Walnut Creek, CA, United States
Walnut Creek, CA, United States

Time filter

Source Type

News Article | May 11, 2017
Site: www.marketwired.com

EDMONTON, ALBERTA and NEW YORK, NEW YORK--(Marketwired - May 11, 2017) - Stantec (TSX:STN)(NYSE:STN) achieved good operating results in the first quarter of 2017, with a 69.0% increase in gross revenue compared to the first quarter of 2016. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) rose 35.0%, while adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) remained stable at $0.40 quarter over quarter. Growth was led by acquisitions completed in 2016 and organic growth in the Water and Infrastructure business operating units, which together make up nearly 50% of the Company's gross revenue. Operations in the United States also experienced organic growth. Overall organic revenue is trending in a positive direction, with retraction decreasing from 4.4% in the fourth quarter of 2016 to 2.4% in the first quarter of 2017. Also positively impacting results was an increase in gross margin--from 53.9% in Q1 16 to 54.1% in Q1 17--mainly due to the mix of projects acquired from MWH Global, Inc. (MWH). Stantec's revenue growth was partly offset by organic gross revenue retraction in some business operating units and the impact of foreign exchange. "Stantec had a good quarter. Our operating results show that the Company is moving in a positive direction," says president and chief executive officer, Bob Gomes. "Our recent acquisitions are already contributing significantly to growth, organic gross revenue growth is up for both our Water and Infrastructure operations, and overall organic growth is trending in the right direction as the rate of retraction decreases. We're also pleased by the strategic divestiture of our water software company, Innovyze. Now both companies can continue to prosper with the best available resources, and we have an opportunity to reduce debt." The sale of Innovyze, Inc. (Innovyze) results in a significant reduction in goodwill and debt, but the low tax base of this asset acquired from MWH created a high tax liability that will impact Stantec's year-to-date results in 2017. Because of the accounting method required to account for this strategic divestiture, Stantec had a net loss of $58.0 million in the quarter and a diluted loss per share of $0.51. A detailed explanation of this transaction is provided below under "Subsequent Event." Stantec's Infrastructure business operating unit experienced organic gross revenue growth of 2.3% over the first quarter of 2016 due to strong organic growth in the US transportation sector and stability in Canadian transportation activities. Compared to the first quarter of 2016, the Water business operating unit experienced 2.2% organic revenue growth, with organic growth occurring in both Canada and the United States. The Environmental Services business operating unit had stable organic revenue in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016. The Company's Buildings business operating unit experienced organic revenue retraction of 6.8% in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016, which was a very robust quarter for Buildings. Strong organic growth in the United States was offset by retraction in Canadian and Global operations, primarily due to continued weakness in the oil and gas sector, which affected private and public spending in Canada and the Middle East. Also contributing to the retraction in Buildings was the number of large public-private partnership projects that have been awarded but will not contribute revenue until later in 2017. Stantec's Energy & Resources business operating unit experienced a 13.2% retraction in Q1 17 compared to Q1 16 due to the continued weakness in the oil and gas and mining sectors, though this retraction is at a reduced rate compared to 2016. During the quarter, the Company made substantial progress integrating MWH America's financial information and projects into Stantec's enterprise management system and harmonizing the policies and practices of MWH and Stantec. During the quarter, Stantec signed an agreement for the sale of its water software business, Innovyze, Inc. and subsidiaries, to the EQT Mid Market US fund. Innovyze joined Stantec as part of the MWH acquisition in 2016; subsequently, the Company determined that Innovyze did not add synergies to Stantec's core business. The sale of Innovyze closed on May 5, 2017, for gross proceeds of US$270 million (approximately $359 million), less working capital adjustments and assumed indebtedness. This strategic transaction will reduce an estimated $292 million of goodwill and intangible assets, pay down approximately $202 million of debt, and result in an estimated pre-tax accounting gain of $53 million. Because the Innovyze sale was probable in Q1 17, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, Stantec recorded a deferred tax liability and expense regarding the value of its net investment in Innovyze. Because of the timing of the sale, a deferred tax charge impacted net income by $90.4 million; this charge will be reversed in Q2 17 when the gain on sale is realized and a current tax provision is recorded. This deferred tax charge decreased diluted EPS by $0.79, resulting in a diluted loss per share of $0.51. Management believes EBITDA, adjusted net income, and adjusted EPS better reflect Stantec's operating performance. Also note that the deferred tax charge does not affect Stantec's liquidity, cash flows from operating activities, or debt covenants in the first quarter. The expected gain for tax purposes of approximately $344 million is higher than the accounting gain because the adjusted cost base (for tax purposes) of Innovyze is approximately $13 million and the fair value grew organically over time. The related net tax expense on the sale will be approximately $110 million. The table below summarizes the Q1 17 impact and estimated impact that this transaction, which straddles two quarters, will have on Stantec's Q2 17 and year-to-date results: On April 13, 2017, Stantec declared and paid a cash dividend of $0.1250 per share to shareholders of record. On May 10, 2017, the Company also declared a dividend of $0.1250 per share, payable on July 13, 2017, to shareholders of record as of June 30, 2017. As part of the Company's commitment to doing business that meets the needs of the present while contributing to an environmentally, socially, and economically viable future, Stantec recently published its 2016 Sustainability Report. Prepared in accordance with the internationally recognized Global Reporting Initiative's G4 framework, the report shares Stantec's ongoing commitment to social, environmental, and economic sustainability; addresses the Company's sustainability performance for fiscal year 2016; and outlines its forward-looking plans for 2017. It also fulfills Stantec's commitment to reporting on the United Nations Global Compact's 10 principles of sustainability and corporate citizenship. The report is available at stantec.com/about-us/sustainability.html. Stantec's first quarter conference call--to be held Thursday, May 11, at 2:00 PM MDT (4:00 PM EDT)--will be broadcast live and archived in the Investors section of stantec.com. Financial analysts wanting to participate in the earnings conference are invited to call 1-866-222-0265 and provide the operator with confirmation code 2887233. Stantec's Annual General Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Thursday, May 11, 2017, at 10:30 AM MDT (12:30 PM EDT) at Stantec Center, 10160 - 112 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta. We're active members of the communities we serve. That's why at Stantec, we always design with community in mind. The Stantec community unites approximately 22,000 employees working in over 400 locations across 6 continents. We collaborate across disciplines and industries to bring buildings, energy and resource, environmental, water, and infrastructure projects to life. Our work--engineering, architecture, interior design, landscape architecture, surveying, environmental sciences, construction services, project management, and project economics, from initial project concept and planning through to design, construction, commissioning, maintenance, decommissioning, and remediation--begins at the intersection of community, creativity, and client relationships. Our local strength, knowledge, and relationships, coupled with our world-class expertise, have allowed us to go anywhere to meet our clients' needs in more creative and personalized ways. With a long-term commitment to the people and places we serve, Stantec has the unique ability to connect to projects on a personal level and advance the quality of life in communities across the globe. Stantec trades on the TSX and the NYSE under the symbol STN. Visit us at stantec.com or find us on social media. Stantec's EBITDA, adjusted net income, and adjusted diluted earnings per share are non-IFRS measures. For a definition and explanation of non-IFRS measures, refer to the Critical Accounting Estimates, Developments, and Measures section of the Company's 2016 Annual Report and the Company's 2017 First Quarter Management's Discussion and Analysis. Certain statements contained in this news release constitute forward-looking statements. These statements include, but are not limited to, trends in organic revenue growth; anticipated revenue from future P3 projects, and the timing thereof; and the anticipated accounting treatment, use of proceeds, and accounting gains, transaction costs and tax liabilities associated with the Innovyze sale. Any such statements represent the views of management only as of the date hereof and are presented for the purpose of assisting the Company's shareholders in understanding Stantec's operations, objectives, priorities, and anticipated financial performance as at and for the periods ended on the dates presented, and may not be appropriate for other purposes. By their nature, forward-looking statements require us to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. We caution readers of this news release not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements since a number of factors could cause actual future results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, uncertainty regarding US tax reform; changing market conditions for Stantec's services; the risk that Stantec will not meet its growth or revenue targets; and the risk that the projects contemplated in this news release will not contribute significant revenue when expected or at all. Investors and the public should carefully consider these factors, other uncertainties, and potential events, as well as the inherent uncertainty of forward-looking statements, when relying on these statements to make decisions with respect to our Company. For more information about how other material risk factors could affect results, refer to the Risk Factors section and Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in our 2016 Annual Report and the 2017 First Quarter Management's Discussion and Analysis. Stantec's 40-F has been filed with the SEC, and you may obtain this document by visiting EDGAR on the SEC website at sec.gov. You may obtain our complete audited annual consolidated financial statements and associated Management's Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016 (which form our 2016 Annual Report) by visiting EDGAR on the SEC website at sec.gov, on the CSA website at sedar.com, or at stantec.com. Alternatively, you may obtain a printed copy of the 2016 Annual Report free of charge from our Investor Contact noted below. Continued, Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and Consolidated Statements of Income attached


News Article | May 18, 2017
Site: www.enr.com

For ENR’s Top 400 Contractors, the construction market is going strong and predictions of a leveling off or even a decline have been premature. While many in the industry now believe the market will remain healthy for the foreseeable future, large contractors in the big-ticket international oil-and-gas and mining markets did take another hit in 2016—although most are weathering that storm. Last year was a strong one for the Top 400, which  generated a record $366.41 billion in contracting revenue, an increase of 6.5% from 2015’s $344.14 billion. However, the real story is on the domestic side. Contracting revenue from U.S. projects rose a healthy 9.7%, to $322.83 billion, on top of a 9.5% rise in domestic revenue last year. On the other hand, non-U.S. contracting revenue plunged 12.5%, to $43.58 billion, in 2016, with the major declines noted in projects in the minerals-and-mining, petroleum and power sectors. Bechtel continued its Top 400 dominance, ranking No. 1 for the 19th consecutive year. However, the oil price slump and the soft minerals-and-mining sector had a significant impact on its markets. Despite this, Bechtel’s contracting revenue was up in 2016. “When the collapse in oil prices happened, people in the petroleum industry expected them to bounce back in a year. It didn’t happen. Now people are wondering if they will ever bounce back to where they were,” says Jack Futcher, named Bechtel chief operating officer last year. It is a different story in the U.S., Futcher says. Cheap feedstock from domestic gas and oil extraction has spurred development of petrochemical facilities and gas-fired power plants. He notes, for example, that Bechtel has designed and will soon break ground on Shell Chemical Appalachia petrochemicals complex, including an ethylene cracker and a polyethylene derivatives unit, near Pittsburgh. The complex will use low-cost ethane from shale gas producers in the Marcellus and Utica basins to produce 1.6 million annual tons of polyethylene. Many contractors in the oil-and-gas sector agree that oil prices will remain depressed as new extraction technologies have allowed more oil and gas reserves to be accessed. “We see oil prices lower for longer, with a slight uptick … to around $55-$60 per barrel,” says Graham Hill, executive vice president of KBR. He also says the center of production has shifted. “The U.S. is becoming the advantage feedstock nation of the world—the ‘new Saudi Arabia’ in downstream and the ‘new Qatar’ in midstream liquefied natural gas.” In the international market, Futcher also notes that low oil prices have propelled oil-producing nations in the Middle East to move away from reliance on oil revenue to maintain their economic strength. Cheap energy prices have spurred some countries in the region to move into aluminum smelting, in which Bechtel has significant construction expertise. Unlike design firms, there is less consolidation among contractors. The few contractor acquisitions of note in the past year include Burns & McDonnell’s buy of Appleton, Wis.-based industrial contractor AZCO Inc. in December. AZCO ranked No. 82 on last year’s ENR Top 600. “We did not have experience in direct-hire contracting that AZCO now provides us with,” says Ray Kowalik, Burns & McDonnell CEO. The biggest move on the Top 400 was the acquisition of U.S.-based MWH Global by Stantec, enabling the Canadian parent’s first appearance on the Top 400. Stantec CEO Bob Gomes says the move was spurred by customer demands for a more integrated approach to construction. It also gives Stantec a greater geographic range in the international market, he says. “AECOM has committed $250 million to help provide project financing through AECOM Capital.” —Dan McQuade, President for construction, AECOM AECOM, another firm known principally for design that broke into the contracting ranks a few years ago with its acquisitions of Tishman Construction, Hunt Construction and URS, now ranks No. 5 on the Top 400. “We are now fully integrated and are able to provide the full package of design-build and design-build-finance delivery,” says Dan McQuade, AECOM construction president. “Last year was one of tremendous growth on the contracting side,” McQuade says. He notes that the AECOM Tishman group is working on or has just completed seven buildings of at least $1 billion in size, and that the Hunt group is working on football stadiums for the Atlanta Falcons and Los Angeles Rams. The firm also won the job to decommission the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in Pendleton, Calif. A significant development has been the growth of many international firms in the U.S. market to take advantage of growing infrastructure investment. These include Spanish contractors Dragados, OHL and Ferrovial, France’s Colas, Italy’s Salini-Impregilo with its recent acquisition of Connecticut-based Lane Industries and China’s China Construction America, all of which are becoming major U.S. market players. “The competition from these companies is fierce, as they are showing up with big balance sheets,” says Richard Cavallaro, CEO of Skanska USA. “Ten years ago, we were one of the few foreign-owned contractors, but we had been here for decades.” There is a considerable concern among contractors about the ability of clients to obtain financing for projects. The U.S. Federal Reserve has begun raising interest rates at a modest pace, having an impact on the cost of borrowing. Further, banks are becoming a little edgy about how much of their lending portfolios is devoted to real estate. “One of the big reasons for that is that the banks don’t want to start lending when the policy that will dictate the market is still unknown, so it’s tough to get construction loans,” says Jeff Hoopes, CEO of Swinerton. He says banks are looking at other markets and different products to invest in, and that’s impacted business across the board. The reluctance of banks to commit to more real estate lending, particularly in the residential market, has caused developers to seek other means of financing. “Developers across the board tell us they are seeking out second- and third-tier lenders for financing arrangements. The exception appears to be the healthcare sector, which traditionally finances projects internally,” says Scott Thompson, senior vice president of Batson-Cook Co. “While some projects have been delayed because of tightening financing markets, other financial players—including real estate funds established by developers—have stepped up to pick up the slack,” adds Ken Colao, president of CNY Group. Cavallaro says the ability to arrange, or even participate, in project financing is a key to get many jobs off the ground. “Skanska has a major financing group that can help make things happen.” McQuade says that AECOM now is a major player in the move toward contractors assisting, or even contributing to, project financing. “AECOM has committed $250 million to help provide project financing through AECOM Capital.” McQuade says that about $1 billion in current AECOM projects are the result of AECOM Capital either helping to find financing, or actually contributing to the financial package. Donald Trump’s election as president last year has been a key market development, with many industry participants expecting a more pro-business climate, leading to greater opportunities. “In 2016, I thought we were in the late innings of the construction boom, but since November, a lot of people in the industry are more bullish that the market will continue to be strong,” says McQuade. He believes some market energy may be resulting from a lull in the run-up to the election, but he says peers now are more optimistic. However, many contractors are taking a wait-and-see attitude about the new administration, saying it will take from six to 18 months for the full impact of new policies to affect the industry. “I think the Trump effect will manifest itself more clearly in 2018. We have some concerns about immigration and foreign trade policies, as they relate to construction labor and materials pricing,” says Paul D. Little, CEO of Alston Construction. There are signs that pro-growth policies may benefit the industry. Bechtel’s Futcher says cutting corporate taxes may result in repatriating foreign profits of U.S. corporations in the form of capital investments here. And, “if the right policies are enacted, we hope to see an increase in foreign direct investment in the U.S.,” says Stephen Gray, CEO of Gray Construction. Shaun Yancey, president of U.S. operations at PCL Construction Enterprises, sums up the general attitude among contractors: “There is quite a bit of rhetoric around the construction industry, but we are still waiting on the administration. Although there is optimism about the future of our industry, there is quite a bit of uncertainty at this moment.” Many contractors in specific markets see potential headwinds as a result of the election. On the power side, firms in the renewables market want to know what will happen with investment tax credits. “We don’t know if Trump is going to basically eliminate those, and we’re still not sure if they’re going to get phased out in 2023 like they’re set up to, or get shut off next year,” says Hoopes of Swinerton. With some customer reluctance in the market, he is seeing a little bit of a slowdown in the solar market as people wait to see what’s going happen with Trump and his policies. The healthcare market also has suffered over the past few years as construction clients in the sector had to adjust to the impact of the 2010 Affordable Care Act. But several firms see a market pickup. “Right now, we are seeing lots of healthcare projects on the horizon … [mostly] medium-sized renovation and upgrade projects,” says Dan Starr, president of GE Johnson Construction Co. He says this upsurge is a carryover from the last recession when many hospitals held back on improving systems to better understand the Affordable Care Act and its impact on their business. Structure Tone also is benefitting from this uptick. “Our LF Driscoll team has been building healthcare facilities in the Philadelphia area and in New Jersey for decades, and we’ve now extended that expertise into the New York City metropolitan area,” says Bob Mullen, Structure Tone CEO. The markets in the technology and related sectors continue to go full-bore. “We are seeing an even stronger demand than last year from our advanced technology customers, who are building data-center and mission-critical projects to support the insatiable demand for new content,” says Mike Ford, a member of DPR’s management committee. Further, e-commerce is having a major impact on the retail market. Many firms bemoan that the market for retail stores and shopping malls is suffering as more people turn to online buying. On the other hand, “we see the industrial warehouse and distribution market remaining very strong for the near term. Vacancy rates are lower, and rents are slightly higher in most markets,” says Little of Alston Construction. “Similarly we see very healthy conditions in our food and beverage and healthcare segments.” Despite a strong market, many contractors complain that competition continues to be fierce. Some firms say that many contractors fear a decline in the market and are bidding on anything to build backlog to get them through future lean times. This fierce competition has caused margins to stagnate, despite the amount of work available. “It would be assumed that general contractor fees would have risen as firms have become busier, but that’s not necessarily what we’re seeing,” says Dave Bangasser, CEO of Opus Design Build. “Subcontractor margins have rebounded better than those of general contractors.” William H. Goodrich, CEO of LeChase Construction Services, adds that “a number of jobs are being awarded as if construction is purely a commodity—on price alone. But it may be a disservice to all contractors to accept that low bids—to the point of a deficit—are a strategy for being competitive. We have more to offer.” Part of the problem about depressed margins stems from owner expectations in the wake of the industry downturn in 2008. Many general contractors chased work at reduced margins to maintain market share. As a result, many clients became accustomed to lower construction costs. “This effect, coupled with high demand for new construction and the current labor shortage, has led some clients to believe that GCs are simply charging more for their services, when in many cases margins remain compressed,” says Mark Yanik, vice president of Leopardo Cos. Inc. Another recession hangover is the expectation by owners that contractors will accept more burden in contract terms. “A precedent was set in the recession for owners to include [contract clauses such as] no waiver of consequential damages, broad indemnity and other onerous contract terms, and this aggressive stance on contracting has not changed as the market rebounded,” says Tim Steigerwald, Messer Construction Co. senior vice president. Risk-shifting also is a major bone of contention among contractors. “A trend we are seeing more often is owners pushing more risk onto the contractor without the ability to manage those risks as we see fit, and contract terms that are less favorable,” says PCL’s Yancey. This trend has resulted in a rise in insurance premiums and deductibles, an increase in alternate procurement methods and a hike in regulations related to public works, adds Charles J. Montalbano, president of China Construction America-Civil. “The last few years it was a buyer’s market, where owners were able to push a lot of risk down on us, and we are beginning to pay for that,” says Cavallaro of Skanska USA. But he says that contractors in the current market are more willing and able to push back. “We push, they pull, but it won’t be as easy for owners to get everything they want now.” General contractors’ relationship with subcontractors has improved over the years, as the advancement of alternate delivery models for projects has forced both groups to work more as a team. “The days of contractors telling subs ‘Do what I say’ are over,” says McQuade of AECOM. However, in a strong market, contractors have begun to pay more attention both to the stability and the availability of subcontractors. McQuade says subs are getting stretched, and contractors must be clear on the scope of responsibilities of subs to make sure each under­stands what is expected and whether it has the resources and staff to complete the job. “We are in a day and age where information flow is by the second, but decision-making has not kept up. We are just developing technology to provide visual modeling to help customers make their decisions faster.” —Pat A. Di Filippo, Executive Vice President, Turner Construction Pat A. Di Filippo, executive vice president of Turner Construction, says the financial health of subcontractors is paramount to a successful project. “That is why we have instituted a program to pay invoices from subs within a few days of approval, rather than the normal 30-45 days,” he says, adding that this helps subcontractor cash flow and maintains good relations with firms. Subcontractors are the first ones to run into workforce shortages, particularly in the trades. So some contractors are employing new methods of packaging work to make sure subcontractors are able to perform. “We have seen shortages of labor and staff and we simply augment these trades by carving specific areas of work out of their contracts and awarding this work to additional contractors. On occasion, we may have as many as three contractors working on one trade,” says Colao of CNY Group. Shortages also have led to GCs taking a more active role in the construction process. For example, Turner Construction has begun self-performing concrete work in Boston, Seattle and selected markets in Florida, and occasionally drywall as well. “We are not looking to displace subcontractors, but on some jobs there is a need for special expertise that we can supply internally, rather than subbing it out,” says Di Filippo. Some major self-perform contractors have already addressed the problem of staffing. “Each market we are in has a different trajectory, so we have diversified,” says Futcher of Bechtel. He says that all staff use the same tools and processes, regardless of what market they are working in, making it easy for the company to move people from one type of work to another without worrying about retraining staffers in new procedures. “We have a global resource base of engineers, project managers and other professionals to draw on.” The construction industry has always been slow to adopt new methods and technology, but new advancements in design and communications technology have become a must for most large contractors. Building information modeling and communications technology have become the ante for major firms just to get in the game. Many contractors are venturing into new advanced technologies to improve productivity. For example, sensor technology is a relatively new method that is helping advance the speed of construction. “We are using concrete sensors that get tied to the rebar and buried when the concrete is poured, which in turn provides live drying and curing data directly to our superintendents’ phones, enabling us to make more informed decisions on flooring, roofing, schedules and protection from adverse weather conditions,” Mullen of Structure Tone points out. Site logistics modeling also enables contractors to engage owners on safety discussions, showing the swing radius of a tower crane and locations of laydown areas, traffic relocations and entrance protection. “These are the details owners care about beyond construction, and the 3D printed model builds upon what they can see in the virtual model,” says Steigerwald. Steigerwald also notes that subcontractors and craft workers appreciate site logistics modeling because it showcases complicated geometry, uncovers slab and beam details and depicts tie-in complexities that may otherwise be hard to see virtually. According to Steigerwald, “it’s a great tool for conceptualization and spurring strategic conversations and we’re using it in our owner, coordination and subcontractor meetings with great success.” As the Internet of Things makes its way into every industry, it also is gaining a place in design-build. “The idea of tracking each jobsite’s equipment, workers, milestones and more in one place will improve safety and efficiency, as well as potentially impact the bottom line,” says Gray of Gray Construction. While for some contractors, the information flow is a godsend, others worry that data flow isn’t the problem. “We are in a day and age where information flow is by the second, but decision-making has not kept up. We are just developing technology to provide visual modeling to help customers make their decisions faster,” says Di Filippo. Many contractors agree that virtual reality will speed decision-making. “Virtual reality on a couple of our biggest projects has proven to be very helpful for clients, enabling them to make quicker decisions and increasing their revenue potential before construction is completed,” says Leonard W. Martling, CEO of The Weitz Co.


News Article | May 16, 2017
Site: www.prnewswire.co.uk

Are you involved in Water Treatment chemicals or need to understand its market dynamics? If so, then you must read this report It's vital that you keep your knowledge up to date. You need this report. Market scope: This brand new report from visiongain is a completely fresh market assessment of the Water Treatment chemicals market based upon the latest information. Our new market study contains forecasts, original analysis, company profiles and, most crucially, fresh conclusions. The report gives detailed forecasts and analysis of the Water Treatment chemicals markets by region and end-use sectors. Water Treatment chemicals Market Forecast 2017-2027 report responds to your need for definitive market data: • Where are the Water Treatment chemicals market opportunities? • 198 tables, charts, and graphs reveal market data allowing you to target your strategy more effectively • When will the Water Treatment chemicals market grow? • Global, national and the Water Treatment chemicals submarket forecasts and analysis from 2017-2027 illustrate the market progression • Which Water Treatment chemicals submarkets will flourish from 2017-2027? • Municipal Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Power Generation Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Chemical Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Oil & Gas Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Metals & Mining Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Corrosion Inhibition Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Scale Inhibitors Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Coagulants & Flocculants Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Biocides & Disinfectants Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Where are the regional Water Treatment chemicals market opportunities from 2017-2027? Focused regional forecasts and analysis explore the future opportunities • Asia Pacific forecast 2017-2027 • Middle East and Africa forecast 2017-2027 • Central & South America forecast 2017-2027 • Europe forecast 2017-2027 • North America forecast 2017-2027 • China forecast 2017-2027 • Japan forecast 2017-2027 • Australia & New Zealand forecast 2017-2027 • India forecast 2017-2027 • Germany forecast 2017-2027 • U.K. forecast 2017-2027 • France forecast 2017-2027 • Italy forecast 2017-2027 • U.S. forecast 2017-2027 • Canada forecast 2017-2027 • Mexico forecast 2017-2027 • Saudi Arabia forecast 2017-2027 • Others forecast 2017-2027 • What are the factors influencing Water Treatment chemicals market dynamics? • SWOT analysis explores the factors. • Research and development (R&D) strategy • Supply and demand dynamics • Advances in product quality • Who are the leading Water Treatment chemicals companies? • We reveal market share, positioning, capabilities, product portfolios, R&D activity, services, focus, strategies, M&A activity, and future outlook. • AkzoNobel • GE Water Technologies Inc. • BASF • Solenis • DOW Chemical Company • Ecolab Inc. • Kemira • Lonza • Buckman Laboratories International • BWA Water • Who should read this report? • Anyone within the Water Treatment chemicals value chain, including • Raw material suppliers • R&D specialists • CEO's • COO's • CIO's • Business development managers • Marketing managers • Technologists • Investors • Banks • Government agencies • Contractors Get our report today Water Treatment Chemicals Market 2017-2027: Forecasts by Application (Municipal, Power Generation, Chemical, Oil & Gas, Metals & Mining), by Type (Corrosion Inhibition, Scale Inhibitors, Coagulants & Flocculants, Biocides & Disinfectants) and by Region Plus Profiles of Top Companies. Avoid missing out - order our report now. To request a report overview of this report please email Sara Peerun at sara.peerun@visiongain.com or call Tel: +44-(0)-20-7336-6100 Albemarle Corporation ALTIVIA Chemicals LLC Aqua innovative Solutions Arcana Pool Systems GmbH Arch Chemicals Anco India Chemicals (P) Ltd. Accepta Water Treatment American Water Works Company ANGUS Chemical Company Aries Chemical, Inc. Water Treatment Specialists Berwind Corporation BioLab Bonnafide Chemicals B & V Water Treatment Changzhou Kewei Fine Chemicals Company Limited Chembond Chemicals ChemTreat Chemtura Corporation Clinty Chemicals Ltd. Danaher Corporation Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction Company Limited Drew Ameroid Sdn Berhad DuPont (EI) de Nemours Ebara Corporation Eka Chemicals European salt company Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. FuMA-Tech Gessellschaft fur Funktionelle Membranen und Anlagentechnologie Feralco AB General Electric Company GLV Incorporated Great Lakes Solutions Israel Chemicals Limited Jianghai Environmental Protection Company Limited Jordan Bromine K+S AG KIK Custom Products Incorporated Koch Industries Incorporated Kurita Water Industries Limited Kroff Chemical Company, Inc. LANXESS AG Martinswerk Morton Salt MWH Global, Inc. Melzer Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. MB Chemicals Nalco Holding NSF International Occidental Petroleum Corporation OxyChem, Polydyne PowerChem Technology Pfaudler Inc. Quimiproductos Shanghai Duojia Water Treatment Science and Technology Company Limited SNF SAS Solvay SA Swing SUEZ Water UK Syn Water Sicagen India Limited TCI Chemicals Thermax Inc. Univar Inc. United Technical Services (UTS) Chemicals Veolia Environnement SA Vasu Chemicals Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Company Limited Water Bird L.L.C. Wex Technologies Government Agencies and Other Organisation Mentioned in This Report Environment Protection Agency European Union Food and Drug Administration Japan Industrial Safety & Health Association Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act Ministry of Water Resources Occupational Safety & Health Administration Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals U.S. Environmental Protection Agency World Bank To see a report overview please email Sara Peerun on sara.peerun@visiongain.com


News Article | May 16, 2017
Site: www.prnewswire.com

Are you involved in Water Treatment chemicals or need to understand its market dynamics? If so, then you must read this report It's vital that you keep your knowledge up to date. You need this report. Market scope: This brand new report from visiongain is a completely fresh market assessment of the Water Treatment chemicals market based upon the latest information. Our new market study contains forecasts, original analysis, company profiles and, most crucially, fresh conclusions. The report gives detailed forecasts and analysis of the Water Treatment chemicals markets by region and end-use sectors. Water Treatment chemicals Market Forecast 2017-2027 report responds to your need for definitive market data: • Where are the Water Treatment chemicals market opportunities? • 198 tables, charts, and graphs reveal market data allowing you to target your strategy more effectively • When will the Water Treatment chemicals market grow? • Global, national and the Water Treatment chemicals submarket forecasts and analysis from 2017-2027 illustrate the market progression • Which Water Treatment chemicals submarkets will flourish from 2017-2027? • Municipal Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Power Generation Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Chemical Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Oil & Gas Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Metals & Mining Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Corrosion Inhibition Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Scale Inhibitors Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Coagulants & Flocculants Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Biocides & Disinfectants Submarket Forecast 2017-2027 • Where are the regional Water Treatment chemicals market opportunities from 2017-2027? Focused regional forecasts and analysis explore the future opportunities • Asia Pacific forecast 2017-2027 • Middle East and Africa forecast 2017-2027 • Central & South America forecast 2017-2027 • Europe forecast 2017-2027 • North America forecast 2017-2027 • China forecast 2017-2027 • Japan forecast 2017-2027 • Australia & New Zealand forecast 2017-2027 • India forecast 2017-2027 • Germany forecast 2017-2027 • U.K. forecast 2017-2027 • France forecast 2017-2027 • Italy forecast 2017-2027 • U.S. forecast 2017-2027 • Canada forecast 2017-2027 • Mexico forecast 2017-2027 • Saudi Arabia forecast 2017-2027 • Others forecast 2017-2027 • What are the factors influencing Water Treatment chemicals market dynamics? • SWOT analysis explores the factors. • Research and development (R&D) strategy • Supply and demand dynamics • Advances in product quality • Who are the leading Water Treatment chemicals companies? • We reveal market share, positioning, capabilities, product portfolios, R&D activity, services, focus, strategies, M&A activity, and future outlook. • AkzoNobel • GE Water Technologies Inc. • BASF • Solenis • DOW Chemical Company • Ecolab Inc. • Kemira • Lonza • Buckman Laboratories International • BWA Water • Who should read this report? • Anyone within the Water Treatment chemicals value chain, including • Raw material suppliers • R&D specialists • CEO's • COO's • CIO's • Business development managers • Marketing managers • Technologists • Investors • Banks • Government agencies • Contractors Get our report today Water Treatment Chemicals Market 2017-2027: Forecasts by Application (Municipal, Power Generation, Chemical, Oil & Gas, Metals & Mining), by Type (Corrosion Inhibition, Scale Inhibitors, Coagulants & Flocculants, Biocides & Disinfectants) and by Region Plus Profiles of Top Companies. Avoid missing out - order our report now. To request a report overview of this report please email Sara Peerun at sara.peerun@visiongain.com or call Tel: +44-(0)-20-7336-6100 Albemarle Corporation ALTIVIA Chemicals LLC Aqua innovative Solutions Arcana Pool Systems GmbH Arch Chemicals Anco India Chemicals (P) Ltd. Accepta Water Treatment American Water Works Company ANGUS Chemical Company Aries Chemical, Inc. Water Treatment Specialists Berwind Corporation BioLab Bonnafide Chemicals B & V Water Treatment Changzhou Kewei Fine Chemicals Company Limited Chembond Chemicals ChemTreat Chemtura Corporation Clinty Chemicals Ltd. Danaher Corporation Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction Company Limited Drew Ameroid Sdn Berhad DuPont (EI) de Nemours Ebara Corporation Eka Chemicals European salt company Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. FuMA-Tech Gessellschaft fur Funktionelle Membranen und Anlagentechnologie Feralco AB General Electric Company GLV Incorporated Great Lakes Solutions Israel Chemicals Limited Jianghai Environmental Protection Company Limited Jordan Bromine K+S AG KIK Custom Products Incorporated Koch Industries Incorporated Kurita Water Industries Limited Kroff Chemical Company, Inc. LANXESS AG Martinswerk Morton Salt MWH Global, Inc. Melzer Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. MB Chemicals Nalco Holding NSF International Occidental Petroleum Corporation OxyChem, Polydyne PowerChem Technology Pfaudler Inc. Quimiproductos Shanghai Duojia Water Treatment Science and Technology Company Limited SNF SAS Solvay SA Swing SUEZ Water UK Syn Water Sicagen India Limited TCI Chemicals Thermax Inc. Univar Inc. United Technical Services (UTS) Chemicals Veolia Environnement SA Vasu Chemicals Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Company Limited Water Bird L.L.C. Wex Technologies Government Agencies and Other Organisation Mentioned in This Report Environment Protection Agency European Union Food and Drug Administration Japan Industrial Safety & Health Association Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act Ministry of Water Resources Occupational Safety & Health Administration Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals U.S. Environmental Protection Agency World Bank To see a report overview please email Sara Peerun on sara.peerun@visiongain.com

Loading MWH Global Inc collaborators
Loading MWH Global Inc collaborators