Time filter

Source Type

Jat M.L.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center | Jat M.L.,Project Directorate for Cropping Systems Research | Gathala M.K.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center | Saharawat Y.S.,Indian Agricultural Research Institute | And 4 more authors.
Field Crops Research | Year: 2013

Excessive pumping of groundwater over the years to meet the high water requirement of flooded rice crop and intensive tillage have threatened the sustainability of irrigated rice-wheat system (RWS) in the Indo-Gangetic plains (IGP) of South Asia. Replacement of rice with less water requiring crops such as maize in the RWS and identification of effective strategies for alternate tillage systems will promote sustainable cropping systems in the IGP. To this effect a 3-year field experiment was established with annual maize-wheat rotation in the north-western IGP of India to evaluate the effect of 3 tillage systems (conventional flat, CTF; no-till flat, NTF; permanent raised beds, NTB) on crop production, water use efficiency, economic profitability and soil physical quality. Grain yield of maize was highest (8.2-73.4%) under NTB followed by NTF and CTF across the years. Wheat yield was significantly higher under NTF during the 1st year while tillage practices had non-significant effect in the succeeding two years. On average, maize planted on NTB recorded about 11% lower water use and 16% higher water use efficiency compared to CT. The NTB and NTF required 24.7% and 10.8% less irrigation water than CTF system, respectively with 11.5% higher system productivity and demonstrated higher water productivity. The NTB and NTF systems provided similar net returns (averaged over 3 years) in maize-wheat system (MWS), which were US$ 281ha-1 higher compared to CTF system. The CTF system had higher bulk density and penetration resistance in 10-15 and 15-20cm soil layers due to compaction caused by the repeated tillage. The steady-state infiltration rate and soil aggregation (>0.25mm) were higher under NTB and NTF and lower in the CTF system. Similarly, mean weight diameter (MWD) of aggregates was higher under NTF and NTB compared to CTF. The study reveals that NTB and NTF systems could be more viable options for MWS in order to save input costs and enhance profitability; however, the long-term effects of these alternative technologies need to be studied under varying agro-ecologies. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.

Singh V.K.,Project Directorate for Cropping Systems Research | Dwivedi B.S.,Project Directorate for Cropping Systems Research | Shukla A.K.,Project Directorate for Cropping Systems Research | Mishra R.P.,Project Directorate for Cropping Systems Research
Field Crops Research | Year: 2010

In the Indo-Gangetic Plain region, a major deterrent to large scale adoption of the otherwise advantageous pigeonpea-wheat cropping system is the poor crop stand of pigeonpea due to temporary water logging during the rainy (monsoon) season, leading to its low productivity and a smaller residual effect on the succeeding wheat crop. The permanent raised bed (PRB) system of planting, as widely used particularly for wheat in different countries, has seldom been studied in the pigeonpea-wheat system. We, therefore, conducted a field experiment at Modipuram (29°4′N, 77°46′E, 237 m asl), India, for 3 consecutive years (2001-02 to 2003-04) to evaluate the PRB vis-à-vis the conventional flat bed (FB) system of planting at varying fertilizer NP rates in the pigeonpea-wheat system, in terms of changes in soil organic carbon, nutrient and water use efficiencies, annual productivity and economic returns. Pigeonpea grown on PRB had lower plant mortality (4-7%) and higher yield (1.6-2.1 t ha -1) as compared to FB with 26-36% mortality and yield of 1.3-1.8 t ha -1. Pigeonpea on PRB had greater N and P recycling (11-23% N and 8-14% P) through its residue comprising root, stubble and leaf litter. Although wheat yield following pigeonpea under PRB was lower (p < 0.05) compared with that under FB, the system productivity in terms of wheat equivalent yield was 8.44% higher under PRB. The economic optimum doses of fertilizer N and P for wheat in the pigeonpea-wheat system were smaller (128 kg N and 28 kg P ha -1) under PRB as compared to FB (152 kg N and 30 kg P ha -1) owing to increased N and P supply, greater P use efficiency and a better crop growth environment under PRB planting. The N use efficiency indices were significantly greater (p < 0.05) in wheat under FB compared to those under PRB. By contrast, P use efficiency was greater under PRB, particularly in treatments that received both N and P fertilizers. Compared with FB, the root mass density (20-46%) of wheat was also greater under PRB in surface and sub-surface soil layers. PRB favored saving of irrigation water by 9.5-13.4 ha cm and improved the irrigation application efficiency by 9.5-13.4% and the irrigation use efficiency by 19-28 kg ha cm -1 over FB. The post-wheat harvest nitrate N (NO 3-N) at 20-40 cm soil depth in plots fertilized with 120 or 180 kg N ha -1 was greater under FB planting (10.25-13.81 mg kg -1) compared to PRB (7.33-8.42 mg kg -1), suggesting that PRB planting might reduce NO 3-N leaching to deeper soil layers. Similarly, in the treatments that received both N and P, NO 3-N in soil below 20 cm depth was lower compared to those receiving N or P alone. After three crop cycles, soil OC and the Olsen-P content in the 0-20 cm depth were increased compared to the initial content under both planting techniques but the magnitude of increase was greater under PRB. Compared with FB, the annual net returns of the pigeonpea-wheat system were greater by US$ 210 ha -1 under PRB, and the crop also required less specific energy (1.99 MJ kg -1) compared with the FB planting (3.18 MJ kg -1). © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Discover hidden collaborations