Entity

Time filter

Source Type

North Bethesda, MD, United States

Litzelman K.,University of Wisconsin - Madison | Litzelman K.,609 Medical Center Dr | Skinner H.G.,University of Wisconsin - Madison | Gangnon R.E.,University of Wisconsin - Madison | And 3 more authors.
Quality of Life Research | Year: 2014

Purpose: Informal caregivers play a critical role in the care of individuals who are aging or have disabilities and are at increased risk for poor health outcomes. This study sought to determine whether and to what extent: (1) global stress and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) differed between caregivers and non-caregivers; (2) global stress mediated the relationship between caregiving status and HRQoL; and (3) caregiver strain (i.e., stress attributable to caregiving) was associated with worse HRQoL after accounting for global stress. Methods: Cross-sectional data were from the 2008-2010 Survey of the Health of Wisconsin, a representative sample of adults aged 21-74 years. Participants (n = 1,364) completed questionnaires about caregiving status, sociodemographics, global stress, and HRQoL. Staged generalized additive models assessed the impact of caregiving on HRQoL and the role of caregiver strain and global stress in this relationship. Results: In the last 12 months, 17.2 % of the sample reported caregiving. Caregivers reported worse mental HRQoL than non-caregivers (β -1.88, p = 0.02); global stress mediated this relationship (p < 0.01). Caregivers with the highest levels of strain reported worse mental and physical HRQoL (β -7.12, p < 0.01), and caregivers with the lowest levels of strain reported better mental HRQoL (β 2.06, p = 0.01) than non-caregivers; these associations were attenuated by global stress (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Global stress, rather than caregiving per se, contributes to poor HRQoL among caregivers, above and beyond the effect of caregiving strain. Screening, monitoring, and reducing stress in multiple life domains presents an opportunity to improve HRQoL outcomes for caregivers. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. Source


Rowland J.H.,U.S. National Cancer Institute | Rowland J.H.,609 Medical Center Dr | Bellizzi K.M.,University of Connecticut
Journal of Clinical Oncology | Year: 2014

The US population of cancer survivors age ≥ 65 years will continue to grow rapidly over the next few decades. This growth will be driven largely by the aging of the national population. With the diffusion of earlier detection and more effective therapies, the majority of these individuals can expect to live long term after diagnosis. This often vulnerable group of survivors poses significant challenges for both researchers and clinicians with regard to how best to document and address its unique health care needs. In this article, we briefly review the long-term and late-occurring effects of cancer and its treatment in older survivors, review information on current patterns of post-treatment care and the evolving guidelines for this care, and discuss opportunities for future research. Copyright © 2014 American Society of Clinical Oncology. Source

Discover hidden collaborations