De Cooman G.,Ghent University |
Miranda E.,University of Oviedo |
Artificial Intelligence | Year: 2011
There is no unique extension of the standard notion of probabilistic independence to the case where probabilities are indeterminate or imprecisely specified. Epistemic independence is an extension that formalises the intuitive idea of mutual irrelevance between different sources of information. This gives epistemic independence very wide scope as well as appeal: this interpretation of independence is often taken as natural also in precise-probabilistic contexts. Nevertheless, epistemic independence has received little attention so far. This paper develops the foundations of this notion for variables assuming values in finite spaces. We define (epistemically) independent products of marginals (or possibly conditionals) and show that there always is a unique least-committal such independent product, which we call the independent natural extension. We supply an explicit formula for it, and study some of its properties, such as associativity, marginalisation and external additivity, which are basic tools to work with the independent natural extension. Additionally, we consider a number of ways in which the standard factorisation formula for independence can be generalised to an imprecise-probabilistic context. We show, under some mild conditions, that when the focus is on least-committal models, using the independent natural extension is equivalent to imposing a so-called strong factorisation property. This is an important outcome for applications as it gives a simple tool to make sure that inferences are consistent with epistemic independence judgements. We discuss the potential of our results for applications in Artificial Intelligence by recalling recent work by some of us, where the independent natural extension was applied to graphical models. It has allowed, for the first time, the development of an exact linear-time algorithm for the imprecise probability updating of credal trees. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms | Year: 2011
The Dichotomy Conjecture for Constraint Satisfaction Problems has been verified for conservative problems (or, equivalently, for list homomorphism problems) by Andrei Bulatov. An earlier case of this dichotomy, for list homomorphisms to undirected graphs, came with an elegant structural distinction between the tractable and intractable cases. Such structural characterization is absent in Bulatov's classification, and Bulatov asked whether one cam be found. We provide an answer in the case of digraphs. In the process we give forbidden structure characterizations of the existence of certain polymorphisms relevant in Bulatov's dichotomy classification. The key concept we introduce is that of a digraph asteroidal triple (DAT). The dichotomy then takes the following form. If a digraph H has a DAT, then the list homomorphism problem for H is NP-complete; and a DAT-free digraph H has a polynomial time solvable list homomorphism problem. DAT-free digraphs can be recognized in polynomial time. It follows from our results that the list homomorphism problem for a DAT-free digraph H can be solved by a local consistency algorithm (of width (2,3)).
Ambuhl C.,University of Liverpool |
Mastrolilli M.,IDSIA |
Svensson O.,KTH Royal Institute of Technology
SIAM Journal on Computing | Year: 2011
We consider the Minimum Linear Arrangement problem and the (Uniform) Sparsest Cut problem. So far, these two notorious NP-hard graph problems have resisted all attempts to prove inapproximability results. We show that they have no polynomial time approximation scheme, unless NP-complete problems can be solved in randomized subexponential time. Furthermore, we show that the same techniques can be used for the Maximum Edge Biclique problem, for which we obtain a hardness factor similar to previous results but under a more standard assumption. Copyright © by SIAM.
Chalermsook P.,IDSIA |
Laekhanukit B.,McGill University |
Nanongkai D.,University of Vienna
Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms | Year: 2013
Graph product is a fundamental tool with rich applications in both graph theory and theoretical computer science. It is usually studied in the form f(G * H) where G and H are graphs, * is a graph product and f is a graph property. For example, if f is the independence number and * is the disjunctive product, then the product is known to be multiplicative: f(G * H) = f(G)f(H). In this paper, we study graph products in the following non-standard form: f((G⊕H)*J) where G, H and J are graphs, ⊕ and * are two different graph products and f is a graph property. We show that if f is the induced and semi-induced matching number, then for some products ⊕ and *, it is subadditive in the sense that f((G⊕H) * J) ≤ f(G * J) + f(H * J). Moreover, when f is the poset dimension number, it is almost subadditive. As applications of this result (we only need J = K2 here), we obtain tight hardness of approximation for various problems in discrete mathematics and computer science: bipartite induced and semi-induced matching (a.k.a. maximum expanding sequences), poset dimension, maximum feasible subsystem with 0/1 coefficients, unit-demand min-buying and single-minded pricing, donation center location, boxicity, cubicity, threshold dimension and independent packing. Copyright © SIAM.
Miranda E.,University of Oviedo |
Zaffalon M.,IDSIA |
De Cooman G.,Ghent University
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning | Year: 2012
At the foundations of probability theory lies a question that has been open since de Finetti framed it in 1930: whether or not an uncertainty model should be required to be conglomerable. Conglomerability is related to accepting infinitely many conditional bets. Walley is one of the authors who have argued in favor of conglomerability, while de Finetti rejected the idea. In this paper we study the extension of the conglomerability condition to two types of uncertainty models that are more general than the ones envisaged by de Finetti: sets of desirable gambles and coherent lower previsions. We focus in particular on the weakest (i.e., the least-committal) of those extensions, which we call the conglomerable natural extension. The weakest extension that does not take conglomerability into account is simply called the natural extension. We show that taking the natural extension of assessments after imposing conglomerability - the procedure adopted in Walley's theory - does not yield, in general, the conglomerable natural extension (but it does so in the case of the marginal extension). Iterating this process of imposing conglomerability and taking the natural extension produces a sequence of models that approach the conglomerable natural extension, although it is not known, at this point, whether this sequence converges to it. We give sufficient conditions for this to happen in some special cases, and study the differences between working with coherent sets of desirable gambles and coherent lower previsions. Our results indicate that it is necessary to rethink the foundations of Walley's theory of coherent lower previsions for infinite partitions of conditioning events. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.