Laporte S.,Jean Monnet University |
Laporte S.,French Institute of Health and Medical Research |
Squifflet P.,International Drug Development Institute IDDI |
Baroux N.,Institute Cancerologie Of La Loire |
And 9 more authors.
Objectives: To investigate whether progression-free survival (PFS) can be considered a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design: Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Setting: Five randomised controlled trials comparing docetaxel-based chemotherapy with vinorelbine-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of NSCLC. Participants: 2331 patients with advanced NSCLC. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Surrogacy of PFS for OS was assessed through the association between these endpoints and between the treatment effects on these endpoints. The surrogate threshold effect was the minimum treatment effect on PFS required to predict a non-zero treatment effect on OS. Results: The median follow-up of patients still alive was 23.4 months. Median OS was 10 months and median PFS was 5.5 months. The treatment effects on PFS and OS were correlated, whether using centres (R2=0.62, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.72) or prognostic strata (R2=0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.84) as units of analysis. The surrogate threshold effect was a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.49 using centres or 0.53 using prognostic strata. Conclusions: These analyses provide only modest support for considering PFS as an acceptable surrogate for OS in patients with advanced NSCLC. Only treatments that have a major impact on PFS (risk reduction of at least 50%) would be expected to also have a significant effect on OS. Whether these results also apply to targeted therapies is an open question that requires independent evaluation. Source
Italiano A.,Institute Bergonie |
Cioffi A.,Institute Gustave Roussy |
Cioffi A.,Mount Sinai School of Medicine |
Poulette S.,University of Bordeaux 1 |
And 14 more authors.
Data about the patterns of care and the specific outcome of elderly patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are almost nonexistent. Between 2001 and 2009, 44 patients ≥75 years old with advanced GISTs started first-line imatinib (400 mg/day) in seven participating institutions. Clinical data were collected by reviewing medical records and were entered in a comprehensive database. During the same period, 160 patients with advanced GIST (136 patients <75 years old, 24 patients ≥75 years old) had access to an imatinib blood level testing program. Imatinib plasma concentration (patient dose 400 mg/day) tests were centralized in a single laboratory. Median age was 78 years old (range 75-86). Thirty-six patients (82 %) experienced at least one adverse event (Table 2). Drug-related adverse events were mainly of grades 1 and 2 and were medically manageable. Permanent dose reduction (200-300 mg/day) was required for 20 patients (45.5 %) and was significantly more frequent for patients with performance status (PS) ≥2: 33.5 versus 8.5 %, p = 0.04. Eight patients (18 %) required imatinib interruption for intolerance. Median PFS was 34.4 months (95 % CI 11.5-57.4) (Fig. 1). Median overall survival (OS) was 50.3 months (95 % CI 37-63.5). Performance status <2 was the sole pre-therapeutic factor associated with improved OS. No correlation was found between comorbidities and tolerance or outcome. Imatinib trough plasma concentrations increase with age, although this correlation did not reach statistical significance. First-line imatinib is a feasible and effective treatment in patients with advanced GISTs ≥75 years. Aging seems to have only a moderate impact on imatinib pharmacokinetics. Overall survival is similar to that of younger patients. Comorbidities did not result in increased incidence of toxicity. Careful follow-up regarding tolerance issues should be considered in elderly patients with poor PS. © 2012 Springer-Verlag France. Source