Time filter

Source Type

Holt R.I.G.,University of Southampton | Nicolucci A.,Consorzio Mario Negri Sud | Kovacs Burns K.,University of Alberta | Escalante M.,University of Guadalajara | And 11 more authors.
Diabetic Medicine | Year: 2013

Aims: The second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study sought cross-national comparisons of perceptions on healthcare provision for benchmarking and sharing of clinical practices to improve diabetes care. Methods: In total, 4785 healthcare professionals caring for people with diabetes across 17 countries participated in an online survey designed to assess diabetes healthcare provision, self-management and training. Results: Between 61.4 and 92.9% of healthcare professionals felt that people with diabetes needed to improve various self-management activities; glucose monitoring (range, 29.3-92.1%) had the biggest country difference, with a between-country variance of 20%. The need for a major improvement in diabetes self-management education was reported by 60% (26.4-81.4%) of healthcare professionals, with a 12% between-country variance. Provision of diabetes services differed among countries, with many healthcare professionals indicating that major improvements were needed across a range of areas, including healthcare organization [30.6% (7.4-67.1%)], resources for diabetes prevention [78.8% (60.4-90.5%)], earlier diagnosis and treatment [67.9% (45.0-85.5%)], communication between team members and people with diabetes [56.1% (22.3-85.4%)], specialist nurse availability [63.8% (27.9-90.7%)] and psychological support [62.7% (40.6-79.6%)]. In some countries, up to one third of healthcare professionals reported not having received any formal diabetes training. Societal discrimination against people with diabetes was reported by 32.8% (11.4-79.6%) of participants. Conclusions: This survey has highlighted concerns of healthcare professionals relating to diabetes healthcare provision, self-management and training. Identifying between-country differences in several areas will allow benchmarking and sharing of clinical practices. © 2013 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2013 Diabetes UK.

Belaya Z.E.,National Research Center for Endocrinology | Rozhinskaya L.Y.,National Research Center for Endocrinology | Melnichenko G.A.,National Research Center for Endocrinology | Solodovnikov A.G.,Ural State Medical Academy | And 4 more authors.
Osteoporosis International | Year: 2013

Patients with endogenous hypercortisolism have higher sclerostin, but do not differ in Dickkopf 1 (Dkk1) or secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) levels as compared to healthy control. Introduction: Endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS), usually affecting young and otherwise healthy patients, is a good model to validate the effects of supraphysiological levels of glucocorticoids in humans. This study evaluates circulating levels of extracellular antagonists of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (sclerostin, Dkk1, SFRP1) in patients with CS versus healthy individuals. Methods: Forty patients with clinically and biochemically evident CS and 40 sex-, age-, and body mass index-matched healthy subjects provided fasting serum samples for sclerostin, SFRP1 and Dkk1, along with bone turnover markers. Results: Patients with CS had higher sclerostin levels (34.5 (30.3-37.1) pmol/L) versus healthy individuals (29.9 (24.3-36.8) pmol/L) (p = 0.032). Differences in sclerostin were due to the lack of lower sclerostin values rather than an increase in protein levels above the upper limits of the healthy control. The odds of sclerostin levels being higher than 30 pmol/L were greater in patients with CS as compared with the odds in healthy subjects (odds ratio = 3.81 95 % confidence interval 1.45-10.02) (p = 0.01). It coexisted with suppressed bone formation and unchanged bone resorption markers. Dkk1, SFRP1 did not differ from the control group. Conclusions: Of all the tested proteins (sclerostin, Dkk1, SFRP1), only sclerostin showed a significant difference when contrasting CS with healthy subjects. Hypercortisolism might prevent the down-regulation of sclerostin. Targeting sclerostin seems to be a promising therapeutic approach to treating osteoporosis in patients with CS. © 2013 International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Belaya Z.E.,National Research Center for Endocrinology | Iljin A.V.,National Research Center for Endocrinology | Melnichenko G.A.,National Research Center for Endocrinology | Rozhinskaya L.Y.,National Research Center for Endocrinology | And 5 more authors.
Endocrine | Year: 2012

This study estimates diagnostic performance of late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) as measured by automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), evaluates the clinical implication of two consecutive LNSC measurements, and compares its accuracy with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serum cortisol after low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in obese and overweight patients referred for suspected Cushing's syndrome (CS). One hundred twenty three consecutive obese and overweight referred patients and 98 healthy volunteers provided two saliva samples collected at 23:00 using a Salivette (Sarstedt, Germany), assayed by ECLIA (Cobas e601) and ELISA. The patients underwent DST and were further evaluated until CS was pathologically confirmed (n = 45) or excluded. Diagnostic performance of LNSC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The total areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated to compare the different tests. We found that a cut-off value of 9.4 nmol/l can differentiate CS among obese and overweight patients with sensitivity of 84.4 % (95% CI 71.2-92.2), specificity of 92.3 % (95% CI 84.2-96.4), and diagnostic odds ratio of 65.1 (95% CI 20.4-207.6). No difference was found between AUCs from the first, second, and the mean from the two LNSC measurements (ECLIA), LNSC (ELISA), or DST. The single LNSC (ECLIA) and DST improved the sensitivity and specificity for concordant results up to 100 and 97.4 %, respectively. In conclusion, due to its automation and its comparable diagnostic performance, ECLIA is preferable as a first-line LNSC screening test for CS. The initial use of single LNSC followed by DST provides better diagnostic performance for concordant results. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.

Loading National Research Center for Endocrinology collaborators
Loading National Research Center for Endocrinology collaborators