Research Center Forestal Lourizan

Pontevedra, Spain

Research Center Forestal Lourizan

Pontevedra, Spain

Time filter

Source Type

Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Fonturbel T.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
Journal of Environmental Management | Year: 2012

The immediate effects of prescribed burning, shrub clearing and shrub mastication on runoff, infiltration and erosion were evaluated in two contrasting shrubland areas in northern Spain. Rainfall simulations (67 mm h -1 for 30 min) were conducted immediately after fuel reduction treatments in each runoff plot. Compared to shrub mastication and shrub clearing, prescribed burning generated the lowest infiltration rate and highest runoff and erosion rates at both study sites. However, sediment yields measured immediately after treatments were low in all cases, from 0.31 to 2.22 g m -2 after shrub clearing, 0.40-1.63 g m -2 after shrub mastication and 2.30-8.11 g m -2 after prescribed burning. Slope, type of fuel reduction treatment and the depth and cover of the soil organic layer remaining after treatment were the most important variables determining runoff and erosion during the first rainfall event following treatment. In the rainfall simulation plots subjected to prescribed burning, the maximum temperatures reached at the organic layer/mineral soil interface during burning also had a significant effect on soil loss. The findings show that good fuel management prescriptions make fire hazard reduction and soil conservation compatible in cases where the remaining soil cover is about 70%. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.


Jimenez E.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Fonturbel T.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
Forestry | Year: 2011

The mid-term effects on carbon sequestration of two consecutive pre-commercial thinnings with different intensities were analysed in a heavily stocked Pinus pinaster Ait. stand in northwestern Spain. Thinning was carried out 5 and 8 years after seedling establishment. Intense thinning reduced the initial sapling density by 92 per cent after the first treatment and by 87 per cent after the second; moderate thinning reduced the density by 82 per cent after the first treatment and by 84 per cent after the second. The effect on foliar efficiency of the first thinning was transient, but was prolonged by the second thinning. Live carbon biomass stock (in saplings and understorey) decreased after thinning, especially after the most intense thinning. However, when residues were taken into account, the carbon biomass decreased by only 18 per cent in the intensely thinned plots, and by 2 per cent in the moderately thinned plots, relative to the untreated plots, by the end of the study period. Very early thinning of these heavily stocked young stands was found to have a reduced mid-term effect on carbon sequestration per land area, when carbon stock from understorey and residues were considered. © Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2010. All rights reserved.


Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Jimenez E.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Fonturbel T.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
International Journal of Wildland Fire | Year: 2011

This study assessed the effectiveness of different methods of reducing soil erosion after a severe wildfire in Galicia (NW Spain). The treatments compared were: straw mulch (2.5Mg ha-1), wood-chip mulch (4Mg ha -1), cut-shrub barriers and control. Straw mulch provided an initial ground cover of 80% and the wood chips only 45%. Sediment yields were measured by means of sediment fences in 500-m2 bordered plots. During the first year after wildfire, mean precipitation was 1520mm. The mean sediment yield in the control plots was 35Mg ha-1. During this period, only straw mulch application significantly reduced soil erosion relative to controls (66%). The mean sediment yields in the wood-chip mulch and erosion barrier treatments, 33 and 30Mg ha-1 respectively, were similar to rates in the untreated plots (35Mg ha-1). Soil erosion decreased sharply during the second year after wildfire when mean precipitation was 1194mm. Vegetation regrowth was very fast and treatments had no significant effect on the rate of recovery of vegetation cover, which was ∼80% at the end of the study. The results obtained showed that ground cover was a key factor in determining post-fire soil loss. Stabilisation treatments such as wood-chip mulch and erosion barriers were not effective in reducing soil loss relative to the untreated control. © IAWF 2011.


Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
Ecological Engineering | Year: 2014

Slope stabilization treatments like mulching are frequently used to reduce runoff and erosion following high severity wildfires, but they may also affect native vegetation recovery or facilitate exotic species invasion. However, the effectiveness of many treatment options has not been well established, in particular, the use of wood-based mulches.In this study we assessed the efficacy of different methods of reducing soil erosion and the effects on vegetation recovery after a severe wildfire in Galicia (NW Spain). We compared the following treatments: straw mulch (2.0Mgha-1), bark strands mulch (3.5Mgha-1) and control (untreated). The straw mulch provided an initial ground cover of 70% and the bark strands mulch, 57%.During the first year after wildfire the mean sediment yield in the control plots was 5.4Mgha-1. In this period, the mean sediment yields in the treated plots were significantly lower than in the control plots (0.7Mgha-1 in the bark strands mulched plots and 0.5Mgha-1 in the straw-mulched plots). The bark strands mulch decayed very rapidly, so that six months after its application the mean cover had decreased to about 27%. Straw mulch persisted longer, and the mean cover was more than 40% at the end of the first year after fire.Soil erosion decreased sharply during the second year after wildfire with low and similar erosion yields in all cases.Straw mulching favoured vegetation cover recovery. Mulching did not have a significant effect on seedling emergence. Vegetation regrowth was very rapid and the total vegetation cover was about 70% at the end of the study.Mulching did not affect species composition, and there was also no evidence of the presence of any exotic species.The results indicate the feasibility of mulching with straw to reduce soil erosion after fire. The efficacy of bark strands mulch in controlling soil erosion losses during the first year after fire was probably due to the fact that most rainfall occurred when the cover provided by the mulch was maximal (i.e. before it decayed). This may indicate a limitation for soil protection the first year after fire when the erosion risk is highest. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.


Vega J.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Jimenez E.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega D.,University of Vigo | Ortiz L.,University of Vigo | Perez J.R.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
Forest Ecology and Management | Year: 2011

Maritime pine (. Pinus pinaster Ait.) is the tree species most affected by wildfire in the Iberian Peninsula. Prediction of the probability of fire-injured tree mortality is critical for management of burned areas, evaluation of the ecological and economic impact of wildfire and prescribed fire planning and application. Pine bark beetles (Scolytidae) frequently attack burned maritime pine stands and cause extensive post-fire mortality throughout the Iberian Peninsula. In the present study, maritime pine trees were monitored for three years following 14 wildfires in four ecotypes in Spain (11 fires in Galicia (Galician ecotype - NW Spain), one fire in Portillo (Meseta-Castellana ecotype - Central Spain), one fire in Rodenal (Rodenal ecotype - Central Spain), and one fire in Genalguacil (Sierra Bermeja ecotype - SW Spain)). Data on tree attributes, crown and bole injury, ground fire severity, . Ips sp. presence and tree survival were obtained by examining 3085 trees. Logistic regression models for predicting the probability of delayed maritime pine mortality were developed by use of generalized estimated equations (GEE). An ample range of response to fire damage in mortality was evident among the four ecotypes and different models were fitted for each. The most important variables for predicting tree mortality were total crown volume damaged, presence of . Ips sp. attack and cambium kill rating. The results highlight the extensive presence of . Ips sp. in burned maritime pine forests and its importance in tree mortality process, the ample range of response of . P. pinaster, in terms of post-fire mortality, as well as the need to develop site specific mortality models for the different ecotypes of this species following fire. © 2010 Elsevier B.V.


Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Fonturbel T.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
Acta Oecologica | Year: 2013

Prescribed burning is commonly used to reduce the risk of severe wildfire. However, further information about the associated environmental effects is required to help forest managers select the most appropriate treatment. To address this question, we evaluated if fire severity during spring prescribed burning significantly affects the resprouting ability of two common shrub species in shrubland under a Mediterranean climate in NW Spain. Fire behaviour and temperatures were recorded in tagged individuals of Erica australis and Pterospartum tridentatum during prescribed burning. The number and length of resprouted shoots were measured three times (6, 12 and 18 months) after the prescribed burning. The influence of a series of fire severity indicators on some plant resprouting vigour parameters was tested by canonical correlation analysis. Six months and one year after prescribed burning, soil burn severity (measured by the absolute reduction in depth of the organic soil layer, maximum temperatures in the organic soil layer and the mineral soil surface during burning and the post-fire depth of the organic soil layer) reduced the resprouting vigour of E. australis and P. tridentatum. In contrast, direct measurements of fire effects on plants (minimum branch diameter, duration of temperatures above 300 °C in the shrub crown and fireline intensity) did not affect the post-fire plant vigour.Soil burn severity during spring prescribed burning significantly affected the short-term resprouting vigour in a mixed heathland in Galicia. The lack of effects eighteen months after prescribed burning indicates the high resilience of these species and illustrates the need to conciliate fire prevention and conservation goals. © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS.


Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
Plant Ecology | Year: 2014

Fuel reduction treatments are commonly used nowadays to reduce wildfire hazard in northwestern Spain. Although prescribed fire has been widely used as a fuel reduction treatment, comparison with mechanical methods is scarce. In this study, we compared the effects of prescribed burning, clearing and mechanical shredding on shrub cover recovery, relative to untreated mature vegetation, in a heathland dominated by Erica umbellata Loefl. (L.) in Galicia (NW Spain). The fuel reduction treatments were applied in the spring of 2006, and the area was burned by an experimental fire in the spring of 2009. We evaluated shrub recovery, in comparison with an untreated control, after application of the above-mentioned fuel reduction treatments and also after an experimental fire 3 years later. Shrub cover and height remained lower than in the untreated control during the 3 years after application of the treatments, and the effects of the different treatments were not significantly different. The treatments did not affect species richness or seedling density during the 3-year interval. After the experimental fire, the only significant effect observed was an increase in grass cover in the areas treated by mechanical shredding and by prescribed fire relative to the control (untreated area); this effect lasted until the end of the study. Some consequences for management of this type of heathland are also discussed. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.


Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
Forest Ecology and Management | Year: 2016

Mulching is frequently used to reduce runoff and erosion following high-severity wildfires. In commercial forest stands, post-fire salvage logging is common practice, although it can lead to increased erosion losses in recently burned areas. Field research concerning the effects of post-fire salvage logging on sediment production is limited and the effects of clearcutting in areas previously treated by mulching are not known. In this study, 36 experimental plots were established in three experimental sites affected by crown fires that caused moderate-high soil burn severity in the summer of 2013. Immediately after the fire, bark strands mulch was applied in 18 of the plots. Salvage logging took place at the end of the first winter following fire. Post logging treatments were: mulching + salvage logging, no mulching + salvage logging and no mulching + no logging. The objectives of the study were to determine whether mulching mitigates soil erosion caused by fire and salvage logging and also to assess the possible effects of wildfire and salvage logging, with and without mulching, on vegetation recovery. During the six month period lapsed between the wildfire and salvage logging, precipitation was higher than the annual mean in the area, and the average soil loss in the untreated burned soils was 18.5 Mg ha-1. In that period, mulching significantly reduced soil loss (84%). In the 18-month period following salvage logging and in the absence of mulch, there was no increase in erosion due to logging (8.7 Mg ha-1) compared with the unlogged treatment (7.0 Mg ha-1) whereas mulching reduced significantly soil losses even after logging (2.3 Mg ha-1). Neither mulching nor salvage logging had any detrimental effects on the regeneration of natural vegetation. Our results showed that the mulching just after a fire can substantially reduce the subsequent erosion due to post-fire salvage logging without any significant adverse effects on vegetative regrowth. In addition, leaving the standing burned trees seemed not to be a feasible management option to reduce post-fire erosion and enhance vegetation recovery in those kind of stands. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.


Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Fonturbel T.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Merino A.,University of Santiago de Compostela | Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | And 2 more authors.
Plant and Soil | Year: 2013

Aims: Areas affected by wildfire comprise spatially complex mosaics of burned patches in which a wide range of burn severities coexist. Rapid diagnosis of the different levels of soil burn severity and their extents is essential for designing emergency post-fire rehabilitation treatments. The main objective of this study was to determine whether visual signs of soil burn severity levels are related to changes in soil chemical and microbial properties immediately after fire. Methods: Eight areas affected by wildfires in NW Spain were selected immediately after fire, and soil chemical and biological properties (pH, extractable Ca, K, Mg and P, SOC, total N, δ13C, basal soil respiration, Cmic, phosphatase activity, extractable NH4 + and NO3 -, ammonification and nitrification rates and potential N mineralization) were analysed in relation to five levels of soil burn severity (0: Unburned; 1: Oa layer partially or totally intact; 2: Oa layer totally charred; 3: Bare soil and soil structure unaffected; 4: Bare soil and soil structure affected; 5: Bare soil and surface soil structure and colour altered). Results: The five visually assessed levels of soil burn severity adequately reflected changes in SOC, pH, and phosphatase activity, which varied gradually with increasing soil burn severity. However, alterations in certain indicators related to the soil organic quality (C/N, Cmic/SOC, qCO2, δ13C) were only detected in the most severely burned areas. Discriminant analysis revealed that the best combination of variables was acid phosphatase activity, SOC and pH, which correctly classified between 64 and 76 % of samples, depending on the levels of soil burn severity considered. Conclusions: The results showed that the proposed soil burn severity categories may be useful for indicating the degree of degradation of important soil chemical and microbiological properties in sites similar to the study area. This, in combination with other factors, will allow prioritization of areas for rehabilitation. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.


Fernandez C.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan | Vega J.A.,Research Center Forestal Lourizan
Ecological Engineering | Year: 2016

Erosion barriers have traditionally been used in Europe by land managers to reduce runoff and erosion after high severity wildfires. However, field research investigating the effectiveness of this treatment is scarce in Europe. Previous research in the US and Europe has demonstrated that application of straw mulch at a rate of 2Mgha-1 effectively reduced post-fire sediment yields. For logistic and economic reasons, it would be useful to know whether a small reduction (25%) in the amount of straw mulch applied would significantly reduce the effectiveness of the treatment. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of a low rate of straw mulching (1.5Mgha-1) and of erosion barriers in reducing soil erosion during the first three years after a wildfire in Galicia (NW Spain). Twelve experimental plots (80m2) were established along a hillslope burned at high severity. During the three years of study, the accumulated soil loss in the untreated burned soils was 77.9Mgha-1. Mulching and erosion barriers both reduced soil loss (by respectively 38% and 26%). In all cases, soil erosion losses were high during the first two years after fire, which is an unusual response in the area. Maximum concentrated precipitation (rainfall >20mm accumulated in two consecutive days) and the Wischmeier's rainfall erosivity factor were the variables most strongly associated with soil loss during the study period. Although erosion barriers and mulch cover both reduced soil loss, relative to the untreated control, the effectiveness of these measures was low after the high-severity wildfire in an area affected by high rainfall. The lack of effect of vegetation cover on soil loss highlights the need for emergency measures to be implemented immediately after fire to protect the soil from erosion. © 2015 Elsevier B.V..

Loading Research Center Forestal Lourizan collaborators
Loading Research Center Forestal Lourizan collaborators