Salinas M.,Hospital Universitario Of San Juan Of Alicante |
Salinas M.,University Miguel Hernandez |
Lopez-Garrigos M.,Hospital Universitario Of San Juan Of Alicante |
Uris J.,University of Alicante |
And 35 more authors.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry | Year: 2013
Background: It is necessary to achieve a reduction in the number of requests for laboratory tests by improving the appropriateness of testing behaviour. The aim of the study was, first, to compare laboratory requiring patterns for emergency department (ED) patients in clinical laboratories of different institutions in Spain; second, to design an appropriateness pre-pre-analytical quality control report based on appropriateness indicators. Methods: A call for data was posted on a website.We obtained production statistics for the year 2010 from emergency laboratories at 36 hospitals. Two types of appropriateness indicators were calculated: test request per 1000 ED admissions or related test requesting ratios. In order to explore the inter-practice variability in tests requests, the 'index of variability' was calculated. A pre-pre-analytical quality control report was designed, prepared and sent to each participating laboratory. The savings generated, if each Health-care Department would have achieved the appropriate indicator standard, were calculated. Results: The rate of request of the stat tests ranged from 44 to 412 per 1000 ED patient admissions. There was a high and peculiar dispersion of related test requesting ratio results. If every single laboratory would have achieved the appropriate indicator, we would have saved 1,019,230 urea, 302,511 AST and 316,161 CK unnecessary tests. Conclusions: There are large variations of test requesting in the emergency setting. An appropriateness pre-preanalytical quality control report was useful for comparing requesting patterns. The study shows the need to unify demand. The key to achieve this goal will be interdepartmental cooperation between ED clinicians and laboratory professionals. © The Author(s) 2013. Source
Carpintero P.,University of Cordoba, Spain |
Caeiro J.R.,University of Santiago de Compostela |
Carpintero R.,University of Cordoba, Spain |
Morales A.,University of Cordoba, Spain |
And 2 more authors.
World Journal of Orthopaedics | Year: 2014
Nowadays, fracture surgery represents a big part of the orthopedic surgeon workload, and usually has associated major clinical and social cost implications. These fractures have several complications. Some of these are medical, and other related to the surgical treatment itself. Medical complications may affect around 20% of patients with hip fracture. Cognitive and neurological alterations, cardiopulmonary affections (alone or combined), venous thromboembolism, gastrointestinal tract bleeding, urinary tract complications, perioperative anemia, electrolytic and metabolic disorders, and pressure scars are the most important medical complications after hip surgery in terms of frequency, increase of length of stay and perioperative mortality. Complications arising from hip fracture surgery are fairly common, and vary depending on whether the fracture is intracapsular or extracapsular. The main problems in intracapsular fractures are biological: vascularization of the femoral head, and lack of periosteum -a major contributor to fracture healing- in the femoral neck. In extracapsular fractures, by contrast, the problem is mechanical, and relates to load-bearing. Early surgical fixation, the role of anti-thromboembolic and anti-infective prophylaxis, good pain control at the perioperative, detection and management of delirium, correct urinary tract management, avoidance of malnutrition, vitamin D supplementation, osteoporosis treatment and advancement of early mobilization to improve functional recovery and falls prevention are basic recommendations for an optimal maintenance of hip fractured patients. © 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. Source
Diaz-Martin A.,University of Seville |
Martinez-Gonzalez M.L.,Autonomous University of Barcelona |
Ferrer R.,University of Barcelona |
Ferrer R.,CIBER ISCIII |
And 109 more authors.
Critical Care | Year: 2012
Introduction: Although early institution of adequate antimicrobial therapy is lifesaving in sepsis patients, optimal antimicrobial strategy has not been established. Moreover, the benefit of combination therapy over monotherapy remains to be determined. Our aims are to describe patterns of empiric antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis, assessing the impact of combination therapy, including antimicrobials with different mechanisms of action, on mortality.Methods: This is a Spanish national multicenter study, analyzing all patients admitted to ICUs who received antibiotics within the first 6 hours of diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. Antibiotic-prescription patterns in community-acquired infections and nosocomial infections were analyzed separately and compared. We compared the impact on mortality of empiric antibiotic treatment, including antibiotics with different mechanisms of action, termed different-class combination therapy (DCCT), with that of monotherapy and any other combination therapy possibilities (non-DCCT).Results: We included 1,372 patients, 1,022 (74.5%) of whom had community-acquired sepsis and 350 (25.5%) of whom had nosocomial sepsis. The most frequently prescribed antibiotic agents were β-lactams (902, 65.7%) and carbapenems (345, 25.1%). DCCT was administered to 388 patients (28.3%), whereas non-DCCT was administered to 984 (71.7%). The mortality rate was significantly lower in patients administered DCCTs than in those who were administered non-DCCTs (34% versus 40%; P = 0.042). The variables independently associated with mortality were age, male sex, APACHE II score, and community origin of the infection. DCCT was a protective factor against in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR), 0.699; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.522 to 0.936; P = 0.016), as was urologic focus of infection (OR, 0.241; 95% CI, 0.102 to 0.569; P = 0.001).Conclusions: β-Lactams, including carbapenems, are the most frequently prescribed antibiotics in empiric therapy in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Administering a combination of antimicrobials with different mechanisms of action is associated with decreased mortality. © 2012 Dias-Martin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Source
Alonso J.V.,Emergency Medicine |
Del Pozo F.J.F.,Emergency Medicine |
Simon J.C.,Primary Care Health Center |
Valenzuela S.,Hospital Reina Sofia |
And 2 more authors.
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases | Year: 2015
Background demonstrate the importance of considering limb-shaking syndrome in the differential diagnosis of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with hyperkinetic movements. Methods In this article, we describe a diagnostic challenge in the ED in which a patient presents with hyperkinetic movements that are initially diagnosed as hemichorea-hemiballismus (HCHB) but are subsequently found to be limb-shaking syndrome with important therapeutic opportunities. Results Following a diagnosis of left carotid obstruction, the patient underwent left carotid endarterectomy 5 days after admission. Six months after surgery, the patient had no further symptoms, and an ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance angiography have confirmed no restenosis. Conclusion Limb shaking is an uncommon form of transient ischemic attack that should be recognized and differentiated from conditions such as focal motor seizures. Recognition will almost invariably indicate carotid artery occlusion, and timely treatment may not only abolish the attacks in patients but also reduce their risk of stroke. HCHB represents a spectrum of hyperkinetic movement disorders varying in the severity of choreic and/or ballistic movements. The presented case includes limb-shaking syndrome in the differential diagnosis and prompts for further investigations to complete the assessment. © 2015 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Source
Salinas M.,Hospital Universitario Of San Juan |
Salinas M.,University Miguel Hernandez |
Lopez-Garrigos M.,Hospital Universitario Of San Juan |
Uris J.,University of Alicante |
And 73 more authors.
Clinical Biochemistry | Year: 2014
Objectives: The study was performed to compare the variability and appropriateness in the request of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in primary care in Spain. Design and methods: 76 Spanish laboratories from diverse regions across Spain filled out the number of HbA1c tests requested by general practitioners (GPs) during the year 2012. Every patient seen at the different primary care centers was included in the study. Each participating laboratory was required to provide organizational data. The number of HbA1c requests per 1000 inhabitants was calculated and compared between regions. To investigate whether HbA1c was appropriately requested to manage and to diagnose Diabetes Mellitus (DM), the number of necessary HbA1c was calculated, according to the disease prevalence in Spain (6.9%) and the guidelines regarding DM management and diagnosis. Results: 17. 679. 195 patients were included in the study. A total of 1. 544. 551 HbA1c tests were ordered. No significant difference in the number of HbA1c requests per 1000 inhabitants was seen according to hospital setting (rural, urban or rural-urban). No significant differences were noticed between 3 Spanish regions, except the Valencian Community that presented higher values. Regarding the request appropriateness, 3. 280. 183 additional tests would have been necessary to manage diabetic patients and to diagnose new patients with the disease. Conclusion: There was a high variability regarding the request of HbA1c; the test was under-requested in all the participating health departments. This emphasizes the need to accomplish interventions to improve an appropriate use. © 2014. Source