Yuan Y.,Shanghai JiaoTong University |
Che X.,Shanghai JiaoTong University |
Ni Z.,Shanghai JiaoTong University |
Zhong Y.,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine |
And 9 more authors.
PLoS ONE | Year: 2015
Background and Objectives Renal relapse is a very common manifestation of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). The clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of this condition have not yet been carefully explored. Design and Patients Patients with biopsy-proven IgAN between January 2005 and December 2010 from three medical centers in China was a primary cohort of patients. From January 2010 to April 2012, data of an independent cohort of IgAN patients from Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai, China was collected using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients formed the validation cohort of this study. Results Of the patients with biopsy-proven IgAN from three medical centers, 489 patients achieved remission within 6 months following the therapy. Additionally, 76 (15.5%) of these patients experienced a relapse after achieving remission. During the median follow-up period of 66 months, 6 patients (1.4%) in the non-relapse group experienced renal deterioration, compared with 22 patients (29.6%) in the relapse group. Our study indicated that each 1-mmHg increase in the baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was associated with a 4.5% increase in the risk of renal relapse; additionally, the male patients had a 3.324-fold greater risk of relapse compared with the female patients according to the adjusted multivariate Cox analysis. The nomogram was based on 489 patients achieved remission. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. The results were validated using bootstrap resampling on the validation cohort. Conclusions This study demonstrated that renal relapse is a potential predictor of prognostic outcomes in patients under the current therapeutic regimens for IgAN. And male patients with higher diastolic blood pressure had a greater risk of experiencing relapse. Source
Wang J.,Punan Hospital of Shanghai |
Liu D.,Punan Hospital of Shanghai |
Zhou W.,Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch |
Wang M.,Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch |
And 2 more authors.
Medical Oncology | Year: 2014
The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of matrix metalloprotease-1 (MMP-1) and its receptor protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) coexpression with the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect the expression changes of MMP-1 and PAR-1 proteins in 180 pairs of human PCa tissues and matched non-cancerous prostate tissues. Then, the associations of combined MMP-1 and PAR-1 expression with selected clinicopathological characteristics and patient prognosis were evaluated. Both MMP-1 and PAR-1 proteins were positively localized in cytoplasmof tumor cells in PCa tissues. Compared with non-cancerous prostate tissues, MMP-1 (PCa vs. Normal: 4.15 ± 1.28 vs. 2.37 ± 1.16, P < 0.001) and PAR-1 (PCa vs. Normal: 3.71 ± 1.21 vs. 1.55 ± 1.12, P < 0.001) protein expressionwere both significantly upregulated. More interestingly, the expression levels of MMP-1 in PCa tissues were positively correlated with those of PAR-1 significantly (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.88, P < 0.001). In addition, the coexpression of MMP-1 and PAR-1 (MMP-1-high/PAR-1-high) in PCa tissues was significantly associated with the higher Gleason score (P < 0.001), the presence of metastasis (P < 0.001) and the advanced pathological stage (P = 0.009). Furthermore, both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that MMP-1-high/PAR-1-high expression was an independent predictor for both unfavorable overall survival and biochemical recurrence-free survival. These findings confirmed for the first time that the upregulation of MMP-1 protein combined with the overexpression of PAR-1 protein may contribute to the malignant progression of PCa. More importantly, MMP-1/PAR-1 axis may be a negative prognostic factor for patients with PCa. © Springer Science+Business Media 2014. Source