Sorensen S.V.,United Biosource Corporation |
Goh J.W.,United Biosource Corporation |
Pan F.,United Biosource Corporation |
Chen C.,Pfizer |
And 6 more authors.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care | Year: 2012
Objectives: This study aims to estimate the annual U.S. societal costs associated with treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients using an incidence-based cost-of-illness (COI) framework. Methods: An incidence-based COI model was constructed in which MBC patients were simulated from diagnosis through active treatment, palliative care, and death over 5 years. Key model parameters included: annual incidence of breast cancer in the metastatic stage, utilization of cancer therapies and other medical care resources, treatment-related adverse events, unit costs, work days missed by patient and caregiver, and wage rates. Overall survival was based on SEER data and costs were assigned to living patients monthly, according to their disease management phase. The outcomes measures were total discounted societal costs, cost/year, and cost/patient-year. Results: The annual incidence of MBC in the United States in 2007 was estimated to be 49,674 patients (de novo and progressed from earlier stages). The total discounted cost to society attributable to MBC was $12.2 billion for the incident cohort, or $98,571 per patient-year. The 5-year direct medical cost of this incident cohort was $9.3 billion, or $75,415 per patient-year. Treatment-related costs (active treatment, toxicity management, and medical follow-up) contributed 44 percent of MBC expenditure, followed by palliative/best supportive care costs (31 percent). Lost productivity accounted for approximately 21 percent of the total cost ($2.6 billion over 5 years or $21,153 per patient-year). Conclusions: The societal burden of MBC in the United States is substantial. Earlier detection and effective treatment could lead to a significant decrease in costs while improving overall disease prognosis. © 2012 Cambridge University Press.
Lynch T.J.,Smilow Cancer Hospital |
Spigel D.R.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC |
Brahmer J.,Johns Hopkins Hospital |
Fischbach N.,Oncology Assoc. of Bridgeport |
And 10 more authors.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | Year: 2014
INTRODUCTION: Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. ARIES (Avastin Regimens: Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety), a prospective observational cohort study, evaluated outcomes in a large, community-based population of patients with first-line NSCLC. METHODS: From 2006 to 2009, ARIES enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were eligible for bevacizumab, excluding those with predominantly squamous histology. Patients were required to provide informed consent and to have initiated bevacizumab with chemotherapy within 4 months before enrollment. There were no protocol-defined treatments or assessments. The dosing of bevacizumab and chemotherapy, and the choice of chemotherapy regimen, was at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS: ARIES enrolled 1967 patients with first-line NSCLC. At study closure, median follow-up was 12.5 months (range, 0.2-65.5). Median age was 65 years (range, 31-93), and 252 patients (12.8%) identified as never smokers. Median progression-free survival was 6.6 months (95% confidence interval, 6.3-6.9), and median overall survival was 13.0 months (95% confidence interval, 12.2-13.8) with first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Incidences of bevacizumab-associated adverse events (19.7% overall) were consistent with those in randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab in NSCLC. CONCLUSION: Results from ARIES demonstrate similar outcomes to randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab when added to standard chemotherapy in a real-world patient population with advanced NSCLC. Copyright © 2014 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.
HERMIONE: a randomized Phase 2 trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy of physicians choice plus trastuzumab in patients with previously treated, anthracycline-naïve, HER2-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer
PubMed | University of Barcelona, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Indiana University, Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC and 4 more.
Type: | Journal: BMC cancer | Year: 2016
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is a particularly aggressive form of the disease, and ultimately progresses in patients with metastases on standard therapies. Anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, are an effective treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, particularly when administered in combination with trastuzumab - however, doxorubicin-related cardiotoxicity has limited its use. Many patients are therefore never treated with anthracyclines, even upon disease progression, despite the potential for benefit. MM-302 is a novel, HER2-targeted antibody-liposomal doxorubicin conjugate that specifically targets HER2-overexpressing cells. Preclinical and Phase 1 data suggest that MM-302, as a monotherapy or in combination with trastuzumab, could be effective for managing previously treated, anthracycline-nave, HER2-positive breast cancer, without the cardiotoxicity observed with free doxorubicin formulations.HERMIONE is an open-label, multicenter, randomized (1:1) Phase 2 trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy of physicians choice (gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine) plus trastuzumab planned to enroll 250 anthracycline-nave patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Key inclusion criteria are: previous treatment with trastuzumab (with or without pertuzumab) in any setting; refractory or intolerant to pertuzumab (refractory to pertuzumab defined as progression in the locally advanced or metastatic setting, or disease recurrence during or within 12months of completing pertuzumab-containing neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy); and disease progression on, or intolerant to, ado-trastuzumab emtansine for locally advanced or metastatic disease. The trial is currently being conducted at sites in the USA, Canada, and Western Europe. Treatment will be administered in 21-day cycles, and will be continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is independently assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor response will be assessed every 6weeks, and defined according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), OS rates at 6months and 1year, objective response rates, safety and tolerability, quality of life, and the pharmacokinetic profile of MM-302 plus trastuzumab.The HERMIONE study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of MM-302 plus trastuzumab in patients with refractory HER2-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer for whom there are no standard of care therapies with a proven survival advantage.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02213744 . Registration date: 06AUG2014.
Novello S.,University of Turin |
Scagliotti G.V.,University of Turin |
Sydorenko O.,Zaporizhzhya State Medical University |
Vynnychenko I.,Sumy State University |
And 6 more authors.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | Year: 2014
Introduction: The phase 3 MONET1 study evaluated motesanib (a small-molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors) plus carboplatin/paclitaxel versus placebo plus carboplatin/ paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment and enrollment of patients with squamous histology were permanently discontinued following higher early mortality and gross hemoptysis in those with squamous NSCLC who received motesanib. Enrollment of patients with nonsquamous histology was temporarily halted, but resumed following a protocol amendment (Scagliotti et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2829-2836). Herein, we report data from the squamous cohort. Methods: Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent squamous NSCLC (without prior systemic therapy for advanced disease) received up to six 3-week cycles of chemotherapy (carboplatin, area under the curve 6 mg/L•min/paclitaxel, 200 mg2) and were randomized 1:1 to receive motesanib 125 mg (Arm A) or placebo (Arm B) once daily. The primary end point was overall survival. Results: Three-hundred and sixty patients with squamous NSCLC were randomized (Arm A, n = 182; Arm B, n = 178) between July 2007 and November 2008. Twenty-three patients (13%) in Arm A and 10 (6%) in Arm B had fatal adverse events within the first 60 days of treatment. Among these, six patients in Arm A, but none in Arm B, had fatal bleeding events. At final analysis, serious adverse events had occurred in 47% of patients in Arm A and 29% of patients in Arm B. Median overall survival was similar in Arms A and B (11.1 versus 10.7 months). Conclusions: Motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel had unacceptable toxicity compared with carboplatin/paclitaxel alone in patients with advanced squamous NSCLC. Copyright © 2014 by the International Association for the Study of Lung.
Hoh C.K.,University of California at San Diego |
Burris H.A.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC |
Bendell J.C.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC |
Tarazi J.,Pfizer |
And 4 more authors.
British Journal of Cancer | Year: 2014
Background:We evaluated week-on/week-off axitinib dosing plus chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal tumours, including tumour thymidine uptake by fluorine-18 3′-deoxy-3′-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography (18 FLT-PET).Methods:During a lead-in period, patients received twice daily (b.i.d.) axitinib 7 mg (n=3) or 10 mg (n=18) for 7 days followed by a 7-day dosing interruption; serial 18 FLT-PET scans were performed before day 1 and on days 7, 10, and 14. Axitinib plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX was then administered in 2-week cycles; axitinib was interrupted on day 10 of each cycle for 7 days.Results:The maximum tolerated dose of axitinib was 10 mg b.i.d., in a week-on/week-off schedule, combined with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX. Common all-causality grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (38%), hypertension (33%), and fatigue (29%). Of 21 patients, 2 (10%) had a partial response and 12 (57%) had stable disease. Following 7 days of continuous axitinib dosing, tumour 18 FLT uptake decreased -49% from baseline and recovered to -28% and -17% from baseline, respectively, after 3 and 7 days of axitinib interruption.Conclusion:Axitinib administered in a week-on/week-off schedule combined with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX is supported by 18 FLT-PET data and was well tolerated in patients with gastrointestinal tumours. © 2014 Cancer Research UK.
Greco F.A.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC |
Spigel D.R.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC |
Hainsworth J.D.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | Year: 2013
BackgroundMolecular tumor profiling (MTP) is a potentially powerful diagnostic tool for identifying the tissue of origin in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). However, validation of the accuracy and clinical value of MTP has been difficult because the anatomic primary site in most patients is never identified.MethodsFrom March 2008 through January 2010, clinicopathologic data from 171 CUP patients who had MTP (CancerTYPE ID; bioTheranostics, Inc, San Diego, CA) performed on archived material were evaluated. The accuracy of MTP diagnoses was evaluated by comparison with 1) latent primary tumor sites found months/years later; 2) initial single diagnoses by immunohistochemistry (IHC); and 3) additional directed IHC and/or clinicopathologic findings evaluated after MTP diagnoses.ResultsA single MTP diagnosis was made in 144 of 149 patients with adequate tumor specimens. Eighteen of 24 patients with latent primaries discovered months to years later had correct diagnoses by MTP (75%), and these diagnoses compared favorably with IHC. Single IHC diagnoses matched MTP diagnoses in 40 of 52 patients (77%). IHC predictions of 2 or more possible primaries compared poorly with MTP diagnoses. However, additional targeted IHC and clinical/histologic evaluation supported the MTP diagnosis in 26 of 35 patients (74%). Clinical features were usually consistent with MTP diagnoses (70%).ConclusionsThe diagnostic accuracy of this MTP assay was supported by a high level of agreement with identified latent primaries (75%), single IHC diagnoses (77%), and additional directed IHC and/or clinical/histologic findings (74%) prompted by the MTP diagnoses. MTP complements standard pathologic evaluation in determining the tissue of origin in patients with CUP, particularly when IHC is inconclusive. © 2013 The Author.
Shih K.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC |
Arkenau H.-T.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC |
Infante J.R.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC
Drugs | Year: 2014
Immune responses are tightly regulated via signaling through numerous co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules. Exploitation of these immune checkpoint pathways is one of the mechanisms by which tumors evade and/or escape the immune system. A growing understanding of the biology of immune checkpoints and tumor immunology has led to the development of monoclonal antibodies designed to target co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules in order to re-engage the immune system and restore antitumor immune responses. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies were among the first to be tested in the clinic, and ipilimumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for an anticancer indication. Agents targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway, either PD-1 or one of its ligands, programmed death ligand 1, are in active clinical development for numerous cancers, including advanced melanoma and lung cancer. Understanding the different mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and response patterns associated with inhibition of the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways may improve patient management as these therapies are moved in to the clinical practice setting and may also provide a rationale for combination therapy with different inhibitors. Additional immune checkpoint molecules with therapeutic potential, including lymphocyte activation gene-3 and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related gene, also have inhibitors in early stages of clinical development. Clinical responses and safety data reported to date on immune checkpoint inhibitors suggest these agents may have the potential to markedly improve outcomes for patients with cancer. © 2014 The Author(s).
Spigel D.R.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC |
Socinski M.A.,University of Pittsburgh
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | Year: 2013
INTRODUCTION: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy that although initially sensitive to chemo-and radiation therapy, inevitably relapses resulting in poor survival. Increasing evidence suggests that immune responses against SCLC cells make immunotherapy a viable therapeutic approach. Furthermore, preclinical data have shown that certain chemotherapeutic regimens may augment the immunotherapeutic response in SCLC. This review discusses current evidence supporting immunotherapy for SCLC, progress made, and ongoing clinical trials. METHODS: We searched PubMed and abstracts presented at recent oncology congresses for publications on the clinical benefit of immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade for treatment of SCLC. RESULTS: Preliminary data from ongoing clinical trials in SCLC have shown that some antiangiogenic agents, vaccines, and immunomodulators, including interferon-α and immune checkpoint blockers (i.e., anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 [CTLA-4] antibodies) may be efficacious as single agents and in combination with standard-of-care regimens. Notably, in a phase II trial, ipilimumab-a fully human anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody recently approved for treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma-demonstrated encouraging results when used as part of a chemoimmunotherapeutic regimen in patients with SCLC. Ipilimumab is undergoing further investigation in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment options for SCLC are limited and prognosis poor, emphasizing the need for novel treatments. Although current strategies successfully induce a response, the response is not durable. Evidence of an immune response in SCLC and a better understanding of the immunosuppressive tumor environment support the combinatorial use of immunomodulators, such as ipilimumab, with traditional chemotherapy regimens to improve patient outcomes and potentially sustain the effect from chemotherapeutic induction. Copyright © 2013 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.
PubMed | Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC
Type: | Journal: Drugs - real world outcomes | Year: 2016
Molecular cancer classifier assays are being used with increasing frequency to predict tissue of origin and direct site-specific therapy for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP).We postulated some CUP patients predicted to have non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by molecular cancer classifier assay may have anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged tumors, and benefit from treatment with ALK inhibitors.We retrospectively reviewed CUP patients who had the 92-gene molecular cancer classifier assay (CancerTYPE ID; bioTheranostics, Inc.) performed on tumor biopsies to identify patients predicted to have NSCLC. Beginning in 2011, we have tested these patients for ALK rearrangements and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations, based on the proven therapeutic value of these targets in NSCLC. We identified CUP patients with predicted NSCLC who were subsequently found to have ALK rearrangements.NSCLC was predicted by the molecular cancer classifier assay in 37 of 310 CUP patients. Twenty-one of these patients were tested for ALK rearrangements, and four had an EML4-ALK fusion gene detected. The diagnosis of lung cancer was strongly suggested in only one patient prior to molecular testing. One patient received ALK inhibitor treatment and has had prolonged benefit.We report on patients with lung adenocarcinoma and ALK rearrangements originally diagnosed as CUP who were identified using a molecular cancer classifier assay. Although ALK inhibitors treatment experience is limited, this newly identifiable group of lung cancer patients should be considered for therapy according to guidelines for stage IV ALK-positive NSCLC.
PubMed | Asia Pacific MSD R&D China Co., Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Palacky University, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc. and 2 more.
Type: Clinical Trial, Phase II | Journal: Clinical breast cancer | Year: 2015
Although trastuzumab-containing therapies prolong survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), most tumors develop trastuzumab resistance, potentially mediated by aberrant phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling. Ridaforolimus (a mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitor) may overcome trastuzumab resistance by inhibiting PI3K signaling.A single-arm, phase IIb trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ridaforolimus-trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2(+)) trastuzumab-refractory MBC (NCT00736970). Ridaforolimus was administered orally (40 mg daily) for 5 d/wk plus weekly trastuzumab. The primary end point was objective response (OR).Thirty-four patients were enrolled (91% had received 1 or 2 previous trastuzumab-based therapies, whereas 9% had received 3 previous therapies). The most common reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (62%) and adverse events (AEs; 24%). Three patients died; 1 because of bowel perforation, which was possibly ridaforolimus related. Partial response was observed in 5 patients (15%). Median duration of response was 19.1 weeks (range, 15.9-80.1 weeks). Fourteen patients (41%) achieved stable disease (SD); 7 patients (21%) maintained SD for 24 weeks. The clinical benefit response (CBR) rate was 34.3%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.4 months (range, 0-20.3 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-7.4) and 17.7 months (range, 0-25.9 months; 95% CI, 8.8-20.8), respectively. PFS rate at 6 months was 37%. The most common treatment-related AEs were stomatitis (59%), diarrhea (27%), and rash (27%).Ridaforolimus-trastuzumab was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in trastuzumab-resistant HER2(+) MBC.