Somerville, NJ, United States
Somerville, NJ, United States

Time filter

Source Type

Roy S.,Health Economics and Outcomes Research | Patkar A.,Health Economics and Outcomes Research | Daskiran M.,Johnson and Johnson Inc. | Levine R.,Johnson and Johnson Inc. | And 2 more authors.
Surgical Infections | Year: 2014

Background: Owing to a lack of current understanding of outcomes and costs by type of hysterectomy procedure, we attempt to quantify the incidence and impact of surgical site infection (SSI) in laparoscopic and non-laparoscopic approaches to abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Methods: Patients whose data were contained in the Premier Perspectives Database of 600 hospitals in the United States were selected on the basis of a post-operative diagnosis of SSI and treatment with antibiotics. The incidence of SSI and associated hospital length of stay (LOS) and costs were estimated. The effect of SSI on readmission was also analyzed. Results: Of 210,916 hysterectomies included in the study, 55% were open abdominal procedures. Although the overall incidence of SSI in hysterectomy was low, its incidence was greater in open abdominal hysterectomy than in other approaches to hysterectomy. Patients with an SSI experienced a three- to five-fold greater LOS, two-fold greater cost, and three-fold greater risk of hospital readmission than those without an SSI. Conclusions: This study provides clinical evidence in support of less invasive approaches to hysterectomy. In addition to other documented benefits of such less invasive procedures, the lower incidence of SSIs and lower rates of associated complications and costs with these procedures than with open abdominal hysterectomy should be taken into account when weighing the risks and benefits of a surgical approach for patients whose condition warrants hysterectomy. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.


Roy S.,Johnson and Johnson Global Surgery Group | Bramley T.J.,Xcenda | Hinoul P.,Johnson and Johnson Global Surgery Group | Migliaccio-Walle K.,Xcenda | Li H.,Xcenda
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants | Year: 2013

Overview: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is associated with a hefty economic burden. Retropubic and transobturator vaginal slings have become common surgical options for women with SUI. This study examines the costs of transobturator slings for SUI surgeries. Methods: A model was created to estimate the budget impact to hospitals of transobturator sling surgery in women with SUI. Current practice using transobturator slings including the Monarc™ Subfascial Hammock, Obtryx® Transobturator Mid-Urethral Sling System, Aris® Transobturator Sling System, Align® TO Trans-Obturator Urethral Support System, GYNECARE TVT™ Obturator System Tension-free Support for Incontinence and GYNECARE TVT ABBREVO™ Continence System were modeled. Four surgical complications were considered: re-operation due to failure, revision or removal of sling, urologic complications including urinary obstruction and urinary tract infection, and pelvic complications. This model calculates the average 1-year cost per patient with the use of each sling product and estimates the total budget for sling urinary incontinence surgery associated with each product based on these calculations. Results: Average incremental cost over 1 year ranged from $2,601 (GYNECARE TVT™ Obturator) to $3,132 (Desara®) per patient. In a hypothetical population of 100 patients, a 10% shift from the most to the least expensive option was associated with a 2% decrease in hospital expenditures. With the current market share for transobturator sling products, the expected expenditure is around $285,533 for a surgical population of 100 patients. Sling costs account for approximately $105,526 (37%) of this cost, with complications comprising the remaining majority. Conclusion: This study represents the first comparative assessment of the costs of different sling options for stress urinary incontinence surgeries. GYNECARE TVT ABBREVO™ and GYNECARE TVT™ Obturator products represent a sound clinical and economic choice for hospitals. Moreover, the reduction in expenditures is obtained at the benefit of patients, who experience fewer complications and avoid complication-related procedures. © 2013 by Begell House, Inc.


Magee G.,Premier Research Services | Roy S.,Johnson and Johnson Global Surgery Group | Hinoul P.,Johnson and Johnson Global Surgery Group | Moretz C.,Premier Research Services | And 3 more authors.
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants | Year: 2012

Stress urinary incontinence affects a significant proportion of the adult female population in the United States with prevalence increasing with growing age. Mid-urethral slings are among surgical options offering important improvement in the condition. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of different mid-urethral sling products with respect to postsurgery complications. This retrospective study utilized data from the Premier Perspective Database for mid-urethral sling procedures between 2005 and 2009. Patients were grouped into retropubic or transobturator cohorts, and these cohorts were further divided by the sling utilized during the procedure. Surgical outcomes and 12-month complication rates were assessed. In general, there were fewer complications noted for transobturator procedures than for retropubic procedures. In the retropubic category, Gynecare TVT had significantly lower rates of urinary obstruction/retention than other retropubic procedures. In the transobturator category, lower rates of overall pelvic complications as well as urologic complications, including urgency incontinence and urinary tract infections, were observed in the Gynecare TVTO subgroup than other transobturator procedures. Results of this study confirm the low overall rate of complications for midurethral sling procedures while at the same time suggesting that product choice may also have an impact on complication rates. © 2012 by Begell House, Inc.

Loading Johnson and Johnson Global Surgery Group collaborators
Loading Johnson and Johnson Global Surgery Group collaborators