Time filter

Source Type

Carambeí, Brazil

Vasconcelos J.L.M.,Sao Paulo State University | Cooke R.F.,Oregon State University | Jardina D.T.G.,Sao Paulo State University | Aragon F.L.,Pioneiros Veterinary Clinic | And 2 more authors.
Animal Reproduction Science | Year: 2011

The objective of this study was to evaluate the associations among milk production, rectal temperature, and pregnancy maintenance in lactating recipient dairy cows. Data were collected during an 11-mo period from 463 Holstein cows (203 primiparous and 260 multiparous) assigned to a fixed-time embryo transfer (ET) protocol. Only cows detected with a visible corpus luteum immediately prior to ET were used. Rectal temperatures were collected from all cows on the same day of ET. Milk production at ET was calculated by averaging individual daily milk production during the 7. d preceding ET. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal ultrasonography 21. d after ET. Cows were ranked and assigned to groups according to median milk production (median = 35. kg/d; HPROD = above median; LPROD = below median) and rectal temperature (≤39.0 °C = LTEMP; >39.0 °C = HTEMP). A milk production × temperature group interaction was detected (P= 0.04) for pregnancy analysis because HTEMP cows ranked as LPROD were 3.1 time more likely to maintain pregnancy compared with HTEMP cows ranked as HPROD (P= 0.03). Milk production did not affect (P= 0.55) odds of pregnancy maintenance within LTEMP cows, however, and no differences in odds of pregnancy maintenance were detected between HTEMP and LTEMP within milk production groups (P> 0.11). Within HTEMP cows, increased milk production decreased the probability of pregnancy maintenance linearly, whereas within LTEMP cows, increased milk production increased the probability of pregnancy maintenance linearly. Within HPROD, increased rectal temperature decreased the probability of pregnancy maintenance linearly, whereas within LPROD cows, no associations between rectal temperatures and probability of cows to maintain pregnancy were detected. In summary, high-producing dairy cows with rectal temperatures below 39.0 °C did not experience reduced pregnancy maintenance to ET compared to cohorts with reduced milk production. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. Source

Pereira M.H.C.,Sao Paulo State University | Sanches C.P.,Sao Paulo State University | Guida T.G.,Sao Paulo State University | Rodrigues A.D.P.,Sao Paulo State University | And 5 more authors.
Journal of Dairy Science | Year: 2013

Objectives were to investigate progesterone concentrations and fertility comparing 2 different intervals from PGF2α treatment and induced ovulation in an estrogen-based ovulation synchronization protocol for timed artificial insemination (TAI) or timed embryo transfer (TET) in lactating dairy cows. A total of 1,058 lactating Holstein cows [primiparous (n=371) and multiparous (n=687)], yielding 34.1±0.33 kg of milk/d at various days in milk were randomly assigned to receive treatment with PGF2α on either d 7 or 8 of the following protocol: d 0: 2mg of estradiol benzoate + controlled internal drug release device; d 8: controlled internal drug release device removal + 1.0mg of estradiol cypionate; d 10: TAI or d 17: TET. Only cows with a corpus luteum at d 17 received an embryo and all cows received GnRH at TET. Pregnancy diagnoses were performed by detection (transrectal ultrasonography) of an embryo on d 28 or a fetus on d 60. Fertility [pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) or pregnancy per embryo transfer (P/ET)] was affected by breeding technique (AI vs. ET) and time of PGF2α treatment (d 7 vs. 8) at the 28-d pregnancy diagnosis for TAI [32.9% (238) vs. 20.6% (168)] and TET cows [47% (243) vs. 40.7% (244)] and at the 60-d pregnancy diagnosis for TAI [30% (238) vs. 19.2% (168)] and TET cows [37.9% (243) vs. 33.5% (244)]. The progesterone (P4) concentration at d 10 altered fertility in TAI cows, with higher P/AI in cows with P4 concentration <0.1 ng/mL compared with cows with P4 concentration ≥0.1 ng/mL, and in ET cows, with higher P/ET in cows with P4 concentration <0.22 ng/mL compared with cows with P4 concentration ≥0.22 ng/mL. Prostaglandin F2α treatment at d 7 increased the percentage of cows with P4 <0.1 ng/mL on d 10 [39.4 (85) vs. 23.2 (54)]. Reducing the period between PGF2α and TAI from 72 to 48h in dairy cows resulted in a clear reduction in fertility in cows bred by TAI and a subtle negative effect in cows that received TET. The earlier PGF2α treatment benefits are most likely mediated through gamete transport, fertilization, or early embryo development and a more subtle effect of earlier PGF2α treatment that may be mediated through changes in the uterine or hormonal environment that manifests itself after ET on d 7. © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Source

Vasconcelos J.L.M.,Sao Paulo State University | Jardina D.T.G.,Sao Paulo State University | Sa Filho O.G.,Sao Paulo State University | Aragon F.L.,Pioneiros Veterinary Clinic | Veras M.B.,Pioneiros Veterinary Clinic
Theriogenology | Year: 2011

The objective was to compare two protocols for synchronizing ovulation in lactating Holstein cows submitted to timed AI (TAI) or timed ET (TET). Within each farm (n = 8), cows (n = 883; mean ± SEM 166.24 ± 3.27 d postpartum, yielding 36.8 ± 0.34 kg of milk/d) were randomly assigned to receive either: 1) an intravaginal progesterone insert (CIDR®) with 1.9 g of progesterone + GnRH on Day -10, CIDR® withdrawal + PGF2α on Day -3, and 1 mg estradiol cypionate on Day -2 (treatment GP-P-E; nTAI = 180; nTET = 260); or 2) a CIDR® insert + 2 mg estradiol benzoate on Day -10, PGF2α on Day -3, CIDR® withdrawal + 1 mg estradiol cypionate on Day -2 (treatment EP-P-E; nTAI = 174; nTET = 269). Cows were subsequently randomly assigned to receive either TAI on Day 0 or TET on Day 7. Serum progesterone concentration on Day -3 was greater in GP-P-E than in EP-P-E (2.89 ± 0.15 vs 2.29 ± 0.15 ng/mL; P < 0.01), with no significant effect of group on serum progesterone on Day 7. Compared to cows submitted to TAI, those submitted to TET had greater pregnancy rates on Day 28 (44.0% [233/529] vs 29.7% [105/354]; P < 0.001) and on Day 60 (37.6% [199/529] vs 26.5 [94/354]; P < 0.001). However, there were no effects of treatments (GP-P-E vs EP-P-E; P > 0.10) on synchronization (87.0% [383/440] vs 85.3% [378/443]), conception (TAI: 35.3% [55/156] vs 33.8% [50/148]; TET: 50.7% [115/227] vs 51.3% [118/230]) and pregnancy rates on Days 28 (TAI: 30.5% [55/180] vs 28.7% [50/174]; TET: 44.2% [115/260] vs 43.9% [118/269]) and 60 (TAI: 27.2% [49/80] vs 25.9% [45/174]; TET: 38.8% [101/260] vs 36.4% [98/269]). In conclusion, GP-P-E increased serum progesterone concentrations on Day -3, but rates of synchronization, conception, and pregnancy were not significantly different between cows submitted to GP-P-E and EP-P-E protocols, regardless of whether they were inseminated or received an embryo. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Source

Discover hidden collaborations