Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf

Großhansdorf, Germany

Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf

Großhansdorf, Germany
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

Klippe H.J.,Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf | Kirsten D.,Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf
Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) | Year: 2016

Today Miliary Tuberculosis in Central Europe is a rare disease, quite often with resulting diagnostic uncertainty. The terms "miliary" and "tubercle" are outlined with their up to now accepted historical roots. An analysis of Marcello Malpighi's quite unknown post-mortem reports by the Italian author L. Munster reveals an earlier use of both terms than described till now. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.


Merimsky O.,Tel Aviv Medical Center | Cheng C.-K.,Princess Margaret Hospital | Au J.S.-K.,Queen Elizabeth Hospital | Von Pawel J.,Asklepios Fachkliniken | Reck M.,Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf
Oncology Reports | Year: 2012

TaRceva LUng cancer Survival Treatment (TRUST) was an open-label, phase IV study of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients failing or unsuitable for chemotherapy or radiotherapy received erlotinib 150 mg/day until progression. We examined a subpopulation of elderly patients (≥70 years) receiving first-line erlotinib (n=485) in TRUST. In this subpopulation, disease control rate (n=356 with best response data available) was 79% (vs. 69% for the overall TRUST population; P<0.0001); median progressionfree survival (PFS) was 4.57 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.68-5.22]; median overall survival (OS) was 7.29 months (95% CI, 6.27-8.67); and one-year survival, was 36.6%. PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients developing rash, compared to those without, and in those with good performance status (PS; 0/1), compared to poor PS (≥2). Eighty-seven subpopulation patients (18%) had an erlotinib-related AE; other than the protocol-defined frequent adverse events (AEs); 4% had a grade ≥3 erlotinib-related AE, 7% had an erlotinib-related serious AE. In the subpopulation, dose reductions were required in 27%, most (97%) were reductions to 100 mg/day; treatment was discontinued in 10%, and one death was associated with treatment-related toxicity (<1%). Erlotinib was effective and well-tolerated and may be considered for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC who are unsuitable for standard first-line chemotherapy or radiotherapy.


Leighl N.B.,University of Toronto | Zatloukal P.,Charles University | Mezger J.,St. Vincentius Kliniken | Ramlau R.,Wielkopolskie Centrum Chorob Pluc i Gruzlicy | And 3 more authors.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | Year: 2010

The placebo-controlled, phase III AVAiL trial evaluated bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with advanced, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. A retrospective subgroup analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based therapy in elderly patients aged 65 years or older in AVAiL. Methods: Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 for up to six cycles plus 7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg bevacizumab, or placebo every 3 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, overall survival, and safety. Results: Data were evaluated for 304 patients aged 65 years or older (median age 68 years). Most of the patients were Caucasian (87%) and the majority had adenocarcinoma (83%). In the combined bevacizumab arms, 143 patients (79%) completed ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients who received bevacizumab derived an improvement in progression-free survival compared with placebo (7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, p = 0.023; 15 mg/kg bevacizumab: HR = 0.84, p = 0.25). Objective response rates were 40, 29, and 30% in the 7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg bevacizumab, and placebo arms, respectively. Overall survival was similar for each bevacizumab arm versus placebo (7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab: HR = 0.84, p = 0.31; 15 mg/kg bevacizumab: HR = 0.88, p = 0.44). There were no particular safety signals of concern in elderly patients. Conclusions: This analysis of the randomized, phase III AVAiL trial shows that bevacizumab-based therapy improves outcomes for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Furthermore, bevacizumab-based therapy is well tolerated in elderly patients. Copyright © 2010 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.


Ray J.A.,Hoffmann-La Roche | Chouaid C.,Respiratory Service | Grossi F.,Italian National Cancer Institute | Bischoff H.G.,Thoracic Oncology | And 2 more authors.
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research | Year: 2012

Background: Platinum-doublet, first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited to 4-6 cycles. An alternative strategy used to prolong the duration of first-line treatment and extend survival in metastatic NSCLC is first-line maintenance therapy. Erlotinib was approved for first-line maintenance in a stable disease population following results from a randomized, controlled Phase III trial comparing erlotinib with best supportive care. We aimed to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of erlotinib 150 mg/day versus best supportive care when used as first-line maintenance therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and stable disease. Methods: An economic decision model was developed using patient-level data for progressionfree survival and overall survival from the SATURN (SequentiAl Tarceva in UnResectable NSCLC) study. An area under the curve model was developed; all patients entered the model in the progression-free survival health state and, after each month, moved to progression or death. A time horizon of 5 years was used. The model was conducted from the perspective of national health care payers in France, Germany, and Italy. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Treatment with erlotinib in first-line maintenance resulted in a mean life expectancy of 1.39 years in all countries, compared with a mean 1.11 years with best supportive care, which represents 0.28 life-years (3.4 life-months) gained with erlotinib versus best supportive care. In the base-case analysis, the cost per life-year gained was €39,783, €46,931, and €27,885 in France, Germany, and Italy, respectively. Conclusion: Erlotinib is a cost-effective treatment option when used as first-line maintenance therapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. © 2012 Vergnenègre et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.


Reck M.,Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf | von Pawel J.,Pneumology Clinic | Zatloukal P.,Charles University | Ramlau R.,Regional Center for Lung Disease | And 7 more authors.
Annals of Oncology | Year: 2010

Background: Bevacizumab, the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent, provides clinical benefit when combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We report the final overall survival (OS) analysis from the phase III AVAiL trial. Patients and methods: Patients (n = 1043) received cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 for up to six cycles plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg (n = 345), bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (n = 351) or placebo (n = 347) every 3 weeks until progression. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); OS was a secondary end point. Results: Significant PFS prolongation with bevacizumab compared with placebo was maintained with longer follow-up {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.75 (0.64-0.87), P = 0.0003 and 0.85 (0.73-1.00), P = 0.0456} for the 7.5 and 15 mg/kg groups, respectively. Median OS was >13 months in all treatment groups; nevertheless, OS was not significantly increased with bevacizumab [HR (95% CI) 0.93 (0.78-1.11), P = 0.420 and 1.03 (0.86-1.23), P = 0.761] for the 7.5 and 15 mg/kg groups, respectively, versus placebo. Most patients (∼62%) received multiple lines of poststudy treatment. Updated safety results are consistent with those previously reported. Conclusions: Final analysis of AVAiL confirms the efficacy of bevacizumab when combined with cisplatin-gemcitabine. The PFS benefit did not translate into a significant OS benefit, possibly due to high use of efficacious second-line therapies. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.


Nuijten M.J.C.,Ars Accessus Medica | de Castro Carpeno J.,Hospital Universitario La Paz | Chouaid C.,APHP | Vergnenegre A.,Hopital du Cluzeau | And 4 more authors.
Lung Cancer | Year: 2012

Erlotinib and pemetrexed were approved by the European Medicines Agency for first-line maintenance treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to prolong overall survival after first-line therapy. An adjusted, matched, indirect comparison of erlotinib and pemetrexed suggested that survival benefits were not statistically significantly different between treatments. We conducted a cost-comparison analysis of erlotinib versus pemetrexed in first-line maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic, non-squamous NSCLC in France, Germany, Italy and Spain, performed from the perspective of national health-care decision-makers or purchasers. The analysis was limited to direct costs and comprised drug-acquisition costs, administration costs and costs of treating adverse events (AEs). A one-way sensitivity analysis on administration, acquisition and AE costs was also performed. Total monthly per-patient treatment costs for erlotinib in France, Germany, Italy and Spain were €2140, €2732, €1518 and €2048, respectively, and for pemetrexed €3453, €5534, €2921 and €3164, respectively. AE cost was greater for pemetrexed in all countries, as was administration cost. As an oral treatment, erlotinib is not associated with any administration costs, except in Germany, where the cost is lower than for pemetrexed. The sensitivity analysis showed acquisition costs to be the main driver of total monthly per-patient costs. Erlotinib appears to be a cost-saving treatment alternative to pemetrexed, producing comparable survival benefits, based on an indirect comparison, at a lower cost. © 2011.


Bischoff H.G.,Thoraxklinik Heidelberg GmbH | Heigener D.F.,Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf | Walzer S.,Hoffmann-La Roche | Nuijten M.,Ars Accessus Medica
Lung Cancer | Year: 2010

The new targeted agent bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine, and a third-generation chemotherapy pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin, have been approved as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An indirect comparison between bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine and pemetrexed plus cisplatin showed that bevacizumab (plus cisplatin and gemcitabine) achieved a favourable hazard ratio in terms of progression-free survival among patients with advanced NSCLC. This analysis aimed to compare the monthly cost of these treatments for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Italy and Germany.The comparison used country specific cost data and adopted the payer perspective in Italy and Germany.The monthly cost of bevacizumab, including administration cost, as a single agent was €1,509 and €2,564 less than pemetrexed in Italy and Germany, respectively. The monthly treatment cost of bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine was €1,001 and €446 less than pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in Italy and Germany, respectively.Results indicate that clinical benefits with bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine therapy are achieved at a lower monthly cost than pemetrexed plus gemcitabine doublet therapy. Therefore, from a budget perspective, bevacizumab should be considered as a preferred targeted treatment of choice for advanced non-squamous NSCLC. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.


Ranson M.,University of Manchester | Reck M.,Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf | Anthoney A.,University of Leeds | Hanauske A.-R.,St Georg Hospital | And 6 more authors.
Annals of Oncology | Year: 2010

Background: Erlotinib and pemetrexed are approved single agents for second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and, in combination, have shown synergistic antitumor activity in NSCLC cell lines. We investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of combined erlotinib-pemetrexed in patients with refractory advanced NSCLC. Patients and methods: A nonrandomized, open-label, phase IB study was performed in patients with advanced NSCLC whose disease had progressed on or following first-line chemotherapy with a platinum-containing regimen or for whom the erlotinib-pemetrexed combination was considered appropriate. Patients received i.v. pemetrexed 500-700mg/m2 every 3 weeks and oral erlotinib 100-150mg/day. Results: Twenty patients were recruited. The most common adverse events (AEs) were rash, diarrhea and fatigue. Serious AEs occurred in eight patients (three treatment related) and there were eight deaths (none treatment related). Dose-limiting toxic effects were not experienced up to erlotinib 150mg/day plus pemetrexed 600mg/m2. Concurrent administration did not affect pharmacokinetic parameters. Two patients achieved partial responses and nine had stable disease. Conclusions: Erlotinib-pemetrexed combination is well tolerated at doses equal to the licensed single-agent doses (150mg/day and 500mg/m2, respectively). The good tolerability profile and promising efficacy indicate that this combination warrants further investigation for patients with advanced NSCLC. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.


Heigener D.F.,Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf | Rabe K.F.,Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf
Respiration | Year: 2011

Many respiratory diseases besides lung cancer are still not curable. There is an unmet need for palliative care, especially in non-malignant conditions. In this article we focus on symptomatic treatment of typical symptoms in respiratory disease beyond causal treatment. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.


PubMed | Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf
Type: Journal Article | Journal: Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) | Year: 2016

Today Miliary Tuberculosis in Central Europe is a rare disease, quite often with resulting diagnostic uncertainty. The terms miliary and tubercle are outlined with their up to now accepted historical roots. An analysis of Marcello Malpighis quite unknown post-mortem reports by the Italian author L. Munster reveals an earlier use of both terms than described till now.

Loading Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf collaborators
Loading Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf collaborators