Larkin J.M.G.,Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust |
Ferguson T.R.,Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust |
Pickering L.M.,Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust |
Edmonds K.,Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust |
And 6 more authors.
British Journal of Cancer | Year: 2010
BACKGROUND: There is clinical evidence to suggest that tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) may be a therapeutic target in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Multi-targeted kinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib and sunitinib, have become standard of care in advanced RCC. The anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody infliximab and sorafenib have differing cellular mechanisms of action. We conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of infliximab in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced RCC.METHODS: Eligible patients were systemic treatment-naive or had received previous cytokine therapy only. Sorafenib and infliximab were administered according to standard schedules. The study had two phases: in phase I, the safety and toxicity of the combination of full-dose sorafenib and two dose levels of infliximab were evaluated in three and three patients, respectively, and in phase II, further safety, toxicity and efficacy data were collected in an expanded patient population.RESULTS: Acceptable safety was reported for the first three patients (infliximab 5 mg kg -1) in phase 1. Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and infliximab 10 mg kg -1 were administered to a total of 13 patients (three in phase 1 and 10 in phase 2). Adverse events included grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (31%), rash (25%), fatigue (19%) and infection (19%). Although manageable, toxicity resulted in 75% of the patients requiring at least one dose reduction and 81% requiring at least one dose delay of sorafenib. Four patients were progression-free at 6 months (PFS 6 31%); median PFS and overall survival were 6 and 14 months, respectively.CONCLUSION: Sorafenib and infliximab can be administered in combination, but a significant increase in the numbers of adverse events requiring dose adjustments of sorafenib was observed. There was no evidence of increased efficacy compared with sorafenib alone in advanced RCC. The combination of sorafenib and infliximab does not warrant further evaluation in patients with advanced RCC. © 2010 Cancer Research UK.
Rysman E.,Catholic University of Leuven |
Brusselmans K.,Catholic University of Leuven |
Scheys K.,Catholic University of Leuven |
Timmermans L.,Catholic University of Leuven |
And 11 more authors.
Cancer Research | Year: 2010
Activation of de novo lipogenesis in cancer cells is increasingly recognized as a hallmark of aggressive cancers and has been implicated in the production of membranes for rapid cell proliferation. In the current report, we provide evidence that this activation has a more profound role. Using a mass spectrometry - based phospholipid analysis approach, we show that clinical tumor tissues that display the lipogenic phenotype show an increase in the degree of lipid saturation compared with nonlipogenic tumors. Reversal of the lipogenic switch in cancer cells by treatment with the lipogenesis inhibitor soraphen A or by targeting lipogenic enzymes with small interfering RNA leads to a marked decrease in saturated and mono-unsaturated phospholipid species and increases the relative degree of polyunsaturation. Because polyunsaturated acyl chains are more susceptible to peroxidation, inhibition of lipogenesis increases the levels of peroxidation end products and renders cells more susceptible to oxidative stress - induced cell death. As saturated lipids pack more densely, modulation of lipogenesis also alters lateral and transversal membrane dynamics as revealed by diffusion of membrane-targeted green fluorescent protein and by the uptake and response to doxorubicin. These data show that shifting lipid acquisition from lipid uptake toward de novo lipogenesis dramatically changes membrane properties and protects cells from both endogenous and exogenous insults. These findings provide important new insights into the role of de novo lipogenesis in cancer cells, and they provide a rationale for the use of lipogenesis inhibitors as antineoplastic agents and as chemotherapeutic sensitizers. ©2010 AACR.
Kojima K.,University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center |
Burks J.K.,University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center |
Arts J.,Ortho Biotech Oncology Research and Development |
Andreeff M.,University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | Year: 2010
The development of small-molecule activators of p53 is currently focused on malignancies containing a wild-type p53 genotype, which is present in most leukemias. JNJ-26854165 is one such p53-activating agent, but its mechanism of action remains to be elucidated. Here, we report the effects of JNJ-26854165 in acute leukemias. JNJ-26854165 treatment induced p53-mediated apoptosis in acute leukemia cells with wild-type p53, in which p53 rapidly drives transcription-independent apoptosis followed by activation of a transcription-dependent pathway. JNJ-26854165 accelerated the proteasome-mediated degradation of p21 and antagonized the transcriptional induction of p21 by p53. Interestingly, JNJ-26854165 induced S-phase delay and upregulated E2F1 expression in p53 mutant cells, resulting in apoptosis preferentially of S-phase cells. E2F1 knockdown blocked apoptosis induced by JNJ-26854165 in p53 mutant cells. Apoptotic activity of JNJ-26854165 against primary acute leukemia cells was maintained in leukemia/stroma cocultures, unlike doxorubicin, which has reduced cytrotoxicity in coculture systems. JNJ-26854165 synergizes with 1-β-arabinofuranosylcytosine or doxorubicin to induce p53-mediated apoptosis. Our data suggest that JNJ-26854165 may provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of acute leukemias. The presence of p53-independent apoptotic activity in addition to p53-mediated apoptosis induction, if operational in vivo, may prevent the selection of p53 mutant subclones during therapy. ©2010 AACR.
Cepero V.,University of Turin |
Cepero V.,Ontario Cancer Institute |
Sierra J.R.,University of Turin |
Sierra J.R.,Ontario Cancer Institute |
And 6 more authors.
Cancer Research | Year: 2010
The establishment of the role of MET in human cancer has led to the development of small-molecule inhibitors, many of which are currently in clinical trials. Thus far, nothing is known about their therapeutic efficacy and the possible emergence of resistance to treatment, a problem that has been often observed with other receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors. To predict mechanisms of acquired resistance, we generated resistant cells by treating MET-addicted cells with increasing concentrations of the MET small-molecule inhibitors PHA-665752 or JNJ38877605. Resistant cells displayed MET gene amplification, leading to increased expression and constitutive phosphorylation of MET, followed by subsequent amplification and overexpression of wild-type (wt) KRAS. Cells harboring KRAS amplification progressively lost their MET dependence and acquired KRAS dependence. Our results suggest that MET and KRAS amplification is a general mechanism of resistance to specific MET inhibitors given that similar results were observed with two small inhibitors and in different cell lines of different histotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that overexpression of wt KRAS can overcome the inhibitory effect of a RTK inhibitor. In view of the fact that cellular models of resistance to inhibitors targeting other tyrosine kinases have predicted and corroborated clinical findings, our results provide insights into strategies for preventing and/or overcoming drug resistance. ©2010 AACR.
Huang H.,U.S. National Cancer Institute |
Huang H.,Kaiser Permanente |
Menefee M.,U.S. National Cancer Institute |
Menefee M.,Mayo Medical School |
And 8 more authors.
Clinical Cancer Research | Year: 2010
Purpose: Ixabepilone (Ixempra; BMS-247550) is an epothilone B analog and nontaxane microtubule-stabilizing compound with clinical activity in a range of solid tumors. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Experimental Design: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had measurable disease and had not received previous cytotoxic or targeted therapy were treated with 6 mg/m2 ixabepilone i.v. daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Levels of Glu-terminated and acetylated tubulin, markers of microtubule stabilization, were assessed by Western blot. VHL gene mutation status was determined by sequencing. Results: Eighty-seven patients received a total of 590 cycles, with a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-29). The overall response rate was 13% (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor). One patient had a complete response, 10 patients had partial responses, and 59 patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 5.5 months. The median overall survival of renal cell carcinoma Motzer grade 0 and 1 patients with clear cell histology was 19.25 months. Treatment-related adverse events were primarily alopecia, gastrointestinal toxicity, neuropathy, and fatigue. Biopsies were done at baseline and after five doses of ixabepilone. Microtubule target engagement was achieved in 84.6% to 92.3% of patients evaluated. No correlation was identified between the target engagement, VHL gene mutation status, and clinical response. Conclusion: Ixabepilone can cause tumor regression in some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and could be considered in combination regimens with other therapies. ©2010 AACR.