Leiden, Netherlands
Leiden, Netherlands

Time filter

Source Type

— Global Broth Industry Report offers market overview, segmentation by types, application, countries, key manufactures, cost analysis, industrial chain, sourcing strategy, downstream buyers, marketing strategy analysis, distributors/traders, factors affecting market, forecast and other important information for key insight. Companies profiled in this report are Campbell Soup Company, Pacific Foods Of Oregon, College Inn, Progresso, Knorr, Manischewitz, Paleo Broth Company, Bonafide Provisions, Bare Bones Broth in terms of Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors, Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017). Split by Product Types, with sales, revenue, price, market share of each type, can be divided into • Chicken Broth • Beef Broth • Vegetable Broth Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Broth in each application, can be divided into • Residential application Purchase a copy of this report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/buy-now/501901 Table of Content: 1 Broth Market Overview 2 Global Broth Sales, Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Manufacturers 3 Global Broth Sales, Revenue (Value) by Countries, Type and Application (2012-2017) 4 Global Broth Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 5 North America Broth Sales, Revenue (Value) by Countries, Type and Application (2012-2017) 6 Latin America Broth Sales, Revenue (Value) by Countries, Type and Application (2012-2017) 7 Europe Broth Sales, Revenue (Value) by Countries, Type and Application (2012-2017) 8 Asia-Pacific Broth Sales, Revenue (Value) by Countries, Type and Application (2012-2017) 9 Middle East and Africa Broth Sales, Revenue (Value) by Countries, Type and Application (2012-2017) 10 Broth Manufacturing Cost Analysis 11 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers 12 Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders 13 Market Effect Factors Analysis 14 Global Broth Market Forecast (2017-2022) 15 Research Findings and Conclusion 16 Appendix Inquire more for more details about this report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/ask-your-query/501901 For more information, please visit https://www.themarketreports.com/report/2017-2022-global-top-countries-broth-market-report


Evangelista S.D.S.,Progresso | Dos Santos S.G.,Federal University of Minas Gerais | De Resende Stoianoff M.A.,Federal University of Minas Gerais | De Oliveira A.C.,Progresso
American Journal of Infection Control | Year: 2015

Background We aimed to monitor the microbial load and identify the microorganisms recovered from surgical instruments after clinical use and following manual and automated cleaning. Methods This experimental study was carried out in the Laboratory of Oral Microbiology and Anaerobes at the Federal University of Minas Gerais in Brazil. Microbial samples were taken from 125 surgical instruments used in 25 types of gastrointestinal surgeries. Results The average microbial load was 93.1 CFU/100 mL after clinical use and 41 CFU/100 mL and 8.24 CFU/100 mL on instruments following 2 sequential steps of manual cleaning, respectively, and 75 CFU/100 mL and 16.1 CFU/100 mL on instruments after automated cleaning. Surgical wound classification significantly affected the microbial load recovered on instruments. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex were recovered. Conclusions The average microbial load observed after the cleaning steps decreased, and the decrease in microbial load was more pronounced using the manual method compared with that observed using the automated method. © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. All rights reserved.


Teixeira C.M.,Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuaria de Minas Gerais Epamig | de Carvalho G.J.,Federal University of Lavras | Silva C.A.,Federal University of Lavras | de Andrade M.J.B.,Federal University of Lavras | Pereira J.M.,Progresso
Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo | Year: 2010

Nutrients recycle is related to the absorption capacity by different cover crop species. Already speeds of decomposition and of nutrient release of straws produced is mostly related with C/N ratio, with a marked difference between grasses and leguminous. In this sense, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production and macronutrient contents and accumulation, decomposition, and nutrient release from straw of millet (Pennisetum typhoides (Burm.) Stapf) and millet - jack - bean (Canavalia ensiformes (L.) DC.) intercropping, under field conditions, under common bean, sown in August (winter/spring). Decomposition and nutrient release was determined in nylon bags (0.2 × 0.2 m, 1 mm mesh) filled with straw quantities according to the area of the bag. The experimental design was randomized blocks with four replications in split plot arrangement. The straws represented the plots and the subplots evaluation periods (0, 8, 16, 24, 40, 56, and 72 days). The residues were dried to constant weight in a forced-air oven at 65 °C to determine the remaining dry matter, then ground and sent to a laboratory to analyze macronutrient contents. Based on the contents and remaining dry matter amounts, the remaining nutrient amounts were determined, expressed in relation to the initial amount. Non-linear models were fit to the values, choosing the best adjustment in each case. Biomass quantity, N and Ca contents and cycling of nutrient quantities was greatest in the intercropping straw. The decomposition and nutrient release speeds were also highest in millet - jack - bean intercropping straw.


Patent
Progresso | Date: 2014-10-24

The present invention is based on the surprising discovery that the overexpression of the SCL gene, of nucleotide sequence SEQ ID NO: 1, increases the production of megakaryocytes and platelets from stem cells. Likewise, it has been proven that this increase also occurs using PSCs which, unlike CD34+ HSC cells which have a limited expansion capacity, are characterized by an unlimited growth capacity, and can result in the unlimited production of platelets for the use thereof in clinics.


News Article | April 19, 2006
Site: arstechnica.com

Which company owns the following brands: Bisquick, Bugles, Cheerios, Chex, Fruit by the Foot, Fruit Roll-Ups, Green Giant, Hagen-Dazs, Hamburger Helper, Lucky Charms, Natural Valley, Old El Paso, Pillsbury, Pop Secret, Progresso, Trix, Wheaties, and Yoplait among others? If you said Apple, you couldn't be more wrong and you need to remove yourself from your Apple-stickered bubble. The answer is, of course, General Mills: the latest company to jump on the iTunes giveaway bandwagon. Joining the ranks of Pepsi-Co and 7-11, General Mills, according to iLounge, will be producing specially-marked boxes of the company's cereals—Lucky Charms, Cheerios, Cookie Crisp, and Cinnamon Toast Crunch—that will hold a code that can be exchanged for a free iTunes music download. Furthermore, one in every ten boxes will include five bonus songs. Of course all of these cereals are a part of this complete breakfast, so feel free to dig in.


News Article | May 31, 2012
Site: gigaom.com

One advantage of working remotely, and particularly of working from home, is the ability to bring your personal and professional lives closer together, reducing conflict between different types of obligations. But what if your professional and personal life are a bit too close together – like, for example, your fellow remote worker spouse sitting a few feet away from you all day? Potential problems are, obviously, numerous, as a first person narration of a dual remote worker marriage in Marie Claire illustrates. With sections written by both members of a telecommuting couple, the piece enumerates the many challenges of a spouse joining his or her hubby in home working. Chris Norris, the first member of the couple to go remote, describes what it was like to suddenly have his wife, Ellen Carpenter, around the house after she was laid off and started working freelance. He chooses a frankly homicidal reference: For six months now, my wife and I, both writers, have been working at home together in our one-bedroom apartment. If the precariousness of this situation isn’t obvious, I refer you to the best film ever about shared domestic work space: The Shining. There’s Jack Nicholson’s would-be author, self-exiled in an empty hotel. Typewriter clacking, he squints into the page—limning, seeking, probing, his mind finally edging up against that drifting, vaporous thought, when … “Hi, Hon!” chirps googly-eyed Shelley Duvall. “Get a lot written today?” The ax murders that follow are excessive, I grant you, but incomprehensible? I don’t judge. True, our two-desk living room is no Overlook Hotel — even if it is a feng-shui horror show — and Ellen respects its sanctity. But I do feel like a crucial curtain has been pulled back. In our courtship phase, when she worked at an office, she would often swing by my place after work and find me lounging on the couch in a rumpled Agnès B. shirt (just put on), an open book on the table (unread), and another finished project on the screen. “Yep,” I’d say. “This is where the magic happens.” Now she knows what the magic actually looks like. For her part, Carpenter didn’t suffer from a loss of privacy or murderous hallucinations but from the imposition of domestic expectations on her professional time. The couple set ground rules about interrupting each other when she started working from home, she writes, agreeing that, From 10 to 6, Monday through Friday, we’d be colleagues. But very quickly, I took on other roles as well. Because Chris was used to my only being home in the evenings (making dinner) or on the weekends (making lunch, Swiffering the floor), certain primal, gender-specific assumptions were activated. Coworker? Try personal chef, maid, cheerleader, dog walker, masseuse, and make-out partner — on call, 24/7. In my attempt to adapt to his routine, I unconsciously stepped into some kind of ’50s, June Cleaver stereotype. The first week, I offered to make lunch. The next, I volunteered to read an article he had just finished and to give him feedback prior to its submission — that is, to tell him it’s great. The week after that, I assumed laundry duties. Slowly but surely, all this wrought a learned helplessness I still can’t quite believe. My husband was once a strong, independent man who’d return from a six-mile run with a bouquet of my beloved dahlias. Now he can’t crack open a can of Progresso. By the end of the Marie Claire article, you’re really, really rooting for Carpenter to get another office-based job. Are things always so grim for couples that work from home together? A recent two-part interview of another remote working couple on blog How to Work From Home offers more grounds for hope. Again, the wife, coach Maria Varallo, struggles more to separate the domestic and the professional. “There are times I find it too much being mom and wife whilst being a professional all at once,” she says. But in this case, having a partner working at home seems to have affected the husband in the opposite way it did Norris. Rather than reverting to 1950s-era stereotypes, Varallo’s husband Kris, a database administrator, has actually become more aware of all the effort that goes into running a family. “The great thing about working from home is Kris is far more sensitive to what needs doing. I especially have noticed over the years as my work has grown and become more established how the house becomes very relaxed,” Varallo says. “If I put on the washing in the morning he’ll put it out if I’m out, he is aware and I think that’s because he also works from home.” So how do you get a situation more like Varallo’s and less like Carpenter’s? Steve Cooper, co-founder of Hitched, an online magazine for married couples, recently offered some tips to Forbes. Citing a recent letter his magazine received from a woman with a problem (e.g. husband) much like Carpenter’s as inspiration, Cooper offers these suggestions: Define Your Workspace. Having a space of your own is extremely important, even if one of you has to work from the kitchen table. If possible, set up shop in two separate rooms on opposite sides of your home. Create Office Hours. If you only have one room that can work comfortably as a home office, [owner of The Protocol School of Texas Diane] Gottsman says you might trade use of that room by creating work hours. Communication. Dialogue with each other is paramount. “You have to be able to talk to each other and really be honest without becoming defensive,” says Gottsman. Have a conversation where you explain what you need, when you need it and how these ground rules need to be followed going forward. Dealing with the Family. Your boundaries should be very, very clear. “We want to feel like what we’re doing is of value and that our spouse also values us,” says Gottsman. “It may not seem as important, but if we’re doing it, it is important.” Your family needs to know they cannot walk in to your office and interrupt. Check out the full article for more detailed advice. Author Jenna McCarthy has also offered tips to TheMogulMom, including, “if you have the occasional need to check in with your spouse throughout the day, you can save a ton of time by setting up an IM account.” As well as, “be mysterious…. wives tend to way overshare when it comes to the minutia of their lives. Your dude doesn’t need (or want) to hear a play-by-play of your day.” Though one wonders if husbands are really immune from long-winded explanations of their professional trials and tribulations (personal experiences says no), this last tip makes sense if applied to both genders. Has working at home with your partner changed the gender dynamics between you, i.e. is one person taking on a more or less traditional role around the house?


News Article | August 24, 2011
Site: www.wired.com

Watching Libyan strongman Moammar Ghadafi scramble for his life this week offers some highly relevant lessons for the renewable industry: That third one might be the most important. Like the other deposed dictators in the region, Gadhafi fell because he forgot — time and time again — to placate his subjects. Even in legitimate governments, politicians might bow to lobbyists, but they should live in constant fear of the people they lead. The renewable industry has surged when voters get angry. History reveals: Note also how environmental causes easily cross party lines. Roosevelt, Nixon, Schultz and Schwarzenegger all served as Republicans and the Chinese Communist Party is the pro-business incumbent. George Bush the First created the first cap-and-trade scheme for acid rain. Gadhafi’s teachable moment comes at an opportune time too. Most of the visceral emotion leading up to the 2012 election exists on the anti-environmental side. Presidential candidate Rick Perry the Cable Guy claims that scientists distort their findings on climate change to win grants. The EPA  routinely gets trashed as a job killer. For a few years, many on the renewables side believed that a charismatic leader could create a broad-based constituency for green technology. We have such a leader. Unfortunately, Bill Clinton has already served two terms, so the industry will have to fight dirty. The situation, luckily, can likely still be reversed. As the examples above show, voters will go green — and their leaders will follow like a cow with a ring stuck through its nose — when a direct, concrete nexus exists between their own lifestyle and new regulations.


News Article | December 6, 2016
Site: marketersmedia.com

— Market Research Future published a half cooked research report on the global soups market has been estimated to grow over 3% post 2022. Market Highlights: Soups market is experiencing a continuous growth in the last few years. Increase in working women population and demand for healthy alternatives for fast food/junk food have resulted in the growth of this market. Major players in the soup market are investing on research and development to create new products and innovative packaging. In many countries, soup vending machines have been employed, making it convenient for the consumers. Taste the market data and market information presented through more than 60 market data tables and figures spread over 100 numbers of pages of the project report. Avail the in-depth table of content TOC & market synopsis on “The Global Soups Market Research Report -Forecast to 2022”. Key Players of Global Soup Market: • Campbell’s (U.S.) • Heinz (U.S.) • Nestle (Switzerland) • Progresso (U.S.) • Matinga (Lithuania) • Sill Enterprises (France) • Imagine Foods, Inc. (U.S.) • Storme (Belgium) • Wilki (Belgium) • Kettle Cuisine (U.S.) Market Research Analysis: • Rapid innovation in the soup products inclusion of various flavors, region-specific taste like Chinese soups, Mediterranean soups is driving the soups market. • Soups is generally considered as healthy foods and as a main part of the meal, has led to innovation in various functional formats like low fat, low sugar, protein-rich, and dietary-fiber rich has also supported the soups market to a greater extent. Reasons to Buy: • The study includes detailed market analysis of soups market encompassing its macro and micro-markets. • It covers market segmentation by type, by ingredients and by format. • It helps in identifying region-wise major suppliers and understand consumption patterns. • The report will provide useful and premium insights that will support in investments for soups and allied companies providing details on the fast growing segments and regions. • In addition, it will provide key findings that will help the companies to improve profitability by using supply chain strategies, cost effectiveness of various products mentioned in the report. • The data used in the report is primarily based on primary interviews with the major producing companies and industry experts and also supported by authentic industry data from secondary sources. Brief TOC for Soups Market: 1 Executive Summary 2 Market Introduction 2.1 Definition 2.2 Scope of the study 2.2.1 Research Objectives 2.2.2 Assumptions 2.2.3 Limitations 2.3 Markets Structure 2.4 Stakeholders 3 Research Methodology 3.1 Research process 3.2 Secondary research 3.3 Primary research 3.4 Forecast model 3.5 Market Size estimation 4 Market Dynamics 4.1 Drivers 4.2 Restraints 4.3 Opportunities 4.4 Challenges 5 Market Trends 5.1 Trends in Supply/Production 5.2 Trends in Demand/Consumption 5.3 Emerging Markets (Supply & Demand) 5.4 Emerging Brands 5.5 Trade (Import-export) Analysis 5.6 Innovations in Products/Process 5.7 Macroeconomic indicators Analysis for top 5 Producing countries Related Report: Global Sourdough Market Information- by Starter culture (Type I (Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis), Type II (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Type III (Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus plantarum, L. brevis), by Ingredients (Whole-wheat, Rye, Oats, Barley, and others), by Application (Baking bases (Bread, Pizza, Cake, Buns, Cookies, Waffles & Pancakes and Others) and by Region - Forecast to 2022 Know more about this report @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/global-sourdough-research-report-forecast-to-2022 About Market Research Future: At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services. MRFR team have supreme objective to provide the optimum quality market research and intelligence services to our clients. Our market research studies by products, services, technologies, applications, end users, and market players for global, regional, and country level market segments, enable our clients to see more, know more, and do more, which help to answer all their most important questions. For more information, please visit https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/


News Article | February 23, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

— Market Research Future published a half cooked research report on the global soups market has been estimated to grow over 3% post 2022. Market Highlights: Soups market is experiencing a continuous growth in the last few years. Increase in working women population and demand for healthy alternatives for fast food/junk food have resulted in the growth of this market. Major players in the soup market are investing on research and development to create new products and innovative packaging. In many countries, soup vending machines have been employed, making it convenient for the consumers. Taste the market data and market information presented through more than 60 market data tables and figures spread over 100 numbers of pages of the project report. Avail the in-depth table of content TOC & market synopsis on “Global Soups Market Research Report - Forecast to 2022”. Key Players of Global Soup Market: • Campbell’s (U.S.) • Heinz (U.S.) • Nestle (Switzerland) • Progresso (U.S.) • Matinga (Lithuania) • Sill Enterprises (France) • Imagine Foods, Inc. (U.S.) • Storme (Belgium) • Wilki (Belgium) • Kettle Cuisine (U.S.) Market Research Analysis: • Rapid innovation in the soup products inclusion of various flavors, region-specific taste like Chinese soups, Mediterranean soups is driving the soups market. • Soups is generally considered as healthy foods and as a main part of the meal, has led to innovation in various functional formats like low fat, low sugar, protein-rich, and dietary-fiber rich has also supported the soups market to a greater extent. Reasons to Buy: • The study includes detailed market analysis of soups market encompassing its macro and micro-markets. • It covers market segmentation by type, by ingredients and by format. • It helps in identifying region-wise major suppliers and understand consumption patterns. • The report will provide useful and premium insights that will support in investments for soups and allied companies providing details on the fast growing segments and regions. • In addition, it will provide key findings that will help the companies to improve profitability by using supply chain strategies, cost effectiveness of various products mentioned in the report. • The data used in the report is primarily based on primary interviews with the major producing companies and industry experts and also supported by authentic industry data from secondary sources. Brief TOC for Soups Market: 1 Executive Summary 2 Market Introduction 2.1 Definition 2.2 Scope of the study 2.2.1 Research Objectives 2.2.2 Assumptions 2.2.3 Limitations 2.3 Markets Structure 2.4 Stakeholders 3 Research Methodology 3.1 Research process 3.2 Secondary research 3.3 Primary research 3.4 Forecast model 3.5 Market Size estimation 4 Market Dynamics 4.1 Drivers 4.2 Restraints 4.3 Opportunities 4.4 Challenges 5 Market Trends 5.1 Trends in Supply/Production 5.2 Trends in Demand/Consumption 5.3 Emerging Markets (Supply & Demand) 5.4 Emerging Brands 5.5 Trade (Import-export) Analysis 5.6 Innovations in Products/Process 5.7 Macroeconomic indicators Analysis for top 5 Producing countries Continue… About Market Research Future: At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services. MRFR team have supreme objective to provide the optimum quality market research and intelligence services to our clients. Our market research studies by products, services, technologies, applications, end users, and market players for global, regional, and country level market segments, enable our clients to see more, know more, and do more, which help to answer all their most important questions. For more information, please visit https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/

Loading Progresso collaborators
Loading Progresso collaborators