SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

The material, leather, also include a wide range of resource. It is made by tanning of animal skin and rawhide. Leather also has a wide material resource, including cowhide, buffalo hide, hog skin, goat and sheep skin, dear skin, and other large amount origins of animal skins. The range of synthetic materials used in the leather goods industry is very wide. For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com This report focuses on the Automotive Interior Leather in Global market, especially in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa. This report categorizes the market based on manufacturers, regions, type and application. Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy) Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia etc.) Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa) Market Segment by Applications, can be divided into Headliners Seats Door Trims Consoles Others There are 15 Chapters to deeply display the global Automotive Interior Leather market. Chapter 2, to analyze the top manufacturers of Automotive Interior Leather, with sales, revenue, and price of Automotive Interior Leather, in 2016 and 2017; Chapter 3, to display the competitive situation among the top manufacturers, with sales, revenue and market share in 2016 and 2017; Chapter 4, to show the global market by regions, with sales, revenue and market share of Automotive Interior Leather, for each region, from 2012 to 2017; 1 Market Overview 1.1 Automotive Interior Leather Introduction 1.2 Market Analysis by Type 1.2.1 Genuine Leather 1.2.2 Synthetic Leather 1.3 Market Analysis by Applications 1.3.1 Headliners 1.3.2 Seats 1.3.3 Door Trims 1.3.4 Consoles 1.3.5 Others 1.4 Market Analysis by Regions 1.4.1 North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) 1.4.1.1 USA Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.1.2 Canada Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.1.3 Mexico Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.2 Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy) 1.4.2.1 Germany Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.2.2 France Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.2.3 UK Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.2.4 Russia Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.2.5 Italy Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.3 Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) 1.4.3.1 China Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.3.2 Japan Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.3.3 Korea Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.3.4 India Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.3.5 Southeast Asia Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.4 South America, Middle East and Africa 1.4.4.1 Brazil Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.4.2 Egypt Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.4.3 Saudi Arabia Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.4.4 South Africa Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.4.4.5 Nigeria Market States and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.5 Market Dynamics 1.5.1 Market Opportunities 1.5.2 Market Risk 1.5.3 Market Driving Force 2 Manufacturers Profiles 2.1 Eagle Ottawa 2.1.1 Business Overview 2.1.2 Automotive Interior Leather Type and Applications 2.1.2.1 Type 1 2.1.2.2 Type 2 2.1.3 Eagle Ottawa Automotive Interior Leather Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017) 2.2 GST AutoLeather 2.2.1 Business Overview 2.2.2 Automotive Interior Leather Type and Applications 2.2.2.1 Type 1 2.2.2.2 Type 2 2.2.3 GST AutoLeather Automotive Interior Leather Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017) 2.3 Bader GmbH 2.3.1 Business Overview 2.3.2 Automotive Interior Leather Type and Applications 2.3.2.1 Type 1 2.3.2.2 Type 2 2.3.3 Bader GmbH Automotive Interior Leather Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017) 2.4 Boxmark 2.4.1 Business Overview 2.4.2 Automotive Interior Leather Type and Applications 2.4.2.1 Type 1 2.4.2.2 Type 2 2.4.3 Boxmark Automotive Interior Leather Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017) 2.5 Kyowa Leather Cloth 2.5.1 Business Overview 2.5.2 Automotive Interior Leather Type and Applications 2.5.2.1 Type 1 2.5.2.2 Type 2 2.5.3 Kyowa Leather Cloth Automotive Interior Leather Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017) 2.6 Exco Technologies 2.6.1 Business Overview 2.6.2 Automotive Interior Leather Type and Applications 2.6.2.1 Type 1 2.6.2.2 Type 2 2.6.3 Exco Technologies Automotive Interior Leather Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017) 2.7 Wollsdorf 2.7.1 Business Overview 2.7.2 Automotive Interior Leather Type and Applications 2.7.2.1 Type 1 2.7.2.2 Type 2 2.7.3 Wollsdorf Automotive Interior Leather Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017) 2.8 JBS 2.8.1 Business Overview 2.8.2 Automotive Interior Leather Type and Applications 2.8.2.1 Type 1 2.8.2.2 Type 2 2.8.3 JBS Automotive Interior Leather Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017) For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com ABOUT US: Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports features an exhaustive list of market research reports from hundreds of publishers worldwide. We boast a database spanning virtually every market category and an even more comprehensive collection of rmaket research reports under these categories and sub-categories. For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com


LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / May 8, 2017 / Lundin Law PC , a shareholder rights firm, announces a class action lawsuit against JBS S.A. ("JBS" or the "Company") (OTCQX: JBSAY) concerning possible violations of federal securities laws between June 2, 2015 and March 17, 2017 inclusive (the "Class Period"). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares during the Class Period should contact the firm prior to the May 22, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline. To participate in this class action lawsuit, click here. You can also call Brian Lundin, Esq., of Lundin Law PC, at 888-713-1033, or e-mail him at [email protected]. No class has been certified in the above action yet. Until a class is certified, you are not considered represented by an attorney. You may also choose to do nothing and be an absent class member. The Complaint states that during the Class Period, JBS made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that its executives bribed regulators and politicians to subvert food inspections of its plants and overlook unsanitary practices, such as processing rotten meat and running plants with traces of salmonella. On March 17, 2017, reports emerged that Brazilian federal police raided the offices of JBS and dozens of other meatpackers following a two-year investigation into alleged bribery of regulators to subvert inspections of their plants and overlook unsanitary practices. Police arrested two JBS employees, among others. JBS stated in a securities filing that three of its plants and one of its employees were targeted in the probe. When this news was announced to the public, JBS' stock price fell materially, which harmed investors according to the Complaint. Lundin Law PC was created by Brian Lundin, a securities litigator based in Los Angeles dedicated to upholding shareholders' rights. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in certain jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.


http://www.zlk.com/pslra-sb/jbs-s-a?wire=1, or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at jlevi@levikorsinsky.com or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or obligation to you. The complaint alleges that, throughout the class period, Defendants issued materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) JBS executives bribed regulators and politicians to subvert food inspections of its plants and overlook unsanitary practices, such as processing rotten meat and running plants with traces of salmonella; and (2) as a result, defendants' statements about JBS's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable bases at all relevant times. On March 17, 2017, news outlets reported that Brazilian federal police raided the offices of JBS and dozens of other meatpackers following a two-year investigation into alleged bribery of regulators to subvert inspections of their plants and overlook unsanitary practices. JBS stated in a securities filing that three of its plants and one of its employees were targeted in the probe. If you suffered a loss in JBS, you have until May 22, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm's attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation, and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.


Lundin Law PC , a shareholder rights firm, announces a class action lawsuit against JBS S.A. ("JBS" or the "Company") (OTCQX: JBSAY) concerning possible violations of federal securities laws between June 2, 2015 and March 17, 2017 inclusive (the "Class Period"). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares during the Class Period should contact the firm prior to the May 22, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline. To participate in this class action lawsuit, click here. You can also call Brian Lundin, Esq., of Lundin Law PC, at 888-713-1033, or e-mail him at brian@lundinlawpc.com. No class has been certified in the above action yet. Until a class is certified, you are not considered represented by an attorney. You may also choose to do nothing and be an absent class member. The Complaint states that during the Class Period, JBS made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that its executives bribed regulators and politicians to subvert food inspections of its plants and overlook unsanitary practices, such as processing rotten meat and running plants with traces of salmonella. On March 17, 2017, reports emerged that Brazilian federal police raided the offices of JBS and dozens of other meatpackers following a two-year investigation into alleged bribery of regulators to subvert inspections of their plants and overlook unsanitary practices. Police arrested two JBS employees, among others. JBS stated in a securities filing that three of its plants and one of its employees were targeted in the probe. When this news was announced to the public, JBS' stock price fell materially, which harmed investors according to the Complaint. Lundin Law PC was created by Brian Lundin, a securities litigator based in Los Angeles dedicated to upholding shareholders' rights. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in certain jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.


NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / May 11, 2017 / The following statement is being issued by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP: To: All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of JBS S.A. ("JBS") (OTCMKTS: JBSAY) . You are hereby notified that a securities class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. To get more information go to: http://www.zlk.com/pslra-sb/jbs-s-a?wire=1 or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or obligation to you. The complaint alleges that throughout the class period Defendants issued materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) JBS executives bribed regulators and politicians to subvert food inspections of its plants and overlook unsanitary practices such as processing rotten meat and running plants with traces of salmonella; and (2) as a result, defendants' statements about JBS's business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable bases at all relevant times. On March 17, 2017, news outlets reported that Brazilian federal police raided the offices of JBS and dozens of other meatpackers following a two-year investigation into alleged bribery of regulators to subvert inspections of their plants and overlook unsanitary practices. JBS stated in a securities filing that three of its plants and one of its employees were targeted in the probe. If you suffered a loss in JBS you have until to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm's attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation, and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.


STEVENSON, Md.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The securities litigation law firm of Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation, announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of purchasers of JBS S.A. (OTCQX: JBSAY) (“JBS” or the “Company”) American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) during the period between June 2, 2015 and March 17, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Investors who wish to become proactively involved in the litigation have until May 22, 2017 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. If you wish to choose counsel to represent you and the class, you must apply to be appointed lead plaintiff and be selected by the Court. The lead plaintiff will direct the litigation and participate in important decisions including whether to accept a settlement for the class in the action. The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in JBS ADRs during the Class Period. Members of the class will be represented by the lead plaintiff and counsel chosen by the lead plaintiff. No class has yet been certified in the above action. The complaint accuses the defendants of violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by virtue of the defendants’ failure to disclose during the Class Period that JBS executives bribed regulators and politicians to subvert food inspections of its plants and overlook unsanitary practices such as processing rotten meat and running plants with traces of salmonella. According to the complaint, following a March 17, 2017 news reports that Brazilian federal police raided the offices of JBS and dozens of other meatpackers following a two-year investigation into alleged bribery of regulators to subvert inspections of their plants and overlook unsanitary practices, the value of JBS shares declined significantly. If you have suffered a loss in excess of $100,000 from investment in JBS ADRs purchased on or after June 2, 2015 and held through the revelation of negative information during and/or at the end of the Class Period and would like to learn more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead plaintiff, without cost or obligation to you, please visit our website at http://www.browerpiven.com/currentsecuritiescases.html. You may also request more information by contacting Brower Piven either by email at hoffman@browerpiven.com or by telephone at (410) 415-6616. Brower Piven also encourages anyone with information regarding the Company’s conduct during the period in question to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. Attorneys at Brower Piven have extensive experience in litigating securities and other class action cases and have been advocating for the rights of shareholders since the 1980s. If you choose to retain counsel, you may retain Brower Piven without financial obligation or cost to you, or you may retain other counsel of your choice. You need take no action at this time to be a member of the class.


Eyler E.C.H.,JBS Inc
American Journal on Addictions | Year: 2013

Background and Objectives Many individuals receiving methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) for opioid addiction also require treatment for acute or chronic pain, and the presence of pain is known to have a negative impact on patient health and function. However, effective pain management in this population is complicated by many factors, including heightened pain sensitivity, high opioid tolerance, illicit substance use, and variable cross-tolerance to opioid pain medications. This article reviews the recent literature on acute and chronic pain among, and pain treatment of, patients receiving MMT for opioid addiction and discusses the implications for effective pain management. Acute pain management among women maintained on methadone during and after labor and delivery is also discussed, as well as common concerns held by patients and providers about appropriate pain management strategies in the context of methadone maintenance and addiction treatment. Methods One hundred nine articles were identified in a PubMed/MEDLINE electronic database search using the following search terms: methadone, methadone maintenance, methadone addiction, pain, pain management, chronic pain, and acute pain. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance, and additional studies were extracted from the reference lists of articles identified in the original search. Results The pain sensitivity and pain responses of MMT patients differ significantly from those of patients not maintained on opioids, and few data are available to guide patient care. Conclusions and Scientific Significance Rigorous studies are needed to identify and evaluate effective pain management approaches for this unique patient population and to improve patient treatment outcomes. Copyright © American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry.


Disclosed is a system for reducing microbial levels on a hide of an animal utilizing means for contacting the hide of an animal with an alkaline solution having a pH of between about 8 and about 13 after stunning the animal, a second means for contacting the hide with a second solution that includes one of water, organic acid or hydrogen peroxide and a means for reusing at least a portion of the alkaline solution or the water/organic acid/hydrogen peroxide.


Patent
JBS Inc | Date: 2013-03-04

Methods and compositions for increasing intestinal transport of nutrients or growth performance in the offspring of an animal are described. More specifically, a feed composition comprising an omega-3 fatty acid-containing composition for increasing intestinal transport of nutrients or growth performance in the offspring of the animal, and methods therefor, are described.


Patent
JBS Inc | Date: 2015-07-21

Methods and compositions for increasing intestinal transport of nutrients or growth performance in the offspring of an animal are described. More specifically, a feed composition comprising an omega-3 fatty acid-containing composition for increasing intestinal transport of nutrients or growth performance in the offspring of the animal, and methods therefor, are described.

Loading JBS Inc collaborators
Loading JBS Inc collaborators