AISIN 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Product A 9.4.2.2 Product B 9.4.3 AISIN Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Red Line 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Product A 9.5.2.2 Product B 9.5.3 Red Line Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Shell 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 Product A 9.6.2.2 Product B 9.6.3 Shell Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 Ford 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 Product A 9.7.2.2 Product B 9.7.3 Ford Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Honda 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 Product A 9.8.2.2 Product B 9.8.3 Honda Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 American Hitech Petroleum & Chemicals (AMTECOL) 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.9.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.9.2.1 Product A 9.9.2.2 Product B 9.9.3 American Hitech Petroleum & Chemicals (AMTECOL) Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Sinclair 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.10.2 Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Product Category, Application and Specification 9.10.2.1 Product A 9.10.2.2 Product B 9.10.3 Sinclair Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.11 Pentosin 9.12 B&M 9.13 Gulf 9.14 Super Tech 9.15 Valvoline 9.16 Afton Chemical 9.17 Petro-Canada 9.18 Royal Purple 9.19 Amalie 9.20 Sinopec Lubricant 9.21 Prestone For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1019641-global-automatic-transmission-fluid-atf-sales-market-report-2017


News Article | May 5, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Ethylene Oxide (EO) -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database This report studies Ethylene Oxide (EO) in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with Production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Region, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Ethylene Oxide (EO) in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Ethylene Oxide (EO) in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Ethylene Oxide (EO) Market Research Report 2021 1 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Ethylene Oxide (EO) 1.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Segment by Types 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Ethylene Oxide (EO) by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Type I Overview and Price 1.2.2.1 Type I Overview 1.2.2.2 Type I Growth Rate 1.2.3 Type II 1.2.3.1 Type I Overview 1.2.3.2 Type II Growth Rate 1.2.4 Type III 1.2.4.1 Type I Overview 1.2.4.2 Type II Growth Rate 1.3 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Segment by Application 1.3.1 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Application 1 and Major Clients (Buyers) List 1.3.3 Application 2 and Major Clients (Buyers) List 1.3.4 Application 3 and Major Clients (Buyers) List 1.4 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Ethylene Oxide (EO) Production and Revenue (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Ethylene Oxide (EO) Production and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.3 Global Ethylene Oxide (EO) Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 6.1 Dow Chemical 6.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.1.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.1.2.1 Type I 6.1.2.2 Type II 6.1.2.3 Type III 6.1.3 Dow Chemical Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.2 Sharq 6.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.2.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.2.2.1 Type I 6.2.2.2 Type II 6.2.2.3 Type III 6.2.3 Sharq Production, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.3 Formosa 6.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.3.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.3.2.1 Type I 6.3.2.2 Type II 6.3.2.3 Type III 6.3.3 Formosa Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.4 Yansab 6.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.4.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.4.2.1 Type I 6.4.2.2 Type II 6.4.3 Yansab Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.5 Shell 6.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.5.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.5.2.1 Type I 6.5.2.2 Type II 6.5.3 Shell Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.6 Al-Jubail Petrochemical Company 6.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.6.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.6.2.1 Type I 6.6.2.2 Type II 6.6.3 Al-Jubail Petrochemical Company Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.7 Sinopec 6.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.7.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.7.2.1 Type I 6.7.2.2 Type II 6.7.3 Sinopec Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.8 Reliance 6.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.8.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.8.2.1 Type I 6.8.2.2 Type II 6.8.3 Reliance Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.9 Basf 6.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.9.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.9.2.1 Type I 6.9.2.2 Type II 6.9.3 Basf Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.10 Indorama Ventures 6.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 6.10.2 Ethylene Oxide (EO) Product Type and Technology 6.10.2.1 Type I 6.10.2.2 Type II 6.10.3 Indorama Ventures Capacity, Revenue, Price of Ethylene Oxide (EO) (2015 and 2016) 6.11 Ineos 6.12 Huntsman 6.13 PTT Global Chemical 6.14 LyondellBasell 6.15 Indian Oil 6.16 Oriental Union Chemical 6.17 CNPC 6.18 Sibur 6.19 Nippon Shokubai 6.20 India Glycol Limited 6.21 Eastman 6.22 Kazanorgsintez 6.23 Sasol For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/599024-global-ethylene-oxide-eo-market-research-report-2021


Global Mining Lubricant market competition by top manufacturers, with production, price, revenue (value) and market share for each manufacturer; the top players including Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), market share and growth rate of Mining Lubricant in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Mineral Oil Lubricants Synthetic Lubricants On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate of Mining Lubricant for each application, including Coal Mining Iron Ore Mining Bauxite Mining Rare Earth Mineral Mining Precious Metals Mining Others At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/1227251-global-mining-lubricant-market-research-report-2017 Table of Contents Global Mining Lubricant Market Research Report 2017 1 Mining Lubricant Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Mining Lubricant 1.2 Mining Lubricant Segment by Type (Product Category) 1.2.1 Global Mining Lubricant Production and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (Product Category) (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Mining Lubricant Production Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 Mineral Oil Lubricants 1.2.4 Synthetic Lubricants 1.3 Global Mining Lubricant Segment by Application 1.3.1 Mining Lubricant Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Coal Mining 1.3.3 Iron Ore Mining 1.3.4 Bauxite Mining 1.3.5 Rare Earth Mineral Mining 1.3.6 Precious Metals Mining 1.3.7 Others 1.4 Global Mining Lubricant Market by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.1 Global Mining Lubricant Market Size (Value) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Mining Lubricant (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Mining Lubricant Revenue Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 7 Global Mining Lubricant Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Royal Dutch Shell PLC 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Product A 7.1.2.2 Product B 7.1.3 Royal Dutch Shell PLC Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 BP PLC 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Product A 7.2.2.2 Product B 7.2.3 BP PLC Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Chevron Corporation 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Product A 7.3.2.2 Product B 7.3.3 Chevron Corporation Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Exxonmobil Corporation 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Product A 7.4.2.2 Product B 7.4.3 Exxonmobil Corporation Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Total S.A. 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Product A 7.5.2.2 Product B 7.5.3 Total S.A. Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Fuchs Petrolub SE 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Product A 7.6.2.2 Product B 7.6.3 Fuchs Petrolub SE Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Petrochina Company Limited 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Product A 7.7.2.2 Product B 7.7.3 Petrochina Company Limited Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 Quaker Chemical Corporation 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Product A 7.8.2.2 Product B 7.8.3 Quaker Chemical Corporation Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Sinopec Limited 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Product A 7.9.2.2 Product B 7.9.3 Sinopec Limited Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Mining Lubricant Product Category, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Product A 7.10.2.2 Product B 7.10.3 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Mining Lubricant Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 Lukoil 7.12 Bel-Ray Company, LLC 7.13 Whitmore Manufacturing Co. 7.14 Schaeffer Manufacturing Co. 7.15 Kluber Lubrication For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1227251-global-mining-lubricant-market-research-report-2017


Built on the concept of "Internet + Supply Chain," EPEC.com is an innovative SC2B (supply chain to business) industrial e-commerce portal fueled by Sinopec's huge procurement needs. While enabling Sinopec to maximize its supply chain competitiveness, it also provides procurement, sales, financial and integrated services to many other companies, helping them reduce operating costs and reap mutual benefits from procurement management experience and results. The portal went live in April 2015 and officially started commercial operation on April 18, 2016. As of this mid-April, more than RMB92.4 billion (approximately US$13.4 billion) of orders have been executed involving over 33 million products from more than 35,000 suppliers. "Air Products is honored to be the first industrial gases supplier and the third multinational company to establish such a strategic partnership with Sinopec and EPEC on e-commerce," said Air Products' Industrial Gases China President Saw Choon Seong at the signing ceremony. "Driven by our longstanding commitment to China, we dedicate ourselves to cooperate with our distinguished customers and leading companies here, such as Sinopec, to support the country's social and economic growth." "This project is one of our efforts to support the 'Internet+' strategy and accelerate structural transformation of the manufacturing industries under the government's 13th Five-Year Plan. We can leverage the platform to help boost the 'Internet Industrial Gases' initiative and provide even stronger support to the sustainable development of China's industrial gases industry. We will continuously innovate our sales model to better serve manufacturers in the chemical and other industries with our gas offerings," Saw added. Air Products was one of the first multinational industrial gases corporations to enter China when setting up its first plant in Shenzhen in 1987. For 30 years, the company has been growing with the China market, helping customers from over 30 industries improve productivity, efficiency, quality and environmental performance with its high-quality products, leading-edge technologies and sustainable solutions. Today, the company has around 2,500 employees, more than 60 entities, over 130 production facilities, and has built more than a dozen world-class air separation units for significant energy projects in the country, including the largest on-site ASU order ever awarded to an industrial gases company. It has also established a number of regional or global capabilities, including R&D, sourcing, engineering, cryogenic equipment manufacturing, and IT application. Air Products' Global Cryogenic Equipment Manufacturing Center in Caojing produces different types of industrial gas equipment for large air separation units that have production capabilities up to 150,000 Nm3/h oxygen and is one of the company's global distillation column and cold box manufacturing centers. In addition to EPEC.com, Air Products is currently leveraging other digital platforms to enhance customer experience including its APDirect portal, WeChat customer portal, and cylinder serialization for speedy, convenient and safe delivery. Air Products (NYSE: APD) is a world-leading Industrial Gases company in operation for over 75 years. The Company's core industrial gases business provides atmospheric and process gases and related equipment to manufacturing markets, including refining and petrochemical, metals, electronics, and food and beverage. Air Products is also the world's leading supplier of liquefied natural gas process technology and equipment. The Company had fiscal 2016 sales of $7.5 billion from continuing operations in 50 countries and has a current market capitalization of approximately $30 billion. Approximately 16,000 employees are making Air Products the world's safest and best performing industrial gases company, providing sustainable offerings and excellent service to all customers. For more information, visit www.airproducts.com. NOTE: This release may contain forward-looking statements within the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on management's reasonable expectations and assumptions as of the date of this release regarding important risk factors. Actual performance and financial results may differ materially from projections and estimates expressed in the forward-looking statements because of many factors not anticipated by management, including risk factors described in the Company's Form 10K for its fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/air-products-signs-strategic-cooperation-agreement-with-sinopec-and-epec-for-e-commerce-in-china-300453113.html


News Article | May 4, 2017
Site: www.prnewswire.com

NEW YORK, May 4, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the "Company") (HKEx: 338; SSE: 600688; NYSE: SHI) announced today that its Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2017, has been posted to the Company's website at http://www.spc-ir.com.hk/eng/report.asp. The soft copy of the Company's annual report on Form 20-F could also be downloaded through its website. The Company will deliver within a reasonable time a hard copy of its 2016 annual report on Form 20-F, including its complete audited consolidated financial statements, free of charge, to any shareholder upon request.


News Article | May 4, 2017
Site: en.prnasia.com

NEW YORK, May 4, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the "Company") (HKEx: 338; SSE: 600688; NYSE: SHI) announced today that its Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2017, has been posted to the Company's website at http://www.spc-ir.com.hk/eng/report.asp. The soft copy of the Company's annual report on Form 20-F could also be downloaded through its website. The Company will deliver within a reasonable time a hard copy of its 2016 annual report on Form 20-F, including its complete audited consolidated financial statements, free of charge, to any shareholder upon request. To request a hard copy of the annual report, please write to: Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited 48 Jinyi Road, Jinshan District, Shanghai, PRC Postal Code: 200540 Attention to: the Secretariat to the Board of Directors To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sinopec-shanghai-petrochemical-files-form-20-f-300451538.html


Mr. Shenping Yin, Chairman and CEO of Recon stated, "We are pleased to receive the renewed Entry Permit Certificate, as it is a necessary step for Recon to bid for projects from Jianghan Oilfield. Recon first received this Certificate for Automation Systems last year, and believe that our service offering to Sinopec's other oilfields will only continue to expand." Founded in 2000 and headquartered in Beijing, China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation ("Sinopec") is one of the largest integrated energy and chemical companies in China. Its principal operations include the exploration and production, pipeline transportation and sale of petroleum and natural gas; the sale, storage and transportation of petroleum products, petrochemical products, coal chemical products, synthetic fiber, fertilizer and other chemical petroleum, natural gas, petroleum products, petrochemical and chemical products, and other commodities and technologies; and research, development and application of technologies and information. Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Construction Engineering Company ("JOCEC") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sinopec and a full-service oilfield construction and service company primarily serving the production facilities managed by Sinopec. Recon Technology, Ltd. is China's first listed non-state owned oil and gas field service company on NASDAQ. Recon supplies China's largest oil exploration companies, Sinopec (NYSE: SNP) and CNPC, with advanced automated technologies, efficient gathering and transportation equipment and reservoir stimulation measure for increasing petroleum extraction levels, reducing impurities and lowering production costs. Through the years, RCON has taken leading positions on several segmented markets of the oil and gas filed service industry. RCON also has developed stable long-term cooperation relationship with its major clients, and its products and service are also well accepted by clients. For additional information please visit: www.recon.cn . This news release contains forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical facts. These statements are subject to uncertainties and risks including, but not limited to, product and service demand and acceptance, changes in technology, economic conditions, the impact of competition and pricing, government regulation, and other risks contained in reports filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All such forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, and whether made by or on behalf of the company, are expressly qualified by the cautionary statements and any other cautionary statements which may accompany the forward-looking statements. In addition, the company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof. To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/recon-obtains-construction-entry-permit-certificate-from-a-sinopec-oilfield-as-automation-system-service-provider-300451400.html


5 May 2017 - Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. (TSXV: FO, AIM: FOG, ESM: FAC) is pleased to note Origin Energy Limited ("Origin") announced today it has acquired Sasol Petroleum Australia Limited's ("Sasol") 35% interest in in the Beetaloo Joint Venture*, bringing its interest to 70%. Sasol departs the Joint Venture to focus its capital investment on its African and North American footprint. This transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including Government approval. The transaction will not impact Falcon's 2014 farmout agreement as Origin will now assume 100% of the future costs of the farmout. Philip O'Quigley, CEO of Falcon, commented: "Having recently announced the discovery of a material shale gas resource in the Beetaloo Basin, Origin's doubling of its interest in the Beetaloo Joint Venture is a significant endorsement in what some regard as the Northern Territory's most prospective onshore basin for shale gas. We look forward with Origin to progressing our understanding of the entire play while maturing the contingent resources to reserves over time, subject to the outcome of the Northern Territory's inquiry into hydraulic fracturing. Falcon recognises Sasol's contribution to the Beetaloo Joint Venture and wishes them the very best for the future." About Origin Origin (ASX: ORG) is the leading Australian integrated energy company with market leading positions in energy retailing (approximately 4.2 million customer accounts), power generation (approximately 6,000 MW of capacity owned and contracted) and natural gas production (1,204 PJ of 2P reserves and annual production of 75 PJe). Through Australia Pacific LNG, its incorporated joint venture with ConocoPhillips and Sinopec, Origin is developing Australia's biggest CSG to LNG project based on the country's largest 2P CSG reserves base. About Sasol Sasol is an international integrated chemicals and energy company that leverages the talent and expertise of about 30,100 people working in 33 countries. Sasol develops and commercialise technologies, and build and operate world-scale facilities to produce a range of high-value product streams, including liquid fuels, chemicals and low-carbon electricity. Sasol, through its subsidiary, Sasol Exploration and Production International ("E&PI") develops and manages the group's upstream interests in oil and gas exploration and production in Mozambique, South Africa, Australia, Canada and Gabon. It produces natural gas and condensate from Mozambique's Pande and Temane fields, shale gas from their share in the Farrell Creek and Cypress A assets in Canada, and oil in Gabon through their share in the offshore Etame Marin Permit. E&PI sells Mozambican gas under long-term contracts to Sasol Gas and external customers, condensate on short term contracts, while selling Canadian gas into the market at spot prices. Oil is sold to customers under annual contracts. For more information go to www.sasol.com Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Certain information in this press release may constitute forward-looking information. This information is based on current expectations that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Such information may include, but is not limited to comments made with respect to the awarding of an exploration license in South Africa, to the type, number, schedule, testing and objectives of the wells to be drilled in the Beetaloo basin Australia, expected contributions of the partners, the prospectivity of the Middle Velkerri shale play and the prospect of the exploration programme being brought to commerciality. Actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. Falcon assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those reflected in the forward looking-statements unless and until required by securities laws applicable to Falcon. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is contained in Falcon's filings with the Canadian securities regulators, which filings are available at www.sedar.com.


The global propylene market is forecast to grow at a CAGR around 6% during 2016-2025, on account of growing industrialization and rising demand for demand for eco-friendly paints across commercial and residential set ups. Additionally, announcements of various emerging OPT plants for propylene coupled with smooth trading practices between countries is boosting global propylene market. Propylene belongs to alkene class of hydrocarbons which is volatile and extremely flammable. It is one of the most extensively used organic chemical compound in the world. FCC splitters and On-Purpose Technology (OPT) are most widely used propylene production technologies across the globe. Propylene, one of the most important base chemicals, forms the building block for various chemical derivatives such as polypropylene, oxo-alcohols, propylene oxide, acrylic acid, acrylonitrile, cumene, acrolein, alkylates, dimersol, polymer gasoline, propylene oligomers, iso-butyl benzene, EPDM rubbers and isopropyl alcohol. Propylene and its derivatives are widely utilized for production of variety of downstream chemical products that find application in automotive and packaging applications. Moreover, expanding automotive sector, coupled with growing industrialization and booming packaging industry are anticipated to drive demand for propylene across the globe in the coming years. Furthermore, polypropylene is projected to dominate global propylene market, on account of increasing government regulations for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in environment supported by tremendous growth in the production of light commercial vehicles and packaging industries. Few of the leading players operating in global propylene market include Sinopec Corp., CNPC and ExxonMobil Corporation, among others. Global Propylene Market By Application, By Region, Competition Forecast and Opportunities, 2011 - 2025 discusses For more information about this report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/64spfd/global_propylene Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager press@researchandmarkets.com For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716 To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/research-and-markets---global-propylene-market-competition-forecast-and-opportunities-2025---leading-players-are-sinopec-corp-cnpc-and-exxonmobil-corporation-300444195.html


News Article | April 19, 2017
Site: www.prnewswire.com

This research report incorporates an in-depth analysis of the global refinery catalyst market, including market estimations and trends through 2021. The report also analyzes major catalysts materials that comprise zeolites, metals, chemical compounds and others (bio-catalysts and enzymes). The refinery catalyst market in terms of products includes fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts; alkylation catalysts; hydroprocessing catalysts, which include hydrotreating and hydrocracking catalysts; hydrogen manufacturing refinery catalysts; hydrodesulfurization catalysts; isomerization catalysts; and others (gas sweetening and sulfur recovering catalysts). Major players, competitive intelligence, market dynamics and regional opportunities are discussed in detail in the report. The report also discusses recent developments and company profiles of the major players in the industry. Report Includes - An overview of the global markets for refinery catalysts and related technologies - Analyses of global market trends, with data from 2015, estimates for 2016, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2021 - Detailed analysis of how these catalysts refine crude oil and help refiners meet fuel standards, better manage operational efficiency, and enhance conversion - Breakdowns of the refinery catalysts market into the submarkets for types and ingredients - Further breakdowns into the micro-markets for hydro-processing, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation, hydrogen manufacturing, hydrodesulphurization, isomerization, and other catalysts - Profiles of major players in the industry Key Topics Covered: 1: Introduction - Study Goals And Objectives - Global Refinery Catalyst Market Description - Scope Of The Report - Market Structure - Intended Audience - Research Methodology - Analyst's Credentials 2: Summary 3: Market Overview - Definition Of Refinery Catalysts - Classification Of Refinery Catalysts - Petroleum Refining Catalyst - Regulations And Policies Impacting Refinery Catalysts Market - Environmental Issues - Market Drivers - Market Restraints - Market Opportunities - Trends 4: Refinery Catalyst Market By Ingredient - Zeolites - Metals - Chemicals - Other Catalysts 5: Refinery Catalyst Market By Product - Fluid Catalytic Cracking Catalyst - Alkylation Catalysts - Hydroprocessing Catalysts - Hydrogen Manufacturing Refinery Catalysts - Hydrodesulfurization Catalysts - Isomerization Catalysts - Others 6: Refinery Catalyst Market By Region - North America - Europe - Asia-Pacific - Rest Of World (Row) - Saudi Arabia - Rest Of Row 7: Company Profiles - Albemarle Corporation - Axens - Basf Catalyst Llc - CB & I - Clariant - Criterion - Evonik Industries AG - Exxonmobil Corp - Grace - Haldortopsoe - Headwaters - Honeywell - Johnson Matthey - Lyondellbasell - Nippon Ketjen - Polynt - Pq Corp. - Shell Global Solutions - Sinopec Catalyst Co. - Sud-Chemie Ag - Unicat Catalyst Technologies Inc. - Uop Llc - W R Grace & Co. - Zeolyst 8: Patent Analysis For more information about this report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/mgldzb/refinery Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager press@researchandmarkets.com For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716 To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-refinery-catalysts-technologies-and-markets-report-2017---research-and-markets-300441118.html


This report focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturerPune, India - April 25, 2017 /MarketersMedia/ — Summary This report studies Lubricants for Wind Turbines in Global market, especially in North America, China, Europe, Southeast Asia, Japan and India, with production, revenue, consumption, import and export in these regions, from 2012 to 2016, and forecast to 2022. This report focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Shell Exxon Mobil BP Total Lubricants Axel Christiernsson Chevron FUCHS LUKOIL SKF JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation Petro-Canada Indian Oil Corporation Quaker Chemical Southwestern Petroleum Corporation Klüber Dow Corning Sinopec CNPC CNOOC Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1219915-global-lubricants-for-wind-turbines-market-professional-survey-report-2017 By types, the market can be split into Liquid Lubricants Solid Lubricants By Application, the market can be split into On-shore Off-shore By Regions, this report covers (we can add the regions/countries as you want) North America China Europe Southeast Asia Japan India At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/1219915-global-lubricants-for-wind-turbines-market-professional-survey-report-2017 Table of Contents Global Lubricants for Wind Turbines Market Professional Survey Report 2017 1 Industry Overview of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 1.1 Definition and Specifications of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 1.1.1 Definition of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 1.1.2 Specifications of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 1.2 Classification of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 1.2.1 Liquid Lubricants 1.2.2 Solid Lubricants 1.3 Applications of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 1.3.1 On-shore 1.3.2 Off-shore 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Market Segment by Regions 1.4.1 North America 1.4.2 China 1.4.3 Europe 1.4.4 Southeast Asia 1.4.5 Japan 1.4.6 India 2 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 2.1 Raw Material and Suppliers 2.2 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 2.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 2.4 Industry Chain Structure of Lubricants for Wind Turbines …. 8 Major Manufacturers Analysis of Lubricants for Wind Turbines 8.1 Shell 8.1.1 Company Profile 8.1.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.1.2.1 Product A 8.1.2.2 Product B 8.1.3 Shell 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.1.4 Shell 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.2 Exxon Mobil 8.2.1 Company Profile 8.2.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.2.2.1 Product A 8.2.2.2 Product B 8.2.3 Exxon Mobil 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.2.4 Exxon Mobil 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.3 BP 8.3.1 Company Profile 8.3.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.3.2.1 Product A 8.3.2.2 Product B 8.3.3 BP 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.3.4 BP 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.4 Total Lubricants 8.4.1 Company Profile 8.4.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.4.2.1 Product A 8.4.2.2 Product B 8.4.3 Total Lubricants 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.4.4 Total Lubricants 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.5 Axel Christiernsson 8.5.1 Company Profile 8.5.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.5.2.1 Product A 8.5.2.2 Product B 8.5.3 Axel Christiernsson 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.5.4 Axel Christiernsson 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.6 Chevron 8.6.1 Company Profile 8.6.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.6.2.1 Product A 8.6.2.2 Product B 8.6.3 Chevron 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.6.4 Chevron 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.7 FUCHS 8.7.1 Company Profile 8.7.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.7.2.1 Product A 8.7.2.2 Product B 8.7.3 FUCHS 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.7.4 FUCHS 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.8 LUKOIL 8.8.1 Company Profile 8.8.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.8.2.1 Product A 8.8.2.2 Product B 8.8.3 LUKOIL 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.8.4 LUKOIL 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.9 SKF 8.9.1 Company Profile 8.9.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.9.2.1 Product A 8.9.2.2 Product B 8.9.3 SKF 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.9.4 SKF 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.10 JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation 8.10.1 Company Profile 8.10.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.10.2.1 Product A 8.10.2.2 Product B 8.10.3 JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.10.4 JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation 2016 Lubricants for Wind Turbines Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.11 Petro-Canada 8.12 Indian Oil Corporation 8.13 Quaker Chemical 8.14 Southwestern Petroleum Corporation 8.15 Klüber 8.16 Dow Corning 8.17 Sinopec 8.18 CNPC 8.19 CNOOC Buy Now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=1219915 Continued.... Contact Us: sales@wiseguyreports.com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (US) ; Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (UK) Contact Info:Name: NORAH TRENTEmail: sales@wiseguyreports.comOrganization: WISE GUY RESEARCH CONSULTANTS PVT LTDAddress: Pune -40027, Maharashtra, IndiaPhone: 841 198 5042Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/lubricants-for-wind-turbines-market-global-industry-analysis-key-vendors-opportunity-forecast-2017-to-2022/189932For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1219915-global-lubricants-for-wind-turbines-market-professional-survey-report-2017Source: MarketersMediaRelease ID: 189932


News Article | April 18, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Pipeline Layer Barge -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis of Top Key Player Forecast To 2022” To Its Research Database This report studies the Pipeline Layer Barge market status and outlook of global and major regions, from angles of players, regions, product types and end industries; this report analyzes the top players in global and major regions, and splits the Pipeline Layer Barge market by product type and applications/end industries. The global Pipeline Layer Barge market is valued at XX million USD in 2016 and is expected to reach XX million USD by the end of 2022, growing at a CAGR of XX% between 2016 and 2022. The Asia-Pacific will occupy for more market share in following years, especially in China, also fast growing India and Southeast Asia regions. North America, especially The United States, will still play an important role which cannot be ignored. Any changes from United States might affect the development trend of Pipeline Layer Barge. Europe also play important roles in global market, with market size of xx million USD in 2016 and will be xx million USD in 2022, with a CAGR of XX. Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share (%) and growth Rate (%) of Pipeline Layer Barge in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering USA China Europe Japan India Southeast Asia On the basis of product, the Pipeline Layer Barge market is primarily split into S-Lay Pipeline Installation Tow-In Pipeline Installation J-Lay Pipeline Installation Others On the basis on the end users/applications, this report covers Deepwater Shallowater Others Global Pipeline Layer Barge Sales Market Report 2017 1 Pipeline Layer Barge Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Pipeline Layer Barge 1.2 Classification of Pipeline Layer Barge by Product Category 1.2.1 Global Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units) and Growth (%) Comparison by Types (2012-2022) 1.2.2 Global Pipeline Layer Barge Sales Market Share (%) by Types in 2016 1.2.3 S-Lay Pipeline Installation 1.2.4 Tow-In Pipeline Installation 1.2.5 J-Lay Pipeline Installation 1.2.5 Others 1.3 Global Pipeline Layer Barge Market by Applications/End Users 1.3.1 Global Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units) Comparison by Applications (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Deepwater 1.3.3 Shallowater 1.3.4 Others 9 Global Pipeline Layer Barge Players Profiles and Sales Data 9.1 Allseas 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Product A 9.1.2.2 Product B 9.1.3 Allseas Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Saipem 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Product A 9.2.2.2 Product B 9.2.3 Saipem Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 Global Industries 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Product A 9.3.2.2 Product B 9.3.3 Global Industries Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 Subsea 7 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Product A 9.4.2.2 Product B 9.4.3 Subsea 7 Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 ZPMC 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Product A 9.5.2.2 Product B 9.5.3 ZPMC Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Daewoo 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 Product A 9.6.2.2 Product B 9.6.3 Daewoo Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 Offshore Oil Engineering 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 Product A 9.7.2.2 Product B 9.7.3 Offshore Oil Engineering Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Sinopec Petroleum Engineering & Construction Shengli 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 Product A 9.8.2.2 Product B 9.8.3 Sinopec Petroleum Engineering & Construction Shengli Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 CIMC Raffles 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.9.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.9.2.1 Product A 9.9.2.2 Product B 9.9.3 CIMC Raffles Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Dredge Brokers 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.10.2 Pipeline Layer Barge Product Category, Application and Specification 9.10.2.1 Product A 9.10.2.2 Product B 9.10.3 Dredge Brokers Pipeline Layer Barge Sales (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.11 Van Oord 9.12 Horizon Ship Brokers For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1193293-global-pipeline-layer-barge-sales-market-report-2017


News Article | May 4, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

— Global Hydrochloric Acid Market 2012- 2022 Report provides detailed analysis of market in 9 chapters with required tables and figures. Applications covered in this report are Organic Chemical Raw Materials, Metal Cleaning and Treatment, Food and Dairy Industry and Water Treatment. This report also provides key analysis for the geographical regions like Europe, North America, China, Japan & Korea. Companies like Dow Chemical, Olin, Covestro, Oxychem, Axiall, Inovyn, Westlake Chemical, Basf, Shin-Etsu Chemical, Unid, Orica Watercare, Detrex Chemicals, Canexus, Solvay, Erco Worldwide, Dupont, Coogee Chemicals, Tessenderlo Group, Agc, Formosa Plastics, Toagosei, China Greenon, Haijing Chemical, Xiyang Fertilizer, Shanghai Chlor-Alkali Chemical, Luxi Chemical, Sinopec Nanjing Chemical, Tianyuan Chemical, Jinniu Chemical And Hongri Acron, Jiheng Chemical, Nanning Chemical Industry, Ningbo Oceanking Chemical, Gehua Group, Haohua Chemical and more are profiled in this report providing information on sale, price, sales regions, products and overview. Purchase a copy of this report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/buy-now/494291 Table of Contents: 1 Market Overview 1.1 Objectives of Research 1.2 Market Segment 2 Industry Chain 2.1 Industry Chain Structure 2.2 Upstream 2.3 Market 3 Environmental Analysis 3.1 Policy 3.2 Economic 3.3 Technology 3.4 Market Entry 4 Major Vendors 5 Market/Vendors Distribution 5.1 Regional Distribution 5.2 Product and Application 6 Regions Market 6.1 Global 6.2 Europe 6.3 North America 6.4 China 6.5 Japan & Korea 6.6 Trade 7 Forecast 7.1 Market Trends 7.2 Segment Forecast 8 Marketing Overview 8.1 Ex-factory Price 8.2 Buyer Price 8.3 Price Factors 8.4 Marketing Channel 9 Conclusion Inquire more about this report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/ask-your-query/494291 For more information, please visit https://www.themarketreports.com/report/global-hydrochloric-acid-market-research-2011-2022


News Article | April 25, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

Global Adipic Acid Industry Report covering market by types, Regions, Application, and leading vendor’s profile based on sales, price, sales regions, products, profile etc.Pune, India - April 24, 2017 /MarketersMedia/ — Global Adipic Acid Market 2012- 2022 Report provides detailed analysis of market in 9 chapters with required tables and figures. Access this report at https://www.themarketreports.com/report/global-adipic-acid-market-research-2011-2022 Global Adipic Acid Market report classifies Adipic Acid types as Oxidation of Cyclohexane, Oxidation of Cyclohexene and Hydrogenation of Phenol. Applications covered in this report are Nylon 6,6 Polyurethanes Plasticizers and Food Additives. This report also provides key analysis for the geographical regions like Europe, North America, China, Japan & Korea. Companies like INVISTA, Rhodia, Ascend, BASF, Radici, Asahi Kasei, DuPont, LANXESS, Haili, Huafon, Shenma Industrial, Hualu-Hengsheng, Zhejiang Shuyang, Kailuan Group, Liaoyang Sinopec, Hongye, Tianli, Yangmei Fengxi and more are profiled in this report providing information on sale, price, sales regions, products and overview. Purchase a copy of this report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/buy-now/483925 Table of Contents: 1 Market Overview 1.1 Objectives of Research 1.2 Market Segment 2 Industry Chain 2.1 Industry Chain Structure 2.2 Upstream 2.3 Market 3 Environmental Analysis 3.1 Policy 3.2 Economic 3.3 Technology 3.4 Market Entry 4 Major Vendors 5 Market/Vendors Distribution 5.1 Regional Distribution 5.2 Product and Application 6 Regions Market 6.1 Global 6.2 Europe 6.3 North America 6.4 China 6.5 Japan & Korea 6.6 Trade 7 Forecast 7.1 Market Trends 7.2 Segment Forecast 8 Marketing Overview 8.1 Ex-factory Price 8.2 Buyer Price 8.3 Price Factors 8.4 Marketing Channel 9 Conclusion Inquire more about this report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/ask-your-query/483925 Contact Info:Name: Shirsh GuptaEmail: sales@themarketreports.comOrganization: The Market ReportsAddress: SF-29, Sacred World, Wanawadi, PunePhone: 6314071315Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/global-adipic-acid-market-is-estimated-to-reach-3-3-million-usd-in-2017/189703For more information, please visit https://www.themarketreports.com/report/global-adipic-acid-market-research-2011-2022Source: MarketersMediaRelease ID: 189703


Wu Y.-S.,Colorado School of Mines | Di Y.,Peking University | Kang Z.,Sinopec | Fakcharoenphol P.,Colorado School of Mines
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering | Year: 2011

The existence of vugs or cavities in naturally fractured reservoirs has long been observed. Even though these vugs are known for their large attribution to reserves of oil, natural gas, or groundwater, few quantitative investigations of fractured vuggy reservoirs have been conducted. In this paper, a multiple-continuum conceptual model is presented, based on geological data and observations of core samples from carbonate formations in China, to investigate single-phase and multiphase flow behavior in such vuggy fractured reservoirs. The conceptual model has been implemented into a three-dimensional, three-phase reservoir simulator with a generalized multiple-continuum modeling approach. The conceptual model considers fractured vuggy rock as a triple- or multiple-continuum medium, consisting of (1) highly permeable and well-connected fractures, (2) low-permeability rock matrix, and (3) various-sized vugs. The matrix system may contain a large number of small or isolated cavities, whereas vugs are larger cavities, indirectly connected to fractures through small fractures, microfractures or matrix. Similar to the conventional double-porosity model, the fracture continuum is primarily responsible for the occurrence of global flow, while vuggy and matrix continua, providing storage space, are locally connected to each other and interacting with globally connecting fractures. In addition, flow in fractured vuggy reservoirs may be further complicated by occurrence of non-Darcy's and other nonlinear flow behavior, because of large pore space and high-permeability flow channels. To account for such complicated flow regime, our model formulation includes non-Darcy flow using the multiphase extension of the Forchheimer equation as well as flow according to parallel-wall fracture and tube models, based on solutions of flow through a parallel-wall, uniform fracture and Hagen-Poiseuille tube flow. © 2011.


Feng Y.,Peking University | Feng Y.,Sinopec | Zou R.,Peking University | Xia D.,Peking University | And 2 more authors.
Journal of Materials Chemistry A | Year: 2013

Hydrothermal treatment of cobalt nitrate in the presence of ZnO nanorod templates results in the generation of free-standing CoO-ZnO composite arrays on a copper substrate. The result shows that tuning the molar concentration of cobalt nitrate can controllably prepare CoO-ZnO nanotube and ZnCo 2O4 hierarchical nanorod structures. The electrochemical properties of the resultant nanorod and nanotube arrays are investigated. Due to the short insertion and extraction length for lithium ions, the free space between the adjacent tubes or rods, and the high contact area, the as-prepared one-dimensional CoO-ZnO composites exhibit excellent cycling performance and high capacities as anode materials for Li-ion batteries. © 2013 The Royal Society of Chemistry.


Wang Z.,Beijing Normal University | Qi Y.,Beijing Normal University | Wang J.,Sinopec | Pei Y.,Beijing Normal University
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology | Year: 2012

Both β-proteobacterial aerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (ANAMMOX) bacteria were investigated in the hyporheic zone of a contaminated river in China containing high ammonium levels and low chemical oxygen demand. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and cloning-sequencing were employed in this study. FISH analysis illustrated that AOB (average population of 3. 5 %) coexisted with ANAMMOX bacteria (0. 7 %). The DGGE profile revealed a high abundance and diversity of bacteria at the water-air-soil interface rather than at the water-soil interface. The redundancy analysis correlated analysis showed that the diversity of ANAMMOX bacteria was positively related to the redox potential. The newly detected sequences of ANAMMOX organisms principally belonged to the genus Candidatus "Brocadia", while most ammonia monooxygenase subunit-A gene amoA sequences were affiliated with Nitrosospira and Nitrosomonas. These results suggest that the water-air-soil interface performs an important function in the nitrogen removal process and that the bioresources of AOB and ANAMMOX bacteria can potentially be utilized for the eutrophication of rivers. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.


Kang Y.,China Institute of Technology | Wang H.,Sinopec
Journal of Convergence Information Technology | Year: 2011

With respect to product design alternative selection problems with interval numbers information, some operational laws of interval numbers are introduced. Then a new aggregation operator called uncertain choquet integral (UCI) operator is proposed, and some desirable properties of the UCI operators are studied, such as commutativity, idempotency and monotonicity. An UCI operators-based approach is developed to solve the product design alternative selection under uncertain environment. Finally, an illustrative example with product design alternative selection is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.


Zhao S.,Tianjin University of Technology | Li M.,Sinopec | Chu Y.,Sinopec | Chen J.,Tianjin University of Technology
Energy and Fuels | Year: 2014

The bifunctional Ni2P/SAPO-11 was tested for the hydroconversion (involving deoxygenation and hydroisomerization) of methyl laurate as a model compound to hydrocarbons. The influences of reaction conditions, catalyst stability, and catalyst deactivation were investigated. For comparison, the performance of Ni/SAPO-11 was also examined. The result shows that the increase of temperature and the deceases of weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) and H2 pressure favored the conversion of methyl laurate meanwhile promoted the decarbonylation and hydroisomerization as well as cracking reactions. Apart from the Ni sites that were dominating for deoxygenation, the acid sites also affected the deoxygenation pathway. Due to more medium strength acid sites, Ni/SAPO-11 gave higher selectivity to isoalkanes and more preferentially catalyzed the hydrodeoxygenation pathway to produce the C12 hydrocarbons than Ni2P/SAPO-11. During the test for 101 h, Ni2P/SAPO-11 exhibited greatly superior stability to Ni/SAPO-11 for the deoxygenation of methyl laurate, while both Ni2P/SAPO-11 and Ni/SAPO-11 were deactivated for the hydroisomerization. Under the condition of 360 °C, 3.0 MPa, WHSV of 2 h-1, and H2/methyl laurate molar ratio of 25, the conversion of methyl laurate was close to 100% and the total selectivity to isoundecane and isododecane decreased from 36.9% to 28.6% on Ni2P/SAPO-11. To explore the catalyst deactivation, the fresh and the used catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, Raman spectroscopy, and N2 adsorption-desorption. The sintering of Ni particles and carbonaceous deposit contribute to inferior stability of Ni/SAPO-11 for both deoxygenation and hydroisomerization, while no obvious sintering of Ni2P particles took place and the carbonaceous deposit mainly led to the loss of the activity for hydroisomerization on Ni2P/SAPO-11. We propose that carbonaceous deposit mostly formed on the acid sites that are indispensible for hydroisomerization. © 2014 American Chemical Society.


Zheng C.,Sinopec | Wang M.,Tianjin University of Science and Technology | Wang M.,CAS Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology | Wang Y.,CAS Lanzhou Institute of Geology and Geophysics | Huang Z.,CAS Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology
Bioresource Technology | Year: 2012

Oil extraction from oil sludge with biosurfactant formulas was optimized by a Taguchi orthogonal array design of L16 (4 5) with five main factors, including biosurfactant type (surfactin, lichenysin, rhamnolipid and emulsan), biosurfactant concentration, pH, salinity and solvent. Oil recoveries obtained with the sixteen batch washing experiments with the selected levels of each factor were processed with Design Expert/SPSS and a specific combination of factors with a predicted oil recovery of 76.81% was obtained. The predicted optimal biosurfactant formula of 2.0g/L rhamnolipid, pH 12.0, 10g/L NaCl, and 5.0g/L n-butanol were validated by a washing experiment that yielded an oil recovery of 74.55%, which was 27.28% higher than the grand average oil recovery of the whole experiment design. Based on the optimum biosurfactant formula, the oil extraction process followed first-order kinetics as the washing rate constant and final oil recovery increased with temperature. These results will be informative and meaningful for the design of oil sludge treatment in industrial application. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.


Patent
Beijing Electrical Power Research Institute, Sinopec, State Grid Corporation of China and Beijing Electric Power Company | Date: 2012-01-20

Disclosed in the disclosure are a method and a device for processing geological information. The method for processing the geological information comprises: acquiring multiple geological image graphs; determining the relation between the image coordinate and the ground coordinate of each of the multiple geological image graphs by an imaging mode of geological images; and joining the multiple geological image graphs together according to the relation between the image coordinate and the ground coordinate of each of the multiple geological image graphs. The large-scale ground images can be acquired by processing the geological images according to the present disclosure.


Patent
Beijing Electrical Power Research Institute, Beijing Electric Power Company, State Grid Corporation of China and Sinopec | Date: 2014-03-26

Disclosed in the invention are a method and a device for processing geological information. The method for processing the geological information comprises: acquiring multiple geological image graphs; determining the relation between the image coordinate and the ground coordinate of each of the multiple geological image graphs by an imaging mode of geological images; and joining the multiple geological image graphs together according to the relation between the image coordinate and the ground coordinate of each of the multiple geological image graphs. The large-scale ground images can be acquired by processing the geological images according to the present invention.


News Article | February 15, 2017
Site: www.businesswire.com

BEIJING--(BUSINESS WIRE)--cippe 2017 (the 17th China International Petroleum & Petrochemical Technology and Equipment Exhibition) will be held on March 20-22, 2017 at New China International Exhibition Center in Beijing. With an exhibition area of 100,000m2, the event will gather around 2,000 exhibitors from 65 countries and regions, including 50 Fortune Global 500 companies and 18 international pavilions, to display the latest cutting-edge petrochemical and equipment technologies and products. cippe is an approved member of the Global Association of the Exhibition Industry (UFI) and enjoys the support of China’s Ministry of Commerce. This year as the petroleum industry is setting to revive, cippe will present a more professional, valuable and wonderful event for the industry players. In 2017, apart from the existing Oil Exploration & Development, Offshore Oil & Gas, Offshore Engineering, Oil & Gas Pipeline, Shale Gas, Natural Gas and Explosion-proof Equipment zones, the event will add professional exhibition zones for more market segments, including Valves, Fire Control, Oilfield & Land Conservation, in a bid to build a more precise and professional matching platform for buyers. So far, companies that have confirmed to attend include Caterpillar, NOV, Schlumberger, GE, Honeywell, DOW Chemical, Rockwell, Transneft, Rosneft, Akzo, API, 3M, E+H, MTU, Hempel, CNPC, Sinopec, CNOOC, CSSC, CSIC, CASC, Jereh, Kerui, RG Petro-Machinery, Sany Heavy Industry, Northern Heavy Industries Group, CITIC Pacific, HBP, Jerrywon, LandOcean Energy, Anton Oilfield, Shanghai Shenkai, Tiehu Petromachinery, Tidfore, CNOOC, DS Group and Warom Technology. Building professional forums to help insiders look into the future cippe 2017 will continue to hold the 9th International Petroleum Summit highlighting low-cost development, which will analyze industry prospects and policies to come up with feasible practices and technologies. Multiple other technology seminars and symposiums will be held concurrently. During cippe 2017, the organizer Zhenwei Expo will partner with Xi'an Shiyou University and Shanxi Petroleum Society to hold the 2017 International Petroleum & Petrochemical Technology Conference, covering the full industry chain including offshore petroleum exploration, drilling and producing engineering, oil & gas storage and transportation, etc. Besides, cippe will launch the Middle East session by cooperating with Petroleum Association of Middle East (PAME) and Business Gateways International. LLC., (BGI) of Oman. While BGI Oman will introduce in details about its Joint Supplier Registration System (JSRS) to facilitate Chinese petroleum companies to enter Omanis market, PAME will elaborate on the opportunities, challenges and strategies in the Middle Eastern market. cippe 2017 will attract over 100 buyer and visitor delegations comprised of government institutions, industry associations and companies. Rosneft, Gazprom, Transneft, Saudi Aramco, Statoil, NIOC, INOC, Qatargas, Saudi Aramco, Emirates National Oil, Petronas, KNPC, PDVSA, EVOLEN, PAME, DNV, and other industry associations from the Netherlands, India and France.


This report studies sales (consumption) of Catalysts in United States market, focuses on the top players, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player, covering Haldor Topsoe Albemarle W.R. Grace BASF SE Honeywell Axens S.A. Sinopec Johnson Matthey Clariant AG … View Full Report With Complete TOC, List Of Figure and Table: http://globalqyresearch.com/united-states-catalysts-market-report-2016 Split by product types, with sales, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Hydrotretaing Catalysts FCC Catalysts Alkylation Catalysts Hydrocracking Catalysts Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Catalysts in each application, can be divided into Petrochemical Application 2 Application 3 United States Catalysts Market Report 2016 1 Catalysts Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Catalysts 1.2 Classification of Catalysts 1.2.11 Hydrotretaing Catalysts 1.2.12 FCC Catalysts 1.2.13 Alkylation Catalysts 1.2.14 Hydrocracking Catalysts 1.3 Application of Catalysts 1.3.11 Petrochemical 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 United States Market Size Sales (Value) and Revenue (Volume) of Catalysts (2011-2021) 1.4.1 United States Catalysts Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.4.2 United States Catalysts Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 5 United States Catalysts Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 5.1 Haldor Topsoe 5.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 5.1.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.1.2.1 Type I 5.1.2.2 Type II 5.1.3 Haldor Topsoe Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.2 Albemarle 5.2.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.2.2.1 Type I 5.2.2.2 Type II 5.2.3 Albemarle Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.3 W.R. Grace 5.3.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.3.2.1 Type I 5.3.2.2 Type II 5.3.3 W.R. Grace Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.4 BASF SE 5.4.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.4.2.1 Type I 5.4.2.2 Type II 5.4.3 BASF SE Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.5 Honeywell 5.5.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.5.2.1 Type I 5.5.2.2 Type II 5.5.3 Honeywell Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.6 Axens S.A. 5.6.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.6.2.1 Type I 5.6.2.2 Type II 5.6.3 Axens S.A. Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.7 Sinopec 5.7.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.7.2.1 Type I 5.7.2.2 Type II 5.7.3 Sinopec Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.8 Johnson Matthey 5.8.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.8.2.1 Type I 5.8.2.2 Type II 5.8.3 Johnson Matthey Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.9 Clariant AG 5.9.2 Catalysts Product Type, Application and Specification 5.9.2.1 Type I 5.9.2.2 Type II 5.9.3 Clariant AG Catalysts Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview … Global QYResearch ( http://globalqyresearch.com/ ) is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.


News Article | December 6, 2016
Site: www.marketwired.com

CALGARY, AB--(Marketwired - December 06, 2016) - Sinopec Canada is pleased to announce that it was the recipient of the Gold Business Excellence Award from the Canada China Business Council (CCBC) in the category of Chinese Investment in Canada. The award was presented at the CCBC's biennial luncheon held in Toronto on December 2, 2016. The independent panel of judges highlighted Sinopec Canada's cultural integration, community investment and contributions to the Canadian economy in announcing the selection. "We are honoured and humbled to receive this award from the CCBC," stated Brian Tuffs, Sinopec Canada's Chief Executive Officer. "We pride ourselves on the collaborative nature of our organization as we seek to leverage Sinopec's technical expertise in Canada and abroad to maximize the sustainability and profitability of our operations in Canada. Sinopec Canada also would like to take the opportunity to acknowledge the CCBC for its efforts in recognizing the successes of many other companies focused on the Canada-China bilateral relationship." Additional information regarding the award can be found at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz10Zwqy69U About Sinopec Canada Sinopec Canada is a diversified unconventional oil and natural gas company. The Company has a balanced mix of crude oil, liquids-rich and resource play natural gas, and holds a 9.03% interest in the Syncrude Oil Sands Joint Venture and is a 10% partner in the Pacific Northwest LNG Project. Sinopec Canada is a business unit of Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration and Production Corporation (SIPC) and is indirectly owned by China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec Group), one of the world's largest energy companies. Sinopec Canada is a trade name of Sinopec Daylight Energy Ltd., Sinopec Canada Energy Ltd. and SinoCanada Petroleum Corporation


News Article | February 15, 2017
Site: www.prweb.com

DuPont Clean Technologies (DuPont) announces that China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec) has awarded DuPont the license and engineering contract for its STRATCO® Alkylation Technology. The new unit is to be located at the existing Sinopec Tianjin Company (TPCC) refinery in the Tianjin Binhai New Area district. The addition of the STRATCO® sulfuric acid alkylation unit will improve the quality of the existing refinery gasoline pool to ensure compliance with the China V standard. Designed by DuPont, the STRATCO® alkylation technology is the established global leader in the industry with over 90 units licensed worldwide and more than 850,000 BPSD (33,300 kmta) of installed capacity. For more than 80 years, the STRATCO® technology has helped refineries safely produce cleaner-burning fuel with high octane, low Rvp, low sulfur and zero olefins. Construction of the new 7,700-bpsd (300-kmta) alkylation unit is expected to begin in early 2017 with TPCC aiming for start-up by late 2017 or early 2018. TPCC is the largest oil refiner in North China with primary crude oil processing capacity of 15.5 million tons per year. The STRATCO® alkylation unit will be designed to meet TPCC’s requirements and will include the latest innovations from DuPont, which provide superior product quality, reduced catalyst consumption and reduced utility requirements. Along with the license and engineering package, DuPont also will provide proprietary equipment and operator training/commissioning assistance for the alkylation unit. Kevin Bockwinkel, global business manager for the STRATCO® alkylation technology said, “We look forward to working with Sinopec and TPCC and enhancing our strong relationship with the addition of a STRATCO® alkylation unit at Tianjin. The new unit will enable the refinery to produce clean fuel safely and reliably while improving the overall gasoline pool quality. We have STRATCO® alkylation units operating at almost 100 locations around the world – with some in operation since the 1940s, so we value Sinopec’s commitment to utilizing best-in-class technology.” The STRATCO® alkylation technology is licensed and marketed by DuPont as part of its Clean Technologies portfolio in Overland Park, Kan. DuPont is committed to alkylation research and has extensive experience in assisting refiners with alkylation design, start-ups, test runs, troubleshooting, optimization, revamps, expansions, analytical testing, operator training, turnarounds and HAZOP studies. The STRATCO® Contactor™ reactor is the key to the technology’s superior product quality, reliability and operability. DuPont continuously produces improvements in the design of the Contactor™ reactor with the most recent being the patented XP2 technology. The DuPont Clean Technologies division applies real-world experience, history of innovation, problem-solving success, and strong brands to help organizations operate safely and with the highest level of performance, reliability, energy efficiency and environmental integrity. The Clean Technologies portfolio includes STRATCO® alkylation technology for production of clean, high-octane gasoline; IsoTherming® hydroprocessing technology for desulfurization of motor fuels; MECS® sulfuric acid production and regeneration technologies; BELCO® air quality control systems for FCC flue gas scrubbing, other refinery scrubbing applications and marine exhaust gas scrubbing; MECS® DynaWave® technology for sulfur recovery and tail gas-treating solutions; and a comprehensive suite of aftermarket service and solutions offerings. Learn more about DuPont Clean Technologies at http://www.cleantechnologies.dupont.com. DuPont (NYSE: DD) has been bringing world-class science and engineering to the global marketplace in the form of innovative products, materials and services since 1802. The company believes that by collaborating with customers, governments, NGOs and thought leaders we can help find solutions to such global challenges as providing enough healthy food for people everywhere, decreasing dependence on fossil fuels, and protecting life and the environment. For additional information about DuPont and its commitment to inclusive innovation, please visit http://www.dupont.com. The DuPont Oval Logo, DuPont™ and all products denoted with ® or ™ are registered trademarks or trademarks of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company or its affiliates.


News Article | March 30, 2016
Site: www.greencarcongress.com

Just over three months after the authorities lifted the four-decade ban on crude oil exports, the US has actually exported less this year than it did over the same period the year before, when the ban was still in place. According to Clipper Data market intelligence cited by the Financial Times, we’ve seen a 5 percent decline in U.S. crude oil export volumes since the beginning of this year. The data suggests that on average we are exporting (waterborne) 325,000 barrels per day now, compared to 342,000 barrels per day during the first months of 2015. And there’s no official data yet—not since the beginning of this year, when the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) noted that during the week ending 22 January, the U.S. had exported just shy of 400,000 barrels of oil, which again was 25 percent less than what was exported for the same week in 2014. An oil tanker that reached a French port in January was the first post-ban delivery of U.S. crude oil, but things haven’t really picked up pace since then. January’s cargoes, totaling about 11.3 million barrels, marked a 7 percent decline from U.S. crude exports in December, according to data by the U.S. Census Bureau. Shipments during January went to Curacao and France, in addition to Canada, the primary destination. The total number of tankers that have set sail with U.S. crude oil will not be known until comprehensive data on February’s shipments is released by the U.S. Census Bureau. The immediate beneficiaries of the ban suspension are gas and oil companies such as Chevron and Exxon Mobil—among the most tireless lobbyers against the ban—and oil trading giants such as Vitol Group BV and Trafigura Ltd Pet. Europe and Asia are flooded with oil from Russia and the Middle East, though the first two shipments to leave the U.S. post-export ban went to Europe: one to Germany and the other to France, to be used in a refinery in Switzerland. Dutch media outlets reported in January that a tanker from Houston had reached Rotterdam port, but this remains just a drop in the global export bucket. In Asia, even China’s state-run Sinopec—the world’s second-largest refiner—has imported a consignment of U.S. oil, according to a Reuters source. Japan’s Cosmo Oil was the first Asian buyer of U.S. oil, purchasing some 300,000 barrels of U.S. crude in mid-January, which will be delivered to its refineries in mid-April. The very first South American country that will import U.S. crude oil is Venezuela. In early February, Venezuela’s state-run oil company PDVSA imported a 550,000-barrel cargo of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) through its U.S.-based Citgo Petroleum affiliate. Venezuela started importing foreign crudes in 2014 amid a fall in its own production—buying mostly Angolan and Nigerian light grades. WTI is also expected to be exported to Israel, where Swiss commodities house Trafigura will ship some 700,000 barrels. Atlantic Trading & Marketing, the U.S. trading unit of French Total SA, has been planning an export cargo of U.S. crude from Cushing. Also, earlier this month, Exxon became the first U.S. oil company to export U.S. crude, sending a tanker from Texas to a refinery it owns in Italy. However, storage is now at the highest level in at least a decade. U.S., crude storage levels hit 487 million barrels in early November, closing in on the 80-year high of 518 million barrels in the last week of February. According to the EIA, about 60 percent of the U.S. working storage capacity is filled. Globally, the picture isn’t much better, with the International Energy Agency (IEA) saying that 1 billion barrels were added to storage in 2015 alone. OPEC has reported that crude oil stockpiles in OECD countries currently exceed the running five-year average by 210 million barrels.


News Article | August 31, 2016
Site: www.nature.com

In a world of mobile devices, incremental improvements in the size, sustainability and efficiency of battery technology can have considerable economic ramifications. The global battery market is forecast to be worth US$120 billion a year by 2019, and the competition to lead the science is fierce. Chemist Jun Chen knows this well. His group at Nankai University in Tianjin attracted attention after it successfully created a rechargeable sodium–carbon dioxide battery in late 2015 ( et al. Angew. Chem. 55, 6482–6486; 2016). In principle, Na–CO batteries are more energy efficient than lithium-based rechargeable power packs, as well as cheaper because of the abundance of sodium and CO . But the performance of previous Na–CO batteries had been disappointing: the electrochemical reaction caused solid deposits to form on the cathode, preventing recharge. Chen's team overcame this by creating a cathode from a 3D carbon nanotube structure. The result was a battery with an energy density more than five times that of the lithium (Li)-ion batteries, widely used in mobile devices and nickel–metal hydride batteries, and with the ability to be recharged 200 times without any reduction in storage capacity. Chen is the chief investigator for energy conversion and storage research at the Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (CICCSE), a partnership between Nankai University and Tianjin University. The government-funded centre is designed to link science with industry for the benefit of the economy, and is one of 38 collaborative innovation centres (CICs) established across the country since 2012. CICCSE is now home to 385 researchers drawn from academia and industry, most of whom are affiliated with the 2 universities. In response to a weakening low-cost manufacturing market, in 2011 then-Chinese president Hu Jintao's pushed to embed science in the Chinese economy. He called for greater collaboration between the country's top research groups and between science and industry. The CICs grew out of what became known as the 2011 Plan, and focus on fields ranging from aerospace and quantum technology to medicine and advanced materials. The links formed can be domestic or international and are frequently both. By exploiting the multidisciplinary nature of universities, the centres are intended to overcome some of the challenges to innovation that remain in China, including scattered resources and inefficient research planning. Jiannian Yao, a director of CICCSE and vice-president of China's science funding body for competitive grants, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, says that the centres foster cooperation between researchers and strengthen national innovation capacity and competitiveness. Yao compares the centres to other government-led collaborations such as the Australian Research Council's Centres of Excellence, Millennium Science Initiative in South America and Japan's World Premier International Research Center Initiative. CICs with a focus on natural science and engineering also act as hubs for the promotion of industry partnerships. These centres receive generous funding from the government — the CICCSE receives around 50 million yuan (US$7.5 million) each year — as well as flexibility in the selection of research projects and the recruitment of scientists (unusual freedoms within government programmes in China, according to Chen). Cong Cao, a science-policy analyst at the University of Nottingham in Ningbo, says that the “new normal” of the Chinese economy, referring to slowed growth, means that the government has had to look to science and technology, with programmes such as the CICs, as the way to restore dynamism. In 2007, the Progress of Science and Technology Law was passed. The law, which is often referred to as the Chinese Bayh–Dole Act — a celebrated 1980s US patent-rights law credited with accelerating US industrial innovation — enables the intellectual property generated by government-funded research to be commercialized by the research group that does the investigation. The law has made it much easier for research institutions such as Chen's to benefit from the work their researchers are doing. In the seven years after the enactment of the law, the number of domestic patents awarded to Chinese researchers increased more than five-fold. The legislation has also made research partnerships between universities and industry more attractive for both sides. Over the past four years in particular, Cao says, the Chinese government has introduced a range of policies “to emphasize innovation and reform of China's science and technology system to make it better and quicker to respond to demand from the economy”. This includes the launch of the thirteenth Five Year Plan in 2015, which put innovation in science and technology at the centre of China's development. And following Premier Li Keqiang's annual address to the National People's Congress in March, there have been further efforts to encourage co-operation between science and industry. Speaking to the 2,943 delegates in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, Li echoed what President Xi Jinping had outlined in the Five Year Plan, using the word 'innovation' more than 50 times. The speech also included promises of new national science and technology programmes and science centres. By 2020, said Li, science and technology will account for 60% of the nation's economic growth. “We will implement the strategy of innovation-driven development, see that science and technology become more deeply embedded in the economy, and improve the overall quality and competitiveness of the real economy,” Li said. The government promised tax deductions for companies undertaking research and development; and, since the speech, it has begun efforts to substantially reduce the notorious red tape associated with government funding for research and to increase the income that Chinese scientists can receive for working on government-funded projects. Back at the CICCSE, Chen and his colleagues have secured a Chinese patent on their battery technology, one of 339 patents awarded to the centre's projects up until the end of 2015. They are now working on adjustments to scale the technology up and overcome the need for a pure CO environment. Chen expects to have an improved version in production in about two years. Chen's group is also collaborating with Tianjin-based Li-ion battery developer Lishen and with electronics manufacturer Samsung, on improvements to Li-ion batteries for devices such as electric cars. The CICCSE, like other centres, works with industry in three ways: companies are founding members of the centres and are represented on the board, Chinese petroleum giant Sinopec and the Tianjin Bohai Chemical Industry Group both have representatives on the CICCSE board, for example; the centre's researchers do joint research with industry on major national issues; and the companies fund research projects. Sinopec is currently funding research to improve hydrogen production for use in fuel processing and the chemical industry. The project is using nanofabrication techniques to increase the stability of nickel-based catalysts, which are used in the methane-steam reforming process to create hydrogen. The greater stability increases the efficiency so that alternative fuels such as ethanol can be used. The hydrogen can then be used to refine petroleum, particularly heavier crude oils. When complete, Sinopec will implement the new technology in a number of its fuel-processing plants. Yao says that another project has already seen crystallization technology developed by CICCSE researchers adopted by the pharmaceutical industry and increase revenue by nearly 4 billion yuan. Despite such success stories, there is concern that science is not yet playing a part in the Chinese economy in the way that Hu Jintao had hoped. There have been lots of the incremental improvements, but not yet an innovation that changes the market. Initiatives aimed at encouraging more innovation are beginning to show signs of success. The government says that there are now at least 81 million people in China who work in science and technology. But researchers and analysts say there is no guarantee that even successful programmes will continue without substantial change. Cong says that the nature of Chinese science policy means that change is never far away. Based on Li's statements at the 2016 National People's Congress, the 38 CICs are unlikely to be immune. The Ministry of Education may already be trying to put the premier's words into practice, says Cong. This means that “there could soon be different programmes put into place”, he says. For now the CICCSE is still receiving strong support from the ministry, which is responsible for the CIC programme. But Yao agrees that there is a risk that new policies, such as those put forward at this year's National People's Congress, and President Xi Jinping's efforts to create his own policy legacy, could mean the programme is superseded or significantly altered in coming years. This may not signal an end to the support for existing centres, but it could mean the central government introduces an updated version, perhaps rebranding the CICs as national laboratories. “The assessment of CICs should focus on how well the expected objectives are achieved; in other words, how well the centres address the major issues in science, technology and economic development,” says Yao. Yao is confident about CICCSE's future. By the end of 2015, he points out, the centres' researchers boasted not only hundreds of patents but also 295 contributions to high-quality journals. The move towards better collaboration between academics and industry in the hope of creating stronger links between science and economic and social needs has been occurring around the world over the past decade. After less than five years, it is still early days for China's experiment. But signs indicate that the country is on a promising path.


News Article | November 30, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

The new research report on Petroleum Market offered by DecisionDatabases.com provides Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast Till 2022. The report on global petroleum market evaluates the growth trends of the industry through historical study and estimates future prospects based on comprehensive research done by the analysts. The study extensively provides the market share, growth, trends and forecasts for the period 2016-2022. The market size in terms of volume (Mn bbl) and revenue (USD MN) is calculated for the study period along with the details of the factors affecting the market growth (drivers and restraints). A glimpse of the major drivers and restraints affecting this market is mentioned below: B. Restraints > Strict government regulation associated with environment > Exhausting resources > Presence of substitute The comprehensive value chain analysis of the market will assist in attaining better product differentiation, along with detailed understanding of the core competency of each activity involved. The market attractiveness analysis provided in the report aptly measures the potential value of the market providing business strategists with the latest growth opportunities. The report classifies the market into different segments based on type, processing, and application. The study incorporates periodic market estimates and forecasts at regional and country level. The report also covers the complete competitive landscape of the worldwide market with company profiles of key players such China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec Group), Phillips 66 Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Royal Dutch Shell, BP p.l.c., Total SA, Chevron Corporation and ConocoPhillips Co. A detailed description of each has been included, with information in terms of H.Q, future capacities, key mergers & acquisitions, financial overview, partnerships, collaborations, new product launches, new product developments and other latest industrial developments. SEGMENTATIONS IN THE REPORT:  1. By Types > Fuel Oil > Liquefied Petroleum Gas 2. By Processing > Upstream > Downstream > Pipeline > Marine 3. By Applications: > Oil Products > Natural Gas > Petrochemical > Lubricants 4. By Geography: > North America > Europe > Asia Pacific > Latin America > Middle East And Africa 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3. PETROLEUM MARKET ANALYSIS 4. PETROLEUM MARKET ANALYSIS BY TYPE 5. PETROLEUM MARKET ANALYSIS BY PROCESSING 6. PETROLEUM MARKET ANALYSIS BY APPLICATION 7. PETROLEUM MARKET ANALYSIS BY GEOGRAPHY 8. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE OF PETROLEUM MARKET COMPANIES 9. COMPANY PROFILES OF PETROLEUM MARKET INDUSTRY DecisionDatabases.com is a global business research reports provider, enriching decision makers and strategists with qualitative statistics. DecisionDatabases.com is proficient in providing syndicated research report, customized research reports, company profiles and industry databases across multiple domains. Our expert research analysts have been trained to map client’s research requirements to the correct research resource leading to a distinctive edge over its competitors. We provide intellectual, precise and meaningful data at a lightning speed.


Notes:  Sales, means the sales volume of High Tenacity Rayon  Revenue, means the sales value of High Tenacity Rayon This report studies sales (consumption) of High Tenacity Rayon in Global market, especially in USA, China, Europe, Japan, India and Southeast Asia, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering  Aditya Birla Group (India)  Grasim Industries Limited (India)  Jaya Shree Textiles (India)  Aksa Akrilik Kimya Sanayii A.S. (Turkey)  Asahi Kasei Fibers Corporation (Japan)  Barnhardt Manufacturing Company (US)  Celanese Corporation (US)  Crescent Textile Mills Ltd (Pakistan)  Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Japan)  DAK Americas LLC (US)  Eastman Chemical Company (US)  EI DuPont De Nemours & Co (US)  ES FiberVisions, Inc. (US)  Far Eastern New Century Corporation (Taiwan)  Formosa Plastics Group (Taiwan)  Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Taiwan)  Freudenberg Performance Materials (Germany)  Honeywell International Inc. (US)  Hyosung Corp. (South Korea)  Indorama Ventures Public Company Limited (Thailand)  INVISTA (US)  Kuraray Co., Ltd. (Japan)  Marzotto SpA (Italy)  Mitsubishi Rayon Co. Ltd. (Japan)  Montefibre SpA (Italy)  NatureWorks LLC (US)  Recron Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (Malaysia)  SASA Polyester Sanayi A.S. (Turkey)  Sinopec Yizheng Chemical Fiber Co. Ltd. (China)  Sinterama SpA (Italy)  Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of High Tenacity Rayon in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  USA  China  Europe  Japan  India  Southeast Asia  Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Type I  Type II  Type III  Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of High Tenacity Rayon in each application, can be divided into  Aerospace  Automobile  Manufacturing industry  Consumer goods Global High Tenacity Rayon Sales Market Report 2016  1 High Tenacity Rayon Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of High Tenacity Rayon  1.2 Classification of High Tenacity Rayon  1.2.1 Type I  1.2.2 Type II  1.2.3 Type III  1.3 Application of High Tenacity Rayon  1.3.1 Aerospace  1.3.2 Automobile  1.3.3 Manufacturing industry  1.3.4 Consumer goods  1.4 High Tenacity Rayon Market by Regions  1.4.1 USA Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.5 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of High Tenacity Rayon (2011-2021)  1.5.1 Global High Tenacity Rayon Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  1.5.2 Global High Tenacity Rayon Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global High Tenacity Rayon Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application  2.1 Global High Tenacity Rayon Market Competition by Manufacturers  2.1.1 Global High Tenacity Rayon Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016)  2.1.2 Global High Tenacity Rayon Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  2.2 Global High Tenacity Rayon (Volume and Value) by Type  2.2.1 Global High Tenacity Rayon Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  2.2.2 Global High Tenacity Rayon Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  2.3 Global High Tenacity Rayon (Volume and Value) by Regions  2.3.1 Global High Tenacity Rayon Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016)  2.3.2 Global High Tenacity Rayon Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016)  2.4 Global High Tenacity Rayon (Volume) by Application Make an enquiry before buying this Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/645729-global-high-tenacity-rayon-sales-market-report-2016


News Article | November 17, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes: Sales, means the sales volume of Acetone Revenue, means the sales value of Acetone This report studies sales (consumption) of Acetone in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering INEOS Phenol Mitsui Chemicals Sunoco Shell Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) Axiall Corporation Versalis - Eni Borealis AG Sinopec CNPC MP Biomedicals ABI Chem ZINC Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Acetone in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like United States China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into By destructive distillation of wood By distillation of calcium acetate By fermentation of corn products by selected bacteria By catalytic oxidation of isopropyl alcohol, cumene, or natural gas Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Acetone in each application, can be divided into Industry Uses Consumer Uses Application 3 Global Acetone Sales Market Report 2016 1 Acetone Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Acetone 1.2 Classification of Acetone 1.2.1 By destructive distillation of wood 1.2.2 By distillation of calcium acetate 1.2.3 By fermentation of corn products by selected bacteria 1.2.4 By catalytic oxidation of isopropyl alcohol, cumene, or natural gas 1.3 Application of Acetone 1.3.1 Industry Uses 1.3.2 Consumer Uses 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Acetone Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Acetone (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Acetone Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Acetone Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Acetone Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application 2.1 Global Acetone Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1.1 Global Acetone Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.1.2 Global Acetone Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.2 Global Acetone (Volume and Value) by Type 2.2.1 Global Acetone Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.2.2 Global Acetone Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.3 Global Acetone (Volume and Value) by Regions 2.3.1 Global Acetone Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.3.2 Global Acetone Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.4 Global Acetone (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of Acetone Table Classification of Acetone Figure Global Sales Market Share of Acetone by Type in 2015 Figure By destructive distillation of wood Picture Figure By distillation of calcium acetate Picture Figure By fermentation of corn products by selected bacteria Picture Figure By catalytic oxidation of isopropyl alcohol, cumene, or natural gas Picture Table Applications of Acetone Figure Global Sales Market Share of Acetone by Application in 2015 Figure Industry Uses Examples Figure Consumer Uses Examples Figure United States Acetone Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure China Acetone Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Europe Acetone Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Japan Acetone Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Acetone Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Acetone Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global Acetone Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Acetone Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Figure 2015 Acetone Sales Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Acetone Sales Share by Manufacturers Table Global Acetone Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Acetone Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table 2015 Global Acetone Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2016 Global Acetone Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global Acetone Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Acetone Sales Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Acetone by Type (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US @    Acetone Sales Global  Market Research Report 2016


Sunpower Records 74.4% Increase in Profit Attributable to Shareholders to RMB142.2 Million for FY2016 Mainboard-listed Sunpower Group Ltd. ("Sunpower" or "the Group"), a China-based heat transfer technology specialist engaged in the design, R&D and manufacture of energy-efficient and environmental protection equipment for diverse industries, reported growth in both its top and bottom line for the financial year ended 31 December 2016 ("FY2016"). Revenue grew 13.3% year-on-year ("yoy") to RMB1,626.2 million and profit attributable to shareholders surged 74.4% yoy to RMB142.2 million for FY2016. Financial Highlights ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RMB 'Million FY2016 FY2015 YoY % Change ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Revenue 1,626.2 1,435.3 13.3% Gross profit 408.3 320.2 27.5% Gross profit margin 25.1% 22.3% 2.8pp Profit attributable to shareholders 142.2 81.5 74.5% PATMI margin 8.7% 5.7% 3.0pp Earnings per share (RMB cents) ** 19.27 20.54 (6.2%) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- pp: percentage points ** Calculated based on weighted average of 737,657,000 ordinary shares for FY2016 and 396,679,000 shares for FY2015. - Revenue grew 13.3% yoy mainly due to higher contribution from the EPC Integrated Solutions Systems and Environmental Equipment Manufacturing segments. - Gross profit increased by 27.5% to RMB408.3 million for FY2016 from RMB320.2 million for FY2016. - Maintained track record of stable dividend, proposed a first and final dividend of SGD 0.0012 per share which equivalent to a payout ratio of around 3% for FY2016. - Successfully repositioned as an environmental protection services provider into anti- smog service section for centralized steam projects to provide recurring income in the long term. - CDH Fund as a strategic value-added investor that will not only inject capital but also provide institutional support for the Company's long term growth. The Group's revenue increased by 13.3% from RMB1,435.3 million for FY2015 to RMB1,626.2 million for FY2016, mainly due to the increase in revenue contribution from the Engineering Procurement and Construction ("EPC") Integrated Solutions segment of RMB152.6 million and Environmental Equipment Manufacturing ("EEM") segment of RMB38.8 million. Gross profit increased by approximately 27.5% from RMB320.2 million for FY2015 to RM402.5 million for FY2016. Gross profit margin increased from 22.3% for FY2015 to 25.1% for FY2016. Other operating income increased by RMB17.1 million largely due to government grant received and reversal of impairment allowance on trade and non-trade receivables of RMB21.9 million in FY2016. Administrative expenses increased by RMB13.0 million in FY2016 mainly due to full-year impact of employee share option expenses and personnel expenses in line with group's performance. As a result of the above, the Group's net profit attributed to shareholders surged 74.4% from RMB81.5 million for FY2015 to RMB142.2 million for FY2016. Net cash generated from operating activities amounted to approximately RMB430.0 million for FY2016 primarily due to movements in working capital. Working capital changes were mainly derived from increase in other receivables and other payables with decrease in trade payables, trade receivables, and inventories. Outlook China is still in the midst of implementing economic reforms and restructuring. The economy grew by 6.7% in 2016, marking the slowest growth for the past 25 years. China's economic development has entered into a "New Normal" phase of slower growth. With the latest development in the Chinese economy, a "New Normal" has been unfolding in China's environmental protection industry as well. Mr. Guo Hongxin, Chairman of the Sunpower Group comments, "Despite continued periods of volatility in the China market, we are pleased to announce an encouraging results for FY2016. FY2016 marks a significant milestone for the Group. We repositioned and our growth momentum in the green energy industry and anti-smog services sector for the centralised steam and electricity facility projects. EPC income from the centralised steam projects has contributed to the rise in revenue for the year. With the expected completion of the 3 centralized heating projects in first half of 2017, the recurring income is expected to be generated in FY2017. Meanwhile, we have CDH Fund as a strategic value-added investor that will not only inject capital but also provide institutional support for the Company's long term growth. Moving forward, the Group will continue efforts to maintain stable performance in its Environmental Equipment Manufacturing and Engineering Procurement and Construction business segments. Besides, we will also expand our Green Investment business segment via BOO, BOT or TOT business models by leveraging on the vast opportunities in the environmental protection related industry. These opportunities arose as a result of the encouraging policies implemented by the Chinese government such as the Energy Saving Plan during 13th Five-Year Plan Period. We will strive to optimize the income structure and improve shareholders' value." About Sunpower Group Limited PRC-based Sunpower Group Ltd. is a one-stop solution provider for energy conservation, waste-to-energy and renewable energy projects which specialise in the design, R&D and manufacture of energy conservation products in China. Its main businesses include environmental equipment manufacturing, EPC Integrated Solutions (flare-gas recovery system, Zero Liquid Discharge ("ZLD") system, photovoltaic power generation and petrochemical engineering) and Green investments with Build-Operate-Transfer ("BOT")/Transfer-Operate-Transfer ("TOT")/Build-Operate-Own ("BOO") models (centralized steam and electricity). Sunpower has a strong customer base which includes well-known international customers such as BASF, BP, Shell, SABIC, Dow Chemical, Alcoa and Mobil, and Chinese conglomerates such as China Petrochemical Corporation ("Sinopec"), China National Petroleum Corporation ("CNPC"), China National Offshore Oil Corporation ("CNOOC") and China Shenhua. For more information, please refer to: http://sunpower.com.cn/. Issued for and on behalf of Sunpower Group Ltd By Financial PR Pte Ltd For more information please contact: Yong Jing Wen, Ngo Yit Sung, Tel: +65 6438 2990 Fax: +65 6438 0064 Home | About us | Services | Partners | Events | Login | Contact us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | RSS


News Article | November 17, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

MarketStudyReport.com adds “Global Sodium Hydroxide Market by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2021” new report to its research database. The report spread across 116 pages with table and figures in it. Sodium hydroxide is also known as caustic soda, caustic, and lye. Anhydrous (100%, solid) caustic soda has a chemical formula of NaOH and a molecular weight of 40.00. Scope of the Report: This report focuses on the Sodium Hydroxide in Global market, especially in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa. This report categorizes the market based on manufacturers, regions, type and application. Market Segment by Manufacturers, this report covers Dow Chemical OxyChem Axiall Olin Corporation Formosa Plastics Corporation Tosoh Ineos Chlor Asahi Glass Covestro Shin-Etsu Chemical AkzoNobel Hanwha Chemical Solvay LG Chemical Tokuyama Corp SABIC Kemira Basf AdTechnologyya Birla Chemicals GACL ChemChina Xinjiang Zhongtai Chemical Xinjiang Tianye Shaanxi Beiyuan Group Shandong Jinling SP Chemical(Taixing) Shandong Haili Chemical Shandong Huatai Group Nantong Jiangshan Agrochemical & Chemicals Wanhua Chemical (Ningbo) Tangshan Sanyou Alkali Chloride Zhejiang Juhua Henan Shenma Chhlorine Alkali Sinopec Qilu Petrochemical Tianyuan Group Shandong Dadi Salt Chemical Befar Group Inner Mongolia Elion Chemical Shanghai Chlor-alkali Two Lions (Zhangjiagang) Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Technologyaly) Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) South America, Middle East and Africa Market Segment by Type, covers Liquid Caustic Soda Solid Caustic Soda Sodium Caustic Soda Market Segment by Applications, can be divided into Pulp and paper Textiles Soap and detergents Browse full table of contents and data tables at https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-sodium-hydroxide-market-by-manufacturers-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2021/ There are 13 Chapters to deeply display the global Sodium Hydroxide market. Chapter 1, to describe Sodium Hydroxide Introduction, product scope, market overview, market opportunTechnologyies, market risk, market driving force; Chapter 2, to analyze the top manufacturers of Sodium Hydroxide, wTechnologyh sales, revenue, and price of Sodium Hydroxide, in 2015 and 2016; Chapter 3, to display the competTechnologyive sTechnologyuation among the top manufacturers, wTechnologyh sales, revenue and market share in 2015 and 2016; Chapter 4, to show the global market by regions, wTechnologyh sales, revenue and market share of Sodium Hydroxide, for each region, from 2011 to 2016; Chapter 5, 6, 7 and 8, to analyze the key regions, wTechnologyh sales, revenue and market share by key countries in these regions; Chapter 9 and 10, to show the market by type and application, wTechnologyh sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2011 to 2016; Chapter 11, Sodium Hydroxide market forecast, by regions, type and application, wTechnologyh sales and revenue, from 2016 to 2021; Chapter 12 and 13, to describe Sodium Hydroxide sales channel, distributors, traders, dealers, appendix and data source. To receive personalized assistance write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150


This report studies sales (consumption) of Petroleum Coke in Global market, especially in USA, China, Europe, Japan, India and Southeast Asia, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Shell Valero Energy ConocoPhillips MPC Asbury Carbons ExxonMobil Aminco Resource Carbograf British Petroleum Ferrolux Mitsubishi Sumitomo Nippon Coke& Engineering Indian Oil Atha Essar Oil Minmat Ferro Alloys Rain CII Reliance Aluminium Bahrain Saudi Aramco Sinopec CNPC CNOOC CPC Landbridge Group Shaanxi Coal and Chem Luqing Petrochemical View Full Report With Complete TOC, List Of Figure and Table: http://globalqyresearch.com/global-petroleum-coke-sales-market-report-2016 Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Petroleum Coke in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like USA China Europe Japan India Southeast Asia Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Petroleum Coke in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Petroleum Coke Sales Market Report 2016 1 Petroleum Coke Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Petroleum Coke 1.2 Classification of Petroleum Coke 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Petroleum Coke 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Petroleum Coke Market by Regions 1.4.1 USA Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Petroleum Coke (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Petroleum Coke Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Petroleum Coke Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 9 Global Petroleum Coke Manufacturers Analysis 9.1 Shell 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Type I 9.1.2.2 Type II 9.1.3 Shell Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Valero Energy 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 120 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Type I 9.2.2.2 Type II 9.2.3 Valero Energy Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 ConocoPhillips 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 141 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Type I 9.3.2.2 Type II 9.3.3 ConocoPhillips Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 MPC 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Oct Product Type, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Type I 9.4.2.2 Type II 9.4.3 MPC Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Asbury Carbons 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Type I 9.5.2.2 Type II 9.5.3 Asbury Carbons Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 ExxonMobil 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 Type I 9.6.2.2 Type II 9.6.3 ExxonMobil Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 Aminco Resource 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Chemical & Material Product Type, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 Type I 9.7.2.2 Type II 9.7.3 Aminco Resource Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Carbograf 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 Type I 9.8.2.2 Type II 9.8.3 Carbograf Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 British Petroleum 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.9.2.1 Type I 9.9.2.2 Type II 9.9.3 British Petroleum Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Ferrolux 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.10.2.1 Type I 9.10.2.2 Type II 9.10.3 Ferrolux Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.11 Mitsubishi 9.12 Sumitomo 9.13 Nippon Coke& Engineering 9.14 Indian Oil 9.15 Atha 9.16 Essar Oil 9.17 Minmat Ferro Alloys 9.18 Rain CII 9.19 Reliance 9.20 Aluminium Bahrain 9.21 Saudi Aramco 9.22 Sinopec 9.23 CNPC 9.24 CNOOC 9.25 CPC 9.26 Landbridge Group 9.27 Shaanxi Coal and Chem 9.28 Luqing Petrochemical Global QYResearch ( http://globalqyresearch.com/ ) is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.


MarketStudyReport.com adds “Global Vinyl Acetate Sales Market Report 2016” new report to its research database. The report spread across 129 pages with table and figures in it. This report studies sales (consumption) of Vinyl Acetate in Global market, especially in USA, China, Europe, Japan, India and Southeast Asia, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Browse full table of contents and data tables at https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-vinyl-acetate-sales-market-report-2016/ Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Vinyl Acetate in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Vinyl Acetate in each application, can be divided into 9 Global Vinyl Acetate Manufacturers Analysis 9.1 Calanese Corporation 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Vinyl Acetate Product Type, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Type I 9.1.2.2 Type II 9.1.3 Calanese Corporation Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Arkema 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 129 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Type I 9.2.2.2 Type II 9.2.3 Arkema Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 DOW 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 144 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Type I 9.3.2.2 Type II 9.3.3 DOW Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 BASF 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Sept Product Type, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Type I 9.4.2.2 Type II 9.4.3 BASF Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Clariant 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Type I 9.5.2.2 Type II 9.5.3 Clariant Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Dupont 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 Type I 9.6.2.2 Type II 9.6.3 Dupont Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 Kuraray 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Chemical & Material Product Type, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 Type I 9.7.2.2 Type II 9.7.3 Kuraray Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Wacker 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 Type I 9.8.2.2 Type II 9.8.3 Wacker Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 Infineum International 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.9.2.1 Type I 9.9.2.2 Type II 9.9.3 Infineum International Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Exxon Mobil Corporation 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 9.10.2.1 Type I 9.10.2.2 Type II 9.10.3 Exxon Mobil Corporation Vinyl Acetate Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.11 Nippon Synthetic Chemical 9.12 Innospec Inc. 9.13 Lyondellbasell 9.14 Sinopec Corporation 9.15 Crown Chemical 9.16 Adarsh Chemicals 9.17 Millennium Inorganic Chemicals 9.18 Saudi International Petrochemical Company 9.19 Viraj Industries 9.20 Joyce Lub and Chem 9.21 Al Alameen Ltd. 9.22 S.S.M. Company To receive personalized assistance write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150


This report studies sales (consumption) of Petroleum Coke in United States market, focuses on the top players, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player, covering Shell Valero Energy ConocoPhillips MPC Asbury Carbons ExxonMobil Aminco Resource Carbograf British Petroleum Ferrolux Mitsubishi Sumitomo Nippon Coke& Engineering Indian Oil Atha Essar Oil Minmat Ferro Alloys Rain CII Reliance Aluminium Bahrain Saudi Aramco Sinopec CNPC CNOOC CPC Landbridge Group Shaanxi Coal and Chem Luqing Petrochemical View Full Report With Complete TOC, List Of Figure and Table: http://globalqyresearch.com/united-states-petroleum-coke-market-report-2016 Split by product types, with sales, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Petroleum Coke in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 United States Petroleum Coke Market Report 2016 1 Petroleum Coke Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Petroleum Coke 1.2 Classification of Petroleum Coke 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Petroleum Coke 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 United States Market Size Sales (Value) and Revenue (Volume) of Petroleum Coke (2011-2021) 1.4.1 United States Petroleum Coke Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.4.2 United States Petroleum Coke Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 5 United States Petroleum Coke Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 5.1 Shell 5.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 5.1.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.1.2.1 Type I 5.1.2.2 Type II 5.1.3 Shell Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.2 Valero Energy 5.2.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.2.2.1 Type I 5.2.2.2 Type II 5.2.3 Valero Energy Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.3 ConocoPhillips 5.3.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.3.2.1 Type I 5.3.2.2 Type II 5.3.3 ConocoPhillips Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.4 MPC 5.4.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.4.2.1 Type I 5.4.2.2 Type II 5.4.3 MPC Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.5 Asbury Carbons 5.5.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.5.2.1 Type I 5.5.2.2 Type II 5.5.3 Asbury Carbons Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.6 ExxonMobil 5.6.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.6.2.1 Type I 5.6.2.2 Type II 5.6.3 ExxonMobil Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.7 Aminco Resource 5.7.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.7.2.1 Type I 5.7.2.2 Type II 5.7.3 Aminco Resource Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.8 Carbograf 5.8.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.8.2.1 Type I 5.8.2.2 Type II 5.8.3 Carbograf Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.9 British Petroleum 5.9.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.9.2.1 Type I 5.9.2.2 Type II 5.9.3 British Petroleum Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.10 Ferrolux 5.10.2 Petroleum Coke Product Type, Application and Specification 5.10.2.1 Type I 5.10.2.2 Type II 5.10.3 Ferrolux Petroleum Coke Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.11 Mitsubishi 5.12 Sumitomo 5.13 Nippon Coke& Engineering 5.14 Indian Oil 5.15 Atha 5.16 Essar Oil 5.17 Minmat Ferro Alloys 5.18 Rain CII 5.19 Reliance 5.20 Aluminium Bahrain 5.21 Saudi Aramco 5.22 Sinopec 5.23 CNPC 5.24 CNOOC 5.25 CPC 5.26 Landbridge Group 5.27 Shaanxi Coal and Chem 5.28 Luqing Petrochemical Global QYResearch ( http://globalqyresearch.com/ ) is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.


News Article | February 15, 2017
Site: www.marketwired.com

DUBLIN, IRELAND--(Marketwired - Feb. 15, 2017) - Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:FO)(AIM:FOG)(ESM:FAC) is pleased to announce that Origin Energy Resources Limited ("Origin"), Falcon's 35% joint venture partner, has submitted the Results of Evaluation of the Discovery and Preliminary Estimate of Petroleum in Place for the Amungee NW-1H Velkerri B Shale Gas Pool ("Report") to the Northern Territory Government. The submission follows the completion of extended production testing at the Amungee NW-1H exploration well of the "B Shale" member of the Middle Velkerri Formation. In addition, Origin undertook a resource study based on the Amungee NW-1H well results and other key wells in the Beetaloo Basin including regional seismic data to determine a 2C contingent gas resource estimate for the Middle Velkerri B Shale Pool within EP76, EP98 and EP117. The Report was submitted in compliance with Section 64 of the Northern Territory Petroleum Act (2016) and as per the Reporting a Petroleum Discovery Guideline. The Report follows the initial submission of the notification of discovery and an initial report on discovery in October 2016. The Report provides the following volumetric estimates and recovery / utilisation factor for the B Shale member of the Middle Velkerri Formation within permits EP76, EP98, and EP117. Understanding the factors controlling deliverability and recovery as well as spatial variation within the gas play/shale pool are in their infancy. A quantitative assessment of the aggregated estimated recoverable resource of the gas play that can handle these complexities will require a statistically significant number of wells testing the gas play. As there is only a single production test within the gas play Origin decided upon a qualitative assessment approach instead to estimate the technically recoverable resource. Factors considered in the qualitative assessment of technically recoverable hydrocarbon resource in the gas play were the SRV recovery factor range, the subsurface utilization factor range and surface utilization factor range. Origin's Contingent Gas Resource Estimates for the Middle Velkerri B Shale Pool within EP76, EP98 and EP117 Origin has prepared a contingent gas resource estimate using probabilistic methods and reservoir evaluation data, in addition to regional seismic data. As noted in Origin's press release the "The contingent resource estimates contained in [their] report are based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation that have been prepared by Alexander Côté who is a full-time Origin employee and a Qualified Reserves and Resource Evaluator. Mr Côté is a registered professional engineer with specialised unconventional gas resource characterisation and development experience. Mr Côté has consented to the form and context in which these statements appear". Mr Côté is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta. On 14 September 2016, the Northern Territory Government introduced a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, and subsequently established an independent scientific inquiry. Pending the outcome of this independent inquiry, Origin has requested a suspension of all drilling operations with the DPIR. We await their formal response to the request. "The submission of a discovery evaluation report supporting the existence of a material gas resource in the Beetaloo Basin coupled with Origin's best estimate assessment of a gross contingent gas resource of 6.6 TCF for the Middle Velkerri B shale pool surrounding and adjacent to the Amungee NW-1H exploration well are exciting developments for Falcon. Additional exploration and appraisal activity will be required to refine the pool size and better assess the recoverable resource range and ultimately the commerciality of the play. However, it is interesting to note that in Origin's opinion the Marcellus and Barnett Shales in the USA are analogous, commercially-productive fields that are similar to the Middle Velkerri B Shale reservoir." Please refer to Appendix A for a copy of Origin's ASX/Media Release "Beetaloo Basin drill results indicate material gas resource". This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of Regulation 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Further information relating to disclosure of resources Certain information in this press release may constitute forward-looking information. Any statements that are contained in this news release that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "intend", "plan", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "projects", "potential", "scheduled", "forecast", "outlook", "budget", "hope", "support" or the negative of those terms or similar words suggesting future outcomes. This information is based on current expectations that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Such information may include, but is not limited to, comments made with respect to the type, number, schedule, stimulating, testing and objectives of the wells to be drilled in the Beetaloo basin Australia, the prospectivity of the Middle Velkerri play and the prospect of the exploration programme being brought to commerciality, risks associated with the introduction of a moratorium, fluctuations in market prices for shale gas; risks related to the exploration, development and production of shale gas reserves; general economic, market and business conditions; substantial capital requirements; uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and resources; extent of, and cost of compliance with, government laws and regulations and the effect of changes in such laws and regulations; the need to obtain regulatory approvals before development commences; environmental risks and hazards and the cost of compliance with environmental regulations; aboriginal claims; inherent risks and hazards with operations such as mechanical or pipe failure, cratering and other dangerous conditions; potential cost overruns; variations in foreign exchange rates; competition for capital, equipment, new leases, pipeline capacity and skilled personnel; the failure of the holder of licenses, leases and permits to meet requirements of such; changes in royalty regimes; failure to accurately estimate abandonment and reclamation costs; inaccurate estimates and assumptions by management and their joint venture partners; effectiveness of internal controls; the potential lack of available drilling equipment; failure to obtain or keep key personnel; title deficiencies; geo-political risks; and risk of litigation. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive and that these factors and risks are difficult to predict. Actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. Falcon assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those reflected in the forward looking-statements unless and until required by securities laws applicable to Falcon. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is contained in Falcon's filings with the Canadian securities regulators, which filings are available at www.sedar.com, including under "Risk Factors" in the Annual Information Form. This announcement has been reviewed by Dr. Gábor Bada, Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd's Head of Technical Operations. Dr. Bada obtained his geology degree at the Eötvös L. University in Budapest, Hungary and his PhD at the Vrije Aniversiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. He is a member of AAPG and EAGE. Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd is an international oil & gas company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of conventional and unconventional oil and gas assets, with the current portfolio focused in Australia, South Africa and Hungary. Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd is incorporated in British Columbia, Canada and headquartered in Dublin, Ireland with a technical team based in Budapest, Hungary. For further information on Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. please visit www.falconoilandgas.com Origin Energy (ASX:ORG) is the leading Australian integrated energy company with market leading positions in energy retailing (approximately 4.3 million customers), power generation (approximately 6,000 MW of capacity owned and contracted) and natural gas production (1,093 PJ of 2P reserves and annual production of 82 PJe). To match its leadership in the supply of green energy, Origin also aspires to be the number one renewables company in Australia. Through Australia Pacific LNG, its incorporated joint venture with ConocoPhillips and Sinopec, Origin is developing Australia's biggest CSG to LNG project based on the country's largest 2P CSG reserves base. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. To view Appendix A - Origin's ASX/Media Release, please visit the following link:


News Article | February 26, 2017
Site: news.yahoo.com

Most of the homes in Xiong, Hebei in China are heated by geothermal energy from well as deep as 1,500 metres (AFP Photo/Fred DUFOUR) Baoding (China) (AFP) - Chinese state-run energy giant Sinopec has drilled hundreds of wells across the country without finding a single drop of oil. But that was precisely the point: instead of black gold, the almost mile deep holes are providing clean heat for local homes. While two-thirds of China's electricity is generated by coal, almost all of the homes in northern Hebei province's Xiong district -- home to 400,000 people -- are heated by wells as deep as 1,500 metres (5,000 feet). In a new apartment in the district, a 60-year-old retiree watched his granddaughters hop about in bare feet, impervious to the frost outside. "This floor heating works like a dream," said Li Fuzeng. "And they say it's clean energy." The temperature inside his home was 28 degrees Celsius (82 degrees Fahrenheit) and a citrus tree in the corner showed no signs of winter. Chen Menghui, director of Sinopec's geothermal branch in Hebei, said the process depends on a cycle of running water. "These underground wells are pumped with water, which comes out at a temperature of around 70 C before flowing into the heating system," he said. Though experts say there is immense potential in China's subterranean heat reserves, they remain largely unexploited, accounting for less than 0.5 percent of the Asian giant's energy consumption. Sinopec's geothermal projects in China make up for more than 40 percent of the total number of homes heated by geothermal energy in the country, making them a potential model for how it can tap this resource. Before launching itself into the geothermal industry, Sinopec found an unusual partner in the Icelandic company Arctic Green Energy. Sinopec needed technical support and Iceland is regarded as the leader in extracting energy from the ground. In a joint venture beginning in 2009, they invested 400 million yuan ($58 million) into the Xiong project, where they drilled almost 70 wells. The idea was to apply the technology that had already been tested in the Nordic country to northern China. "Iceland, on the mid-Atlantic ridge, has exceptional resources, with temperatures exceeding 250 C -- hot enough to supply power plants," said Wang Yanxin, a geological research officer at Sinopec. "In China, with the exception of Sichuan and Tibet, there are hardly any temperatures exceeding 150 C, which forces us to concentrate on heating systems," he added. Sinopec, which has suffered in recent years from the tumble in oil prices and the slowdown of the Chinese economy, appears to be investing further in renewable energy, including solar and wind, as well as geothermal. The company has geothermal facilities in 16 Chinese provinces, allowing it to heat some 40 million square metres of homes and factories -- and avoiding an estimated three million tonnes of CO2 emissions. One potential benefit of the project could be a significant reduction in local air pollution, a problem that has plagued much of northern China. According to Sinopec, Xiong has become China's first "smokeless town" by eliminating the coal-fired heating systems common throughout other parts of the country. The moniker is not entirely accurate, though. Although the city has done away with polluting furnaces, Li's neighbourhood is still regularly covered with a thick layer of pollution coming from surrounding industrial districts. Still, Sinopec aims to develop 20 such "smokeless cities" nationwide by 2020. The company's ambitions align with the ruling Communist Party's plan to significantly reduce air pollution in Chinese cities, in part by increasing the use of clean energy to replace carbon-based fuels. That goal includes a ten-fold increase in geothermal resources: growing electrical output to 530 megawatts by 2020 and tripling the floorspace of buildings heated by geothermal energy. Although it sounds like a big number, it would still be a drop in the bucket of overall Chinese electricity production (5.638 billion megawatts in 2014) and very modest compared to Iceland (close to 700 MW) or the United States (3,930 MW). Lin Boqiang, the director of the energy research centre at Xiamen University, is sceptical of the project. "It's clean, but compared to solar or wind, the cost of geothermal is incredibly high," he told AFP, questioning whether the project could survive without state support.


News Article | March 1, 2017
Site: www.businesswire.com

Paal Kibsgaard, président et DG de Schlumberger, a commenté : « La croissance de 1 % du chiffre d'affaires du quatrième trimestre en séquentiel est attribuable à une forte activité au Moyen-Orient et en Amérique du Nord, qui a largement été contrebalancée par une faiblesse continue en Amérique latine, ainsi que par une diminution de l'activité saisonnière en Europe, dans la CEI, et en Afrique. « Dans les différents segments d'activité, l'augmentation du chiffre d'affaires du quatrième trimestre a été menée par le groupe Production, qui a enregistré une croissance de 5 % en raison de la hausse de l'activité de fracturation hydraulique au Moyen-Orient et dans la partie terrestre de l'Amérique du Nord. Le chiffre d'affaires du groupe Caractérisation des réservoirs a augmenté de 1 % en séquentiel en raison de la forte activité de Tests & Traitement au Koweït, qui a compensé le déclin saisonnier de l'activité Wireline en Norvège et en Russie. Le chiffre d'affaires du groupe Forage est resté stable en séquentiel, dans la mesure où la poursuite d'une forte activité de forage directionnel en Amérique du Nord a été contrebalancée par des déclins d'activité dans les régions Europe/CEI/Afrique, ainsi qu'au Moyen-Orient et en Asie. Le chiffre d'affaires du groupe Cameron est également resté stable en séquentiel, avec une croissance de OneSubsea et des Systèmes de Surface qui a été contrebalancée par une réduction des ventes de produits Vannes & Mesures, ainsi que par un déclin du carnet de commandes des Systèmes de forage. « La marge d'exploitation avant impôts était essentiellement stable en séquentiel à 11,4 %, les améliorations de marge dans les groupes Production et Forage ayant été contrebalancées par les contractions observées dans les groupes Cameron et Caractérisation des réservoirs. Au cours des récents trimestres, nous sommes parvenus à stabiliser nos opérations du point de vue activité et capacité, et ceci nous a permis par la suite d'affiner et de réduire notre structure de soutien afin de refléter les niveaux de prix actuels en termes d'activité et de services. Ceci nous a permis d'enregistrer des frais de restructuration de 536 millions USD au quatrième trimestre. Nous avons également enregistré 139 millions USD de frais relatifs à l'intégration de Cameron et une perte de dévaluation monétaire en Égypte. « Nous maintenons notre vue constructive des marchés pétroliers, dans la mesure où la baisse de l’écart entre l'offre et la demande s'est poursuivie au quatrième trimestre, comme l'indique un prélèvement régulier des stocks de l'OCDE. Cette tendance a été renforcée par les accords OPEP et hors OPEP du mois de décembre visant à réduire la production, ce qui devrait, avec un certain décalage, accélérer le prélèvement des stocks, soutenir une augmentation supplémentaire des prix du pétrole, et engendrer une hausse des investissements en E&P. « Sur les marchés internationaux, les opérateurs se focalisent davantage sur les retours à cycle complet, et les investissements en E&P sont généralement régis par la génération de flux de trésorerie disponible des opérateurs. Dans cette optique, nous nous attendons à ce que la reprise des marchés internationaux en 2017 démarre plus lentement, en réponse à la réalité économique à laquelle est confronté le secteur E&P. Ceci aboutira probablement à une troisième année consécutive de sous-investissement, avec un faible taux continu d'autorisations de nouveaux projets et une accélération du déclin de la production dans la base de production vieillissante. Ces facteurs combinés viennent accroître la probabilité d'un déficit significatif de l'offre à moyen terme, qui ne pourra être évité qu'avec une hausse globale et généralisée des dépenses en E&P, qui devrait débuter à la fin de l'exercice 2017 et se prolongeant jusqu'en 2018. « Dans ce contexte et après neuf trimestres consécutifs de réductions d'effectifs, de réduction des coûts et d'efforts de restructuration incessants, nous sommes ravis de nous concentrer à nouveau sur la poursuite de la croissance et sur l'amélioration des rendements. En gérant cette baisse, nous avons rationalisé notre structure de coûts, continué de dynamiser l'efficience et la qualité de nos processus opérationnels, étendu notre offre en maintenant nos investissements en R&E, et procédé à une série d'acquisitions stratégiques. La combinaison de ces actions nous a permis de renforcer notre position de marché mondiale pendant la baisse d’activité, ce qui nous permettra de maintenir et d'étendre notre leadership bien établi en termes de marge et de bénéfice, à la fois en Amérique du Nord et dans tous les marchés internationaux à l'avenir. « À l'heure où la croissance du bénéfice demeure un moteur financier très important pour nous, la génération de trésorerie à cycle complet est encore plus critique, et c'est dans ce domaine que nous demeurons unique dans le secteur. Au cours des deux dernières années de baisse, nous avons généré 7,5 milliards USD de flux de trésorerie disponible, plus que le reste de nos principaux concurrents combinés. En outre, nous avons restitué 8,0 milliards USD à nos actionnaires par le biais de dividendes et de rachats d’actions. Ceci démontre clairement la robustesse à cycle complet de Schlumberger, la gestion attentive de notre entreprise, et la force de nos capacités d'exécution. » En Amérique du Nord, le chiffre d'affaires a augmenté de 4 % en séquentiel, en réponse à une augmentation de l'activité terrestre tandis que l'activité offshore a baissé. À l'exclusion des résultats du groupe Cameron, le chiffre d'affaires de l'activité terrestre a enregistré une croissance à deux chiffres favorisée par une forte activité de fracturation hydraulique due à une augmentation du nombre d'étapes, ainsi que par une plus forte participation des segments Forage & Mesures, Trépans & Outils de forage, et des produits et services M-I SWACO due à une augmentation des appareils de forage. Le chiffre d'affaires de dans la partie terrestre des Etats-Unis a également enregistré une croissance à deux chiffres due à une plus forte activité et à une légère reprise des prix, tandis que le chiffre d'affaires de l'Ouest canadien a enregistré une croissance solide due à une intensification de l'activité pendant l'hiver ainsi qu'à une augmentation des ventes de produits d'ascension artificielle. Le chiffre d'affaires a également augmenté grâce aux ventes de licences sismiques multiclients WesternGeco de fin d'année, qui étaient néanmoins réduites par rapport aux exercices précédents. Le chiffre d'affaires des segments Valves & Mesures et Systèmes de forage a diminué. Le chiffre d'affaires de la zone Moyen-Orient & Asie a augmenté de 5 % en séquentiel. Ceci s'explique principalement par une forte activité liée à la fracturation et aux Services de production intégrés (SPI) dans le cadre de développements de ressources terrestres non conventionnelles, ainsi que par une augmentation de la productivité des équipes sismiques terrestres en Arabie saoudite. Le chiffre d'affaires en Égypte a augmenté grâce à une plus forte activité de perforation, tandis qu'une croissance a été observée au Qatar grâce à davantage de travaux de diagraphie horizontale. Ces augmentations ont en revanche été partiellement contrebalancées par des diminutions des activités Forage & Mesures et Services de forage intégrés (SFI), ainsi que par de moindres ventes d'équipements sur le marché géographique de l'Inde, plusieurs projets ayant été achevés et plusieurs campagnes de puits retardées. Le chiffre d'affaires de la zone Amérique latine a diminué de 4 % en séquentiel, principalement sur le marché géographique Mexique & Amérique centrale, où les contraintes budgétaires des clients ont conduit à une nette diminution du nombre d'appareils de forage qui a impacté les opérations onshore et offshore, affectant les projets à la fois en eaux profondes et en eaux peu profondes. Le chiffre d'affaires du Mexique a également diminué à l'issue de fortes ventes de relevés marins et de licences sismiques multiclients au trimestre dernier. Le chiffre d'affaires de l'Argentine a diminué car les travaux de développement de ressources non conventionnelles ont été affectés par des conditions météorologiques défavorables et autres retards. Ces diminutions ont néanmoins été partiellement atténuées par une forte activité autour des forages et projets sur le marché géographique du Pérou, de Colombie et de l'Équateur, le nombre d'appareils de forage ayant augmenté de 46 % suite à l'augmentation des prix du pétrole. Le chiffre d'affaires de la zone Europe/CEI/Afrique a diminué de 2 % en séquentiel, principalement en raison de l'achèvement saisonnier du pic estival d'activité de forage en Russie ainsi que des campagnes de services d'exploration en Norvège, ce qui a impacté l'ensemble des Technologies, en premier lieu desquelles les activités Câbles, Forage & Mesures, et M-I SWACO. Le marché géographique d'Afrique sub-saharienne a contribué au déclin du chiffre d'affaires de la zone, à mesure de la démobilisation des appareils de forage ainsi que de l'achèvement de plusieurs projets, principalement en Angola et au Congo. Ces diminutions ont été partiellement compensées par une solide activité et exécution autour du projet OneSubsea. En Équateur, Schlumberger a fourni des SGI à Petroamazonas EP et à Sinopec, afin d'optimiser le forage au niveau du projet de Tiputini. Les technologies de coupe-tige compact en diamant cristallin (CDC) ONYX* et d'élément à diamant conique Stinger* de Trépans & Outils de forage ont permis une meilleure manœuvrabilité et stabilité, ainsi que des passages plus longs et plus rapides. Par ailleurs, le service de dispersion diélectrique multifréquences Wireline Dielectric Scanner* a mesuré directement les informations sur le volume d'eau et la texture des roches, tandis que le module Dual-Packer a permis d'isoler l'intervalle pour l'outil de test de dynamique de formation modulaire MDT*. En outre, les charges creuses de pénétration ultra-profonde PowerJet Nova* ont présenté une efficacité améliorée. Le client a réduit son temps total de forage à 7 jours et demi par rapport aux 11 jours prévus, soit une économie de coûts estimée à 250 000 USD. En Égypte, Belayim Petroleum Company (Petrobel), une coentreprise réunissant Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation et IEOC Production B.V., a confié à Schlumberger Tests & Traitement un contrat d'une valeur de 70 millions USD portant sur l'ingénierie, l'approvisionnement, la construction, la mise en service et l'exploitation d'une installation pour le gisement gazier Zohr. Cette installation, qui devrait être achevée dans un délai de 11 mois à compter de la date d'attribution du contrat, permettra une production gazière accélérée au cours de la première phase du projet. En outre, l'activité Test & Traitement a utilisé une combinaison de technologies pour Petrobel, afin d'achever un test de production du premier puits d'appréciation offshore de la découverte Zohr dans le bloc Shorouk. Fonctionnant à une profondeur d'eau de 1 450 m, la rame de forage de production comprenait un arbre de test sous-marin SenTREE 3*, combiné à la technologie de télémesure sans fil Muzic*, qui a activé l'échantillonnage de fluides de réservoir indépendant en ligne SCAR* et les systèmes de test de réservoir de fond Quartet*. L'utilisation du logiciel de collaboration et de contrôle des données en temps réel de tests des puits Testing Manager* a permis une analyse et optimisation transitoires en temps réel du programme de test de puits. Au large de la Norvège, le segment Câbles a introduit une combinaison de technologies permettant à Lundin Norway de surmonter une formation géologique difficile, et de réduire la durée de l'intervention dans un puits situé en mer de Barents. La présence potentielle d'importantes cavités non visibles via une imagerie sismique depuis la surface a nécessité l'utilisation d'une imagerie haute résolution à l'intérieur, autour et au-delà du puits de forage. Les technologies utilisées ont inclus le système hDVS de détection acoustique distribuée (DAS) recourant à un câble intégrant des fibres optiques, un vibrateur de fond de puits Z-Trac*, ainsi qu'un système polyvalent d'imagerie sismique VSI*, le tout dans un seul train de tige. Les données acquises grâce au vibrateur et au système d'imagerie de fond de puits ont permis au client de visualiser des dangers potentiels au-delà du trépan et de limiter les risques liés au forage. La technologie DAS a réduit la durée de l'intervention à 30 minutes, par rapport à une acquisition VSP conventionnelle qui peut nécessiter jusqu'à huit heures. Au large des Émirats arabes unis, le segment Test & Traitement a déployé une combinaison de technologies pour Al Hosn Gas, sur les gisements de Hail et de Gasha. Cette combinaison de technologies comprenait une tête électronique de perforation et de mise à feu guidée par un tube eFire-TCP* et une nouvelle technologie de corrélation de perforation, les deux utilisant la télémétrie sans fil Muzic*. La corrélation de profondeur sans fil correspondait à la méthode traditionnelle de localisateur de joint de tubage et à rayonnement gamma de Câbles. Par ailleurs, des données en temps réel en fond de puits ont permis de déterminer les propriétés du réservoir, d'évaluer la performance du puits pendant et après la stimulation, et d'appuyer les décisions relatives à l'échantillonnage de fond de puits afin de réduire de 18 heures le programme initial de test du puits. Le programme de transformation a permis à Schlumberger de réduire le nombre d'équipements et les coûts de réparation liés à la fiabilité des outils, en recourant à une gestion du cycle de vie technologique (TLM). En Arabie saoudite, par exemple, dans son Centre de fiabilité et d'efficience du Moyen-Orient (CFE) de Dhahran, Schlumberger a mis en œuvre un nouveau système de maintenance pour Tests & Services de traitement, qui a permis de réduire de 48 % le coût global de réparation des équipements et de réduire de 21 % les délais d'exécution au cours des trois premiers mois d'exploitation. En Australie, WesternGeco a déployé sa source d'énergie sismique marine nouvellement conçue eSource à bord de l' Amazon Conqueror, dans le cadre d'un levé multiclients. La méthodologie TLM améliore la fiabilité de sources sismiques de toutes les sources WesternGeco, y compris le projet eSource qui utilise une technique d'acquisition nécessitant une haute fiabilité de la source afin de garantir une efficience opérationnelle maximale. Entre 2014 et 2016, la fiabilité des sources de WesternGeco a augmenté de 47 %. Le chiffre d'affaires du groupe Forage, qui s'est élevé à 2,0 milliards USD et dont 76 % étaient attribuables aux marchés internationaux, est resté stable en séquentiel, la poursuite d'une forte activité de forage directionnel en Amérique du Nord ayant été contrebalancée par des déclins d'activité dans les zones Internationales. L'amélioration du chiffre d'affaires en Amérique du Nord s'explique par une plus forte participation des segments Forage & Mesures, Trépans & Outils de forage, ainsi que des produits et services M-I SWACO. La diminution du chiffre d'affaires dans les zones Internationales s'explique par l'achèvement de projets Forage & Mesures et de projets SFI en Inde et en Irak, tandis que le ralentissement hivernal en Russie et en Norvège a affecté l'activité Forage & Mesures ainsi que l'activité M-I SWACO. La marge d'exploitation avant impôts de 12 % a augmenté de 81 pdb en séquentiel malgré un chiffre d'affaires inchangé. Ceci était attribuable aux améliorations tarifaires liées à une plus grande participation des technologies de forage en réponse à une activité croissante dans la partie terrestre des Etats-Unis, qui a principalement concerné les segments Forage & Mesures et Trépans & Outils de forage. La marge a également progressé en réponse à l'exécution opérationnelle de SFI, M-I SWACO ainsi que Trépans & Outils de forage, et aux avantages liés à la transformation continue dans la mesure où les ressources ont été alignées pour correspondre à la courbe de la reprise. Dans la région du Conseil de coopération du Golfe (CCG), SFI a enregistré une amélioration de 40 % de la performance de forage au cours des trois premiers trimestres 2016 par rapport aux services de forage non intégrés dans des gisements similaires. Cette amélioration est basée sur le nombre de pieds forés par heure en dessous de la table de rotation. Cette réalisation a été favorisée par une combinaison de technologies de forage, telles que le système à taux de remontée élevé PowerDrive Archer* et le système rotatif orientable renforcé PowerDrive Xceed*, destinées optimiser les temps de forage dans des puits horizontaux et au cours de forages à portée étendue. Ceci comprenait l'utilisation de l'analyse d'efficience opérationnelle des forages multipuits RigHour*, ainsi que le logiciel d'optimisation du taux de pénétration ROPO*, qui ajuste les paramètres de forage pour maximiser la performance de forage au fond. Schlumberger a combiné ces technologies avec des flux de travail intégrés supervisés par des experts multidisciplinaires en Arabie saoudite et par les Centres d'intégration technologique de forage d'Abu Dhabi dans le but de réduire à la fois les coûts de forage et de développement global. En Norvège, Statoil a octroyé à Schlumberger un contrat de huit ans assorti de périodes optionnelles portant sur la fourniture de services intégrés de construction de puits pour l'une de ses plateformes auto-élévatrices Cat-J, qui a été conçue pour les opérations dans des environnements hostiles et des puits peu profonds du plateau continental norvégien. Schlumberger fournira des services de planification et d'exécution pour le forage directionnel, les mesures et la diagraphie en cours de forage, la diagraphie des fluides de forage, les fluides de complétion et de forage, la cimentation, le pompage, la récupération des fentes et le repêchage, la diagraphie par câble électrique, la gestion des déchets, la complétions, l'isolation mécanique des fonds de puits, le nettoyage mécanique des puits et la perforation acheminée par tubage pour le gisement satellite Gullfaks dont l'exploitation devrait débuter vers la fin de l'année. Dans le secteur norvégien de la mer du Nord, Forage & Mesures a utilisé le service de cartographie en cours de forage de réservoir GeoSphere* pour permettre à ExxonMobil de cartographier un réservoir injectite complexe et procéder efficacement à un forage assisté dans les sables cibles du gisement de Balder. En prenant en compte deux objectifs, éviter les trous de guidage coûteux dans les puits de développement qui ne parviennent généralement pas à fournir suffisamment d'informations pour placer les puits producteurs et éviter la mise en place du tubage dans des sables injectites fins, la technologie GeoSphere a cartographié la partie supérieure des sables massifs depuis une profondeur verticale totale de plus de 20 m en surface et a détecté le contact pétrole/eau tout en plaçant la section de puits de 12 ¼ po. avant de pénétrer le réservoir. S'agissant de la section de réservoir de 8 ½ po., le client a été en mesure de prévoir une stratégie de forage assisté au-devant du trépan en combinant les résultats d'interprétation sismique et de cartographie GeoSphere, et a donc amélioré la productivité des puits. Dans l'Ouest du Texas, Forage & Mesures a utilisé une combinaison de technologies et établi un nouveau record de performance de forage pour un opérateur du bassin Permien. L'ensemble de fond de puits comprenait les systèmes rotatifs orientables PowerDrive Orbit* pour optimiser le forage directionnel, ainsi qu'un moteur de forage haute performance DynaForce*, qui fournit la plus forte torsion au niveau du trépan et surpasse les moteurs conventionnels dans le forage à grand volume. En outre, le système MWD démontable SlimPulse* a fourni des mesures de direction, d'inclinaison, de face de coupe et de rayonnement gamma en temps réel pour la transmission d'impulsion par la boue. Le client a foré un puits latéral de 7 814 pieds en moins de 22 heures, surpassant de 47 % le record de métrage précédent du client dans le bassin Permien. Par conséquent, le client a réduit de 18 heures le temps de forage par rapport à un puits latéral précédent. En Égypte, le segment Forage & Mesures a utilisé le service de cartographie en cours de forage de réservoir GeoSphere* pour Belayim Petroleum Company (Petrobel), coentreprise entre Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation et IEOC Production B.V., dans le but d'éliminer un trou de guidage dans le gisement d'Abu Rudeis. Une non-conformité observée sur la partie supérieure des grès pétrolifères a dans un premier temps a nécessité un trou de guidage afin de déterminer la profondeur de tubage intermédiaire, tandis que les schistes pressurisés situés au-dessus de la zone cible a nécessité un poids de boue élevé qui a rendu difficile la pénétration du sable cible en raison des pertes potentielles liées à la circulation de la boue. La technologie GeoSphere a utilisé des mesures électromagnétiques directionnelles profondes pour révéler la stratification souterraine ainsi que les informations de contact des fluides à plus de 100 pieds du puits de forage, ce qui a permis de gérer l'incertitude géologique et le risque de forage. En éliminant le trou de guidage, le client a économisé environ 1,8 million USD. En Russie, Trépans & Outils de forage a utilisé une combinaison de technologies de trépans pour LLC LUKOIL-Komi, société affiliée de production de PAO LUKOIL, pour éliminer quatre passages de trépan et accroître le TDP d'un puits de limite du gisement de Kyrtaelskoye, dans la région Timan-Péchora. La technologie de coupe CDC rotative ONYX360* a augmenté la durabilité des trépans grâce à sa rotation à 360°, tandis que les éléments à diamant conique Stinger* ont fourni une résistance supérieure aux chocs et à l'usure dans cette formation sableuse dure et hautement abrasive. En outre, en raison de sa conception modulaire, le moteur orientable PowerPak* de Forage & Mesures a été adapté à l'environnement de forage. Par conséquent, le client a atteint un taux de pénétration moyen de 9,3 m/h, soit une augmentation de 40 % par rapport au taux de pénétration maximum atteint dans les puits de limite. En outre, le client a gagné cinq jours d'exploitation en forant la section de puits de 8 5/8 po. en 15 jours au lieu des 20 jours prévus. Dans le bassin du Neuquén, en Argentine, M-I SWACO a utilisé le fluide de forage à base d'eau en polymère renforcé KLA-SHIELD* pour permettre à Wintershall Argentina de forer un puits latéral de 3 281 pieds dans une formation problématique caractérisée par une pression interstitielle anormalement élevée, des fractures naturelles, des contraintes et une complexité géomécanique générale. Le système KLA-SHIELD optimisé par le lubrifiant STARGLIDE pour améliorer le TDP et par l'additif d'anti-accrétion améliorant le taux de pénétration DRILZONE a fourni une alternative aux fluides de forage non aqueux. En outre, le logiciel de simulation des fluides de forage VIRTUAL HYDRAULICS* a tracé la trajectoire du puits, effectué les simulations de torsion et d'entrave, évalué la rhéologie en termes de densité de circulation équivalente, et optimisé le nettoyage du puits. Le client en a bénéficié en forant le puits et le puits latéral en 70 jours, sans aucun problème d'éboulement, de gonflement, ou d'étroitesse du puits de forage. Le programme de transformation a permis d'améliorer la fiabilité et l'efficience, ainsi que la fourniture des produits et des services. Les équipes de conception, d'ingénierie et de maintenance de Forage & Mesures basées au CFE du Moyen-Orient à Dhahran, en Arabie saoudite, ont collaboré pour créer des logements modulaires renforcés destinés aux outils de mesure en cours de forage, et de réduire leur sensibilité au mouvement et à l'usure dans un environnement exposé à des chocs importants. Par conséquent, la fiabilité des outils de plateforme MWD intégrés ImPulse* a augmenté de 240 %, et la fiabilité des outils de service de neutrons à densité azimutale adnVISION* a augmenté de 47 % au cours des six premiers mois d'opération du CFE. Le chiffre d'affaires de 2,2 milliards USD du groupe Production, dont 72 % provenait des marchés internationaux, a grimpé de 5 % en séquentiel en réponse à une forte activité de fracturation dans le cadre de projets d'exploitation de ressources non conventionnelles dans la partie terrestre du Moyen-Orient, principalement en Arabie saoudite, ainsi qu'en Amérique du Nord où le nombre d'appareils de forage terrestres et de plateformes de fracturation a augmenté. Le chiffre d'affaires de la partie terrestre des Etats-Unis a augmenté à réponse au volume et à une légère reprise des prix. Le chiffre d'affaires de l'Ouest canadien a enregistré une croissance grâce à une intensification de l'activité pendant l'hiver et à l'augmentation des ventes de produits d'ascension artificielle. Le chiffre d'affaires de Cimentation a augmenté de 30 %, principalement en Amérique du Nord, tandis que celui des SPI a triplé, principalement dans les zones Internationales. La Kuwait Oil Company a octroyé à Schlumberger un contrat de fourniture et d'installation d'appareils de contrôle de débit entrant ResFlow*, qui seront utilisés dans des réservoirs de grès ainsi que dans un projet de développement de carbonate de 140 puits. La technologie ResFlow contribue à maintenir des taux de débit entrant uniformes sur l'ensemble de l'intervalle dans des complétions à découvert, même en présence de variations de perméabilité et de zones de perte. Ces deux projets de développement problématiques sur le plan technique nécessitent des équipements fiables capables de fonctionner dans des puits complexes afin de contrôler et de comprendre le comportement des réservoirs. En Chine, la division Services de puits a utilisé une combinaison de technologies pour la co-entreprise Schlumberger-CoPower pour surmonter les problèmes posés par un réservoir de gaz étroit sous-pressurisé dans le bassin d'Ordos. La technologie de fluide de fracturation à base de fibres FiberFRAC* a créé un réseau de fibres dans le fluide de fracturation, offrant un moyen mécanique de transport et de mise en place de l'agent de soutènement. En outre, le fluide composite de la gamme de services de complétion de réservoirs non conventionnels BroadBand* a permis de minimiser les filtrages potentiels et d'optimiser la distribution de l'agent de soutènement. Le client a atteint une production moyenne de près de 2 280 Mscf/j pour 11 puits, comparé à six puits de limite qui utilisaient des fluides de fracturation conventionnels et dont la production moyenne était de 812 Mscf/j. Aux Émirats arabes unis, la technique de fracturation de canal d'écoulement HiWAY* et le fluide de fracturation à base d'eau de mer UltraMARINE* de Services de puits ont été déployés dans un environnement offshore pour stimuler une roche mère à fortes contraintes et à faible perméabilité pour Dubai Petroleum. Huit travaux de fracturation utilisant un agent de soutènement ont été placés avec succès et plus d'un demi-million de livres ont été pompées. Ces huit travaux sont les premiers traitements de fracturation hydraulique de roche mère multiétagés offshore à être effectués dans le monde, et ont été achevés en 40 heures. En Amérique du Nord, la transformation a permis de réduire le coût de propriété des actifs et d'améliorer les efficiences opérationnelles pour Services de puits. Afin d'optimiser l'inventaire des matériaux et des stocks, une nouvelle organisation de Planification de l'approvisionnement a analysé les données de dépense pour garantir que les stocks disponibles soient suffisants pour les articles fréquemment utilisés et de maximiser les opportunités de partage. En juin 2016, seulement quatre mois après sa création, l'organisation avait réduit les stocks disponibles de 20 %. En outre, l'utilisation des tours Logistics Control qui centralisent la gestion et la fourniture des approvisionnements de gisements, tels que l'agent de soutènement pour les opérations de fracturation hydraulique, a réduit les coûts relatifs à l'exploitation des sites en effectuant toutes les opérations de planification, d'approvisionnement tactique, et de génération de bons de commande afin de garantir une fourniture rentable d'agent de soutènement au gisement. Depuis leur ouverture fin 2014, ces tours de contrôle ont permis à la société d'économiser 250 millions USD de frais de camionnage. Le chiffre d'affaires de 1,3 milliard USD du groupe Cameron, dont 71 % provenaient des marchés internationaux, était stable en séquentiel. Parmi les activités du groupe, OneSubsea a enregistré une augmentation de 11 % en séquentiel en réponse à une forte activité et exécution de projets dans les zones Europe/CEI/Afrique et Amérique latine, tandis que l'activité Systèmes de surface a généré un solide chiffre d'affaires au Moyen-Orient. Ces augmentations ont néanmoins été contrebalancées par le déclin du chiffre d'affaires de Systèmes de forage en réponse à un carnet de commande décroissant et à la baisse des réservations. Valves & Mesures a également baissé après les solides expéditions internationales du trimestre précédent. Murphy Exploration & Production Company–USA, une filiale de Murphy Oil Corporation, a octroyé à la Subsea Integration Alliance le premier contrat du secteur relatif à un système de stimulation multiphase sous-marin intégré en eau profonde d'ingénierie, d'approvisionnement, de construction, d'installation et de mise en service (IACIM) pour le gisement Dalmatian situé dans la partie américaine du Golfe du Mexique. Il s'agira du plus long raccordement de stimulation multiphase sous-marin en eau profonde du secteur et de la première attribution de projet EPCIC pour la Subsea Integration Alliance, qui a été formée en juillet 2015 entre OneSubsea, Schlumberger, et Subsea 7. La portée du contrat couvre la fourniture et l'installation d'un système de stimulation multiphase sous-marin, de contrôles sous-marins et de surface, ainsi qu'une liaison ombilicale d'alimentation et de commande intégrée de 35 km. Les activités d'installation offshore devraient commencer en 2018. Statoil a octroyé à OneSubsea un contrat d'ingénierie, d'approvisionnement et de construction visant à fournir le système de production sous-marin destiné au gisement de gaz et de condensats d'Utgard en mer du Nord. La portée du contrat couvre un système de collecteur sous-marin à châssis d'ancrage, deux têtes de puits sous-marines et des arbres verticaux mono-diamètre sous-marins, un système de contrôle de la production, ainsi que des outils d'intervention et de reconditionnement connexes. En travaillant en étroite collaboration avec Statoil, OneSubsea développera un nouveau système de têtes de puits sous-marines adapté aux eaux relativement peu profondes du gisement d'Utgard. OneSubsea et Statoil ont déjà travaillé ensemble pour mettre au point un arbre vertical mono-diamètre sous-marin en tant que solution normalisée pour les développements sous-marins de Statoil. Les arbres verticaux, qui font partie des réalisations prévues au contrat, seront assemblés et testés dans l'installation de OneSubsea à Horsøy, en Norvège. Transocean a octroyé à Schlumberger deux contrats de services de gestion d'équipement de contrôle de pression d'une durée de 10 ans évalués à plus de 350 millions USD. Le premier contrat inclut la gestion par Schlumberger des colonnes montantes Cameron de Transocean dans la partie américaine du Golfe du Mexique, ainsi que le stockage, la maintenance, l'inspection, la réparation, la recertification, et la gestion orientée données des colonnes montantes sur les appareils de forage. Le deuxième contrat prévoit la fourniture d'une gamme complète de solutions Schlumberger destinées à entretenir et réparer les systèmes de blocs obturateurs de puits ainsi que d'autres équipements de contrôle de la pression pour neufs appareils de forage en eau ultra-profonde et en milieu hostile. Ces contrats contribueront à réduire le coût total de propriété des équipements offshore et à accroître la disponibilité des équipements de contrôle de la pression via des solutions techniques, opérationnelles et commerciales intégrées. En Arabie saoudite, le segment Valves & Mesures a été sélectionné par plusieurs sociétés d'ingénierie, d'approvisionnement et de construction dirigées par Saudi KAD pour fournir et installer des clapets à bille GROVE* et des actionneurs LEDEEN* d'une valeur de plus de 40 millions USD destinés à soutenir des projets de pipeline clés relatifs aux programmes Master Gas Phase II et Fadhili Gas. Les installations de Schlumberger dans le Royaume ainsi que son soutien des activités de mise en service et d'exécution ont fait de Cameron le partenaire idéal pour ce projet. Outre les résultats financiers déterminés conformément aux principes comptables généralement reconnus (PCGR) aux États-Unis, ce communiqué de presse sur les résultats de l'exercice complet et du quatrième trimestre 2016 comprend également des mesures financières non-PCGR (telles que définies par le Règlement G de la SEC). Le résultat net, hors charges et crédits, ainsi que les mesures dérivées de celui-ci (y compris BPA dilué, hors charges et crédits ; résultat net avant participations minoritaires, hors charges et crédits ; et taux d'imposition effectif, hors charges et crédits) sont des mesures financières non-PCGR. La direction estime que l'exclusion des charges et crédits de ces mesures financières permet d'évaluer plus efficacement la période d'opérations de Schlumberger au cours de l'exercice et d'identifier les tendances d'exploitation qui pourraient être masquées par les articles exclus. Ces mesures sont également utilisées par la direction comme des mesures de performance pour déterminer certains régimes d'intéressement. Les mesures financières non PCGR doivent être envisagées en plus des autres informations financières présentées en conformité avec PCGR, et non pas en remplacement de celles-ci. Ce qui suit est un rapprochement de ces mesures non-PCGR aux mesures PCGR comparables : Schlumberger est le premier fournisseur mondial de technologie pour le traitement, la production, le forage et la caractérisation de réservoirs pour l’industrie pétrolière et gazière. Présente dans plus de 85 pays et comptant près de 100 000 employés de plus de 140 nationalités, Schlumberger offre le plus large éventail de produits et de services allant de l’exploration à la production, ainsi que des solutions intégrées allant du forage au pipeline qui optimisent la récupération des hydrocarbures pour assurer le rendement des gisements. Le présent communiqué sur les résultats de l'exercice complet et du quatrième trimestre 2016, ainsi que d’autres déclarations que nous formulons, contiennent des « déclarations prévisionnelles » au sens des lois fédérales sur les valeurs mobilières, qui contiennent des déclarations qui ne constituent pas des faits historiques, telles que nos prévisions ou nos attentes concernant les perspectives commerciales ; la croissance de Schlumberger dans son ensemble et de chacun de ses segments (et des produits ou des zones géographiques spécifiées dans chaque segment) ; la croissance de la demande et de la production de pétrole et de gaz naturel ; les prix du gaz naturel et du pétrole ; les améliorations des procédures d’exploitation et de la technologie, y compris notre programme de transformation ; les dépenses d’investissement par Schlumberger et l’industrie du pétrole et du gaz ; les stratégies commerciales des clients de Schlumberger ; les bénéfices anticipés de la transaction Cameron ; le succès des coentreprises et des alliances de Schlumberger ; la conjoncture économique mondiale future ; et les résultats d’exploitation futurs. Ces déclarations sont sujettes à des risques et à des incertitudes y compris, sans toutefois s’y limiter : la conjoncture économique mondiale ; les changements dans les dépenses d’exploration et de production par les clients de Schlumberger et les changements dans le niveau d’exploration et de développement du pétrole et du gaz naturel ; la conjoncture économique, politique et commerciale générale dans des régions clés du monde ; le risque lié aux devises étrangères ; la pression tarifaire ; les facteurs climatiques et saisonniers ; les changements, retards ou annulations opérationnels ;les déclins de production ; les changements de réglementations gouvernementales et d'exigences réglementaires, y compris celles liées à l’exploration offshore de pétrole et de gaz, aux sources radioactives, aux explosifs, aux produits chimiques, aux services de fracturation hydraulique et aux initiatives liées au climat ; l’incapacité de la technologie à relever les nouveaux défis dans l'exploration ; l’incapacité à intégrer Cameron avec succès et à réaliser les synergies attendues ; l'incapacité à retenir les employés clés ; ainsi que d'autres risques et incertitudes détaillés dans le présent communiqué sur les résultats de l'exercice complet et du quatrième trimestre 2016 et dans les informations supplémentaires, ainsi que dans nos formulaires 10-K, 10-Q et 8-K les plus récents, déposés auprès de la Commission des valeurs mobilières des États-Unis ou fournis à cette dernière. En cas de concrétisation d’un ou plusieurs de ces risques ou incertitudes (ou si les conséquences d’un tel développement évoluaient), ou d’inexactitude de nos hypothèses sous-jacentes, il est possible que les résultats réels diffèrent sensiblement des résultats énoncés dans nos déclarations prévisionnelles. Schlumberger rejette toute intention ou obligation de publication de mise à jour ou de révision de toute déclaration prévisionnelle, que ce soit du fait de nouvelles informations, d’événements futurs ou pour toute autre raison.


News Article | February 15, 2017
Site: globenewswire.com

DUBLIN, IRELAND--(Marketwired - Feb. 15, 2017) - Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:FO)(AIM:FOG)(ESM:FAC) is pleased to announce that Origin Energy Resources Limited ("Origin"), Falcon's 35% joint venture partner, has submitted the Results of Evaluation of the Discovery and Preliminary Estimate of Petroleum in Place for the Amungee NW-1H Velkerri B Shale Gas Pool ("Report") to the Northern Territory Government. The submission follows the completion of extended production testing at the Amungee NW-1H exploration well of the "B Shale" member of the Middle Velkerri Formation. In addition, Origin undertook a resource study based on the Amungee NW-1H well results and other key wells in the Beetaloo Basin including regional seismic data to determine a 2C contingent gas resource estimate for the Middle Velkerri B Shale Pool within EP76, EP98 and EP117. The Report was submitted in compliance with Section 64 of the Northern Territory Petroleum Act (2016) and as per the Reporting a Petroleum Discovery Guideline. The Report follows the initial submission of the notification of discovery and an initial report on discovery in October 2016. The Report provides the following volumetric estimates and recovery / utilisation factor for the B Shale member of the Middle Velkerri Formation within permits EP76, EP98, and EP117. Understanding the factors controlling deliverability and recovery as well as spatial variation within the gas play/shale pool are in their infancy. A quantitative assessment of the aggregated estimated recoverable resource of the gas play that can handle these complexities will require a statistically significant number of wells testing the gas play. As there is only a single production test within the gas play Origin decided upon a qualitative assessment approach instead to estimate the technically recoverable resource. Factors considered in the qualitative assessment of technically recoverable hydrocarbon resource in the gas play were the SRV recovery factor range, the subsurface utilization factor range and surface utilization factor range. Origin's Contingent Gas Resource Estimates for the Middle Velkerri B Shale Pool within EP76, EP98 and EP117 Origin has prepared a contingent gas resource estimate using probabilistic methods and reservoir evaluation data, in addition to regional seismic data. As noted in Origin's press release the "The contingent resource estimates contained in [their] report are based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation that have been prepared by Alexander Côté who is a full-time Origin employee and a Qualified Reserves and Resource Evaluator. Mr Côté is a registered professional engineer with specialised unconventional gas resource characterisation and development experience. Mr Côté has consented to the form and context in which these statements appear". Mr Côté is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta. On 14 September 2016, the Northern Territory Government introduced a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, and subsequently established an independent scientific inquiry. Pending the outcome of this independent inquiry, Origin has requested a suspension of all drilling operations with the DPIR. We await their formal response to the request. "The submission of a discovery evaluation report supporting the existence of a material gas resource in the Beetaloo Basin coupled with Origin's best estimate assessment of a gross contingent gas resource of 6.6 TCF for the Middle Velkerri B shale pool surrounding and adjacent to the Amungee NW-1H exploration well are exciting developments for Falcon. Additional exploration and appraisal activity will be required to refine the pool size and better assess the recoverable resource range and ultimately the commerciality of the play. However, it is interesting to note that in Origin's opinion the Marcellus and Barnett Shales in the USA are analogous, commercially-productive fields that are similar to the Middle Velkerri B Shale reservoir." Please refer to Appendix A for a copy of Origin's ASX/Media Release "Beetaloo Basin drill results indicate material gas resource". This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of Regulation 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Further information relating to disclosure of resources Certain information in this press release may constitute forward-looking information. Any statements that are contained in this news release that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "intend", "plan", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "projects", "potential", "scheduled", "forecast", "outlook", "budget", "hope", "support" or the negative of those terms or similar words suggesting future outcomes. This information is based on current expectations that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Such information may include, but is not limited to, comments made with respect to the type, number, schedule, stimulating, testing and objectives of the wells to be drilled in the Beetaloo basin Australia, the prospectivity of the Middle Velkerri play and the prospect of the exploration programme being brought to commerciality, risks associated with the introduction of a moratorium, fluctuations in market prices for shale gas; risks related to the exploration, development and production of shale gas reserves; general economic, market and business conditions; substantial capital requirements; uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and resources; extent of, and cost of compliance with, government laws and regulations and the effect of changes in such laws and regulations; the need to obtain regulatory approvals before development commences; environmental risks and hazards and the cost of compliance with environmental regulations; aboriginal claims; inherent risks and hazards with operations such as mechanical or pipe failure, cratering and other dangerous conditions; potential cost overruns; variations in foreign exchange rates; competition for capital, equipment, new leases, pipeline capacity and skilled personnel; the failure of the holder of licenses, leases and permits to meet requirements of such; changes in royalty regimes; failure to accurately estimate abandonment and reclamation costs; inaccurate estimates and assumptions by management and their joint venture partners; effectiveness of internal controls; the potential lack of available drilling equipment; failure to obtain or keep key personnel; title deficiencies; geo-political risks; and risk of litigation. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive and that these factors and risks are difficult to predict. Actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. Falcon assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those reflected in the forward looking-statements unless and until required by securities laws applicable to Falcon. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is contained in Falcon's filings with the Canadian securities regulators, which filings are available at www.sedar.com, including under "Risk Factors" in the Annual Information Form. This announcement has been reviewed by Dr. Gábor Bada, Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd's Head of Technical Operations. Dr. Bada obtained his geology degree at the Eötvös L. University in Budapest, Hungary and his PhD at the Vrije Aniversiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. He is a member of AAPG and EAGE. Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd is an international oil & gas company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of conventional and unconventional oil and gas assets, with the current portfolio focused in Australia, South Africa and Hungary. Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd is incorporated in British Columbia, Canada and headquartered in Dublin, Ireland with a technical team based in Budapest, Hungary. For further information on Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. please visit www.falconoilandgas.com Origin Energy (ASX:ORG) is the leading Australian integrated energy company with market leading positions in energy retailing (approximately 4.3 million customers), power generation (approximately 6,000 MW of capacity owned and contracted) and natural gas production (1,093 PJ of 2P reserves and annual production of 82 PJe). To match its leadership in the supply of green energy, Origin also aspires to be the number one renewables company in Australia. Through Australia Pacific LNG, its incorporated joint venture with ConocoPhillips and Sinopec, Origin is developing Australia's biggest CSG to LNG project based on the country's largest 2P CSG reserves base. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. To view Appendix A - Origin's ASX/Media Release, please visit the following link:


News Article | February 27, 2017
Site: www.businesswire.com

Antoine Frérot, Veolia Environnement’s Chairman & CEO commented: “2016 represents another year of strong results growth for Veolia. Our margins have continued to improve and we achieved net free cash flow of nearly €1 billion. Revenue also improved significantly in the fourth quarter, with 1.9% growth at constant exchange rates. These good results were achieved due to the efforts of each and every one of our Group’s employees, and I would like to thank them. At the end of 2015, we presented our 3-year development plan. It is based on controlled and profitable growth and accompanied by continued cost reduction efforts. Our ambition remains intact. The last quarter of 2016 showed that Veolia has demonstrated the capacity to generate growth and I wish to further accelerate growth by committing additional resources. In addition, our business situation has toughened during recent months. In order to finance reinforced commercial efforts and address this new reality, we are intensifying our cost savings program to drive €800 million in savings over the 2016-2018 period compared with the previous expectation of €600 million. These additional efforts will enable Veolia to continue on the path of profitable growth.” By business, and at constant exchange rates, Water revenue declined by 1.5% to €11,138 million due to lower construction revenue, while Waste revenue increased 0.5% to €8,401 million given a 0.6% increase in revenue due to higher volumes and service price increases of 0.8%. Energy revenue increased 0.4% to €4,851 million, including the impact of lower energy prices, as well as a slightly favorable weather effect (+€35 million) and good volumes in China. Excluding the impact of lower energy prices and construction revenue, each business increased revenue at constant exchange rates by +1.8%, +1.6% and +3.2%, respectively.The reinforcement of the percent of revenue generated by industrial clients continues, representing 45% of 2016 revenue compared with 44% in 2015. * At constant exchange rates ** Equivalent to €3.4bn to €3.6bn (excluding IFRIC 12) and before taking into account the unfavorable exchange rate impacts recorded in 2016 Definitions of all financial indicators used in this press release can be found at the end of this document. Veolia group is the global leader in optimized resource management. With over 174,000 employees worldwide, the Group designs and provides water, waste and energy management solutions that contribute to the sustainable development of communities and industries. Through its three complementary business activities, Veolia helps to develop access to resources, preserve available resources, and to replenish them. In 2015, the group Veolia supplied 100 million people with drinking water and 63 million people with wastewater service, produced 63 million megawatt hours of energy and converted 42.9 million metric tons of waste into new materials and energy. Veolia Environnement (listed on Paris Euronext: VIE) recorded consolidated revenue of €25.0 billion in 2015. www.veolia.com Veolia Environnement is a corporation listed on the Euronext Paris. This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control, including but not limited to: the risk of suffering reduced profits or losses as a result of intense competition, the risk that changes in energy prices and taxes may reduce Veolia Environnement’s profits, the risk that governmental authorities could terminate or modify some of Veolia Environnement’s contracts, the risk that acquisitions may not provide the benefits that Veolia Environnement hopes to achieve, the risks related to customary provisions of divesture transactions, the risk that Veolia Environnement’s compliance with environmental laws may become more costly in the future, the risk that currency exchange rate fluctuations may negatively affect Veolia Environnement’s financial results and the price of its shares, the risk that Veolia Environnement may incur environmental liability in connection with its past, present and future operations, as well as the other risks described in the documents Veolia Environnement has filed with the Autorités des Marchés Financiers (French securities regulator). Veolia Environnement does not undertake, nor does it have, any obligation to provide updates or to revise any forward looking statements. Investors and security holders may obtain from Veolia Environnement a free copy of documents it filed (www.veolia.com) with the Autorités des Marchés Financiers. This document contains "non‐GAAP financial measures". These "non‐GAAP financial measures" might be defined differently from similar financial measures made public by other groups and should not replace GAAP financial measures prepared pursuant to IFRS standards.. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016 Under concession contracts with local authorities, infrastructure is accounted, as appropriate, as an intangible asset, a financial receivable, or a combination of the two. Veolia may have a payment obligation vis-a-vis the grantor to utilize the associated assets. In July 2016, IFRIC published a verdict regarding these payments and concluded that in the case of fixed payments required by the operator, an asset and a liability should be recorded (intangible model) Veolia identified the contracts concerned and will apply the new IFRIC 12 measures retroactive to 1/1/2015. The most significant contracts concerned are our water concessions in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. RECONCILIATION OF 2015 AND 2016 FIGURES EXCLUDING AND INCLUDING IMPACTS OF THE ADOPTION OF THE IFRIC 12 INTERPRETATION Revenue, net free cash flow and net financial debt are not impacted by the adoption of the IFRIC 12 interpretation. The data for the year ended December 31, 2016, presented in this press release do not include the impact of the re-presentations relating to the adoption of the IFRIC 12 interpretation. (1) Including the share of current net income of joint ventures and associates viewed as core Company activitie (2) See definition in Appendix (3) Subject to the approval of General Shareholders’ Meeting of April 20, 2017 The main foreign exchange impacts were as follows: C] INCOME STATEMENT EXCLUDING THE IMPACT OF IFRIC 12 Group consolidated revenue stood at €24,390.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to €24,964.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of -0.4% at constant exchange rates. Excluding Construction revenue 5 and the impact of lower energy prices, revenue increased +2.0% at constant exchange rates. Revenue posted an upturn of +1.9% at constant exchange rates in the 4th quarter (after -2.1% in the 1st quarter, +0.1% in the 2nd quarter, and -1.7% in the 3rd quarter at constant exchange rates), reflecting the Group’s return to growth. Excluding Construction and the impact of energy prices, 4th quarter revenue rose by +3.4% at constant exchange rates (compared to +1.2% in the 1st quarter, +1.9% in the 2nd quarter, and +1.6% in the 3rd quarter). The municipal sector generated 55% of 2016 revenue (i.e. around €13 billion), and the industrial sector generated 45% (i.e. around €11 billion). The change in revenue between 2015 and 2016 breaks down by main impact as follows: The foreign exchange impact on revenue amounted to -€473.2 million (-1.9% of revenue) and mainly reflects fluctuations in the value of the euro against the U.K. pound sterling (-€275.8 million), the Argentine peso (-€90.6 million), the Japanese yen (+€43.9 million), the Polish zloty (-€38.9 million), the Mexican peso (-€27.3 million), and the Chinese renminbi (-€29.2 million). The decrease in Construction revenue (-€484 million, representing -1.9% of Group revenue) essentially concerns Veolia Water Technologies and SADE for -€345 million, as well as the completion of construction work on the Leeds and Shropshire PFI incinerators in the United Kingdom (-€80 million). Group revenue was affected by the decline in energy prices (-0.5%), primarily in the United States and in Central Europe. The positive business momentum (Commerce/Volumes and scope impact) of +€423 million was due to: Favorable price effects were the result of tariff indexations that remain positive, although moderate, and the favorable price impact from recycled materials (+€15 million, particularly paper). The revenue trend in the 4th quarter of 2016 was marked by a turnaround, driven by the growth of Europe excluding France and the Rest of the world: Revenue in France for the year ended December 31, 2016 was €5,417.7 million, down by -1.0% compared with the prior year. Excluding the impact of Construction activities and energy prices, revenue decreased -0.9%. Revenue in the Europe excluding France segment for the year ended December 31, 2016 amounted to €8,286.3 million, up +0.1% at constant exchange rates compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. Revenue posted an upturn of +1.5% at constant exchange rates in the 4th quarter, after virtual stability throughout the year: -0.9% in the 1st quarter, +0.3% in the 2nd quarter, and -0.6% in the 3rd quarter. Excluding the impact of Construction activities and energy prices, revenue increased +2.3% at constant exchange rates for the year. This increase breaks down as follows: Revenue in the Rest of the World segment for the year ended December 31, 2016 was €6,028.4 million, up +3.7% at constant exchange rates compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. After a decrease of -2.4% at constant exchange rates in the 1st quarter, revenue continuously improved throughout the year: +1.9% in the 2nd quarter, +6.3% in the 3rd quarter, and +9.1% in the 4th quarter. Excluding the impact of Construction activities and energy prices, Rest of the World revenue increased +5.0% at constant exchange rates. Rest of the World revenue reflects solid growth across the region, with the exception of Australia: The good growth in the Rest of the World segment was offset by lower revenue in Australia (-3.1% at constant exchange rates). In the Waste business, the increase in collection and treatment activities only partially offset the fall in industrial services. The Global Businesses segment reported revenue of €4,626.2 million for year the ended December 31, 2016, down -4.1% at constant exchange rates compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. After a decrease of -5.2% at constant exchange rates for the nine months period ended September 30, 2016, the decline in 4th quarter revenue was less significant at -1.1% at constant exchange rates. Excluding the impact of Construction activities and energy prices, revenue increased +3.0% at constant exchange rates. The change in revenue was mainly due to: Water revenue declined -1.5% at constant exchange rates year-on-year, and increased +1.8% at constant exchange rates excluding the impact of the Construction activity and energy prices. This decline can be explained as follows: Waste revenue rose +0.5% at constant exchange rates year-on-year, and +1.6% at constant exchange rates excluding the impact of the decrease in Construction activity, in relation, overall, to a positive volume impact of +0.6%, and a service price impact of +0.8%, and more specifically: Energy revenue rose 0.4% at constant exchange rates year-on-year, and increased +3.2% at constant exchange rates excluding the decrease in energy prices (impact of -€115 million). This increase can be explained as follows: Changes in EBITDA by segment were as follows: In 2016, the Group’s consolidated EBITDA amounted to €3,056.0 million, an increase of 4.3% at constant exchange rates compared to 2015, generating an improvement in the EBITDA margin (12.5% in 2016, compared to 12.0% in 2015). This improvement in EBITDA was primarily due to operational efficiency, with cost savings in the amount of €245 million. Changes in EBITDA by segment between 2015 and 2016 were as follows: The change in EBITDA between 2015 and 2016 breaks down by main impact as follows: The foreign exchange impact on EBITDA was negative, amounting to -€71.4 million. It mainly reflects fluctuations of UK the pound sterling (-€38.2 million), South American currencies (-€14.7 million, essentially the Argentine peso), the Chinese renminbi (-€8.7 million) and the Polish zloty (-€8.3 million). Prices effects, net of cost inflation, had a negative impact, notably in France, in line with the very low indexation of contracts. The impact of French Water contract renegotiations amounted to -€31 million. The volumes, commerce and scope impacts are favorable, in the amount of +€38 million: Cost-savings plans contributed €245 million. They mainly cover operational efficiency (for 42%) and purchasing (35%). They were achieved across all geographical zones: France (31%), Europe excluding France (26%), Rest of the World (26%), Global Businesses (12%) and Corporate (5%). Other changes mainly concern one-off items in the amount of -€46 million, particularly in France. Changes in current EBIT by segment were as follows: The Group’s consolidated current EBIT for the year ended December 31, 2016 amounted to €1,383.9 million, up significantly by +8.5% at constant exchange rates compared to 2015. This positive increase in Current EBIT was mainly due to: The foreign exchange impact on Current EBIT was negative at -€43.8 million and mainly reflects fluctuations of the UK pound sterling (-€24.1 million), South American currencies (-€7.5 million, including the Argentine peso), and the Chinese renminbi (-€7.7 million). The reconciling items between EBITDA and Current EBIT as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows: Depreciation and amortization charges (-€1,394.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016) are up +3.1% at constant exchange rates, or -€42.7 million compared to depreciation and amortization charges for the year ended December 31, 2015 (-€1,380.6 million) mainly due to acquisitions and the commissioning of new assets. Capital gains and losses on disposals of industrial assets for the year ended December 31, 2016 concern capital gains on the disposal of industrial assets in relation to the continuous review of industrial asset portfolios. The share of current net income of joint ventures and associates comprises the UK entities (Water and Waste) for €9 million (versus €15.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, due to movements in scope), and Chinese Water and Waste entities for €44.3 million (compared to €44.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015). The Chinese Water concessions nevertheless rose at constant exchange rates (€35.8 million in 2015, versus €36.2 million in 2016). Net charges to operating provisions for the year ended December 31, 2016 include net provision reversals, particularly usual provision reversals related to landfill site remediation (mainly in France and the United Kingdom), and provision reversals in relation to the removal of certain risks in France and Italy. For the year ended December 31, 2015, this heading included a provision reversal for the “Olivet” contracts in the Water activities in France and the removal of certain risks in France and Australia. 2.3 Analysis of EBITDA and Current EBIT by segment EBITDA in France fell -8.1% during the year. In the Water business, cost savings only partially offset contractual erosion of -€31 million (margin degradation), lower volumes, and the negative impact of price effects net of inflation. EBITDA also fell in the Waste business despite cost savings. The decline is due to a decrease in revenue, unfavorable price impacts net of inflation, and the absence of non-recurring items that benefited 2015. Current EBIT fell in France due to the fall in EBITDA. The EBITDA of the Europe excluding France segment increased significantly in most countries and particularly: The rise in EBITDA in Europe excluding France also reflected cost savings efforts undertaken in all geographic areas. Current EBIT in Europe excluding France increased due to the improvement in EBITDA and the positive change in operating provisions and in particular related to landfills in the UK. Rest of the World EBITDA grew significantly in Asia, as well as in Latin America and North America. Asia EBITDA posted solid growth throughout the year, driven by cost reductions and the increase in revenue, particularly in China and Japan. In China, EBITDA benefited from the substantial increase in Industrial water (integration of the Sinopec contract), Hazardous Waste (commissioning of the Changsha incinerator) and heating networks, particularly Harbin. EBITDA in Latin America was up sharply in the 2nd half, particularly in Argentina, in line with the change in revenue. Following a decline in the first half, particularly regarding Energy, North America EBITDA rebounded in the 2nd half thanks to cost-cutting efforts and the integration of the Chemours Sulfur Products division’s assets, which offset the decline in revenue in industrial services and the lower gas price in Energy. Rest of the World Current EBIT was up at constant exchange rates, but to a lesser extent than EBITDA growth, penalized by higher depreciation and amortization charges relating to the integration of the Chemours Sulfur Products division’s assets, the negative change in operating provisions in the US and Australia, and the early repayment of a receivable in Korea. Results of the Chinese Water concessions, recorded within the share of net income (loss) of joint ventures and associates rose at constant exchange rates. EBITDA of the Global Businesses segment is up significantly: Current EBIT of Global Businesses also rose thanks to the increase in EBITDA and the favorable comparison effect in relation to asset impairments in Hazardous waste in 2015. The cost of net financial debt totaled -€423.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, versus -€445.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, representing a decrease of €22.3 million. This decline in the cost of net financial debt mainly reflects the repayment of the inflation-indexed bond using available cash in June 2015, bond refinancing under better conditions, the Group’s active debt management, and a positive exchange rate impact of €6 million, offsetting the increase in the cost of foreign exchange derivatives. The financing rate fell from 5.0% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 4.95% for the year ended December 31, 2016. OTHER FINANCIAL INCOME AND EXPENSES Other current financial income and expenses totaled -€30.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, versus €27.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Other current financial income and expenses included the impacts of financial divestitures for €12.8 million, and notably impacts related to fair-value remeasurement of previously-held equity interests in France and China. For the year ended December 31, 2015, capital gains or losses on financial divestitures amounted to €59.5 million, including the capital gain on the disposal of the Group’s Israel activities. Net gains/losses on loans and receivables for the year ended December 31, 2015 included the interest on the loan to Transdev, repaid in full in March 2016. Other non-current financial income and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily concern the Group’s sale of 20% of Transdev. The income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 amounted to -€192.3 million, compared to -€199.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016 declined to 25.7% (versus 28.0% for the year ended December 31, 2015), after adjustment for the impact of financial divestitures, non-current items within net income of fully controlled entities, and the share of net income of equity-accounted companies. 2.6 Current net income (loss) / Net income (loss) attributable to owners of the Company The share of net income attributable to non-controlling interests totaled €102.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to €101.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Net income attributable to owners of the Company was €382.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to €450.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Current net income attributable to owners of the Company was €609.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to €580.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Based on a weighted average number of outstanding shares of 549.0 million (basic) and 568.5 million (diluted), compared with 548.5 million as of December 31, 2015 (basic and diluted), earnings per share attributable to owners of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 was €0.57 (basic) and €0.55 (diluted), compared to 0.69 (basic and diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2015. Current net income per share attributable to owners of the Company was €1.11 (basic) and €1.07 (diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to €1.06 (basic and diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2015. The dilutive effect taken into account in the above earnings per share calculation concerns the OCEANE bonds convertible into and/or exchangeable for new and/or existing shares issued in March 2016, as well as the shares attributed under the long-term incentive plan set up in 2015. Net income (loss) attributable to owners of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 breaks down as follows: The reconciliation of Current EBIT with operating income, as shown in the income statement, is as follows: Net income (loss) attributable to owners of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015, breaks down as follows: The following table summarizes the change in Net Financial Debt and net Free Cash Flow: Net free cash flow amounted to €970 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, versus €856 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in net free cash flow compared to December 31, 2015 primarily reflects the improvement in EBITDA, the favorable change in operating working capital requirements, lower restructuring charges, partially offset by the increase in net industrial investments in line with fewer industrial divestitures in 2016. Total Group gross industrial investments, including new operating financial assets, amounted to €1,485 million in 2016, compared with €1,484 million in 2015. Industrial investments, excluding discontinued operations, break down by segment as follows: Gross industrial investments for maintenance and contractual requirements totaled €1,280 million in 2016 (vs. €1,217 million in 2015), representing 5.2% of revenue (stable compared to 2015). Financial investments amounted to -€881 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 (including the net financial debt of new entities and acquisition costs) and include the acquisition of Kurion in the US (-€296 million), the Chemours’ Sulfur Products division (-€290 million) the Pedreira landfill in Brazil (-€71 million), and the Prague Left Bank district heating network (-€70 million). For the year ended December 31, 2015, financial investments for -€270 million were mainly related to the purchase of minority stakes in the Water business in Central Europe. Financial divestitures totaled €380 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and include the sale of 20% of Transdev for €216 million (including disposal costs). For the year ended December 31, 2015, financial divestitures included the divestiture of Group activities in Israel. Financial divestitures, including the reimbursement by Transdev Group of the shareholder loan in March 2016 for €345 million (recorded under “Change in receivables and other financial assets”), amounted to €725 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This transaction therefore had a total impact of €565 million on Group net financial debt (excluding disposal costs). Loans to joint ventures, recorded under “Change in receivables and other financial assets” totaled €165.6 million as of December 31, 2016 (versus €509.9 million as of December 31, 2015) and included loans to the Chinese concessions of €124.1 million (€116 million as of December 31, 2015). As of December 31, 2015, loans to equity-accounted entities also included loans to Transdev Group of €345.4 million repaid in full as of December 31, 2016. The change in operating working capital requirements (excluding discontinued operations) totaled +€270 million as of December 31, 2016, compared to +€203 million as of December 31, 2015. This increase was attributable to the change in inventories (+€35 million), operating receivables (+€84 million) and operating payables (+€151 million). As of December 31, 2016, net financial debt after hedging6 was borrowed at 92% at fixed rates and 8% at variable rates. The average maturity of net financial debt was 9.3 years as of December 31, 2016 vs. 8.8 years as of December 31, 2015. The leverage ratio for the year ended December 31, 2016, i.e. the ratio of closing Net Financial Debt (NFD) to EBITDA, decreased compared to December 31, 2015: Liquid assets of the Group as of December 31, 2016 break down as follows: The increase in net liquid assets mainly reflects the offering of bonds convertible into and/or exchangeable for new and/or existing shares (OCEANEs) for a nominal amount of €700 million, the issue of a renminbi-denominated bond on the Chinese domestic market in September 2016 for a nominal amount of €136 million equivalent and the issue of euro-denominated bonds for a nominal amount of €1.1 billion in October 2016, partially offset by upcoming bond maturities in 2017, including the euro-denominated bond maturing in January 2017 for a nominal amount of €606 million, the euro-denominated bond maturing in June 2017 for a nominal amount of €250 million, the renminbi-denominated bond maturing in June 2017 for a nominal amount of €68 million equivalent, and the floating-rate euro-denominated bond maturing in May 2017 for a nominal amount of €350 million. Veolia Environnement may draw on the multi-currency syndicated credit facility and all credit lines at any time. On November 6, 2015, Veolia Environnement signed a new multi-currency syndicated loan facility in the amount of €3 billion initially maturing in 2020, extended to 2021 in October 2016 and extendable to 2022 with the possibility for drawdowns in Eastern European currencies and Chinese Renminbi. This syndicated loan facility replaces the two syndicated loan facilities set up in 2011: a 5-year multi-currency loan facility of €2.5 billion, and a 3-year loan of €500 million for drawdowns in Polish zlotys, Czech crowns and Hungarian forints. This syndicated loan facility was not drawn down as of December 31, 2016. In 2015, Veolia Environnement renegotiated all its bilateral credit lines for a total undrawn amount of €925 million as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, the letter of credit facility was drawn by USD 176.3 million. The portion that may be drawn in cash amounted to USD 8.7 million (€8.2 million euro equivalent). It is undrawn and recorded in the liquidity table above. The decrease in net liquid assets mainly reflects upcoming bond maturities before June 30, 2017, including the euro-denominated bond maturing in January 2017 for a nominal amount of €606 million, the euro-denominated bond maturing in June 2017 for a nominal amount of €250 million, and the renminbi denominated bond maturing in June 2017 for a nominal amount of €68 million equivalent, partially offset by an offering of bonds convertible into and/or exchangeable for new and/or existing shares (OCEANEs) for a nominal amount of €700 million .E] RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED EXCLUDING THE IMPACT OF IFRIC 12 Veolia Environnement uses the ROCE indicator (return on capital employed) to track the Group's profitability. This indicator measures Veolia Environnement's ability to provide a return on the funds provided by shareholders and lenders. The Group distinguishes between: The return on capital employed indicators are defined in the appendix. In both cases, the impacts of the Group’s investment in the Transdev Group joint venture, which is not viewed as a core Company activity and whose contribution is recognized as a share of net income of other equity-accounted entities, are excluded from the calculations. Current EBIT after tax is calculated as follows: (*) Including the share of net income (loss) of joint ventures and associates. Average capital employed for the year was calculated as follows: The Group's post-tax return on capital employed (ROCE) is as follows: The Group's post-tax return on capital employed (ROCE) was 7.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016 versus 6.8% for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in the return on capital employed between 2016 and 2015 was primarily due to improved operating performance. Unlike post-tax ROCE, the capital employed used for the pre-tax ROCE does not include investments in joint ventures and associates. The Group’s pre-tax return on capital employed (ROCE) by segment is as follows: Cost of net financial debt is equal to the cost of gross debt, including related gains and losses on interest rate and currency hedges, less income on cash and cash equivalents. Operating cash flow before changes in working capital, as presented in the consolidated cash flow statement, is comprised of three components: operating cash flow from operating activities (referred to as “adjusted operating cash flow” and known in French as “capacité d'autofinancement opérationnelle”) consisting of operating income and expenses received and paid (“cash”), operating cash flow from financing activities including cash financial items relating to other financial income and expenses and operating cash flow from discontinued operations composed of cash operating and financial income and expense items classified in net income from discontinued operations pursuant to IFRS 5. Adjusted operating cash flow does not include the share of net income attributable to equity-accounted entities. Net income (loss) from discontinued operations is the total of income and expenses, net of tax, related to businesses divested or in the course of divestiture, in accordance with IFRS 5. The term “change at constant exchange rates” represents the change resulting from the application of exchange rates of the prior period to the current period, all other things being equal. The municipal sector encompasses services in the Water, Waste and Energy business lines aimed at users, performed under contracts with municipal governments, groups of municipal governments, or regional or national governments. The industrial sector covers Water, Waste and Energy management services, offered to industrial or service sector customers. EBITDA comprises the sum of all operating income and expenses received and paid (excluding restructuring charges, non-current WCR impairments, renewal expenses and share acquisition and disposal costs) and principal payments on operating financial assets. The EBITDA margin is defined as the ratio of EBITDA to revenue. To calculate Current EBIT, the following items will be deducted from operating income: (*) Correction of an erratum in the figures of the consolidated statement of financial position- equity and liabilities: page 35 Current net income is defined as the sum of the following items: Current net income earnings per share is defined as the ratio of current net income (not restated for the cost of the coupon attributable to hybrid debt holders) by the weighted average number of outstanding shares during the year. Net industrial investments, as presented in the statement of changes in net financial debt, include industrial investments (purchases of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, and operating financial assets), net of industrial asset divestitures. The Group considers discretionary growth investments, which generate additional cash flows, separately from maintenance-related investments, which reflect the replacement of equipment and installations used by the Group as well as investments relating to contractual obligations. Net financial investments, as presented in the statement of changes in net financial debt, include financial investments, net of financial divestitures. Financial investments include purchases of financial assets, including the net financial debt of companies entering the scope of consolidation, and partial purchases resulting from transactions with shareholders where there is no change in control. Financial divestitures include net financial debt of companies leaving the scope of consolidation, and partial divestitures resulting from transactions with shareholders where there is no change in control, as well as issues of share capital by non-controlling interests. Net free cash flow corresponds to free cash flow from continuing operations, and is calculated by: the sum of EBITDA, dividends received, changes in operating working capital and operating cash flow from financing activities, less net interest expense, net industrial investments, taxes paid, renewal expenses, restructuring charges and other non-current expenses. Net financial debt (NFD) represents gross financial debt (non-current borrowings, current borrowings, bank overdrafts and other cash position items), net of cash and cash equivalents, liquid assets and financing-related assets, including fair value adjustments to derivatives hedging debt. Liquid assets are financial assets composed of funds or securities with an initial maturity of more than three months, easily convertible into cash, and managed with respect to a liquidity objective while maintaining a low capital risk. The leverage ratio is the ratio of closing Net Financial Debt to EBITDA. The financing rate is defined as the ratio of the cost of net financial debt (excluding fair value adjustments to instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting) to average monthly net financial debt for the period, including the cost of net financial debt of discontinued operations. The pre-tax return on capital employed (ROCE) is defined as the ratio of: Capital employed used in the ROCE calculation is therefore equal to the sum of net intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, goodwill net of impairment, operating financial assets, net operating and non-operating working capital requirements and net derivative instruments less provisions. It also includes the capital employed of activities classified within assets and liabilities held for sale, excluding discontinued operations. The post-tax return on capital employed (ROCE) is defined as the ratio of: Capital employed used in the post-tax ROCE calculation is therefore equal to the sum of net intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, goodwill net of impairment, investments in joint ventures and associates, operating financial assets, net operating and non-operating working capital requirements and net derivative instruments less provisions. It also includes the capital employed of activities classified within assets and liabilities held for sale, excluding discontinued operations. For both pre-tax and post-tax ROCE, the impacts of the Group’s investment in the Transdev Group joint venture, which is not viewed as a core Company activity and whose contribution is recognized as a share of net income of other equity-accounted entities, are excluded from the calculations. 1 Excluding representation related to IFRIC 12 fixed payments 2 At constant exchange rates At current consolidation scope and exchange rates: Revenue declined 2.3% and was stable (+0.1%) in the 4th quarter. EBITDA increased 2.0%, current EBIT increased 5.2% and current net income-Group share increased 5.1%. Excluding net financial capital gains current net income increased 13.2%. 3 At constant exchange rates 4 Equivalent to €3.4bn to €3.6bn (excluding IFRIC 12) and before taking into account the unfavorable exchange rate impacts recorded in 2016 5 Construction activities concern the Group’s engineering and construction businesses (mainly Veolia Water Technologies and SADE), as well as construction completed as part of operating contracts. 6 Including the restatement of €1,067 million of the carry-over of cash related to the pre-financing of future bond maturities in 2017.


News Article | September 29, 2016
Site: www.greencarcongress.com

« American Airlines hires investment bank Ocean Park to assist with renewable jet fuel evaluation | Main | Renault boosts range of ZOE EV to 400 km with new 41 kWh pack option » The Federal Cabinet of the Government of Canada approved the $11-billion Pacific NorthWest LNG Project following completion of a federal environmental assessment. Pacific NorthWest LNG is a proposed natural gas liquefaction and export facility on Lelu Island within the District of Port Edward on land administered by the Prince Rupert Port Authority (PRPA). The facility would liquefy and export natural gas produced by Progress Energy Canada Ltd. in northeast British Columbia. Both Pacific NorthWest LNG and Progress Energy are majority-owned by PETRONAS. Sinopec, JAPEX, Indian Oil Corporation and PetroleumBRUNEI are minority shareholders in the Pacific NorthWest LNG project. The project represents one of Canada’s largest resource development projects with a total capital investment of up to $36 billion when accounting for upstream natural gas development. The project is subject to over 190 legally binding conditions that will lessen the environmental impacts of the project. For example, Pacific NorthWest LNG Ltd. will be required to comply with mitigation measures that will minimize adverse effects on fish, fish habitat, marine mammals, wetlands, migratory birds, and human health. The project will be subject to a compliance and enforcement regime, which includes establishing environmental monitoring committees comprising Indigenous peoples, and federal and provincial representatives, for the first time. Technical experts will monitor the project and will have the authority to stop project activities that do not comply with the conditions. The decision also imposes a maximum cap on annual project greenhouse gas emissions—a maximum of 4.3 Mt of CO e per year, 900,000 tonnes less than what had initially been proposed by the proponent. In addition, upstream emissions will be reduced by the government’s commitment to regulate methane emissions from the oil and gas sector, and by British Columbia’s plan for electrification of upstream extraction of natural gas. First Ministers agreed in the Vancouver Declaration to implement policies to meet Canada’s 2030 target. As a result, emissions from all projects, including this one, must fit within Canada’s plan to meet that target, which First Ministers will discuss this Fall. British Columbia’s commitment that it will increase its carbon price in line with the Pan Canadian Framework to be announced later this Fall reflects this principle. Scientific experts from Natural Resources Canada, Transport Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada provided scientific and technical advice throughout the assessment. Indigenous peoples brought forward traditional knowledge including observations about marine conditions that prompted additional study. The review period was extended so that federal scientists could thoroughly assess the proponent’s information, require supplementary studies and review additional external research. As a result of this review, mitigation measures and monitoring requirements were put in place. Scientists found no significant effects on fish with the legally-binding mitigation and monitoring conditions. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency conducted extensive consultations throughout the environmental assessment and also provided four formal opportunities for public comments and input. More than 34,000 comments were received from individuals and groups on the draft environmental assessment report. Concerns raised by the public included effects on fish and fish habitat, the volume of greenhouse gas emissions and impacts on Indigenous rights and title. Support for the project focused on the project’s economic impact and job creation. Some communities expressed concern about the impact of increased marine shipping.


FCC catalyst additives are injected into FCC units in small amounts for the purpose of improving specific yields, enhancing product quality, or for reducing emissions from the regenerator. The main composition of FCC catalyst additives is zeolite molecular sieve, which is the active ingredient in the function process on catalyst. And there are also other ingredients in different FCC catalyst additives, such as platinum metal, palladium metal, etc. Scope of the Report:  This report focuses on the FCC Catalyst Additive Sales in Global Market, especially in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa. This report categorizes the market based on manufacturers, regions, type and application. Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers  North America (USA, Canada and Mexico)  Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy)  Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia)  South America, Middle East and Africa Market Segment by Applications, can be divided into  Vacuum Gas Oil  Residue  Others Global FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Market by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2021  1 Market Overview  1.1 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Introduction  1.2 Market Analysis by Type  1.2.1 Octane Number Improving Agent  1.2.2 Light Olefins Enhancing Agent  1.2.3 Sulphur Reducing Agent  1.3 Market Analysis by Applications  1.3.1 Vacuum Gas Oil  1.3.2 Residue  1.3.3 Others  1.4 Market Analysis by Regions  1.4.1 North America (USA, Canada and Mexico)  1.4.1.1 USA  1.4.1.2 Canada  1.4.1.3 Mexico  1.4.2 Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy)  1.4.2.1 Germany  1.4.2.2 France  1.4.2.3 UK  1.4.2.4 Russia  1.4.2.5 Italy  1.4.3 Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia)  1.4.3.1 China  1.4.3.2 Japan  1.4.3.3 Korea  1.4.3.4 India  1.4.3.5 Southeast Asia  1.4.4 South America, Middle East and Africa  1.4.4.1 Brazil  1.4.4.2 Egypt  1.4.4.3 Saudi Arabia  1.4.4.4 South Africa  1.4.4.5 Nigeria  1.5 Market Dynamics  1.5.1 Market Opportunities  1.5.2 Market Risk  1.5.3 Market Driving Force 2 Manufacturers Profiles  2.1 Grace Catalysts Technologies  2.1.1 Business Overview  2.1.2 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Type and Applications  2.1.2.1 Type 1  2.1.2.2 Type 2  2.1.3 Grace Catalysts Technologies FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share  2.2 BASF  2.2.1 Business Overview  2.2.2 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Type and Applications  2.2.2.1 Type 1  2.2.2.2 Type 2  2.2.3 BASF FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share  2.3 Albemarle  2.3.1 Business Overview  2.3.2 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Type and Applications  2.3.2.1 Type 1  2.3.2.2 Type 2  2.3.3 Albemarle FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share  2.4 Johnson Matthey (Interact)  2.4.1 Business Overview  2.4.2 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Type and Applications  2.4.2.1 Type 1  2.4.2.2 Type 2  2.4.3 Johnson Matthey (Interact) FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share  2.5 JGC C&C  2.5.1 Business Overview  2.5.2 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Type and Applications  2.5.2.1 Type 1  2.5.2.2 Type 2  2.5.3 JGC C&C FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share  2.6 Sinopec  2.6.1 Business Overview  2.6.2 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Type and Applications  2.6.2.1 Type 1  2.6.2.2 Type 2  2.6.3 Sinopec FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share  2.7 CNPC  2.7.1 Business Overview  2.7.2 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Type and Applications  2.7.2.1 Type 1  2.7.2.2 Type 2  2.7.3 CNPC FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share  2.8 Yueyang Sciensun Chemical  2.8.1 Business Overview  2.8.2 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Type and Applications  2.8.2.1 Type 1  2.8.2.2 Type 2  2.8.3 Yueyang Sciensun Chemical FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 3 Global FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Market Competition, by Manufacturer  3.1 Global FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales and Market Share by Manufacturer  3.2 Global FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Revenue and Market Share by Manufacturer  3.3 Market Concentration Rate  3.3.1 Top 3 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Manufacturer Market Share  3.3.2 Top 6 FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Manufacturer Market Share  3.4 Market Competition Trend 4 Global FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Market Analysis by Regions  4.1 Global FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales, Revenue and Market Share by Regions  4.1.1 Global FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales by Regions (2011-2016)  4.1.2 Global FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Revenue by Regions (2011-2016)  4.2 North America FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales and Growth (2011-2016)  4.3 Europe FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales and Growth (2011-2016)  4.4 Asia-Pacific FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales and Growth (2011-2016)  4.5 South America FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales and Growth (2011-2016)  4.6 Middle East and Africa FCC Catalyst Additive Sales Sales and Growth (2011-2016) Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports understand how essential statistical surveying information is for your organization or association. Therefore, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available.


News Article | November 29, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Shale Gas Market is accounted for $68.5 billion in 2015 and expected to grow at a CAGR of 9.8% to reach $132.4 billion by 2022. Factors such as ongoing research & development along with technological advancements, increasing demand of shale gas in various industries, significant number of shale reserves all over the globe are positively effecting the market growth. However, high cost involved in the production and concerns regarding methane emissions during shale gas production would limit the market growth. Shale gas could replace significant amounts of coal as an energy source further, substantial amount of shale reserves in countries such as China, Poland, Argentina and Algeria would provide an opportunity for companies to enter the shale gas market. Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing are widely employed for shale gas extraction process worldwide. Industrial applications were the leading segment in the global market. Power generation and residential application segments are anticipated to show significant growth during the forecast period. North America is leading the global production, generating the highest revenue for the global shale gas market. Asia-Pacific and Europe has tremendous potential to grow due to significant number of reserves which are untapped in countries such as China, Algeria and Indonesia. Some of the key players in global Shale Gas market are Maran Gas Maritime Inc, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Antero Resources, BHP Billiton Limited, Cabot Oil & Gas , Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Devon Energy, Encana Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, PetroChina, Reliance Industries Limited, Royal Dutch Shell, Sinopec, SM Energy , Statoil, Talisman Energy Inc , Total SA, Baker Hughes Incorporation, ConcoPhillips Co, FTS International, Inc, United Oilfield Services Inc, CONSOL Energy, BNK Petroleum Inc., and Schlumberger Limited. Applications Covered:     • Industrial and Manufacturing • Processing Type • Commercial  • Residential  • Power Generation  • Transportation Processing Equipments Covered: • Compressors & Pumps   • Electrical Machinery    • Heat Exchangers   • Internal Combustion Engines   • Measuring & Controlling Devices Regions Covered: • North America o US o Canada o Mexico • Europe o Germany o France o Italy o UK  o Spain      o Rest of Europe  • Asia Pacific o Japan        o China        o India        o Australia        o New Zealand       o Rest of Asia Pacific       • Rest of the World o Middle East o Brazil o Argentina o South Africa o Egypt What our report offers: - Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments - Market share analysis of the top industry players - Strategic recommendations for the new entrants - Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets - Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations) - Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations - Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends - Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments - Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements


News Article | November 29, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Lubricating Oils market is accounted for $38.5 million in 2015 and is expected to reach $47.7 million by 2022 growing at a CAGR of 3.1% from 2015 to 2022. Factors such as growing automobile industry, rapidly increasing industrialization & modernization of industrial machinery and globalization of technologies are propelling the market growth.  Demand for low viscosity fluids in the automotive industry, deep sea marine lubricants, and recycling of used lubricants are expected to offer major growth opportunities for the lubricant manufacturers. Manufacturing sectors such as 3D printing and medical devices will further complement lubricants industry. However, the market faces a few restraints like volatility in raw material prices and high prices of synthetic & bio-based lubricants. Declining crude oil output, strict environmental regulations and aqueous toxicity of conventional products are expected to hamper market growth. Market would face unprecedented challenges caused by new engine oil specifications and new engine tests. The utilization of lubricating oils is the highest in the automotive industry. Industrial Machinery & Equipment represent major end user for the market due to improving manufacturing PMI and increased productivity. Rising construction and infrastructure sectors for hydraulic oil, bearings, engine oil has led to high demand for commercial automotive and consumer automotive segment. Asia Pacific market was the largest in terms of volume and revenue owing to industrialization as well as eventually growing automotive, transportation and construction sectors in India and China. North America and Europe are expected to witness moderate growth. Some of the key players in global Lubricating Oils market are Exxonmobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation, Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd, Indian Oil Corp, JX Nippon Oil & Energy, Pertamina, PetroChina Company Limited, Repsol, Royal Dutch Shell PLC,SK Lubricants,Valvoline , Aegean, BP PLC, Total S.A., Sinopec Limited, Lukoil , Fuchs Petrolub AG, Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas), Lubrizol Corporation, Mident Industrial Company Ltd, Flopower Industry Company Limited, Shijiazhuang Heavy Pump Company Limited, Chongqing Tongrui Filtration Equipment Manufacturing Co. Ltd , Huntsman Corporation, Conoco Phillips Co, Ashland Incorporated, Henkel AG & Company KGaA and  Warren Oil Company Incorporated. Regions Covered: • North America o US o Canada o Mexico • Europe o Germany o France o Italy o UK  o Spain      o Rest of Europe  • Asia Pacific o Japan        o China        o India        o Australia        o New Zealand       o Rest of Asia Pacific       • Rest of the World o Middle East o Brazil o Argentina o South Africa o Egypt What our report offers: - Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments - Market share analysis of the top industry players - Strategic recommendations for the new entrants - Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets - Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations) - Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations - Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends - Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments - Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements


News Article | November 24, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Global Lubricating Oils market is accounted for $38.5 million in 2015 and is expected to reach $47.7 million by 2022 growing at a CAGR of 3.1% from 2015 to 2022. Factors such as growing automobile industry, rapidly increasing industrialization & modernization of industrial machinery and globalization of technologies are propelling the market growth. Demand for low viscosity fluids in the automotive industry, deep sea marine lubricants, and recycling of used lubricants are expected to offer major growth opportunities for the lubricant manufacturers. Manufacturing sectors such as 3D printing and medical devices will further complement lubricants industry. However, the market faces a few restraints like volatility in raw material prices and high prices of synthetic & bio-based lubricants. Declining crude oil output, strict environmental regulations and aqueous toxicity of conventional products are expected to hamper market growth. Market would face unprecedented challenges caused by new engine oil specifications and new engine tests. The utilization of lubricating oils is the highest in the automotive industry. Industrial Machinery & Equipment represent major end user for the market due to improving manufacturing PMI and increased productivity. Rising construction and infrastructure sectors for hydraulic oil, bearings, engine oil has led to high demand for commercial automotive and consumer automotive segment. Asia Pacific market was the largest in terms of volume and revenue owing to industrialization as well as eventually growing automotive, transportation and construction sectors in India and China. North America and Europe are expected to witness moderate growth. Some of the key players in global Lubricating Oils market are Exxonmobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation, Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd, Indian Oil Corp, JX Nippon Oil & Energy, Pertamina, PetroChina Company Limited, Repsol, Royal Dutch Shell PLC,SK Lubricants,Valvoline , Aegean, BP PLC, Total S.A., Sinopec Limited, Lukoil , Fuchs Petrolub AG, Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas), Lubrizol Corporation, Mident Industrial Company Ltd, Flopower Industry Company Limited, Shijiazhuang Heavy Pump Company Limited, Chongqing Tongrui Filtration Equipment Manufacturing Co. Ltd , Huntsman Corporation, Conoco Phillips Co, Ashland Incorporated, Henkel AG & Company KGaA and Warren Oil Company Incorporated.  Types Covered:  • Mineral Oil  o Crude oil  o Paraffinic oils  o Naphthenic oils  o Aromatic oils  • Synthetic Lubricants  o Esters  o Group III (Hydro Cracking)  o PAG (Polyalkylene Glycol)  o PAO (Polyalphaolefin)  • Bio-Based Lubricants  o Vegetable oils  o Animal oils  • Greases  Products Covered:  • Industrial Lubricants  o Process Oils  o General Industrial Oils  o Industrial Engine Oils  o Metal Working Fluids  • Automotive Lubricants  o Heavy-Duty Engine Oils  o Hydraulic & Transmission Fluid  o Automatic Transmission Fluid  o Passenger Vehicle Engine Oils  • Gear Oil  o Vehicle & equipment gear oil  o Industrial gear oil  • Greases  o Industrial Greases  o Vehicle & Equipment greases  End Users Covered:  • Transportation  o Passenger vehicle  o Commercial vehicle  o Aviation  o Marine  o Railways locomotives  • Industrial Machinery & Equipment  o Metalworking fluids  o Industrial gearboxes  o Hydraulic systems  o Turbines  • Power Generation  o Municipal  • Construction  • Metallurgy & Metalworking  • Mining  • Food & Beverage  • Cosmetics & Toiletries  • Chemical Industry  • Paper & Textile  Regions Covered:  • North America  o US  o Canada  o Mexico  • Europe  o Germany  o France  o Italy  o UK  o Spain  o Rest of Europe  • Asia Pacific  o Japan  o China  o India  o Australia  o New Zealand  o Rest of Asia Pacific  • Rest of the World  o Middle East  o Brazil  o Argentina  o South Africa  o Egypt What our report offers:  - Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments  - Market share analysis of the top industry players  - Strategic recommendations for the new entrants  - Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets  - Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)  - Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations  - Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends  - Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments  - Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements About Us Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports understand how essential statistical surveying information is for your organization or association. Therefore, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available.


Global Shale Gas Market is accounted for $68.5 billion in 2015 and expected to grow at a CAGR of 9.8% to reach $132.4 billion by 2022. Factors such as ongoing research & development along with technological advancements, increasing demand of shale gas in various industries, significant number of shale reserves all over the globe are positively effecting the market growth. However, high cost involved in the production and concerns regarding methane emissions during shale gas production would limit the market growth. Shale gas could replace significant amounts of coal as an energy source further, substantial amount of shale reserves in countries such as China, Poland, Argentina and Algeria would provide an opportunity for companies to enter the shale gas market. Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing are widely employed for shale gas extraction process worldwide. Industrial applications were the leading segment in the global market. Power generation and residential application segments are anticipated to show significant growth during the forecast period. North America is leading the global production, generating the highest revenue for the global shale gas market. Asia-Pacific and Europe has tremendous potential to grow due to significant number of reserves which are untapped in countries such as China, Algeria and Indonesia. Some of the key players in global Shale Gas market are Maran Gas Maritime Inc, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Antero Resources, BHP Billiton Limited, Cabot Oil & Gas , Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Devon Energy, Encana Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, PetroChina, Reliance Industries Limited, Royal Dutch Shell, Sinopec, SM Energy , Statoil, Talisman Energy Inc , Total SA, Baker Hughes Incorporation, ConcoPhillips Co, FTS International, Inc, United Oilfield Services Inc, CONSOL Energy, BNK Petroleum Inc., and Schlumberger Limited. Regions Covered:  • North America  o US  o Canada  o Mexico  • Europe  o Germany  o France  o Italy  o UK  o Spain  o Rest of Europe  • Asia Pacific  o Japan  o China  o India  o Australia  o New Zealand  o Rest of Asia Pacific  • Rest of the World  o Middle East  o Brazil  o Argentina  o South Africa  o Egypt What our report offers:  - Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments  - Market share analysis of the top industry players  - Strategic recommendations for the new entrants  - Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets  - Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)  - Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations  - Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends  - Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments  - Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements About Us Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports understand how essential statistical surveying information is for your organization or association. Therefore, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available.


Cai B.,Sinopec | Wang J.,Beijing Ruicheng Technology Co.
Natural Gas Industry | Year: 2013

The pipeline integrity management (PIM) platform established with the 3D GIS technology can provide visual basis for the decision-making of oil and gas pipeline integrity management. This paper first introduces 3D GIS technological developments and analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of leading 3D GIS products applied in digital pipelines at home and abroad, including universal GIS platform, 3D design products, and real-time visual driver. And the significance was analyzed of the independent 3D GIS products for oil and gas storage's security assurance from the information security perspective. Also, it introduced in detail the design idea, framework and functional features of the Professional Pipeline 3D GIS Platform (RAY-PIPE) with independent intellectual property rights. Based on case histories in the Sinopec's Sichuan-to-East China Pipeline Project, the functions and their characteristics of this platform were discussed in the following aspects: integrity data management, station visual management, production visual monitoring with alarm linkage, pipeline integrity assessment result display, safety and emergency management. Then it summarizes the significantly strategic promotion effects brought about by the independently-developed 3D GIS technology applied to oil and gas pipeline integrity management. In addition, it also points out that information integration, dispatch control, rsource allocation, risk control and emergency rescue can be all realized on the same platform. With this tool, the management level and working efficiency are both significantly improved; also, mass data can be collected for the PIM and thereby huge lessons and experience will be provided for cutting down the engineering cost and preparing for the following optimized pipeline management. Finally, from the perspectives of Big Data and Internet of Things (IoT), a broad prospect was described for the 3D GIS platform applications in the field of oil and gas storage and transportation.


Liu J.,Sinopec | Yu W.,Shanghai JiaoTong University | Zhou C.,Shanghai JiaoTong University
Journal of Rheology | Year: 2011

The characteristics of van Gurp-Palmen (vGP) plot for long-chain branching polymer with well-defined topological structures, including symmetric star, asymmetric star, H-shaped, and comb polymers, have been calculated by "branch-on-branch" constitutive model. It is indicated that there is only one characteristic transition in the vGP plot for nearly symmetric star polymers, but more for other chain topologies, which were deeply dependent on the topology and the molecular parameters such as side-arm length, backbone length, and number of side arms. The theoretically calculated characteristic transition points were used to construct a topology map. A feasible protocol to distinguish the topological structures of branched polymer was put forward to quantify the chain structure qualitatively and quantitatively. Such a method has been successfully proved by its application on the available data in the literature. © 2011 The Society of Rheology.


Lampe C.,Ucon Ceoconsulting | Song G.,Sinopec | Cong L.,Keeping Advanced Oiltech Ltd. | Mu X.,Sinopec
AAPG Bulletin | Year: 2012

Shengli oil field, the second largest oil and gas field in China, is located in the Tertiary Dongying graben system in the southern Bohai Basin. Three petroleum systems, one for each mapped source rock, and as many as seven reservoir rocks are documented in the Dongying graben system, representing a complex migration and accumulation pattern. In addition, both the source and the reservoir facies are distributed unevenly throughout the system, requiring a complex distribution of possible migration pathways. Stratigraphie conduits, that is, sandy and conglomeratic facies, are mostly present in the northern graben flank area, where coarse sediments provide possible migration pathways. Over most of the Basin, however, faults-active at different times throughout Basin evolution-add important additional conduits for petroleum migration, as well as acting locally as seals, depending on their surrounding lithology and their respective sealing or leaking properties through time. This article aims to show that the Shengli oil field provides an excellent example of how threedimensional petroleum systems modeling allows the assessment of fault behavior and timing to predict the distribution of hydrocarbons in a system. Copyright ©2012. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.


He J.,Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources | Wang J.,Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources | Fu X.,Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources | Zheng C.,Sinopec | Chen Y.,Hebei Iron and Steel Group Mining Design Institute
Energy Conversion and Management | Year: 2012

Qiangtang basin, which is located in the largest continuous permafrost area in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, is expected to be a strategic area of gas hydrate exploitation in China. However, relatively little work has been done on the exploration of gas hydrate in this area. In this work, we evaluated the factors controlling the formation of gas hydrate in the Tuonamu area and provided a preliminary insight into gas hydrate distribution in it on the basis of the core samples, seismic data and laboratory analysis. It can be concluded that the source rock in the deeper formation would be dominant thermogenic source for the formation of gas hydrate in Tuonamu area. The thickness of gas hydrate stable zone in this area is about 300 m. The gas hydrate in the area most probably is in the form of gas-hydrate-water. The source condition is the key factor for the formation of gas hydrate and the gas hydrate layer would be mainly present in the form of interlayer in this area. The areas around the deeper faults are the favorable targets for the exploration of gas hydrate in the Tuonamu area. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Nie H.,Sinopec | Zhang J.,China University of Geosciences | Li Y.,REPUBLIC RESOURCES
Shiyou Xuebao/Acta Petrolei Sinica | Year: 2011

Through observations, sampling and laboratory analyses of 15 black shale outcrops in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery, we studied shale-gas accumulation conditions of the Lower Cambrian black shale, such as depositional facies, types and contents of organic matter and its maturity, distribution, porosity and gas contents of the black shale etc.. Compared with major U. S. gas-producing shales, the Lower Cambrian shale in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery was characterized by great thickness, abundance of organic carbon, high maturity and elevated gas content, being capable of good geological conditions for shale-gas reservoir development. Some applied indices, such as thickness of the shale, content of organic matter, maturity and gas content, with a superimposition method of integrated information indicated that the most favorable areas for shale-gas accumulations in the Lower Cambrian shale are the southern Sichuan-northern Guizhou-central Guizhou, western Hubei-eastern Chongqing and northeast Sichuan. Based on the measured gas content, the amount of shale-gas resources in the Lower Cambrian was calculated with the volumetric method to be 3.3×10 12m 3~ 11.4×10 12m 3, with a median value of 7.4×10 12m 3.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2016-02-17

The present invention relates to a polymer/filler/metal composite fiber, including a polymer fiber comprising a metal short fiber and a filler; the metal short fiber is distributed as a dispersed phase within the polymer fiber and distributed in parallel to the axis of the polymer fiber; the filler is dispersed within the polymer fiber and distributed between the metal short fibers; the filler does not melt at the processing temperature of the polymer; said metal is a low melting point metal and selected from at least one of single component metals and metal alloys, and has a melting point which ranges from 20 to 480C, and, at the same time, which is lower than the processing temperature of the polymer; the metal short fiber and the polymer fiber have a volume ratio of from 0.01:100 to 20:100; the filler and the polymer have a weight ratio of from 0.1:100 to 30:100. The composite fiber of the present invention has reduced volume resistivity and decreased probability of broken fibers, and has a smooth surface. The present invention is simple to produce, has a lower cost, and would be easy to industrially produce in mass.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2014-09-03

The present application relates to a rubber composition, preparation method and vulcanized rubber thereof. The rubber composition comprises uncrosslinked rubber and rubber particles having crosslinked structure dispersed therein, wherein the rubber particles having crosslinked structure are synthetic rubber particles and/or natural rubber particles, e.g. one or more selected from the group consisting of natural rubber particles, styrene-butadiene rubber particles, carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubber particles, nitrile butadiene rubber particles, carboxylated nitrile butadiene rubber particles, chloroprene rubber particles, polybutadiene rubber particles, silicone rubber particles or acrylic rubber particles, styrene-butadiene-vinylpyridine rubber particles and the like, with an average particle size of 20 to 500 nm and a gel content of 60% by weight or higher, and the uncrosslinked rubber is styrene-butadiene rubber, and wherein the weight ratio of the rubber particles having crosslinked structure to the uncrosslinked rubber is 1:99-20:80. The rubber composition is obtained by mixing the components comprising uncrosslinked rubber latex and latex of rubber particles having crosslinked structure and then coagulating them. The latex of rubber particles having crosslinked structure is a rubber latex after radiation crosslinking. The vulcanized rubber of the rubber composition can be improved simultaneously in rolling resistance, wet skid resistance and wear resistance and thus can be used as high performance vehicle tread rubber.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2011-09-28

A metal loaded catalyst comprises a support and main active metal components and optional auxiliary active metal components, wherein the main active metal components are elementary substances and obtained by ionizing radiation reducing precursors of main active metal components. The catalyst can be widely used in the catalytic reactions of petrochemistry industry with high activity and selectivity. The catalyst can be used directly without being reduced preliminarily by hydrogen.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2016-08-10

The present disclosure discloses a catalyst composition for olefin polymerization, comprising the following components: a): a solid catalyst component containing magnesium, titanium, halogens, and at least one internal electron donor having a lone pair of electrons; b): an aluminum alkyl compound; and c): an external electron donor containing a first external electron donor C1, which is a malonate compound. In the present disclosure, a catalyst composition having an external electron donor that contains a malonate compound is used in olefin polymerization, in particular propene polymerization, and can significantly improve catalytic activity and hydrogen response of the catalyst and expand molecular weight distribution of polymers, which facilitates development of different polymers.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2016-05-04

A polyethylene composition comprising an ethylene/-olefin copolymerized linear low density polyethylene, wherein the polyethylene composition has a Mw of from 100,000 g/mol to 200,000 g/mol, a Mw/Mn of from 4.0 to 9.0, a Mz/Mw of from 4.0 to 7.0, and a Mz+1/Mw of from 4.5 to 13.5, , is provided. A film formed of the polyethylene composition is also provided.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2016-08-24

The present invention provides a catalyst component for olefin polymerization and a preparation method thereof, and a catalyst for olefin polymerization and an application thereof. The catalyst component for olefin polymerization comprises reaction products of the following components: (1) a solid component; (2) at least one titanium compound; and (3) at least two internal electron donors, wherein the solid component comprises a magnesium compound represented by formula (1) and an epoxide represented by formula (2), wherein R_(1) is a C_(1)-C_(12) linear or branched alkyl; R_(2) and R_(3) are identical or different, and are independently hydrogen or unsubstituted or halogen-substituted C_(1)-C_(5) linear or branched alkyl; X is halogen; m is in a range of from 0.1 to 1.9, n is in a range of from 0.1 to 1.9, and m+n=2.


Spherical carriers for an olefin polymerization catalyst, catalyst components, catalysts, and preparation methods therefor are disclosed. The method for preparing the spherical carriers comprises the following steps: (1) reacting, in the presence of at least one polymeric dispersion stabilizer, a magnesium halide with an organic compound containing active hydrogen to form a complex solution; (2) reacting said complex solution with an alkylene oxide-type compound to directly precipitate solid particles; and (3) recovering the solid particles to obtain spherical carriers. When a catalyst prepared by using the present spherical carrier is used in propylene polymerization, said catalyst exhibits high polymerization activity and high stereo-directing ability.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2012-08-22

A catalyst component for olefin polymerization is disclosed, which comprises a reaction product of the following components: (1) a spheric carrier; (2) a titanium compound; and optionally, (3) an electron donor, wherein the spheric carrier comprises a reaction product of at least the following components: (a) a magnesium halide represented by a general formula of MgX_(2-n)R_(n), wherein X is independently chloride or bromide, R is a C_(1)-C_(14) alkyl, a C_(6)-C_(14) aryl, a C_(1)-C_(14) alkoxy, or a C_(6)-C_(14) aryloxy, and n is 0 or 1; (b) an alcohol compound; and (c) an epoxy compound represented by a general formula (I), wherein R_(2) and R_(3) are independently hydrogen, a C_(1)-C_(5) linear or branched alkyl, or a C_(1)-C_(5) linear or branched haloalkyl. When the catalyst of the invention is used in olefin polymerization, in particular in propylene polymerization, at least one of the following desired effects can be achieved: high polymerization activity of catalyst, high stereospecificity of catalyst, good hydrogen response of catalyst, high stereoregularity of polymer having high melt index, and low content of polymer fines.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2013-05-01

The present invention relates to a propylene-butene-1 random copolymer which has a butene-1 content of 1-6 mol% and a relative dispersity of butene-1, as determined according to NMR method, of greater than 98.5%. The propylene-butene-1 random copolymer of the present invention has a high relative dispersity of butene-1, as well as better transparency and heat resistance, so that it is more suitable for packaging food that may be edible after heating. Moreover, the copolymer has a lower xylene solubles content at room temperature. In addition, the present invention further relates to a method for preparing the copolymer and to a composition and an article comprising the copolymer.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2016-11-09

The present invention relates to the field of lubricant, and specifically provides a lubricant composition and its preparation method and use. The lubricant composition comprises a base oil and rubber particles having radiation crosslinked structure dispersed therein, wherein the base oil is continuous phase and the rubber particles are dispersed phase. The viscosity of the lubricant composition of the present invention can be effectively adjusted as temperature changes. As compared with the lubricant composition comprising chemically crosslinked rubber particles, it has a lower viscosity at low temperatures and a higher viscosity at high temperatures, and has a relatively high viscosity index, which can meet the application requirements at the temperature above 200C. In addition, the lubricant composition of the present invention also has excellent antiwear and friction-reducing properties.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2011-12-28

A process for preparing 2,3-di(non-linear-alkyl)-2-cyanosuccinate compounds, especially 2,3-diisopropyl-2-cyanosuccinate compounds, and processes for preparing 2.3-di(non-linear-alkyl)succinic acids and esters thereof by using the 2,3-di-non-linear propyl-2-cyanosuccinate compounds as intermediates are disclosed.


The present application relates to a modified rubber masterbatch and preparation method thereof, rubber composition prepared therewith and vulcanized rubber and preparation method thereof. The modified rubber component comprises uncrosslinked rubber and rubber particles having crosslinked structure dispersed therein, wherein the rubber particles having crosslinked structure are synthetic rubber particles and/or natural rubber particles, have an average particle size of 20-500 nm and a gel content of 60% by weight or higher, and wherein the uncrosslinked rubber is styrene-butadiene rubber. The weight ratio of the rubber particles having crosslinked structure to the uncrosslinked rubber is greater than 20:80 and less than or equal to 80:20. The rubber composition comprises a blend of modified rubber component and base rubber, in which the modified rubber masterbatch is present in an amount of 1 to 70 parts by weight, relative to per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber. The vulcanized rubber of the rubber composition has not only low rolling resistance and excellent wet skid resistance, but also excellent wear resistance, and thus can be used for producing high performance tread rubber.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2012-08-22

A spheric magnesium compound comprises a reaction product of at least the following components: (a) a magnesium halide having a formula of MgX_(2-n)R_(n), wherein X is independently chloride or bromide, R is a C_(1)-C_(14) alkyl, a C_(6)-C_(14) aryl, a C_(1)-C_(14) alkoxy, or a C_(6)-C_(14) aryloxy, and n is 0 or 1; (b) an alcohol compound; and (c) an epoxy compound having a general formula (I), wherein R_(2) and R_(3) are independently hydrogen, a C_(1)-C_(5) linear or branched alkyl, or a C_(1)-C_(5) linear or branched haloalkyl. The magnesium compound has characteristic DSC curve and X-ray diffraction pattern, and can be used as a carrier for olefin polymerization catalyst.


Patent
China Petroleum&Chemical Corporation and Sinopec | Date: 2016-10-12

The present invention relates to a resin composition having improved haze and light transmittance in the technical field of polymer materials and the process for preparing the same. The resin composition is characterized by comprising the following blended components: a. matrix resin; and b. crosslinked copolymer microspheres; wherein the crosslinked copolymer microspheres are alternating copolymers formed from monomers having anhydride, amide and/or imide groups, with olefin monomers and/or furan and its derivatives and optionally crosslinked with a crosslinking agent; preferably, the resin composition has a haze of not less than 92%, and a light transmittance of not less than 55%, preferably a haze of not less than 92%, and a light transmittance of not less than 59%, and more preferably a haze of not less than 95%, and a light transmittance of not less than 59%. The resin composition of the present invention can save a lot of energy while achieving excellent light diffusing effect, and at the same time reduces the material cost and can be easily industrially produced in mass.


News Article | November 2, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

MarketStudyReport.com adds “Polyethylene Global Market Briefing 2016” new report to its research database. The report spread across 35 pages with table and figures in it. Polyethylene, also known as polyethene is a common type of plastic. Establishments in the polyethylene industry produce polyethylene by the polymerization of ethylene in the presence of catalysts. Polyethylene is primarily used in the packaging industry for manufacture of plastic bags, films, containers, bottles and others. The Polyethylene Global Market Briefing provides strategists, marketers and senior management with the critical information they need to assess the polyethylene sector. Description The Polyethylene Global Market Briefing Report from the Business Research Company covers market characteristics, size and growth, segmentation, regional breakdowns, competitive landscape, market shares, trends and strategies for this market. The market characteristics section of the report defines and explains the market. The market size section gives the polyethylene market revenues, covering both the historic growth of the market and forecasting the future. Drivers and restraints looks at the external factors supporting and controlling the growth of the market. Market segmentations break down the key sub sectors which make up the market. The regional breakdowns section gives the size of the market geographically. Competitive landscape gives a description of the competitive nature of the market, market shares, and a description of the leading companies. Key financial deals which have shaped the market in the last three years are identified. The trends and strategies section highlights the likely future developments in the polyethylene market and suggests approaches. Browse full table of contents and data tables at https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/polyethylene-global-market-briefing-2016/ Reasons to Purchase - Get up to date information available on the polyethylene market globally. - Identify growth segments and opportunities. - Facilitate decision making on the basis of historic and forecast data and understand the drivers and restraints on the market. - Develop strategies based on likely future developments. - Gain a global perspective on the development of the market. - Report will be updated with the latest data and delivered to you within 3-5 working days of order. Scope Markets Covered: High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE), Linear Low Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) Companies Mentioned: BASF, Borealis, Braskem, Dow, ExxonMobil, LyondellBassell, SABIC, Shell, Sinopec, and Total Geographic scope: Americas, Europe, Asia, Middle East and Africa, Oceania. Time series: Five years historic and forecast. Data: Market value in $ billions. Data segmentations: Regional breakdowns, market share of competitors, key sub segments. Sourcing and Referencing: Data and analysis throughout the report is sourced using end notes. Polyethylene, also known as polyethene is a common type of plastic. Establishments in the polyethylene industry produce polyethylene by the polymerization of ethylene in the presence of catalysts. Polyethylene is primarily used in the packaging industry for manufacture of plastic bags, films, containers, bottles and others. The Polyethylene Global Market Briefing provides strategists, marketers and senior management with the critical information they need to assess the polyethylene sector. The Americas was the x largest geographic region in the specialty doctors market in 2015, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. Asia was the x largest geographic market, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. Europe was the x largest geographic market, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. The Middle East and Africa accounted for x% and $x billion, while Oceania accounted for x% of the global specialty doctors market. To receive personalized assistance write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150


News Article | November 3, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

MarketStudyReport.com adds “Cumene/Phenol And Acetone Global Market Briefing 2016” new report to its research database. The report spread across 35 pages with table and figures in it. The cumene/phenol and acetone industry consists of establishments involved in the production of aromatic organic compounds cumene, phenol and acetone. Acetone is obtained as a by-product in the production of phenol by partial oxidation of cumene. These chemical compounds are used in industries such as medical, plastics, cosmetics and to produce other chemicals. The Cumene/Phenol And Acetone Global Market Briefing provides strategists, marketers and senior management with the critical information they need to assess the cumene/phenol and acetone sector. Description The Cumene/Phenol And Acetone Global Market Briefing Report from the Business Research Company covers market characteristics, size and growth, segmentation, regional breakdowns, competitive landscape, market shares, trends and strategies for this market. The market characteristics section of the report defines and explains the market. The market size section gives the cumene/phenol and acetone market revenues, covering both the historic growth of the market and forecasting the future. Drivers and restraints looks at the external factors supporting and controlling the growth of the market. Market segmentations break down the key sub sectors which make up the market. The regional breakdowns section gives the size of the market geographically. Competitive landscape gives a description of the competitive nature of the market, market shares, and a description of the leading companies. Key financial deals which have shaped the market in the last three years are identified. The trends and strategies section highlights the likely future developments in the cumene/phenol and acetone market and suggests approaches. Browse full table of contents and data tables at https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/cumenephenol-and-acetone-global-market-briefing-2016/ Reasons to Purchase - Get up to date information available on the cumene/phenol and acetone market globally. - Identify growth segments and opportunities. - Facilitate decision making on the basis of historic and forecast data and understand the drivers and restraints on the market. - Develop strategies based on likely future developments. - Gain a global perspective on the development of the market. - Report will be updated with the latest data and delivered to you within 3-5 working days of order. Scope Markets Covered: Alkyphenol, Aniline, Bisphenol A, Cyclohexanol/one, MMA, Other Phenol, Phenol Formaldehyde Resins, Others Companies Mentioned: BASF SE, BP PLC, Total SA, Exxonmobil Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Company, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, China National Petroleum Corporation, JX Nippon Oil and Energy Group, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Saudi Arabia Basic Industries Corporation, Sinopec Limited, and INEOS Group Geographic scope: Americas, Europe, Asia, Middle East and Africa, Oceania. Time series: Five years historic and forecast. Data: Market value in $ billions. Data segmentations: Regional breakdowns, market share of competitors, key sub segments. Sourcing and Referencing: Data and analysis throughout the report is sourced using end notes. The cumene/phenol and acetone industry consists of establishments involved in the production of aromatic organic compounds cumene, phenol and acetone. Acetone is obtained as a by-product in the production of phenol by partial oxidation of cumene. These chemical compounds are used in industries such as medical, plastics, cosmetics and to produce other chemicals. The Cumene/Phenol And Acetone Global Market Briefing provides strategists, marketers and senior management with the critical information they need to assess the cumene/phenol and acetone sector. The Americas was the x largest geographic region in the specialty doctors market in 2015, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. Asia was the x largest geographic market, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. Europe was the x largest geographic market, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. The Middle East and Africa accounted for x% and $x billion, while Oceania accounted for x% of the global specialty doctors market. To receive personalized assistance write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150


News Article | October 31, 2016
Site: www.prnewswire.co.uk

WUXI, China, 31. Oktober 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Die IoT-Weltmesse findet vom 30. Oktober bis zum 1. November 2016 in Wuxi statt. Die Messe ist eine Gemeinschaftsinitiative des chinesischen Ministeriums für Industrie und Informationstechnologie, des chinesischen Ministeriums für Wissenschaft und Technik und der Volksregierung der Provinz Jiangsu. Sie wird von der Chinesischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (CAS), der Internationalen Fernmeldeunion (ITU), dem Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), dem Global Standard 1 (GS1) und Auto-ID Labs unterstützt und ist die größte und renommierteste landesweite Messe des Internet-der-Dinge-Sektors in China. Die Internationale Chinesische IoT-Messe findet seit 2010 im Jahresrhythmus statt und hat seither einen hohen Bekanntheitsgrad erlangt. Im Oktober dieses Jahres hat sie sich mit Genehmigung des Zentralkomitees der Kommunistischen Partei Chinas und des Staatsrats der Volksrepublik China zur Weltmesse für das Internet der Dinge umbenannt. Im Vergleich zu früheren Jahren ist die Messe größer mit renommierteren Teilnehmern und fortschrittlicheren Technologien. Verschiedene Ausstellungen und aufgewertete Technologien machen die Veranstaltung zu einem Neubeginn für die Internet-der-Dinge-Messe. Die Messe mit dem Motto „IoT-Ära einläuten, globale Intelligenz teilen" umfasst verschiedene Aktivitäten wie beispielsweise den IoT-Wuxi-Gipfel, die zentrale Ausstellung für IoT-Anwendungen und -Produkte, den nationalen chinesischen Hochschul-Innovationswettbewerb für IoT-Anwendungen und das 4. Treffen der Lenkungsgruppe der Wuxi National Sensor Network Innovation Demonstration Zone. Am IoT-Wuxi-Gipfel nahmen einheimische und internationale Gäste teil. Grundsatzreden gab es von Zhang Xiaogang, Präsident der Internationalen Organisation für Normung (ISO), und Malcolm Johnson, stellvertretender Generalsekretär der Internationalen Fernmeldeunion (ITU). Zu den Rednern zählten außerdem Khalil Najafi, Professor am Fachbereich Electrical and Computer Engineering an der University of Michigan, Nadia Magnenat Thalmann, Gründerin und Leiterin des MIRALab-Forschungslabors an der Universität Genf, Alain Crozier, Leiter und CEO von Microsoft Greater China Region, Wu Hequan, Mitglied der Chinesischen Akademie der Ingenieurwissenschaften, Wang Jian, Chief Technology Officer bei Alibaba, Zhang Shunmao, Präsident von Huawei Marketing and Solutions, und Liu Haitao, Vorsitzender der World Sensing Net Group (WSN Group). Neben einem IoT-Wettbewerb für Hochschulstudenten und einer Jobbörse gab es eine Pressekonferenz, bei der der Bauplan für eine zukunftsweisende „Internet-der-Dinge-Stadt" enthüllt wurde, um die Entwicklung der IoT-Branche in Wuxi voranzubringen. Die Messe zählte über 3.000 Gäste aus 23 Ländern und Regionen, darunter 10 Ministeriumsleiter und 24 Mitglieder der Chinesischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Chinesischen Akademie der Ingenieurwissenschaften, Vorsitzende internationaler Gesellschaften, der Erfinder des integrierten CMOS-Schaltkreises und der Gründer des MEMS-Forschungszentrums in Singapur. Zu den Gästen gehörten darüber hinaus Führungskräfte von Staatsbetrieben wie China Railway, State Grid, Sinopec, PetroChina und Aviation Industry Corporation of China. Anwesend waren zudem Professoren des MIT, der University of Colorado, University of Michigan, University of Cincinnati, University of Washington, Universität Genf und Tsinghua-Universität. Dem Event beiwohnen werden außerdem Technologieleiter von internationalen Unternehmen wie IBM, Siemens, Microsoft, Bosch, GE, Nokia, NTT, SK Telecom, ARM, Kaspersky, Honeywell und Tesla Motors und einheimischen Unternehmen wie China Mobile, China Telecom, China Unicom, Huawei, Lenovo, Inspur, Haier, Midea, Foxconn, Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent, JD.com, Qihoo 360 und Neusoft. Mit einer von 32.000 m2 auf 50.000 m2 vergrößerten Ausstellungsfläche finden auf der Messe 489 Aussteller Platz, die den Besuchern über interaktive Displays interessante Technologieanwendungen und Praxisbeispiele präsentieren werden. Unter den Messeteilnehmern finden sich Namen wie IBM, Siemens, OMRON, ARM, Infineon Technologies, China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom, XCMG, China North Industries Group Corporation, Aisino Corporation, Huawei, ZTE, Alibaba, Tencent, JD.com, AsiaInfo, Hikvision und Lenovo.


Market Research Report on Ethylene Oxide market 2016 is a professional and in-depth study on the current state of the Ethylene Oxide worldwide. First of all,"Global Ethylene Oxide Market 2016" report provides a basic overview of the Ethylene Oxide industry including definitions, classifications, applications and Ethylene Oxide industry chain structure. The analysis is provided for the Ethylene Oxide international market including development history, Ethylene Oxide industry competitive landscape analysis.  This report "Worldwide Ethylene Oxide Market 2016" also states import/export, supply and consumption figures and Ethylene Oxide market cost, price, revenue and Ethylene Oxide market's gross margin by regions (United States, EU, China and Japan), as well as other regions can be added in Ethylene Oxide Market area. Major Manufacturers are covered in this research report are Sinopec CNPC Liaoning Oxiranchem Jilin Zhongxin Chemical Group Shandong Lianhong CNOOC-Shell China Sanjiang Fine Chemicals Company SINOPEC SABIC Tianjin Petrochemical This report studies Ethylene Oxide in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with sales, price, revenue and market share. Then, the report focuses on worldwide Ethylene Oxide market key players with information such as company profiles with product picture as well as specification. Related information to Ethylene Oxide market- capacity, production, price, cost, revenue and contact information. Aslo includes Ethylene Oxide industry's - Upstream raw materials, equipment and downstream consumers analysis is also carried out. What’s more, the Ethylene Oxide market development trends and Ethylene Oxide industry marketing channels are analyzed. Finally, "Worldwide Ethylene Oxide Market" Analysis- feasibility of new investment projects is assessed, and overall research conclusions are offered.


News Article | November 16, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

MarketStudyReport.com adds “Global PBT Market by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2021” new report to its research database. The report spread across 106 pages with table and figures in it. PBT is a semi-crystalline, whTechnologye or off-whTechnologye polyester similar in both composTechnologyion and properties to polyethyleneterephthalate (PET). Technology is a thermoplastic engineering polymer that is used as an insulator in the electrical, electronics, automobile, mechanical equipment and precision instruments industries. Compared to PET (polyethylene terephthalate), PBT has slightly lower strength and rigidTechnologyy, slightly better impact resistance, and a slightly lower glass transTechnologyion temperature. Scope of the Report: This report focuses on the PBT in Global market, especially in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa. This report categorizes the market based on manufacturers, regions, type and application. Market Segment by Manufacturers, this report covers Changchun BASF Sabic DuBay Polymer (Lanxess, DuPont) Ticona (Celanese) DuPont Kanghui MTechnologysubishi HNEC WinTech (Polyplastics,Teijin) Toray BlueStar Yizheng (Sinopec) Blueridge Shinkong DSM Sipchem Nan Ya Heshili Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Technologyaly) Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) South America, Middle East and Africa Market Segment by Type, covers Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Market Segment by Applications, can be divided into Electrical and electronics Automobile industry Mechanical equipment Other products Browse full table of contents and data tables at https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-pbt-market-by-manufacturers-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2021/ There are 13 Chapters to deeply display the global PBT market. Chapter 1, to describe PBT Introduction, product scope, market overview, market opportunTechnologyies, market risk, market driving force; Chapter 2, to analyze the top manufacturers of PBT, wTechnologyh sales, revenue, and price of PBT, in 2015 and 2016; Chapter 3, to display the competTechnologyive sTechnologyuation among the top manufacturers, wTechnologyh sales, revenue and market share in 2015 and 2016; Chapter 4, to show the global market by regions, wTechnologyh sales, revenue and market share of PBT, for each region, from 2011 to 2016; Chapter 5, 6, 7 and 8, to analyze the key regions, wTechnologyh sales, revenue and market share by key countries in these regions; Chapter 9 and 10, to show the market by type and application, wTechnologyh sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2011 to 2016; Chapter 11, PBT market forecast, by regions, type and application, wTechnologyh sales and revenue, from 2016 to 2021; Chapter 12 and 13, to describe PBT sales channel, distributors, traders, dealers, appendix and data source. To receive personalized assistance write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150


News Article | November 8, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes: Sales, means the sales volume of AAAA Revenue, means the sales value of AAAA This report studies sales (consumption) of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering BASF Dow Huntsman Shell SABIC AkzoNobel, Farsa Chemical Formosa Plastics Group Ineos Oxide LyondellBasell Industries Reliance Industries Limited Sinopec ... Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like USA China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol in each application, can be divided into Infrastructure and construction Power Railway Industrial machinery Oil and gas Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Market Report 2016 1 Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol 1.2 Classification of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol 1.3.1 Infrastructure and construction 1.3.2 Power 1.3.3 Railway 1.3.4 Industrial machinery 1.3.5 Oil and gas 1.4 Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Market by Regions 1.4.1 USA Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application 2.1 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1.1 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.1.2 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.2 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol (Volume and Value) by Type 2.2.1 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.2.2 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.3 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol (Volume and Value) by Regions 2.3.1 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.3.2 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.4 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Table Classification of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Figure Global Sales Market Share of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol by Type in 2015 Figure Type I Picture Figure Type II Picture Table Applications of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Figure Global Sales Market Share of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol by Application in 2015 Figure Infrastructure and construction Examples Figure Power Examples Figure Railway Examples Figure Industrial machinery Examples Figure Oil and gas Examples Figure USA Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure China Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Europe Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Japan Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Figure 2015 Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Share by Manufacturers Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table 2015 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2016 Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Revenue Market Share of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Share by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Growth Rate by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue Share by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Revenue Market Share of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue Growth Rate by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Market Share by Application (2011-2016) Table Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Share by Application (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol by Application (2011-2016) Figure Global Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Growth Rate by Application (2011-2016) Figure USA Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2016) Figure USA Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2016) Figure USA Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Price Trend (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US @ Ethylene Oxide and Ethylene Glycol Sales Global Market Research Report 2016


News Article | December 6, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes:  Sales, means the sales volume of Chemical Accelerators  Revenue, means the sales value of Chemical Accelerators This report studies sales (consumption) of Chemical Accelerators in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering  Akzonobel N.V  BASF SE  Lanxess AG  Solvay SA  Arkema SA  China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec Corp.)  Eastman Chemical Company  R. T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc  Emery Oleochemicals Llc  Behn Meyer Group  Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Chemical Accelerators in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  United States  China  Europe  Japan  Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Type I  Type II  Type III  Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Chemical Accelerators in each application, can be divided into  Application 1  Application 2  Application 3 Global Chemical Accelerators Sales Market Report 2016  1 Chemical Accelerators Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Chemical Accelerators  1.2 Classification of Chemical Accelerators  1.2.1 Type I  1.2.2 Type II  1.2.3 Type III  1.3 Application of Chemical Accelerators  1.3.1 Application 1  1.3.2 Application 2  1.3.3 Application 3  1.4 Chemical Accelerators Market by Regions  1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Chemical Accelerators (2011-2021)  1.5.1 Global Chemical Accelerators Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  1.5.2 Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Chemical Accelerators Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application  2.1 Global Chemical Accelerators Market Competition by Manufacturers  2.1.1 Global Chemical Accelerators Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016)  2.1.2 Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  2.2 Global Chemical Accelerators (Volume and Value) by Type  2.2.1 Global Chemical Accelerators Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  2.2.2 Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  2.3 Global Chemical Accelerators (Volume and Value) by Regions  2.3.1 Global Chemical Accelerators Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016)  2.3.2 Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016)  2.4 Global Chemical Accelerators (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of Chemical Accelerators  Table Classification of Chemical Accelerators  Figure Global Sales Market Share of Chemical Accelerators by Type in 2015  Figure Type I Picture  Figure Type II Picture  Table Applications of Chemical Accelerators  Figure Global Sales Market Share of Chemical Accelerators by Application in 2015  Figure Application 1 Examples  Figure Application 2 Examples  Figure United States Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure China Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Europe Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Japan Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Global Chemical Accelerators Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Figure 2015 Chemical Accelerators Sales Share by Manufacturers  Figure 2016 Chemical Accelerators Sales Share by Manufacturers  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table 2015 Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue Share by Manufacturers  Table 2016 Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue Share by Manufacturers  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Sales Share by Type (2011-2016)  Figure Sales Market Share of Chemical Accelerators by Type (2011-2016)  Figure Global Chemical Accelerators Sales Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016)  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue Share by Type (2011-2016)  Figure Revenue Market Share of Chemical Accelerators by Type (2011-2016)  Figure Global Chemical Accelerators Revenue Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016)  Table Global Chemical Accelerators Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US @ Chemical Accelerators Sales Global Market Research Report 2016


News Article | November 8, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes: Sales, means the sales volume of ABS Resin Revenue, means the sales value of ABS Resin This report studies sales (consumption) of ABS Resin in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Chi Mei BASF INEOS LG Chemical SABIC Lotte Advanced Materials Toray Dow Formosa Chemicals & Fibre JSR Kumho PetroChemical PCC IRPC Elix Polymers HKNH Sinopec Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of ABS Resin in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America China Europe Japan Southeast Asia India Split by product types, with sales, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Flame-retardant Grade Board Grade High Impact Grade Others Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of ABS Resin in each application, can be divided into Pipe and Pipe Fittings Office Equipment Car Accessories Home Applications Others 1 ABS Resin Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of ABS Resin 1.2 Classification of ABS Resin 1.2.1 1.2.2 Flame-retardant Grade 1.2.3 Board Grade 1.2.4 High Impact Grade 1.2.5 Others 1.3 Applications of ABS Resin 1.3.1 Pipe and Pipe Fittings 1.3.2 Office Equipment 1.3.3 Car Accessories 1.3.4 Home Applications 1.3.5 Others 1.4 ABS Resin Market by Regions 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of ABS Resin (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global ABS Resin Sales, Revenue and Price (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global ABS Resin Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.3 Global ABS Resin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global ABS Resin Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application 2.1 Global ABS Resin Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1.1 Global ABS Resin Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.1.2 Global ABS Resin Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.2 Global ABS Resin (Volume and Value) by Type 2.2.1 Global ABS Resin Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2021) 2.2.2 Global ABS Resin Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2021) 2.3 Global ABS Resin (Volume and Value) by Regions 2.3.1 Global ABS Resin Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2021) 2.3.2 Global ABS Resin Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2021) 2.4 Global ABS Resin (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of ABS Resin Table Classification of ABS Resin Figure Global Sales Market Share of ABS Resin by n 2015 Figure Flame-retardant Grade Picture Figure Board Grade Picture Figure High Impact Grade Picture Figure Others Picture Table Applications of ABS Resin Figure Global Sales Market Share of ABS Resin by Applications in 2015 Figure Pipe and Pipe Fittings Examples Figure Office Equipment Examples Figure Car Accessories Examples Figure Home Applications Examples Figure Others Examples Figure North America ABS Resin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure China ABS Resin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Europe ABS Resin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Japan ABS Resin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Southeast Asia ABS Resin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure India ABS Resin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global ABS Resin Sales, Revenue and Price (2011-2021) Figure Global ABS Resin Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global ABS Resin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global ABS Resin Sales of Key Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) Table Global ABS Resin Sales Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) Figure 2015 ABS Resin Sales Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 ABS Resin Sales Share by Manufacturers Table Global ABS Resin Revenue by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) Table Global ABS Resin Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) Table 2015 Global ABS Resin Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2016 Global ABS Resin Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global ABS Resin Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2021) Table Global ABS Resin Sales Share by Type (2011-2021) Figure Sales Market Share of ABS Resin by Type (2011-2021) Figure Global ABS Resin Sales Growth Rate by Type (2011-2021) Table Global ABS Resin Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2021) Table Global ABS Resin Revenue Share by Type (2011-2021) Figure Revenue Market Share of ABS Resin by Type (2011-2021) Figure Global ABS Resin Revenue Growth Rate by Type (2011-2021) Table Global ABS Resin Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2021) Table Global ABS Resin Sales Share by Regions (2011-2021) Figure Sales Market Share of ABS Resin by Regions (2011-2021) Figure Global ABS Resin Sales Growth Rate by Regions (2011-2021) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US @  ABS Resin Sales Global Market Research Report to 2021


Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Coal Gasification -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database This report studies sales (consumption) of Coal Gasification in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Coal Gasification in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like United States China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Coal Gasification in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Coal Gasification Sales Market Report 2016 1 Coal Gasification Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Coal Gasification 1.2 Classification of Coal Gasification 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Coal Gasification 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Coal Gasification Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Coal Gasification (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Coal Gasification Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Coal Gasification Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 7 Global Coal Gasification Manufacturers Analysis 7.1 GE 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.1.2 Coal Gasification Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Type I 7.1.2.2 Type II 7.1.3 GE Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Shell 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.2.2 119 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Type I 7.2.2.2 Type II 7.2.3 Shell Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Siemens 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.3.2 134 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Type I 7.3.2.2 Type II 7.3.3 Siemens Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Lurgi (Air Liquide) 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.4.2 Nov Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Type I 7.4.2.2 Type II 7.4.3 Lurgi (Air Liquide) Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Synthesis Energy Systems (SES) 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Type I 7.5.2.2 Type II 7.5.3 Synthesis Energy Systems (SES) Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Advantica Group 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Type I 7.6.2.2 Type II 7.6.3 Advantica Group Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Sedin Engineering 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.7.2 Energy Product Type, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Type I 7.7.2.2 Type II 7.7.3 Sedin Engineering Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 CHOREN 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Type I 7.8.2.2 Type II 7.8.3 CHOREN Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Taiyuan Coal Gasification 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Type I 7.9.2.2 Type II 7.9.3 Taiyuan Coal Gasification Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 Yankuang Group 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Type I 7.10.2.2 Type II 7.10.3 Yankuang Group Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 Liuzhou Chemical Industry 7.12 Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec Group) 7.13 Shanxi Lanhua Coal Industry Group 7.14 Yunan Yuntianhua 7.15 Heilongjiang Longmei Mining Holding Group 7.16 Henan Jinkai Investment Holding Group 7.17 LUXI Group 7.18 Ruixing 7.19 Henan Coal Industry Chemical Industry Group 7.20 Cheng Feng Petrochemical


News Article | November 3, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes:  Sales, means the sales volume of Polypropylene Film  Revenue, means the sales value of Polypropylene Film This report studies sales (consumption) of Polypropylene Film in Global market, especially in USA, China, Europe, Japan, India and Southeast Asia, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering  Ampacet  ANDRITZ AG  Baojiali  Baoshuo  Baosu  Biofilm  Changhai  CNPC Fushun  Cosmo  Dagang Petrochemical  Decro  Dunmore  Formosa Plastics  FSPG  FUTAMURA  Granwell  Guofeng  Impex Global  Innovia  Kopafilm  MIRWEC Film  Mitsui  Nanya Plastics  Oji’s Alphan  SABIC  Sanyoung  Shenda  Sinopec  Stenta Films  Suenyang  Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Polypropylene Film in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  USA  China  Europe  Japan  India  Southeast Asia  Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Cast Polypropylene (CPP) Film  Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene (BOPP) film  Inflated polypropylene (IPP) Film  Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Polypropylene Film in each application, can be divided into  Industrial applications (capacitors and adhesive tapes, etc.)  Consumer packaged goods (CPG) (Food, overwrap, gift paper, flower wrap, etc.)  Application 3 Global Polypropylene Film Sales Market Report 2016  1 Polypropylene Film Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Polypropylene Film  1.2 Classification of Polypropylene Film  1.2.1 Cast Polypropylene (CPP) Film  1.2.2 Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene (BOPP) film  1.2.3 Inflated polypropylene (IPP) Film  1.3 Application of Polypropylene Film  1.3.1 Industrial applications (capacitors and adhesive tapes, etc.)  1.3.2 Consumer packaged goods (CPG) (Food, overwrap, gift paper, flower wrap, etc.)  1.3.3 Application 3  1.4 Polypropylene Film Market by Regions  1.4.1 USA Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.5 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Polypropylene Film (2011-2021)  1.5.1 Global Polypropylene Film Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  1.5.2 Global Polypropylene Film Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Polypropylene Film Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application  2.1 Global Polypropylene Film Market Competition by Manufacturers  2.1.1 Global Polypropylene Film Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016)  2.1.2 Global Polypropylene Film Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  2.2 Global Polypropylene Film (Volume and Value) by Type  2.2.1 Global Polypropylene Film Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  2.2.2 Global Polypropylene Film Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  2.3 Global Polypropylene Film (Volume and Value) by Regions GET EXCLUSIVE DISCOUNT ON THIS REPORT @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/check-discount/721645-global-polypropylene-film-sales-market-report-2016 Figure Picture of Polypropylene Film  Table Classification of Polypropylene Film  Figure Global Sales Market Share of Polypropylene Film by Type in 2015  Figure Cast Polypropylene (CPP) Film Picture  Figure Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene (BOPP) film Picture  Figure Inflated polypropylene (IPP) Film Picture  Table Applications of Polypropylene Film  Figure Global Sales Market Share of Polypropylene Film by Application in 2015  Figure Industrial applications (capacitors and adhesive tapes, etc.) Examples  Figure Consumer packaged goods (CPG) (Food, overwrap, gift paper, flower wrap, etc.) Examples  Figure USA Polypropylene Film Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure China Polypropylene Film Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Europe Polypropylene Film Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Japan Polypropylene Film Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure India Polypropylene Film Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Southeast Asia Polypropylene Film Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Global Polypropylene Film Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Global Polypropylene Film Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Table Global Polypropylene Film Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table Global Polypropylene Film Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Figure 2015 Polypropylene Film Sales Share by Manufacturers  Figure 2016 Polypropylene Film Sales Share by Manufacturers  Table Global Polypropylene Film Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table Global Polypropylene Film Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table 2015 Global Polypropylene Film Revenue Share by Manufacturers  Table 2016 Global Polypropylene Film Revenue Share by Manufacturers  Table Global Polypropylene Film Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  Table Global Polypropylene Film Sales Share by Type (2011-2016)  Figure Sales Market Share of Polypropylene Film by Type (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/721645-global-polypropylene-film-sales-market-report-2016


Notes: Production, means the output of Synthetic Lubricants Revenue, means the sales value of Synthetic Lubricants This report studies Synthetic Lubricants in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering ExxonMobil Shell BP Chevron Total Idemitsu Kosan BASF Fuchs Ashland Valvoline JX Group Lukoil Petronas Chemtura Amsoil Pertamina CNPC Sinopec Delian Group Original Chemical LOPAL GAOKE PETROCHEMICAL COPTON Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Synthetic Lubricants in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India Would like to place an order @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=723538 Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Polyalphaolefin (PAO) Polyalkylene Glycol (PAG) Di-basic Acid Ester (Di-Ester) Polyol-Ester Silicone Others Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Synthetic Lubricants in each application, can be divided into Petrochemical Industry Metal Stamping Others Global Synthetic Lubricants Market Research Report 2016 1 Synthetic Lubricants Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Synthetic Lubricants 1.2 Synthetic Lubricants Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Synthetic Lubricants by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Polyalphaolefin (PAO) 1.2.3 Polyalkylene Glycol (PAG) 1.2.4 Di-basic Acid Ester (Di-Ester) 1.2.5 Polyol-Ester 1.2.6 Silicone 1.2.7 Others 1.3 Synthetic Lubricants Segment by Application 1.3.1 Synthetic Lubricants Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Petrochemical Industry 1.3.3 Metal Stamping 1.3.4 Others 1.4 Synthetic Lubricants Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Synthetic Lubricants (2011-2021) 2 Global Synthetic Lubricants Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.2 Global Synthetic Lubricants Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.3 Global Synthetic Lubricants Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.4 Manufacturers Synthetic Lubricants Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type 2.5 Synthetic Lubricants Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Synthetic Lubricants Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Synthetic Lubricants Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers 2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2011-2016) 3.1 Global Synthetic Lubricants Capacity and Market Share by Region (2011-2016) 3.2 Global Synthetic Lubricants Production and Market Share by Region (2011-2016) 3.3 Global Synthetic Lubricants Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2011-2016) 3.4 Global Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.5 North America Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.6 Europe Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.7 China Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.8 Japan Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.9 Southeast Asia Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.10 India Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7 Global Synthetic Lubricants Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 ExxonMobil 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Type I 7.1.2.2 Type II 7.1.3 ExxonMobil Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Shell 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Type I 7.2.2.2 Type II 7.2.3 Shell Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 BP 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Type I 7.3.2.2 Type II 7.3.3 BP Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Chevron 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Type I 7.4.2.2 Type II 7.4.3 Chevron Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Total 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Type I 7.5.2.2 Type II 7.5.3 Total Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Idemitsu Kosan 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Type I 7.6.2.2 Type II 7.6.3 Idemitsu Kosan Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 BASF 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Type I 7.7.2.2 Type II 7.7.3 BASF Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 Fuchs 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Type I 7.8.2.2 Type II 7.8.3 Fuchs Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Ashland Valvoline 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Type I 7.9.2.2 Type II 7.9.3 Ashland Valvoline Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 JX Group 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Synthetic Lubricants Product Type, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Type I 7.10.2.2 Type II 7.10.3 JX Group Synthetic Lubricants Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 Lukoil 7.12 Petronas 7.13 Chemtura 7.14 Amsoil 7.15 Pertamina 7.16 CNPC 7.17 Sinopec 7.18 Delian Group 7.19 Original Chemical 7.20 LOPAL 7.21 GAOKE PETROCHEMICAL 7.22 COPTON


News Article | November 11, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes:  Sales, means the sales volume of Acetone Cyanohydrin  Revenue, means the sales value of Acetone Cyanohydrin This report studies sales (consumption) of Acetone Cyanohydrin in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering  Mitsubishi Rayon  Dow  Arkema  BASF  Evonik  Kuraray  Mitsubishi Gas Chemical  Formosa Plastics  Sumitomo Chemical  Asahi Kasei  Sinopec  Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Acetone Cyanohydrin in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  United States  China  Europe  Japan  Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Type I  Type II  Type III  Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Acetone Cyanohydrin in each application, can be divided into  Application 1  Application 2  Application 3 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales Market Report 2016  1 Acetone Cyanohydrin Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Acetone Cyanohydrin  1.2 Classification of Acetone Cyanohydrin  1.2.1 Type I  1.2.2 Type II  1.2.3 Type III  1.3 Application of Acetone Cyanohydrin  1.3.1 Application 1  1.3.2 Application 2  1.3.3 Application 3  1.4 Acetone Cyanohydrin Market by Regions  1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Acetone Cyanohydrin (2011-2021)  1.5.1 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  1.5.2 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application  2.1 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Market Competition by Manufacturers  2.1.1 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016)  2.1.2 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  2.2 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin (Volume and Value) by Type  2.2.1 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  2.2.2 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  2.3 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin (Volume and Value) by Regions Figure Picture of Acetone Cyanohydrin  Table Classification of Acetone Cyanohydrin  Figure Global Sales Market Share of Acetone Cyanohydrin by Type in 2015  Figure Type I Picture  Figure Type II Picture  Table Applications of Acetone Cyanohydrin  Figure Global Sales Market Share of Acetone Cyanohydrin by Application in 2015  Figure Application 1 Examples  Figure Application 2 Examples  Figure United States Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure China Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Europe Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Japan Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Figure Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  Table Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Figure 2015 Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales Share by Manufacturers  Figure 2016 Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales Share by Manufacturers  Table Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016)  Table 2015 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue Share by Manufacturers  Table 2016 Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue Share by Manufacturers  Table Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  Table Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales Share by Type (2011-2016)  Figure Sales Market Share of Acetone Cyanohydrin by Type (2011-2016)  Figure Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Sales Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016)  Table Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/736126-global-acetone-cyanohydrin-sales-market-report-2016


Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Coal Gasification -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database This report studies sales (consumption) of Coal Gasification in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Coal Gasification in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like United States China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Coal Gasification in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Coal Gasification Sales Market Report 2016 1 Coal Gasification Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Coal Gasification 1.2 Classification of Coal Gasification 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Coal Gasification 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Coal Gasification Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Coal Gasification (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Coal Gasification Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Coal Gasification Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 7 Global Coal Gasification Manufacturers Analysis 7.1 GE 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.1.2 Coal Gasification Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Type I 7.1.2.2 Type II 7.1.3 GE Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Shell 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.2.2 119 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Type I 7.2.2.2 Type II 7.2.3 Shell Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Siemens 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.3.2 134 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Type I 7.3.2.2 Type II 7.3.3 Siemens Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Lurgi (Air Liquide) 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.4.2 Nov Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Type I 7.4.2.2 Type II 7.4.3 Lurgi (Air Liquide) Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Synthesis Energy Systems (SES) 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Type I 7.5.2.2 Type II 7.5.3 Synthesis Energy Systems (SES) Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Advantica Group 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Type I 7.6.2.2 Type II 7.6.3 Advantica Group Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Sedin Engineering 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.7.2 Energy Product Type, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Type I 7.7.2.2 Type II 7.7.3 Sedin Engineering Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 CHOREN 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Type I 7.8.2.2 Type II 7.8.3 CHOREN Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Taiyuan Coal Gasification 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Type I 7.9.2.2 Type II 7.9.3 Taiyuan Coal Gasification Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 Yankuang Group 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 7.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Type I 7.10.2.2 Type II 7.10.3 Yankuang Group Coal Gasification Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 Liuzhou Chemical Industry 7.12 Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec Group) 7.13 Shanxi Lanhua Coal Industry Group 7.14 Yunan Yuntianhua 7.15 Heilongjiang Longmei Mining Holding Group 7.16 Henan Jinkai Investment Holding Group 7.17 LUXI Group 7.18 Ruixing 7.19 Henan Coal Industry Chemical Industry Group 7.20 Cheng Feng Petrochemical For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/735892-global-coal-gasification-sales-market-report-2016


This report studies Chemical Accelerators in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Akzonobel N.V BASF SE Lanxess AG Solvay SA Arkema SA China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec Corp.) Eastman Chemical Company R. T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc Emery Oleochemicals Llc Behn Meyer Group View Full Report With Complete TOC, List Of Figure and Table: http://globalqyresearch.com/global-chemical-accelerators-market-research-report-2016 Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Chemical Accelerators in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Chemical Accelerators in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Chemical Accelerators Market Research Report 2016 1 Chemical Accelerators Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Chemical Accelerators 1.2 Chemical Accelerators Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Chemical Accelerators by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Type I 1.2.3 Type II 1.2.4 Type III 1.3 Chemical Accelerators Segment by Application 1.3.1 Chemical Accelerators Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Application 1 1.3.3 Application 2 1.3.4 Application 3 1.4 Chemical Accelerators Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Chemical Accelerators (2011-2021) 7 Global Chemical Accelerators Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Akzonobel N.V 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Type I 7.1.2.2 Type II 7.1.3 Akzonobel N.V Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 BASF SE 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Type I 7.2.2.2 Type II 7.2.3 BASF SE Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Lanxess AG 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Type I 7.3.2.2 Type II 7.3.3 Lanxess AG Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Solvay SA 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Type I 7.4.2.2 Type II 7.4.3 Solvay SA Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Arkema SA 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Type I 7.5.2.2 Type II 7.5.3 Arkema SA Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec Corp.) 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Type I 7.6.2.2 Type II 7.6.3 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec Corp.) Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Eastman Chemical Company 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Type I 7.7.2.2 Type II 7.7.3 Eastman Chemical Company Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 R. T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Type I 7.8.2.2 Type II 7.8.3 R. T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Emery Oleochemicals Llc 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Type I 7.9.2.2 Type II 7.9.3 Emery Oleochemicals Llc Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 Behn Meyer Group 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Chemical Accelerators Product Type, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Type I 7.10.2.2 Type II 7.10.3 Behn Meyer Group Chemical Accelerators Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview Global QYResearch ( http://globalqyresearch.com/ ) is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.


Notes: Production, means the output of Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Revenue, means the sales value of Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) This report studies Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Akzo Nobel BASF Emerald Performance Chemicals Lanxess Corporation Vanderbilt Georgia Pacific Chemicals Merchem PMC Rubber Chemicals Eastman Chemical Arkema SA Sinopec Corp Behn Meyer Group Duslo Xiangyu Chem Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India Would like to place an order @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=719233 Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Antidegradants Accelerators Other Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Market Research Report 2016 1 Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) 1.2 Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Antidegradants 1.2.3 Accelerators 1.2.4 Other 1.3 Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Segment by Application 1.3.1 Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Application 1 1.3.3 Application 2 1.3.4 Application 3 1.4 Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) (2011-2021) 2 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.2 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.3 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.4 Manufacturers Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type 2.5 Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers 2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2011-2016) 3.1 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity and Market Share by Region (2011-2016) 3.2 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production and Market Share by Region (2011-2016) 3.3 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2011-2016) 3.4 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.5 North America Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.6 Europe Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.7 China Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.8 Japan Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.9 Southeast Asia Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 3.10 India Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 4 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 4.1 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Consumption by Regions (2011-2016) 4.2 North America Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 4.3 Europe Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 4.4 China Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 4.5 Japan Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 4.6 Southeast Asia Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 4.7 India Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 5 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type 5.1 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 5.2 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 5.3 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Price by Type (2011-2016) 5.4 Global Rubber Processing Chemicals (Additives) Production Growth by Type (2011-2016)


News Article | October 31, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

MarketStudyReport.com adds “Butadiene Global Market Briefing 2016” new report to its research database. The report spread across 35 pages with table and figures in it. The Butadiene industry produces butadiene which is an industrial chemical used in the manufacture of synthetic rubber. Butadiene is produced as a byproduct in the steam cracking process used to produce ethylene and other olefins. It is used in the production of derivatives such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), acrylonitrile butadiene (NBR) and styrene-butadiene (SBR). Butadiene is also used in the synthesis of cycloalkanes and cycloalkenes. The Butadiene Global Market Briefing provides strategists, marketers and senior management with the critical information they need to assess the butadiene sector. Description The Butadiene Global Market Briefing Report from the Business Research Company covers market characteristics, size and growth, segmentation, regional breakdowns, competitive landscape, market shares, trends and strategies for this market. The market characteristics section of the report defines and explains the market. The market size section gives the butadiene market revenues, covering both the historic growth of the market and forecasting the future. Drivers and restraints looks at the external factors supporting and controlling the growth of the market. Market segmentations break down the key sub sectors which make up the market. The regional breakdowns section gives the size of the market geographically. Competitive landscape gives a description of the competitive nature of the market, market shares, and a description of the leading companies. Key financial deals which have shaped the market in the last three years are identified. The trends and strategies section highlights the likely future developments in the butadiene market and suggests approaches. Browse full table of contents and data tables at https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/butadiene-global-market-briefing-2016/ Reasons to Purchase - Get up to date information available on the butadiene market globally. - Identify growth segments and opportunities. - Facilitate decision making on the basis of historic and forecast data and understand the drivers and restraints on the market. - Develop strategies based on likely future developments. - Gain a global perspective on the development of the market. - Report will be updated with the latest data and delivered to you within 3-5 working days of order. Scope Markets Covered: Butadiene Companies Mentioned: BASF S.E., Braskem S.A., Dow chemical company, ENI S.p.A, Exxon Mobil Chemical Company , Ineos Group AG, LyondellBasell Industries N.V., Nizhnekamskneftekhim O.A.O. , Royal Dutch Shell Plc., Sinopec and others. Geographic scope: Americas, Europe, Asia, Middle East and Africa, Oceania. Time series: Five years historic and forecast. Data: Market value in $ billions. Data segmentations: Regional breakdowns, market share of competitors, key sub segments. Sourcing and Referencing: Data and analysis throughout the report is sourced using end notes. The Butadiene industry produces butadiene which is an industrial chemical used in the manufacture of synthetic rubber. Butadiene is produced as a byproduct in the steam cracking process used to produce ethylene and other olefins. It is used in the production of derivatives such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), acrylonitrile butadiene (NBR) and styrene-butadiene (SBR). Butadiene is also used in the synthesis of cycloalkanes and cycloalkenes. The Butadiene Global Market Briefing provides strategists, marketers and senior management with the critical information they need to assess the butadiene sector. The Americas was the x largest geographic region in the specialty doctors market in 2015, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. Asia was the x largest geographic market, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. Europe was the x largest geographic market, accounting for $x billion or x% of the global market. The Middle East and Africa accounted for x% and $x billion, while Oceania accounted for x% of the global specialty doctors market. To receive personalized assistance write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150


News Article | November 23, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes: Sales, means the sales volume of Bio Based Lubricant Revenue, means the sales value of Bio Based Lubricant This report studies sales (consumption) of Bio Based Lubricant in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering BASF SE BP Plc Balmer Lawrie Chevron Lubricants Dow Corning Corporation Elba Lubrication Inc. Eurol B.V. Exol Corporation ExxonMobil Corporation FUCHS LUBRITECH GmbH HUSK-ITT Corporation Klüber Lubrication München SE & Co. KG Matrix Specialty Lubricants BV Nyco S.A. Royal Dutch Shell PLC Sinopec Corporation TeccemGmbh Total S.A Tribology Tech-Lube Anderol Specialty Lubricants Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Bio Based Lubricant in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like United States China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Bio Based Lubricant in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales Market Report 2016 1 Bio Based Lubricant Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Bio Based Lubricant 1.2 Classification of Bio Based Lubricant 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Bio Based Lubricant 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Bio Based Lubricant Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Bio Based Lubricant (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Bio Based Lubricant Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application 2.1 Global Bio Based Lubricant Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1.1 Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.1.2 Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.2 Global Bio Based Lubricant (Volume and Value) by Type 2.2.1 Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.2.2 Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.3 Global Bio Based Lubricant (Volume and Value) by Regions 2.3.1 Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.3.2 Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.4 Global Bio Based Lubricant (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of Bio Based Lubricant Table Classification of Bio Based Lubricant Figure Global Sales Market Share of Bio Based Lubricant by Type in 2015 Figure Type I Picture Figure Type II Picture Table Applications of Bio Based Lubricant Figure Global Sales Market Share of Bio Based Lubricant by Application in 2015 Figure Application 1 Examples Figure Application 2 Examples Figure United States Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure China Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Europe Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Japan Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Figure 2015 Bio Based Lubricant Sales Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Bio Based Lubricant Sales Share by Manufacturers Table Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table 2015 Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2016 Global Bio Based Lubricant Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Bio Based Lubricant Sales Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Bio Based Lubricant by Type (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US@   Bio Based Lubricant Sales Global Market Research Report 2016


News Article | November 22, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

MarketStudyReport.com adds “Styrenic Block Copolymer (SBC) Market Size By Product (Styrene-butadiene-styrene, Styrene-isoprene-styrene, Hydrogenated SBC), By Application (Paving & Roofing, Footwear, Advanced Materials, Adhesives, Sealants, Coatings), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook (U.S., Germany, UK, France, Italy, China, India, Japan, Brazil), Application Potential, Price Trend, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2016-2023” new report to its research database. The report spread across 105 pages with table and figures in it. Styrenic Block Copolymer(SBC) Market size was more than $1.96 million tons for 2015 and is predicted to register CAGR of more than 4.52% by end of forecast timeframe. Baby diapers industry size is predicted to cross $64.2 billion by end of 2023 from $39 billion for 2014, with projected profit at 6% by end of forecast timeframe. Rising baby healthcare issues along with rise in purchasing capacity are key aspects driving industry growth. These are primarily utilized to produce tabs, waistbands, leg elastics ,side panels and landing zone in diapers. Enhanced comfort and best fit size of diaper due to elastomeric substances led producers to accept compounds like SEPS, SBS, SEBS, SEEPS and SIS which promoted demand for the product. Styrenic block copolymer (SBC)compounds contribute about 40% to 80% by mass of total baby diapers. Latin America and APAC Styrenic block copolymer (SBC) market share can grow substantially in terms of baby diaper use. Rise in population along with increase in disposable incomes is predicted to influence the regional industry growth. Approvals from U.S. Pharmacopoeia and FDA(Food & Drug Administration of U.S.) to make use of the compound in medical sector due to less dependence on PVC(Polyvinyl chloride) is predicted to fuel Styrenic block copolymer demand. High resistance, transparency, design versatility, exceptional thermal stability, easy sterilization by gamma irradiation and mutagenic potential are main features promoting industry growth. Key raw substances, natural gas and crude oil are involved in production of SBC(Styrenic block copolymer). Varying raw material costs due to political instability can adversely impact industry trend. Product Trends SBS product segment dominated the industry in terms of size and produced greater than $4.51 billion revenue for 2015. Rapid baby diaper segment growth and fast expansion of footwear section due to rising customer affordability are predicted to influence the demand of product. Hydrogenated product segment is predicted to acquire greater than 5.6% of growth in terms of size by end of 2023. Growing trend to obtain sustainable sealants & adhesives in construction sector is predicted to nurture the growth of the segment. Application Trends The industry is segmented into various applications like footwear application and roofing & paving application. Footwear application segment is predicted to register greater than 4% of CAGR by end of 2023. High resilience strength and material sustainability are few of the properties promoting the demand for this segment. Shift in purchasing trend and tendency to adapt footwear for different reasons is another key aspect driving the product demand. Roofing & paving application segment was evaluated at more than $1.96 billion for 2015. Construction sector growth along with increasing customer choice for personalized home interiors are key driving aspects favorably influencing the segment. Styrenic Block Copolymer (SBC) Market Size Regional Trends APAC dominated Styrenic block copolymer market and was evaluated at more than $2.66 billion for 2015. China contributed maximum regional industry share during the year. Fast industrialization along with growth of production sector due to easy availability of skilled labor are main factors driving demand for compound. China is one of the key footwear producing nations succeeded by India. Growing SBC use in footwear is predicted to favorably affect industry growth in the region. U.S. led the North American industry in terms of size. It is predicted to register more than 4.23% CAGR during forecast timeline. Approval given by FDA to use SBC in production of medical devices is key driving aspect stimulating product demand. Large scale investment in building & construction segment in UAE and Saudi Arabia is predicted to boost the MEA(Middle East & Africa)Styrenic block copolymer market expansion. MEA is predicted to register greater than 4.81% CAGR during forecast timeframe. Competitive Trends Key industry players profiled in the report include Kraton Performance Polymers, En Chuan, Zeon Corporation, Asahi Kasei, Styrolution, Dynasol Elastomers, LCY Chemical Corporation,, LG Chemicals, Chi Mei Corporation, BASF, Versalis, TSRC, Momentive Specialty Chemicals, Chevron Phillips, JSR Corporation, Sinopec and Kumho Petrochemicals. To receive personalized assistance, write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150


News Article | December 1, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

This report studies ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering  Shell  BP  Caltex  ExxonMobil  Total  Sinopec  CNPC  Marathon Petroleum Company  FPCC  KNPC Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  North America  Europe  China  Japan  Southeast Asia  India  Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Type I  Type II  Type III  Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) in each application, can be divided into  Application 1  Application 2  Application 3 1 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Market Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol)  1.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Segment by Type  1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) by Type in 2015  1.2.2 Type I  1.2.3 Type II  1.2.4 Type III  1.3 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Segment by Application  1.3.1 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015  1.3.2 Application 1  1.3.3 Application 2  1.3.4 Application 3  1.4 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Market by Region  1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) (2011-2021) 2 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Market Competition by Manufacturers  2.1 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.2 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.3 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.4 Manufacturers ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type  2.5 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Market Competitive Situation and Trends  2.5.1 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Market Concentration Rate  2.5.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers  2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2011-2016)  3.1 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production by Region (2011-2016)  3.2 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production Market Share by Region (2011-2016)  3.3 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2011-2016)  3.4 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.5 North America ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.6 Europe ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.7 China ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.8 Japan ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.9 Southeast Asia ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.10 India ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 4 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.1 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Consumption by Regions (2011-2016)  4.2 North America ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.3 Europe ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.4 China ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.5 Japan ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.6 Southeast Asia ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.7 India ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 5 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type  5.1 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  5.2 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  5.3 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Price by Type (2011-2016)  5.4 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production Growth by Type (2011-2016) 6 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Market Analysis by Application  6.1 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Consumption and Market Share by Application (2011-2016)  6.2 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2011-2016)  6.3 Market Drivers and Opportunities  6.3.1 Potential Applications  6.3.2 Emerging Markets/Countries 7 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis  7.1 Shell  7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.1.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.1.2.1 Type I  7.1.2.2 Type II  7.1.3 Shell ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.2 BP  7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.2.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.2.2.1 Type I  7.2.2.2 Type II  7.2.3 BP ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.3 Caltex  7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.3.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.3.2.1 Type I  7.3.2.2 Type II  7.3.3 Caltex ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.4 ExxonMobil  7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.4.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.4.2.1 Type I  7.4.2.2 Type II  7.4.3 ExxonMobil ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.5 Total  7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.5.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.5.2.1 Type I  7.5.2.2 Type II  7.5.3 Total ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.6 Sinopec  7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.6.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.6.2.1 Type I  7.6.2.2 Type II  7.6.3 Sinopec ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.7 CNPC  7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.7.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.7.2.1 Type I  7.7.2.2 Type II  7.7.3 CNPC ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.8 Marathon Petroleum Company  7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.8.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.8.2.1 Type I  7.8.2.2 Type II  7.8.3 Marathon Petroleum Company ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.9 FPCC  7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.9.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.9.2.1 Type I  7.9.2.2 Type II  7.9.3 FPCC ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.10 KNPC  7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.10.2 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.10.2.1 Type I  7.10.2.2 Type II  7.10.3 KNPC ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 8 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Manufacturing Cost Analysis  8.1 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Key Raw Materials Analysis  8.1.1 Key Raw Materials  8.1.2 Price Trend of Key Raw Materials  8.1.3 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials  8.1.4 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials  8.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure  8.2.1 Raw Materials  8.2.2 Labor Cost  8.2.3 Manufacturing Expenses  8.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) 9 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers  9.1 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Industrial Chain Analysis  9.2 Upstream Raw Materials Sourcing  9.3 Raw Materials Sources of ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Major Manufacturers in 2015  9.4 Downstream Buyers 12 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Market Forecast (2016-2021)  12.1 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Revenue Forecast (2016-2021)  12.2 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production, Consumption Forecast by Regions (2016-2021)  12.3 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Production Forecast by Type (2016-2021)  12.4 Global ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Consumption Forecast by Application (2016-2021)  12.5 ULP(Un-Leaded Petrol) Price Forecast (2016-2021)


News Article | November 4, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Production, means the output of Aniline  Revenue, means the sales value of Aniline This report studies Aniline in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, with production, revenue, consumption, import and export in these regions, from 2011 to 2015, and forecast to 2021. This report focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering  BASF  Bayer  Huntsman  Sumitomo Chemical  Volzhsky Orgsynthese  Tosoh  GNFC  Sinopec Nanjing Chemical  Connell Chemical  SP Chemicals  Tianji  Lanzhou Chemical  Shandong Jinling  Shandong Haihua  Wanhua Chemical By types, the market can be split into  Type I  Type II  Type III By Application, the market can be split into  Dye  Pesticide  Rubber chemicals  Other By Regions, this report covers (we can add the regions/countries as you want)  North America  China  Europe  Southeast Asia  Japan  India Global Aniline Market Professional Survey Report 2016    1 Industry Overview of Aniline       1.1 Definition and Specifications of Aniline          1.1.1 Definition of Aniline          1.2 Specifications of Aniline       1.2 Classification of Aniline          1.2.1 Type I          1.2.2 Type II          1.2.3 Type III       1.3 Applications of Aniline          1.3.1 Dye          1.3.2 Pesticide          1.3.3 Rubber chemicals          1.3.4 Other      1.4 Market Segment by Regions         1.4.1 North America         1.4.2 China         1.4.3 Europe         1.4.4 Southeast Asia         1.4.5 Japan         1.4.6 India Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports understand how essential statistical surveying information is for your organization or association. Therefore, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available.


News Article | November 4, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

This report studies Aniline in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, with production, revenue, consumption, import and export in these regions, from 2011 to 2015, and forecast to 2021. This report focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering  BASF  Bayer  Huntsman  Sumitomo Chemical  Volzhsky Orgsynthese  Tosoh  GNFC  Sinopec Nanjing Chemical  Connell Chemical  SP Chemicals  Tianji  Lanzhou Chemical  Shandong Jinling  Shandong Haihua  Wanhua Chemical By types, the market can be split into  Type I  Type II  Type III By Application, the market can be split into  Dye  Pesticide  Rubber chemicals  Other By Regions, this report covers (we can add the regions/countries as you want)  North America  China  Europe  Southeast Asia  Japan  India Notes:  Production, means the output of Aniline  Revenue, means the sales value of Aniline Global Aniline Market Professional Survey Report 2016  1 Industry Overview of Aniline  1.1 Definition and Specifications of Aniline  1.1.1 Definition of Aniline  1.1.2 Specifications of Aniline  1.2 Classification of Aniline  1.2.1 Type I  1.2.2 Type II  1.2.3 Type III  1.3 Applications of Aniline  1.3.1 Dye  1.3.2 Pesticide  1.3.3 Rubber chemicals  1.3.4 Other  1.4 Market Segment by Regions  1.4.1 North America  1.4.2 China  1.4.3 Europe  1.4.4 Southeast Asia  1.4.5 Japan  1.4.6 India For more information or any query mail at [email protected] Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports understand how essential statistical surveying information is for your organization or association. Therefore, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available.


News Article | November 3, 2016
Site: www.prnewswire.co.uk

The global barrier resins market 2016 to 2026 research says increase in the disposable incomes of the middle-class population in Asia-Pacific, and demand from end-use industries are expected to fuel the demand, thus driving the barrier resins market in the region. Complete report on barrier resins market spread across 211 pages, analyzing 13 major companies and providing 143 data tables as well as 63 figures is now available at http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/barrier-resins-market-by-type-pvdc-evoh-pen-application-food-beverage-pharmaceutical-medical-cosmetics-agriculture-industrial-and-region-asia-pacific-north-america-europe-south-america-middle-ea-st-to-2026-market-report.html. The global barrier resins market is estimated to reach USD 3.52 billion by 2026, at a CAGR of 5.85% from 2016 to 2026. Growth in the pharmaceutical packaging industry in emerging economies, enhanced shelf life of packaged food products, and growing urbanization and changing lifestyles are driving the food packaging market, which in turn is expected to drive the barrier resins market during the next ten years.  The major restraining factors in the global barrier resins market are the increasing overall packaging costs, and stringent health regulatory compliance standards, environmental, and political norms. Polyvinylidene Chloride (PVDC) is a highly effective polymer that is produced by the polymerisation of a vinylidene chloride (VDC) monomer with other monomers such as acrylic esters and unsaturated carboxyl groups. It is the chemistry, density and symmetry of the molecules in PVDC that gives the material its excellent barrier properties against fat, vapor, and gases. The barrier resins market report covers two different segmentations which include, market by type (PVDC, EVOH, PEN, and others), and by application (food & beverage, pharmaceutical & medical, cosmetics, agriculture, and industrial, and others) and market by five different regions along with the countries. The application segment is further analyzed for each country in the respective region. The key companies profiled in this report are Asahi Kasei Corporation (Japan), Chang Chun Petrochemical Co., Ltd. (Taiwan), E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (U.S.), INVISTA (U.S.), Kuraray Co., Ltd (Japan), Kureha Corporation (Japan), Solvay S. A. (Belgium), Teijin Limited (Japan), The Dow Chemical Company (U.S.), The Nippon Synthetic Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Japan), Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd. (China), Honeywell International, Inc. (U.S.), and Ineos Group Limited (Switzerland). Order a copy of Barrier Resins Market by Type (PVDC, EVOH, PEN), Application (Food & Beverage, Pharmaceutical & Medical, Cosmetics, Agriculture, Industrial), and Region (Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, South America, Middle East & Africa) - Global Forecast to 2026 research report at http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/contacts/purchase?rname=738429. On a related note, another research on Epoxy Resin Market by Physical Form and End-Use Industry with Global Forecast to 2021 says epoxy resin market is projected to reach USD 8.77 billion by 2021, registering a CAGR of 5.77% between 2016 and 2021. The market is witnessing a moderate growth rate owing to increasing applications, technological advancements, and growing demand in Asia-Pacific. The epoxy resin market in the composites application segment is projected to witness the highest growth in. Economic expansion in the developing countries of Asia-Pacific will raise demand for composites insulation in both building construction and automotive industries. It is followed by North America and Western Europe. China, the U.S., and Germany are the largest producers of epoxy resins in these regions. The building & construction is the largest consumer of epoxy resins materials in Asia-Pacific. China and Japan have the largest share in the Asia-Pacific epoxy resin market. Companies profiled include Olin Corporation (U.S.), Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Taiwan), Huntsman Corporation (U.S.), Hexion Inc. (U.S.), Kukdo Chemical Co. Ltd. (South Korea), Chang Chung Plastics Co. Ltd. (Taiwan), Aditya Birla Chemicals (Thailand), The 3M Company (U.S.), BASF SE (Germany) and Sinopec Corporation (China). Read more at http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/global-epoxy-resin-market-by-application-geography-forecasts-up-to-2017-market-report.html. Explore more reports on resins market at http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/reports/materials-chemicals/plastics/resins. RnRMarketResearch.com is your single source for all market research needs. Our database includes 100,000+ market research reports from over 95 leading global publishers & in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets. With comprehensive information about the publishers and the industries for which they publish market research reports, we help you in your purchase decision by mapping your information needs with our huge collection of reports. We provide 24/7 online and offline support to our customers.


Global Industrial Solvents Market (Hydrocarbons, Acids, Esters, Glycols, Aromatics, Alcohols, Ketones, Ethers and Other Products) for Dissolution Agent, Cleaning and Degreasing, Paints and Coatings, Applications in Printing Products and Cleaning, Cosmetics, Printing Ink, Adhesives and Other Applications: Global Industry Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis and Forecast, 2015 – 2021 The industrial solvents market report includes comprehensive and profound analysis on the global and regional level. The report gives historic data of 2015 along with a forecast from 2016 to 2021 based on revenue (USD Billion). The study comprises drivers, restraints and opportunities for the industrial solvents market along with the impact on the demand over the forecast period. The report provides a complete view on the industrial solvents market and encompasses detailed product portfolio and strategic developments of key vendors. To know the competitive landscape of the industrial solvents market, an analysis of Porter’s five forces model is done. The study cover market attractiveness analysis, in which product and application segments are scaled based on the market size, growth rate, and attractiveness. The report provides a crucial view on the industrial solvents market by segmenting the market based on products, applications, and region. Based on the product the industrial market is segmented as hydrocarbons, acids, esters, glycols, aromatics, alcohols, ketones, ethers and other products. Various applications for the industrial solvents market are dissolution agent, cleaning, and degreasing, paints and coatings, applications in printing products and cleaning and others. All the segments have been analyzed based on existing and future trends and the market is projected from 2015 to 2021. The regional segmentation includes the present and forecast demand for North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America and the Middle East and Africa with its further bifurcation into major countries including U.S. Germany, France, UK, China, Japan, India, and Brazil. The report present comprehensive competitive outlook with company profiles of the key players operating in the global market. Key participants profiled in the report include BASF SE, Daicel Chemical Industries, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Lyondell Basell Industries N.V., Eni S.p.A., Arkema S.A., Nippon Refine Co., Ltd., Royal Dutch Shell PLC, The Dow Chemical Company, SK Innovation Co., Ltd., Petroleo Brasileiro S.A., Sinopec Corp., JX Holdings, Inc. and BP PLC among others. This report segments the industrial solvents market as follows:


News Article | November 3, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Zion Research has published a new report titled “Industrial Solvents Market (Hydrocarbons, Acids, Esters, Glycols, Aromatics, Alcohols, Ketones, Ethers and Other Products) for Dissolution Agent, Cleaning and Degreasing, Paints and Coatings, Applications in Printing Products and Cleaning, Cosmetics, Printing Ink, Adhesives and Other Applications: Global Industry Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis and Forecast, 2015 – 2021” According to the report, global demand for industrial solvents market was valued at over USD 26.50 billion in 2015, is expected to reach above USD 31.60 billion in 2021 and is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of slightly above 3.0% between 2016 and 2021. Solvents are defined as any substance that dissolves with the solute to form a solution. Solvents can be in the form of solid, liquid or gas possessing the dissolving property. Solvents can be classified as polar or nonpolar depending on its charge. Industrial solvents are used in processing and formulation of products. Solvents are used in diverse applications in commercial, domestic or research purpose. Industrial solvents are mainly used in degreasing, cleaning, thinning oil-based paints and paint stripping. However, prolong exposure to some of the industrial solvents can lead to adverse health effects. Increasing demand from the paint and printing industries mainly drives the industrial solvents market. Moreover, growing urbanization and rapidly expanding industrialization contributes to the growth of industrial solvents market. Yet, strict regulations led by the government for the use of solvents due to its impact on the environment may impede the growth of this market. Nonetheless, growing demand of infrastructure from the emerging economics is expected to experience lucrative opportunity in the near future. Know more before buying this report @  https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/inquiry/industrial-solvents-market Based on products the industrial solvents can be segmented as hydrocarbons, acids, esters, glycols, aromatics, alcohols, ketones, ethers and other products. Hydrocarbon solvents emerged as the potential segment owing to its organic properties and also the regulatory pressure for use of organic solvents for several applications may trigger its demand in the market. Various application segments for industrial solvents include dissolution agent, cleaning, and degreasing, paints and coatings, applications in printing products and cleaning and others. Dissolution agents accounted for 48% of the total industrial solvent market due to its various uses in the industry. There has been immense growth in the infrastructure sector owing to rapid urbanization. The increasing use of paints in infrastructure is driving the market for paints and coatings which in turn expected to augment the demand for industrial solvents. The cleaning and degreasing held 24% of the total market share owing to increasing demand from the printing industry in 2015. The industrial solvent market is matured in North America and Europe and hence it is anticipated to experience stable growth in the coming years. Asia Pacific and Latin America are expected to grow at the fastest pace due to rapid industrialization and increasing demand from the pharmaceuticals and other industries. The Middle East and Africa is projected to have a decent growth in the forecast period due to abundant availability of raw resources. Some of the key players in the industrial solvents include BASF SE, Daicel Chemical Industries, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Lyondell Basell Industries N.V., Eni S.p.A., Arkema S.A., Nippon Refine Co., Ltd., Royal Dutch Shell PLC, The Dow Chemical Company, SK Innovation Co., Ltd., Petroleo Brasileiro S.A., Sinopec Corp., JX Holdings, Inc. and BP PLC among others. This report segments the industrial solvents market as follows:


News Article | November 4, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

This report studies Acetone Cyanohydrin in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering  Mitsubishi Rayon  Dow  Arkema  BASF  Evonik  Kuraray  Mitsubishi Gas Chemical  Formosa Plastics  Sumitomo Chemical  Asahi Kasei  Sinopec Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Acetone Cyanohydrin in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  North America  Europe  China  Japan  Southeast Asia  India  Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Type I  Type II  Type III Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Acetone Cyanohydrin in each application, can be divided into  Application 1  Application 2  Application 3 Notes:  Production, means the output of Acetone Cyanohydrin  Revenue, means the sales value of Acetone Cyanohydrin Global Acetone Cyanohydrin Market Research Report 2016  1 Acetone Cyanohydrin Market Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Acetone Cyanohydrin  1.2 Acetone Cyanohydrin Segment by Type  1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Acetone Cyanohydrin by Type in 2015  1.2.2 Type I  1.2.3 Type II  1.2.4 Type III  1.3 Acetone Cyanohydrin Segment by Application  1.3.1 Acetone Cyanohydrin Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015  1.3.2 Application 1  1.3.3 Application 2  1.3.4 Application 3  1.4 Acetone Cyanohydrin Market by Region  1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Acetone Cyanohydrin (2011-2021 For more information or any query mail at [email protected] Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports understand how essential statistical surveying information is for your organization or association. Therefore, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available.


News Article | September 26, 2016
Site: www.theenergycollective.com

Chinese state-owned enterprises, China’s national oil companies foremost among them, have incurred phenomenal debts – higher than the country’s total GDP. So far they have been bailed out by the government, but this just shifts the problem one level up,  to China Inc as a whole, writes geophysicist  (ex-Shell) Jilles van den Beukel. Van den Beukel explains how China’s national oil companies Sinopec, CNPC and CNOOC got into this fix and why the world should hold its breath about their future. Some 15 years ago I worked for a small and well-hidden part of Shell in Central Africa. I have fond memories of living on the shores of Lake Yenzi in Gabon where my children grew up in a world of lagoons and tropical rainforest virtually untouched by mankind. To this day I miss the human warmth of Africa. Towards the end of my spell in Gabon we would discuss among colleagues the arrival of a new competitor in country: Sinopec. We were puzzled. How could we reconcile the stories that the Chinese were  taking over Africa (if not the world) with this hapless new venture, which had trouble getting to grips (both geology and country wise) with a completely new environment? What were we missing? I do not think we underestimated them; it was expected they would work hard and learn fast (and they had money to spend). But the general view was that they faced an uphill struggle. These days the Chinese national oil companies (NOCs) have long shifted their focus from leftover assets in Africa to other parts of the world, including North America. The growth in their overseas oil production has been phenomenal. But it has come at a price. Earlier this year Moody’s estimated that the debt of Chinese state owned enterprises (SOEs), of which the NOCs form a major part, had risen to about 115% of China’s GDP, higher than for any other country in the world. There are a number of questions that I want to address in this paper. Where did the Chinese NOCs invest? Did they overpay? What were their objectives to go abroad and were they met? And perhaps most importantly: have the Chinese NOCs now become global energy powerhouses or are they giants with feet of clay? A heartland of mature onshore fields.  Unlike some of its neighbors (e.g., Japan or S. Korea) China has a large domestic oil production. The major fields were found in the 1950’s and 1960’s. The largest field, Daqing, has produced over 10 billion barrels and is still producing close to 700,000 barrels per day. In spite of frantic efforts, later exploration has enjoyed much more limited success. In 1993 consumption overtook domestic production and since then consumption has increased fourfold (whereas domestic production has only seen limited growth). The large dependence on oil imports (currently China imports about 62% of its oil) is a key issue for China’s energy security. Today, China is still the fourth or fifth largest oil producer in the world with Canada (after Saudi Arabia, Russia and the US). But the bulk of its production comes from very mature fields such as Daqing, which by now experience high water cuts. It is only by intense (and costly) enhanced oil recovery methods that decline can be limited. As a result China’s onshore production is not low cost, of the order of 30 dollars per barrel on average (with a marginal cost that is much higher). Western publicity of Chinese oil companies tends to focus on their overseas acquisitions but the heartlands of these companies are mature conventional fields and their core technical expertise is maximizing recovery from these fields. Chinese NOCs operate in a different way compared to the western majors. Their preference is to do as much as possible in house (including the use of in house service companies). If this is not possible they tend to use Chinese service companies and only as a last resort (if specialized knowledge is not available in house or in China) western service companies. Activities such as logistics and catering are done in house. Their workforces are much larger than those of western firms with similar production (e.g., CNPC employs about 550,000 people). Government owned, not government run.  Initially oil production, processing and distribution were controlled by the Ministry of Petroleum Industry (the forerunner of CNPC) and the Ministry of Chemical Industry (the forerunner of Sinopec). In the 1980’s these ministries were converted into state owned enterprises (SOEs) and they both became integrated oil companies (be it that CNPC still has a bigger focus on the upstream and Sinopec has a bigger focus on the downstream). A third major SOE was added (CNOOC, China National Offshore Oil Company) and to date these companies (generally referred to in China as “the big three”) dominate China’s oil industry. Each of them comprises a wholly state-owned holding company and a listed subsidiary for which domestic and overseas shareholders own a minority stake (e.g., PetroChina in the case of CNPC). To date, the heads of CNPC and Sinopec are of ministerial rank in China’s hierarchy (a higher rank than the much smaller government agencies that oversee them). To date there is no formal Ministry of Energy in China. The result has been described as “ineffective institutions and powerful firms”. The NOCs are owned by the state but not run by the state. According to an IEA report, “the top executives of the NOCs are deeply connected to the top leadership of the government and the CCP (Chinese Communist Party); they must wear two hats, as leaders of major commercial enterprises and as top Party operatives. It is in the interests of both the government and the Party that the NOCs are commercially successful, and that they secure adequate oil and gas supplies. Leaders have a great deal of freedom in how they achieve these aims, and those who fulfill them have leverage in bargaining for future promotions.” An extensive overview of the structure of the Chinese oil industry can be found in a recent OIES report. Whilst NOCs will never omit a reference to China’s national energy security it seems that their own commercial interests are as strong a driver (if not the dominant one). There is no well coordinated master plan for China’s energy policy and overseas investments. Instead there are vague overall guidelines in an opaque environment. The limited oversight and the opaque way in which overseas assets are acquired or work is contracted out create an environment where widespread corruption is possible. The early 1990’s saw a number of developments that were of key importance to the Chinese oil industry and enabled them to go abroad. At the 1992 14th congress the CCP announced it would institute a “socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics”. Deng Xiaoping, retired from his official functions and yet at the height of his influence, believed the economic benefits of capitalism could be combined with the CCP guidance of a centralized and technically knowledgeable political system. Part of this economic reform policy involved the concept of “going out” (zou chuqu), investing surplus Chinese capital abroad to gain access to foreign markets, natural resources and advanced technology. In 1993-1994 the Chinese government relaxed domestic oil prices, improving the financial situation of the NOCs and enabling them to invest abroad. For the oil industry going out arrived at an opportune moment. In the early 1990s it had become clear that domestic production could no longer keep up with consumption. The absence of exploration success and the increasing maturity of China’s producing fields implied that better opportunities for investment existed abroad. The go-ahead to go abroad presented a huge opportunity to Chinese companies but also – given their complete lack of experience in operating or investing outside China – a huge challenge. But their long term aim was clear: to become competitive global businesses and to emulate the western IOCs. Initially they started out as operators in a limited number of countries (e.g., Sudan and Kazakhstan) with a relatively high political risk. At this time Chinese NOCs still lacked the financial muscle that they enjoyed later on and they had little choice but to go for these risky areas. The largest of these ventures was CNPC’s development of the Southern Sudan oil fields. It is also the one that has received by far the most attention in the western media. It has become the defining story for China’s investments in Africa, generating considerable reputational damage. Luke Patey’s “The new kings of crude” gives a well documented and balanced overview of CNPC’s Sudan venture (see the box for a more detailed account based on this book). It also paints a fascinating story of the pain of Chevron’s geologists (after years of hard work and exploration success having to leave the country for political reasons), the substantial achievements in development of the Chinese (establishing oil production and export in record time) and the difficult choices that the Chinese subsequently faced (with Sudanese leaders interested in power rather than their people’s well-being). Throughout the late 1970’s and early 1980’s Chevron ran a major exploration campaign in Southern Sudan. It was Chevron that found the Heglig field and started the work on an export pipeline. Then things started to fall apart. An attack by Southern Sudanese rebels on Chevron’s base camp (with three fatalities) was followed by a worsening of the political environment, forcing Chevron to put things on hold. By the late 1980’s the National Islamic Front came to power and the new central government threatened Chevron to resume operations or face expulsion. A new Chevron board turned out to be less committed to the project. Making a major additional investment in a country torn by civil war was just too risky for them (also given the low oil prices after the 1986 crash). They sold their assets to a local company for a mere pittance and walked away from a 1 billion dollar investment.  During the following years domestic and small western companies found themselves unable to make significant progress (to the frustration of the Sudanese government), lacking the financial and technical clout to develop a major new oil province at a large distance from shore.  By 1995 the Sudanese search for an operator able to unlock these major finds linked up with the Chinese search for overseas opportunities. It is easy to see why CNPC was interested: significant oil had been found and although field development required a large effort it was the kind of work (development wells, pipelines) that was well within their capabilities. Chinese banks were willing to finance with loans of (up to that moment) unprecedented magnitude. With the limited choices CNPC had it was an opportunity too good to walk away from.  Managing to get oil flowing from the Southern Sudan oil fields through a 1500 km pipeline to the Red Sea by 1999 was a major achievement for CNPC. In the preceding four years they threw everything at it that they had, sending out their best teams to their most important overseas venture. They built up an entire oil infrastructure, including a local refinery. The continuing political unrest and occasional hostage taking (or worse: killing) did not deter CNPC. In any case the grueling circumstances and low safety standards were a greater danger to Chinese workers than the Southern Sudanese rebels.  During the following years Sudan’s oil production soared (to a peak of 470,000 bpd in 2007) and the CNPC Sudan venture was by far the largest producer and profit maker of the Chinese NOCs’ overseas ventures.  But after 2005 things gradually started to become more difficult. The number of incidents started to rise and the fallout of the reputational damage of the Sudan venture started to become more clear. Sudan was becoming a major hindrance in the Chinese NOCs’ overseas investments and attempts to get access to western technology. Following the large initial investments the venture gradually went into cash cow mode. Investments in enhanced recovery, needed to crank up the recovery factors, were postponed. As a result recovery factors of these fields have remained low (e.g. 23% for Heglig, which is considerably lower than the 30 – 50% that has been achieved for similar high net to gross sandstone reservoirs in other parts of the world). The rapid severe water cut that these fields experienced in the 2005-2010 period suggest they have been producing too fast, maximizing profit in an unstable country that was now about to split up.  For CNPC Sudan was initially a major success story. The subsequent collapse of production after Southern Sudan’s secession in 2011 has been a major disappointment, however. To this day, Sudan and Southern Sudan are arguing about pipeline fees for the transport of Southern Sudan oil through the Sudanese pipeline. The Chinese are doing their best to keep both parties happy and remain unsuccessful in doing so (in the words of a Southern Sudan oil minister: “but Jesus said one cannot serve two masters”). Political risks (both within Sudan and the reputational damage in the western world) had been severely underestimated. Eventually, the overseas investments of the NOCs took off in earnest in 2009. The figure below (from a presentation by SIA Energy) gives an overview of Chinese NOCs acquisitions in the 2005 – 2013 period. A total of $123.5 bn was spent by the three Chinese NOCs during this period, primarily between 2009 and 2013. Apart from being of a much larger magnitude the nature of Chinese NOCs’ overseas investments in the 2009–2013 period is markedly different from the early investments in countries like Sudan, Kazakhstan and Venezuela. There is a shift from operated assets to non operated assets, from a limited set of high risk countries to investments well spread all over the world and from primarily onshore, conventional assets to a full range of asset classes (including unconventional, deepwater and oil sands). Several reasons lie behind this shift: the scarcity of Sudan-like opportunities (large amounts of relatively low-cost, onshore conventional oil), the wish to share risk (both technical and political), the wish to avoid making very large investments in a single high risk country like Sudan (were the total investment eventually amounted to some $20 bn) and the increased importance to get access to western technology (as remaining opportunities tend to be associated with unconventional, deepwater or oil sands deposits – none of which relate to the core technical strengths of Chinese NOCs). Landmark acquisitions during this period were the $15 bn takeover by CNOOC of Canadian oil company Nexen in 2013 (following a 2005 failed attempt by CNOOC to take over Unocal, in spite of putting a bid on the table that was over 10% higher than the eventually successful bid by Chevron) and the takeover by Sinopec of the Swiss-based oil company Addax in 2009. The question whether the Chinese NOCs did systematically overpay has generated a lot of discussion. Several papers (e.g., by Derek Scissors) have maintained that this is the case, often within the context of increasing Chinese influence in general. Many reports on Chinese acquisitions contain statements that they “again overpaid wildly” but I have seen very few systematic studies. The few I have found (e.g. a very interesting paper by Anatole Pang, one of the few papers written by someone with Chinese industry experience) were academic studies that claim they found no evidence for systematic overpaying. As these studies are based on the cost of reserves I tend to doubt their conclusions. A deal where say 2 dollar per barrel of proved reserves is paid can be a deal that is worse than one where say 20 dollar per barrel of proved reserves is paid; it all depends on development costs, tax regime, etc. I think that looking at takeover premiums for acquisitions of publicly listed companies is the best way to deduce whether Chinese NOCs did overpay. Based on this it seems likely that Chinese NOCs did indeed overpay – by an amount of the order of 20 – 50%. Where publicly traded companies have been acquired the premiums paid by Chinese NOCs have been hefty. Premiums paid for the Addax and Nexen takeovers were 47 and 60% respectively; significantly above the average premium in the energy sector of about 30-40%. In takeovers of assets that were not listed they have frequently outbid competitors by significant amounts (I am not aware of any examples of the reverse). Several factors may contribute to overpaying. Chinese NOCs may feel overpaying is necessary to overcome political resistance and to preclude a long bidding competition that may generate adverse publicity. Government approval is required and, once obtained, may be an incentive to come to a successful bid. Failed takeovers may be seen as loss of face. Government policy for the NOCs was focused on volumes and growth rather than value until recently. And finally access to funding at relatively easy terms by Chinese banks may provide less of an incentive to bargain hard for a lower price. Nevertheless, the financial performance of Chinese NOCs’ overseas acquisitions is not so much hampered by paying more than their competitors but rather by the unfortunate timing of their acquisitions. By far the greatest amount of takeover activity took place in the 2009-2013 high oil price world. A lot of money was spent on high production cost assets, such as (Canadian) oil sands or (North Sea) mature fields that were bought at the peak of the market. These assets have performed particularly poorly in the post 2014 low oil price world. An example is the 2012 acquisition of a 49% stake for $1.5 bn in Talisman’s UK assets by Sinopec. Relatively high field decline rates, a high downtime of ageing facilities and increasing estimates of future abandonment costs limited the attractiveness of these assets already in a high oil price world (many North Sea operators have been trying to divest these kind of assets for years, with few takers). With the 2014 oil price collapse this turned into a disastrous cocktail and the poor performance of its UK assets threatened to bring down Talisman as a whole (a company already weakened by low American shale gas prices). Efforts to further divest their North Sea assets were unsuccessful and in 2014 the company was taken over by Repsol. Repsol was interested in other parts of Talisman and saw little value in the North Sea assets, especially when oil prices turned out to be lower for longer. For Sinopec a $1.5 bn investment turned into an abandonment-related liability within 3 years. Sinopec’s subsequent legal demand for compensation from Repsol is seen as having a very low chance of success. It is a sign of their frustration, a way to put pressure on Repsol (which values good relations with Chinese NOCs with whom it cooperates elsewhere) and stakeholder management with respect to the Chinese government. Another example is CNOOC’s $15 bn Nexen takeover. Nexen, a Canadian company, is heavily exposed to high cost Canadian oil sands. Apart from its high costs, these assets suffer from being landlocked. The US blocking the Keystone XL pipeline will now result in a lower price for Canadian oil for a longer time. Even among other oil sands assets Nexen’s assets are relatively high cost and have been recently plagued by operational issues. Many Chinese and Chinese companies lack a profound understanding of the western world (in the same way as many in the western world lack an in depth understanding of China). China should perhaps be seen as a parallel universe instead of just another country. As a result they are not optimally equipped to fully analyze the technical, political and environmental risks associated with an overseas investment. Of course many western companies have had their share of acquisitions turned sour. But I would argue that on average they have a better track record (paying lower takeover premiums, being more reluctant to invest in high cost mature North Sea fields or Canadian oil sands, making a better assessment of political and technical risk). From 2014 onwards overseas investments have decreased dramatically. The current low oil price environment definitely plays a role here. Profits have dramatically decreased as a result of the low oil price and write-offs of previous acquisitions. Internal funding of acquisitions has become more difficult. Funding is still possible, however, and the current low oil price environment is not the only reason for the overseas investments drop. Management of the Chinese NOCs is currently under intense pressure due to the ongoing reforms of SOEs (triggered by their poor performance) and corruption probes. A high publicity audit of a $10 bn investment by Sinopec in Angola revealed shady deals with Sonangol through obscure companies known informally as the Queensway group. Angolan assets put on the market by western oil companies ended up (upon Sonangol exercising its preemptive rights) with companies such as China Sonangol, owned jointly by Sonangol and Chinese middlemen (but funded by Sinopec). When these assets would eventually be transferred to Sinopec (more likely so for the poorly performing assets) it would be at a substantially higher price. The Financial Times reporting on the Queensway group is one of the few cases were investigative journalism has been able to unravel the dealings of Chinese NOCs and their middlemen in some detail. Over the last 2 years former presidents of both CNPC and Sinopec have been convicted for corruption. Many other high ranking managers have been placed under investigation or convicted. The most prominent case was that of Zhou Yangkang, who after his spell as CNPC president eventually became a member of the CCP standing committee, China’s top decision making body. Corruption may have been but a welcome pretext (the CCP has to be seen as being tough on unpopular corruption); the underlying reasons are more likely to be a combination of a power struggle within the CCP and the removal of people opposed to the reform of poorly performing Chinese SPE’s (as well as the poor performance in itself). Knowing that unsuccessful overseas acquisitions can eventually result in convictions (be it for corruption rather than the acquisitions themselves) has made the Chinese NOCs much more cautious. Future acquisitions should involve smarter investments in quality assets, focusing on value rather than volume. Cost cutting is now starting to result in a significant drop in domestic oil production (which still accounts for over 70% of the total production of Chinese NOCs). 2015 is likely to have been the year that Chinese domestic oil production has peaked. By July 2016, production had dropped by more than 8% from its peak. On the positive side, I would consider the Chinese NOCs to be able operators for their domestic (primarily onshore, conventional) production. Average cost of the order of 30 dollars per barrel imply that these assets generate substantial profits. Twenty years of overseas investments have resulted in equity production that is about 30% of their total production, amounting to over 2 million barrels per day. But what else? Surely, if this were to be a true success story, it should not be just about growth. If it is about energy security it should be noted that oil from the NOCs overseas assets is sold on the open market – and is going to the refinery that is best suited for this quality of oil and is willing to pay the highest price (and not necessarily to China). Control over the strait of Malacca (through which about 80% of China’s oil imports is transported) seems a much bigger issue here. If it is about profitability than I feel that their record of overseas acquisitions is a mixed bag – at best. What hampers them in this regard is their record of overpaying and the timing of the bulk of their acquisitions, which coincided with the 2009-2014 high oil price world. If it is about technical capabilities I note that, whereas they have massively invested in deepwater, oil sand or unconventional, they have done so mostly as non-operators. The technical knowledge acquired by being a non operating partner (or by acquiring a company that is subsequently run at arm’s length) is not of the same order as the technical knowledge needed to operate and grow organically. I do not see the Chinese NOCs operating e.g., deepwater fields across the globe, in a way that the western majors do. Their operated production is still primarily domestic conventional production. I do not think that emulating the western IOCs in operating different types of assets across the world or emulating the US tight oil industry in Chinese tight oil are successful business models for Chinese NOCs. For China as a country I think it would be more beneficial to put a greater emphasis on conventional oil and gas within the Asian continent (in particular, Kazakhstan, Russia, Iran/Iraq), thus aiming at a greater share of conventional assets (closer to the NOCs technical strengths) in locations close to China that at least in part export oil by pipeline to China rather than by tanker through the strait of Malacca. Kazakhstan has so far been one of their more successful overseas investments. The strength of Chinese NOCs (apart from their domestic production) is financial rather than technical. A western company with a similar record of acquisitions would be in severe financial trouble. Not so the Chinese NOCs: the absence of public shareholders with a short time horizon and the funding by Chinese banks imply that for them the rules of the game are different. So far, “China Inc” has bailed them out. Their rapid growth has been fueled by profits from domestic production (in particular in a high oil price world) and by debt. Chinese banks have been more than willing to fund. Chinese people, with their high savings rate (and limited ability to move funds abroad) have few alternatives for their savings. It is for them to ultimately pick up the bill. Chinese SOEs in financial trouble have so far been bailed out. This does not solve the problem though in the long term – it just shifts the problem upwards to the next level (which is basically “China Inc”). When evaluating the strength of Chinese NOCs one cannot look at these companies in isolation; one has to look at them as “part of China”. In the long term, the strength of China and Easternisation are there to stay. How could it be otherwise? As Lee Kuan Yew, the former prime minister of Singapore stated: “Theirs is a culture 4000 years old with 1.3 billion people, with a huge and very talented pool to draw from. How could they not aspire to be number one in Asia, and in time the world?” But in the short term: when will Chinese debt and the ability of China to bail out all its poorly performing SOEs hit a ceiling? At some stage pumping more debt into increasingly unattractive projects has to stop. At this stage Chinese debt is growing at three times the rate of the Chinese economy. With an increasing share of problematic loans the question is not if, but when, there will be a Chinese debt crisis. Chinese that have the means to do so have now started to take their money out of the country. The Chinese NOCs are giants built on shaky foundations for a simple reason: they are part of an even bigger giant – built on even shakier foundations. Jilles van den Beukel worked as a geologist, geophysicist and project manager for Shell in many parts of the world. This paper was first published on his blog JillesonEnergy.


News Article | November 17, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

The report “PET Resin Market by Application (Bottles, Films, Food Packaging, and Others), & PBT Resin Market by Application (Automotive, Electrical & Electronics, Consumer Appliances, and Others) - Global Trends & Forecasts to 2019” report analyzes the global PET & PBT resin market with respect to drivers, opportunities, and trends in different regions. PET & PBT resin consumption is significantly increasing in packgaing and electrical & electronics industry respectively. PET is replacing the conventional packaging materials, such as glass, aluminium paper, and metal due to its light weight; whereas PBT features thermal, dimensional, and moulding stability. The Asia-Pacific region is expected to dominate the PET resin market from 2014 to 2019) with its growing demand for PET resin in different applications, especially bottles, films, and food packgaing segments. The Asia-Pacific and Europe markets are estimated to show a growth of 10.9% and 2.8% respectively during the period under review. PBT is replacing metal in many areas with the same thermo-mechanical properties in automotive applications, eventually driving the PBT resin market. Growth in auto sales and electronics market in emerging economies is also expected to boost the PBT resin market. Indorama Ventures (Thailand) is all set to invest $190 million to build a new PET resin manufacturing plant with an annual capacity of 500,000 tons at Decatur in Morgan County, U.S.The construction of this new facility commenced in 2013 and is set for completion in the fourth quarter of 2015. M&G Chemicals(Luxembourg) awarded a $1 billion engineering, procurement, and construction contract to Sinopec Engineering (Group) Co. Ltd. to build a polyethylene terephthalate-purified terephthalic acid (PTA) plant to be started in 2014 in Corpus Christi, TExas. The plant will produce 600,000 metric tons of PET and 864,000 metric tons of PTA, making it the largest single-line PET and PTA plant in the world. The Asia Pacific region is the largest market, both, in terms of volume and value, followed by Europe, and ROW. China, U.S., Germany, Japan, India, South Korea,Brazil, and Mexico are expected to continue as successful thermoplastic polyester resin markets. The key players in the PET resin market are Indorama Ventures (Thailand), M&G Chemicals (Luxembourg), Jiangsu Sanfangxiang Group (China), Far Eastern New Century (Taiwan), Alpex (Mexico), and others. The main players in the PBT resin market are BASF (Germany), Toray Industries (Japan), Royal DSM N.V. (The Netherlands), E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (U.S.), Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (Saudi Arabia), Nan Ya Plastics (Taiwan), Lanxess Corporations (Germany), Celanese Corporation (U.S.), and others The PET & PBT resin market, in terms of value and volume, depicts the current and future projections according to the parallel economic and industrial outlook. This analysis covers important developments, investments, expansions, mergers & acquisitions, agreements, partnerships, and collaborations of the leading companies. The value of the PET resin market was estimated to be $29,358.5 million in 2013, and is projected to reach $44,581.8 million by 2019, at a CAGR of 7.3%, from 2014 to 2019. The PBT resin market reached $2,112.6 million in 2013 and is projected to reach $2,796.9 million by 2019, at a CAGR of 4.6% during the period of studyThe high demand across the industries, such as bottles, films, and food packaging will increase the overall PET resin consumption. The high demand of PBT resin across the industries, such as electrical & electronics, automotive, and consumer appliances will support the PBT resin market.


The research study Global Petrochemicals Market Research Report - Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast added by DecisionDatabases.com provides a comprehensive market analysis which includes market values, forecasts, as well as a detailed competitive market analysis of major players operational in the industry. Petrochemicals are a large group of chemicals obtained from petroleum and natural gas. These are used by numerous industries like manufacturing, textiles, consumer goods, construction, packaging, plastics, healthcare, and automotive among many others. The global petrochemicals market is primarily driven by this vast end user industry demand. Another major boost to the petrochemicals market is the abundant shale gas discoveries in the U.S. and Canadian region. Shale gas acts as a sustainable (at least a century) feedstock for petrochemicals production. Petrochemicals were conventionally derived from coal, natural gas and other hydrocarbon sources. Moreover the regional supremacy of Middle East in crude oil production is anticipated to continue. This report examines the global petrochemicals market and provides information regarding the revenue (USD Million) and volume (Kilo Tons) for the period 2014 to 2021. It further elaborates the market drivers which contribute to the growth. It then describes the restraints that are faced by the market. The market is classified into various segments with deep analysis of each segment for the study period. A glimpse of the major drivers and restraints affecting this market is mentioned below: A. Drivers > Low labor cost in many regions such as Asia-pacific > Increasing construction market growth  > Increased demand for lightweight and flexible materials Report includes a detailed analysis on value chain in order to provide a holistic view of the petrochemicals market. Value chain analysis comprises detailed evaluation of the roles of various players involved in the petrochemicals industry, from raw material suppliers to end-users. Petrochemical Industry - Product Outlook The petrochemicals market is dominated by ethylene. Ethylene is used as a chemical feedstock for industries like packaging, detergents, coatings, adhesives, transportation, electrical/electronic, textile and construction. Some common polymers of ethylene which are widely used are polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polystyrene (PS). The Middle East and China are scaling up ethylene production by expanding/ adding the plant capacity. This is expected to affect the ethylene prices and its production. In the next 5 years Methanol market is expected to grow at a fast rate. This is based on the emerging use of methanol in gasoline blending and its conversion to Olefins (MTO). Petrochemical Industry - Regional Overview The Middle East is the largest production hub for petrochemicals. The recent lifting of oil sanctions from Iran has also boosted the petrochemicals market of this region. The feedstock abundance, infrastructural support, low production cost and availability of labour have been the major reasons for the growth of this industry in this region. China and India with their Government support are bringing a rapid growth in the consumption of petrochemicals and petrochemical based products. The abundance of shale gas reserves (which act as an alternative feedstock) are revamping the North American chemical industry. Petrochemical Industry - Key Players Some of the key players of this industry which occupy a major global share are BASF SE,   ExxonMobil ,  The Dow Chemical Company , Shell Chemical Company , SABIC, Sinopec Limited , LyondellBasell Industries , Total S.A. ,  Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd. ,  Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC , E. I. Du Pont. Eyeing the growth prospects in this industry the companies are expanding their capacities. Recently Royal Dutch Shell Group, announced the construction of a new ethylene cracker and ethylene derivatives units at the petrochemical complex located at Huizhou, China. It plans to double its existing capacity. Another stalwart market player, Dow Chemical’s, partially owned company – MEGlobal plans to build a petrochemical plant at Freeport which will supply monoethylene glycol. The price volatility of crude oil and natural gas and an increasing demand of bio-based chemicals are anticipated to have an adverse effect on the growth of petrochemicals market. Another area of concern is the environmental impact connected to the petrochemicals production and its product usage. 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3. MARKET ANALYSIS OF PETROCHEMICAL  4. PETROCHEMICAL MARKET ANALYSIS BY PRODUCTS 5. PETROCHEMICAL MARKET ANALYSIS BY APPLICATIONS 6. PETROCHEMICAL MARKET ANALYSIS BY REGION 7. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE OF PETROCHEMICAL COMPANIES 8. COMPANY PROFILES OF PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY DecisionDatabases.com is a global business research reports provider, enriching decision makers and strategists with qualitative statistics. DecisionDatabases.com is proficient in providing syndicated research report, customized research reports, company profiles and industry databases across multiple domains.   Our expert research analysts have been trained to map client’s research requirements to the correct research resource leading to a distinctive edge over its competitors. We provide intellectual, precise and meaningful data at a lightning speed.


News Article | November 1, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

MarketStudyReport.com adds “Global Marine Lubricants Market 2016-2020” new report to its research database. The report spread across 72 pages with table and figures in it. The Research analysts forecast the global marine lubricants market to grow at a CAGR of 4.3% during the period 2016-2020. The functions of marine lubricants on a ship are numerous. Some of the areas of application of marine lubricants onboard a marine vessel includes: - Marine engine cylinder - Ramps and side doors - Lifeboat engines and elevators - Hydraulic systems - Transmission systems and open gears - Bow and stern thrusters - Gas compressors and turbochargers - Rudder and propeller controllers The desired properties of any marine lubricant are highly specific, considering the harsh environment the equipment are subject to in the seas. Browse full table of contents and data tables at https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-marine-lubricants-market-2016-2020/ Covered in this report The report covers the present scenario and the growth prospects of the global marine lubricants market for 2016-2020. The report segments the marine lubricants market by the different product types which include: - Mineral oil based marine lubricants - Synthetic marine lubricants - Bio-based marine lubricants The market is divided into the following segments based on geography: - Americas - APAC - EMEA The Research report, Global Marine Lubricants Market 2016-2020, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers the market landscape and its growth prospects over the coming years. The report also includes a discussion of the key vendors operating in this market. Key vendors - ExxonMobil - Castrol - Chevron - Shell - Total Lubmarine Other prominent vendors - World Fuel Services - Aegean Marine Petroleum - Sinopec - Unimarine - Idemitsu Kosan - Fuchs Lubricants - Gulf Oil - JX Nippon Oil and Energy (ENEOS) - Indian Oil (Servo) Market driver - Growing size of global marine cargo fleet - For a full, detailed list, view our report Market challenge - Increased demand for slow steaming - For a full, detailed list, view our report Market trend - Shift in focus from Europe to Asia - For a full, detailed list, view our report Key questions answered in this report - What will the market size be in 2020 and what will the growth rate be? - What are the key market trends? - What is driving this market? - What are the challenges to market growth? - Who are the key vendors in this market space? - What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the key vendors? - What are the strengths and weaknesses of the key vendors? To receive personalized assistance write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150


LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The dramatic resurgence in US upstream M&A activity since mid-2016 has been driven by the vast resource potential and compelling economics in the Permian Basin. Deals in the Permian accounted for 48%, or $24.8 billion, of total US transaction value in 2016 and an astonishing 77% of the $18.5 billion in deals announced in the first 45 days of 2017, per 1Derrick. Although the buyers have been almost exclusively North America based firms, 1Derrick’s analysis suggests that the M&A market could be on the cusp of a second wave of international investments in US unconventional resource plays. 1Derrick has unveiled new proprietary research that will assist European, Asian, and other investors in identifying and evaluating potential M&A opportunities. “The attractiveness of a de-risked US resource play investment to international buyers is reflected in the capital allocations of major US-based firms with a global portfolio,” said Mangesh Hirve, Chief Operating Officer of 1Derrick. “For example, Chevron is boosting Permian investment by 45% despite an overall 11% reduction in total investment, while Occidental Petroleum is doubling its spending in the play from $600 million to $1-1.4 billion. ExxonMobil made its largest acquisition since it bought $1.6 billion in Bakken assets from Denbury Resources in 2012 with its $5.6 billion January 2017 purchase of Delaware Basin properties. International firms with a limited US portfolio may conclude that US shale is a crucial part of a global upstream portfolio. As research providers, we have expanded our offerings to guide them to the most attractive investments.” The first wave of international investments in US unconventional plays began in 2008 with Statoil (Marcellus) and BP (Fayetteville) acquiring acreage from Chesapeake Energy. Activity surged in 2010-12 as the value of transactions with a European or Asia-Pacific buyer totaled over $67 billion. Major European company deals included the 2010 entrance into the Marcellus by BG and Shell, Statoil’s $4.7 billion 2011 purchase of Bakken-focused Brigham Resources, and Shell’s $1.94 billion purchase of Chesapeake’s southern Delaware Basin assets. Significant transactions by Asian and Australian buyers include mining conglomerate BHP Billiton acquiring Petrohawk Energy for $15 billion, Devon and Sinopec forming $2.2 billion JV for five unconventional plays in US and Pioneer and Sinochem forming $1.7 billion Wolfcamp JV. International investment in US shale dropped off dramatically after 2013, with just $825 million spent by European firms and $1.5 billion by Asian buyers in and after 2014. The plunge in oil prices that roiled the entire oil and gas industry virtually brought the international M&A market to a halt. However, a new investment paradigm has been forged in the aftermath of the oil price crisis, one that once again highlights the attractiveness of US unconventional resources. Dramatically lower drilling, completion and lease operating costs and soaring well productivity have resulted in the best Permian acreages offering IRRs of over 50% even at oil prices under $50/bbl. International investors have demonstrated a willingness to pay a premium to enter de-risked plays with predictable costs in which discovered resources can quickly be converted to production. A bonus is a regulatory environment that may provide additional incentives for US oil and gas. Some Asian companies have already signaled the coming of a potential second wave of international investments in the US resource plays. Yantai Xinchao acquired Midland Basin oil fields for $1.08 billion. Meidu acquired assets from Devon and Silver Oak, and Shun Cheong acquired Eagle Ford assets from Stonegate for $278 million. Also, Thai mining company Banpu acquired Marcellus assets from Chief Oil & Gas and Range Resources. Recent reports indicate Osaka Gas, Kogas and Sinochem are also exploring US resource play investments. “European and Asian firms face two major challenges in identifying the right opportunities in the US resource plays,” said 1Derrick’s Ajit Thomas. “The first is unveiling the full opportunity set in a region where a large portion of the available acreage is held by a plethora of private companies and investment entities with little public disclosure. The second is calculating an accurate valuation of the properties by assessing the drilling results and comparable transaction values of nearby acreage. 1Derrick has developed proprietary research to address both challenges.” To help clients discover all potential opportunities, 1Derrick has uncovered and examined hundreds of “stealth” transactions that were never publicly disclosed. These include, for example, more than 20 significant transactions by Double Eagle Energy, which recently sold 71,000 net acres in the Midland Basin to Parsley Energy for $2.8 billion. This exhaustive research effort, which has resulted in the most comprehensive US deals database in the industry, has also revealed the full holdings of more than 60 private companies, most of them private-equity funded. These include Forge Energy (backed by EnCap and Pine Brook), which has 75,000 net acres in Andres, Gaines, Lubbock, and Pecos counties; Steward Energy II (backed by Natural Gas Partners), which has made multiple acquisitions in Yoakum County; and CrownRock, a JV between CrownQuest and Lime Rock Partners, which has completed several transactions in Howard and Martin counties in the Midland Basin. 1Derrick has also translated its proprietary research into comprehensive acreage maps that display the full holdings of both public and private E&P companies. These maps allow prospective buyers to quickly access analysis on transactions involving nearby acreage. Clients can also identify the owners of the properties and follow through with research on the results of recent drilling and completion activities. Among the large private holdings detailed on 1Derrick maps are the 83,000 net acres in Scurry, Midland, Martin, Glasscock, Howard, Reagan, and Crockett counties held by Trail Ridge Energy, backed by Riverstone Holdings and Trilantic Capital Partners; a 65,000-acre JV between Henry Resources and Riverstone-funded Carrier Energy; and 78,000 acres across the Permian owned by Vermilion Cliffs Partners, which is backed by Old Ironsides Energy. 1Derrick’s Mangesh Hirve concluded, “To date, the surge in Permian activity has been fueled by stock-based acquisitions by US public companies. International companies will bring cash to the table, which should provide them with a rich base of opportunities from PE-backed firms and other investors seeking quick, liquid monetization of their holdings. We will continue to evolve our proprietary research to assist international buyers in accessing these opportunities.” 1Derrick (www.1derrick.com), is an independent oil and gas research firm with offices in Houston, New York, London, Singapore, and Bangalore. For more information on 1Derricks’s industry-leading data and analysis, including the new proprietary research on the Permian Basin and other US unconventional plays, please contact Ajit Thomas at Ajit.Thomas@1Derrick.com or 1.646.284.8661.


— Market Highlights Transformer Oil is used as insulator and coolant in transformers by energy and Power industry. Globe is facing rise of demand for electricity which will lead to the installation of new transformer, replacement of old transformer, installation of grid infrastructure which will lead the market for transformer oil market. Moreover, old and existing networks are not able to meet the new demand for power demand has resulted to modification of the transmission and distribution grid infrastructure. This will impact the growth of the transformer oil market in the forecasted year. Transformer Oil Market is projected to grow at a moderate pace of 7.5% in the next six years. “Ask for your specific company profile and country level customization on reports.” Key Players • Nynas AB • Ergon Inc. • Petrochina Company Limited • APAR Industries Limited • Calumet Specialty Products Partners L.P. • Sinopec Corporation • Hydrodec Group PLC • Cargill Incorporated • Engen Petroleum Limited • Valvoline • San Joaquin Refining Co. Inc. • Gandhar Oil Refinery India Limited North America held the largest share within the Transformer Oil market in 2015, and is expected to continue being a major market during the forecast period. European market is expected to grow at a comparatively slow pace, driven by steady demand from countries such as Russia, U.K., Norway, and the Netherlands. Middle East market is expected to grow a good pace during the forecast period. List of Figures FIGURE 1 Global Transformer oil market segmentation FIGURE 2 Forecast Methodology FIGURE 3 Five Forces Analysis of Global Transformer Oil Market FIGURE 4 Value Chain of Global Transformer Oil Market FIGURE 5 Global Transformer oil Market: By Type, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) FIGURE 6 Global Transformer oil Market: By Application, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) FIGURE 7 Global Transformer oil Market: By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) FIGURE 8 Asia-Pacific Transformer oil Market: By Country, 2016 (%) FIGURE 9 North America Transformer oil Market: By Country, 2016 (%) FIGURE 10 Europe Transformer oil Market: By Country, 2016 (%) FIGURE 11 Rest of the World Transformer oil Market: By Country, 2016 (%) FIGURE 12 Transformer oil, by Region, 2016 (%) FIGURE 13 Transformer oil, by Key players, 2016 (%) FIGURE 14 Market Development Analyses, 2014-2016 (%) Continue……… Taste the market data and market information presented through more than 80 market data tables and figures spread in more than hundred pages of the project report. Avail the in-depth table of content TOC & market synopsis on “Global Transformer Oil Market Information from 2016 to 2022" Target Audience o Transformer Oil manufacturers o Transformer Oil dealers and supplier o Grid Infrastructure player o Energy and power sector o Industry Associations and Publications o Investment bankers and M&A Consultants List of Tables Table 1 Global Transformer Oil Market: By Type, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 2 Naphthenic: Transformer Oil Market, By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 3 Paraffinic: Transformer Oil Market, By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 4 Silicone based Transformer Oil: Transformer Oil Market, By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 5 Bio based Transformer Oil: Transformer Oil Market, By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 6 Global Transformer Oil Market: By Application, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 7 Small transformer: Transformer Oil Market, By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 8 Large Transformers: Transformer Oil Market, By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 9 Utility: Transformer Oil Market, By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 10 Others: Transformer Oil Market, By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 11 Global Transformer Oil Market: By Region, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 12 North America: Transformer Oil Market, By Type, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 13 North America: Transformer Oil Market, By Application, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 14 North America: Transformer Oil Market, By Country, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Table 15 U.S.: Transformer Oil Market, By Type, 2014-2022 (USD Billion) Continue…….. Scope of the report This study provides an overview of the global Transformer Oil industry, tracking market segments across the categorized four geographic regions. The report provides a six-year forecast for the market size in terms of value for North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest of the World. Table of Content 1. Report Prologue 2. Introduction 2.1. Definition 2.2. Scope of the Study 2.2.1. Research Objective 2.2.2. Assumptions 2.2.3. Limitations 2.3. Market Structure 2.4. Market Segmentation 3. Research Methodology 3.1. Research Process 3.2. Primary Research 3.3. Secondary Research 3.4. Market Size Estimation 3.5. Forecast Model 4. Market Dynamics 4.1. Drivers & Opportunities 4.2. Challenges & Restraints 4.3. Value Chain Analysis 4.4. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis 5. Transformer Oil Market, By Type 5.1. Introduction 5.2. Mineral- Naphthenic 5.3. Paraffinic 5.4. Silicone Based Transformer Oil 5.5. Bio Based Transformer Oil 6. Transformer Oil Market, By Application 6.1. Introduction 6.2. Small Transformer 6.3. Large Transformer 6.4. Utility 6.5. Others Continue……… Related Report Global Artificial Lift Market Information by Type (Electric Submersible Pump, Rod Lift, Progressive Cavity Pumps, Gas Lifts, and others), and Region - Forecast to 2022 https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/global-artificial-lift-market-information-from-2011-to-2021 About Market Research Future: At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services. For more information, please visit https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/global-transformer-oil-market-research-report-forecast-to-2022


News Article | October 31, 2016
Site: en.prnasia.com

WUXI, China, Oct. 31, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- The World IoT Expo is held from October 30th to November 1st, 2016 in Wuxi. The expo is jointly hosted by the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology and Jiangsu Provincial People's Government. Jointly supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Global Standard 1 (GS1) and Auto-ID Labs, it is the largest and highest scale national-level exposition of the Internet of Things sector in China. The China International IoT Expo has been held annually since 2010, and has become widely known over the past six years. This October, approved by the CPC Central Committee and State Council, it was renamed as the World Internet of Things Exposition. Compared with previous years, this year's event will boast a larger scale, higher-level participants and more advanced technologies. With numerous exhibits and upgraded technologies, the event fosters a new beginning for the Internet of Things Exposition. With the theme of "Create IoT Era, Share Global Intelligence", this expo consists of various activities including the IoT Wuxi Summit, the main exhibition of IoT applications and products, the China National College Innovation Competition of IoT Applications and the 4th Meeting of the Governing Group of Wuxi National Sensor Network Innovation Demonstration Zone. The IoT Wuxi Summit invited guests from home and abroad, such as the president of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Zhang Xiaogang and deputy secretary-general of ITU Malcolm Johnson, to deliver keynote speeches. The speakers also includes Khalil Najafi, professor of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Division at the University of Michigan; Nadia Magnenat Thalmann, founder and head of the MIRALab Research Laboratory at the University of Geneva; Alain Crozier, head and chief executive of Microsoft Greater China Region; Wu Hequan, academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering; Wang Jian, chief technology officer at Alibaba; Zhang Shunmao, the president of Huawei Marketing and Solutions and Liu Haitao, chairman of World Sensing Net Group (WSN Group). In addition to an IoT competition for college students and a job fair, the event also includes a press conference for releasing the construction plan for a world-class "Internet of Things town" to promote the development of Wuxi's IoT industry. The IoT Wuxi Summit has the following features: More than 3,000 guests from 23 countries and regions attended the exhibition, including 10 ministerial leaders, and 24 academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Chinese Academy of Engineering, directors of international associations, the inventor of the COMS integrated circuit and the founder of MEMS Research Center in Singapore. Participants also include senior managers from State-owned companies such as China Railway, State Grid, Sinopec, PetroChina, Aviation Industry Corporation of China. In addition, professors from MIT, University of Colorado, University of Michigan, University of Cincinnati, University of Washington, University of Geneva of Switzerland, Tsinghua University are also in attendance. Managers in charge of technology at overseas companies including IBM, Siemens, Microsoft, Bosch, GE, Nokia, NTT, SK Telecom, ARM, Kaspersky, Honeywell and Tesla Motors, as well as domestic ones, including China Mobile, China Telecom, China Unicom, Huawei, Lenovo, Inspur, Haier, Midea, Foxconn, Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent, JD.com, Qihoo 360 and Neusoft will also take part in the event. With its exhibition area expanded to 50,000 m2 from 32,000 m2, the expo accommodates 489 exhibitors who will demonstrate technology applications and practical cases to visitors with interactive displays. Companies participating in the Expo include IBM, Siemens, OMRON, ARM, Infineon Technologies, China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom, XCMG, China North Industries Group Corporation, Aisino Corporation, Huawei, ZTE, Alibaba, Tencent, JD.com, AsiaInfo, Hikvision and Lenovo.


News Article | October 31, 2016
Site: www.prnewswire.co.uk

WUXI, China, Oct. 31, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- The World IoT Expo is held from October 30th to November 1st, 2016 in Wuxi. The expo is jointly hosted by the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology and Jiangsu Provincial People's Government. Jointly supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Global Standard 1 (GS1) and Auto-ID Labs, it is the largest and highest scale national-level exposition of the Internet of Things sector in China. The China International IoT Expo has been held annually since 2010, and has become widely known over the past six years. This October, approved by the CPC Central Committee and State Council, it was renamed as the World Internet of Things Exposition. Compared with previous years, this year's event will boast a larger scale, higher-level participants and more advanced technologies. With numerous exhibits and upgraded technologies, the event fosters a new beginning for the Internet of Things Exposition. With the theme of "Create IoT Era, Share Global Intelligence", this expo consists of various activities including the IoT Wuxi Summit, the main exhibition of IoT applications and products, the China National College Innovation Competition of IoT Applications and the 4th Meeting of the Governing Group of Wuxi National Sensor Network Innovation Demonstration Zone. The IoT Wuxi Summit invited guests from home and abroad, such as the president of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Zhang Xiaogang and deputy secretary-general of ITU Malcolm Johnson, to deliver keynote speeches. The speakers also includes Khalil Najafi, professor of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Division at the University of Michigan; Nadia Magnenat Thalmann, founder and head of the MIRALab Research Laboratory at the University of Geneva; Alain Crozier, head and chief executive of Microsoft Greater China Region; Wu Hequan, academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering; Wang Jian, chief technology officer at Alibaba; Zhang Shunmao, the president of Huawei Marketing and Solutions and Liu Haitao, chairman of World Sensing Net Group (WSN Group). In addition to an IoT competition for college students and a job fair, the event also includes a press conference for releasing the construction plan for a world-class "Internet of Things town" to promote the development of Wuxi's IoT industry. The IoT Wuxi Summit has the following features: More than 3,000 guests from 23 countries and regions attended the exhibition, including 10 ministerial leaders, and 24 academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Chinese Academy of Engineering, directors of international associations, the inventor of the COMS integrated circuit and the founder of MEMS Research Center in Singapore. Participants also include senior managers from State-owned companies such as China Railway, State Grid, Sinopec, PetroChina, Aviation Industry Corporation of China. In addition, professors from MIT, University of Colorado, University of Michigan, University of Cincinnati, University of Washington, University of Geneva of Switzerland, Tsinghua University are also in attendance. Managers in charge of technology at overseas companies including IBM, Siemens, Microsoft, Bosch, GE, Nokia, NTT, SK Telecom, ARM, Kaspersky, Honeywell and Tesla Motors, as well as domestic ones, including China Mobile, China Telecom, China Unicom, Huawei, Lenovo, Inspur, Haier, Midea, Foxconn, Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent, JD.com, Qihoo 360 and Neusoft will also take part in the event. With its exhibition area expanded to 50,000 m2 from 32,000 m2, the expo accommodates 489 exhibitors who will demonstrate technology applications and practical cases to visitors with interactive displays. Companies participating in the Expo include IBM, Siemens, OMRON, ARM, Infineon Technologies, China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom, XCMG, China North Industries Group Corporation, Aisino Corporation, Huawei, ZTE, Alibaba, Tencent, JD.com, AsiaInfo, Hikvision and Lenovo.


— "Polyester fibers, the synthetic fibers, are long chain polymers derived from coal, air, water, and petroleum. They are formed through chemical reaction between an acid and alcohol. Federal Trade Commission Definition for Polyester Fiber: A manufactured fiber in which the fiber forming substance is any long-chain synthetic polymer composed of at least 85% by weight of an ester of a substituted aromatic carboxylic acid, including but not restricted to substituted terephthalic units, p (-R-O-CO- C6H4-CO-O-) x and parasubstituted hydroxy-benzoate units, p (-R-O-CO-C6H4-O-) x. (Complete FTC Fiber Rules here.). Commonly, the polyester fiber is mainly formed used polyethylene terephthalate (PET), China's trade name-Dacron, referred to as PET fibers. The PET fibers are currently the largest kinds of synthetic fiber. In addition, there are small amounts of PTT fibers, mainly made by polyethylene terephthalate and propylene glycol. For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com PET fibers are divided into two categories: Polyester Staple Fiber (PSF) and Polyester Filament Yarn (PFY). What ‘more, Polyester Staple Fiber (PSF) is discrepant depending upon the various raw materials. PSF made from PTA & MEG or PET Chips is known as Virgin PSF and PSF made from Recycled PET Flakes is called Recycled PSF. " Scope of the Report: This report focuses on the Polyester Fiber in Global market, especially in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa. This report categorizes the market based on manufacturers, regions, type and application. Market Segment by Manufacturers, this report covers Tongkun Group Reliance Zhejiang Hengyi Group Shenghong Xin Feng Ming Group Hengli Group Billion Industrial Jiangsu Sanfangxiang Group Nanya Rongsheng PetroChemical Sinopec Yizheng Chemical Fibre Zhejiang GuXianDao Industrial Fiber Far Eastern New Century DAK Americas Advansa Lealea Group Petrovietnam Petrochemical and Textile Fiber Joint Stock Company Wellman Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy) Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) South America, Middle East and Africa Market Segment by Applications, can be divided into Apparel Industrial and Consumer Textiles Household and Institutional Textiles Carpets and Rugs Global Polyester Fiber Market by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2021 1 Market Overview 1.1 Polyester Fiber Introduction 1.2 Market Analysis by Type 1.2.1 Polyester Staple Fiber (PSF) 1.2.2 Polyester Filament Yarn (PFY) 1.2.3 1.3 Market Analysis by Applications 1.3.1 Apparel 1.3.2 Industrial and Consumer Textiles 1.3.3 Household and Institutional Textiles 1.4 Market Analysis by Regions 1.4.1 North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) 1.4.1.1 USA 1.4.1.2 Canada 1.4.1.3 Mexico 1.4.2 Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy) 1.4.2.1 Germany 1.4.2.2 France 1.4.2.3 UK 1.4.2.4 Russia 1.4.2.5 Italy 1.4.3 Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) 1.4.3.1 China 1.4.3.2 Japan 1.4.3.3 Korea 1.4.3.4 India 1.4.3.5 Southeast Asia 1.4.4 South America, Middle East and Africa 1.4.4.1 Brazil 1.4.4.2 Egypt 1.4.4.3 Saudi Arabia 1.4.4.4 South Africa 1.4.4.5 Nigeria 1.5 Market Dynamics 1.5.1 Market Opportunities 1.5.2 Market Risk 1.5.3 Market Driving Force 2 Manufacturers Profiles 2.1 Tongkun Group 2.1.1 Business Overview 2.1.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.1.2.1 Type 1 2.1.2.2 Type 2 2.1.3 Tongkun Group Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.2 Reliance 2.2.1 Business Overview 2.2.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.2.2.1 Type 1 2.2.2.2 Type 2 2.2.3 Reliance Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.3 Zhejiang Hengyi Group 2.3.1 Business Overview 2.3.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.3.2.1 Type 1 2.3.2.2 Type 2 2.3.3 Zhejiang Hengyi Group Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.4 Shenghong 2.4.1 Business Overview 2.4.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.4.2.1 Type 1 2.4.2.2 Type 2 2.4.3 Shenghong Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.5 Xin Feng Ming Group 2.5.1 Business Overview 2.5.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.5.2.1 Type 1 2.5.2.2 Type 2 2.5.3 Xin Feng Ming Group Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.6 Hengli Group 2.6.1 Business Overview 2.6.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.6.2.1 Type 1 2.6.2.2 Type 2 2.6.3 Hengli Group Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.7 Billion Industrial 2.7.1 Business Overview 2.7.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.7.2.1 Type 1 2.7.2.2 Type 2 2.7.3 Billion Industrial Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.8 Jiangsu Sanfangxiang Group 2.8.1 Business Overview 2.8.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.8.2.1 Type 1 2.8.2.2 Type 2 2.8.3 Jiangsu Sanfangxiang Group Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.9 Nanya 2.9.1 Business Overview 2.9.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.9.2.1 Type 1 2.9.2.2 Type 2 2.9.3 Nanya Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.10 Rongsheng PetroChemical 2.10.1 Business Overview 2.10.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.10.2.1 Type 1 2.10.2.2 Type 2 2.10.3 Rongsheng PetroChemical Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.11 Sinopec Yizheng Chemical Fibre 2.11.1 Business Overview 2.11.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.11.2.1 Type 1 2.11.2.2 Type 2 2.11.3 Sinopec Yizheng Chemical Fibre Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.12 Zhejiang GuXianDao Industrial Fiber 2.12.1 Business Overview 2.12.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.12.2.1 Type 1 2.12.2.2 Type 2 2.12.3 Zhejiang GuXianDao Industrial Fiber Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.13 Far Eastern New Century 2.13.1 Business Overview 2.13.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.13.2.1 Type 1 2.13.2.2 Type 2 2.13.3 Far Eastern New Century Polyester Fiber Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.14 DAK Americas 2.14.1 Business Overview 2.14.2 Polyester Fiber Type and Applications 2.14.2.1 Type 1 2.14.2.2 Type 2 For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com ABOUT US: Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports features an exhaustive list of market research reports from hundreds of publishers worldwide. We boast a database spanning virtually every market category and an even more comprehensive collection of market research reports under these categories and sub-categories. For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com


Specialty lubricants are superior quality and multi-functional lubricants which are manufactured by using high class raw materials and advanced technologies. In addition to keeping machinery parts moving, an industrial lubricant - oil or grease - can serve many functions to benefit productivity and cost control. However, the stress on machineries is crossing the limits of the conventional lubricants, and hence paving way for specialty lubricants. Growing industrialization in developing nations is one of the major factors expected to aid the global specialty lubricants during 2016-2025. Moreover, increasing construction activities, widening base of small and mid-cap industries and growing demand for highly advanced machineries and equipment are some of the major factors anticipated to boost the demand for specialty lubricants across the world during 2016-2025. In addition, high awareness among engineers about high performance lubricants and superior characteristics of synthetic oil based lubricants coupled with stringent government laws are anticipated to positively influence the global specialty lubricants market during forecast period. According to "Global Specialty Lubricants Market By Type, By End Use, By Region Competition Forecast and Opportunities, 2011 - 2025", the global specialty lubricants market is anticipated to cross $ 81 Billion by the end of 2025. Globally, synthetic oil-based specialty lubricant is the most preferred type of specialty lubricants. High demand for synthetic oil-based specialty lubricants is due to their superior performance at high temperatures, oxidation stability and durability, as compared to conventional mineral oil lubricants. Additionally, North America dominated global demand for specialty lubricants, and the same trend is expected to continue during forecast period as well. Some of the leading players operating in global specialty lubricants market include Klueber, Exxon Mobil, Dow Corning, Sinopec and BASF SE, among others. "Global Specialty Lubricants Market By Type, By End Use, By Region Competition Forecast and Opportunities, 2011 - 2025" discusses the following aspects of global specialty lubricants market: Why You Should Buy This Report? The information contained in this report is based upon both primary and secondary research. Primary research included interaction with specialty lubricants manufacturers, channel partners and industry experts. Secondary research included an exhaustive search of relevant publications like company annual reports, financial reports and proprietary databases. TechSci Research is a leading global market research firm publishing premium market research reports. Serving 700 global clients with more than 600 premium market research studies, TechSci Research is serving clients across 11 different industrial verticals. TechSci Research specializes in research based consulting assignments in high growth and emerging markets, leading technologies and niche applications. Our workforce of more than 100 fulltime Analysts and Consultants employing innovative research solutions and tracking global and country specific high growth markets helps TechSci clients to lead rather than follow market trends. Connect with us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/TechSciResearch Connect with us on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/techsci-research


Teng C.,Beihang University | Qiao J.,Sinopec | Wang J.,Beihang University | Jiang L.,Beihang University | Zhu Y.,Beihang University
ACS Nano | Year: 2016

Biological composites are renowned for their elaborate heterogeneous architectures at multiple scales, which lead to a unique combination of modulus, strength, and toughness. Inspired by biological composites, mimicking the heterogeneous structural design principles of biological composites is a powerful strategy to construct high-performance structural composites. Here, we creatively transfer some heterogeneous principles of biological composites to the structural design of nanocomposite hydrogels. Unique heterogeneous conductive graphene-PNIPAM-clay hydrogels are prepared through a combination of inhomogeneous water removal processes, in situ free-radical polymerization, and chemical reduction of graphene oxide. The nanocomposite hydrogels exhibit hierarchical layered heterogeneous architectures with alternate stacking of dense laminated layers and loose porous layers. Under tensile load, the stiff dense laminated layers serve as sacrificial layers that fracture at a relatively low strain, while the stretchable loose porous layers serve as energy dissipation layers by large extension afterward. Such local inhomogeneous deformation of the two heterogeneous layers enables the nanocomposite hydrogels to integrate superior modulus, strength, and toughness (9.69 MPa, 0.97 MPa, and 5.60 MJ/m3, respectively). The study might provide meaningful enlightenments for rational structural design of future high-performance nanocomposite hydrogels. © 2015 American Chemical Society.


Li X.-Y.,British Geological Survey | Li X.-Y.,China University of Petroleum - Beijing | Zhang Y.-G.,Sinopec
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering | Year: 2011

This paper discusses the concepts of multicomponent seismology and how it can be applied to characterize hydrocarbon reservoirs, illustrated using a 3D three-component real-data example from southwest China. Hydrocarbon reservoirs formed from subtle lithological changes, such as stratigraphic traps, may be delineated from changes in P- and S-wave velocities and impedances, whilst hydrocarbon reservoirs containing aligned fractures are anisotropic. Examination of the resultant split shear waves can give us a better definition of their internal structures. Furthermore, frequency-dependent variations in seismic attributes derived from multicomponent data can provide us with vital information about fluid type and distribution. Current practice and various examples have demonstrated the undoubted potential of multicomponent seismic in reservoir characterization. Despite all this, there are still substantial challenges ahead. In particular, the improvement and interpretation of converted-wave imaging are major hurdles that need to be overcome before multicomponent seismic becomes a mainstream technology. © 2011 Nanjing Geophysical Research Institute.


Wang Y.,Beihang University | Niu J.,Sinopec
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition) | Year: 2011

Iterative Learning Control (ILC) captures interests of many scholars because of its capability of high precision control implement without identifying plant mathematical models, and it is widely applied in control engineering. Presently, most ILC algorithms still follow the original ideas of ARIMOTO, in which the iterative-learning-rate is composed by the control error with its derivative and integral values. This kind of algorithms will result in inevitable problems such as huge computation, big storage capacity for algorithm data, and also weak robust. In order to resolve these problems, an improved iterative learning control algorithm with fixed step is proposed here which breaks the primary thought of ARIMOTO. In this algorithm, the control step is set only according to the value of the control error, which could enormously reduce the computation and storage size demanded, also improve the robust of the algorithm by not using the differential coefficient of the iterative learning error. In this paper, the convergence conditions of this proposed fixed step iterative learning algorithm is theoretically analyzed and testified. Then the algorithm is tested through simulation researches on a time-variant object with randomly set disturbance through calculation of step threshold value, algorithm robustness testing, and evaluation of the relation between convergence speed and step size. Finally the algorithm is validated on a valve-serving-cylinder system of a joint robot with time-variant parameters. Experiment results demonstrate the stability of the algorithm and also the relationship between step value and convergence rate. Both simulation and experiment testify the feasibility and validity of the new algorithm proposed here. And it is worth to noticing that this algorithm is simple but with strong robust after improvements, which provides new ideas to the research of iterative learning control algorithms. ©2011 Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering.


Li Q.,Zhejiang Ocean University | Zheng H.,Sinopec | Wang K.-H.,Zhejiang University
Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics | Year: 2011

A dynamic model of a friction pile embedded in saturated soil is established on the basis of interface model with a frequent-dependent damping between the pile and the soil. With the use of potential functions and a variable separation method, the pile dynamic response to an arbitrary vertical load is analytically derived in a closed form under the assumption of the imperfect contact between the pile and soil and an elastic bearing at the pile toe. Furthermore, a parametric study is conducted to find out the main features of the soil-pile interaction, as a result, the bearing stiffness at pile toe and soil stiffness of the pile shaft have major effects on dynamic load transfer at the contact surface of the pile and soil. And frequent dependent damping of the contact surface can restrain high frequency divergence effectively. Finally, it is shown that the theoretical curves of the present solution are in good agreement with those obtained from pile integrity test.


Zhang J.,Heriot - Watt University | Zhang J.,China University of Petroleum - Beijing | Bian X.,Sinopec
Fuel | Year: 2014

A Gum fracturing fluid compatible fracture stabilizers was selected through experimental evaluation in the former research. The simulation experiments show that the flow conductivity of fractures could be maintained by fracture stabilizer, and the number of intrusive particles in the proppant processed by stabilizers was significantly reduced. The dosage of the fracture stabilizer was optimized according to comprehensive experiments of long term conductivity and sand control effect under condition of bilinear flow. Results showing that conductivity decreases over time and reaches steady state after 5 days. The conductivity reduction decreases with the increase of stabilizer mass fraction. After a comprehensive evaluation, fracture stabilizer of 3-5% mass fraction is recommended. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Zhang Y.,CAS Chengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry | Zhang Y.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences | Feng Y.,CAS Chengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry | Feng Y.,Sinopec | And 3 more authors.
Langmuir | Year: 2013

Recent research has highlighted a growing focus on stimuli-responsive surfactant wormlike micelles (WLMs), particularly those with switchability. Here we report CO2-switchable WLMs based on the commercial anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-1, 3-propanediamine (TMPDA) mixed in a mole ratio of 2:1. When CO2 is bubbled into an aqueous mixture of these reactants, the TMPDA molecules are protonated to form quaternary ammonium species, two of which in the same protonated TMPDA molecule "bridge" two SDS molecules by noncovalent electrostatic attraction, behaving like a pseudogemini surfactant and forming viscoelastic WLMs as verified by cryo-TEM. Upon removal of CO2, the quaternized spacers are deprotonated back to tertiary amines, dissociating the pseudogeminis back to conventional SDS molecules that form low-viscosity spherical micelles. Such a reversible sphere-to-worm transition could be repeated several cycles without a loss of response to CO2. © 2013 American Chemical Society.


News Article | November 28, 2016
Site: www.marketwired.com

DUBLIN, IRELAND--(Marketwired - Nov. 28, 2016) - Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. ( :FOG)(ESM:FAC)(TSX VENTURE:FO) announces that it has filed its Interim Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended 30 September 2016 and the accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A"). The following should be read in conjunction with the complete unaudited unreviewed Interim Financial Statements and the accompanying MD&A for the three and nine months ended 30 September 2016, which are available on the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval ("SEDAR") at www.sedar.com and on Falcon's website at www.falconoilandgas.com. Falcon has been informed Renova Asset Holding Ltd., a subsidiary of Renova Holding Ltd. ("Renova Holding") acquired beneficial ownership of 6,273,500 common shares ("Shares") of Falcon at US$0.0904, representing approximately 0.68% of Falcon's issued and outstanding Shares. Following the acquisition, Renova Holding has a beneficial ownership over an aggregate of 157,083,634 Shares, representing approximately 17.05% of Falcon's issued and outstanding Shares. Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks, other short term highly liquid investments with initial maturities of three months or less at inception and bank overdrafts where a legal right of offset exists. Cash on deposit represents cash on deposit with a maturity in excess of three months. This announcement has been reviewed by Dr. Gábor Bada, Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd's Head of Technical Operations. Dr. Bada obtained his geology degree at the Eötvös L. University in Budapest, Hungary and his PhD at the Vrije Aniversiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. He is a member of AAPG and EAGE. All dollar amounts in this document are in United States dollars "$", except as otherwise indicated. Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd is an international oil & gas company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of conventional and unconventional oil and gas assets, with the current portfolio focused in Australia, South Africa and Hungary. Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd is incorporated in British Columbia, Canada and headquartered in Dublin, Ireland with a technical team based in Budapest, Hungary. For further information on Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. please visit www.falconoilandgas.com Origin Energy (ASX:ORG) is the leading Australian integrated energy company with market leading positions in energy retailing (approximately 4.3 million customers), power generation (approximately 6,000 MW of capacity owned and contracted) and natural gas production (1,093 PJ of 2P reserves and annual production of 82 PJe). To match its leadership in the supply of green energy, Origin also aspires to be the number one renewables company in Australia. Through Australia Pacific LNG, its incorporated joint venture with ConocoPhillips and Sinopec, Origin is developing Australia's biggest CSG to LNG project based on the country's largest 2P CSG reserves base. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Certain information in this press release may constitute forward-looking information. This information is based on current expectations that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Such information may include, but is not limited to comments made with respect to the type, number, schedule, stimulating, testing and objectives of the wells to be drilled in the Beetaloo basin Australia, expected contributions of the partners, the prospectivity of the Middle Velkerri & Kyalla shale plays, the prospect of the exploration programme being brought to commerciality and the awarding of an exploration license in South Africa. Actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. Falcon assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those reflected in the forward looking-statements unless and until required by securities laws applicable to Falcon. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is contained in Falcon's filings with the Canadian securities regulators, which filings are available at www.sedar.com.


News Article | November 1, 2016
Site: www.prnewswire.co.uk

WUXI, Chine, 1 novembre 2016 /PRNewswire/ - L'Expo mondiale de l'internet des objets (IdO) se tient du 30 octobre au 1er novembre 2016 à Wuxi. Elle est organisée conjointement par le ministère chinois de l'industrie et des technologies de l'information, le ministère chinois des sciences et de la technologie et le gouvernement du Jiangsu populaire provincial. À la fois soutenue par l'Académie chinoise des sciences (ACS), l'Union internationale des télécommunications (UIT), l'Institut des ingénieurs électriciens et électroniciens (IEEE), Global Standard 1 (GS1) et Auto-ID Labs, elle constitue la plus grande exposition nationale consacrée au secteur de l'internet des objets en Chine. L'Expo internationale chinoise de l'internet des objets a lieu chaque année depuis 2010 et s'est fait connaître plus largement au cours des six dernières années. En ce mois d'octobre, avec l'accord du Comité central du PCC et du Conseil d'État, elle a été rebaptisée « Exposition mondiale de l'internet des objets ». Cette année, l'événement se déroulera à plus grande échelle, accueillera des participants de plus haut niveau et exposera des technologies plus avancées. L'événement constitue un nouveau départ pour l'Exposition de l'internet des objets grâce à des expositions multiples et des technologies améliorées. Autour du thème « Créer l'ère de l'IdO et partager l'intelligence mondiale » l'exposition propose diverses activités, y compris le Sommet mondial de l'IdO de Wuxi, l'exposition principale consacrée aux produits et applications de l'IdO, le concours d'innovation en matière d'applications de l'IdO opposant les universités chinoises et la 4e réunion de la Wuxi National Sensor Network Innovation Demonstration Zone. Le Sommet mondial de l'IdO de Wuxi a convié des personnalités nationales et internationales, telles que Zhang Xiaogang, le président de l'Organisation internationale de normalisation (ISO) et Malcolm Johnson, le secrétaire général adjoint de l'UIT à prendre la parole. Parmi les orateurs figurent également Khalil Najafi, professeur du département du génie électrique et informatique de l'Université du Michigan ; Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, fondatrice et directrice du Laboratoire de recherche MIRALab de l'Université de Genève ; Alain Crozier, président-directeur général de Microsoft pour la région Grande Chine ; Wu Hequan, académicien de l'Académie chinoise d'ingénierie ; Wang Jian, directeur de la technologie chez Alibaba ; Zhang Shunmao, président de Huawei Marketing and Solutions et Liu Haitao, président de World Sensing Net Group (WSN Group). En plus d'un concours de l'IdO destiné aux étudiants et d'un salon de l'emploi, l'événement prévoit également une conférence de presse qui dévoilera le plan de construction d'une « ville de l'IdO » de classe mondiale visant à promouvoir le développement de l'industrie de l'IdO à Wuxi. Le Sommet mondial de l'IdO de Wuxi présente les caractéristiques suivantes : Plus de 3 000 personnes de 23 pays et régions ont participé à l'exposition, dont 10 dirigeants ministériels et 24 académiciens de l'Académie chinoise des sciences et de l'Académie chinoise d'ingénierie, des directeurs d'associations internationales, l'inventeur du circuit intégré COMS et le fondateur du centre de recherche sur les microsystèmes électromécaniques de Singapour. Les participants comprennent également les cadres supérieurs d'entreprises publiques telles que China Railway, State Grid, Sinopec, PetroChina, Aviation Industry Corporation of China. En outre, les professeurs du MIT, de l'Université du Colorado, de l'Université du Michigan, de l'Université de Cincinnati, de l'Université de Washington, de l'Université de Genève en Suisse, de l'Université de Tsinghua sont également présents. Les gestionnaires en charge de la technologie dans des entreprises étrangères, y compris IBM, Siemens, Microsoft, Bosch, GE, Nokia, NTT, SK Telecom, ARM, Kaspersky, Honeywell et Tesla Motors, ainsi que des entreprises nationales, y compris China Mobile, China Telecom, China Unicom, Huawei, Lenovo, Inspur, Haier, Midea, Foxconn, Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent, JD.com, Qihoo 360 et Neusoft prendront également part à l'événement. En passant d'un espace d'exposition de 32 000 à 50 000 m2, le salon peut désormais accueillir quelque 489 exposants qui proposeront aux visiteurs des démonstrations d'applications technologiques et des cas pratiques par l'intermédiaire d'expositions interactives. Les entreprises participant à l'Expo comprennent IBM, Siemens, OMRON, ARM, Infineon Technologies, China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom, XCMG, China North Industries Group Corporation, Aisino Corporation, Huawei, ZTE, Alibaba, Tencent, JD.com, AsiaInfo, Hikvision et Lenovo.


This report studies sales (consumption) of Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) in United States market, focuses on the top players, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player, covering Asahi Kasei Firestone JSR LANXESS Michelin Goodyear Trinseo Kumho Petr Dynasol Zeon LG Chem Eni Sibur Sumitomo TSRC Chi Mei NKNH Karbochem Sinopec CNPC View Full Report With Complete TOC, List Of Figure and Table: http://globalqyresearch.com/united-states-solution-polymerized-styrene-butadiene-rubber-ssbr-market-report-2016 Split by product types, with sales, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 United States Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Market Report 2016 1 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) 1.2 Classification of Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 United States Market Size Sales (Value) and Revenue (Volume) of Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) (2011-2021) 1.4.1 United States Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.4.2 United States Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 5 United States Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 5.1 Asahi Kasei 5.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 5.1.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.1.2.1 Type I 5.1.2.2 Type II 5.1.3 Asahi Kasei Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.2 Firestone 5.2.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.2.2.1 Type I 5.2.2.2 Type II 5.2.3 Firestone Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.3 JSR 5.3.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.3.2.1 Type I 5.3.2.2 Type II 5.3.3 JSR Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.4 LANXESS 5.4.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.4.2.1 Type I 5.4.2.2 Type II 5.4.3 LANXESS Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.5 Michelin 5.5.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.5.2.1 Type I 5.5.2.2 Type II 5.5.3 Michelin Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.6 Goodyear 5.6.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.6.2.1 Type I 5.6.2.2 Type II 5.6.3 Goodyear Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.7 Trinseo 5.7.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.7.2.1 Type I 5.7.2.2 Type II 5.7.3 Trinseo Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.8 Kumho Petr 5.8.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.8.2.1 Type I 5.8.2.2 Type II 5.8.3 Kumho Petr Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.9 Dynasol 5.9.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.9.2.1 Type I 5.9.2.2 Type II 5.9.3 Dynasol Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.10 Zeon 5.10.2 Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Product Type, Application and Specification 5.10.2.1 Type I 5.10.2.2 Type II 5.10.3 Zeon Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.11 LG Chem 5.12 Eni 5.13 Sibur 5.14 Sumitomo 5.15 TSRC 5.16 Chi Mei 5.17 NKNH 5.18 Karbochem 5.19 Sinopec 5.20 CNPC Global QYResearch ( http://globalqyresearch.com/ ) is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.


News Article | November 23, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes: Sales, means the sales volume of Gasoline Lubricants Revenue, means the sales value of Gasoline Lubricants This report studies sales (consumption) of Gasoline Lubricants in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Shell ExxonMobil BP TOTAL Chevron FUCHS Valvoline Idemitsu Kosan Lukoil JX Group SK Lubricants ConocoPhillips Hyundai Oilbank Sinopec CNPC DongHao LOPAL Copton Luroda Jiangsu Gaoke Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Gasoline Lubricants in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like United States China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Gasoline Lubricants in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales Market Report 2016 1 Gasoline Lubricants Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Gasoline Lubricants 1.2 Classification of Gasoline Lubricants 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Gasoline Lubricants 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Gasoline Lubricants Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Gasoline Lubricants (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Gasoline Lubricants Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application 2.1 Global Gasoline Lubricants Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1.1 Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.1.2 Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.2 Global Gasoline Lubricants (Volume and Value) by Type 2.2.1 Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.2.2 Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.3 Global Gasoline Lubricants (Volume and Value) by Regions 2.3.1 Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.3.2 Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.4 Global Gasoline Lubricants (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of Gasoline Lubricants Table Classification of Gasoline Lubricants Figure Global Sales Market Share of Gasoline Lubricants by Type in 2015 Figure Type I Picture Figure Type II Picture Table Applications of Gasoline Lubricants Figure Global Sales Market Share of Gasoline Lubricants by Application in 2015 Figure Application 1 Examples Figure Application 2 Examples Figure United States Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure China Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Europe Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Japan Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Figure 2015 Gasoline Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Gasoline Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers Table Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table 2015 Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2016 Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Gasoline Lubricants by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Gasoline Lubricants Sales Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Revenue Market Share of Gasoline Lubricants by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Gasoline Lubricants Revenue Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US@   Gasoline Lubricants Sales Global Market Research Report 2016


News Article | November 23, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes: Sales, means the sales volume of Auto Lubricants Revenue, means the sales value of Auto Lubricants This report studies sales (consumption) of Auto Lubricants in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Shell ExxonMobil BP TOTAL Chevron FUCHS Valvoline Idemitsu Kosan Lukoil JX Group SK Lubricants ConocoPhillips Hyundai Oilbank Sinopec CNPC DongHao LOPAL Copton Luroda Jiangsu Gaoke Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Auto Lubricants in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like United States China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Auto Lubricants in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Auto Lubricants Sales Market Report 2016 1 Auto Lubricants Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Auto Lubricants 1.2 Classification of Auto Lubricants 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Auto Lubricants 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Auto Lubricants Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Auto Lubricants (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Auto Lubricants Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Auto Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Auto Lubricants Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application 2.1 Global Auto Lubricants Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1.1 Global Auto Lubricants Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.1.2 Global Auto Lubricants Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.2 Global Auto Lubricants (Volume and Value) by Type 2.2.1 Global Auto Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.2.2 Global Auto Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.3 Global Auto Lubricants (Volume and Value) by Regions 2.3.1 Global Auto Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.3.2 Global Auto Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.4 Global Auto Lubricants (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of Auto Lubricants Table Classification of Auto Lubricants Figure Global Sales Market Share of Auto Lubricants by Type in 2015 Figure Type I Picture Figure Type II Picture Table Applications of Auto Lubricants Figure Global Sales Market Share of Auto Lubricants by Application in 2015 Figure Application 1 Examples Figure Application 2 Examples Figure United States Auto Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure China Auto Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Europe Auto Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Japan Auto Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Auto Lubricants Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Auto Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global Auto Lubricants Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Auto Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Figure 2015 Auto Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Auto Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers Table Global Auto Lubricants Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Auto Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table 2015 Global Auto Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2016 Global Auto Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global Auto Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Auto Lubricants Sales Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Auto Lubricants by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Auto Lubricants Sales Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Auto Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Auto Lubricants Revenue Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Revenue Market Share of Auto Lubricants by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Auto Lubricants Revenue Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Auto Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Auto Lubricants Sales Share by Regions (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US@   Auto Lubricants Sales Global Market Research Report 2016


News Article | November 23, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes: Sales, means the sales volume of Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue, means the sales value of Diesel Fuel Lubricants This report studies sales (consumption) of Diesel Fuel Lubricants in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Shell ExxonMobil BP TOTAL Chevron FUCHS Valvoline Idemitsu Kosan Lukoil JX Group SK Lubricants ConocoPhillips Hyundai Oilbank Sinopec CNPC DongHao LOPAL Copton Luroda Jiangsu Gaoke Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Diesel Fuel Lubricants in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like United States China Europe Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Diesel Fuel Lubricants in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Market Report 2016 1 Diesel Fuel Lubricants Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Diesel Fuel Lubricants 1.2 Classification of Diesel Fuel Lubricants 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Diesel Fuel Lubricants 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Diesel Fuel Lubricants Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Diesel Fuel Lubricants (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application 2.1 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1.1 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.1.2 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.2 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants (Volume and Value) by Type 2.2.1 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.2.2 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.3 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants (Volume and Value) by Regions 2.3.1 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.3.2 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.4 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of Diesel Fuel Lubricants Table Classification of Diesel Fuel Lubricants Figure Global Sales Market Share of Diesel Fuel Lubricants by Type in 2015 Figure Type I Picture Figure Type II Picture Table Applications of Diesel Fuel Lubricants Figure Global Sales Market Share of Diesel Fuel Lubricants by Application in 2015 Figure Application 1 Examples Figure Application 2 Examples Figure United States Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure China Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Europe Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Japan Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Figure 2015 Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Share by Manufacturers Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table 2015 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2016 Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Diesel Fuel Lubricants by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Revenue Market Share of Diesel Fuel Lubricants by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Revenue Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Share by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Diesel Fuel Lubricants by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Global Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Growth Rate by Regions (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US@   Diesel Fuel Lubricants Sales Global Market Research Report 2016


News Article | November 4, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Global Acrylonitrile (ACN) Market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4% during the forecast period. Asia Pacific, with a CAGR of 5%, will continue to be the leader in acrylonitrile consumption. Europe and North American regions are estimated to show a moderate growth. Total production capacity of acrylonitrile (ACN) was estimated to be 6.9 million tonnes. Asia Pacific accounts for over half of the global production capacity. China and the US have the highest installed capacities. Acrylonitrile is a commodity petrochemical derived from propylene. It is manufactured by the ammoxidation of propylene. Major uses for acrylonitrile are as a monomer in polyacrylonitrile for acrylic fibers, in ABS and SAN resin manufacture as a modifying monomer, and as a chemical intermediate in the manufacture of adiponitrile and acrylamide. Acrylonitrile is used in production of acrylic fibres, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) and nitrile-butadiene-rubber (NBR). Capacity utilization is expected to grow from 86% at present to 92% by 2020. New capacities are expected to be added in China, Iran and Saudi Arabia in the near future. China aims to become more self-sufficient and less dependent on import by adding new ACN plants. Ineos, Asahi Kasei Corporation, Sinopec, Formosa Plastics Corp, Sumitomo Chemical Company Limited, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation and Reliance Industries Limited are some of the major players in acrylonitrile industry. The low per capita consumption of Acrylonitrile products in developing countries such as India, China and Brazil, along with the growth of end-use industries provides a bright future for global Acrylonitrile market. The industry is expected to face certain challenges such as fluctuation of crude oil prices, product commoditization and saturation in demand for Acrylonitrile. 1) The report will be useful in gaining an exhaustive understanding of the regional market. It will also be of assistance in providing a comprehensive analysis of the major trends, innovations and associated prospects for market growth over the coming half a decade 2) The report will be an ideal source material for industry consultants, manufacturers and other interested and allied parties to gain a critical insight into the factors driving and restraining the market, in addition to opportunities offered. 3) The report contains wide range of information about the leading market players and the major strategies adopted by them. 1) Market Definition along with identification of key drivers and restraints for the market. 2) Market analysis with region specific assessments and competition analysis on a global and regional scale. 3) Identification of factors instrumental in changing the market scenarios, rising prospective opportunities and identification of key companies which can influence the market on a global and regional scale. 4) Extensively researched competitive landscape section with profiles of major companies along with their strategic initiatives and market shares. 5) Identification and analysis of the Macro and Micro factors that affect the industry on both global and regional scale. 6) A comprehensive list of key market players along with the analysis of their current strategic interests and key financial information. 4.2.2 Feedstock Shortage because of growth of Shale Gas 6. Regional Market Analysis (Capacity, Supply/demand, Prices, Export and import and Manufacturers and suppliers)


News Article | November 4, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

This report studies Aromatic Compounds in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering  Sinopec  ExxonMobile  Total S.A  China National Petroleum  BP Chemicals  Shell  Reliance Industries  SK  Koch Industries  Formosa Plastics  JX Nippon Oil&Energy  INEOS Group  ConocoPhillips  SABIC  LyondellBasell  Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Aromatic Compounds in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  North America  Europe  China  Japan  Southeast Asia  India For more information or any query mail at [email protected] Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Benzene  Toluene  Xylenes  PAH  Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Aromatic Compounds in each application, can be divided into  Solvent  Additive  Application 3 Global Aromatic Compounds Market Research Report 2016  1 Aromatic Compounds Market Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Aromatic Compounds  1.2 Aromatic Compounds Segment by Type  1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Aromatic Compounds by Type in 2015  1.2.2 Benzene  1.2.3 Toluene  1.2.4 Xylenes  1.2.5 PAH  1.3 Aromatic Compounds Segment by Application  1.3.1 Aromatic Compounds Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015  1.3.2 Solvent  1.3.3 Additive  1.3.4 Application 3  1.4 Aromatic Compounds Market by Region  1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Aromatic Compounds (2011-2021) 2 Global Aromatic Compounds Market Competition by Manufacturers  2.1 Global Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.2 Global Aromatic Compounds Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.3 Global Aromatic Compounds Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.4 Manufacturers Aromatic Compounds Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type  2.5 Aromatic Compounds Market Competitive Situation and Trends  2.5.1 Aromatic Compounds Market Concentration Rate  2.5.2 Aromatic Compounds Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers  2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2011-2016)  3.1 Global Aromatic Compounds Capacity and Market Share by Region (2011-2016)  3.2 Global Aromatic Compounds Production and Market Share by Region (2011-2016)  3.3 Global Aromatic Compounds Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2011-2016)  3.4 Global Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.5 North America Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.6 Europe Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.7 China Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.8 Japan Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.9 Southeast Asia Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.10 India Aromatic Compounds Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 4 Global Aromatic Compounds Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.1 Global Aromatic Compounds Consumption by Regions (2011-2016)  4.2 North America Aromatic Compounds Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.3 Europe Aromatic Compounds Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.4 China Aromatic Compounds Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.5 Japan Aromatic Compounds Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.6 Southeast Asia Aromatic Compounds Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.7 India Aromatic Compounds Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 5 Global Aromatic Compounds Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type  5.1 Global Aromatic Compounds Production and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  5.2 Global Aromatic Compounds Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  5.3 Global Aromatic Compounds Price by Type (2011-2016)  5.4 Global Aromatic Compounds Production Growth by Type (2011-2016) For more information or any query mail at [email protected] Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports features an exhaustive list of market research reports from hundreds of publishers worldwide. We boast a database spanning virtually every market category and an even more comprehensive collection of market research reports under these categories and sub-categories.


News Article | November 1, 2016
Site: www.acnnewswire.com

Can Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and TCL Communication Technology Holdings repeat last year's success? The upcoming IR Magazine Awards - Greater China 2016 will take place at the Conrad in Hong Kong on 6 December, 2016. Following a successful event last year where Kerry Logistics, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and TCL Communication Technology Holdings received multiple awards for their work in investor relations, this year's nominations are highly anticipated - these will be announced on 7 November, 2016. All of IR Magazine's awards are decided by an independent survey of investors and analysts, all of whom are located in the respective region i.e. Europe, US and Canada. Investors and analysts are asked to vote for the company giving them the best IR service in each awards category. This year, more than 200 respondents took part in the survey for Asia. The four or five companies with the most votes in each category make the short list and the company with the most votes wins the award. Votes in the survey also determine the IR Magazine Greater China Top 30, the ranking of the best companies for IR in the region. The votes in each award category are added together and the company with the most votes is declared the top-ranked company in the area. The latest rankings will be revealed in the IR Magazine Investor Perception Study - Asia 2016/2017, which will be published soon after the IR Magazine Awards & Conference - Greater China 2016 on 6 December. Strategic Public Relations Group is proud to be the Official Public Relations Partner for the IR Magazine Awards & Conference - Greater China 2016. About IR Magazine Launched in 1988, IR Magazine is the only global publication that focuses on the interactions between companies and their investors. IR Magazine helps investor relations professionals achieve more in their IR programs, benchmark their efforts and connect to the global IR community. In addition to producing articles, research reports and investor perception studies, IR Magazine also hosts events such as awards, think tanks and conferences around the world. To learn more, please visit our website at www.irmagazine.com or connect with us via Twitter @IRMagazine and the LinkedIn group: IR Magazine. About the IR Magazine Awards & Conference - Greater China 2016 The IR Magazine Awards & Conference - Greater China is among the most anticipated events of the year for the IR industry in Asia. IROs from mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan get the unique opportunity to gather and discuss pressing issues, learn from each other's best practices, and celebrate their achievements at the awards ceremony. The event is co-sponsored by Business Wire, Citigate Dewe Rogerson, Citi, Cornerstone Communications, Deutsche Bank, EQS Group, Hill+Knowlton Strategies, Instinctif Partners, Ipreo, Nasdaq, Orient Capital and Strategic Public Relations Group. Strategic Public Relations Group is proud to be the Official Public Relations Partner for the IR Magazine Awards & Conference - Greater China 2016. For more information, please visit http://events.irmagazine.com/greaterchina/ . LAST YEAR'S (2015) AWARDS SHORTLISTS (Listed alphabetically by company) GRAND PRIX FOR BEST OVERALL INVESTOR RELATIONS (LARGE CAP) China Telecom Delta Electronics MediaTek Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company GRAND PRIX FOR BEST OVERALL INVESTOR RELATIONS (MID-CAP) Kerry Logistics Sa Sa International Samsonite Asia TCL Corporation GRAND PRIX FOR BEST OVERALL INVESTOR RELATIONS (SMALL CAP) Central China Real Estate Far East Consortium International BEST IR BY A MAINLAND CHINA COMPANY (NON-SOE) China Vanke Lenovo TCL Corporation Tencent Holdings BEST IR BY A HONG KONG COMPANY Chow Tai Fook Kerry Logistics Sa Sa International Samsonite Asia BEST IR BY A TAIWANESE COMPANY Delta Electronics Fubon Financial MediaTek Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company BEST INVESTOR RELATIONS OFFICER (LARGE CAP) China Telecom - Lisa Lai & Ivan Wong Chow Tai Fook - Danita On Delta Electronics - Rodney Liu Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company - Dr Elizabeth Sun BEST INVESTOR RELATIONS OFFICER (SMALL & MID-CAP) Far East Consortium International - Venus Zhao Kerry Logistics - Cheryl Yeung KWG Property Holding - Linda Wu TCL Corporation - Kennis Lau MOST PROGRESS IN IR Kerry Logistics PAX Global Technology TCL Corporation SECTOR AWARDS COMMUNICATIONS China Mobile China Telecom SmarTone Telecommunications Tencent Holdings CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY Chow Tai Fook Galaxy Entertainment Sa Sa International Samsonite Asia CONSUMER STAPLES China Mengniu Dairy Company China Modern Dairy Gourmet Master President Chain Store ENERGY China Shenhua Energy MIE Holdings Sinopec Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology FINANCIALS (EXCLUDING REAL ESTATE) Cathay Financial Holdings China Everbright Bank Fubon Financial PAX Global Technology HEALTHCARE China Medical System Holdings Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceuticals INDUSTRIALS China Communications Construction China State Construction Engineering Corporation Kerry Logistics Voltronic Power Technology MATERIALS Baosteel Group Chu Kong Petroleum & Natural Gas Steel Pipe Holdings Taiwan Cement REAL ESTATE China Overseas Land & Investment China Vanke Far East Consortium International Hang Lung Properties TECHNOLOGY Delta Electronics MediaTek Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TCL Corporation UTILITIES Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings CLP Holdings ENN Energy Media enquiries Strategic Public Relations Group Cindy Lung / Jessica Siu Tel: +852 2864 4867 / 2114 2820 Email: / Website: www.sprg.asia


News Article | November 2, 2016
Site: www.prnewswire.co.uk

WUXI, China, 2 de noviembre de 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- La exposición mundial de la IdC se celebra del 30 de octubre al 1 de noviembre de 2016 en Wuxi. La exposición está organizada conjuntamente por el Ministerio Chino de Industria y Tecnología de la Información, el Ministerio Chino de Ciencia y Tecnología y el Gobierno Popular Provincial de Jiangsu. También patrocinada por la Academia China de las Ciencias (ACC), la  Unión Internacional de Telecomunicaciones (UIT), el Instituto de Ingenieros Electricistas y Electrónicos (IIEE), Global Standard 1 (GS1) y Auto-ID Labses la mayor exposición a nivel nacional y la de mayor escala del sector de la Internet de las Cosas en China. La exposición internacional china de la IdC se ha celebrado anualmente desde 2010, y se ha hecho ampliamente conocida en los últimos seis años. Este octubre, aprobada por el Comité Central del CPC y el Consejo de Estado, fue renombrada como la Exposición mundial de la Internet de las Cosas. En comparación con años anteriores, el evento de este año incluirá a participantes de mayor escala y nivel y tecnologías más avanzadas. Con numerosas exhibiciones y tecnologías actualizadas, el evento impulsa un nuevo comienzo para la Exposición de la Internet de las Cosas. Con el tema de "Crear la era IdC, compartir la inteligencia global", esta exposición consiste en varias actividades que incluyen la Cumbre IdC de Wuxi, la principal exposición de aplicaciones y productos IdC, el concurso de innovación en aplicaciones IdC de las universidades nacionales chinas y la cuarta reunión del grupo de gobierno de la Wuxi National Sensor Network Innovation Demonstration Zone. La Cumbre IdC de Wuxi invitó a personalidades nacionales e internacionales, como el presidente de la Organización Internacional de Estandarización (ISO) Zhang Xiaogang y el subsecretario general de ITU Malcolm Johnson, para ofrecer los discursos de apertura. Entre los ponentes también se incluyen:  Khalil Najafi, profesor del departamento de ingeniería de electricidad y computacional en la Universidad de Michigan; Nadia Magnenat Thalmann, fundadora y directora del Laboratorio de investigación MIRALab de la Universidad de Ginebra; Alain Crozier, director y consejero delegado de Microsoft para la región de China continental; Wu Hequan, académico de la Academia China de Ingeniería; Wang Jian, director de Tecnología en Alibaba; Zhang Shunmao, el director general de Huawei Marketing and Solutions y Liu Haitao, presidente de World Sensing Net Group (WSN Group). Además de un concurso sobre IdC para estudiantes universitarios y una feria de empleo, el evento también incluye una rueda de prensa para lanzar el plan de construcción de una "ciudad de Internet de las Cosas" de clase mundial para promover el desarrollo de la industria de la IdC de Wuxi. La Cumbre IdC de Wuxi tiene las siguientes características: Más de 3.000 invitados de 23 países y regiones asistieron a la exposición, incluyendo 10 líderes ministeriales y 24 académicos de la Academia China de las Ciencias y la Academia China de Ingeniería, directores de asociaciones internacionales, el inventor del circuito integrado de COMS y el fundador del Centro de Investigación MEMS en Singapur. Los participantes también incluyen altos directivos de compañías estatales como  China Railway, State Grid, Sinopec, PetroChina, Aviation Industry Corporation of China. Además, los profesores de MIT, Universidad de Colorado, Universidad de Michigan, Universidad de Cincinnati, Universidad de Washington, Universidad de Ginebra de Suiza, Universidad Tsinghua también asistieron. Los gestores a cargo de tecnología en compañías internacionales como IBM, Siemens, Microsoft, Bosch, GE, Nokia, NTT, SK Telecom, ARM, Kaspersky, Honeywell y Tesla Motors, así como naionales, como China Mobile, China Telecom, China Unicom, Huawei, Lenovo, Inspur, Haier, Midea, Foxconn, Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent, JD.com, Qihoo 360 y Neusoft también participaron en el evento. Con su área de exposición ampliada a 50.000 m2 desde 32.000 m2, la exposición aloja 489 expositores que demuestran aplicaciones tecnológicas y casos prácticos a los visitantes con pantallas interactivas. Las compañías participantes en la exposición son IBM, Siemens, OMRON, ARM, Infineon Technologies, China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom, XCMG, China North Industries Group Corporation, Aisino Corporation, Huawei, ZTE, Alibaba, Tencent, JD.com, AsiaInfo, Hikvision y Lenovo.


Liu Z.,Beijing University of Chemical Technology | Liu Z.,Sinopec | Liu J.,Beijing University of Chemical Technology | Liu J.,Tianjin EV Energies Co. | And 3 more authors.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics | Year: 2014

Carbon coated urchin-like TiO2 microspheres were prepared through coupled hydrolysis of titanium tetrachloride and catalyzed carbonization of glucose. Carbon coating endowed the composite with unusual structural stability at high temperature and reasonable Li-ion battery performance. This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2014.

Loading Sinopec collaborators
Loading Sinopec collaborators