Experimental Research Center Pharmaceutical
Experimental Research Center Pharmaceutical
Pantazopoulos I.N.,Sotiria General Hospital |
Xanthos T.T.,National and Kapodistrian University of Athens |
Vlachos I.,National and Kapodistrian University of Athens |
Troupis G.,National and Kapodistrian University of Athens |
And 4 more authors.
Critical Care Medicine | Year: 2012
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether intermittent impedance of inspiratory gas exchange improves hemodynamic parameters, 48-hr survival, and neurologic outcome in a swine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest treated with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Laboratory investigation. SUBJECTS: Thirty healthy Landrace/Large-White piglets of both sexes, aged 10 to 15 wks, whose average weight was 19 ± 2 kg. INTERVENTIONS: At approximately 7 mins following endotracheal tube clamping, ventricular fibrillation was induced and remained untreated for another 8 mins. Before initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, animals were randomly assigned to either receive active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus a sham impedance threshold device (control group, n = 15), or active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus an active impedance threshold device (experimental group, n = 15). Electrical defibrillation was attempted every 2 mins until return of spontaneous circulation or asystole. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Return of spontaneous circulation was observed in six (40%) animals treated with the sham valve and 14 (93.3%) animals treated with the active valve (p = .005, odds ratio 21.0, 95% confidence interval 2.16-204.6). Neuron-specific enolase and S-100 levels increased in the ensuing 4 hrs post resuscitation in both groups, but they were significantly elevated in animals treated with the sham valve (p < .01). At 48 hrs, neurologic alertness score was significantly better in animals treated with the active valve (79.1 ± 18.7 vs. 50 ± 10, p < .05) and was strongly negatively correlated with 1- and 4-hr postresuscitation neuron-specific enolase (r = -.86, p < .001 and r = -.87, p < .001, respectively) and S-100 (r = -.77, p < .001 and r = -0.8, p = .001) values. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of asphyxial cardiac arrest, intermittent airway occlusion with the impedance threshold device during the decompression phase of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation significantly improved hemodynamic parameters, 24- and 48-hr survival, and neurologic outcome evaluated both with clinical and biochemical parameters (neuron-specific enolase, S-100). Copyright © 2012 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Karlis G.,Sismanoglio General Hospital |
Iacovidou N.,Hellenic Society of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation |
Iacovidou N.,National and Kapodistrian University of Athens |
Lelovas P.,Hellenic Society of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation |
And 7 more authors.
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy | Year: 2015
Purpose: The purpose of the experiment was to compare the effects of nifekalant and amiodarone on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival, as well as on the hemodynamic parameters in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). Methods: After 8 min of untreated VF, bolus doses of epinephrine (adrenaline) and either nifekalant, or amiodarone, or saline (n = 10 per group), were administered after randomization. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was commenced immediately after drug administration and defibrillation was attempted 2 min later. CPR was resumed for another 2 min after each defibrillation attempt and the same dose of adrenaline was given every 4th minute during CPR. Results: Forty-eight hour survival was significantly higher with nifekalant compared to amiodarone (p < 0.001) and saline (p = 0.02), (9/10 vs. 0/10 vs. 3/10, respectively). Systolic aortic pressure, diastolic aortic pressure and coronary perfusion pressure were significantly higher with nifekalant during CPR and immediate post-resuscitation period (p < 0.05). The animals in the amiodarone group had a slower heart rate at the 1st and 45th min post-ROSC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). The number of electric shocks required for terminating VF, time to ROSC and adrenaline dose were significantly higher with amiodarone compared to nifekalant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Nifekalant showed a more favorable hemodynamic profile and improved survival compared to amiodarone and saline in this swine model. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.