Dos Santos G.,Business and Decision Life science C O GSK Vaccines |
Haguinet F.,GSK Vaccines |
Cohet C.,GSK Vaccines |
Webb D.,GSK R and D |
And 5 more authors.
Vaccine | Year: 2016
Background: Annual seasonal influenza vaccination is recommended for transplant recipients. No formal pharmacoepidemiology study has been published on the association between solid organ transplant (SOT) rejection and vaccination with seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIIVs). Methods: The risk of SOT (liver, kidney, lung, heart or pancreas) rejection after TIIV vaccination was assessed using a self-controlled case-series method (. NCT01715792). SOT recipients in England with transplant rejection were selected from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked Hospital Episode Statistics inpatient data. The study period (September 2006 to August 2009) encompassed three consecutive influenza seasons. We calculated the relative incidence (RI) of SOT rejection between the 30- and 60-day post-vaccination risk periods and the control periods (any follow-up period excluding risk periods), using a Poisson regression model. Results: In seasons 2006/07, 2007/08, 2008/09 and pooled seasons, 132, 136, 168 and 375 subjects, respectively, experienced at least one transplant rejection; approximately half (45%-51%) of these subjects had received a TIIV. For season 2006/07, the RI of rejection of any organ, adjusted for time since transplantation, was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.24-2.28) and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.24-1.38) during the 30-day and 60-day risk periods, respectively. Corresponding RIs for season 2007/08 were 1.21 (95% CI: 0.55-2.64) and 1.31 (95% CI: 0.69-2.48); for season 2008/09, 0.99 (95% CI: 0.43-2.28) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.31-1.33); and for pooled seasons 1.01 (95% CI: 0.58-1.76) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.56-1.38). The results of a separate analysis of kidney rejections and analyses that took into account additional potential confounders were consistent with those of the main analyses, with 95% CIs including 1 and upper limits below 3. Conclusion: This study provides reassuring evidence of the safety profile of TIIVs in SOT recipients, thus supporting current recommendations to vaccinate this risk group annually. © 2016 GSK Biologicals SA.
Gross A.S.,GSK R and D |
Goldfrad C.,GSK |
Hozawa S.,Hiroshima Allergy and Respiratory Clinic |
James M.H.,GSK K.K. |
And 3 more authors.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine | Year: 2015
Background: Fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) is a once daily (OD) inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination asthma therapy approved in Japan and the EU. FF/VI efficacy and safety data from asthma studies including patients in East Asia were evaluated to assess ethnic sensitivity. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase IIb/III trials were assessed. Change from baseline relative to placebo or twice-daily fluticasone propionate 500 μg in trough FEV1 was compared between patients from Japan (N = 148) and Not-Japan (N = 3,066; three studies). Adverse events (AEs), laboratory results, and electrocardiograms were compared between patients from Japan + Korea (N = 188) and Not-Japan + Korea (N = 3,840; five studies). Results: For trough FEV1, improvements from baseline (least-squares mean difference [95 % confidence interval]) were reported for FF/VI 100/25 μg OD versus placebo at Week 12 (Japan: 0.323 L [0.104-0.542]; Not-Japan: 0.168 L [0.095-0.241]). Improvements from baseline (least-squares mean change [standard error]) were reported with FF/VI 200/25 μg OD at Week 24 (Japan: 0.355 L [0.1152]; Not-Japan: 0.396 L [0.0313]). A greater proportion of patients from Japan + Korea versus Not-Japan + Korea reported AEs in all treatment arms including placebo (FF/VI 100/25 μg: 79 % versus 57 %; FF/VI 200/25 μg: 64 % versus 45 %; placebo: 41 % versus 23 %). There were no notable differences in treatment-related or class-related AEs. No clinically significant changes in electrocardiogram assessments or statistically significant differences in 24 h urinary cortisol excretion were observed between the Japan + Korea and Not-Japan + Korea cohorts. Conclusions: Good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile were observed for FF/VI 100/25 μg and 200/25 μg OD in East Asian asthma patients; these globally recommended doses are appropriate for asthma patients in Japan. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration numbers: NCT01165138 , NCT01134042 , NCT01086384 , NCT00603278 , NCT00603382. © 2015 Gross et al.
Jorg M.,Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences |
Kaczor A.A.,Medical University of Lublin |
Kaczor A.A.,University of Eastern Finland |
Mak F.S.,GSK R and D |
And 5 more authors.
MedChemComm | Year: 2014
Herein, we report the development of novel functionalized congeners of ropinirole toward the design of pharmacological tools to probe structural requirements at the dopamine D2 receptor. Subsequently, we have used the functionalized amine congener 11 and synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated a series of homobivalent ligands of ropinirole with designated spacer lengths ranging from 14 to 30 atoms. The most potent homobivalent ligands (22-, 26- and 30-atom spacers) showed approximately 20- to 80-fold greater potency (EC50 = 3.9, 6.2 and 14 nM, respectively) than ropinirole (304 nM) in a [35S]GTPγS functional assay. Molecular modeling studies suggest that the observed increase in potency of the homobivalent ligands is possibly due to a bitopic binding mode involving the orthosteric site and an allosteric interaction at the dopamine D2 receptor protomer rather than bridging interactions at two orthosteric sites across a dopamine D 2 receptor dimer. This research has the potential to advance the development of structurally related bitopic ligands, biomarkers such as radioligands and fluorescently labeled probes, and furnish new homo- and heterobivalent ligands towards a better understanding of the dopamine D 2 receptor and potential novel treatment for Parkinson's disease. © 2014 the Partner Organisations.
Chang Y.,Northeastern University |
Glass K.,Brigham and Women's Hospital |
Liu Y.-Y.,Brigham and Women's Hospital |
Silverman E.K.,Brigham and Women's Hospital |
And 9 more authors.
Genomics | Year: 2016
One of the most common smoking-related diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), results from a dysregulated, multi-tissue inflammatory response to cigarette smoke. We hypothesized that systemic inflammatory signals in genome-wide blood gene expression can identify clinically important COPD-related disease subtypes, and we leveraged pre-existing gene interaction networks to guide unsupervised clustering of blood microarray expression data. Using network-informed non-negative matrix factorization, we analyzed genome-wide blood gene expression from 229 former smokers in the ECLIPSE Study, and we identified novel, clinically relevant molecular subtypes of COPD. These network-informed clusters were more stable and more strongly associated with measures of lung structure and function than clusters derived from a network-naïve approach, and they were associated with subtype-specific enrichment for inflammatory and protein catabolic pathways. These clusters were successfully reproduced in an independent sample of 135 smokers from the COPDGene Study. © 2016 Elsevier Inc..
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Once-Daily Intranasal Fluticasone Furoate and Levocabastine Administered Alone or Simultaneously as fluticasone Furoate/Levocabastine Fixed-Dose Combination
Allen A.,GSK R and D |
Murdoch R.D.,GSK R and D |
Bareille P.,GSK R and D |
Burns O.,GSK R and D |
And 3 more authors.
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development | Year: 2016
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate potential systemic pharmacokinetic interactions between intranasal fluticasone furoate (FF) and levocabastine (LEVO) when delivered simultaneously via a metered atomizing spray pump. Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, crossover study. Healthy male and female subjects (n=30) received once-daily repeat doses of FF/LEVO (100/200μg) as a fixed-dose combination (FDC), FF (110μg), or LEVO (200μg) for 7 days. FF and LEVO plasma pharmacokinetics (0-24 hours) were measured on day 7, with safety assessments over the study duration. Results: Systemic exposure to LEVO was similar when administered as FF/LEVO FDC or LEVO alone. Following FF/LEVO FDC or FF alone, the majority (>99%) of FF concentrations were nonquantifiable, that is, below the lower limit of quantification of 10pg/mL. All treatments were well tolerated, and adverse event incidence was similar across the treatment groups. Conclusions: These results suggest that in healthy subjects, for LEVO, there is no pharmacokinetic interaction with FF when delivered as FF/LEVO FDC. As the majority of data were below the assay sensitivity for FF, any potential differences in the bioavailability of FF when delivered alone or as FF/LEVO FDC could not be established. There was no clinically relevant impact on safety/tolerability when FF/LEVO was coadministered. © 2016, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.