News Article | May 21, 2017
A decision by the Republican governor of Maine, Paul LePage, to ban signs to Katahdin Woods and Waters, a national monument designated by Barack Obama, has been described as “sophomoric and petty” by a member of the family that donated the 87,563-acre tract to the nation. LePage made the controversial move, which was announced on Friday, pending the outcome of a federal review of 27 national monuments ordered by Donald Trump in April and being carried out by the US interior secretary, Ryan Zinke. In February, LePage asked Trump to reverse Katahdin’s designation, arguing that Obama had violated the federal Antiquities Act. “I think it was a horrible, horrible decision and it should be reversed if it can,” he said in remarks reported by the Portland Press Herald. A state transportation spokesman, Ted Talbot, said in remarks reported by the Bangor Daily News that the refusal to allow official signs for Katahdin to be placed along main roads, including interstate 95 and routes 11, 157 and 159, was a cost-saving measure. “What we don’t want to do is commit taxpayers’ money to signage or any type of project without knowing that it [the monument] is in place and that everyone is on board with it,” he said. Conservationists, however, fear a federally mandated effort to strip public lands of environmental protections. Lucas St Clair, whose family acquired the land using the Burt’s Bees fortune, told the Guardian that the governor’s refusal to erect signs was “spiteful and destructive”. “It’s one of the most irresponsible things he could do for the region,” St Clair added. “To place signs to show the way to the national monument is a simple thing. It could even be [done with] private money. But he has refused to allow that to happen. It’s a sophomoric and petty way to behave.” Under direction from Trump, Zinke is considering scaling back or redesignating tens of thousands of acres of protected land that could then be turned over to state governments, thereby becoming subject to looser standards regarding commercial exploitation including drilling and mining. Zinke began the review process two weeks ago at Bears Ears in Utah, a site sacred to Native Americans and one of the largest Obama-era monument designations. In Maine, US interior department officials will review whether the Katahdin proposal was adequately vetted by stakeholders. The process is due to finish on 24 August. Environmentalists, including St Clair, claim LePage’s attempt to deny signage is an attempt to cut visitor numbers to Katahdin in its first full season as a monument. At a meeting of the Natural Resources Council of Maine on Friday, several former opponents of monument status said the governor’s actions would hurt the region. Jon Ellis, a local business owner, said LePage was out of step. “To my knowledge, Governor LePage has never even set foot [here] and yet he insults our region by calling it a ‘mosquito area’,” Ellis said in a statement reported by the Associated Press. “The monument has brought new energy to our towns and helped unify the region.” Most monuments under federal review exceed 100,000 acres. St Clair claimed LePage petitioned the Trump administration to include Katahdin, which is slightly smaller. “This is very different to the Organ Mountains in New Mexico or the monuments in Utah,” he said. “This was private land that my family owned and wanted to donate to create a national park, and really it’s just one outspoken person – the governor – who wants it to be rescinded.” Environmentalists claim the Katahdin land will create its own commercial purpose as a relatively pristine destination for outdoor recreation. Others claim the land, which lies in the shadow of Mount Katahdin, Maine’s highest peak, would be better returned to timber production. “They fail to realize the land was sold to us by people from the forest products industry because it was no longer valuable to them as a landscape to log and cut trees,” St Clair said. “That argument that this is taking this land out of potential fiber production is absurd.” LePage’s decision to block signage is entirely self-serving, St Clair maintained, “because the only reason it is under review is because he asked for it to be under review. LePage is trying to undermine the benefit of a national monument from a tourism perspective. Then he will point to that and say, ‘See! It wasn’t worthy of being a monument.’ “The best thing the public can do is comment on the department of the interior’s website and demonstrate their appreciation for the landscape by going and enjoying it.”
News Article | May 23, 2017
National monuments are under attack by the current President, but one would think that the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument in Maine would be safe. It was private land assembled by Roxanne Quimby, who made zillions out of Burt’s Bees. She donated the land (worth $60 million) to the government along with $ 20 million to support it. Who could possibly be against such a thing? According to Edward Helmore writing in the Guardian, the Governor of Maine, Paul LePage. Supposedly the problem is that it takes land away from the forestry industry, even though it was bought from forestry companies who had already logged it out. The President made a big deal of it while campaigning; according to the Portland Press Herald: Trump railed against Obama’s creation of the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument during a campaign stop in Bangor on Oct. 15. Speaking to a fired-up crowd of more than 3,500, Trump accused Obama of making the designation with “no consideration” for local concerns, impacts on the forestry industry or opposition from lawmakers. Trump pledged that, under his administration “we’re going to protect the right of people and the people of Maine to use their own land.” Except that is exactly what the owner, Roxanne Quimby, was doing: using her own land the way she wanted to. Now LePage is using his power to ensure that there are no signs, no directions, no information on how to get there. Lucas St Clair, whose family acquired the land using the Burt’s Bees fortune, told the Guardian that the governor’s refusal to erect signs was “spiteful and destructive”. “It’s one of the most irresponsible things he could do for the region,” St Clair added. “To place signs to show the way to the national monument is a simple thing. It could even be [done with] private money. But he has refused to allow that to happen. It’s a sophomoric and petty way to behave.” And in the age of google maps, probably useless. And even people who were against it being declared a monument are upset. Jon Ellis, a local business owner, said LePage was out of step. “To my knowledge, Governor LePage has never even set foot [here] and yet he insults our region by calling it a ‘mosquito area’,” Ellis said in a statement reported by the Associated Press. “The monument has brought new energy to our towns and helped unify the region.” We have noted previously how parks and national monuments are huge economic draws, tourist attractions and job creators. Yet out of spite, this one may be lost, even though it will be probably decades before it can be logged again. And given who the President and the Secretary of the Interior are, we can expect the worst.
News Article | May 4, 2017
A legislative committee in Augusta, Maine has voted to toughen penalties on lobstermen who fish too many traps or use "sunken trawls", reports the Portland Press Herald. This is part of an industry-supported efforts to crack down on lawbreakers in lobstering in Maine -- an industry worth $500 million last year. “I do think this is going to get people’s attention and will hopefully make people realize that it doesn’t pay to cheat,” said Patrice McCarron, executive director of the Maine Lobstermen’s Association. Lawmakers are considering a suite of requests from the Maine Department of Marine Resources (DMR) for more enforcement tools and tougher sanctions against violators. A bill unanimously endorsed by the Marine Resources Committee, L.D. 575, would allow DMR’s commissioner to order longer license suspensions for lobstermen who violate the laws on the first offense. In some cases it would also permanently revoke the licenses of repeat offenders. For the complete article, click here.
Chihuly Workshop Inc. and Portland Press Inc. | Date: 2012-03-14
Protective glasses; computer carrying cases. Notebooks. Tote bags. Cups and mugs, flasks. Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hats, beanies, gloves and aprons. Ornamental novelty buttons; embroidered patches for clothing.
van Klaveren F.,The Biochemical Society |
Starley P.,Portland Press Ltd |
Davies H.,The Biochemical Society |
Marshall A.,Portland Press Ltd |
Cole K.,Portland Press Ltd
Biochemist | Year: 2011
In September 2007, a Biochemical Society delegation comprising Professor George Banting (then the Chair of the Biochemical Journal Editorial Board), Professor Peter Shepherd (then the incoming Chair of the Biochemical Journal Editorial Board) and senior Biochemical Society staff visited institutions in Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou and Hong Kong to raise awareness of the Society and its publishing portfolio in China [see The Biochemist, Vol. 29 (December), pp. 24-28]. The relationships established on this trip were further strengthened at the 21st IUBMB and 12th FAOBMB Meeting in Shanghai in August 2009, where a Biochemical Society/Portland Press stand to promote our membership and publishing activities attracted interest from many delegates. These initial steps into China have now reaped rewards with two major initiatives coming to fruition this year. © 2011 The Biochemical Society.
Black C.,Portland Press Ltd
Biochemist | Year: 2012
Bibliometrics is the term used to describe various approaches to analysing measures of the use of academic literature, in particular articles in peer-reviewed journals. More broadly, the topic addresses the validity or otherwise of these measures as indicators of the impact, influence or value of the research being reported. These measures, and in particular the journal Impact Factor, are used as evidence for the quality of research, to make decisions about appointments, to judge a journal editor's success, and (it is assumed) to make funding decisions. Until recently, bibliometrics was mainly about citations, but now it is increasingly common to measure online usage, and even tweets, blogging and user star-ratings when assessing the contribution of a published research article. © 2012 The Biochemical Society.
Oliver R.,Portland Press Ltd
Biochemist | Year: 2010
In December 2009, the US Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President and the White House Open Government Initiative launched a public consultation on Public Access Policy. The Administration sought comments from public on the access to publicly funded research results, such as those that appear in academic and scholarly journal articles. Currently, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) require that research funded by its grants be made available to the public online, free, within 12 months of publication. The Administration canvassed opinion on whether this policy should be extended to other science agencies and, if so, how. © 2010 The Biochemical Society.