Paques BV

Balk, Netherlands

Paques BV

Balk, Netherlands
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

Gildemyn S.,Ghent University | Rozendal R.A.,Paques BV | Rabaey K.,Ghent University
Trends in Biotechnology | Year: 2017

The use of microbial catalysts for electrode reactions enables novel bioremediation and bioproduction processes. To understand the electrochemical performance of the electrode reactions, knowledge of their thermodynamics is essential. We elaborate here on the Growth Reference System (GRS), simplifying thermodynamic calculations in the aforementioned context to, for example, demonstrate that cathodic bioprocesses generally suffer from higher overpotentials than do anodic processes. Abiotic hydrogen production cannot be thermodynamically excluded for any of the cathodic microbial electrosynthesis processes described thus far. Predictions for maximum biomass production correlated to electron flow are in line with experimental observations. We include a comprehensive set of thermodynamic and electrochemical data to support calculations relevant to the field of microbial electrocatalysis. Microbial electrocatalysts have the ability to use a solid electron donor or acceptor. This ability is exploited in bioelectrochemical systems, which are being increasingly developed for biotechnological applications, such as bioremediation and bioproduction.The thermodynamics of the processes (input versus output) are rarely studied because the calculations are regarded as too difficult.To gain insight into these processes, the electrode reactions should not be considered as a black box. We need to understand reaction thermodynamics to evaluate to what extent reactions can be steered towards the desired outcome. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd.


Hu Z.,Radboud University Nijmegen | Lotti T.,Technical University of Delft | de Kreuk M.,Waterschap Hollandse Delta | de Kreuk M.,Technical University of Delft | And 6 more authors.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology | Year: 2013

Currently, nitritation-anammox (anaerobic ammonium oxidation) bioreactors are designed to treat wastewaters with high ammonium concentrations at mesophilic temperatures (25 to 40°C). The implementation of this technology at ambient temperatures for nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater following carbon removal may lead to more-sustainable technology with energy and cost savings. However, the application of nitritation-anammox bioreactors at low temperatures (characteristic of municipal wastewaters except in tropical and subtropical regions) has not yet been explored. To this end, a laboratory-scale (5-liter) nitritation-anammox sequencing batch reactor was adapted to 12°C in 10 days and operated for more than 300 days to investigate the feasibility of nitrogen removal from synthetic pretreated municipal wastewater by the combination of aerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and anammox. The activities of both anammox and AOB were high enough to remove more than 90% of the supplied nitrogen. Multiple aspects, including the presence and activity of anammox, AOB, and aerobic nitrite oxidizers (NOB) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emission, were monitored to evaluate the stability of the bioreactor at 12°C. There was no nitrite accumulation throughout the operational period, indicating that anammox bacteria were active at 12°C and that AOB and anammox bacteria outcompeted NOB. Moreover, our results showed that sludge from wastewater treatment plants designed for treating high-ammonium-load wastewaters can be used as seeding sludge for wastewater treatment plants aimed at treating municipal wastewater that has a low temperature and low ammonium concentrations. © 2013, American Society for Microbiology.


Grant
Agency: European Commission | Branch: FP7 | Program: CP-TP | Phase: KBBE.2012.3.4-02 | Award Amount: 12.10M | Year: 2012

The 4-year SPLASH project will develop a new biobased industrial platform using microalgae as a renewable raw material for the sustainable production and recovery of hydrocarbons and (exo)polysaccharides from the species Botryococcus braunii and further conversion to renewable polymers. The project comprises 20 partners of which 40% SME and several large corporates plus universities and research institutes. Two bioproduction platforms will be explored: (1) green alga Botryococcus braunii on its own and (2) the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, to which the unique hydrocarbon and polysaccharides producing genes from Botryococcus will be transferred. SPLASH will deliver knowledge, tools and technologies needed for the establishment of a new industry sector: Industrial Biotechnology with algae and/or algal genes for the manufacture of polyesters and polyolefins. The building blocks for these polymers will be derived from the sugars (polyesters) and hydrocarbons (polyolefins) exuded by the algae: adipic acid from galactose, 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid from glucose, rhamnose and fucose, 1,4-pentanediol from rhamnose and fucose, ethylene from green naphtha, propylene from green naphtha. The conversion of ethylene and propylene to polyolefins is common technology, and will not be included in the project. The sugar-derived building blocks will be converted to new condensation polymers, including poly(ethylene 2,5-furandioate) (PEF) and poly(1,4-pentylene adipate-co-2,5-furandioate). End-use applications include food packaging materials and fibres for yarns, ropes and nets. The project encompasses (1) development of Botryococcus as an industrial production platform, (2) Systems biology analysis, (3) Development of procedures for production, in situ extraction and isolation, (4) product development.


This report studies Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering  Aecom  BASF SE  Aquatech  Atkins  Black & Veatch  Ch2m  Degremont Industry  Dow Water & Process  Evoqua Water Techno  GE Water & Process Technologies  IDE Technologies  Kurita Water Industries Ltd.  Louis Berger  Mott Macdonald  Organo  Ovivo  Paques  Remondis Aqua  Schlumberger  Suez Environnement  Tetra Tech Inc.  Veolia Water Technologies  REHAU  Alfa Laval  Berghof  Toray  Mak Water Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  North America  Europe  China  Japan  Southeast Asia  India  Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Microfiltration(MF)  Ultrafiltration (UF)  Nanofiltration(NF)  Reverse Osmosis  Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) in each application, can be divided into  Healthcare  Energy  Industrial  Food and Beverage  Others Global Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Market Research Report 2016  1 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Market Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT)  1.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Segment by Type  1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) by Type in 2015  1.2.2 Microfiltration(MF)  1.2.3 Ultrafiltration (UF)  1.2.4 Nanofiltration(NF)  1.2.5 Reverse Osmosis  1.3 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Segment by Application  1.3.1 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015  1.3.2 Healthcare  1.3.3 Energy  1.3.4 Industrial  1.3.5 Food and Beverage  1.3.6 Others  1.4 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Market by Region  1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) (2011-2021) 7 Global Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis  7.1 Aecom  7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.1.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.1.2.1 Type I  7.1.2.2 Type II  7.1.3 Aecom Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.2 BASF SE  7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.2.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.2.2.1 Type I  7.2.2.2 Type II  7.2.3 BASF SE Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.3 Aquatech  7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.3.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.3.2.1 Type I  7.3.2.2 Type II  7.3.3 Aquatech Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.4 Atkins  7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.4.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.4.2.1 Type I  7.4.2.2 Type II  7.4.3 Atkins Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.5 Black & Veatch  7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.5.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.5.2.1 Type I  7.5.2.2 Type II  7.5.3 Black & Veatch Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.6 Ch2m  7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.6.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.6.2.1 Type I  7.6.2.2 Type II  7.6.3 Ch2m Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.7 Degremont Industry  7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.7.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.7.2.1 Type I  7.7.2.2 Type II  7.7.3 Degremont Industry Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.8 Dow Water & Process  7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.8.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.8.2.1 Type I  7.8.2.2 Type II  7.8.3 Dow Water & Process Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.9 Evoqua Water Techno  7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.9.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.9.2.1 Type I  7.9.2.2 Type II  7.9.3 Evoqua Water Techno Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.10 GE Water & Process Technologies  7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors  7.10.2 Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Product Type, Application and Specification  7.10.2.1 Type I  7.10.2.2 Type II  7.10.3 GE Water & Process Technologies Membrane Waste Water Treatment (WWT) Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)  7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.11 IDE Technologies  7.12 Kurita Water Industries Ltd.  7.13 Louis Berger  7.14 Mott Macdonald  7.15 Organo  7.16 Ovivo  7.17 Paques  7.18 Remondis Aqua  7.19 Schlumberger  7.20 Suez Environnement  7.21 Tetra Tech Inc.  7.22 Veolia Water Technologies  7.23 REHAU  7.24 Alfa Laval  7.25 Berghof  7.26 Toray  7.27 Mak Water


Silva V.,Institute for Sustainable Process Technology | Poiesz E.,Cosun Food Technology Center | Van Der Heijden P.,Paques BV
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry | Year: 2013

Industrial processes usually generate streams enriched with high organic and inorganic components. Due to the complexity of these streams sometimes it is not quite straightforward to predict the performance of desalination technologies. Some technologies are available for the selective removal of salts from aqueous stream, but in general these technologies are applied in high value applications where salts are either the product or limit further purification of the final product is required. These technologies are, however, not widely used in low value applications like wastewater treatment. The aim of this article is to review, improve and perform the design of electrodialysis processes for relevant industrial wastewater applications. It is focused on the determination of the critical design parameters like membrane resistance, current efficiency and limiting current density through lab scale experiments and its further use for industrial scale first approximation design. In this article, the basic equations for design are reviewed and a practical approach to obtain the number of stacks required for a certain separation is introduced. An industrial wastewater stream has been used for lab batch experiment and its following continuous plant design. The results show that it is possible to separate monovalent ions in a high rate (more than 70 %) and divalent ions were less separated (less than 50 %). The energy required for the particular case was evaluated in a range from 6 to 11 kWh/m3 of feed stream depending on the water reclamation rate. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.


Dudeney A.W.L.,Imperial College London | Chan B.K.C.,Zijin Mining and Metallurgy Research Institute | Bouzalakos S.,Consulting Earth Scientists Pty Ltd | Huisman J.L.,Paques BV
International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment | Year: 2013

The management of solid waste and water generated by leaching metals from sulphides, particularly base metal and refractory gold ores and flotation concentrates, is reviewed. The work is set in the context of mineral waste and water management more generally in order to highlight similarities and interdependencies in the operation of mineral dumps, tailings dams and constructed wetlands under regulation, in conjunction with optimum water recycle/treatment and void backfill. Combined use of hydrometallurgical and related mineral wastes with wastes from other industries yielding practical bulk products, is also considered as a potential integrated route towards sustainability in mineral and metal production. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.


Kleerebezem R.,Technical University of Delft | Joosse B.,Technical University of Delft | Rozendal R.,Paques BV | Van Loosdrecht M.C.M.,Technical University of Delft
Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology | Year: 2015

Anaerobic digestion for the production of methane containing biogas is the classic example of a resource recovery process that combines stabilization of particulate organic matter or wastewater treatment with the production of a valuable end-product. Attractive features of the process include the production of a single end-product from a heterogeneous feedstock, and in-situ product separation of the gaseous end-product. Despite these intrinsic attractive properties of the process, the economic added value of the biogas produced is limited, enabling the development of alternative processes that yield higher-value end-products. Typically the production of higher value end-products from low value feedstock and industrial wastewater proceeds via intermediate production of organic acids (and carbon dioxide and molecular hydrogen). Optimization of organic acid production from particulate feedstocks and wastewater for development of the organic acid based resource recovery route receives significant research attention. The organic acid stream generated as such, has no economic value, but if organic acids can either be concentrated via membrane separation or (bio)converted to an end-product that can easily be separated from the liquid, an attractive biomass processing scheme can be developed. Attractive end-products of organic acid processing include polyhydroxyalkanoates, medium chain length fatty acids, or other organic molecules using bio-electrochemical systems. Overall we suggest that these novel bioprocessing routes for conversion of low value feedstock to higher added value products will contribute to a sustainable future and will change the economic status of organic waste. © 2015, The Author(s).


Jiang Y.,Technical University of Delft | Marang L.,Technical University of Delft | Tamis J.,Technical University of Delft | van Loosdrecht M.C.M.,Technical University of Delft | And 2 more authors.
Water Research | Year: 2012

In this study we investigated the feasibility of producing polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) by microbial enrichments on paper mill wastewater. The complete process includes (1) paper mill wastewater acidogenic fermentation in a simple batch process, (2) enrichment of a PHA-producing microbial community in a selector operated in sequencing batch mode with feast-famine regime, (3) Cellular PHA content maximization of the enrichment in an accumulator in fed-batch mode. The selective pressure required to establish a PHA-producing microbial enrichment, as derived from our previous research on synthetic medium, was validated using an agro-industrial waste stream in this study. The microbial enrichment obtained could accumulate maximum up to 77% PHA of cell dry weight within 5 h, which is currently the best result obtained on real agro-industrial waste streams, especially in terms of biomass specific efficiency. Biomass in this enrichment included both Plasticicumulans acidivorans, which was the main PHA producer, and a flanking population, which exhibited limited PHA-producing capacity. The fraction of P. acidivorans in the biomass was largely dependent on the fraction of volatile fatty acids in the total soluble COD in the wastewater after acidification. Based on this observation, one simple equation was proposed for predicting the PHA storage capacity of the enrichment. Moreover, some crucial bottlenecks that may impede the successful scaling-up of the process are discussed. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.


Sorokin D.Y.,Technical University of Delft | Abbas B.,Technical University of Delft | Van Zessen E.,Paques B.V. | Muyzer G.,University of Amsterdam
FEMS Microbiology Letters | Year: 2014

Molecular and microbiological analysis of a laboratory bioreactor biomass oxidizing thiocyanate at autotrophic conditions and at 1 M NaCl showed a domination of a single chemolithoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium (SOB) capable of using thiocyanate as an energy source. The bacterium was isolated in pure cultures and identified as a member of the Halothiobacillus halophilus/hydrothermalis clade. This clade includes moderately halophilic chemolithoautotrophic SOB from marine and hypersaline habitats for which the ability to utilize thiocyanate as an electron donor has not been previously demonstrated. Halothiobacillus sp. strain SCN-R1 grew with thiocyanate as the sole energy and nitrogen source oxidizing it to sulfate and ammonium via the cyanate pathway. The pH range for thiocyanate oxidation was within a neutral region between 7 and 8 and the range of salinity was from 0.2 to 1.5 M NaCl, with an optimum at 0.5 M. Despite the close phylogenetic relatedness, none of the tested type strains and other isolates from the H. halophilus/hydrothermalis group exhibited thiocyanate-oxidizing capacity. A halophilic bacterium belonging to the genus Halothiobacillus able to grow with thiocyanate as energy source was discovered in a bioreactor. © 2014 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.


News Article | December 2, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

MarketStudyReport.com adds “2017 Top 5 Anaerobic Digester Manufacturers in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa" new report to its research database. The report spread across 122 pages with table and figures in it. This report studies Anaerobic Digester in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa, focuses on the top 5 Anaerobic Digester Players in each region, with sales, price, revenue and market share for top 5 manufacturer, covering Paques Veolia GE Water & Process Technologies Purac Bossco Environmental Protection Technology Shandong Meiquan Degremont ADI Systems Voith Best Environmental Technology Browse full table of contents and data tables at  https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/2017-top-5-anaerobic-digester-manufacturers-in-north-america-europe-asia-pacific-south-america-middle-east-and-africa/ Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales, revenue, market share of top 5 players in these regions, from 2012 to 2017 (forecast), like North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India and Korea) Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy and Russia etc. South America (Brazil, Chile, Peru and Argentina) Middle East and Africa (Egypt, South Africa, Saudi Arabia) Split by Product Types, with sales, revenue, price, market share of each type, can be divided into Up flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) Internal circulation reactor(IC reactor) Expanded granular sludge bed digestion (EGSB) Others Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Anaerobic Digester in each application, can be divided into Paper Industry Food & Beverage Industry Chemical Industry Others 9 Global Anaerobic Digester Players Profiles/Analysis 9.1 Paques 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.1.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 Type 1 9.1.2.2 Type 2 9.1.3 Paques Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Veolia 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.2.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 Type 1 9.2.2.2 Type 2 9.2.3 Veolia Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 GE Water & Process Technologies 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.3.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 Type 1 9.3.2.2 Type 2 9.3.3 GE Water & Process Technologies Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 Purac 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.4.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 Type 1 9.4.2.2 Type 2 9.4.3 Purac Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Bossco Environmental Protection Technology 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.5.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 Type 1 9.5.2.2 Type 2 9.5.3 Bossco Environmental Protection Technology Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Shandong Meiquan 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.6.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 Type 1 9.6.2.2 Type 2 9.6.3 Shandong Meiquan Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 Degremont 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.7.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 Type 1 9.7.2.2 Type 2 9.7.3 Degremont Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 ADI Systems 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.8.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 Type 1 9.8.2.2 Type 2 9.8.3 ADI Systems Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.9 Voith 9.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.9.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.9.2.1 Type 1 9.9.2.2 Type 2 9.9.3 Voith Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.10 Best Environmental Technology 9.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 9.10.2 Anaerobic Digester Product Types, Application and Specification 9.10.2.1 Type 1 9.10.2.2 Type 2 9.10.3 Best Environmental Technology Anaerobic Digester Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 9.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview To receive personalized assistance write to us @ [email protected] with the report title in the subject line along with your questions or call us at +1 866-764-2150

Loading Paques BV collaborators
Loading Paques BV collaborators