Time filter

Source Type

Sukumaran S.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Int | Dreisigacker S.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Int | Lopes M.,CIMMYT | Chavez P.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Int | Reynolds M.P.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Int
Theoretical and Applied Genetics | Year: 2014

Key message: Through genome-wide association study, loci for grain yield and yield components were identified in chromosomes 5A and 6A in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum).Abstract: Genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted for grain yield (YLD) and yield components on a wheat association mapping initiative (WAMI) population of 287 elite, spring wheat lines grown under temperate irrigated high-yield potential condition in Ciudad Obregón, Mexico, during four crop cycles (from 2009–2010 to 2012–2013). The population was genotyped with high-density Illumina iSelect 90K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) assay. An analysis of traits across subpopulations indicated that lines with 1B/1R translocation had higher YLD, grain weight, and taller plants than lines without the translocation. GWAS using 18,704 SNPs identified 31 loci that explained 5–14 % of the variation in individual traits. We identified SNPs in chromosome 5A and 6A that were significantly associated with yield and yield components. Four loci were detected for YLD in chromosomes 3B, 5A, 5B, and 6A and the locus in 5A explained 5 % of the variation for grain number/m2. The locus for YLD in chromosome 6A also explained 6 % of the variation in grain weight. Loci significantly associated with maturity were identified in chromosomes 2B, 3B, 4B, 4D, and 6A and for plant height in 1A and 6A. Loci were also detected for canopy temperature at grain filling (2D, 4D, 6A), chlorophyll index at grain filling (3B and 6A), biomass (3D and 6A) and harvest index (1D, 1B, and 3B) that explained 5–10 % variation. These markers will be further validated. © 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Source

Li Y.-F.,CAS Chengdu Institute of Biology | Li Y.-F.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Int | Li Y.-F.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences | Wu Y.,CAS Chengdu Institute of Biology | And 2 more authors.
Journal of Cereal Science | Year: 2013

Heat and/or drought stress during cultivation are likely to affect the processing quality of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum). This work examined the effects of drought and heat stress conditions on grain yield and quality parameters of nine durum wheat varieties, grown during two years (2008-09 and 2009-10). Generally, G and E showed main effects on all the parameters whereas the effects of G × E were relatively small. More precipitation in Y09-10 may account for the large differences in parameters observed between crop cycles (Y08-09 and Y09-10). Combined results of the two crop cycles showed that flour protein content (FP) and SDS sedimentation volume (SDSS) increased under both stress conditions, but not significantly. In contrast the gluten strength-related parameters lactic acid retention capacity (LARC) and mixograph peak time (MPT) increased and decreased significantly under drought and heat stress, respectively. Drought and heat stress drastically reduced grain yield (Y) but significantly enhanced flour yellowness (FY). LARC and the swelling index of glutenin (SIG) could be alternative tests to screen for gluten strength. Genotypes and qualtiy parameters performed differently to drought and heat stress, which justifies screening durum wheat for both yield and quality traits under these two abiotic stress conditions. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. Source

Sukumaran S.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Int | Reynolds M.P.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Int | Lopes M.S.,CIMMYT | Crossa J.,International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Int
Crop Science | Year: 2015

Previous research has shown that progress in genetic yield potential is associated with adaptation to agronomic planting density, though its genetic basis has not been addressed before. In the current study, a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) association mapping initiative (WAMI) panel of 287 elite lines was assessed for the effects of plant density on grain yield (YLD), 1000-kernel weight (TKW), and grain number (GNO) in yield plots consisting of four evenly spaced rows. The YLD and GNO of inner (high plant density) rows compared with outer rows (low plant density) indicated a consistent pattern: genotypes that performed best under intense competition (inner rows) responded less to reduced competition (outer rows) while being generally the best performers on aggregate (inner plus outer rows). However, TKW was not affected by plant density. To identify the genetic loci, an adaptation to density index (ADi) was computed as the scaled difference in trait values between inner and outer rows. Results on biplot analysis indicated that ADi was correlated with YLD in high-yielding environments, suggesting that it is a component of high yield potential. Genotyping of the WAMI panel was done through 90K Illumina Bead single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Association mapping employed using 18,104 SNP markers for ADi identified a major locus in chromosome 3B at 71 cM that explained 11.4% variation in ADi for YLD and GNO. Functional marker for ADi will enable identification of the trait in early generations—not otherwise possible in spaced plants typical of pedigree breeding approach—and to select parents for hybrid development. © Crop Science Society of America | 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA All rights reserved. Source

Discover hidden collaborations