Granite Construction Inc.
Granite Construction Inc.
News Article | May 15, 2017
Dublin, Ireland headquartered CRH PLC's stock finished last Friday's session 0.99% lower at $36.91. A total volume of 716,684 shares was traded, which was above their three months average volume of 655,140 shares. The Company's shares have advanced 7.77% in the past month, 8.37% over the previous three months, and 8.87% since the start of this year. The stock is trading above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages by 4.54% and 10.14%, respectively. Additionally, shares of CRH, which through its subsidiaries, manufactures and distributes building materials, have a Relative Strength Index (RSI) of 59.09. On April 21st, 2017, research firm Bank of America/ Merrill upgraded the Company's stock rating from 'Neutral' to 'Buy'. Visit us today and download your complete report on CRH for free at: On Friday, shares in San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico-based CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V. ended the session 0.23% lower at $8.73. The stock recorded a trading volume of 3.46 million shares. The Company's shares have gained 0.88% in the last one month, 0.43% in the previous three months, and 13.07% on an YTD basis. The stock is trading 1.04% above its 50-day moving average and 7.09% above its 200-day moving average. Moreover, shares of CEMEX, which produces, markets, distributes, and sells cement, ready-mix concrete, aggregates, and other construction materials in Mexico and internationally, have an RSI of 50.29. The complimentary research report on CX can be accessed at: Dallas, Texas headquartered Eagle Materials Inc.'s shares dropped 2.31%, closing the session at $98.54, with a total trading volume of 430,727 shares. The stock has gained 3.58% in the last one month and 0.11% on an YTD basis. Shares of the Company, which produces and sells construction products and building materials for use in residential, industrial, commercial, and infrastructure construction in the US, are trading 0.80% and 7.01% above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages, respectively. Additionally, Eagle Materials' stock has an RSI of 51.63. Register for free on Stock-Callers.com and download the PDF research report on EXP at: Last Friday at the close, shares in Watsonville, California headquartered Granite Construction Inc. recorded a trading volume of 604,881 shares, which was above their three months average volume of 513,710 shares. The stock ended the session 1.93% lower at $48.38. The Company's shares are trading below their 50-day moving average by 5.21%. Furthermore, shares of Granite Construction, which operates as a heavy civil contractor and a construction materials producer in the US, have an RSI of 33.20. On May 03rd, 2017, research firm FBR & Co. reiterated its 'Outperform' rating on the Company's stock with a decrease of the target price from $67 a share to $63 a share. Get free access to your research report on GVA at: Stock Callers (SC) produces regular sponsored and non-sponsored reports, articles, stock market blogs, and popular investment newsletters covering equities listed on NYSE and NASDAQ and micro-cap stocks. SC has two distinct and independent departments. One department produces non-sponsored analyst certified content generally in the form of press releases, articles and reports covering equities listed on NYSE and NASDAQ and the other produces sponsored content (in most cases not reviewed by a registered analyst), which typically consists of compensated investment newsletters, articles and reports covering listed stocks and micro-caps. Such sponsored content is outside the scope of procedures detailed below. SC has not been compensated; directly or indirectly; for producing or publishing this document. The non-sponsored content contained herein has been prepared by a writer (the "Author") and is fact checked and reviewed by a third party research service company (the "Reviewer") represented by a credentialed financial analyst [for further information on analyst credentials, please email email@example.com. Rohit Tuli, a CFA® charterholder (the "Sponsor"), provides necessary guidance in preparing the document templates. The Reviewer has reviewed and revised the content, as necessary, based on publicly available information which is believed to be reliable. Content is researched, written and reviewed on a reasonable-effort basis. The Reviewer has not performed any independent investigations or forensic audits to validate the information herein. The Reviewer has only independently reviewed the information provided by the Author according to the procedures outlined by SC. SC is not entitled to veto or interfere in the application of such procedures by the third-party research service company to the articles, documents or reports, as the case may be. Unless otherwise noted, any content outside of this document has no association with the Author or the Reviewer in any way. SC, the Author, and the Reviewer are not responsible for any error which may be occasioned at the time of printing of this document or any error, mistake or shortcoming. No liability is accepted whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from the use of this document. SC, the Author, and the Reviewer expressly disclaim any fiduciary responsibility or liability for any consequences, financial or otherwise arising from any reliance placed on the information in this document. Additionally, SC, the Author, and the Reviewer do not (1) guarantee the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or correct sequencing of the information, or (2) warrant any results from use of the information. The included information is subject to change without notice. This document is not intended as an offering, recommendation, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned or discussed, and is to be used for informational purposes only. Please read all associated disclosures and disclaimers in full before investing. Neither SC nor any party affiliated with us is a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer with any agency or in any jurisdiction whatsoever. To download our report(s), read our disclosures, or for more information, visit CONTACT For any questions, inquiries, or comments reach out to us directly. If you're a company we are covering and wish to no longer feature on our coverage list contact us via email and/or phone between 09:30 EDT to 16:00 EDT from Monday to Friday at: Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone number: +44-330-808-3765 Office Address: Clyde Offices, Second Floor, 48 West George Street, Glasgow, U.K. -G2 1BP CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
News Article | May 18, 2017
Granite Construction Inc. has been named to the Forbes list of the “100 Most Trustworthy Companies in America” for the third consecutive year. The list includes only publicly traded companies. “We are honored to once again be recognized as one of the most trustworthy companies in America,” says Granite President and CEO James H. Roberts. “We owe this recognition to our employees who are the heart and soul of our company and to our Code of Conduct, which encompasses the values that have been and will continue to be vital to our success.” According to the company, it is one of only 18 U.S. businesses that have made the list several times in the past few years. To create the list, MSCI ESG Research screened 2,300 publicly traded U.S. firms. Factors considered include high-risk behaviors like regulatory actions, amended filings, revenue and expense recognition methods, and bankruptcy risk.
News Article | May 4, 2017
Granite Construction Inc. reported a net loss of $23.8 million for the first quarter this year. According to Granite Construction, it lost $10.4 million in the first quarter of 2016. “Despite the loss in the first quarter, we maintain our strong growth expectations for 2017,” says James Roberts, president and CEO of Granite Construction. “The overall outlook and direction of our business is excellent, with market improvements being seen across our portfolio.” Roberts cited the California legislature’s approval of SB 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, as a reason for optimism. The bill commits more than $52 billion of incremental investment in the state over the next decade, Granite Construction says. “This combines with the nearly $190 billion of long-term local measures passed by voters in California and Washington state last November to signal a significant, positive shift in public infrastructure investment,” Roberts says. “Our vertically integrated teams in the West are well prepared to handle the growth, as these businesses are still operating well below capacity.” Granite Construction’s bidding and booking activity remained healthy in the first quarter, the company says. This activity drove the company’s construction segment backlog more than 17 percent higher than 2016 to nearly $1.18 billion – an all-time record level,” Roberts adds. “Due to significant rainfall throughout the West, the construction materials segment was unable to get any traction for production in the quarter,” he says. “Operations at almost all of our facilities were delayed until materials deposits dried for efficient aggregate and asphalt production, which began at some locations in April. We believe secular demand is improving. “Despite the weather-impacted start, we continue to expect stronger demand, and execution will spur our materials businesses to deliver top- and bottom-line improvement this year,” Roberts continues. “Similarly, our construction segment is poised for an exceptional year, having gotten off to a solid start even with weather headwinds.” According to Granite Construction, its first-quarter consolidated revenue increased 6.6 percent to $468.4 million. That compares to $439.5 million in the first quarter of 2016. Gross profit decreased to $25.1 million compared with $39.2 million last year, and the company’s gross profit margin was 5.4 percent compared with 8.9 percent in 2016. The company’s construction materials revenue was flat compared to last year at $34.5 million. Also, Granite Construction’s first-quarter gross loss expanded to $5.4 million compared to a loss of $1.2 million last year, Granite Construction says. Granite Construction continues to expect low-double digit consolidated revenue growth for 2017, as well as a consolidated EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) margin of 6.5 to 7.5 percent.
Robinette C.,Granite Construction Inc. |
Epps J.,Granite Construction Inc. |
Epps J.,Texas A&M University
Transportation Research Record | Year: 2010
Today, public agencies responsible for roads, streets, and highways are experiencing significant increases in the price of construction operations and asphalt binder availability; they are also experiencing limited available funds and the uncertainty of inflation. Those concerns are coupled with significant pressure to build, maintain, and rehabilitate "green," and agencies must look to alternative construction, rehabilitation, and maintenance methods as well as alternative materials that deliver on both of these seemingly different forces. Life-cycle assessment was used to evaluate roadway construction activities. Life-cycle assessment is similar to life-cycle cost analysis, except that environmental impact is considered over the analysis period. Life-cycle assessment includes energy consumption, emissions generation, and natural resource consumption in addition to price of the activity. All activities evaluated were compared with conventional materials and means of construction. Materials evaluated specific to hot-mix asphalt included reclaimed asphalt pavement, asphalt shingles, and warm-mix asphalt. Aggregate base stabilization and subgrade treatments were evaluated as part of a low- and high-traffic-volume facility. The final evaluation considered rehabilitation and maintenance activities that focused on in-place recycling, such as hot in-place and cold in-place recycling. In most instances, these activities can reduce energy consumption and emissions generation and can conserve natural resources (aggregate and asphalt binder), plus offer the benefit of reducing the price of construction. These materials and technologies show promise in helping agencies meet the rising price of construction while addressing public concern for the environment.
Robinette C.J.,Granite Construction Inc. |
Breakah T.M.,Iowa State University |
Williams R.C.,Iowa State University |
Bausano J.P.,Sem Materials L.P.
Road Materials and Pavement Design | Year: 2010
The dynamic complex modulus test is quickly coming into the mainstream of practice for research purposes and implementation by owner/agencies. Past research projects have developed estimated limits of accuracy for laboratory mixed/laboratory compacted specimens, however there is little information for field mixed/laboratory compacted specimens. The dynamic complex modulus test was conducted on each of 17 field mixed/laboratory compacted mixtures with various volumetric properties and three replicate specimens to evaluate test variability. Included were factors believed to affect the results and variability of the dynamic modulus test. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the significance of the factors. The results of the analysis showed that three main factors were significant contributors to the variability of the dynamic complex modulus test results (nominal maximum aggregate size, test temperature, and binder grade). Six factors were checked and validated to be the main contributors in the dynamic modulus values (air voids, asphalt content, frequency, temperature, use of recycled asphalt pavement, and binder grade). © 2010 Lavoisier, Paris.
McTavish R.,Granite Construction Inc. |
Stallard R.,Granite Construction Inc.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | Year: 2011
The factors that are considered in analyzing technical solutions and the tools used to obtain technical solutions have changed for construction engineers over the past 30 years. This paper discusses these changes and their impacts. It then outlines a process that several heavy civil contracting firms use to generate work plans for their field operations, using the details of the process at Granite Construction as an example. The paper concludes by identifying the key factors in the success of a work plan and providing some thoughts on what construction engineering education should emphasize. © 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Hand A.,Granite Construction Inc.
Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions | Year: 2013
The objective of the presentation was to answer the question - "As an asphalt contractor what are the company objectives for using sustainable technologies?" For Granite, the sustainability goal optimizes economic (return on investment or ROI), environmental (compliance), and social (citizenship) impacts. Granite's sustainability plan includes: • Operation of energy-efficient asphalt production facilities on a per-unit consumption basis; • Responsible use of sustainable materials technologies without compromising the quality of the end-product; • Increased use of recycled materials in asphalt pavements; and • Increased use of WMA consistent with quality objectives. As an example of the economic component of the sustainability goal (ROI), Dr. Hand noted that Granite invested in modifications to ten mixing plants to reduce losses, improve energy consump tion, reduce energy costs, and account for peak demands. Examples of improvements included insulating drums and hot oil piping and installing variable frequency drives on baghouse fans. The presentation also examined Granite's use of RAP. Dr. Hand noted that RAP was initially separated into three piles depending on the source. A and B piles are formed from known sources (projects) and are expected to have lower binder stiffness and good aggregate qualities - which permits maximized use of RAP with minimized virgin binder grades. C piles include imported RAP and is more typically used in EnviroBase. Dr. Hand also noted that fractionation of RAP was common as the percentage of RAP used exceeds 25%. Fractionating provides reduced variability and allows the use of the finer RAP fraction (<9.5 mm) which has a higher binder content (allowing a greater binder replacement). Dr. Hand also reviewed the sustainable technologies in use today including RAP, RAS, WMA, Crumb Rubber Modified mixes, and Ground Tire Rubber modified asphalt. Dr. Hand focused on WMA as an example and noted how the selection of WMA technology impacted the ROI (cost of equipment and technology), and Compliance/Citizenship (reduced energy use and emissions) while maintaining quality (improvement of workability and attainment of density).