Naestved Hospital Naestved

Næstved, Denmark

Naestved Hospital Naestved

Næstved, Denmark
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

PubMed | Naestved Hospital Naestved and Copenhagen University
Type: | Journal: Frontiers in physiology | Year: 2014

During caesarean section spinal anesthesia may provoke maternal hypotension that we prevent by administration of phenylephrine and/or ephedrine. Phenylephrine is however reported to reduce the near infrared spectroscopy-determined frontal lobe oxygenation (ScO2) but whether that is the case for patients exposed to spinal anesthesia is not known.To evaluate the impact of phenylephrine vs. ephedrine on ScO2during caesarean section with spinal anesthesia in a single center, open-label parallel-group study with balanced randomization of 24 women (1:1). Secondary aims were to compare the effect of the two drugs on maternal hemodynamics and fetal heart rate.Ephedrine (0.8-3.3 mg/min) vs. phenylephrine infusion (0.02-0.07 mg/min).For the duration of surgery, administration of ephedrine maintained ScO2 (compared to baseline +2.1 2.8%; mean SE, while phenylephrine reduced ScO2 (-8.6 2.8%; p = 0.005) with a 10.7% difference in ScO2between groups (p = 0.0106). Also maternal heart rate was maintained with ephedrine (+3 3 bpm) but decreased with phenylephrine (-11 3 bpm); difference 14 bpm (p = 0.0053), but no significant difference in mean arterial pressure (p = 0.1904) or CO (p = 0.0683) was observed between groups. The two drugs also elicited an equal increase in fetal heart rate (by 19 3 vs. 18 3 bpm; p = 0.744).In the choice between phenylephrine and ephedrine for maintenance of blood pressure during caesarean section with spinal anesthesia, ephedrine maintains frontal lobe oxygenation and maternal heart rate with a similar increase in fetal heart rate as elicited by phenylephrine.Clinical trials NCT 01509521 and EudraCT 2001 006103 35.

Loading Naestved Hospital Naestved collaborators
Loading Naestved Hospital Naestved collaborators