News Article | February 20, 2017
This report studies Out of Band Authentication Software in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Out of Band Authentication Software in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America Europe China Japan Korea Taiwan Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Out of Band Authentication Software in each application, can be divided into Banking Payment Card Industry Government Global Out of Band Authentication Software Market Research Report 2017 1 Out of Band Authentication Software Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Out of Band Authentication Software 1.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Out of Band Authentication Software by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Type I 1.2.3 Type II 1.3 Out of Band Authentication Software Segment by Application 1.3.1 Out of Band Authentication Software Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Banking 1.3.3 Payment Card Industry 1.3.4 Government 1.4 Out of Band Authentication Software Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Korea Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 Taiwan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Out of Band Authentication Software (2012-2022) 7 Global Out of Band Authentication Software Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 CA Technologies 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 188.8.131.52 Product A 184.108.40.206 Product B 7.1.3 CA Technologies Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Gemalto 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 220.127.116.11 Product A 18.104.22.168 Product B 7.2.3 Gemalto Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Strikeforce Technologies 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 22.214.171.124 Product A 126.96.36.199 Product B 7.3.3 Strikeforce Technologies Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Swivel Secure 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 188.8.131.52 Product A 184.108.40.206 Product B 7.4.3 Swivel Secure Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 ASL 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 220.127.116.11 Product A 18.104.22.168 Product B 7.5.3 ASL Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 CensorNet 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 22.214.171.124 Product A 126.96.36.199 Product B 7.6.3 CensorNet Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Deepnet Security 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 188.8.131.52 Product A 184.108.40.206 Product B 7.7.3 Deepnet Security Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 EZMCOM 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 220.127.116.11 Product A 18.104.22.168 Product B 7.8.3 EZMCOM Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Early Warning 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 22.214.171.124 Product A 126.96.36.199 Product B 7.9.3 Early Warning Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 SecurEnvoy 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Out of Band Authentication Software Product Type, Application and Specification 188.8.131.52 Product A 184.108.40.206 Product B 7.10.3 SecurEnvoy Out of Band Authentication Software Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 TeleSign For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/978756-global-out-of-band-authentication-software-market-research-report-2017
News Article | November 23, 2016
Advanced Authentication Market, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers the market landscape and its growth prospects over the coming years. November 23, 2016 /MarketersMedia/ — Data security is a major concern for enterprises, government organizations, and individuals. Identity badges, numeric keypads, and PINs were the most popular devices used to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data and assets. However, hacking these security codes was easy. Advanced authentication solutions, which were introduced in 2012, use a number of authentication techniques such as hardware OTP authentication, smart card-based authentication, phone-based authentication, and biometrics. Advanced authentication solutions are security systems that require two or more types of authentication to verify a transaction, which act as a security layer and make it difficult for an unauthorized person to access a database or computing device. Increased usage of mobile devices such as smartphones, laptops, and tablets for banking and e-commerce has increased the need for advanced authentication solutions. Publisher's analysts forecast the Global Advanced Authentication Market to grow at a CAGR of 16.95% during the period 2016-2020. Complete Report Available at: http://www.reportsweb.com/global-advanced-authentication-market-2016-2020 . Covered in this report The report covers the present scenario and the growth prospects of the Global Advanced Authentication Market for 2016-2020. To calculate the market size, the report considers the revenue generated from the sales of multi-factor authentication solutions (two-factor authentication solutions and three-factor authentication solutions) and biometrics technologies. The revenue includes hardware tokens, biometrics scanners and cameras, software solutions, and services. The revenue generated from after-sales services is not considered. The market is divided into the following segments based on geography: - Americas - APAC - EMEA Publisher's report, Global Advanced Authentication Market 2016-2020, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers the market landscape and its growth prospects over the coming years. The report also includes a discussion of the key vendors operating in this market. Key vendors - CA Technologies - Crossmatch - EMC - Entrust Datacard - Gemalto Get Sample of the Report at: http://www.reportsweb.com/inquiry&RW0001239318/sample . Other prominent vendors - Authenex - BIO-Key - Deepnet Security - Dell - Duo Security - Early Warning - Equifax - FEITIAN Technologies - Fortinet - HID Global - Microsoft - SecureAuth - SecurEnvoy - SecuTech Solutions - SMS Passcode - Swivel Secure - Symantec - Technology Nexus - TeleSign - Tricerion - VASCO - VMware - Yubico Inquire about Report at: http://www.reportsweb.com/inquiry&RW0001239318/buying . Table of Contents PART 01: Executive summary PART 02: Scope of the report PART 03: Market research methodology PART 04: Introduction PART 05: Market description PART 06: Market landscape PART 07: Life cycle analysis PART 08: Market segmentation by technology PART 09: Market segmentation by end-user PART 10: Geographical segmentation PART 11: Buying criteria PART 12: Market drivers PART 13: Impact of drivers PART 14: Market challenges PART 15: Impact of drivers and challenges PART 16: Market trends PART 17: Five forces model PART 18: Vendor landscape PART 19: SWOT analysis PART 20: Appendix PART 21: Explore Publisher Purchase this Report at: http://www.reportsweb.com/buy&RW0001239318/buy/2500 . For more information, please visit http://www.reportsweb.com/global-advanced-authentication-market-2016-2020Contact Info:Name: Sameer JoshiEmail: firstname.lastname@example.orgOrganization: ReportsWebAddress: Pune, India.Phone: +1-646-491-9876Source: http://marketersmedia.com/advanced-authentication-market-by-size-share-overview-swot-analysis-and-forecast-to-2020/148927Release ID: 148927
SecurEnvoy | Date: 2014-07-02
Time-based authentication apparatus deploys a seed record to user equipment such as a mobile telephone pre-equipped with an app. When a user initiates login access to a protected product or service, using a computing device, they run the app on their mobile equipment which delivers an output such as a QR code (or other local communication such as NFC) containing two time-based codes. The login process on the computing device accepts the output and sends the time-based codes to the authentication apparatus, either together or the second code on request. The authentication apparatus now locates the codes and automatically resynchronises to any time zone across the world plus 1 hour of clock drift (+/- 13 hours UTC).
SecurEnvoy | Date: 2011-08-10
Multi-factor authentication apparatus pre-loads a first factor, for example a passcode, to user equipment such as a mobile telephone. The user subsequently initiates access to a protected product or service, triggering the apparatus to run a multi-factor authentication process, via an access device such as a computer connected to the Internet. The user enters the pre-loaded first factor, together with another factor such as a UserID and PIN. The pre-loading avoids vulnerability to communications problems at the time the user initiates access. Pre-loading is done every time an access session terminates for the user, either successful or failed and a user profile data store is used to manage passcodes in a manner that allows incorrectly entered first factors to be retried when delivery to user equipment is not possible.
News Article | December 9, 2014
The password, once highly acclaimed as a security precaution, can no longer provide what it once promised. As technology constantly evolves, cyber-criminals also refine their tactics. Simple password protection is facing increasingly sophisticated threats, and can be rapidly bypassed, especially if users continue to use simple passwords in order to make them easy to remember. Users often have trouble with basic password-protected access, for example because they can no longer remember the relevant password or even the email address that was registered. It is therefore not possible to send a new password, which results in “non-active members”. Or users simply have to remember too many passwords, which results in the next danger arising: the use of passwords that are too simple. As highlighted in various studies, users often use “password”, “123456” or other such sequences of characters that are easy to crack. Hacked in less than ten seconds Brute-force attacks can, for example, crack a 6-digit password in about seven seconds. Many users also make the cyber-gangsters’ work even easier as they use the same password for multiple accounts, or never change it. But there is an easy way to make user access more secure without needing to banish the password completely. Double protection without the need for a token The use of a combination of factors enables more secure user identification, as is the case with two-factor authentication. This permits access only after the entry of a combination of two factors. In the case of the authentication technology provided by SecurEnvoy, the first factor is something that the user knows (e.g. username and password for access to the company’s computer) and the second factor is something that the user possesses. The SecurEnvoy solutions are especially convenient as they use a tokenless approach, i.e. mobile phones are used for this second factor rather than dedicated tokens. The user receives a passcode via SMS, email, soft token app or in the form of a QR code, and this can then be entered together with the user’s login details to prove the user’s identity. Network access is thus afforded a dual layer of protection.
News Article | November 21, 2014
Many companies use Microsoft Remote Desktop Web (RD Web) in order to manage their access to server resources. Two-factor authentication (2FA) is recommended to secure this access. This usually consists of the conventional username and password components plus an additional passcode component. However, there has recently been an increase in cases of third parties obtaining access to web applications in RD Web environments without needing to enter the additional passcode. How have the third parties been able to get past the usually highly secure 2FA and how should RD Web users protect themselves in the future? Let’s take a look at everyday business activities and how an RD Web login process normally runs. First, a user must authenticate themselves via 2FA in a Microsoft RD Web interface in order to access a website. Then there is a second authentication normally via Single Sign On (SSO) to RD Gateway which is the main VPN that all remote data sent from the RDP client uses. Next something known as an RD Connection Broker comes into play and this connects the user to a backend RD Session Host. Application access is then enabled. However, the interaction between RD Web and traditional 2FA servers has resulted in the appearance of major vulnerabilities. The reason for this is the lack of a connection between the 2FA server and the Microsoft RD Gateway server. Users can easily create a remote desktop protocol (RDP) file or just request full desktop access directly to the RD Gateway without needing to visit the RD Web first. This allows third parties to bypass the 2FA check required at the RD website and access the gateway directly. To login, one simply has to enter a username and a password here. As the RD Gateway does not have any 2FA integration, this constitutes a major security risk for companies and organisations. Where the Microsoft protection stops In order to prevent such bypassing of 2FA, companies are recommended to install a Windows Logon Agent (2FA) on each RD Session Host. But this theoretically beneficial security step actually creates another big problem: Each backend RD Session Host will require a separate 2FA authentication so each time a user reconnects or starts a different application the RD Connection Broker will probably select a different Session Host. In other words, users would be forced to authenticate themselves countless times via 2FA in their daily work. This would lead not only to frustration but also a reduction in workflow and productivity. It is also a poor security design as it’s like trying to lock all internal doors after leaving your front door open! SecurEnvoy is the first 2FA company to add true RD Gateway integration. They are the only provider of a solution that restores the security of 2FA and overcomes the aforementioned problems with Microsoft RD Gateway. When companies install a SecurEnvoy solution in the RD Web and on the RD Gateway, all communication through both the RD Web and the RD Gateway is routed and simultaneously checked by the SecurEnvoy agent. This is possible because the SecurEnvoy solution is directly connected to the RD Gateway and Active Directory server and the security mechanisms can now be applied to the whole system. This allows every user to again make unrestricted use of 2FA for all remote desktop web sessions. The system is 100% secure and can never be bypassed using just a conventional login process (username and password).
News Article | November 19, 2014
According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), there are now as many mobile phones as people in the world: about seven billion. Such devices have affected our communication behaviour and accessibility significantly over the past decades. It all started with text messaging, which was soon followed by video calling, and now we have web-based instant messengers and countless other apps. And mobile phones and smartphones can be enormously helpful with regard to security in companies, authorities and organisations, as they enable tokenless two-factor authentication. More details about this are provided in a free white paper published by the authentication expert SecurEnvoy, which is available here for download. Employees who want to access an internal network must usually first prove their identity. They generally do this by entering a username and a password. SecurEnvoy adds a further layer of security to this process by requesting the entry of a passcode in addition to the user details. The required passcode is sent to users in a tokenless procedure; in other words, users do not need an additional, dedicated token such as a USB stick, but instead make use of their mobile devices, i.e. mobile phones, smartphones, tablets or laptops. Users receive the numeric passcode via SMS, email or in a soft token app. The passcode is then entered on the login page together with the personal user access details, thus providing unequivocal confirmation of the user’s identity. The required passcode can also be provided via a landline call or via a QR code. The free white paper also explains how SecurEnvoy solutions make it impossible to distribute a user identity across multiple devices and how the use of split seed records protects against hacking and spyware. The functionality of the SecurAccess two-factor authentication solution is demonstrated in a video on the SecurEnvoy YouTube channel.
News Article | November 17, 2014
The Twitter microblogging service recently declared war on passwords. Rather than having to remember dozens of different passwords, users can now authenticate themselves via the “Digits” service (a social sign-in) when using an app. They have to supply their mobile phone numbers for this purpose. In order to log into Twitter or other sites, users receive a code via SMS, which is then entered as proof of identity and allows access. Sounds convenient – but what happens if mobile phone reception is disrupted or not available? Logging in would be impossible in such cases, as the second factor – the code – would not be available and access would therefore be denied. Users may well become disgruntled if, due to the lack of a signal or a delay in SMS transmission, they receive codes late or not at all. However, this shift away from protection using solely passwords to combined authentication methods at least shows that awareness of the need for better security is increasing. More and more online services are giving their users the opportunity to confirm their identities by means of two-factor authentication, thus reducing the risk of attacks by hackers. Using the preload approach to circumvent delays SecurEnvoy provides tokenless two-factor authentication solutions that are perfect for use in businesses or government agencies. The solutions work in a similar way to Digits, but are more reliable. Instead of a dedicated token, users just need a mobile device such as a smartphone in order to receive the passcode via SMS, which is then entered together with personal login details. Extra reliability is provided by SecurEnvoy in the form of preloaded codes, which means that when a code is used, it automatically expires and is immediately replaced by a new one. There is thus no risk of having to endure a period of waiting when it is time for the next login. This way costumers can enjoy the benefits of the patented preloading technology developed by SecurEnvoy – by the way also the inventor of SMS authentication, first done 15 years ago.
News Article | January 10, 2013
SecurEnvoy is to provide its tokenless authentication technology to the PasswordBank identity management offering under a partnership between the two companies. It said it will enable users to access cloud solutions through PasswordBank's single-sign-on platform, using SMS messages for two-factor authentication. The process provides business grade security without requiring users to carry a physical token. Under two-factor authentication, an individual can prove their identity by providing two out of three factors: something they know, such as a username, password or PIN; something they have, such as a credit card or token; or a biometric such as a fingerprint. Authentication tokens generate a one time passcode which can be entered as part of a two-factor authentication process. They can be generated by apps on a smartphone or sent via SMS. Steve Watts, sales director of SecurEnvoy, said: "Knowing how important security is, many companies implement two-factor authentication to ensure that they always know who is accessing their systems at any time. But forcing users to carry tokens around with them (and not letting them log in if they don't have them) defeats the point. "By combining the freedom of using SMS messages as the second factor, with the flexibility of the cloud, suddenly workers really do have the freedom they need."
News Article | April 25, 2013
SecurEnvoy has upgraded its SMS-based system for two-factor authentication with the ability for users to receive one-time passwords via a landline telephone call and enter them using the telephone keys. The goal for the addition of passwords via a landline telephone call in version 7 of SecurEnvoy's platform is to increase reliability. It is particularly suitable for people who do not always have an Internet or mobile telephone connection, the company said in a blog post. In addition to passwords sent in real-time, SecurEnvoy can also pre-load passwords and issue reusable ones. The preloading means that a new password is sent after each time the user authenticates. The new code overwrites the old message. This option is a good fit for users with an intermittent connection or those who experience delays when receiving text messages. For users that are out of range for multiple days, three one-time passwords can be sent in one text. "One of our customers, Save the Children, go to some very remote places, and they were one of the first to give us feedback on this," said Steve Watts, sales director at SecurEnvoy. Lost mobile phones are another potential hazard. But Watts feels that mobile phones are safer in this regard than separate hardware tokens. "Within about three to four minutes, if your phone hasn't rung, vibrated or been looked at, you are going to panic, and you check where it is. If you lose your hardware token, it may take be a day, could be a week or even a month depending on how regularly you use it before you notice its gone," Watts said. The concept of using text messages as a way to improve security has been around for many years. While European companies were quicker to embrace the technology, the adoption in the US is now growing massively, according to Watts. Vendors like Apple and Google backing two-factor authentication for their on-line services has increased acceptance, he said. "Anybody in our industry understands that you can't have Office applications with data behind it sitting in the public domain without good security," Watts said. The need for more secure alternatives to passwords were highlighted this week as AP's Twitter account was hacked and used to send out a fake message about an attack on the White House that had left President Barack Obama injured. "It is always easy after the event to say if you had done this it wouldn't have happened. But it shows that two-factor authentication has to be embraced, using whatever form you feel is right," Watts said.