Time filter

Source Type

Brejo da Madre de Deus, Brazil

Velloso M.S.S.,Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei | Otoni A.,Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei | de Paula Sabino A.,Federal University of Minas Gerais | de Castro W.V.,Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei | And 3 more authors.
Clinica Chimica Acta | Year: 2014

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a kidney replacement therapy for end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Despite being a lifesaving treatment, the rate of mortality in patients under PD is elevated, mainly due to the chronic peritoneal dysfunction which is characterized by inflammation, peritoneal fibrosis and neoangiogenesis. The inflammatory process is trigged and modulated by the type of the peritoneal dialysis solutions (PDSs) used during PD. Currently, different PDSs are commercially available: (i) the conventional solutions; (ii) solutions of neutral pH containing low concentration of glucose degradation products (GDPs); (iii) solutions with icodextrin; and (iv) solutions containing taurine. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the different types of peritoneal dialysis solutions used during PD and their relationship with systemic and intraperitoneal inflammation. Some studies suggested that solutions of neutral pH containing low concentration of GDPs, icodextrin and taurine have better biocompatibility and lower influence on the inflammatory process compared to the conventional one. On the other hand, the studies, in general, were performed with a small population and for a short period of time. Therefore, further well-designed and -controlled clinical trials with larger number of individuals are required in order to better understand the role of different peritoneal dialysis solution types in the development of inflammation in patients with chronic peritoneal dialysis.Accordingly, studies that are more well-designed, well-controlled and with a larger number of patients are needed to explain and define the role of different types of PDS in the inflammation development in patients with chronic peritoneal dialysis. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. Source

De Lima S.M.A.,Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei | Otoni A.,Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei | Sabino A.D.P.,Federal University of Minas Gerais | Dusse L.M.S.,Federal University of Minas Gerais | And 4 more authors.
Clinica Chimica Acta | Year: 2013

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a form of renal replacement therapy used in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). It is based on using the peritoneum as a semipermeable membrane through which ultrafiltration (UF) and diffusion occur. Despite several benefits, PD has long-term complications, including inflammation, neoangiogenesis and fibrosis. Several inflammatory molecules can be found in the dialysate of PD patients including: interleukins (IL), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Angiogenesis results in increased effective surface area exchange. Consequently, the glucose-driven osmotic pressure of the peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF) is significantly reduced leading to UF failure (UFF). Several factors are implicated in the development of peritoneal fibrosis (PF) in PD patients. The most important factor is the conventional bio-incompatible PD solution, which contains high concentration of glucose and glucose degradation products (GDP). Although there are several studies elucidating the mechanisms leading to UFF in PD patients, more studies needed to be developed in this area and more research is required to find mechanisms to delay or to minimize the occurrence of many deleterious changes in peritoneal membrane (PM) during PD. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. Source

Discover hidden collaborations