Yoshida S.,University of Tokyo |
Yoshida S.,Japan Society for the Promotion of Science |
Hirai K.,Osaka University |
Morita T.,Seirei Hospice |
And 5 more authors.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | Year: 2011
Context: Prognosis is difficult to discuss with patients who have advanced cancer and their families. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the experiences of families of patients with cancer in Japan in receiving prognostic disclosure, explore family perception of the way the prognosis was communicated, and investigate relevant factors of family-perceived need for improvement. Methods: A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted with 666 bereaved family members of patients with cancer who were admitted to palliative care units in Japan. Results: In total, 86.3% of the families received prognostic disclosure. The overall evaluation revealed that 60.1% of the participants felt that the method of prognostic disclosure needed some, considerable, or much improvement. The parameter with the highest value explaining the necessity for improvement was the family perception that the amount of information provided by the physician was insufficient (beta = 0.39, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the family perception that they had lost hope and that health care providers failed to facilitate preparation for the patient's death had significant direct effects on the necessity for improvement (beta = 0.21, P < 0.001; and beta = 0.18, P < 0.001, respectively). The feelings for the necessity for improvement also were affected significantly by seven communication strategies (i.e., not saying "I can do nothing for the patient any longer," pacing explanation with the state of the patient's and family's preparation, saying "We will respect the patient's wishes," making an effort to understand the family's distress, being knowledgeable about the most advanced treatments, assuring continuing responsibility as the physician for medical care, and respecting the family's values). Conclusion: This model suggests that strategies for care providers to improve family perception about prognostic disclosure should include 1) providing as much prognostic information as families want; 2) supporting families' hopes by keeping up with up-to-date treatments and by assuring the continuing responsibility for medical care; 3) facilitating the preparation for the patient's death by providing information in consideration of the family's preparations and values; 4) stressing what they can do instead of saying that nothing can be done for the patient; and 5) assuring the family that they will respect the patient's wishes. © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Otani H.,National Kyushu Cancer Center |
Morita T.,Seirei Hospice |
Uno S.,Niikuni Naika Clinic |
Yamamoto R.,Saku Central Hospital |
And 4 more authors.
Journal of Palliative Medicine | Year: 2013
Background and Objective: Delirium in terminally ill cancer patients causes considerable distress to family members. The aim was to determine the family-perceived usefulness of a leaflet about delirium in terminally ill cancer patients. Methods: Family members received a leaflet about delirium designed for this study as a part of routine practice. Questionnaires were mailed to bereaved family members of cancer patients recruited from three palliative care units, one hospital palliative care team, and three specialized home care teams in Japan. Results: Among 235 family members, 16 questionnaires were returned as undeliverable, and responses were obtained from 169 bereaved family members (response rate 77%, 169/219). Of these, 22 were excluded because of missing data and 34 families reported they did not recognize that the patient had delirium, and thus 113 responses were finally analyzed. As a whole, 81% of the family members reported that the leaflet was ";very useful"; or ";useful."; Many respondents noted that the leaflet ";helped them understand the dying process"; (84%), ";helped them identify what they could do for the patient"; (80%), ";helped them understand the patient's physical condition"; (76%), and ";was useful in preparing for the patient's death"; (72%). Conclusions: The leaflet about delirium was evaluated as useful for family members. This leaflet could help family members cope with a difficult situation by facilitating accurate understanding of the situation and by helping family members understand what they could do for the patient. More comprehensive intervention programs should be developed and tested in the future. © Copyright 2013, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Morita T.,Seirei Hospice |
Oyama Y.,Kyoto University |
Cheng S.-Y.,National Taiwan University Hospital |
Suh S.-Y.,Dongguk University |
And 6 more authors.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | Year: 2015
Context Clarification of the potential differences in end-of-life care among East Asian countries is necessary to provide palliative care that is individualized for each patient. Objectives The aim was to explore the differences in attitude toward patient autonomy and a good death among East Asian palliative care physicians. Methods A cross-sectional survey was performed involving palliative care physicians in Japan, Taiwan, and Korea. Physicians' attitudes toward patient autonomy and physician-perceived good death were assessed. Results A total of 505, 207, and 211 responses were obtained from Japanese, Taiwanese, and Korean physicians, respectively. Japanese (82%) and Taiwanese (93%) physicians were significantly more likely to agree that the patient should be informed first of a serious medical condition than Korean physicians (74%). Moreover, 41% and 49% of Korean and Taiwanese physicians agreed that the family should be told first, respectively; whereas 7.4% of Japanese physicians agreed. Physicians' attitudes with respect to patient autonomy were significantly correlated with the country (Japan), male sex, physician specialties of surgery and oncology, longer clinical experience, and physicians having no religion but a specific philosophy. In all 12 components of a good death, there were significant differences by country. Japanese physicians regarded physical comfort and autonomy as significantly more important and regarded preparation, religion, not being a burden to others, receiving maximum treatment, and dying at home as less important. Taiwanese physicians regarded life completion and being free from tubes and machines as significantly more important. Korean physicians regarded being cognitively intact as significantly more important. Conclusion There are considerable intercountry differences in physicians' attitudes toward autonomy and physician-perceived good death. East Asia is not culturally the same; thus, palliative care should be provided in a culturally acceptable manner for each country. © 2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Maeda I.,Osaka University |
Morita T.,Palliative Care Team |
Yamaguchi T.,Tohoku University |
Inoue S.,Seirei Hospice |
And 17 more authors.
The Lancet Oncology | Year: 2016
Background: Continuous deep sedation (CDS) before death is a form of palliative sedation therapy that has become a focus of strong debate, especially with respect to whether it shortens survival. We aimed to examine whether CDS shortens patient survival using the propensity score-weighting method, and to explore the effect of artificial hydration during CDS on survival. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of a large multicentre prospective cohort study that recruited and followed up patients between Sept 3, 2012, and April 30, 2014, from 58 palliative care institutions across Japan, including hospital palliative care settings, inpatient palliative care units, and home-based palliative care services. Adult patients (aged ≥20 years) with advanced cancer who received care through the participating palliative care services were eligible for this secondary analysis. Patients with missing data for outcome variables or who lived for more than 180 days were excluded. We compared survival after enrolment between patients who did and did not receive CDS. We used a propensity score-weighting method to control for patient characteristics, disease status, and symptom burden at enrolment. Findings: Of 2426 enrolled patients with advanced cancer, we excluded 289 (12%) for living longer than 180 days and 310 (13%) with missing data, leaving an analysis population of 1827 patients. 269 (15%) of 1827 patients received CDS. Unweighted median survival was 27 days (95% CI 22-30) in the CDS group and 26 days (24-27) in the no CDS group (median difference -1 day [95% CI -5 to 4]; HR 0·92 [95% CI 0·81-1·05]; log-rank p=0·20). After propensity-score weighting, these values were 22 days (95% CI 21-24) and 26 days (24-27), respectively (median difference -1 day [95% CI -6 to 4]; HR 1·01 [95% CI 0·87-1·17]; log-rank p=0·91). Age (pinteraction=0·67), sex (pinteraction=0·26), performance status (pinteraction=0·90), and volume of artificial hydration (pinteraction=0·14) did not have an effect modification on the association between sedation and survival, although care setting did have a significant effect modification (pinteraction=0·021). Interpretation: CDS does not seem to be associated with a measurable shortening of life in patients with advanced cancer cared for by specialised palliative care services, and could be considered a viable option for palliative care in this setting. Funding: Japanese National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
Miura T.,National Cancer Center Hospital East |
Matsumoto Y.,National Cancer Center Hospital East |
Hama T.,Japan National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute |
Amano K.,Osaka City General Hospital |
And 16 more authors.
Supportive Care in Cancer | Year: 2015
Purpose: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which uses C-reactive protein and albumin levels, is a good predictor of prognosis in cancer patients undergoing anti-tumor therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between GPS and survival among cancer patients in palliative settings, as findings in such populations have not been well described. Methods: This was a subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective, cohort study in patients who were adults, diagnosed with advanced cancer, and first referred to palliative care service in Japan. Patients who were not receiving anti-tumor therapy and who had undergone laboratory examinations were eligible. Clinical features were analyzed to investigate prognostic factors. Results: A total of 1160 patients were enrolled (41.6 % female; median age, 72 years). The independent predictors were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 4 (hazard ratio (HR), 1.54), liver metastasis (HR, 1.21), dyspnea (HR, 1.35), edema (HR, 1.25), prognostic performance index (HR, 1.56), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (HR, 1.43), and GPS of 2 (HR, 1.36). The sensitivity and specificity for 3-week prognosis of a GPS of 2 were 0.879 and 0.410. Median survival time with GPS of 0, 1, and 2 was 58 days (95 % confidence interval, 48–81), 43 days (37–50), and 21 days (19–24), respectively (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The GPS was a good prognostic indicator for cancer patients in palliative settings. © 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.