Germantown, MD, United States
Germantown, MD, United States

Time filter

Source Type

Satellite backhaul means getting data of program from one location which has to be further distributed over large network. For example, a live television program has to be telecast from Germany throughout the world and the program has to be further distributed through the satellite terminals. The program signals have to be backhauled by some means of network (optical fiber or by other satellite system) and hence Satellite backhaul enables to get non-live video and audio files which are broadcasted. The mobile industry has played an important role in cellular backhaul market through satellite. Mobile technology has been advancing at a phenomenal rate. Nowadays mobile devices are the primary way to access the internet by an individual. For the mobile operators, the key challenge is to fetch some innovative technologies to backhaul voice and data traffic. With the increasing data traffic challenges, 3G and 4G technologies are deployed for the competences of existing backhaul network and this trend is expected to surge in years to come. In urban areas, many different technologies are being implemented to deal with expanding demand including the use of metro Ethernet network, microwave network and fiber optics. However, it is difficult to implement these services in rural areas due to high cost associated with the backhaul technology (fiber and microwave). Applications such as YouTube, WhatsApp, twitter and many other popular live streaming and online surfing apps are driving the bandwidth demand. This demand gives an opportunity for the various transmission service providers to bring innovative technology to the market. The emergency communication cells over the satellite are being developed by the satellite backhaul service providers and these emergency communication cells are predominantly implemented in only those locations which have significant cellular connectivity. These type of solutions are usually owned and operated by cellular operators where mobile cell towers are connected with satellite backhaul solution. Asia Pacific (APAC) region currently leads the satellite backhaul market due to emerging economies such as China and India and need for connectivity among the masses. Further Europe and Middle East and Africa (MEA) regions are expected to witness modest growth in satellite backhaul technology due to the diversity in government’s economic performance and existing infrastructure which includes combination of optical fibers and microwave networks. The market is segmented by type of transmission medium, backhaul technology and geography. Transmission medium segmentation includes wired and wireless. Segmentation based on type of backhaul technology includes fiber, copper, microwave and millimeter wave and by geography includes North America, Europe, Middle East and Africa (MEA), Asia Pacific (APAC) and Latin America. Some of the key players operating in the global satellite backhaul market includes Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd, VT iDirect, Inc., Avanti Communications Group plc., SES S.A., Hughes Network Systems LLC., Intelsat and O3b Networks. The report offers a comprehensive evaluation of the market. It does so via in-depth insights, understanding market evolution by tracking historical developments, and analyzing the present scenario and future projections based on optimistic and likely scenarios. Each research report serves as a repository of analysis and information for every facet of the market, including but not limited to: Regional markets, technology developments, types, applications, and the competitive landscape.


News Article | November 29, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

The Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Research Report 2016 is a valuable source of insightful data for business strategists. It provides the Oilfield Communication Equipment industry overview with growth analysis and historical & futuristic cost, revenue, demand and supply data (as applicable). The research analysts provide an elaborate description of the value chain and its distributor analysis. This Oilfield Communication Equipment market study provides comprehensive data which enhances the understanding, scope and application of this report. This report provides comprehensive analysis of lKey market segments and sub-segments lEvolving market trends and dynamics lChanging supply and demand scenarios lQuantifying market opportunities through market sizing and market forecasting lTracking current trends/opportunities/challenges lCompetitive insights lOpportunity mapping in terms of technological breakthroughs The Major players reported in the market include: Alcatel-Lucent S.A. (France) ERF Wireless, Inc. (US) Halliburton (US) Harris CapRock Communications Inc. (US) Hermes Datacommunications International Ltd. (UK) Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (China) Hughes Network Systems LLC (US) Inmarsat plc (UK) ITC Global (US) Redline Communications Group (Canada) RigNet, Inc. (US) Weatherford International (US)      ... Reasons for Buying this Report This report provides pin-point analysis for changing competitive dynamics It provides a forward looking perspective on different factors driving or restraining market growth It provides a six-year forecast assessed on the basis of how the market is predicted to grow It helps in understanding the key product segments and their future It provides pin point analysis of changing competition dynamics and keeps you ahead of competitors It helps in making informed business decisions by having complete insights of market and by making in-depth analysis of market segments It provides distinctive graphics and exemplified SWOT analysis of major market segments Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Research Report 2016 Chapter 1 Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Overview     1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Oilfield Communication Equipment     1.2 Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Segmentation by Type       1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Oilfield Communication Equipment by Type in 2015       1.2.1 Type I       1.2.2 Type II       1.2.3 Type III     1.3 Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Segmentation by Application       1.3.1 Oilfield Communication Equipment Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015       1.3.2 Application I       1.3.3 Application II       1.3.4 Application III     1.4 Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Segmentation by Regions       1.4.1 North America       1.4.2 China       1.4.3 Europe       1.4.4 Southeast Asia       1.4.5 Japan       1.4.6 India     1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Oilfield Communication Equipment (2011-2021) Chapter 2 Global Economic Impact on Oilfield Communication Equipment Industry     2.1 Global Macroeconomic Environment Analysis       2.1.1 Global Macroeconomic Analysis       2.1.2 Global Macroeconomic Environment Development Trend     2.2 Global Macroeconomic Environment Analysis by Regions     2.3 Effects to Oilfield Communication Equipment Industry Chapter 3 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Competition by Manufacturers     3.1 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)     3.2 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)     3.3 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)     3.4 Manufacturers Oilfield Communication Equipment Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type     3.5 Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Competitive Situation and Trends       3.5.1 Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Concentration Rate       3.5.2 Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers       3.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Chapter 4 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2011-2016)     4.1 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Production by Region (2011-2016)     4.2 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Production Market Share by Region (2011-2016)     4.3 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2011-2016)     4.4 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)     4.5 North America Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)     4.6 Europe Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)     4.7 China Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)     4.8 Japan Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)     4.9 Southeast Asia Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)     4.10 India Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) Chapter 5 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)     5.1 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Consumption by Regions (2011-2016)     5.2 North America Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)     5.3 Europe Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)     5.4 China Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)     5.5 Japan Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)     5.6 Southeast Asia Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)     5.7 India Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) Chapter 6 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type     6.1 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Production and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)     6.2 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)     6.3 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Price by Type (2011-2016)     6.4 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Production Growth by Type (2011-2016) Chapter 7 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Market Analysis by Application     7.1 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Consumption and Market Share by Application (2011-2016)     7.2 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2011-2016)     7.3 Market Drivers and Opportunities       7.3.1 Potential Applications       7.3.2 Emerging Markets/Countries Chapter 8 Global Oilfield Communication Equipment Manufacturers Analysis     8.1 Alcatel-Lucent S.A. (France)       8.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.1.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.1.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.1.4 Business Overview     8.2 ERF Wireless, Inc. (US)       8.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.2.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.2.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.2.4 Business Overview     8.3 Halliburton (US)       8.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.3.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.3.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.3.4 Business Overview     8.4 Harris CapRock Communications Inc. (US)       8.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.4.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.4.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.4.4 Business Overview     8.5 Hermes Datacommunications International Ltd. (UK)       8.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.5.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.5.4 Business Overview     8.6 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (China)       8.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.6.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.6.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.6.4 Business Overview     8.7 Hughes Network Systems LLC (US)       8.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.7.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.7.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.7.4 Business Overview     8.8 Inmarsat plc (UK)       8.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.8.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.8.4 Business Overview     8.9 ITC Global (US)       8.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.9.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.9.4 Business Overview     8.10 Redline Communications Group (Canada)       8.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors       8.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification       8.10.3 Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)       8.10.4 Business Overview     8.11 RigNet, Inc. (US)     8.12 Weatherford International (US) Get It Now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=752907


According to StratisticsMRC, the global Maritime Satellite Communication market is estimated at $2.25 billion in 2015 and is expected to reach $4.41 billion by 2022 growing at a CAGR of 10.1% from 2015 to 2022. Increasing need for enhanced data communication and extensive use of maritime satellite communication are the factors propelling the market growth. However, low awareness among users and huge infrastructure cost to support satellite communication are hampering the market. Bridging satellite and cellular communication technology is the opportunity for market growth. By Service, video communication is expected to show healthy growth to reach highest CAGR during forecast period attributed to increasing usage of HD TV’s, video conferences and more. Passenger ships are expected to move at highest CAGR in end user segment owing to increase in ship travellers across the globe. Europe accounted for huge market share in maritime satellite communication market due to high demand. While, Asia Pacific is expected to be fastest growing region during forecast period, because of low rate of adoption in this region. Some of the key players in the market include Hughes Network Systems LLC, Globecomm Systems Inc., Harris Caprock Communications, Inc., Iridium Communications, Inc., Navarino, Inmarsat PLC., MTN, Thuraya Telecommunications Company, KVH Industries, Inc., VT Idirect, Inc., Network Innovation, Viasat, Speedcast, Royal Imtech N.V. and Nsslglobal. Regions Covered: • North America o US o Canada o Mexico • Europe o Germany o France o Italy o UK  o Spain   o Rest of Europe     • Asia Pacific o Japan        o China        o India        o Australia        o New Zealand       o Rest of Asia Pacific     • Rest of the World o Middle East o Brazil o Argentina o South Africa o Egypt What our report offers: - Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments - Market share analysis of the top industry players - Strategic recommendations for the new entrants - Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets - Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations) - Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations - Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends - Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments - Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements


Gopal R.,Hughes Network Systems LLC | Cynamon C.,Space Systems Loral LLC
31st AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference, ICSSC 2013 | Year: 2013

Today's satellite-based sensing can be transformed into a ubiquitous and cost effective capability with the use of a network-centric architecture. This architecture provides interoperability across multiple sensors, either LEO satellites or hosted payloads on LEO satellites, generic GEO communications satellites, multi-purpose gateways, cloud-based computing, and universal end-product dissemination. A key differentiator of this architectural approach is the use of the Ku-and Ka-band GEO communications satellite systems that can relay LEO-sensing data to the ground for processing and distribution. This architecture, with automated hand-offs across multiple GEO satellites, reduces data delivery latency and costs with the use of the existing GEO constellation and gateways worldwide. A local buffering mechanism on the LEO sensors preserve temporarily stored data (for future replay) during hand-offs or when there is no GEO satellite coverage. Our standards-based architecture comprising Ku/Ka-band LEO-GEO links strikes an effective balance among risk, functionality, and operational costs compared to the use of other (bandwidth constrained and expensive) RF bands and purpose built GEO relay satellites.


Hong S.G.,Hughes Network Systems LLC | Schulzrinne H.,Columbia University
IEEE Communications Magazine | Year: 2013

We propose a signaling architecture for network traffic authorization, called Permission-Based Sending (PBS), aiming to prevent DoS attacks and other forms of unauthorized traffic. Toward this goal, PBS takes a hybrid approach: a proactive approach of explicit permissions and a reactive approach of monitoring and countering attacks. PBS uses a concept similar to existing capability-based systems in the manner in which the sender should get authorization (permission) from a receiver for flows. However, PBS introduces new and practical approaches to overcome the deficiencies (the difficulty of obtaining permission and incompatibility with current network architecture) of those systems. On-path signaling enables easy installation and management of the permission state. Working on current network protocols supports compatibility and allows PBS to be deployed in existing networks. In addition, a monitoring mechanism provides a second line of defense against attacks. Our analysis and performance evaluation show that PBS is an effective and scalable solution to prevent several kinds of attacks, and improves the resilience of the system against network failure by using soft-state mechanisms. © 1979-2012 IEEE.


Gopal R.,Hughes Network Systems LLC | Ravishankar C.,Hughes Network Systems LLC
32nd AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference, ICSSC 2014 | Year: 2014

Software Defined Satellite Network (SDSN), similar to SDN[1], decouplesdata plane functions from control planefunctions. SDSNbenefitsfrom logically centralized network state knowledgeand decision makingthatenablesoptimalresource allocationsfor dynamic packet processing and transmission.An SDSN networknodeusesforwarding tables configured bya centralized system controllerto governpacket routingwithembeddedLayer 2switchwithout requiringelaborate Layer 3 controlplanesoftwareimplementationin every satellite node.Besides upper layer packet queuing and switching, SDSNs also involveradiotransmission links and encompassassociated modulation, coding, and resource allocation functionswithdynamic control. SDSN architectural conceptscan be illustratedwith the SPACEWAYsystemwhichusesa GEOsatellitecomprisingKa band spotbeamsand a 10 Gbpspacket processingswitch. The onboard switching functionisorchestratedby a ground-based system controller, withcentralized support for addressing, routing, and packet flow management. The SDSN building blocksand performance objectives can be extended toaddress inter-satellitepacket routing usinga constellation of satellites with inter-satellite links and enhanced routingand resource managementfunctionat the controller. Besides GEO, LEO, and MEOsatellites the SDSN architecture andtechniques for addressing, routing, QoS, traffic engineering, and resource managementcan also be utilizedfor aerial and high altitude networking platforms.


Gopal R.,Hughes Network Systems LLC | Fang R.J.,Hughes Network Systems LLC
Proceedings - IEEE Military Communications Conference MILCOM | Year: 2012

This paper proposes multiple high capacity Ka satellite design options that can be used for resilient communications architectures for national security. These design options are strongly influenced by the emergence of high-throughput commercial narrow beam satellites that have recently been placed in service. Resilience requires rapid deployment of aggregate capacity, support for multiple connectivity patterns, flexibility in coverage areas including hot spots with high capacity density, compatibility with heterogeneous ground segments, and finally support for a variety of applications including fixed, ground mobile, maritime, and airborne. The paper analyzes performance of candidate architectures for driving requirements, provides costs estimates for acquisition and operations, and makes specific recommendations consistent with military interest in disaggregation of missions with smaller satellites and enhanced use of commercial SATCOM for government use. © 2012 IEEE.


Gopal R.,Hughes Network Systems LLC
30th AIAA International Communications Satellite System Conference (ICSSC), 2012 | Year: 2012

This paper analyzes management architectures that can increase the utilization of raw transport capacity while preserving service-level agreement for the users of a communications satellite system. An advanced management function can continually assess and exploit the potential variability in the offered traffic and provide differential transport rates on the basis of time, applications, and users. Adaptive system configuration enables temporal smoothing of the transported traffic and enhances the overall utilization of system capacity. Higher data rates consistent with the subscribed service can be supported for specific users and time durations. These management techniques involve comprehensive situational awareness at various levels of elastic traffic granularity and corresponding dynamic control of the data plane transport protocols. For inelastic traffic, packet-flow-level dynamic allocation and preemption of system resources can address both higher utilization and service assurance. Smarter utilization of raw system capacity results in higher rates when needed by specific users, and creates a transformational environment for cost-effective and commercially viable satellite-based broadband services. The paper illustrates these efficiency gains by considering a reference satellite system using Ka spot beams along with a mix of traffic load and also includes a discussion on how these gains can be applied to other application domains. © 2012 by the authors. Published by FGM Events LLC and distributed by AIAA with permission. All other rights reserved.


Hong S.G.,Hughes Network Systems LLC | Su C.-J.,Hughes Network Systems LLC
2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015 | Year: 2015

Satellite networks, which provide high bandwidth but have high latency, suffer from performance degradation for secure web access (HTTPS). The use of multiple networks, which combines a satellite network with a low latency network, becomes an attractive method for a satellite Internet Service Provider (ISP) to provide better network services. We propose a novel and practical multiple networking system, called Accelerating Network Services by Adding a Short Path (ASAP). ASAP accelerates secure web page loading with a little help from a low latency network while exploiting the high bandwidth of a satellite network. By using a middlebox approach with a multipath tunneling mechanism, ASAP is deployable to the current Internet architecture without modifying core networks and protocols. Phase-based classification mechanism of ASAP enhances network services while minimizing and controlling the data usage of the auxiliary, low latency network to reduce the operation cost for a satellite ISP, which leases the auxiliary network. Our performance evaluation shows that ASAP is an effective solution to reduce secure web page load time while reducing and controlling the data usage of networks. Our real-world testbed shows that ASAP works with the current Internet infrastructure. © 2015 IEEE.


Gopal R.,Hughes Network Systems LLC
International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking | Year: 2011

This paper introduces a net-centric architecture based on ETSI and TIA Regenerative Satellite Mesh-A (RSM-A) standard that uses satellites with on-board packet switching. An Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) IP protocol family-based extension of RSM-A for enhanced user interoperability, combined with multiple spot beam satellite implementation facilitates higher capacity, easy deployment and full mesh terminal-to-terminal operation that is required for managing emergency situations. This Net-centric Satellite Mesh (NSM) architecture adequately addresses the current and evolving networking needs for emergency-management information systems that can generate high data rate and real-time multi-media traffic. The NSM architecture supports the evolving IETF Emergency Telecommunications Service standards with packet flow-level admission control for guaranteed packet quality-of-service needed by real-time unicast and multicast traffic over satellite networks. The multi-plane architectural discussion is supported with measurements of selected end-to-end application behavior that validate the technical capabilities of NSM by using a pioneering Ka band satellite system, based on RSM-A, which has recently been deployed in North America. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Loading Hughes Network Systems LLC collaborators
Loading Hughes Network Systems LLC collaborators