Peng L.,Zhengzhou University |
Chun-guang Q.,Zhengzhou University |
Bei-fang L.,Hebi City Peoples Hospital |
Xue-zhi D.,Hebi City Peoples Hospital |
And 7 more authors.
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the leading causes for death in both developed and developing countries and it is the single largest cause of death in the United States, responsible for 1 out of every 6 deaths. The objective of this study was to determine microRNA (miRNA) expression in AMI and determine whether miR-133, miR-1291 and miR-663b could be measured in plasma as a biomarker for recurrence.Methods: Patients with AMI and those without AMI were retrospectively recruited for a comparison of their plasma miR-133, miR-1291 and miR-663b expression.Results: miR-133, miR-1291 and miR-663b levels were significantly overexpressed in AMI compared with Non-AMI. MiR-133 showed an AUC of 0.912, with a sensitivity of 81.1% and a specificity of 91.2%. The AUC for miR-1291 was 0.695, with a sensitivity of 78.4% and a specificity of 89.5%. The AUC for miR-663b was 0.611, with a sensitivity of 72.4% and a specificity of 76.5%.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the levels of miR-133, miR-1291 and miR-663b are associated with AMI. The potential of these miRNAs as biomarkers to improve patient stratification according to the risk of AMI and as circulating biomarkers for the AMI progonos warrants further study.Virtual Slides: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/8183629061241474. © 2014 Peng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Source
Liu P.,Hebi City Peoples Hospital |
Gao X.L.,Hebi City Peoples Hospital |
Li B.F.,Hebi City Peoples Hospital |
Ding X.Z.,Hebi City Peoples Hospital |
And 4 more authors.
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
To compare the feasibility, efficiency and safety of coronary angiography (CAG) and interventional procedures between the radial and femoral catheterization approaches in Chinese population using systematic review and meta-analysis, we conducted a search of the studies comparing radial and femoral catheterization approaches in patients underwent either CAG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Chinese population. Fixed-effect relative risk (RR) for the primary end points and the second end points were compared between the two approaches. A total of 27 studies (n=8,749 patients) were finally included in the analysis. The success rate of radial approach was slightly lower than that of femoral approach in patients receiving CAG (P=0.004), but similar in patients receiving a further PCI treatment (P=0.11). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) was similar between two approaches (P=0.27). Radial catheterization had a significantly lower rate of puncture site complications (P<0.00001), but a lower rate of puncture success rate (P=0.02). In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there was no difference in neither the risk of MACEs nor PCI success rate between two approaches (P=0.23 and 0.45, respectively), but a board line decrease of puncture success rate was observed in radial catheterization group (P=0.04). There were no significant differences in the volumes of contrast media, X-ray exposure time and operation time between the two approaches (all P>0.05). Thus, we concluded that radial approach is a safe method for CAG or PCI compared to traditional femoral approach in Chinese population due to their similar success rate of the procedure and risk of MACEs, and a decreased risk of puncture site complications. © 2015, E-Century Publishing Corporation. All rights Reserved. Source