Medical Education Global Solutions

Paris, France

Medical Education Global Solutions

Paris, France
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

Huber K.,Wilhelminen Hospital | Connolly S.J.,Hamilton Health Sciences | Kher A.,Consultant in Hemostasis and Thrombosis | Christory F.,Medical Education Global Solutions | And 11 more authors.
International Journal of Clinical Practice | Year: 2013

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism, and is the most prevalent factor for cardioembolic stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with AF since the early 1990s. They are very effective for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke, but are limited by factors such as drug-drug interactions, food interactions, slow onset and offset of action, haemorrhage and need for routine anticoagulation monitoring to maintain a therapeutic international normalised ratio (INR). Multiple new oral anticoagulants have been developed as potential replacements for VKAs for stroke prevention in AF. Most are small synthetic molecules that target thrombin (e.g. dabigatran etexilate) or factor Xa (e.g. rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban, YM150). These drugs have predictable pharmacokinetics that allow fixed dosing without routine laboratory monitoring. Dabigatran etexilate, the first of these new oral anticoagulants to be approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF, represents an effective and safe alternative to VKAs. Under the auspices of the Regional Anticoagulation Working Group, a multidisciplinary group of experts in thrombosis and haemostasis from Central and Eastern Europe, an expert panel with expertise in AF convened to discuss practical, clinically important issues related to the long-term use of dabigatran for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF. The practical information reviewed in this article will help clinicians make appropriate use of this new therapeutic option in daily clinical practice. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Garcia-Borreguero D.,Sleep Research Institute | Stillman P.,Primary Care Practice | Benes H.,University of Rostock | Buschmann H.,Primary Care Practice | And 10 more authors.
BMC Neurology | Year: 2011

Background: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder with a lifetime prevalence of 3-10%. in European studies. However, the diagnosis of RLS in primary care remains low and mistreatment is common.Methods: The current article reports on the considerations of RLS diagnosis and management that were made during a European Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (EURLSSG)-sponsored task force consisting of experts and primary care practioners. The task force sought to develop a better understanding of barriers to diagnosis in primary care practice and overcome these barriers with diagnostic and treatment algorithms.Results: The barriers to diagnosis identified by the task force include the presentation of symptoms, the language used to describe them, the actual term "restless legs syndrome" and difficulties in the differential diagnosis of RLS.Conclusion: The EURLSSG task force reached a consensus and agreed on the diagnostic and treatment algorithms published here. © 2011 Garcia-Borreguero et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Loading Medical Education Global Solutions collaborators
Loading Medical Education Global Solutions collaborators