Entity

Time filter

Source Type

Phoenix, AZ, United States

Dodick D.W.,Mayo Clinic Arizona
Seminars in Neurology | Year: 2010

Distinguishing primary headache from secondary headache is the first objective of every new clinical encounter with a patient complaining of headache. The history is king in headache medicine-90% of patients presenting with headache have a primary headache disorder and the examination is normal. The history must be elicited because patients will not always volunteer seminal information. A standard series of questions must be asked of each patient to guide an appropriate diagnostic evaluation and ensure that secondary causes are not overlooked. The second objective, of course, is making the correct diagnosis of the primary headache disorder. Although at first glance this appears obvious and almost patronizing, making the correct diagnosis is often not a priority, nor is it a process that is emphasized in undergraduate and postgraduate training programs. Knowing some simple rules and standard questions will make the process almost fail proof. © 2010 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. Source


Caselli R.J.,Mayo Clinic Arizona
Alzheimer's Research and Therapy | Year: 2012

With the recent interest in Alzheimer's disease course modification and earlier, even preclinical, intervention, questions have arisen regarding the potentially confounding impact of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype on study design, therapeutic outcomes, and even clinical practice. APOE e4 carriers have a faster rate of cognitive decline both preclinically and during the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage, and a higher burden of cerebrovascular amyloid that may be the basis for the observed gene-dose-related increased frequency of immunomodulatory therapy-induced meningoencephalitis and cerebral microhemorrhages. To date, this has impacted study design in some research trials but not clinical practice. © 2012 BioMed Central Ltd. Source


Gnagi S.H.,Mayo Clinic Arizona | Schraff S.A.,Phoenix Childrens Hospital
Pediatric Clinics of North America | Year: 2013

Nasal obstruction is a serious clinical scenario in the newborn infant with a large differential diagnosis. This article reviews the etiologies of nasal obstruction to aid the pediatrician in prompt evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Source


Reeder C.B.,Mayo Clinic Arizona | Ansell S.M.,Mayo Medical School
Blood | Year: 2011

Several novel targeted therapies have recently emerged as active in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including small molecules that inhibit critical signaling pathways, promote apoptotic mechanisms, or modulate the tumor microenvironment. Other new agents target novel cell surface receptors or promote DNA damage. Although most of these drugs have single-agent activity, none have sufficient activity to be used alone. This article reviews the utility and potential role of these new agents in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a specific focus on data that highlight how these agents may be incorporated into current standard treatment approaches. © 2011 by The American Society of Hematology. Source


Caviness J.N.,Mayo Clinic Arizona
Neurotherapeutics | Year: 2014

Myoclonus creates significant disability for patients. This symptom or sign can have many different etiologies, presentations, and pathophysiological mechanisms. A thorough evaluation for the myoclonus etiology is critical for developing a treatment strategy. The best etiological classification scheme is a modified version from that proposed by Marsden et al. in 1982. Clinical neurophysiology, as assessed by electromyography and electroencephalography, can be used to classify the pathophysiology of the myoclonus using a neurophysiology classification scheme. If the etiology of the myoclonus cannot be reversed or treated, then symptomatic treatment of the myoclonus itself may be warranted. Unfortunately, there are few controlled studies for myoclonus treatments. The treatment strategy for the myoclonus is best derived from the neurophysiology classification scheme categories: 1) cortical, 2) cortical-subcortical, 3) subcortical-nonsegmental, 4) segmental, and 5) peripheral. A cortical physiology classification is most common. Levetiracetam is suggested as first-line treatment for cortical myoclonus, but valproic acid and clonazepam are commonly used. Cortical-subcortical myoclonus is the physiology demonstrated by myoclonic seizures, such as in primary epileptic myoclonus (e.g., juvenile myoclonic epilepsy). Valproic acid has demonstrated efficacy in such epileptic syndromes with other medications providing an adjunctive role. Clonazepam is used for subcortical-nonsegmental myoclonus, but other treatments, depending on the syndrome, have been used for this physiological type of myoclonus. Segmental myoclonus is difficult to treat, but clonazepam and botulinum toxin are used. Botulinum toxin is used for focal examples of peripheral myoclonus. Myoclonus treatment is commonly not effective and/or limited by side effects. © 2013 The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Inc. Source

Discover hidden collaborations