Uppsala, Sweden
Uppsala, Sweden

Time filter

Source Type

Nicolazzi E.L.,Bioinformatics and Biostatistical Genomics group | Caprera A.,Bioinformatics and Biostatistical Genomics group | Nazzicari N.,Bioinformatics and Biostatistical Genomics group | Cozzi P.,Bioinformatics and Biostatistical Genomics group | And 13 more authors.
BMC Genomics | Year: 2015

Background: In recent years, the use of genomic information in livestock species for genetic improvement, association studies and many other fields has become routine. In order to accommodate different market requirements in terms of genotyping cost, manufacturers of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, private companies and international consortia have developed a large number of arrays with different content and different SNP density. The number of currently available SNP arrays differs among species: ranging from one for goats to more than ten for cattle, and the number of arrays available is increasing rapidly. However, there is limited or no effort to standardize and integrate array- specific (e.g. SNP IDs, allele coding) and species-specific (i.e. past and current assemblies) SNP information. Results: Here we present SNPchiMp v.3, a solution to these issues for the six major livestock species (cow, pig, horse, sheep, goat and chicken). Original data was collected directly from SNP array producers and specific international genome consortia, and stored in a MySQL database. The database was then linked to an open-access web tool and to public databases. SNPchiMp v.3 ensures fast access to the database (retrieving within/across SNP array data) and the possibility of annotating SNP array data in a user-friendly fashion. Conclusions: This platform allows easy integration and standardization, and it is aimed at both industry and research. It also enables users to easily link the information available from the array producer with data in public databases, without the need of additional bioinformatics tools or pipelines. In recognition of the open-access use of Ensembl resources, SNPchiMp v.3 was officially credited as an Ensembl E!mpowered tool. Availability at http://bioinformatics.tecnoparco.org/SNPchimp. © Nicolazzi et al.


Jorjani H.,Interbull Center | Ajmone-Marsan P.,Catholic University of the Sacred Heart | Stella A.,Parco Tecnologico Padano
Animal | Year: 2015

In this study, the effects of breed composition and predictor dimensionality on the accuracy of direct genomic values (DGV) in a multiple breed (MB) cattle population were investigated. A total of 3559 bulls of three breeds were genotyped at 54 001 single nucleotide polymorphisms: 2093 Holstein (H), 749 Brown Swiss (B) and 717 Simmental (S). DGV were calculated using a principal component (PC) approach for either single (SB) or MB scenarios. Moreover, DGV were computed using all SNP genotypes simultaneously with SNPBLUP model as comparison. A total of seven data sets were used: three with a SB each, three with different pairs of breeds (HB, HS and BS), and one with all the three breeds together (HBS), respectively. Editing was performed separately for each scenario. Reference populations differed in breed composition, whereas the validation bulls were the same for all scenarios. The number of SNPs retained after data editing ranged from 36 521 to 41 360. PCs were extracted from actual genotypes. The total number of retained PCs ranged from 4029 to 7284 in Brown Swiss and HBS respectively, reducing the number of predictors by about 85% (from 82% to 89%). In all, three traits were considered: milk, fat and protein yield. Correlations between deregressed proofs and DGV were used to assess prediction accuracy in validation animals. In the SB scenarios, average DGV accuracy did not substantially change when either SNPBLUP or PC were used. Improvement of DGV accuracy were observed for some traits in Brown Swiss, only when MB reference populations and PC approach were used instead of SB-SNPBLUP (+10% HBS, +16%HB for milk yield and +3% HBS and +7% HB for protein yield, respectively). With the exclusion of the abovementioned cases, similar accuracies were observed using MB reference population, under the PC or SNPBLUP models. Random variation owing to sampling effect or size and composition of the reference population may explain the difficulty in finding a defined pattern in the results. © The Animal Consortium 2014.


PubMed | Affymetrix, Agresearch Ltd., Illumina, Interbull center and 3 more.
Type: | Journal: BMC genomics | Year: 2015

In recent years, the use of genomic information in livestock species for genetic improvement, association studies and many other fields has become routine. In order to accommodate different market requirements in terms of genotyping cost, manufacturers of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, private companies and international consortia have developed a large number of arrays with different content and different SNP density. The number of currently available SNP arrays differs among species: ranging from one for goats to more than ten for cattle, and the number of arrays available is increasing rapidly. However, there is limited or no effort to standardize and integrate array- specific (e.g. SNP IDs, allele coding) and species-specific (i.e. past and current assemblies) SNP information.Here we present SNPchiMp v.3, a solution to these issues for the six major livestock species (cow, pig, horse, sheep, goat and chicken). Original data was collected directly from SNP array producers and specific international genome consortia, and stored in a MySQL database. The database was then linked to an open-access web tool and to public databases. SNPchiMp v.3 ensures fast access to the database (retrieving within/across SNP array data) and the possibility of annotating SNP array data in a user-friendly fashion.This platform allows easy integration and standardization, and it is aimed at both industry and research. It also enables users to easily link the information available from the array producer with data in public databases, without the need of additional bioinformatics tools or pipelines. In recognition of the open-access use of Ensembl resources, SNPchiMp v.3 was officially credited as an Ensembl E!mpowered tool. Availability at http://bioinformatics.tecnoparco.org/SNPchimp.


Nilforooshan M.A.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | Jakobsen J.H.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | Jakobsen J.H.,Interbull Center | Fikse W.F.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | And 3 more authors.
Journal of Dairy Science | Year: 2010

The need to implement a method that can handle multiple traits per country in international genetic evaluations is evident. Today, many countries have implemented multiple-trait national genetic evaluations and they may expect to have their traits simultaneously analyzed in international genetic evaluations. Traits from the same country are residually correlated and the method currently in use, single-trait multiple across-country evaluation (ST-MACE), cannot handle nonzero residual correlations. Therefore, multiple-trait, multiple across-country evaluation (MT-MACE) was proposed to handle several traits from the same country simultaneously. To test the robustness of MT-MACE on real data, female fertility was chosen as a complex trait with low heritability. Data from 7 Holstein populations, 3 with 2 traits and 4 with 1 trait, were used. The differences in the estimated genetic correlations by MT-MACE and the single ST-MACE analysis (average absolute deviation of 0.064) were due to the bias of considering several traits from the same country in the ST-MACE analysis. However, the differences between the estimated genetic correlations by MT-MACE and multiple ST-MACE analyses avoiding more than one trait per country in each analysis (average absolute deviation of 0.066) were due to the lack of analysis of the correlated traits from the same country together and using the reported within-country genetic correlations. Applying MT-MACE resulted in reliability gain in international genetic evaluations, which was different from trait to trait and from bull to bull. The average reliability gain by MT-MACE over ST-MACE was 3.0 points for domestic bulls and 6.3 points for foreign bulls. Even countries with 1 trait benefited from the joint analysis of traits from the 2-trait countries. Another superiority of MT-MACE over ST-MACE is that the bulls that do not have national genetic evaluation for some traits from multiple trait countries will receive international genetic evaluations for those traits. Rank correlations were high between ST-MACE and MT-MACE when considering all bulls. However, the situation was different for the top 100 bulls. Simultaneous analysis of traits from the same country affected bull ranks, especially for top 100 bulls. Multi-trait MACE is a recommendable and robust method for international genetic evaluations and is appropriate for handling multiple traits per country, which can increase the reliability of international genetic evaluations. © 2010 American Dairy Science Association.


Battagin M.,University of Padua | Forabosco F.,Interbull Center | Penasa M.,University of Padua | Cassandro M.,University of Padua
Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus | Year: 2011

The aim of this paper is to investigate across country genetic correlations of conformation traits of 21 Holstein bull populations, using cluster analysis. Data consisted of across country genetic correlations of 18 conformation traits estimated by Interbull for the April 2011 routine genetic evaluation. For cluster analysis, the distance measure (d ij) between countries i and j was calculated as d ij=1-rG 2 ij, where rG ij is the genetic correlation between countries i and j. Traits showed different mean distances with the lowest value for udder depth (0.062) and the highest for locomotion (0.441). For traits with similar definition further investigation is needed to understand differences within cluster. Also, more attention needs to be paid to countries that define or record traits differently from what is suggested by World Holstein Friesian Federation.


Loberg A.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | Durr J.W.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | Durr J.W.,Interbull Center | Fikse W.F.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | And 3 more authors.
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics | Year: 2015

The amount of variance captured in genetic estimations may depend on whether a pedigree-based or genomic relationship matrix is used. The purpose of this study was to investigate the genetic variance as well as the variance of predicted genetic merits (PGM) using pedigree-based or genomic relationship matrices in Brown Swiss cattle. We examined a range of traits in six populations amounting to 173 population-trait combinations. A main aim was to determine how using different relationship matrices affect variance estimation. We calculated ratios between different types of estimates and analysed the impact of trait heritability and population size. The genetic variances estimated by REML using a genomic relationship matrix were always smaller than the variances that were similarly estimated using a pedigree-based relationship matrix. The variances from the genomic relationship matrix became closer to estimates from a pedigree relationship matrix as heritability and population size increased. In contrast, variances of predicted genetic merits obtained using a genomic relationship matrix were mostly larger than variances of genetic merit predicted using pedigree-based relationship matrix. The ratio of the genomic to pedigree-based PGM variances decreased as heritability and population size rose. The increased variance among predicted genetic merits is important for animal breeding because this is one of the factors influencing genetic progress. © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.


Nilforooshan M.A.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | Fikse W.F.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | Berglund B.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | Jakobsen J.H.,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | And 3 more authors.
Journal of Dairy Science | Year: 2011

The current method in use for international genetic evaluations, called single-trait multiple across-country evaluation (ST-MACE), does not consider residual covariances among traits, making possible only the inclusion of one trait per country in an analysis. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of bias resulting from treating traits from the same country as nationally independent in an international genetic evaluation. Data from the September 2007 Interbull test evaluation for Holstein female fertility traits were used. Data included were 1 trait from Belgium, Switzerland, Spain, and the United States of America, and 2 traits from Canada, Germany-Austria, and Denmark-Finland-Sweden. The biased results were obtained from a 10-variate ST-MACE analysis including all country traits. The unbiased results were obtained from 8 different 7-variate ST-MACE analyses, each including only 1 trait per country. Average absolute bias in the genetic correlations among 2-trait countries (0.11) was higher than for between 1-trait countries and 2-trait countries (0.07) and for among 1-trait countries (0.03). The results of the biased and the unbiased analyses were different, not only due to bias, but also because of different number of traits involved in the analyses. Differences were considerable (on average, 0.08 to 6.91) for reliabilities, which were higher for traits with lower heritability. Average differences were minor (-0.04 to 0.03 standard deviations) for predicted genetic merits. However, for the top 100 bulls in each country trait, these differences were important (on average, -0.26 to 0.11 standard deviation of predicted genetic merit), which caused considerable changes in bull rankings. The results of this study showed that the effect of bias, caused by ignoring covariances from multiple-trait national models in an ST-MACE analysis, is of such a magnitude that necessitates the use of another method such as multiple-trait multiple across-country evaluation. © 2011 American Dairy Science Association.

Loading Interbull Center collaborators
Loading Interbull Center collaborators