Time filter

Source Type

Hofheinz R.-D.,University of Heidelberg | Al-Batran S.-E.,Klinik fur Onkologie und Hamatologie Am Krankenhaus Nordwest | Ridwelski K.,Chirurgische Klinik | Gorg C.,Universitatsklinikum Marburg | And 6 more authors.
Onkologie | Year: 2010

Background: Randomized studies proved the efficacy of new drugs for the systemic treatment of advanced gastric cancer in the past 5 years. However, little is known about the use of firstline chemotherapy in clinical practice in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and the stomach. We investigated temporal trends in therapy and factors influencing treatment decisions for these patients during a 4-year period. Patients and Methods: 1058 patients (median age 67 years) with advanced AEG or gastric cancers undergoing treatment decisions were documented with the Therapiemonitor® in 2006-2009. Therapiemonitor collects population-based data regarding treatment decisions and strategies. Time trends of drug use and intensity in the first-line treatment were analyzed in the entire patient group and according to age (cut-off 65 years) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS; cut-off 80%). Results: Over time, the use of oxaliplatin and docetaxel as well as capecitabine increased while cisplatin and irinotecan use slightly declined. The use of chemotherapy triplets rose from 10.1% in 2006 to 47.0% in 2009. Treatment patterns significantly varied by age and KPS: Older patients were significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy triplets, cisplatin and docetaxel but tended to more often receive oxaliplatin. Likewise, triplets, cisplatin and docetaxel were less frequently used in patients with KPS < 80%, while capecitabine and irinotecan were significantly more often used in this patient group. Conclusions: A clear tendency towards the use of more intensive chemotherapy regimens in patients with AEG and gastric cancer was observed over time. Older or less fit patients were treated preferably with monotherapy or chemotherapy doublets during 2006-2009. Oxaliplatin and docetaxel use has substantially risen. © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel. Source

Joensuu H.,University of Helsinki | Eriksson M.,Lund University | Sundby Hall K.,University of Oslo | Reichardt A.,Sarkomzentrum Berlin Brandenburg | And 15 more authors.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | Year: 2016

Purpose: Three years of adjuvant imatinib therapy are recommended for patients with GI stromal tumor (GIST) with high-risk features, according to survival findings in the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII/AIO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie) trial. To investigate whether the survival benefits have persisted, we performed the second planned analysis of the trial. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had macroscopically completely excised, KIT-positive GIST with a high risk of recurrence, as determined by using the modified National Institutes of Health criteria. After surgery, the patients were randomly assigned to receive imatinib for either 1 or 3 years. The primary objective was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary objectives included survival. Results: A total of 400 patients were entered onto this open-label study between February 4, 2004, and September 29, 2008. During a median follow-up of 90 months, 171 recurrences and 69 deaths were detected. Patients assigned to the 3-year group had longer RFS than those assigned to the 1- year group; 5-year RFS was 71.1% versus 52.3%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.81; P < .001), and survival was 91.9% versus 85.3% (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.97; P = .036). Patients in the 3-year group survived longer in the subset with centrally confirmed GIST and without macroscopic metastases at study entry (93.4% v 86.8%; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.93; P = .024). Similar numbers of cardiac events and second cancers were recorded in the groups. Conclusion: Three years of adjuvant imatinib therapy results in longer survival than 1 year of imatinib. High 5-year survival rates are achievable in patient populations with high-risk GIST. © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology. Source

Gencer D.,University of Heidelberg | Al-Batran S.-E.,Klinik fur Onkologie und Hamatologie Am Krankenhaus Nordwest | Dada R.,Universitatsklinikum Aachen Hamatologie Onkologie | Hunerliturkoglu A.-N.,Lukaskrankenhaus | And 7 more authors.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Year: 2013

Purpose: Little is known about the use of first-line chemotherapy in clinical practice in patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, and no data have been published regarding potential obstacles for the implementation of molecular testing for targeted agents in this patient group. Here, we sought to evaluate factors influencing treatment decisions with special focus on the implementation of HER2 testing during the first year after trastuzumab market approval in Germany. Methods: A total of 754 patients undergoing treatment decisions for palliative first-line therapy in 2010 were documented using Therapiemonitor®. Drug use and intensity of first-line treatment were analyzed. Data on HER2 testing and test algorithm are described, and variables influencing HER2 testing were selected using bivariate analysis. Significant factors were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Compared with previous years, treatment intensity has further increased. The use of chemotherapy triplets rose from 10.1 % in 2006 to 60.3 % in 2010. In 2010, 49.1 % of patients were tested for HER2 and in 52.2 % of these patients the currently proposed test algorithm was used. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis age ≥67 years and "initiating institution: practice" were found to negatively impact the likelihood of HER2 testing, while treatment goal "prevention of progression", multiple metastases and a Karnofsky status >80 % showed positive correlation with HER2 testing. Conclusion: The tendency to use more intensive first-line chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma continued in 2010. Only a minority of patients had an access to the appropriate molecular diagnostics and therefore to treatment with trastuzumab. The access was limited due to the preselection following individual, clinical and institutional factors. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Source

Al-Batran S.-E.,Klinik fur Onkologie und Hamatologie Am Krankenhaus Nordwest | Guntner M.,Trium Analysis Online GmbH | Pauligk C.,Klinik fur Onkologie und Hamatologie Am Krankenhaus Nordwest | Scholz M.,Trium Analysis Online GmbH | And 6 more authors.
British Journal of Cancer | Year: 2010

Background:The aim of this study was to determine the activity of anthracycline rechallenge using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with conventional anthracyclines.Methods:Pooled individual data from four prospective trials were used, and the primary end point of the pooled analysis was clinical benefit rate (CBR). The studies comprised 935 patients, of whom 274 had received PLD in the metastatic setting after prior exposure to conventional anthracyclines (rechallenge population).Results:The majority of patients were heavily pretreated. Previous anthracycline therapy was administered in the adjuvant (14%) or metastatic setting (46%), or both (40%). The overall CBR from rechallenge with PLD was 37.2% (95% CI, 32.4-42.0). In univariate analyses, the CBR was significantly higher in patients with less exposure to prior chemotherapy, in taxane-naive patients, and in patients with a favourable Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 0 vs 1 vs 2 (53.3 vs 35.5 vs 18.2%; P0.001). In multivariate analyses, performance status proved to be the only independent predictor of the CBR achieved with PLD rechallenge (P0.038). There was no statistically significant difference in CBR regarding the setting, cumulative dose of and/or resistance to prior anthracyclines, or time since prior anthracycline administration.Conclusion:Anthracycline rechallenge using PLD is effective in patients with MBC who have a favourable performance status, regardless of setting, resistance, cumulative dose or time since prior conventional anthracycline therapy. © 2010 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved. Source

Discover hidden collaborations